Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

2401-2450 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 48 Page 49 50 51 52 Next Page >

10-23-08  08:04pm - 5904 days #35
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Wow - how far east are you in Canada? I checked the distance from St. John's in Newfoundland to both Z&#65533;rich, Switzerland and Boulder Colorado and even that far east Boulder came in the winner at 2632 miles (4235km) - Z&#65533;rich was 2805 miles (4514km). Granted that's pretty damn close to the same and given the choice I pick Switzerland myself, lol

Wait, you aren't in Grise Fiord, Nunavut, are you? That would be bloody far away!


I just made a toadsith "oops" by reading this post last. I stand corrected when it comes to the distances. :-)

10-23-08  08:02pm - 5904 days #34
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Whoops - I guess you already answered my previous question :-)

I'd say the Rockies are closer to you (unless you insist on staying in Canada, lol) but I gotta say I'd choose the Alps every time - much more interesting and lots of great driving roads to boot! Though apparently Switzerland itself is very strange about driving, Italy (if you are in an Italian supercar) and Germany I hear are the best places in Western Europe for driving. Then again, most people don't rent a car when they visit Europe, so this probably isn't of much interest.


I always assumed that Europe was closer to where I live than the Rockies, but maybe not! We loved the Alps ourselves and the superhighways in Switzerland, Austria, Germany were excellent. I rented a car each time we visited and enjoyed the German Autobahn especially since they had no speed limits at the time. Mind you the local drivers could be a bit rude with anyone who showed any hesitation because he didn't know his way around and got in their way! I don't know about Switzerland's strangeness when it comes to driving except that they made you pay a fee at their border if you wanted to use their highways. My absolutely favorite spot on this planet is a Swiss area called the "Berner Oberland" (we called it Heidi country).

10-23-08  07:51pm - 5904 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I have to agree that Eastern Canada to Calgary is a very long trip, and probably quite expensive to fly there. I sometimes forget just how big Canada is. We want to drive across Confederation bridge next summer. It's kind of embarassing to say that I've nver been to PEI or NB. I've met people from there and the general consensus has always been that they are the nicest people you will ever meet.


Not to forget Nova Scotia! :-) The Navy brought me here but the people made me stay!

10-23-08  03:18pm - 5904 days #25
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I can't speak from experience because I've never been to Europe but you have to admit that Lake Louise is in one word: BREATHTAKING. It may not compare to the ASlps, but then again the Cdn$ isn't fairing well againt the Euro either.


Hi pat362, that's why I was mentioning "the mountains!" I did have Banff, Lake Louise etc. in mind when I wrote that. Trouble is I live in the Maritimes and except for Quebec City, Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg what is there between here and there that would make for an interesting trip?

And when it comes to flying directly to Alberta, Europe is actually closer to us and is a clear winner with my wife. She can't see where mountains are any good if they don't have a cluster of charming chalets and medieval towns at their feet. :-)

10-23-08  03:08pm - 5904 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Monahan:


A trip from Jaspar to Banff on the Iceland Parkway is fantastic. If you liked the Alps, Swiss, Italian and/or French, you'll love the Canadian Rockies.


I'm sure I would love the Rockies but seeing that I live about as far away from them as you could get, visiting there has always been a dream and nothing more. Switzerland is actually closer and is my wife's dream destination so .... ! :-)

10-23-08  02:16pm - 5904 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Been, there done that, yawned as I was there.
I am sure Cananda is ok for Canadians LOL.
But I hold my self to a higher standards LOL.

Send hate Mail to hehehe.

Actually went during winter and it was awsome, but many places are few and far between. Ever fly in a 15 passnger
dual prop plane flying over Lake Ontario that takes 4 hours and you get the idea of what slow is LOL.

Not even sure how my post fit in. Randomness.


No hate mail coming from this quarter, Cybertoad. We're too laid back for that! But you described it perfectly with many places indeed being too few and far between. That's always been my problem. Take a trip to Europe and there is some romantic town (and good food) around every corner. Travel in Canada and there are hours where you don't see a house. The size of this place is overwhelming. I love it because of the proverbial politeness of the average Canadian but if you have to drive two days to see something different .. naw .. I'd just as soon stay home and look at porn!

10-23-08  11:50am - 5905 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


w00t - now I have even more incentive to visit Montreal some more!

Oh and um, that would be bad for your vacations I suppose, but who wants to visit the US anyway? Why not go to the Caribbean or something? :-D


Tell the truth, I have no great desire to take a vacation in Canada either, there's too many miles of bush and wheat to traverse in order to get where I really long to be: The Mountains! And my SO doesn't particularly care for those either because she's seen the Alps, together with romantic Swiss chalets and quaint medieval towns and, in her mind, nothing will ever beat that!

10-23-08  11:42am - 5905 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


You guys had to talk about the dollar going down. Well thank You, now it's below 80 cents US. Actually it's great news for Canadians Businesses. The high value of our dollar doesn't help our trade, nor does it help to get Americans to come up to Canada for vacations or for studios to choose Canada to film their movies.

It does suck for anyone wanting to go on vacation in the US or to buy anything in US dollars.


I know it's great for business etc. but what about my porn sites! <wail>

10-23-08  11:27am - 5905 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Trying to keep the subject alive for another day:

Okay, guys, here are the facts as I see them: ninety percent of you most likely find the subject of older women boring, while another five percent might find it mildly interesting. But I belong to a very small minority that really has no great interest in women that are younger than my age. I truly believe that a beautiful woman is like a fine wine, she improves with age.

I've tried many other sites (see reviews) but they leave me cold very quickly, so .. has ANYONE EVER COME ACROSS A SOLO PICTURE SITE THAT PRIMARILY CONTAINED WOMEN OVER FIFTY?

Let me repeat! Please! (Desperation written all over face):

Even if it isn't your area of interest have you ever, in your Internet travels, come across any sites out there that are reputable (not some cheap, secondary, neglected MILF site in a network) that would fit the bill?

Messmer, still looking and not getting anywhere!! Thank you, brothers!

10-22-08  06:10pm - 5905 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


What? You guys just had an election and now your currency is tanking against the all impotent dollar? That's what you get for electing conservatives :) Don't worry, I'm sure everyone's exchange rate is probably going to get beat up in the midst of all this mess.


Yes, you're right, other currencies are suffering as well as prudent investors turn to the one safe bet in uncertain times: the U.S. Dollar. Seems a bit ironic since most of the mess was caused by Wall Street. :-) Ah, well, what goes down must come back up .. I'll just have to exercise some patience and keep my eyes open for specials. And I'll have you know that I didn't vote Conservative so don't anyone in Canada blame me for the dollar's dive! :-)

10-22-08  02:32pm - 5905 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I can only say that I've paid more than $30 for a site once (that was a network) and I wasn't overly impressed with the value. Like Colm4 notes, I don't see any sites over $30 that seem like "musts" for me.

Currently, I'm scouting out the TBP full trials and discounted sites. I'm guessing that as the economy continues to tank more sites are going to be offering discounts and trials in order to keep revenues up. Warren Buffet says the time to buy stock is when everyone else is panicking. My guess is that in the next few months we're going to see more deals so it might not be too bad of time to be downloading.



I am certainly looking forward to some discounted sites and soon, please, because my dollar just lost a quarter of its value during the past couple of months when measured against the US Dollar. The average site has now become too expensive for the average Canadian. I just got finished canceling all my sites to make sure none of them will renew by mistake.

10-21-08  02:24pm - 5906 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Toadsith, very eloquently reasoned and I am forced to agree with most of what you wrote even though I originally thought that, with the enthusiasm of youth, you threw the baby out with the bath water. See your: "I deny tolerance. Acceptance or nothing at all. Tolerance speaks of a group of people needing the approval of another." :-) The statement seemed too absolute to me .. but reading carefully your second post I am starting to understand what you meant. Communication isn't always easy, is it?

10-21-08  09:46am - 5907 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


I deny tolerance. Acceptance or nothing at all. Tolerance speaks of a group of people needing the approval of another. You never tolerate equals. I admit I do tolerate some things. Like deer and pigeons - I'm not willing to expend the energy necessary to exterminate them from my areas of frequent travel, so I tolerate them. "We tolerate you" simply states that we hate you but can't get rid of you within our current constraints.


HaHa, a strong statement uttered with the conviction of the young. Tolerance also means recognizing that there are differences in tastes, customs, cultures, morals etc., acknowledging that fact and learning to live with it rather than start wars in a forum, the neighborhood, country or abroad. Not very elegantly put but you know what I mean! :-)

10-21-08  07:53am - 5907 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


check out Seduced by a Cougar subsite included in the Naughty America family of sites. Video and pics...excellent quality!


Thanks shooterbo, I will. With a bit of luck it won't be one of those MILF (cougar) sites where they might have older models but for some perverse reason hire all the ones who look young for their age, defeating the purpose of a mature site.

It's the young looking ones I want to get away from. I feel like a pedophile every time I look at a model that is almost a third my age. I'm no more interested in her as she would be in me, unless I had money like Croesus or were one of the Rolling Stones! :-)

P.S. Added five minutes later: just came back from the site and the first trailer I watched had a woman in her forties seduce the grocery boy. See my remarks to mr.3633. Just for once I'd like to see the man trying to seduce the woman!

There are beautiful and desirable fifty years olds (and over)! Probably not to someone in their twenties but some of us are old enough to appreciate maturity. Edited on Oct 21, 2008, 08:16am

10-21-08  07:45am - 5907 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by mr3633:


Thanks for posting this Messmer. I have run into some of the same issues you have when looking for a good quality mature site. I am hopeful someone will respond back with some feedback. I would say I am more interested in the videos than pictures though.


I am not averse to videos of mature women, mr.3633, what bothers me with most of them is that they portray the women as being desperate for sex .. as if life stopped at forty and they just sit there waiting for that well-muscled stud to make them feel younger again! In most of the videos at Videobox the cougars practically tear the clothes off anyone who strays within their desperate sphere! See above!

10-20-08  07:22pm - 5907 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


I've probably mentioned this before but are there any picture sites out there with models that are primarily 40+?
Preferably 50+?

I subscribed to "AllOver30" recently and was disappointed, because they had such a small number of truly mature ladies.

"Older Women" and "Aunt Judy's" are disappointments for the same reason. Today I downloaded the sets of the four or five token mature models they feature, now what am I going to do for the rest of the month? After all, I just subscribed to both sites! :-)

"Lusty Grandmas" came close but the site was hard core and featured mostly older women who were so desperate for some young meat that they'd practically attack anyone under forty if he happened to be in the neighborhood! <sigh>

In desperation I took a tour of "Karup's Older Women" a few minutes ago and gave up on page 7 of their models' list. Good heavens, not an "older woman" to be found among the bunch of them.

I realize that "older" is subjective but who except someone in his teens would ever think of a thirty year old as a Cougar or older woman?

So, here once again is my desperate plea: has anyone come across reputable sites that might not be listed in TBP or PU that really cater to "mature" tastes? The models don't even have to be beautiful just .... older!!

Thank you and apologies for being so lugubrious! :-)

10-20-08  06:29pm - 5907 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I think many wear the cross because it is one of the most common fashion accessories found in the Western World. In this secular age I doubt if it has a deeper meaning for most.

For some it could be a symbol that God loves them just as they are and I don't find that hard to believe since, in my mind and conscience, violence in general and unjustified wars in particular are far greater sins than porn. Might be self-justification on my part but I don't think so.

For some it might exhibit their love for God. They have somehow managed to reconcile what they are doing with their God and his laws.

10-18-08  07:46am - 5910 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


Just wondering what the rest of you folks think about pregnant women. Is it sexy, or is it the opposite?

I'm not asking, is a pregnant woman sexy just by virtue of being pregnant. What I mean is, take a woman you already find sexy. Would she be sexier to you if she became pregnant, or would this be a problem for you sexually?

Or would it make no difference?


I could never see the aversion to pictures or videos of pregnant women. I think a sexy woman is even sexier when she is pregnant.

I believe that, here again, we have a generational divide when it comes to taste. I noticed that those who are thirty or under have a different standard of perfection than those of us over forty, to draw a somewhat arbitrary line.

The younger (generalizing) appear to prefer slim, shaved, big breasted, while the older, to use the term loosely, prefer (generalizing again) natural and even find small imperfections (saggy breasts etc.) appealing. The made-up doll look, for them, is not desirable and pregnancy would be an appealing interim look of a normal, healthy woman rather than something that turns off the viewer.

My comments are always written with the knowledge that there are exceptions to every rule.

10-16-08  12:36pm - 5912 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


If you right click on the video while it is playing, a menu should pull up and then you can mouse over "Video" and there should be a second menu with "Aspect Ratio" listed - then just select which ever aspect ratio you'd prefer :-)

(I'm typing this from memory, let me know if it seems wrong and I'll check the program directly, lol)


Ah, Toadsith, whatever would I do without you gentlemen and this forum. Your advice worked like a charm. I looked in all the settings and could never find the aspect ratio. A right click, who would have thought! :-) Thanks.

10-15-08  06:13pm - 5912 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
An additional question. For some reason some of my widescreen videos from FTV play in the 4:3 format rather than 16:9. They are definitely HD and definitely widescreen and play that way in wmp. Where is the setting so that this new player will play a video as recorded? Or did I click the wrong button somewhere? :-)

10-14-08  06:11pm - 5913 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I've asked CCBill for refunds before, and got nothing but the runaround. Once it was with a site that misrepresented its content (volume and pic sizes). No one could even find that fucking webmaster. I'm still PO'd about it.

So Messmer, I don't know how you enunciated the "abara kadabara," but you got the door to creak open.


I ran into a site like that last year but CCBill wasn't their agent. It was one of those tempting "cheapo" sites, (don't ever let temptation carry you away because you get exactly what you pay for). $10.00 for one month, not renewable. Halfway down the welcome was a link to "my husband's site," I clicked on it, took in what he had (not much) and then found out at the bottom of the home page that by clicking on that link I had obligated myself to a continuing subscription to his site for $ 24.99 a month.

Most of the links on her site didn't work and kept leading you to the sign-up form. The contents I could get at was inferior and could be downloaded within fifteen minutes. No link to support, no link for comments, no link to webmaster, no link to the CCBill equivalent, a company I had never heard of. It took detective work and some luck before I finally got my money back. The email address to the CCBill equivalent was hidden inside the entrance icon and could only be seen if you right-clicked on it. If I hadn't found it by accident I'd be sitting with a new credit card right now. :-) So, buyer beware.

After a long, wordy detour: the site that gave me my money back this time appeared to be legit, however limited it may have been.

I thought I'd give a true amateur site a shot for a change and was sorely disappointed with their set-up. Their main section was free but had very few good pictures or videos, so I figured by subscribing to the "pay" part which contained more hard core amateur material I'd have myself a complete amateur site.

The pay part of the site contained only one month's material, the pictures were still small and blurry with most faces masked, still of inferior quality (true of most amateur sites)and the videos were every bit as bad. Now comes the part that really made me feel I had been cheated.

After resting for that month or two in the Pay Partition called "The Vaultz" the material was then shifted to an archive that again required a separate subscription.

So if you found a decent looking model you liked in the free section you had to subscribe to two different sections of the site to follow her progress over the months or years.

The Price was right but the quality and methods used were not and I let the webmaster know that I thought of their methods as deceptive and misleading and felt I had been scammed. Maybe it was the latter statement that gave me a quick refund because I hear that if there are too many complaints about iffy sites CCBill and Epoch will drop them like hot potatoes. Whew, that was a long-winded one! :-)

PS. Looking at my original post .. I lied! It's not the first time I asked for a refund but the second time! I had forgotten all about the one I mentioned above to Drooler. For a good excuse see ... messmer ... profile ... age! :-) Edited on Oct 14, 2008, 06:34pm

10-14-08  05:33pm - 5913 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


Brazzers told me 10 to 15 days, and the credit hit 2 days later, but it was not the total amount as they promised.


Thanks for the heads up, shooterbo. Must keep my eye on the balance.

10-14-08  02:49pm - 5913 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


I think that is general ass-covering. In all likelihood you'll see that credit very quickly, but certain circumstances could slow things down - like holidays, for instance. Companies often like to warn about worst case scenarios in this sort of thing to try to stop customers from contacting them and accusing them of bad business practices just because a transaction is taking a little longer than expected (and probably in a manner that is outside their control). I doubt it will take more than 4 business days for the credit to show up.


I think you hit the nail right on the head, toadsith. Seeing that I trust CCBill I think I'll just sit back and wait to see how long it will take to get my refund.

10-14-08  02:46pm - 5913 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Normal to get a refund from a porn site:
1. wow the fact the responded quick enough to give a refund is awsome.
2. The fact the gave you a refund is awsome.
3. see one and two.

Seriously it can take a day or two to see your credit card credited, electronically. But 4 weeks unless they have some weird twisted billing system 4 weeks sounds odd.
I would research CCbills Terms they are reputatble so its got to be a policy somewhere.


It was awesome and totally unexpected to get a refund without protest, that's for sure. Maybe it was because I dropped a few words like deception and cheating and scam when I asked for my money back! :-) In any case, three cheers for the webmaster, she didn't even get angry and offered no resistance!

10-14-08  10:32am - 5914 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


Subscribed to a crappy site yesterday and realized it within half an hour. I wrote to the webmaster who, to her credit, canceled my account immediately and without protest.

I also got in touch with CCBill who told me that my account would be credited with a full refund ... hooray! But one thing has me curious, they also added that it may take 2 - 4 weeks (depending on the bank) before the credit shows up in my account. This is the first time I've ever asked for a refund so I don't know if this is an excessive length of time to have to wait. I will let things take their slow course but am wondering if this is normal?

10-14-08  07:20am - 5914 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by elonlybuster:


I have yet to see a video type that VLC can't handle, and this included "broken" videos.

It's too bad they made a lot of mistakes on the newer version. A lot of people are refusing to upgrade because of it. Regardless it's free and it works insanely well. If I were to review it I'd give it a 98%


What mistakes did they make, elonlybuster? I am new to this viewer and am curious!

10-14-08  07:19am - 5914 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


Tried another vid, now it shows the X button. Hmmm.

Also found snaps in MyPictures folder.


You can decide which folder to use for the snapshots, www. Just click on tools, then preferences, then videos and you will find the choice near the bottom of the screen that pops up. It also gives you the option to save the snapshops in jpg rather than png.

10-13-08  06:57pm - 5914 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Since my home computer runs XP instead of (evil) Vista, I thought despite it being WMP 11, that it might still be different. So I found this page on File Associations in Vista, perhaps this will be of assistance :-)

Ask Leo!: Where did file associations go in Vista?


Thank you, Toadsith! Thank you, Leo!

10-13-08  06:48pm - 5914 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Cartoon effect

If you are using version 0.9.2 or later (go to Help>About... to see the version you have), go to Tools>Extended Settings>Video Effects>Image modification



Found it, thanks Monahan! As to disabling WMP default file associations, see my reply to toadsith.

And I know what you mean by hanging on to WMP because you never know what might happen if you try to get rid of realplayer, quicktime and wmp because some web sites demand them and won't accept any substitutes.

I thought I didn't need Quicktime any more, uninstalled it, and within an hour found a site that wouldn't let me stream a quicktime movie if I didn't have QT on my hard drive. So, it's back on! :-)

10-13-08  06:31pm - 5914 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Traditionally with Windows Media Player, you need to find the File menu (if it is hidden) and then, under "Tools", select "Options...". That will open the Options window which is tabulated, and one of the Tabs should say "File Types" (or perhaps "Associations"). The current computer I'm running is using Media Player 10, if this doesn't work, let me know and I'll check out how to do it on Media Player 11 on my other computer later. However, I'm pretty sure it is basically the same with all recent versions of the program.


Thanks for the offer of help, Toadsith. I am using WMP 11 for Vista and under tools > option> there's nothing to be found that would point to file associations unless it is very well hidden. If you ever find a way on your other computer to un-couple me from WMP I will be deeply grateful. :-)

10-13-08  12:41pm - 5915 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks Monahan, I got the player and love it! One problem though, I associated all formats with my new player but Windows Media Player is hesitant in giving up .mpg and wmv. files. Where on the WMP do I find "associations" so that I can uncheck the two formats. I looked high and low but can't find them. By the way, I realize that I can play the files with the new player by right-clicking and then choosing it but don't want to go through the constant bother. I also saw some replies referring to watching a movie in cartoon effect. How do I do that? Sounds interesting! :-)

10-13-08  07:53am - 5915 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


I'd say try to keep it less than 15% of the screen. It should be monochrome and translucent (opacity should be 25%). While most porn producers do like the bottom right, the proper position is bottom left. This is because, humans taught to read standard left to right, top to bottom style writing scan images the same way. That is they look first at center of the top third of the image, then they look at the top left corner and scan down to the bottom right corner. So the bottom left corner is the easiest place to ignore something. To this effect, you'll notice most of the broadcasting companies put their watermark in this position.

I captured a frame from an episode of the FOX Television show "Fringe" and mapped it out a bit.

FOX Watermark on "Fringe"


Hey toadsith, my personal view is that 15% would still be too large and I prefer my logos on the bottom right because that's the last place I look at. I hardly notice them there ... as long as they are not 15% of the picture then you can't help but notice. I totally agree when it comes to monochrome and translucent.

And talking about TV, most Canadian broadcasters have their logos on the bottom right and translucent. Edited on Oct 13, 2008, 07:58am

10-12-08  08:23am - 5916 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Has anybody seen how Sylvia Saint has matured with grace and beauty...(stupid question, maybe)
She does not do hc anymore (alas) - but I'll really like to see her trying out lingerie (yeah, folks: lingerie, again) in a dressroom (is that right in english?) in some ladies-store with a "salesman" joining her - and with a lot of slow handjob and 69 on the floor - and maybe climax with a titfuck where she is stark naked....


I go along with you, except for the salesman. I am thoroughly familiar with my equipment and don't need to see his. :-) Now if it was a sales lady!!

10-10-08  08:55am - 5918 days #29
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


We have looked at the issue of allowing anonymous Trust Ratings several times now and at this point, it's unlikely that we'll change that policy. To us, the value of having Users feel they can give a rating w/out fear of reprisal far outweigh the few who just hate not knowing who gave them a negative rating.

If I might be so bold as to point out ...

If the reason for a NO Trust rating is (perceived by the receiver) seen as not containing enough helpful info, then what possible difference would it make if you knew who the person was? Only one that I can see, the chace to "get even". To date, we've never allowed "because he gave me a negative vote" as a valid reason for a No Trust vote.

While we encourage all users to make NON-anonymous ratings, we feel that continuing to allow them is the better way to go at this stage. We are aware that a small percentage of our Users disagree with this policy.


Okay, you got me convinced, Khan! :-)

10-10-08  07:33am - 5918 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks for the tip, Khan (and Kevin.) I must say I feel embarrassed after looking at the details concerning the trust votes I cast. I won't elaborate except to say that my memory has been giving me false information concerning this subject. :-)

Well, this thread has convinced me of one thing and that is to start using the trust ratings more often. From now on, if I see a review that is well done I will cast a yes vote, if I see a review that's not so hot (too lacking in detail), I'll keep silent, if I see an obvious attempt at deception or something that is hopelessly inadequate I'll cast a no.

10-09-08  06:14pm - 5918 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Strange, but I never realized the importance of trust ratings until this thread came along.

I should have known better because I was quite pleased with the positive trust ratings I got when I first started out, they were a bit of an ego booster, seeing that they came from total strangers, while the one negative rating I got at the beginning took me down because I couldn't figure out the reason behind it. *I* knew I could be trusted! LOL.

I basically saw the trust ratings as a good tool to let a shill know that I was on to his game, not realizing that to many it might be a bit of a reward for the conscientious work they put into their reviews.

Because I don't know to whom I gave a couple of trust ratings in the beginning I want to let you know that I do trust each and every one of the regular users to give me an honest review of a site. I may not always agree with them but I do trust them. Too bad there are so many of us or I would correct matters by adding a positive trust to each.

And I agree with one poster: anonymous ratings, positive or negative, should not be allowed.

10-07-08  01:44pm - 5920 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Hey Messer the secrest to a new car right now is to go the last weekend of the month. these guys are so desprerate they'll practically give you a BJ as a bonus to buy theior car. Ps not joking was a 32,000 car got it for 14,000 which is under half.


On porn, well I think many sites have become mechanical in reatheir production. Old school porn was way different. But I can't hardly tell the difference on some sites like Brazzers and Bangbro that its a new scenes. Because look like same thing just different ppl.
Thats why I try and look not just for the mass content butmaybe some class acts along the way. You know that model that could be homless and still be hot. Thats what keeps me looking is the search when they make new stuff and I think they cound on ppl like me to do that.


Let me know when you find something really different! As you said, presently it's often different people but the same old scene. I am even willing to consider hc, just give me something that makes me sit up: Wow, that's something I've never seen before. :-) Do you ever use the trial of a siteto help you find something new? Or do you just subscribe hoping that this one is different?

10-06-08  02:13pm - 5921 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I actually have slowed, the last few reviews are about the last of 7 more I have left to do. I bought a car brand new 1/2 priced to give you and idea of the economy, and need the cash for insurance and such. I will still particiate but may be sometime before I can afford 3 -4 sites a month like I have been doing for along time., notice porn sites rasining prices which isnt cool either. But servers are getting available every month and the ppl need to charge more and its passed on to us.
I just closed my server after 8 years due to cost. have a few domains still but will only have a handful by next year.

But I have some awsome adult stuff to so not to worried,
I have allot I havent seen yet so will be new to me to sort through.

Cybertoad.



Hey, congratulations on getting a car half-priced. I hope that practice will spread in the months to come because I'm due for a new one. I had my present one for some time.

As to subscriptions, I decided the other day to let them all (3) expire without subscribing to any new ones unless I find THE site in the meantime: Female, solo or g/g, 50's, 60's, 70's lingerie, progression from fully dressed to completely naked. There's too much disappointment associated with too many of the ones I've looked at and reviewed lately. Or maybe I'm just getting jaded. :-)

10-06-08  01:12pm - 5921 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by surferman:


What about you going to a store to buy lingerie for your partner. A sexy young assistant comes up and asks if you need help. You ask her what she thinks, and she suggests you go into a changing room with her and she will try it on for you, and also tries taking it off for you. Dreaming again.


I buy your scene one-hundred percent!

10-06-08  01:09pm - 5921 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


What's that old expression, might have been from the '60's, something like "It's a lot better to go through times of dope but no money than to go through times of money but no dope."

Something like that.



I take that to mean porn stays, food goes! :-)

10-06-08  12:50pm - 5921 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


There's a long, deep recession threatening not only North America but Europe and Asia as well. Money will be tight in many homes. Do you think subscriptions to pay sites will go way down or would we rather give up that roast and switch to Kraft Dinners in order to feed the porn habit? Now we'll find out if our pastime is just a nice distraction or a true addiction! :-)

10-06-08  12:38pm - 5922 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by dghillza:


From what I gather most of us download tons of porn - most of which we may never see - Why ? I should answer this question myself but I don't really have a good reason why I pull Gigs of porn down every night - my idiotic answer is because I can !!!


I used to ask myself the same question but events during the last week or so make me glad that I have downloaded porn I haven't even looked at yet. One important factor is the value of the American Dollar as measured against my currency, the Canadian Dollar. I've seen MY dollar lose ten percent of its value during the past two weeks, so, if it gets too expensive to subscribe to an American site I'll have all that material on my hard drive that I haven't looked at yet.

Number two, as someone else pointed out, one cannot always count on the climate to stay this liberal. There might very well come a time when the pendulum swings back and the whole works will become illegal again. It may not happen but there's always that chance.

10-03-08  10:21am - 5925 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Thaeral:


I've only given negative trusts to reviewers who appeared to be just giving positive reviews to boost the sites review score. They're more advertisements than genuine reviews and that bugs me. And it has to be obvious. So I haven't given very many negative trusts out.

It never occurred to me to give a negative trust for someone I don't agree with. It's not that I distrust them, I simply don't agree with them. I figured it was enough to not give the trust. *shrugs*


Yes, that's been my policy, too. Obvious shills that give you nothing but a couple of glowing lines of recommendation and a 99 in a "review" are my targets, but even then I very seldom bother giving them a negative trust. They are so transparent in their effort to sell a site that I assume anyone with any brain at all can see that.

10-02-08  04:32pm - 5925 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I can only guess: ATK Natural and Hairy? Noticed a couple of really short recent "reviews" that mostly read like ads and not reviews, anyway. They were just before and after yours.

And the negative comment was "Not a good revue (sic)." I didn't realize we had to be in show business! ;)

Well, don't sweat it. It doesn't reflect on you. And I've had negatives that to me just didn't make sense. Somehow, they disappeared eventually. The folks at PU actually go to the trouble to track down shills, so maybe that's got something to do with it. Or not. Who knows? But it's just a stupid annoyance.

Your review of ATK Natural and Hairy was informative, much more than those quick 'n dirty ones with the scores of "90." And I was glad to read your review, just to confirm that the site really hasn't changed. The photo quality WAS pretty poor sometimes, and some of the women on the site were just ugly!

I haven't been there for quite some time. Those "90" reviews do nothing to persuade me to return.


Thanks, Drooler. I just had to vent a bit over that one because it was unfair in my eyes, and "anonymous" always triggers me, especially when it attacks my credibility/ honesty. In the case of ATK I told it as I saw it, isn't that what a reviewer is supposed to do? There are a couple of other porn icons I find highly overrated and not worth all the nineties they are getting. In my eyes, I must stress! I guess that'll knock another couple of "trust" points off when I get around to reviewing them. :-)

10-02-08  01:19pm - 5925 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by wiild1:


Just a minor bias, rude behaviour on the forum or a disgreement in taste from mine is not enough for "Negative Trust".


When it comes to trust ratings I think I've just been zapped by someone over a disagreement in taste. He makes a comment that my review was bad without letting me know which review he is commenting on and why he thinks it's bad and then, to add insult to injury he does it anonymously. Does anyone else have problems with "anonymous?"

10-01-08  03:59pm - 5926 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Miths:


Definitely widescreen - it's a waste of good screen space with those damn black bars at the sides of my 16:9 HDTV and 16:10 monitor.
But obviously content and models do take priority over screen aspect :), so I still watch a lot of 4:3 porn, but I really think widescreen for anything video content shot within the last year or so isn't too much to ask for.


I think it would also be nice if photographers remembered that many people with widescreen monitors like to look at pictures in 16:9! (complaining about "portrait style" pictures is my hobbby!) :-)

09-29-08  12:54pm - 5928 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Well, it's not Firefox because I don't use it and I'm seeing the same thing.

We're looking into the problem now.

Thx

Added a few minutes later:
Kevin tells me it's fixed now.
Thanks again for the heads up



I'm always awed at how quickly you guys respond! Thanks, Khan. You have no idea how much you are doing for this site through your hands-on attitude!

09-29-08  12:15pm - 5929 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
By the way: Khan if you are looking in. I was trying to answer the above through my usual: REPLY W/QUOTE but couldn't do it because a little screen: "Important notification" kept jumping up .. WITHOUT the important notification! :-) Is it you? Is it my updated Firefox?
Thanks.

09-29-08  12:10pm - 5929 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Riffy wrote:

Quote:

"My TV is 16:9 and my laptop is widescreen too.

There's not a lot on TV nowadays in Britain that is in 4:3. Actually I can't think of anything that's in 4:3

Lots of adult stuff on the web is still in 4:3 though.

You either get black bands top and bottom or left and right I imagine whichever screens you have...

I prefer 16:9 though!" End of quote

Don't I wish I lived in Britain! We are still way behind here in Canada when it comes to programs in 16:9. I subscribe to about 16 High Definition channels on TV and am lucky to get the odd show in widescreen, mostly in Prime Time.

As to Porn Sites, that was one of the reasons I subscribed to "In The Crack" and "FTV Girls" because they are now HD and 16:9. I am actively looking for similar sites because on my widescreen monitor, the picture leaves you breathless!

09-17-08  07:56am - 5941 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
When it comes to reviews I am starting to distrust quite a few of them if they mainly contain numbers and a rating, because I realize more and more what a difference age makes in one's assessment of a site. And I know I've said this before but I think it's important.

It is all well and good to say a site has so and so many models, so and so many videos/pictures, download speeds are such and such, but what every review needs (and usually contains) is an honest opinion of what makes the site so desirable to the user.

I just wish he/she would provide much, much more of his personal likes, dislikes about the site in the bottom line because the more detail he provides the better for me because that way I can say, naw I think I'll leave this site to someone else. I write this because of my negative experiences with with Twisty's, Galleria and FTV, all sites almost revered by the young!

But, to return to the subject, because I recognize that their reviews are honest, reflecting their tastes, they would never get a "dont trust" from me. As I wrote above, obvious shills are a different matter.

2401-2450 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 48 Page 49 50 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.