Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: graymane (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1411)  |   Threads Started (119)

551-600 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 11 Page 12 13 16 19 22 28 29 Next Page >

01-17-13  10:13pm - 4357 days #7
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Alfred Hitchcock, eat your heart out!

The best, if not one of the best nature films I've had the pleasure of seeing. Many thanks, JB.

01-16-13  11:45pm - 4358 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by alfie111:


Just read a blog post about 3D. Kind of dumb but I wanted to know what everyone thought about it. Gimmicky or immersive? Or too immersive?

Think about it.


They're further along futuristic innovations than we think, alfie .... and 3D might hav'ta do some catch-up just to keep up.
My money is on Virtual transfer, wherein feel, touch, smell, as well as other important sensory wonders packaged and geared to heighten ultimate sexual stimuli (via perhaps some sort of electrolytic energy ) to those who'll shell-out the mullah required to join the lift-off.
Putting you in bed with your favorite porn star and giving you the joys of havin' your way with her might just be over the horizon, oh ye faithful.

01-14-13  10:57pm - 4360 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I'm definitely leaning to your corner on this one, JB.
They (tube sights)serve a very useful purpose for a lot of people, and for those who have success using them the payoff can be abundantly satisfying.
I say that with a caveat, because if you aren't tuned into their modus operandi, I've found usually by the time you're getting started, you might then discover they've subtley introduced, and brought along and some of their friends, the result of which you might find your browser AWOL and tool bar on overload with add-ons. My point: there's no free lunch here either.

Overall, though, if one can navigate and/or outwit tubers with the skill as have our discerning thread-master here has so impressively done, ... then the man Gets no "flax" from me.

Having said that, should we take JB's gracious advice and examine the links he has so thoughtfully provided, then a positive response would give me pleasure squelching any downside I might've conveyed. Edited on Jan 14, 2013, 11:12pm

01-13-13  10:58pm - 4361 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
For starters ....
Veronica Zemanova (a body molded by the Gods)

Oh, you did ask for ten!

OK..... very simple. Just multipy Veronica by ten.

01-12-13  02:06pm - 4362 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I'm rather surprised not more hasn't been offered relating to this thread that would expanded to what I can only describe (for lack of it's actual credentials) as "sensory sex" ......
Simply put, One is provided some sort of head-gear that tunes him into a 3-D cyber scenario wherein he's actually experiencing real-time sexual action with his favorite porn star. Sounds mind-blowing!

Needless to say, I suspect venturing into a program of this nature is far-an-away different from the industry's garden-variety subscriptions we review and talk about here -- naturally from a cost perspective and it's touted, sensory innovations.

So..... anybody know much about this phenomenon?

01-12-13  01:31am - 4363 days #44
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by gaypornolover:


Great idea for a thread!

As you'll see, I have very unusual tastes in men, as I'd like to see...

John Boehner (let's face it his last name sounds close enough to "Boner" so he's halfway there already!)

Billy Gardell from "Mike and Molly" - so much man to love!

Billie-Joe Armstrong from Green Day - had a crush on him since I was a teen and he "came out" as bisexual some years ago too!

Matt LeBlanc from "Friends" and "Joey".

and finally

Ed O'Neill from "Married With Children".

That would be one hot group scene!


Another interestingly amusing and thought provoking post from our valued Gay member, who, as always, adds substance and, certainly importantly, the kind of perspective we can only get from one of the Gay persuasion.

01-10-13  03:24am - 4365 days #39
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


I was thinking last night how wonderful it would be if the mainstream producers and distributors were able to give us high production value, regular movies with overt sex left in, if the story calls for it. No, I am not talking NC-17, because even in those movies great care is taken to hint at sex rather than show it.

Be it thrillers, sci-fi, dramas, comedies. Just have a good story with the sexual element left in, be it five minutes or a bit more or maybe even less, depending,

It would be so much more erotic than a flimsy story that invariably leads to 22 minutes of sex within five minutes, as is the case with most "adult" movies.

One could always use body doubles if the stars refused to do a scene like that. A truly ADULT high quality movie shown at the Cineplex ... what a dream! Darn those censors. It could have been that way if it hadn't been for them. As a matter of fact Hollywood started that way and then got suppressed by the prudes.


Dang, you went and stole my thunder, big guy.
excellent post you presented, as usual.

I was there with the introduction of erotism in cinema ... seen it gingerly dance around censorship, putting on screen all the law would allow (but still sorely lacking).
Walking a tightrope between religious nay-sayers and the Fifth Admendment flag-waver's demand for more freedom to watch what one wants.
Pushed inexorably against a wall of compromise, the opposing forces ultimately caved -- as already the adult book stores was setting' up shop -- therein bringing suppression slightly to its knees, setting the pace to where we are today.

A thorn in the side relating to adult theaters during that time, was the recrutement of unseen in-house snoopy dogs, whose badge of authority was solely one in which to sneak up on mastubators. Those nabbed were lucky if only thrown out, the unlucky facing possibility of arrest. Heaven forbid one who seats himself wearing an overcoat or raincoat.
It wasn't uncommon for these assholes to shakedown somebody they suspected or caught wanking. Better the wanker hand over a wad of cash rather than be escourted down town. Edited on Jan 10, 2013, 04:14am

01-08-13  03:12pm - 4366 days #26
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Capn:


Classic beauties in their day:

Lauren Bacal, Jayne Mansfield, Sophia Loren, Gina Lolabrigida, Brigitte Bardot.


I'm smack-dab right on your wavelength Capn .....I couldn't agree with you more.
Lauren simply dripped sexuality and was the more sultry of your picks > remember the line: "you know how to whistle, don't you, just pucker up your lips and blow."

Sophia???? I'd donate an organ to see her in porn.
I dreamed one night I was feasting on those incredibly incomparable boobs she's so gifted with ...... my face was buried in her cleavage and I was chomping away....... upon awakening hours later, I discovered almost half of my pillow was missing.

Jane Mansfielf..... wow! There's enough spent semen from the hands of her male fans to form an ocean.

Gina and Brigitte are both desirably smoldering beauties who's naughty, suggestive talent for exuding sex appeal has left an indelable mark everywhere they tread.
I wished it was a path to my bedroom.
If those two could've adopted porn in their day, and stepped into the ranks of porn as we see it today, can you imagine the stir it would make??????

Then again, after we see them naked in the roles today's porn models are starring in, do you suppose the momentary shock just might knock the wind outta their sails and all we're seeing is just another porn queen doing her job.

And that brings up a salient point ......How long would any of these celebs mentioned throughout this thread maintain any popularity they have, or would gain, once they've walked through Hell's gates of hardcore porn?
I think the word "jaded" might be the operative we can expect relating to an answer.

01-07-13  05:09pm - 4367 days #16
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Impressive lineup so far.

I'd offer up a few, myself .....BUT:
Albeit frozen in memory, I'm afraid most of those on my list are buried somewhere in Tinsel-Town.

There is, however, my early fantasy fav. (Kim Novak)

I wonder if she'd consider comin' out of retirement?

01-07-13  04:30pm - 4367 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


As someone once wrote, specifically about the U.S. public but the same would apply elsewhere: we publicly abhor and privately adore porn.


Priceless.
Thanks RA for lettin' this little Genie out the bottle.

01-06-13  02:33pm - 4368 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
The saying goes ......
"What's old is new again"
Do'ya S'pose that could mean another Victorian Era is just around the corner?

01-05-13  09:18pm - 4369 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I don't know enough about Russian porn to really throw myself into this issue, but the fact Russia is sitting on such a massive source of oil, natural gas, as well as an abundance of other natural resources, and whose economy and influx of trade is making strides in leaps and bounds ....... then on a wild guess, could it be they don't need, nor further want the stigma and fat revenues here-to-fore that's being poured into the country from the sex trade?

01-05-13  02:06pm - 4369 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Ella, the absolute and crowning favorite of mine, (who, abides and films in Russia, and makes up one of the three "Fame-Girls,") has been doing a series of non-nude pics from the time she was well under-age until now, @ age 18.

I trust this news Denner have brought us will have no effect on the continued progress of this series.
I did a review of this site, currently posted under my bio and highly recommended.

Thanks, denner, (as it is your practice) for again giving us another important breaking news event.

01-04-13  03:54pm - 4370 days #19
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Well GM, I know a guy that was 82 and had three lady friends
lived with one and dated two others. He had some little blue pills and made the best off it.

I am settled down and live a tame life, have the typical home, and family stuff. The days of alcohol and hotel rooms and is behind me. I settled down for a few reasons one was I saw others get around my age and things start to catch up on you as you get older. So eased all that up and have not even had a drink in near 10 year.


I try and be humble and grateful for live in general and blessed that I woke up today and many didn't puts a perspective ya know ?


Quite an eloquent piece of work there, young man. The mini-Bio you volunteered said a lot about your character.... not to mention bringing to our attention how nice it would be if more of us here at PU had an avenue to open up a little more.

Timely story you presented about the 82 year old guy , and his three girlfriends. Gratitude from thee for that sage innuendo. I shall think about that should this lifetime again permit me this kind of opportunity.

Worth noting, however, is that even during my young adult years, I found even one woman too many to offer adherence to either/and/or a spartan, ongoing compatible union befitting alliance worthy of her station in a relationship with me ..... so, any more babes who would crash the party would likely be more than I could handle (at one time.)

As far as connubial bliss is concerned, we can conclude your's is as close as it gets .....
spelled: s-u-c-ce-s-s.

01-03-13  10:42pm - 4371 days #36
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Capn:


Yes, I really don't care for obsessive gyno close ups.

IMO it is much nicer to see most or all of the lady concerned.
Cap'n.


Every time I see where you rail on the shortcomings of excessive Gyno closeups (ugh) and esp. your superb arguments supporting angle-shots, you are then getting my wild (unseen) applause.
So.....
Hang in there comrade ...... bet on the fact you have more people than you think joining us in this important pursuit.

01-03-13  09:20pm - 4371 days #17
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Hey GM, as I just crossed the half century mark last year accomplishing stuff just seems like part of life. Ya we had a band back in the late 1970's in the SF bayarea. Was a good time and place to have a band. I am sure many people on here have talents and such we just don't share cause we see porn as the connection mostly. But yep there is allot of stuff to do in 50 years LOL. I guess I just never think of all I do or did, just try and live life and enjoy it best I can.


Well good for you, CT ...... < closest icon in our smiley selection to represent your deserved drum roll >
I envy you, my good man.
On a collision course with the big 80 destined to make it's unwelcome, mandatory annual visit again this year ..... I'd hafta say, I can only wish I'd'a made some similar choices that you've made -- rather than nourishing a fatal void by instead exercising a priority obsession directed at pursuing, possession, and ultimately full and total sexual surrender to as many lovely lassies that I could wedge into my lifetime.
Alas, the victories gift granted all women, which divides the odds, and generally always favor winning the war of the sexes ........pussy.

01-02-13  11:19pm - 4372 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


GM,
( back in the day in our band I was the lyricist)
I guess some left overs run outta my head sometimes LOL

But I will try and remember to think of it.


Are you saying, CT, that in the past you were associated with a band and writing songs? Coooool!

Indulge me if you will, here.
All this ......
Begs the question: (Time allotment in question) He'd you juggle the following? (1) your day job (2) serious gun collection (3) your music obligations? (4) your ravenous appetite for porn? ... and (5) women and/or relationships> the volume of which must'a been overwhelming considering band members are seemingly women's most potent aphrodisiac?

In conclusion .....
Any more exciting things in your seemingly full life you'd care to share wih us, CT? Good stuff. This is better than my collection of Wonder Woman comics ...... (almost) I have the porn version, don't you know?

01-02-13  10:04pm - 4372 days #11
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
To hopefully answer CT's previous question and elaborate on the point I now think Drooler is making here, I'll just jump in midstream and pick up on where we are now, as it has to do with the subject of "pussies" -- more specifically, whether to stretch and/or spread .... or not to stretch and/or spread.

For what its worth, and predictably perceived as unpopular among the more youthful and upbeat crowd, let me say unequivocally ..... and I can't stress this any more strongly, I THINK EITHER OF THE TWO LATTER (said) MENTION ABLES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO PORN ARE DUMB, DUMB, AND DUMBER.
I put the sight of the lips of an out-stretched vagina almost in the same class as closeups of male's hairy asses whilst humping his partner.

Moreover, count me among the more admiringly enthuseastic fans of bubble butts ...... something 'bout them jollies (covered or uncovered) that activates eye dilation and pupil enlargement to levels that would shock.

01-02-13  08:20pm - 4372 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:



May your porn be fresh, and peckers be stiff.
From the Porn that you bought with this year Xmas gift.
To the top of her tits to the fur on her muff, I have had a great year lets download more stuff. I guess as things go
I downloaded my share. I even I think my credit cards maxed now that would be a scare. To finish my thought as I think of tossing one off. Have a great year and may you get your rocks off.

The end by CT !


Wow! I do think we have some latent talent brewing here.
May I request of you, CT, to sprimkle some more of those gems in your future posts from time to time.

01-01-13  03:29pm - 4373 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
A BUTT is a BUTT is a BUTT .....BUT if ones' BUTT tends to BUTT into affairs not of their concern, then I have BUT one thing to say ......BUTT OUT!

01-01-13  12:47am - 4374 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Belated..... I mean, a year has turned over since this thread was created. But here's my take:

Have to vote for both on this one:
I like to see'em start off slow, but pedal-to-the-metal as the action climax.

Meaning, of course, sex done in the conventional way.
You know, like NORMAL INTERCOURSE.
That is to say it shouldn't be interpreted as giving the guy cart blanch to slap her around. Edited on Jan 01, 2013, 11:53am

01-01-13  12:09am - 4374 days #34
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Reveen:


As well as that there is a lot less "porn-face" and mugging to the camera by the actresses which is so irritating in american and european porn.


Ah, my good man, another excellent point about another subject I never tire of lambasting. (the 'ol "i'm in the throes of a powerful orgasmic moment, but I gotta be lookin' at the lens of the camera shooting the scene" )
To wit ....
So I'm watching this dumb-ass chick gettin' her brains (seemingly) fucked out ..... an' meantime, while she lying there moaning' and groaning, her eyes are alternating switching back and forth focused directly at the camera (as if to say: "Hey, lookie ... it's me ... I'm a star")
Nothing like havin' ice water thrown on your groin!
Lets also PLEASE blame the people directing this ......just like the chick, cranial guides jus' ain't at the wheel.

12-31-12  10:26pm - 4374 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
And I find it a special honor and high privilege to be the first poster this year to make an entrance to our superb leader and staff's thread welcoming the year 2013.
I suppose it helps, in part, being an East Coast neighbor.
All the best Chief;
My token prediction is that PU/TBP is just gonna grow and get better and better.
And to my fellow PU friends and esteemed membership, my enthusiasm couldn't be more, nor my wish be greater for 2013 to be your best year ever.

12-28-12  08:05pm - 4377 days #228
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Capn:


IMO what is needed generally, is more eroticism & less of an obsession with gynecology.

I like to see the whole woman more than we get to do.
Clothed, partially clothed & with clear full body nudity.
Not with acrobatic contortionist poses to graphically exhibit intimae, or hands obscuring the view.

Cap'n :0/



If, Capn, I may borrow a delightful signature phrase you often use "spot on" .... then might I extract it herewith to specifically apply to the above selected quote in question ...

Translated: ... meaning I couldn't agree with you more!

12-28-12  03:43am - 4378 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


I always assumed that their whimpering-whining noises were those of ecstasy and not of resistance.


In this regard, let me seize on this opportunity to say unequivocally, and uttered with every fiber of my being ..........
The Jap noises by far sound a helluva lot better than the phony screaming, Oohing, awwwwwwing, and other sundry non-sensible, ear-piercing, earth-tremors coming from many US and European women.

Equally important, despite the rough edges, they're working hard to ultimately match Western film making -- and as I said, the Japanese actors are far more convincing and convey a higher degree of realism and sincerity.
Further, I would argue, this Unique viewing experience will hopefully give back enough to ultimately wake up our fully incompetent selection of studio dumb-asses who're asleep at the wheel and don't know a camera angle from a mound of bovine manure,

BTW, Capn ........ clever thread.

12-26-12  09:00pm - 4379 days #15
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


LOL Very good one, very well written.


Thanks, Cybertoad.
I find your comment especially gratifying coming from one so skillfully versed with the language as you've proven to be.

If you, or others reading this, should like this style of my attempt at humor, then I would strongly appeal to you to trek on back through the forum archives and pick out some of my earlier thread submissions and ferret out similar stories I labored over in an effort to make them entertaining to read.

12-26-12  08:01pm - 4379 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by pat362:


Sorry for derailing the thread. Now back to the subject. I don't know but seeing girls got for full body coloring might make them look like multi-colored Smurfs. I guess if you are into that kind of thing then that's fine but I tend to prefer my girls with the colors God gave them.


a-hem ! (in unison)
I think JBerry said it best in #5, Pat.
So might I expand on this thread as being (in the most obvious sense) like, Hipérbole
Moreover: ..... exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech.

12-26-12  07:40pm - 4379 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Getting back to the thread ... (a-hem) ... having gone where no tattoo thread has gone before ...

The "full-body dip" that Graymane is "promoting" might do fine as a "primer" color, with the "art" to be added later. You know, it's kind of like having a default background color on yer web page.

It would be fun to have a "nude" weather forecaster in the same blue shade as the blue screen. Then we'd only see her eyes, mouth and hair while she gives the forecast.

Well, it's a good thing I'm not drinkin' today, I s'pose.


Some great thoughts, Drooler.
As always, you've exercised the same proclivity here, as elsewhere, that unfailingly adds a uniquic sparkle to our thread's dialogue .
Now, head off to the frig and reward yourself with a couple brews.

12-26-12  01:12am - 4380 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


Hello, tanning salon. Nice to meet you.


Correction, honorable PU good-fellow ....dont'cha mean "hello and "good by?"

I'm talkin' "full body dip" ..... you know, sorta like baptism?
Aftermath leaves only the white of her eyes showing through her beautiful new full body color.
A la Gold-finger, if you will.

Just think of all the attention it'll draw!
Attention is the femme fatale formula we're seeking, is it not?

12-25-12  06:17pm - 4380 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Attention all innovative young ladies.

So'ya say that Tats ain't doin' enough for'ya?
Gettin' pissed because your meager localized tats are being over-looked?
Then come to our grand opening on Market street here in the great party-town of BoPeeps CA.....
Be the first to sport around your new body color.
That's right, Gals .... you heard me right!
Amaze all your friends; Be the envy of all your gender; be among the first to actually get rid of that plain, outdated, boring old skin color that's been around forever ... and step into a vibrant, new you -- transformed into the ultimate femme fatale -- with the ease of only making a selection of the color you wanna be.

Our Procedure is painless, inexpensive, and very simple.
Your nude body is simply lowered into our comfortable, custom made vat of any color ink that appeals to your taste

So..... C'mon gals! What'r'ya waiting for? Tomorrow can be today, so hurry on down.

12-25-12  03:41pm - 4380 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Traditionally Predictable, and welcoming as the purity of a fresh, first winter snow, comes yet another thoughtful greeting from our All-Star Administrator.
Might I join the others acknowledging he and his able staff for their warm and sincere thoughts for this Holiday, as well as the forthcoming introduction of 2013.
You're the best, chief!
That goes as well to our incomparable membership.

12-23-12  12:40am - 4383 days #55
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
It can be argued the Thompson Submachine Gun is every bit as deadly as our modern day assault variety.
So how come kids, teachers, shoppers, college students, and the throngs of other people living in the Prohibition era could be anywhere they wanted to be without harboring a nano-thought of suddenly being blown away by a hail of bullets?
The only victims anywhere associated with this weapon one ever read about were mobsters .... and as riddled as they were from the ammo of these devastating firearms, one didn't hear, therefore never complained about innocent bystanders being killed in the fray.
Firearm policing was never necessary.......
So why wasn't mass killing happening then as they are today?
Is it something in the food chain?????? What?

For those who might be interested in some statistics on the Thomason.... I've copied herewith:





From Wikipedia .....

Thompson Submachine Gun,
Caliber .45M1928A1 wartime production variant.
Type
Submachine gun

Place of origin
United States
Service history
In service
1938–1971 (officially, U.S. military)

Production history:
Designer ....John T. Thompson
Designed: 1917–1920
Produced... 1921–present

Number built1: 700,000 approx.
Specifications:
Weight 10.8 lb (4.9 kg) empty (M1928A1)
10.6 lb (4.8 kg) empty (M1A1)
Length
33.5 in (850 mm) (M1928A1)
32 in (810 mm) (M1/M1A1)
10.5 in (270 mm)
12 in (300 mm) (with cutts compensator)
Cartridge .45 ACP (11.43 × 23 mm)
Action: Blowback, Blish Lock
Rate of fire: 600–1500+ rpm, depending upon model Feed system ....
20-round stick/box magazine
30-round stick/box magazine
50-round drum magazine
100-round drum magazine
(M1 and M1A1 models do not accept drum magazines)


The Thompson is an American submachine gun, invented by John T. Thompson in 1919, that became infamous during the Prohibition era. It was a common sight in the media of the time, being used by both law enforcement officers and criminals.[6] The Thompson was also known informally as: the "Tommy Gun", "Trench Broom", "Trench Sweeper", "Chicago Typewriter", "Chicago Piano", "Chicago Style", "Chicago Organ Grinder", and "The Chopper".[7][8][9][10]

The Thompson was favored by soldiers, criminals, police and civilians alike for its ergonomics, compactness, large .45 ACP cartridge, reliability, and high volume of automatic fire. It has since gained popularity among civilian collectors for its historical significance.

12-21-12  12:13am - 4385 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Reveen:


Well DBAN (Darik's boot and nuke) http://www.dban.org/ will thoroughly clean a hard disk but its not something that you would do lightly. It erases all data on a hard disk and overwrites it, once thats done you reinstall windows. Be warned it can take ages, the one time I've personally used it it took about 10 hours iirc.


Many thanks, Reveen, for bringing up this important and timly piece of information..... I'll likely forward this to my computer friend who's been servicing this computer, as well as previous ones I've owned.
As with all computer savvy and technically gifted guys, however, working his day job and answering the call of selected others slices his time into far too many pieces.
He's good, though, so I hang in there and wrestle with the others for those pieces.
The problem's now compounded , unfortunately, because of my recently having to move outside the limits of his traveling distance, I'm afraid my only future option for his help will have to be done remotely.

12-19-12  10:13pm - 4386 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Hooliganzo:


The only guaranteed way to get rid of malware is to do a clean reinstall of windows. Copy any files you want to save to another hard drive and then do a fresh install of windows or whatever OS you are installing. This will erase everything on the hard drive you are installing windows in.

After installing the OS get an Anti virus, I use ESET but you can always download Microsoft security essentials which is free for anybody who owns windows. Make sure it is from Microsoft.com and not any other site so you don't download a fake Anti virus. Then scan the hard drive you backed your files in and delete any .exe files.

If you don't want to be infected again, never install anything that that does not come from a well known legitimate site.

Turn off Java or use Noscript plugin when visiting new sites.

Once you get infected there is no way to make sure you got rid of everything. Most malware are designed to stay hidden and disable popular anti virus software. You have to assume that your computer is compromised and anything on it like passwords can be taken. After reinstalling change any passwords you may have used.


Thank you very, very much, Holliganzo, for that sound advice.
However, Being the novice that I am, my suspicions actually has also been along the same lines of what you've so thoughtfully posted here... its just that unless somebody who's trustworthy, and really knows what he's doing, personally gets a handle on my problems and do whatever necessary to get rid of these vermin-intruders once and for all. I've had my Operating system restored and stripped clean more than once, only to have the intruders re-appear.
Unfortunately, seemingly most PC attackers are smart, an' i'm further convinced they simply set-up-housekeeping once they get a foothold in the right places .....and at sometime during this invasion overrun your virus program and take command, thereafter easily getting a free ride anywhere they wanna go.

12-18-12  04:56pm - 4387 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by picdude:


Been hit twice, first time my gf, no antivirus etc on her pc...real pain to fix but fixed it...brought norton... 6 months later my pc locked out...couldn't find a way of fixing it (great job norton) so brought a new harddrive (know I could of wiped it but one day ill try and get my files back)


I hear you loud and clear.
My PC currently is in the same troubled waters.
No lock-ups, or freezing of the sort, but just all kind of unfamiliar stuff going on that just ain't right.
My big concern is having to do with my administrative powers seemingly stolen. I base that on evidence I perceive having to do with "users," and sharing.
I can't get rid of the devils because I'm denyed permission" ....Can you believe that? I bought and paid for this PC yet, and God only knows how many other trespassers are using it. All of which I suspect is the result of a disturbing number of folders I had in storage that I'm now finding are now mysteriously empty.

12-17-12  05:38pm - 4388 days #11
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Scary, denner.
This tat-fad, too, will pass....and I believe it'll creep up on us sooner than later.
Tats are ugly. They're forever.
Rational popularity rage has gotta beg of it being only a question of time before its appeal fades, thus riding off into the sunset. (hopeful destination being a permanent burial ground for similar wayward crazes)

Meanwhile ....
Imagine the wake-up call the legions of pretty girls who've gone overboard in body ink will get when the picture turns on them?
I think "anathema" fits the equation rather well.

12-17-12  04:10pm - 4388 days #29
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
If we're to come anywhere near successfully enforcing laws to forbid firearm ownership, then first and foremost we must give our lawmen the ultimate power to have a free hand to do whatever necessary to advance in reaching that end.
As it stands, normally before police can rightly carry out a search of a suspected home possessing contraband, they have to have a court order giving permission.
If the process is too slow, or any other reason evidence is removed prior to a search, or never existed, then the so-called victims of this violation of privacy is given all the legal ammo they need to respond with punitive action. That kind of thing (however) likely won't jell or come to fruition, but the unwanted repercussion to the department and the city ends up being a big, painful black eye. Damn, man ... is this lunacy or what?

Do you Notice China don't have the kind of crimes we in the US are having. Why? Because those guilty of such are caught and punished in a manner that leaves them wishing -- no, begging -- they had never broke the law in the first place.

As much as I detested Saddam Hussein and his choice of punishment to those who stepped out of line, the fact laws were rarely ever broken in Iraq speaks volumes for being tough on offenders.

I know all these examples I mentioned are over the top, and one certainly may recoil from the very thought of even considering those actions being viable.
But babe, we just can't continue to bury our heads in the sand when it comes to better protecting our own ...namely loosening the bounds of those with power exerting authority and making those ignoring our laws, and especially those who would harm our innocents, suffer consequences to fit the crime.

I'm reminded of a popular line in a movie:
"I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore"

12-17-12  01:12am - 4389 days #22
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Please review our Bill of Rights. It was constructed by extremely intelligent men with a lot of foresight. The amendments are in a very specific order based on importance and the amendments also ordered so that one is meant to protect the one above it.

The system works very well, but as with any system there are a few people out of millions that can not be trusted with it. The latest event were by that of a vermin who was willing to kill his own mother. Laws and reform do not protect against a POS that would do that. My guns have never been pointed at a person and they never will be, barring an extreme self defense situation. The woman who legally purchased the guns in this event did so under the strictest laws in the country and used them only for target shooting. The shooter would not have been able to legally purchase the guns he used.

Hard-earnedAs people allow their rights to be eroded there is nothing that can stop them all from being taken. The second amendment is there to protect our most important rights.

Events like this infuriate those of us who own guns for the right reasons.


Very well written, badandy ......you have laid down an excellent point, as well as a fair assessment of our Bill of Rights content having to do with the recent tragic gunning down of so many innocent women and children.

I don't own a gun, I hate the harm they bring, and I share in the wishes of those who favor any kind of action that'll KEEP them out of the hands of maniacs of the ilk who created this recent massacre in Connecticut.
But that's only wishful thinking, and patently impossible.
Dispite laws forbiding the ownership of firearms, the wrong people who want them will always find a way to possess a gun; and the innocent, law-abiding who lawfully adhere to those laws are open season for those of a criminal mind who don't.

Years ago, I thwarted a possible forceful entry late one night by convincing a couple strangers turning the knob of my front door that I was holding a shotgun loaded with buckshot, and I warned the first leg that gained entrance would have the body its attached to blown into bits and pieces. They believed me and hauled ass.
But I lied.
I shudder to think of the consequences had they been armed and chanced forcing their way in.
I called the police when this was going down,
but by the time that elapsed before they arrived .... well, had the latter occurred, you might not be reading this post.

12-16-12  03:16pm - 4389 days #15
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
It's a sad commentary and expensive state to be pushed into, but, following a practice being used to protect infinitely less precious among us than our children, namely implementing an armed guard and silent alarm systems at each of our schools, for starters might be the alternative to consider as a deterrent.

12-15-12  12:01am - 4391 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Still shook to the core, In the wake of this horrific event on our soil ...... I'm compelled to say that today is not one I can proclaim to be a proud American.

Piss-poor Parental discipline and guidance, stemming in part from spiraling birth-rates, apathy, laziness, run-away idle time and, sadly, compounded by hand-bounded laws, has sank the level of growing kid's behavior to such an all-time-low in this country that these kind of tragedies will just keep coming 'round the corner.

Another fly in the ointment is the explosive attention it draws to the perpetrators of these acts ..... negative that it is, it's one of the potent G-spots for potential teens who might harbor this kind of latent thrill.

Notice these things tend to follow one anothrr.

12-12-12  03:57pm - 4393 days #29
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


I would judge by your reply, graymane, that you had quite a few casual dalliances .. see "respectable number of women!" In their case I too would be very careful about sounding derogatory or demeaning.
I am talking about long established LOVING relationships where the partners like to play bedroom games. Some of those games may seem bizarre to others but are highly stimulating and satisfactory to the partners.


I, too, am horrified when a woman is casually called a whore or slut or bitch. This is exactly what motivated me to make this post. There is a certain dignity to every human life and that dignity should not be casually violated. However in the bedroom everything goes if "playing mutually satisfactory games" enhances a couples sex life. At least that has always been my view.


Somehow, (before my once nimble fingers, which now have given way to crippling arthritis) was approaching the keys
to form the (ill-choosin) adjective "respectable" I knew the selection would come back to haunt me -- as indeed it did.
I used the definition associated closer to "an appreciative number" rather than one's demeanor (or)behavior in the foregoing context -- a decision which seemingly invited feeding time for our worthy, sharp, keen-eyed grammerical observers.

Unsurprisingly, messmer's welcomed and perceptive reply has certainly gave me much to think about.

12-12-12  12:01am - 4394 days #27
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Ummmm, lemme think how I can put this?
Gimme just a moment! ....
OK...
I've met a respectable number of women, from a lotta different places, even some Aussie beauties who globally dwell literally on the very bottom of where I'm now standing; heard a lotta talk, and I, likewise, done a lotta talking ...and, from my own experiences, using every ploy at my disposal in an effort to succeed at seduction .... and, I might add, the few who did acquiesce, I can say without equivocation, not one....nay not one, who wouldn't go up side my head if I called them a whore, slut, pig, or any other names synonymous with the ones mentioned in this thread .... whether before, during, or after engaging in a sexual activity.

Nor would I expect otherwise.

12-07-12  09:29pm - 4398 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


This is how I feel when moving in the wonderful world of Porno. I love porn, I buy porn, I collect porn ... yet the only place in this raw and uncensored world where I don't feel unclean is right here.

I have never met a more civilized, courteous bunch of people than in Porn Users .. and it's not the first time I say this .. I love your company, consider many of you to be "friends" in the detached, on-line sense, yet the moment I go to a site (other than softcore) I find myself in the company of foul-mouthed snooks that make me cringe, especially when in reference to the "actresses."

women in enticing lingerie ... you knew that would come, didn't you?


I gotta tell'ya, messmer..... this is the most moving message I've ever had the privilege of reading in an on line forum. The truth and power of your thoughts bought tears to these aged eyes .... and I suspect to a respectable number of others, too.
It is responsibly outspoken, sincere and morally presented arguments like yours, and the too few like minded others who collectively give what little semblance of a struggling dignity the porn industry needs to keep it from sliding into their own ultimate demise.
If my history is right.... the great Rome empire fell partly from too much complacency.

I salute those few and all they stand for in our efforts to continue the fight for a survivable level of values in an industry muddled in aimless tunnel vision.

12-07-12  05:16pm - 4398 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Some real eyeopening stuff, JB.
An I gotta add that the timing and absolute flawless ease of comprehension to which you put this together boosted the whole message beyond it's intent.
Good job.

While I haven't experienced exactly the aforementioned, I'd like to throw out there some equally crazy stuff going on with my computer:

Since files are mysteriously disappearing from folders in my collective archives, and I'm unable to access so much stuff anymore because I'm told I "have to get permission" (Damed! permission from who?)
This, as well as a myriad of other similar stuff going on, has left me with being convinced my administrative rights have been high jacked. (ring-a-bell anybody?)

12-07-12  04:18pm - 4398 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
A very well deserved recognition, marcdc. Congrats!

I will add, and I trust also our fellow members on this great site would share in this proclamation:
"Your achievements, hard work, dedication, as well as all the other positive factors that enter into this salutation .....do us proud."

12-04-12  12:27am - 4402 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by skunk:


sexxximps.com is new.

graymane
your not just beat a dead horse trying to get these dumb-asses to listen. well not this one if i can do the changes i do.
that is why i set the site up to sell just 1 film.
so i wish you to wish more lol


Well, Skunk, let me commend you for getting off to a good start ..... namely coming on board with us here and giving us a perspective (and I hope a continuing one) from a webmaster's point of view.
Our people value webmasters input more than you'll know, and if you're honest with us, especially upon showing a genuine interest like you've done on this thread, then I cannot but logically predict nothing but a rewardingly positive result to follow.

12-03-12  09:03pm - 4402 days #26
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
As you already know, comrade messmer, I'm one of your enthusiastic cheerleaders, and my pom-poms are-a-waving an' I'm doin' back-flips down the sidelines in support of this one. (thread)

Sigh! Same-ol'-same-ol' .....Seems we're Always fighting' a never-ending battle with these close-minded gold diggers ... although we who chant for mere improvements are many, the studios remain entrenched with the power of holding what we want, exercising greed, caring not and letting our cries relentlessly fall on deaf ears.
But ....
Hang in there, warrior .... "the word is mightier than the sword." ummm, eh, whomever authored the latter, I must hasten to add: ..... Whether you can attach said quote to anything having to do with this dilemma is any body's guess ....... jus' popped in to my mind, though, an' wouldn't let go.

BTW.... allow me, if you will, to seize on the moment here to reiterate an ongoing rant of mine that continues to aggravate another festering sore brought on by apparent airheads who run some of these sites and who're imposing some of this worthless crap onto their members:
Namely ..... arbitrarily incorporating still photo shoots in video clips we aren't paying for, or wish to see.
Example: ... I click on a particularly tempting solo scene expecting to see this delectable babe give me some moves that'll wake up my arthritic libido, only to be deflated by seeing just flashbulbs poppin' all over the place and my "babe" posing completely motionless sporting a big smile as she exchanges quips with the cameramen and crew.

12-03-12  06:48pm - 4402 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
What do I wish? All of the above and seizable more.
So much more, in fact, that I'd likely exceed the character allowance for posting replies.
I will, however, give it more deserving thoughts and see if I can condense all my like-minded grips that line up with your welcomed ideas and get back to you.
But sadly, my friend, I think we're just continuing to beat a dead horse trying to get these dumb-asses to listen

12-01-12  08:43am - 4405 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
This story reminds me of a similar one that broke here where I live, about 40 or more years ago concerning some of our major local hospitals.
It got out that nurses, and other hospital workers, as well as doctors, were stealing narcotic medication from the vaults and replacing them with placebos.
Many were stealing them for their personal use while others to sell to eager buyers on the outside.

When the roof finally did blow off this affair and the media was wildly swarming about while the citizenry was stewing, a strange thing happened:
Within days the media coverage stopped and things were ebbing back to normal. Then it just all went away.
I suppose I was in the majority of those who were rife with outrage that such a thing would happen.
All I could think about was those hospital patients who were in pain and getting nothing stronger than aspirins.

How long this went on before the discovery and the Axe fell on this thing, is any body's guess. But as I recall, after the authorities did some house cleaning no heads rolled nor any arrests were made from this whole sordid mess.

I suspect the timely hush of news that was held in check might have something to do with The AMA putting a foot up the health care locale's ass, and at the same time using the other foot to block any more harm to their reputation. Edited on Dec 02, 2012, 09:56am

11-23-12  04:43pm - 4412 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


^I'll go along with you ... partially, graymane. We watched a movie from the fifties the other day and both my wife and I burst out: My God, women looked so pretty in their dresses back then! But I vehemently disagree when it comes to the "cotton panties." In our day it was nylon, perlon, rayon, silk, satin, rather than cotton. I see nothing exciting about cotton or another later invention, pantyhose! Hope we'll remain friends!


LOL ..... (you'll rarely see me using this abbreviation cuz the written word has long passed that would elicit that level of outburst) however, Congrats. you're a winner.

Pantyhose and nylon turn me off like a toothless warthog.
An' yes, we're still friends. Jus' a matter to agree to disagree.
Cotton panties dug so deep in my consciousness as a hot-blooded kid growing up that its ingrained to taking precedence over all else. Ya gotta understand that was IT in underwear, and as close as we got to see what covers that forbidden moist terrain that I craved so desperately to get my teeth into (literally)
Alas, I may as well wish to find the end of a rainbow.

551-600 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 11 Page 12 13 16 19 22 28 29 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.