Some variety ethnically but all the models are very young.
I normally would avoid a site with the word "brutal" in the title, but these scenes are not brutal at all. Some are even arousing and fun to watch.
I knew a lot of the 59 models which is a surprise for me and like the ones I know of.
Cons:
No longer updating and really I don't think the network is updating.
Nearly every model has tattoos. I personally like tattoos, but know it is more often seen as a negative by porn fans.
Too predictable as each scene is identical except for the models.
Prechecked cross sell
Bottom Line:
Brutal Castings has 59 videos that has not updated since April 2017. It was active for about two years and it was very controversial.
In the documentary “Hot Girls Wanted” porn star Ava Taylor states that her scene on this site turned her off from continuing her career. The fact is that she did scenes after the one on this site and later admitted that the reason she left porn had nothing to do with this scene.
After that controversy the site changed the format somewhat. At the end of each scene, they had an interview with the porn star. They talked about how much fun it was and that they were happy they did the scenes. You see smiling and sometimes laughing. How sincere this was is unknowable. Maybe it was required by the site as a condition in order to get paid. This is fairly common on sites that have BDSM as a theme.
What this boils down to is a site with forceful, but BDSM that is light by porn standards. If you have seen Kink sites, you could even call this one tame in comparison. The basic premise is that a very young aspiring, but inexperienced wannabe glamour model shows up at a modeling agency. She is coaxed into going to topless with panties or just bra and panties. They are verbally pressured to go nude, they resist and are lightly tied up, binding their wrists together with a rope. The abuse is not really much and is primarily verbal.
Ava Taylor looked a bit spaced out in her scene, but not shocked. I think she was not into this sexually and was just earning a paycheck. None of the women seem sincerely surprised or shocked either.
I did not see any anal and every scene is oral by one partner on the other and then vaginal. There is nothing over the top sexually.
Besides Ava Taylor, they also have Sadie Pop, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. These are all beautiful professionals that can be counted on for top notch scenes. However, one scene caught my eye with star Ally Berry. I have never seen her before but she is my new favorite as she is the perfect combination of looks and believable enthusiasm. I am fairly sure all the models are Americans.
By itself this site does not have enough to get my recommendation. However there are many other interesting sites that are included as the network has 52 sites.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Top talent
Really great content (not every bodies taste)
Cons:
Updates are few and far between even before covid
Unmentioned 30GB a day download limit.
Network is no longer exclusive as they sell scene by scene on various PPV sites.
All in site membership cancel links are broken so canceling is a waiting game on customer service emails
Searching is a pain and you have to go site by site some times to find your model
Bottom Line:
Site is part of the fetish network but does not show in the network listings and has to be logged into seperatly. This network was a complete ripoff. It is almost impossible to download the content I wanted as I kept hitting their (according to them non-existent) download limit. I received an email in reply to one I sent in complaint of the limit and they flat out confirmed a 30gb daily limit while reporting to the admins here that there is no limit at all. Because I use my 4k tv as a monitor I download A LOT (shut-up I don't have a problem! lol) of 4k, the file sizes here are huge, 9gb to some over 15gb. So I was constantly hitting the limit. It's sad as this site and the entire network has top shelf content. But as this is the only site out of (I think) 29 sites that is still (semi) updating, $40 monthly it just plain greedy. teencreeper hasn't updated since dec 2019, Brutalpov hasn't udated since Oct 2019, the rest haven't updated since mid 2018, so yes $40 a month is ridiculous! All of the in site cancel membership links are broken and have been for months. Email is spotty so to cancel you have to email them and they even say to try to cancel 30 days ahead of expected rebill. The site is extremely dated and in desperate need of an overhaul. Now their scenes are being sold one by one on the ppv sites so now non-exclusive. These guys just flat out gave up on the site and are just taking peoples money and giving as little as possible in return.
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes.
Cons:
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site
Bottom Line:
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Part of Fetish Network
Many maybe mostly Latinas
Sexy legs, short skirts and pantyhose
PU has a discount
Cons:
No longer updating since 2014
Too much male oriented, for you guys that is a plus.
Too many scenes with opaque pantyhose
Only 44 videos
Bottom Line:
I joined a few months ago and liked the videos. It is part of the Fetish Network of a lot of sites, but to me the count is not clear unless you have access to the member’s area. PU says there are 31 sites, but I think it was a lot more.
The scenes are filmed in Miami as you see signs like the name of a college. The models look fresh to me and I did not know any. Since it is in Miami, you get a lot of women that are Latina. You can see that in their names.
The focus is on sexy legs, short skirts and pantyhose. Yummy, how can this go wrong?
The beginning of each scene shows a young lady, maybe 20 something, sitting, walking, on the phone or just chilling out. The scenes are shot from a bit too far, sometimes with a zoom lens. This adds to the touch of realism, despite being staged. It made me feel I was being a voyeur watching something that in real life would turn anyone on, but are afraid to do. You can’t stare up a woman’s skirt in public without being very brave.
The models never wear panties and often you see them parting their legs. All I can say is wow.
The cameraman invites them to his studio for a shoot. They refuse sex with him, but will put on a show for him instead. They strip nicely, but there is more than I want of emphasis on the feet and pantyhose. I like to see short skirts and hose in public, but not so much if that is all they are wearing. It hides the goods and also many wear that opaque type that does nothing for me. Eventually they strip to nude and masturbate. There is a lot of Jerk Off Instruction, great for the guys, but I find it boring and distracting.
The site is not updating and has not since 2014. It is stuck at 44 quite good videos. It comes with a lot of other sites in the network, but not many that appeal to me though.
For me the content is about 90, but I have to take off for the site being small and no longer updating. I suspect you guys would like the JOI parts more than I did. There are a lot of unusual fetish sites in the network you might like too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-17-2005:59am (Update History) Reason: New vital information in the cons area
Pros:
1. Awesome content
2. Top shelf talent
Cons:
1. No model index
2. Severely restrictive (unmentioned) 30GB daily download limit.
3. Latest videos by date looks like entire network is updated with maybe one video a month.
4. Navigation is a pain, pretty much have to go site by site and then scene by scene.
5. If data limit is hit then you have to wait 24hrs and submit a account reset form and be given a new user name and password
6. Time does not reset at a given time, if you download 29.5gb at 7:20am then you have to wait until 7:30am the next day to download again.
Bottom Line:
This site has some pretty awesome content but is in serious need of an overhaul. There is no model index at all. A previous review said you could open a scene and click on a models name to bring up her scenes, I found this to be untrue. Going by site by site they have their scenes listed with no model name, after you click on the scene it then will give her name.
Now for my biggest con. There is a ridiculously restrictive daily download limit of 30GB. This is not mentioned anywhere. When you offer 4k quality videos this is a crazy small amount. the 4k videos are upwards of 10-12 gb in size so only 3 videos a day! Plus if you hit this limit you have to request a account reset to continue to download. This is unacceptable. Why doesn't it reset after 24 hours like every other site with a limit?! Look, I get the bootleg concerns but this is punishing the people who choose to be a customer and actually pay for your content and I am a firm believer in supporting my favorite studios/producers by buying dvd's/blurays and memberships. I collect scenes of my favorite models and download three sizes: 720, 1080, and if available the 2160. Yes I am a 4k snob, I download the 720 for my tablet. So today I think I hit the limit at just TWO VIDEOS! I don't know if they ban people for multiple infractions but I will update this review if this is the case. It's sad because this site has just fantastic, amazing, outstanding content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch.
Cons:
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review.
Bottom Line:
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Nice high quality camera work
2. Large selection of movie types
3. Large number of movies available
4. Movies are a good length
Cons:
1. Very low down load limit per day. 3 to 15 HD movies per day.
2. Hard to unsubscribe from. (Seriously why make dead unsubscribe pages, you're just driving people away)
3. They try to add on expensive services when you sign up.
4. They sell your contact information without asking. (Possibly they ask in their privacy statement)
5. Movies get repetitive very quickly due to lack of original ideas
Bottom Line:
Why do some sites treat their customers like this? These are people willing to pay you money for your site!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of strapon squad ******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Dirty talk is emphasized ("you want this don't you" - that kind of thing.) But often sounds put on and disingenuous.
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space
Cons:
- Sound quality was an issue. I would guess they don't use a boom mic so action goes from bearly audible to wake the wife up LOUD.
- The last update was in 2016.
- Videos are about 20 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of August 11, 2017, only 15 videos available. (******the full site of Strapon Squad has 100s)
Bottom Line:
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content straponsquad.com to add to their network. I liked what was available more than I thought I would although the production value isn't as high as native kink content. I've certainly been spoiled with my membership. The focus of the site is pretty straight forward girl on girl domination often 2 on 1.
I wish there was more available through kink.com The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. With only 15 adds since January, it doesn't make sense to buy kink.com if this is the only site you're interested in. However, if you liked SS and are missing them since they haven't updated in months kink has similar sites that will scratch your itch.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young attractive models.
Newer sites seem to have found a niche.
Newer video quality is good.
Site layout is pretty good.
Navigation is pretty good.
Videos are user scored on a 5 point scale.
Updates are dated.
Download speeds are OK.
Current sites are 1080p.
A few videos are 4k.
Cons:
Many older sites no longer update.
The newer sites are not BDSM sites, they are "Simulated Peril" sites. (Can we coin that phrase, maybe?)
Only 1 update a week across all sites.
HUGE video blocking watermarks on every video
Infuriating page load delays until you scroll down to view the next sections.
Images but NO ZIP FILES!
File resolutions and sizes not listed.
Video file naming could be better.
Repetitive nature of themes is unfortunate.
Very limited set and male actor variety.
OH. Cancellation process is worst on Internet!
Cancel fine print says you have to cancel at least 30 DAYS prior to next billing. That's nuts!
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying that my review is primarily about the dedicated, updating micro-sites in this "network".
When it comes to BDSM material, I think the gold standard is probably the Kink network. That network provides a lot of really raw, tie-the-girl-down-and-make-her-come-a-million-times true BDSM that is consensual but incredibly intense. Some of it is a bit too brutal for me, though, although it is clearly all consensual.
In the middle, I don't know, several sites where a model/actress is tied down and you can't quite tell if she is acting or not when the guy puts a vibrator to her clit. BBB comes to mind, but there is a moderate amount of acting there.
Then there are these "simulated peril" sites. The girl is tied up loosely or only has her hands tied together during sex, with a backstory that implies peril. Sites in this category include the main micro-sites here and those on the sister site punishteens.com. These sites may have popular models and porn stars, but the scenes are nowhere near as intense as scenes found on true BDSM sites. (The best of this simulated type that I ever saw was on the Hustler site. Guy breaks in and attacks the girl, girl gets a gun, girl makes guy seriously fuck her, then at the end the girl points the gun at him and after fade-to-black, shoots him. Awesome Karma!) Sorry, I digress, but it was best-of-genre and memorable.
All that said, there are 7 micro-sites here that I consider current and not a purchased collection.
They are: (scenes in p
Teen Creeper (8 )
Teens in the Woods (12)
Helpless Teens (42)
Brutal Casings (56)
Brutal Pickups (12. last update: 5/16) Sexual Disgrace (130. last update 8/16)
Strap-on Squad (60. last update 9/16)
Sexual Disgrace is a pretty good traditional dungeon-style BDSM site with a lot of content. Strap-on Squad is an all girl dungeon-style site. Both of these seem to be no longer be updating.
Note that there is 1, one, one, ONE primary male actor on all of the sites listed above, except Teen Creeper, and he is also often found on punishteens as well. He is a very, very busy guy.
There are also 11 "collection" sites that do not update, many of which are so old (i.e. 2011) as to be all medium to standard def. There are a total of about 1,130 videos in these collections. There is some true BDSM here and some good images.
Just in case you can't guess, here are the themes:
Teen Creeper: Break-in and forced sex. 1 or 2 girls. A few of these scenes are pretty good but all are nearly identical in format. This site uses a different male actor who is a good creeper.
Teens in the Woods: Girl(s) in the woods find their way to a house where a forest ranger serial rapist lives.
Helpless Teens: Stranded girls who need a ride do stuff in the front and the back of a van for that ride. Many get dragged back to a dungeon-like bed for additional sex.
Brutal Castings: Exactly as it sounds. Starts out nice, then the guy goes ape-shit on the girl, ties her hands and screws her.
Brutal pick-ups: Girl on a street gets pulled into an alley, hands tied and screwed.
They all sound pretty good, don't they? Well, although the first one of each of these that you watch will be entertaining (Ava Taylor in Brutal Castings, for example, or Gina Valentina in the first few minutes of Teen Creeper), they are all so similar that they quickly get boring. Add that the girls are usually not really tied up and are clearly just doing their usual porn acting stuff, complete with the usual porn sequences from blow job to money shot, and the whole thing goes pretty limp. Honestly, the best part of each scene is the moment when the guy "grabs" the girl and you can't quite tell if the initial reaction from the girl is acting or not. (That sounds really creepy, but, hey, that's why I joined!) The limited themes and settings, the repetition and the occasional re-use of an actress on different micro-sites, detracts from the overall entertainment value.
Overall, the sets are well done and well lit. The guy does a pretty good job of acting and the girls' acting varies. Video quality on these is good,although the actual video size is not consistent across all the sets. You don't know if "HD Hi" is 2K or 4K until you start the download and file sizes are not listed.
The newer sites have a frustrating "feature". When viewing the 4-8 sets on a page, the section of the page that is not visible does not load until you scroll down. So you spend a truly stupid amount of time waiting for the page to load as you scroll. This is unnervingly slow during peak internet hours. 4 to 8 sets per page? Why should I have to wait?
Oh, and there is no easy way to cancel.
Uh oh. Ran out of space. I would recommend this site to those who really like the simulated BDSM style, or for anyone looking for a bargain in older true BDSM. I downloaded what I wanted and will probably not be back
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
First lets cover some basic Pro's
1) There are around 4143 Video's
2) There are around 46 sites
3) They hire some top notch talent
4) They have a large selection of amateur porn
5) They have a large variety of Fetish porn
6) There is no download limit
7) Their content goes back over a decade
8 Their new content is 1080p
9) Most of their content has Photo set's
10) They have the best selection of Fantasy Rape Porn of any site on the web!
Cons:
Now lets cover some basic Con's
1) Out of their 4143 Videos less than 20% are in Full 1080p.
2) Most of the 46 sites no longer update and are years old.
3) Their search function could use a lot of work, it is hard to find the newest scenes.
4) Their streaming encounters a lot of errors.
5) Their older movies could use better descriptions
6) They seem to buy content in patches about twice a year so there are long content droughts
7) Several of their scenes are missing, poorly encoded, missing sound or are not downloadable at all
8 Some people have trouble cancelling their membership but I did not have this problem.
Bottom Line:
So now that we have covered some basic pros and con's let's get down to the real review. The Fetish Network has been on my radar for years. But I never took a chance on them before which is a shame. This holiday season they offered a 10$ membership and I jumped at the chance at a 66% savings over what TBP offered. But even at TBP price of $30 this is it 100% worth a 1 month membership!
If you have a fetish this site probably has something that caters to it. I like harder content like Facial Abuse, Kink, Elite Pain and Assylum. Sites that specialize in humiliation and taking the actresses to their very limits.
If you are a fan of Rape Fantasy (Like you see in a lot of Japanese Porn) then The Fetish Network is without a doubt the #1 porn site on the internet for this niche Fetish. They devote multiple sites to this Rape Fantasy Fetish: Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Brutal Castings and Brutal Pickups. It is debatable if other sites fill this role but in my opinion these are their premium Rape Fantasy Sites. The scenes have a great sexual tension and build up, they follow a well planned plot progression and finish well.
There has been a lot said about violence against women and I 100% agree. Women should be respected and going past a safe word is always wrong. If that is your fear then you need not worry you wont find James Deen here. Instead they use Bruno Dickemz and some people do not like him but personally I think he does a excellent job. They do a lot of before and after interviews so you can see the actresses are well taken care of.
The Fetish Network is not without its con's which I outlined. But most of those con's are to be expected of such a large site with older content. In fact I subscribed to them using a CC just to see if they would cancel upon request. After two weeks they responded and canceled you just have to be patient. This is my personal experience with them however so if you want to be safe please feel free to use a disposable visa of some sort.
In conclusion The Fetish Network far exceeded my expectations. There is real value for money invested in them and it is my conclusion they are worth a 1 month membership. You will not find a better selection of Fantasy Rape Porn on the Internet period and this is coming from a reviewer who specializes in this niche. I gave this site a 90 because they offer "The Best FRP Content" on the internet today.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 12 Videos
- Fresh, A-list models
- Some element of public nudity / sex
- Can be joined as part of a network
- Rough sex, bondage
- Good acting
- Discount if joined through the network
Cons:
- Hasnt updated since May 2016
- Very little scene variation
- Likely too rough for many porn buyers
- Stand-alone site is more expensive than the network
Bottom Line:
Make no mistake that this site is definitely not for everyone. Even if you like D/s and BDSM scenes from sites like Kink this site takes the fantasy to an extreme by playing it as if there is no consent, at the beginning at least. (The possible exceptions with Kink would be Bound Gangbangs and Hardcore Gang Bang where the fantasy is also forced sex.) I have to confess that as someone who often likes these scenarios, this site made me a bit uncomfortable. But thats as much the quality of the acting as the forced-sex scenario.
The scenario used in each scene follows the same formula. Im usually willing to live with scenario-based porn when the basis for it really doesnt allow a lot of variation. For example, if you subscribe to a massage site there is little variation possible. It would be like the recent stepfather and stepdaughter scenes all starting with the stepdaughter wanting to model an outfit. The step premise allows for many variations. Thats the problem with how the scenes are set up on Brutal Pickups: there are other possible variations but the same one is used, often with no modification. The scenes start on a dimly lit Miami street at nighttime and we see a creepy looking guy standing in the shadows. No one in their right mind would approach this guy in these circumstances but along comes a scantily-clad 18-20 year old who happens to be lost and needs some help. Hello? My recommendation is flagging down a police car rather than seeking assistance from a guy who looks like he just go released from prison that morning!
As you can imagine, this shifty looking young man helps our damsel in distress and faith in humanity is restored. Or not. What really happens is a forced-sex scene with bondage.
As the scene progresses the female models begin to play it differently. She begins to play it as if shes enjoying it and by the end of the scene shes a willing participant. (I should also add, that like most other sites that make porn like this there is an interview with the female model after the scene where she makes it abundantly clear that she fully consented to everything.)
If there is a positive element to how these scenes are played it is that the actors tend to play the roles well. There is an inherent creepiness to the whole business. In a good way.
The female models are some of the newest of the A-list girls in the business. Having models like Jojo Kiss, Anya Olsen and Gina Valentina really adds value to the site.
As an aside, a complaint I have about this site, and most of the sites on this network, is the utter lack of anal scenes. It seems to me that this premise lends itself well to including some anal sex.
I wouldnt suggest to any prospective member that this site should be classed as a public nudity or public sex site but there are elements of those here. As someone who likes that rare niche it does add heat to the scenes. The scenes begin on the streets of Miami with cars driving by. The model is pulled just in off the street, bound and fucked in a way that in many cases its obvious that there is some risk of getting caught.
The obvious downside to the site is that it is small, with only 12 scenes, and it hasnt updated since May, 2016. I think a reasonable interpretation is that the site is dead. While thats bad, there is a silver lining. While the site alone is a $39 fee, if you join the network (Fetish Network) you get all the sites for the TBP discounted price of $29. But as networks go this one doesnt offer a lot of variety and many of the sites havent updated in years.
Like the other newer sites on the network this one has three download resolutions. This is a big improvement over what some of the older dead sites offer. There is Hi (1920x1080, 8000kb/s), Medium (1280x720, 6000kb/s) and SD (854x480, 2000kb/s). Framerates are 23fps on all of those. I downloaded the 1080p scenes and subjectively they look good. They are crisp and show no obvious pixilation.
Im going to do something unusual for a review and not make or deny a recommendation because I think the scenes here will appeal to such a narrow group of porn buyers that the cost and value-for-money proposition aren't really relevant. The scenes are a bit creepy, theyre well-acted and they have some hot models. But on the other hand there are only 12 scenes. Im glad I joined and if the site ever adds new scenes Ill likely rejoin. If youre tastes run to this niche you should have a look.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 8 videos
- Three available download resolutions
- Rough sex fantasy (with full expressed consent)
- Fresh models
- Photos available
- TBP discount (if you join through the network)
Cons:
- Small site
- Hasnt updated in over a month
- Photos by singles only, no zips
Bottom Line:
Prospective members take note! Teen Creeper is affiliated with the Fetish Network and my membership to FN gives me access to several new sites on that network, including Teen Creeper. Thats important because joining Teen Creeper costs $39 USD but TBP has a discount on the network for $29 USD.
Even though Ill assume that anyone reading this would likely join through the network to get more porn for less money I wont turn this into a review of the full Fetish Network. I posted a review of the network last year and only scored it at 65. Had I just joined the network now I might score it at 70 to account for the addition of a few new sites that are a big improvement over the older sites but the flaws with the older sites remain: they no longer update and the file resolutions are low.
One major improvement over the older sites is file resolution. Teen Creeper offers three download resolutions that reflect what youd normally expect in a commercial site like this. The scenes are available in Hi (1920x1080, 8000kb/s), Medium (1280x720, 6000kb/s) and SD (854x480, 2000kb/s). Framerates are 23fps on all resolutions. The scenes look good on a 24 monitor and a 50 TV.
There are currently only eight scenes available on the site. Thats the bad news. The worse news is that the site hasnt updated in over a month and since it is one of the newer sites on the network I had high hopes to see regular updates. It seems those hopes were misplaced.
Teen Creeper is no different from the other newer sites on the network in that they all share the same theme of domination/submission, rough sex and forced sex. This site is not for fans of couples-oriented porn. Teen Creeper has the specific theme of a young girl (18-22) in her home, her back yard or by her pool while she is being stalked by a creeper in a hoodie. The creeper calls or texts and frightens the girl and then he sneaks up and forces himself on her. So its pretty much a scene involving a four letter word starting with r that means the criminal act of forcing someone to have sex. But this is just fantasyAs you might expect, the sex tends to be rough. To ensure that any viewer fully understands that these scenes arent reality each scene ends with a brief interview of the model where she makes it clear that her and her partner were acting and everything was consensual.
The site is only a couple of months old so the models are some of the freshest popular girls working today. Thats a definite plus to the site.
The site (and network) allows download managers to queue-up scenes but it doesnt allow downloads to stop and resume. File sizes are under 2GB for the highest resolution so that shouldnt be a serious problem for many.
Photos are available but they are not zipped. Given that this is a video site I doubt that will be a deal-breaker for many.
A value-for-money or an overall recommendation is hard to pin down on this site but Im going to give it a qualified recommendation. For someone who likes rough sex videos this site may be worth considering as long as you consider that the site is small and not (apparently) updating. Its also worth considering that if you join the network, especially is it is your first time, you have access to other similar sites which increase the overall value of the membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network based around multiple fetishes.
- I'll go out on a limb and say this is a network with sites that used to be standalone. The big draw for me was Jerkoff Instructors. It's on here, hasn't updated since 2015, but I lost this content in an accidental hard drive purge. I don't remember it being part of a network when I was a member before.
- You're sure find something you like on this network and probably something that offends you too.
- One of the prettiest, best laid-out sites I've ever seen, but sometimes it does run slow and takes awhile to load.
- There's new updates, but it's not exactly easy to find them.
- Download speeds are very good.
- Goofy, campy porn. Kind of reminds me of 90s porn except they're really trying to convince you of the scene. It's a nice change of pace.
- Pretty models throughout the network.
Cons:
- Where in the hell are the new updates? I have to scan through every single site to find the newest scene from each site. It's not exactly the most user-friendly site.
- You kind of feel like there's a really rich 19 year old who owns this network. He sees October on the calendar and says, "Lets do a Halloween themed site!" Then it stops updating after 8 updates.
- Got me to join for a month, but no new updates on Jerkoff Instructors will stop me from joining again.
Bottom Line:
A few years ago, a site named Jerkoff Instructors became one of my favorite sites. It's a site that features pretty models, sometimes in hose (no panties), stockings (with panties), leggings (no panties). The models then tease, strip, sometimes masturbate and talk dirty to the viewer. It's good content. It's even now fairly unique content. You not only get the tease, panties, see-through hose fetishes in there, but also get the dirty talk fetish too. That was my reason for joining this network. I cleaned out my hard drives last year and mistakenly deleted all of the Jerkoff Instructors content. Bought myself a 4 TB external recently and wanted to add this content back.
The annoying thing about this network is it has a lot of potential. Someone working on this network has a pretty impressive programming background. The site is pleasant to your eyes, content loads as you scroll and they go for high production values, but they have ADD. No direction. No consistency. It really reminds me of that rich kid in college who is extremely smart and talented, but can't make up his mind on what he wants to do. An enigma, if you will.
Several of the sites try to take the angle of the dominating male against teen girl, but they're not rough enough to make it that believable and they're not offensive enough to make it believable either. And the girls are in no more danger than they should be, but they can't even act enough to convince you they are.
I can't really complain about their quality though. They have some 4K scenes, again, I don't have a 4K monitor so those don't matter to me, but they're there.
The majority of the sites do look similar to Kink sites. And are named like Brazzers sites, Teens in Woods, Teen Creeper, Helpless Teens, Brutal Pickups, but that's not to say there's nothing here worth looking at.
I not only appreciated being able to get all of my Jerkoff Instructors content back, but I also found their Footjob Addict site to be very good in a dying niche (It no longer updates either). Strap On Squad is another one I like. It's kind of like Kink-level lesbian scenes, but it stopped updating in September.
I should mention there's lots of tattoos on the models. I've been up and down the debate on tattoos on models and really don't mind them, but I know some people do.
This is my opinion on how to enjoy this network. You have to spend an hour or so finding the sites you like on the network. Once you do that, you can just select the site and download what you want. Until you do that, the network as a whole is a navigational mess. Down the whole main members page is a section for each site with a couple of the site's scenes. Up top in the navigational bar there's a tab for "sites", that's the most useful one. You can then go through each site and find the content you like. If you click "all videos" instead of all of the videos opening up with newest ones first, which is what 99% of sites do, you get a dropdown menu that asks what kind of video are you looking for. The choices are for example:
UHD - Teens,
HD - Bondage, Teens, Foot Fetish, Maledom, Femdom SD - Pretty much the same as the HD ones with a few more added.
If I click "all videos", why is there a dropdown selection box? Shouldn't "all" videos come up? It's again, frustrating. So just stick to using that "sites" tab and go about navigating the network that way.
There's also problems with the way the sites are counted/listed. Just a short explanation:
On the main page it shows 11 sites.
Near the bottom of the main page it shows 15 sites.
On the "sites" tab it shows 46 sites.
Get it together people. I tried to find some kind of logical reasoning behind the differences, but there's not any. Jerkoff Instructors is listed on all three of those locations and it's not updating, so it's not as if the "featured" sites or "top" sites are just newer sites that are updating.
Having complained pretty much throughout this review might make it sound really bad, but if you use that "sites" tab, you'll find quite a bit of unique content that you'll rarely see in this high of a number in quantity. Which should be their selling point to new members. A lot of the sites don't update anymore, but the content a lot of the sites have is content you rarely see. I ended up downloading over 75 GB in 3 weeks, which is quite a bit more than I've been downloading from other sites, at least recently. There's content here that I looked at and thought, "I might want to see that niche one day. I've not seen it anywhere else." I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone looking for mainstream content. The newer stuff is more mainstream, but the older stuff is where the value is.
I would recommend it to anyone who liked the Jerkoff Instructors since you can get all of its content here. Also those who are looking for something different. To me, it's a safe join for one month, but wouldn't recommend anything more than that.
Apart from kink.com, there are not many high quality bdsm sites available. For some reason, those sites are either insanely expensive, or they are offering low quality videos... or both. Fetish Network looks like a real exception to this, so I decided to give it a try.
The network is offering a bunch of different sites, each one focusing on one specific type of fetish: bdsm (doh!), spanking, smothering, brutal castin etc. However, many of those sites are dead, just a few of them are updated more or less frequently.
Navigation
The sites are all looking pretty similar, plain black/red layout, lots of stuff to click. Although the design is not as stylish as you could expect it to be in 2016, it does it's job. Browsing is the main issue. There is NO model directory! If you are looking for a specific model, you have to brwose thorugh the entire network update history to find her. Oh, there is a search bow, where you can enter the model's name, but unfortunately, it doesn't work.
Videos
Videos are coming in four different types (streaming or download)
-UDHD 4320p
-Full HD 1080p
-HD 720p
-SD 576p
A 16 minute UDHD video is about 1,5GB large, the corresponding 1080p video just takes 300MB of your hdd. Wait... 300MB for a 16 minute 1080? Right, that's what it is.
Surprise: the "UDHD" videos are actually 720p videos. This is simply cheating and false advertising!
Download
The second big issue I had with this network is the download speed. Sitting on a pretty healthy 60mbit pipe, I managed to get a whopping 200kb/s download speed on all videos, which means a 2 hour download for a 1,5GB file. I though the 90ies are over... little did I know.
Bottom line
This network is wasting a lot of potential. It could be a real alternative to the allmighty kink empire, but the drawbacks are just way too serious to make this happen. For now, my recommendation is to stay away.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network (44 sites, close to 4000 scenes)
- Wide range of fetish niches covered
- TBP discount
- Updates often
Cons:
- Scene resolutions mislabelled
- Most sites no longer update
- Many scenes are repetitive with a specific site
- Download speeds drop off occasionally during every download
- Huge gap between top resolutions
- Can only advance through the almost 100 pages four at a time (but there is a work-around)
Bottom Line:
This is a difficult network to write a detailed review on because its so large and covers a wide range of fetishes. In some ways thats good, but in other ways it means that many members will find a lot of scenes that they have no interest in.
By no measure is this a small network. There are currently just under 4000 videos spread across 44 sites and those sites cover a broad range of fetishes and offer some subtle differences between the sites within a fetish. The number of sites and the fetishes available are:
17 BDSM / Bondage (sites with coercion, kidnapping, rope, devices, amateur, etc.)
2 teen (brainwashing, step-siblings)
3 spanking
6 femdom
2 footdom
5 smothering
3 smoking
1 Taboo (step-father step-daughter)
3 legs and nylons
1 jerk-off instructions (Seriously? Maybe Im unique, but I think I have that pretty much under control)
1 girl-girl domme
The update schedule is erratic as sometimes there is a new video uploaded every day but sometimes it can be three or four days between an upload. It should also be noted that not all sites update so if you join for one specific you may not see regular updates at that favorite site for weeks as the updates are spread among all the active sites.
Mbaya did a review of one of the sites on this network (Brutal Castings which you should read even if you have no interest in that specific site but are thinking of joining the network) and noted that this site was very repetitive. I agree with mbaya and can report that this is an issue with several of the s active sites. Brutal Castings is probably the worst for being repetitive, but it isn't alone.
While no one can argue that the network offers quantity, quality may be an issue for many. The first videos on the site were posted back in 2007 so no one is expecting 2015 standards for these, but they should be better than what they are. For even newer videos many of them are only available in lower resolutions.
A beef Ive had with several sites recently is that they have a wide chasm between the two top resolutions available. To make matters worse here though, the stated resolutions are far off what is really offered. The newest videos boast an available resolution of 4320p (does that exist yet?) which are actually 1920x1080 with bitrates that vary from 3000-9000kb/s. The next resolution available on newer scenes is billed as 1080p but those only come in at 960x540 and 1500 kb/s. Apart from false promises, this is a wide chasm between resolutions and for someone like me who likes to split the difference between appearance and file size this makes for a tough choice.
Slightly older videos (2013) still say theyre 4320p but come in at 1280x720. By 2012 the best offered in 800x450 at 1500kb/s. By 2009 and older the resolutions range from bad to worse. Unless you really have a thing for a specific fetish these older videos are generally very poor quality.
Two things worth noting are that you can only advance the page views by four at a time, so if youre looking to go to page 50 of 94 youll be in for a lot of clicking and waiting. The good news though is that you can enter a page number on the URL and go directly to a page. A site shouldnt make you have to find a work-around just to advance multiple pages though.
The other issue is a bit more of a problem. On every video I downloaded I faced this problem. It occurred throughout my membership and occurred regardless of the time of day or day of the week that I downloaded: the video download speeds varied from very fast to abysmal during EVERY download. I would see speeds as high as 25MB/s and they would drop to 14kb/s for times during the download. Overall, the time to download a scene was about average even with the speeds dropping off occasionally.
One point that may be of interest to some is that the network site called Taboo Sex Diary is done by the same crew that now has the Desperate Pleasures site. For me, who likes the incest theme, this is good news. But the bad news is that these are possibly the lowest quality videos on the site, even though theyre dated 2014. My guess is that they were shot a while ago and only uploaded in 2014. Even though the thumbnails are branded as HD, the best resolution available on this site is 480x270 at 700kb/s. I guess their definition of HD is different from mine.
As for a recommendation, Im really on the fence here. Some of the scenes are good if youre into the specific fetish but thats all this site has going for it. There is a TBP discount but considering the full price is $40 and the discount price is $30 its still expensive. I realize that fetish material is more expensive to make, but other sites do it better for the same fees. The deal-breaker for me though is the low scene resolutions on many of the scenes. My advice is that unless there is a site, niche or scene you cant live without youre better off spending your porn dollars elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best quality video download option is 4320p 8000k. This is considerably better than the usual 1080 HD.
- Photos come in at 1920x2880 Exceptionally sharp and clear. There is a photoset for each video.
-Updates are once a week, which is fine for a specialty niche site.
-There is a discounted monthly join price of $14.95 through the TBP link. This is not mentioned on TBP.
-Part of a network of 46 BDSM/spanking/fetish websites.
Cons:
-Very repetitious. Each scene is a clone and all that changes is the model. A few times the male talent changes, but mostly it is the same man over and over. The same set, the same dialog, the same action.
-There are so far only 20 videos. A year from now this site will be MUCH bigger.
-The photos are screen caps and there is no zip download option.
-Nearly every model has tattoos and some have a lot. This is a major turnoff for me.
-Much of the network is no longer updating. Those sites have been dormant for some time and have very low, unwatchable quality videos. I found the network of little value.
Bottom Line:
Before I say anything further, I want to thank fellow PUer Pyrenees for mentioning this site. Without him I would not have known that this site existed. He is truly a man of vast knowledge about porn.
Just so it is clear where I am coming from, I am not a fan of BDSM or fetishes. I do like forceful sex though. The BDSM seen here is no comparison in roughness to some sites, in fact it is BDSM done rather lightly. Kink does much harder scenes. As far as rough sex I would say it is at the mid level and no comparison to many harder sites, for example Face Fucking/Facial Abuse.
Every scene follows the same scenario, even at times the same script. The model comes for an interview. There is a very tame casting tape and then there is a lengthy discussion as to what she wants for her future in modeling. She is asked to strip down to her bra and panties. At that point she refuses to take those off and the casting agent gets agitated and ties her hands with rope he conveniently has in his back pocket. He then takes off her bra and panties, He fingers her and forces her to suck his cock, followed by vaginal. There is never any anal on this site.
The scenes are generally quite passionless. In the PU website review by AK he states that Those concerned with the reality aspects will be happy to hear that the acting isnt good enough to make anyone think that the scenes arent completely choreographed. The models never act surprised and generally just go with the flow as events unfold.
The reason that I mention this is that Ava Taylor has stated that her scene here convinced her to leave porn. In that scene, she shows a degree of discomfort, but never surprise. She has claimed that she was lied to by the site ownership and that it was to be a simple blow job scene. This may be true, as I just dont know. All I see is a scene where she is passively just very accepting of whatever is happening. Next issue. If they lied to her then what about the other models? In some other scenes the models sometimes seem into the action, agreeing by saying Yes Master and Ok I will do what you want. In some scenes the models seem emotionally uninvolved and passive. Do they lie to models as to what to expect during their scenes? It is unclear. Apparently they told them something about what to do as the scenes are virtually choreographed clones.
I would have given the site a higher score, but there are two major negatives. With only 20 videos it is simply too small. The other negative is the number of tattoos to be found here. There is enough ink to write a book.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
Cons:
The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of gorgeous models - like Layla Jade, Cherokee, and Amber Michaels.
- Authentic smothering action: ass smothering, breast smothering, hand-over-mouth, and foot smothering. Lots of great femdom action too.
- The girls in these videos come off as take-no-shit bitches who really get off on humiliating and choking their partners.
- High res video - 512 x 336 in wmv format.
- Long running videos - most videos run b/w 35-45 minutes.
- Video quality (camerawork, lighting, audio) is excellent.
Cons:
- Could be more high resolution photo sets.
- I would prefer a better video format for tube-style viewing.
Bottom Line:
I love facesitting and smothering, and Pure Smothering offers some of the best video in the niche that I've seen. Lots of beautiful babes, and they really seem to get off on the humiliation and domination of their partners. There's no sexual contact (no oral sex, no penetration); nothing but breath-play, asphyxiation, ass worship, smothering and facesitting. Real attention to the fetish. I think it's definitely worth the discounted membership price, plus you get access to a full network of other fetish sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very hot models.
- Very focused on the smoking content - basically the camera runs on the girl while she chainsmokes, she strips, and masturbates, etc.
- There is some sex - smoking + blowjobs + HOT!
- Large videos (480 x 320), with no DRM.
- Lots of content in the members area.
- Part of larger network of fetish sites - 30 for one price.
Cons:
- Camera work is poor, and some videos have audio trouble.
- No still photos - only captures.
- Videos are in WMV format - I prefer flash videos now.
Bottom Line:
There are lots of very sexy models on this site: smoking their brains out, sitting around in lingerie, chatting on the phone, stripping, masturbating. Very nice. The camera work tries to capture some artistry of smoking girls bathed in sunlight, clouded in smoke, etc., but it sometimes misses the mark. Overall, the girls are quite hot, and the videos are large and plentiful enough for me to overlook some minor audio problems, etc.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of fetish videos.
- Lots of different fetish niches - bondage, femdom, spanking, face sitting, asian bondage, old-school bondage, amateurs, etc. There's a real focus on and love for the fetish itself, as pornol0ver noted. I really appreciated it in the bondage vids.
- They add new sites to their network every month.
- Newer sites have mp4 streaming videos.
- Updates every day.
Cons:
- Hard to search across the network. Outside of the blog, there's no search function at all; you have to comb through the galleries to find what you want.
- Some non exclusive stuff.
- Older videos are of poorer quality.
- Some sites aren't of any interest to me as a bondage fetish fan (such as the mature site or the big boobs site).
Bottom Line:
I think I got a great deal signing up for Fetishnetwork.com. They're up to almost 30 sites in their network, and are heavily into bondage and spanking, which I love. Their older sites need to be updated, but their newer sites feature big, fast streaming videos in mp4 format. If you're into bondage and fetish content, I think this is an excellent value for the dollar.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-adding new sites at least once a month
-lots of real women appearing in the videos, not all fake models
-very authentic bondage scenes, esp. Rick Savage and Shibari Dolls
-The focus of the sites are on the fetish, not the sex ie - getting a very good bdsm scene with genuine pussy and nipple torture, spanking and flogging - expending the energy on the kinky stuff, not rushing through the bondage and the punishment just to get to the sex.
-Lots of really kinky sites for a reasonable price
-Video Quality is improving with newer sites released ie. shibaridolls and according to the Fetish Network support people, all of the older video is going to get recoded to higher quality
Cons:
-Some extraneous sites that don't really fit - like old school pussies and titanic titties - not fetish related.
-would like more background info on the models
-agree with Jay G that some of the older sites have smaller, crappy videos
Bottom Line:
Best network for bdsm and spanking on a tighter budget. I love that I can get German or Japanese Bondage videos and lots of actual women appearing in the videos, not just fake tit pornstars playing dress up.
The variety is best for people who have hard fetishes, but still there's good value for people into softer fetish material like smoking or pantyhose.
The newer sites are good, and if they follow through on the overhaul of their old videos, I say Fetish Network is totally worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. This is like stumbling onto a collection of boxes of old and not-so-old fetish porn in a friend's attic, lots of interesting stuff for those interested in the darker side of porn.
2. Quantity definitely trumps quality, but the videos are perversely interesting even when they're not erotic....something for those jaded Porn Users who need a break from the erotic and are willing to walk down the dark alleys of the soul to see interesting things, often like watching a train wreck.
3. Lots of older spanking videos for collectors of classic spanking (the reason I joined).
4. Best Porn discount of $29.95/mo makes this network OK in price. Make sure you join from this site to avoid the normal $39.95/mo price.
Cons:
1. The best videos are "fair" in quality, and there are many of poor quality (some sites have videos that look like they were shot through a blurry blue filter).
2. Thumbnails of scenes are not very helpful, finding what's actually in the scene is a hit-and-miss thing. One needs to wade through lots of "stuff" to find anything.
Bottom Line:
Worthwhile for spanking video collectors like myself, with lots of extras, this network is a strangely interesting one and definitely not for the squeamish.
Poor quality in older scenes, it's often like an antique shop for collectors, worthwhile for those interested in the offbeat and the strange, just a dusty mess for others.
Definitely a group of niche sites, and not for everyone, this network has lots of interesting stuff for the those who want "something different."
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
