|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
messmer (0)
|
| 2551-2588 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 10 | 18 | 26 | 34 | 42 | 51 | Page 52 |
| 05-08-08 03:25pm - 6085 days | #5 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I think "Wal-Mart" did it. Cotton night shirts with smileys and Disney characters under "Intimate Apparel" ... for women???!!! Things have got so bad that anyone with an appreciation of something more alluring than white or pink cotton is called a fetishist. Thanks for letting me vent! :-) | |
|
||
| 05-08-08 11:39am - 6085 days | #3 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Oh, bless you, williamj! A crotchless, lacy panties site .. now there would be a site that would be next on my list! And hair yet! You must be over 30! Now I'm convinced that you would like the site we talked about. Much hair to be found there. | |
|
||
| 05-08-08 09:18am - 6086 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You'd swear this world was full of latent pedophiles the way they all take to those cute little girls in cotton panties. Just came back from ATK Galleria's upskirt update and there's not a single attractive piece of lingerie to be seen .. cotton, cotton and more cotton, that's all. Plain cotton, printed cotton, full cotton, cotton bikinis, cotton thongs ... I might as well be looking at men's shorts. The only feminine lingerie you see these days is worn by transvestites. Help, I'm being left behind! :-) | |
|
||
| 05-06-08 07:00pm - 6087 days | #26 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Greenish mud would definitely not be on my list of things to see, drooler. I don't think that trend will go anywhere, except with the "artistic" crowd. I could never see those sand encrusted bodies either. | |
|
||
| 05-05-08 09:58am - 6089 days | #4 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Glimpses is all you'll ever get because most webmasters throw everything that shows a clothed crotch into the niche "upskirt." ATK Galleria has an upskirt section but most of the sets are not very satisfying because they are not true upskirt. They may be staged and done with full cooperation but, to me, the angle in many of the sets is wrong. The camera should always be at floor level pointing up, unless the model stands on a ladder which is okay, too. At least that's my view of "upskirt!" | |
|
||
| 05-05-08 09:44am - 6089 days | #24 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I'm heartened to see that some of my fellow forum members are longing not only for porn videos with a story but also for models who have a few imperfections. Hooray, there's hope after all. I thought most porn lovers preferred the "Stepford Sluts" (Toadsith) because that's all you ever see except for the models in some of the more extreme niches. There is such a blandness to perfection! | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 08:45am - 6095 days | #13 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I prefer pictures for the same reason you dislike them: no sound. If only those videographers shut up with their mindless babble/banter/so-called interviews I might watch videos more often. I also like pictures because there's more room to use one's imagination. There are also certain pictures that give me exactly the shot/angle I am looking for. If I stopped a video in the same spot it would be blurred like all screen captures. On the other hand I am starting to despair of ever getting a decent picture set because most are taken in portrait format which I despise. My latest crusade on the pay sites I subscribe to is to convince the web masters to mix up their sets a bit more, like half portrait, half landscape. If anyone will ever listen and do something about it, who knows! Few porn users seem to be bothered by it. | |
|
||
| 04-25-08 06:18pm - 6098 days | #16 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Nor have I. I wish the web master of one popular site would contact me because I'd like to give him an earful about the inadequacies of his customer support "specialist." | |
|
||
| 04-25-08 01:19pm - 6098 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
There's that satiation factor again. One keeps hunting for the new and different and after a while the hunt becomes just as important as one's ever growing library of porn. There's tons of material on my extra hard drive that I haven't even looked at yet .. and still I keep hunting for more ... and especially for different. | |
|
||
| 04-25-08 01:09pm - 6098 days | #3 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
To Wittyguy: No, I don't read blogs but will look at some of your links just for the fun of it. You never know I might like them. To JB: I hate it when, in a video, I hear the guy who is making the video give whispered instructions to the model! THAT is the turn-off for me (among other things like the ones you mentioned). | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 06:10pm - 6101 days | #13 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Sorry I brought it up the subject, malikstarks! <smile> | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 06:08pm - 6101 days | #27 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for complaining, JB. I personally can't understand how these sites stay in business with those huge promotions marring every picture. But maybe I'm too anal about the subject, ahem! | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 01:59pm - 6101 days | #24 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
One thing I would like to add to what makes a good pay site and that is: small watermarks (Logos). I could never subscribe to a site like XL Girls.com, 40plus.mag, The Score Group etc. because of their huge, intrusive self-promotions. Anyone subscribe to any of these sites and have you ever complained to the web master about the subject? Or does it bother you at all? | |
|
||
| 04-21-08 12:24pm - 6102 days | #37 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Couldn't have put it better myself. As a matter of fact I've complained a few times about the very same thing in here, through comments, reviews, or in the forum. Porn as it is dished out on many video sites and certainly on late night cable TV is incredibly boring for the reasons you stated. I just watched "Deep Throat" yesterday and while it's not exactly Oscar material .. what a difference .. it's got a story line (corny admittedly), female stars that don't hiss and moan: "Yes, oh yes, oh God, oh yes," male stars that don't keep going: "Fuck, yes!" Pathetic this new type of porn and as you said boring as hell because if you've seen one movie produced after a certain date you've seen them all. | |
|
||
| 04-15-08 09:07am - 6109 days | #25 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Oh, www. And here I thought we were on the same wave length. You like pantyhose? There was nothing like seeing the wind whip up a lady's skirt to reveal stockings and a stretch of white thigh! Pantyhose killed that voyeur's dream! <grin> I like all kinds of sexy under- and nightwear myself. It cannot be cotton, though ... that's another killer of the libido. | |
|
||
| 04-15-08 09:00am - 6109 days | #9 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Cotton panties, along with pantyhose spelled the death of alluring undies. Heavy sigh!!! But I do like pubic hair. Hairy legs I can do without. | |
|
||
| 04-15-08 08:55am - 6109 days | #12 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
We don't need Freud to explain our porn preferences, do we? <smile> | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 06:17pm - 6109 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, littlejoe. My experience with ATK (hairy) was positive except for the videos, so I will definitely have a look at their archives. | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 06:14pm - 6109 days | #6 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, about the happy hunting, www! I like the Village Ladies very much. Retro look, retro lingerie. On the surface ordinary women baring it all to the world .. which makes it very sexy but I have the same problem you have with the picture size, many of them are still in an 800 x 600 pixels format and those are the larger ones. I don't mind one bit "not good looking" models. To me the beauty is in the courage to expose to the world something that many think is flawed. I can't stand the hats, though!! Of all the sites Aunt Judy really came closest to what I was and am looking for but, as I stated somewhere else, it is starting to look as if they are letting it die a slow death in order to draw users to their new (and classier) site. I also had problems with the fact that they first improved and then moved their older picture sets to their Archives which required another subscription. Must look in on Scores Naughty Mag, so thanks. | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 06:04pm - 6109 days | #5 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for the tip, malikstarks. 40something.mag would come close to what I am looking for if it weren't for that cotton picking intrusive, obnoxious, oversize watermark on every picture. I wish their faithful members would voice a complaint about it. It's almost as annoying as some of those amateur sites that put the watermark right in the middle of the picture. Hardcore isn't terribly important to me because I prefer solo. If it has to be hard core g/g is fine with me. :-) Must check into whereismywife.com. Thanks again. | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 01:33pm - 6109 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
.... I need guidance from those of you who have been at it longer than I have when it comes to pay sites and are in their forties or fifties. I am looking for a site that contains models 40 - 60, (consider my age,I feel almost like a dirty old man looking at all those teenies found in most sites), natural, ordinary looking is fine with me. AllOver30 won't do because all of their "older" women look as if they are in their twenties (at least to me), same with Karups, same with "Older Women." "Aunt Judy" wasn't bad but is rapidly going downhill in my estimation. If anyone knows of a reputable site that fits the bill please let me know. Desperately yours! :-) | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 12:09pm - 6109 days | #11 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I believe we are becoming too jaded, Denner. We've been to too many places and have seen too much and the thrill is starting to fade, that's why I believe that "niche" sites will eventually disappear to be replaced by ones that have a bit for every taste. Networks attempt to do that but don't pay enough attention to some of their sites who go dead for lack of updates. When it comes to single sites there hasn't been a single one, no matter how good, that didn't become ho-hum for me well within my trial month. Who knows maybe the various legislators in different countries won't even have to make laws against Internet Porn, maybe we'll all simply lose interest, except for the very young among us. I hope I won't live to see that day! :-) When it comes to follow-ups I still feel that we should go by first impression, rather than by how we feel after we've been at a site for a while. I don't think there's a single one that wouldn't drop in the ratings if we rated it after we've been there for a while (especially longer than a month) because of the boredom factor. On the other hand follow ups might be good to alert users to the fact that a site has really slipped. So there's an argument to be made for both positions. Signing off to look for a wild and crazy site! :-) | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 03:25pm - 6110 days | #9 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Laugh .. and you definitely have a gift with words! Love this forum, I think I'm getting addicted to it. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 12:57pm - 6110 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Foodplay ... eeek! I totally agree with you when it comes to toys. I had read someone's assessment of Simon scans and thought I'd give it a look. Nothing but toys, so I passed. I would like to see more diversity within a site when it comes to age, weight, lingerie, no lingerie, hair, no hair etc. In other words, something for everyone. Not just a steady diet of the sleek, shaved late teens to early twenties that everyone seems to be enamored with. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 10:42am - 6110 days | #5 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Replying to malikstarks: You are right this does relate closely to the other thread. I hadn't paid attention to that one. But thanks for the input. I needed to hear that others feel the same way! | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 10:39am - 6110 days | #4 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Yes, I basically feel the same way. Judge as if you were seeing what a site has to offer for the first time. I had a similar problem you had with All Internal. Mine was with Abby Winters. And that's why my question this morning. Would it be fair to go back and change a rating just because one got bored? Abby's was the first review I ever did and I was absolutely gushy about the site (as you might have noticed I'm always carrying on about wanting to see "natural models" and not Barbies) yet the excitement wore off very quickly because, in my opinion, Abby sticks to her formula too closely and after a while you tend to get bored with the sameness even though the models change. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 08:24am - 6111 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Have you ever been tempted to downgrade your original review of a site because, after a while, the boredom factor struck when you realized that your highly rated source of porn was being repetitious and stuck too closely to a formula rather than offer something new and different once in a while? | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 08:15am - 6111 days | #22 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Toadsith, you gave a reasonable explanation. I still can't get myself to like "portrait" it's just like using one's wide screen LCD or Plasma TV to watch a 4:3 picture. BTW, I like your description of some of the sets as "distressed style." You do see a lot of those. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 08:10am - 6111 days | #21 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Amazing, someone who agrees with me. And didn't I write almost exactly the same thing in my remarks at Twistys! Thanks for confirming that I'm not alone. | |
|
||
| 04-12-08 08:45am - 6112 days | #10 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I couldn't give you any personal favorites but prefer smallish - just short of large and slightly saggy! And definitely no silicone ... ever! Those plumped up, rigid abominations turn me off. | |
|
||
| 04-12-08 07:23am - 6112 days | #17 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
[QUOTE=Denner]: "Tours/preview - thats first and foremost. I want to see or get a GOOD idea of what I'm paying for. For this user its primarely the preview of videos: type, quality, formats and amounts. Do not get it, that there's still users who go for sites where there is no real preview - and why do they not have that? Well, most of them are worthless anyway. Models! Its importent to see who's in the site and how many sets or videos each model have - Pix and Video still give you that, 1ByDay now only show each model and not their sets/videos (in preview). In general the selection of models is importend for a fine site - both hc and soft." (End of quote) I completely agree with you, Denner. I turned my back on half a dozen sites only yesterday because they had a very limited free tour. The crammed a few faces and bodies on pages one and two of their "preview" and then took you to the sign-up. The whole thing reeked of "done on the cheap!" Too bad, because they fit myniche perfectly! | |
|
||
| 04-12-08 07:16am - 6112 days | #16 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Toadsith, Drooler and others have made such detailed and valuable suggestions that I have nothing to add except one thing and that might be a personal idiosyncrasy. Because I prefer pictures to videos I would like to see each set zipped (as already mentioned by others) and have it contain a larger percentage of the pictures in "Landscape" format. Twistys and Allover30 are two examples of how NOT to do it because about 95 percent of their output is in Portrait. I like a picture that takes up the full width of my monitor. | |
|
||
| 04-10-08 01:03pm - 6113 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I can't see the sense in breaking up the site. I was a member for a while but got bored with ALL of the contents (intimate moments, g/g, solo) quite quickly. At first I loved the naturalness of the models, such a refreshing difference from all the glamorous, made up, pouty barbies on other sites, but then found that I had the same problem except this time with more down to earth, natural models. There just wasn't enough diversity in the place. Now if she were to split the site up into Abby Winters Young and Abby Winters Mature (over her dead body most likely) I'd subscribe to the latter. I like 'em natural and a bit older than 30. | |
|
||
| 04-10-08 10:14am - 6113 days | #28 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Our movie network (TMN) shows porn every day after midnight and I can no longer stand the sight of Randy Spears! Actually he's likable, seems to be a pretty good actor, too, BUT HE'S IN EVERY MOVIE THEY SHOW! There only seem to be about six porn actors in Porno Valley. | |
|
||
| 04-10-08 09:23am - 6114 days | #18 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
My dream site would be made up of ordinary, mature, NATURAL women without tattoos, piercings and enhanced breasts, wearing lingerie that fits their age,(in other words no thongs or those horrible styro foam bras and definitely no cotton!) stripping slowly down to the buff and then doing some nasty stuff. Please don't recommend true amateur sites, the quality is too poor and most faces are hidden. I'd be happy as long as the models looked amateur. Tall order, I know. I wonder if there are others who would subscribe to that niche? | |
|
||
| 04-09-08 02:56pm - 6114 days | #22 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I don't remember "The Erotic Adventures Of Candy" but I do remember the humor and nylons and garter belts .. darn it! | |
|
||
| 04-09-08 10:00am - 6115 days | #16 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Ah, twisted movies! My favorite kind! I like the unpredictable and unusual. | |
|
||
| 04-09-08 09:24am - 6115 days | #14 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I hear you, jd! Didn't we comment on this very subject in another place? American Porn is too formulaic and I cringe every time I hear one of those phony cries of passion coming from the "actors", or see one more scene of the porn star, who is supposed to be in the midst of rapturous sex, look over to the camera and then move the hair out of her face so the camera can get a better shot of the fine job she's doing. Short hair should be a requirement for all porn actresses since oral sex has become such an important part of the average video. Allow me to be nostalgic along with you and pine a bit for the days when the movies still had a story (now matter how far fetched) and the first part of the movie was spent setting the scene and mood for what was to come. Trouble is, now all the producers assume that the main attraction by itself is what everyone wants to see and that filming the rest is just a waste of time and money. But, who knows, maybe tastes have changed on me and the younger porn users do indeed prefer to "jump right in" rather than wait a couple of minutes to see models get slowly and sensually undressed, preferably shedding lots of undies in the process, in other words, a bit of a tease, just like Salome with the seven veils. I hate it when the porn star whips off her sweater and wears nothing under it but her silicone breasts and then unzippers a skirt to reveal that she "prefers" to go commando. Oh, the monotony of it all .. but someone must like it or they wouldn't keep making cookie cutter porn. | |
|
||
| 2551-2588 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 10 | 18 | 26 | 34 | 42 | 51 | Page 52 |
|
