Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Still continues to be one of the best solo men sites around.
Male models are amateurs or were when filmed.
Great network for straight women and gay men.
I don’t know if this is something recent, but the network is now owned by Gamma.
Very good quality videos and pictures. You can also download all you want.
Over 500 scenes of male solo porn is a big collection, but only to first time members.
Cons:
No updates, which is now making 500 scenes seem like not that many scenes.
Solo male porn is starting to become stale to me.
Bottom Line:
This was one of my highest, if not, highest rated gay/solo men networks. All the good parts are still there, but the bad parts are being accentuated. It’s quite possibly the most basic concept in porn. A guy sits down or stands, takes his pants off and masturbates. There is nothing really wrong with it. It’s just, in my last review of this network, I mentioned the lack of plot or story, was wearing on me, but due to the network having so many solo scenes, I looked over the overall effort.
I also noted in my 2021 review, the network dropped from nearly 1,000 scenes down to 550 or so. They haven’t added much if any to their collection. In 2021, I was new to the network and impressed with such a large collection of solo male porn, but in late 2024, the large collection is maybe medium or average.
The videos are downloadable as are the photos. Both are unlimited downloads and the videos go up to HD level, while the pictures are good quality and downloadable as zip files.
Now, we are in 2024 and the excitement of finding such a large collection of solo male scenes has worn off. I’m taking a different view of the network. We have this average sized collection, especially considering it claims to have over 20 sites on it and the scenes are flat out boring and dull. I have enough experience watching female solo porn to say, I think female solo porn can get away with unexciting models and performances. If the model is pretty enough and has a nice body, maybe nothing else is needed? The models on Next Door Male are very attractive, most are muscular or masculine, maybe is a better word. But, they’re also boring, repetitive and saying the same things, if they even talk at all.
The most obvious recommendation is for people that have never joined it. You will at least get around 600 videos of solo men. I’m a two time member and while there are scenes I either missed or didn’t notice, I can’t say I’m going to be downloading anything from the network.
I will add for reference: I have not been as into male solo porn as I used to be. It’s one reason I rejoined this network. It was one of my highest rated. I wanted to see if I’m just getting tired of the niche or if it’s just the lack of progression in the niche.
It’s still as good of a collection of solo, masculine men, you will likely find on the internet. I used to not mind that the scenes were plotless and had minimal dialouge, but I do expect more now.
The way I am going to score this is to say for me, the network would be lucky to score 75, but since we are reviewing for potential members, I will still give it an 85. That is 9 points lower than I scored it in 2021. Gamma’s involvement in the network isn’t even noticeable unless you’ve joined other Gamma sites and seen the pop-up that offers a promo. Take it, it’s a good one and includes downloads.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly
Cons:
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes.
Bottom Line:
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Military-themed gay site that also has some very good solo male videos.
Updates 5 times per month (includes remasters and compilations)
Some of the guys look the part of the masculine male military stereotype.
High-definition downloads for videos and photos.
Biggest selection of gay models I have seen with around 700.
Large site with over 1,600 scenes.
Cons:
The theme doesn’t work for me.
No 4K, it is owned by Gamma, but maybe length of scenes stops the 4K downloads? Most scenes are over 30 minutes.
Not enough solo scenes
Bottom Line:
This site was recommended to me by a Porn Users member that used to regularly review gay sites. I wasn’t really for sure what to expect when I saw the military theme. That’s how the site works, too. One scene, the guys act very serious and military. The next scene, it seems more like a parody of the military. Can you get anymore parodying than two guys having doggy style on a bed while saluting the flag? I do know this theme is well-liked by gay men. It’s not that I was offended or anything like that. I just thought the change from scene to scene needed to be ironed out some. A little more consistency and either way would be fine with me.
That is a common problem I have on gay male sites. The scenes between guys don’t do much for me. Except the first 5 minutes and last minute. The guys, over 700 of them, are mostly attractive, but there is a lot of differences in their body language and believability about being gay. Most of these are quite convincing.
The solo scenes are easily my favorite and the main reason I join gay sites. This site seems to stray from the Gamma style of sites. The search works, but you only need to click one or two pages to see it’s not very accurate. I search for solo and there are 36 pages of 16 videos that show up. On the second page there are guys having sex. I believe the number of solo scenes is safe to say 250-300. This site has been around so long, some of those are dated 2001. You don’t get the Gamma quality on the videos. The resolution on the older ones has a steep drop-off. I know it’s still updating, but this seems like a site that should come with something else. I know it’s a huge site, but when you figure in the older scenes being very low quality in video resolution, it just looks like they could add this to one or two of their other gay sites. There was a feeling of I spent more money than I received quality videos. That is unusual in the gay genre. Usually you don’t get updates, but the quality is better.
What I noticed the most was the guys in the older scenes are more masculine and there’s more solo in the older scenes. I don’t know if they maybe changed their focus at some point over the last 22 years. I also feel like the site should be larger than it is. The older videos, besides being low video quality, are really short. One I downloaded was 4 minutes. There’s no real consistency in anything on this site except the military theme which does nothing for me. They have one solo video that’s 4 minutes then it goes to a solo video that is nearly 30 minutes. Why didn’t they put them in the room together?
What I am trying to say is I believe the theme is the big draw. I do think this site would score higher for a gay man that is into this theme. And that’s probably why I feel like there should be more. A network gives you multiple themes. You’re just stuck with this one theme. I don’t mean for this to be a negative review. It’s just I may need to stay away from themed gay porn.
The newest videos have from mobile to 1080p downloads. You can download the pictures which are high quality for a gay site. That also makes me think the theme is a major part of the interest in this site. I can still rate it well for doing what it’s supposed to do. Just don’t expect it to go outside the theme. I don’t know that I would recommend it if you don’t like the theme.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K
Cons:
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p.
Bottom Line:
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded.
Cons:
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network.
Bottom Line:
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen!
There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo.
Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips.
A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine.
The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation?
You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about.
Cons:
It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those.
More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows)
Bottom Line:
I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me.
The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common.
The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars?
If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very attractive, masculine-look, gay solo model.
There are only 18 solo scenes, but they do something on this site that I do enjoy and that is two guys masturbating together. Surely that really happens?
Good download quality with most of the scenes having up to 1080p
A total of 114 scenes, some of the gay sex scenes on this are good. I’m shocked by how my back arch some of these guys have.
The pictures are downloadable, but I would only say they are okay.
Cons:
I was pretty sure I had this figured out. Solo gay models are listed as solo because they are in all the scenes on their site which makes it a solo model focused site, right? Not really. This one is advertised as solo masturbation. But only 1/6 of the scenes are solo masturbation.
Nearly half the scenes are “on the set” which I know from female porn sites, are usually called, “behind the scenes”. It does cut the amount of sex scenes down some.
Bottom Line:
If there was going to be one of these solo gay models, I really wanted to be a solo masturbation model, Austin Wilde was it. He’s very handsome, he doesn’t have a too masculine look, but he looks like an athlete. He has a little bit of a rugged look. And his solo scenes are very good. I don’t know if he is that greatly endowed or if it’s where he’s so athletic looking. I know a lot about size perception. You figure this stuff out when you watch enough men masturbating in porn.
The gay sex scenes are some of the better ones on this network, at least for me. I think the whole attraction to the site is Austin Wilde. It doesn’t seem to matter whether he’s in the top or bottom role, he's almost always erect. That plays a big part in enjoying a sex scene that you really can’t even fantasize being in. I don’t know how these scenes would be viewed by gay men. I have learned a lot though I am not for sure porn fans are the best or most qualified teachers. Austin does everything. He takes anal, he gives anal, he takes oral, he gives oral. And I would say he seems to be the last “gay” of these solo models but I’m going to guess I am wrong.
His solo scenes are very good. This is how I believe a man masturbates. He’s not too preoccupied with looking good while doing it. He doesn’t spend as much time trying to show his body off. I don’t think he is that large in endowment, but I could be wrong. He’s kind of hard to tell how big his build is. He reminds me a little of Vin Diesel. I think for a female viewer there’s a good chance for the physical attraction. And he’s not as dominant acting as his build says he could be. I believe he is one of the more entertaining male models to watch masturbate. This is one of the ones I would definitely recommend for straight women. I want to believe he is well-liked by straight women and gay men. It’s just too bad there’s not more solo scenes of him. The video quality is very good. Maybe the first 10-12 scenes only have 480p downloads. The rest have up to 1080p and his scenes are a little longer. I noticed several go over 20 minutes. I liked the one a lot, but I don’t know where else to find content of him. I would like to see him in bisexual scenes with another man and a woman.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones.
Cons:
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me.
Bottom Line:
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name!
121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together.
Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution.
Pictures that can be downloaded.
Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots.
Cons:
No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women?
There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too.
The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too.
Bottom Line:
Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance.
I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex.
The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved.
The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing.
Cons:
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore?
Bottom Line:
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women.
Cons:
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper.
Bottom Line:
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features.
Cons:
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive.
Bottom Line:
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Strange bedfellows, they say: bisexual, straight, gay, hardcore, solo, guy with a guy, then with the other guy’s girl. I like it.
Not as much solo as I would like, but around 1/3 of the 323 scenes are solo. It is advertised as solo. Solo men sites are difficult to find, it’s hard not to use the word hard in a review of masturbating hard dicks.
There are pictures you can download in a zip, but only 25-50 per zip and look like screenshots.
Around 175 of the scenes have at 720p and most of those also have 1080p downloads, look for the con.
The site works well but could use more tags and search features.
Cody, himself, is very attractive, it’s hit or miss on the other guys, though the women are almost all very pretty.
Cons:
Around 150 of the scenes top out at 480p or 540p on video downloads. This site has been around a long time.
Another con that extends from a pro – the navigation can be frustrating. The tags are just not useful.
No longer updating.
Bottom Line:
The star attraction is Cody Cummings. He’s a masculine, gay, bisexual, straight male performer. And he does all those on this site. That means there are gay scenes with Cody and another guy or guys. There are bisexual scenes with Cody, another guy and a female. There are straight scenes where Cody has sex with a female and there are the scenes for us straight women – where Cody plays with himself and lets us watch. I don’t consider the scenes with women to be directed at straight women. Those are a lot like any hardcore male/female scene you can see on any site.
There is the feeling they could have done more with stories and how the scenes work together. One scene has two parts: In the first part, Cody has sex with a male. In the second part, Cody has sex with a female. It wants you to see this as the male and female being a couple and they’re having an affair on each other with Cody, but they don’t put the story together. It leaves it like these are separate scenes with very little relation to each other.
This is an older site than I realized. Nearly half of the scenes only offer 480p or 540p downloads. The other half have the HD formats at 720p and 1080p. The content doesn’t look old. I don’t know if this site normally only offers streaming (it was an option when signing up), but my membership includes downloading. The photos are not much to talk about. They are downloadable, there are not many in each set and they’re from the videos. Cody is attractive enough he should have better quality pictures and more pictures, especially of his solo scenes.
The main theme here is Cody Cummings and what looks like his sexual adventures. He does a good job of selling his preference in each video. He’s very believable in the straight scenes and solo scenes. At times, the scenes with other guys, he doesn’t seem quite as into it, but he doesn’t underperform either. There are no more updates and there are no 4K or higher videos. I think if you’re joining this site you’re doing so just because of your interest in Cody Cummings. None of the other models, including the females, really do that much. It’s very much Cody-centric. I guess that is the whole purpose of a solo model site. Just don’t expect the solo model part to be the dominant action you’re going to see. I was expecting 100% solo scenes. Overall, I’m not disappointed. It is very difficult to find a masculine, male model who masturbates on camera. He’s very good at that and should be where soon to be stars start learning the trade. I don’t know if he is kind of a pioneer in solo male porn. It’s a good site, overall.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut.
There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy.
I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn.
Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag.
The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body.
The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads.
Cons:
Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem.
No longer updating (has gay porn died?)
Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue.
Bottom Line:
To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing.
I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads.
The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym.
A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene.
A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with.
This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Look what I accidentally found! The biggest bisexual site I have joined.
279 DVDs.
The DVDs average 3-4 scenes per each one.
Attractive males and pretty females.
A lot of orgies.
Cons:
Look what I wished I hadn’t found. The list of complaints will have to go in the bottom line.
No downloads
The site pages take 3-10 seconds to load.
The streaming player is even slower and is glitchy.
The welcome email told me I have access to other sites. When I tried signing in them there’s no access.
Bottom Line:
I have said in previous reviews of bisexual sites it’s very hard to find good ones. I saw this in a Gamma promo, the price was low (under $10), the amount of content was the most I had seen. Nowhere on the join page or the promo was it mentioned there are no downloads. When I signed up the page glitched with a broken link that said, “Go to member’s area here”. I opened my email account and had two emails from them. Both said Bisexdigital in the subject, but inside the second one it said I have access to Austin Wilde. I went to that site and tried to sign in, it said no account. I went back to the other email which had a direct link to Bisexdigital. The site took forever to open. Once it did, I was able to sign into it and find out all the videos are streaming only.
The streaming player buffers every 3 seconds. The site itself takes up maybe half of my monitor. It looks like it was made in the early days of the internet.
The content looks good, but if I can’t get it to stream without constant buffering and can’t download it, what good is it?
They show having 279 movies. I do not know if they are just counting full DVDs or scenes. The Best Porn review says it has a 200GB daily download limit. The whole site says it has 403GB of videos. That makes the 279 sound like standard definition DVDs at around 1.5GB each.
I do recognize some of these scenes from my collection of bisexual scenes, but there are a lot I don’t have. I don’t know why so many bisexual sites are streaming only. Most of the content is from 8 or more years ago and is 480p in the streaming player.
They have some of the first bisexual DVDs I saw back in 2007. It’s easily the most impressive collection I have seen. With bisexual porn you already know it’s likely to be 480p, so that part is forgivable. I would be willing to pay more to have a download option. That is the main reason I’m not giving it a bad score. The scenes are good. If you’re okay with streaming these scenes are good. Bisexual porn was creative back then.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too.
Cons:
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex?
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very handsome, bisexual male who does solo, bisexual, heterosexual and gay scenes.
A total of 314 scenes with 79 being solo, the rest are a blend of hetero, bisexual and gay.
Most scenes are HD (720p or 1080p with smaller resolutions available).
Very pretty girls in the scenes that feature women. It’s rare to see bisexual threesomes with two males and a pretty woman, but the ones here are.
Photo sets can be downloaded.
The tags can be made to just apply to the content on this site so it doesn’t bring up other sites on the network.
Cons:
Seems to be a recurring theme, no longer updating.
The oldest scenes only have 480p download option.
Not much story in the scenes, especially the bisexual ones, it seems like those would be perfect for a story.
Bottom Line:
Cody Cummings is one of the few male porn stars I know by name and have always found him attractive, but I don’t know if he has retired and I’ve just been watching too many tube sites or if he has moved on to other sites. I wouldn’t know if this is true, but this is the biggest solo site I have seen of a male gay/bisexual porn star. Cody is in every scene.
I still think sites like this one help blur the line between what appeals to gay men and straight women. There are scenes with Cody and a woman. Scenes with Cody, another man and a woman. Cody with just a man or men and Cody by himself. Every site I have found that at least is trying to blur that line has stopped updating.
Cody is a muscular, very fit guy that looks like he probably had a past in sports of some kind. One part that impresses me about his scenes is he seems to really be into all of them. Even the solo ones, which could be seen as a bad thing by some since he does seem to really embrace his own attractiveness.
There are over 300 scenes, as helpful as their categories are, they don’t have one for “bisexual”. I’m going to estimate there’s maybe 30 bisexual scenes, maybe 10 hetero and around 80 solo, the rest are gay scenes, but are not always the typical gay scene. There are ones where Cody and another guy or guy masturbate together. These too are appealing to me.
The video quality on this site is good with around 250 of the scenes having at least 720p or 1080p download choices. As a whole this network – Next Door Studios – in my opinion, is as good as it gets for straight females looking for sites with males masturbating and I think Cody’s site is the best of the sites on the network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos.
Cons:
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered.
Bottom Line:
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Solo, mostly believable straight, masculine, handsome men masturbating.
The guys on here make the cumshot look like they’re painting a masterpiece.
Downloadable photos
Videos are downloadable but are all 480p.
Comes with the very good Next Door Studios Network
Cons:
The site hasn’t been updated in 12 years.
While it’s a con, only 77 scenes, that’s more solo scenes of men than I’ve seen on some men DVD sites.
Probably the most masculine men on the site and they stopped updating it.
Same location for most shoots
Bottom Line:
This was a tough site to review. It’s not easy being a straight woman trying to find porn of believably straight men masturbating. You can find them on tube sites and if you join a dating site!
This is probably the closest I’ve seen to what looks like and acts like believable straight men masturbating. There are a few of the guys that don’t seem straight, but it does look like some of these guys are watching porn while masturbating. I can convince myself they’re watching straight porn or a woman masturbating.
I can’t score it high. The video quality is maybe acceptable at 480p, there also hasn’t been an update since 2008. It does – however – make for a good site included with the Next Door Network. Especially since I know more than a few women who join gay sites looking for male masturbation videos. The size of the site with 77 scenes isn’t impressive compared to most porn sites these days, but in male solo porn, 77 scenes is an okay amount.
The pictures are okay too. Though I will say the pictures can change your mind about whether these guys are straight or not. I would recommend avoiding those for any straight women convincing themselves these are straight men.
They do fall into the same repetitious setting that I have noticed on a lot of solo men scenes. There’s been 40-50 guys that came on that couch at least put a cover over it!
When combined with Next Door Network’s “Next Door Male” you will have 650-700 solo men scenes to choose from. The other sites in the network have some solo scenes too, but most are under 15 scenes. This review also will help those females like me that has seen some of these videos on tube sites and wondered how much content the site “Stroke That Dick” has on it. Not a lot and no new updates. At least the videos are downloadable, and the much larger network brings the value up.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The Adult Time of gay porn is what I was told about this network. I think it’s owned by the same company that owns Adult Time.
It comes with 17 sites and they are currently offering a free month access to their new site NextDoorTaboo. I didn’t add it as I’m most interested in the solo scenes.
Some of the sites in the network are updating with 4K scenes, most have all the download options Adult Time has with 360p up to 1080p and all the resolutions between those.
Currently advertises 3,599 exclusive videos on the network and 1,513 models.
Has downloadable photo sets, they list them as total photos not total photo sets and have 215,509 photos currently.
Averages a new scene per day.
Cons:
I would have been happier if it were 17 sites of solo men!
The oldest scenes which include a lot of the solo scenes are from 2005 and only have 480p download option
Better use of the tags. I also see this in straight porn too. Why list “masturbation” on a scene that eventually turns into sex?
Bottom Line:
I joined this network based on a recommendation from another Porn User member. Overall, I am pleased with it. I recognized some of these guys from other gay sites I have joined. I am hoping gay sites will think about the other market they appeal to and that’s straight women who like to watch men masturbating.
They have 17 sites on the network and I’m going to review a few of those separately since they have more focus on solo men. Compared to the other gay sites or networks I have tried, this one really stands out and above the others. There are seven of the “Next Door” themed sites and seven “solo male” sites including one I am very familiar with – Cody Cummings. It also has one more site called “Stroke that Dick”.
This number surprises me since if it’s true this is by far the most solo men videos I have seen on one site. Using their search and filters it says there are 1,720 solo scenes. This is where I took some points off.
Using just their tags it shows 1,093 solo scenes. That’s still a lot more than I have seen anywhere, but it’s still an inconsistency I would rather not see happening. Even on the 1,093 solo scene results there it a second filter to filter within the results and there’s “Anal Sex (16)” listed. It just doesn’t seem like this should be that hard to say, “There’s one guy in this scene and he masturbates.”
One review I read of this network said the downloads cost extra, but they haven’t been extra for me. Even the 4K downloads come with the membership.
I did find their ads to be annoying too. When you sign in you get one of those upsell pages like a lot of straight porn sites have where it shows 9 or more sites you can add to your membership. In the member’s area, there are ads along the bottom of the screen too, but they’re not too annoying.
This is as close to a gay network that can appeal to straight women as I have found and it’s why I’m giving it the score of 94. See my individual reviews of some of the sites on the network to see which ones have the most solo or best solo scenes.
-exclusive content
-4K videos for download and streaming
-low annual cost for much content
-updated a four or more times a week
Cons:
-There are ads on the site which require you to click off
-Watch for cross checked sales when ordering
-Sometimes uses Screen Captcha for logging in
-The newer videos tend to be quite long and are of large sizes for downloading
Bottom Line:
I joined Next Door Twinks and became a member of a network called Next Door Studios. They have a sale going on through Labor Day so I figured I would give it a try as they seem to have it going. This is one time it is not a mistake!
I had heard of this site before but figured it was just models from Active Duty doing extra duty at another site. Many do scenes here but so many more models are new and exclusive to this site. The videos are quite top notch and the models range from the teen twink to the muscle military up to Daddies and Bears (oh my!)
There are over 3500 videos as well as photosets for the collector. They are culled from 17 different sites all for the price of one. The site is easy to navigate and there is a forum section for members.
I was starting to give up hope on the state of porn sites lately. It seems they are all in it for the buck and are doing whatever it takes to lower their costs and up the membership fees. That means fewer updates for us porn lovers. Not Next Door as they are still updating quite frequently with at least four a week.
I did join during a sale so it cost me $35 for 90 days. Prices are $15 a month for streaming only although one can order streaming and downloading for $120 a year. I didn't find a monthly streaming and downloading price except for when there is a sale. This keeps the site from going over 90 as it is a bit expensive. Fortunately, they do have sales quite often (especially now for Labor Day). I joined at $35 for a 90 day membership which renews at $50 for 90 days. Not bad for what you are getting.
Update: I have found streaming and download monthly memberships are available for $35
I do think the annual membership is worth it as it breaks down to $10 a month. The updates are frequent enough the viewer will get more than their money's worth at the end of the year.
As stated before, the models are hot and range from twinks to daddies to bears oh, my! They have military types as well for those with a military fetish.
The members' forum is a nice touch as many sites have gotten rid of theirs. It is good to have a place where the webmaster communicates with the members to help gauge what is popular and what is not. It also is a good place to meet people who share your same love of porn but for a certain site. Sound familiar? Maybe they see Porn Users and realize it is a good thing to know the pulse of the subscribers.
Bottom line: This site is one of the few very good sites out there. Sure, there are a few pricing problems as many don't have $120 to spend for downloads. If they do it is worth it and also worth the wait for a holiday or other sale. Highly recommended site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Original content
-Military models are mostly real
-No download limits
-Over 1000 videos available
Cons:
-Quality has gone downhill lately
-No more Wednesday updates
-Pre-checked boxes when ordering site
-Lots of ads on site for sister sites
Bottom Line:
Active Duty was the military site to go to in its day. It has been around for a very long time and started off as a military fetish studio which made VHS tapes. I had a huge collection of those tapes back in the day so I have been a fan for over thirty years.
That has changed over the years as most sites do. The main problem is this site was sold to a larger site and it shows. They do not know how special Active Duty was when it started. They know how to make high quality porn videos, but they don't have that special touch they used to have.
There still are many hundreds of older videos from days gone past to enjoy. The newer stuff is just not what it was before. They now use the same bed set-up and have the models do the same old sucking and fucking with no passion. They look like they can't wait to finish so they can get paid and get the hell out of there.
The site also seems to have dropped the Wednesday updates. They at least have a comments section and someone mentioned they saw the newer models appearing on a sister site first. However, AD has yet to inform us of this news. (I will update this review as the situation changes.)
As for cost, this site costs $15 monthly streaming only or $30 including downloads. One has to join for a few days costing $3 which makes the total $33 for one month. This seems cheap for them to make a little bit of cash while one waits to be able to download for a few days. Yearly memberships are $120 although they do have deals for a lot less.
The older stuff is a main reason to join this site these days. Much of it is in lesser resolution including videos originally available in 1080.
Many sites do this and go through periods of not having their best foot forward. They then find themselves again and are great once more. I hope AD finds their path and remember why we loved them so much in the past. Right now, asking us to pay $33 for a joyless site is asking too much.
-High quality videos
-high res photos as well
-easy to navigate
-no download limit
-updates twice a week
-hot military models
Cons:
-new owners have made the site decline the past year
-the older videos are not as good quality (not the site's fault)
-many videos are over 40 minutes long (not always a bad thing)
-some streaming problems of late for some reason.
-older photosets in low def
-there are some videos in which the older owner rubs the boys which is a bit creepy
-the site has since added where one must prove they are not a spambot each time they log in
-watch for other companies secretly checked when ordering.
Bottom Line:
If one is looking for a military site, look no further than Active Duty. The videos done now are all HD and look great on the TV screen. The models are almost always among the hottest out there.
The above applied for the longest time but the site is under new ownership by a company that has dozens of sites. The feel of the original Active Duty has left the building as new directors try to copy what made the original so good. AD is not a bad site by any means, but it could use a lot of improvement.
One can buy DVDs from the older stuff as well on the site or just join and download the scenes you like. Viewing the videos first is also easy to do and in great quality.
The amount of videos available is quite large and there are many types of military men to look for. If you like em beefy, lean, tattooed, cut, uncut, big dicked, etc you will find them here.
One of the negatives is some of the videos has the site owner touching the models which is a bit creepy and distracting. I know he wants to show us he can touch the hot boys, but it is a big turn off.
The guys are hot and so are most of the scenes available. So to get your soldier to stand at attention, join this site!
Updated to add:
I hate to edit a review to knock it down a few points. I do really like Active Duty but it has started a few things lately. First, they treat each member as a spambot and we must always log in with those letters that can be hard to see.
The second problem is secretly checked sites. I now have to go to my bank and get a charge dropped off as it was checked somehow when I renewed Active Duty. This has never happened before at AD and I wonder if it is the wave of the future for other sites.
From now on, any site that has extra sites checked will be automatically deducted ten points from my full review. This is a problem most of us porn fans do not like and needs to be stopped.
Canceling the site is a bit of an ordeal these days thanks to the new owners. You have to go through chat as someone tries to sell you more sites.
Overall, a good site that can do so much better. It is a shell of its former self but has shown a few signs of improvement. Now if we can get the new owners to read the comments...
-many videos are over 40 minutes long (not always a bad thing)
-photosets in low def
-there are some videos in which the older owner rubs the boys which is a bit creepy
-the site has since added where one must prove they are not a spambot each time they log in
-watch for other companies secretly checked when ordering.
Bottom Line:
If one is looking for a military site, look no further than Active Duty. The videos done now are all HD and look great on the TV screen. The models are almost always among the hottest out there.
One can buy DVDs as well on the site or just join and download the scenes you like. Viewing the videos first is also easy to do and in great quality.
The amount of videos available is quite large and there are many types of military men to look for. If you like em beefy, lean, tattooed, cut, uncut, big dicked, etc you will find them here.
One of the negatives is some of the videos has the site owner touching the models which is a bit creepy and distracting. I know he wants to show us he can touch the hot boys, but it is a big turn off.
The guys are hot and so are most of the scenes available. So to get your soldier to stand at attention, join this site!
Updated to add:
I hate to edit a review to knock it down a few points. I do really like Active Duty but it has started a few things lately. First, they treat each member as a spambot and we must always log in with those letters that can be hard to see.
The second problem is secretly checked sites. I now have to go to my bank and get a charge dropped off as it was checked somehow when I renewed Active Duty. This has never happened before at AD and I wonder if it is the wave of the future for other sites.
From now on, any site that has extra sites checked will be automatically deducted ten points from my full review. This is a problem most of us porn fans do not like and needs to be stopped. Now!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- video in both wmv and mp4, with several resolutions, including iphone and ipod ones, streaming and downloading. Full HD for the latest.
- nice guys enjoying a good time with beautiful models, which they treat respectfully as women. Not the usual bullying of current porn, where women are humiliated in many a way.
- no anal. For me, this is a pro...
- navigation by model and category, although you can only do this from the home page.
- gives access to the whole Next Door Pass network (14 additional sites).
- full access trial
Cons:
- older videos are only wmv, and only the newest are HD.
- photos, but no screencaps, and no zips, you'll have to load and download them one by one.
- cannot use a download manager. No "save as" link, but you have to click to start the download.
Bottom Line:
Next Door Pass is mainly a gay multisite network, but Next Door Hookups is the exception in the network, being an heterosexual only site.
Nevertheless, there is also bisexual or heterosexual content in all of the gay sites, so even if you only want heterosexual content, don't forget to take a look also to the gay sites.
The site has an unusual characteristic: few models, with lots of scenes from each model. I can recognize many a canadian model, so I guess it's a canadian company.
I like canadians a lot, and specially many of the models you can find here, so it's great to find 5-10 scenes of one of these girls. Besides, you may find another 5-10 scenes of the same girl through the rest of the sites, the gay ones.
So this is what you should consider first, before suscribing to this site: do you like models such as Coco Velvet, Kelly Summers, India Summer, Ruby Knox, Madison Mason o Reena Sky? Because you are going to find LOTS of scenes from these girls. If you like them, this is your opportunity. Otherwise, if you are looking for many girls with just one or two scenes for each, you should look elsewhere. I happen to like those particular girls a lot, so for me the site is great.
And I like specially the kind of action you find here. For some reason, these gays treat women much better than most of the bullying male porn performers which abound in other sites.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
