Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

851-900 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 17 Page 18 19 24 29 34 39 44 51 52 Next Page >

01-26-12  02:09pm - 4714 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
My warmest congratulations to my friends Denner and the Cap'n!
Sorry, Cap'n, you escaped my eagle eye when it was your turn!

01-22-12  10:16am - 4718 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
One more reason not to use web hosting services:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-5736335...mp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20

01-19-12  10:58am - 4721 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm fine with performers that have a few small tattoos here and there but less so when they are near the crotch or breast.


That's where I stand when it comes to the subject of tattoos, Pat. As to piercings, belly button I don't mind but I would hate to kiss a little piece of metal on a nipple or clit hood.

01-18-12  10:04am - 4722 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I feel the same way as Pat. I would not entrust my stash to a cloud based system. THEY can get at it and view it. My porn remains with me and my heavily encrypted externals!

01-18-12  10:00am - 4722 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks very much, Khan .. to you and to your company. I've been the recipient of quite a few raffle wins over the years and have always appreciated them ... especially since I am one of the unluckiest guys when it comes to winning anything!

Still wish more people were aware of the fringe benefits of being a member of this site. I am willing to bet many don't even know about PU and the tickets one can get for doing reviews, comments, replies etc.

01-12-12  06:57pm - 4727 days #54
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't know which genius came up with cum snorting but he might be the same guy that came up with pink eyes. In case some of you are ignorant of this particular fetish then it's basically when a girl gets a deliberate cum shot in her open eyes. That one still has a following with a portion of porn viewers. Where's the interest in that? Then again where's the interest in watching a girtl snort cum with her nose?

I don't think this kind of porn could be attibuted to porn addicts because I've been watching porn for avery long time and that kind of stuff has no appeal for me. I think it's far more likely to be because of younger porn viewers that have grown up watching retarded shows like jackass.


Well, I never gave your theory re. younger viewers a thought but you might be on to something, Pat! Who knows? I just, arbitrarily made a distinction between those who tend to remain content within their particular relatively softer niche and those who need ever increasing "hardness" in their porn. And that reminded me of addicts of harder drugs who have the same urge.

01-12-12  10:49am - 4728 days #48
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I think the blame for the tendency to produce more perverted and outrageous material can be squarely laid at the feet of porn addicts.

Most of us are users who are quite content to find nice material within the niche that interests us the most, but there is also a fair number who need something stronger and stronger as they go along .. just like any other addicts. They no longer get the kick they used to experience from main stream porn, just as users of opiates need ever increasing quantities of their favorite poison.

PS. VideoBox only yesterday published a video where the "stars" snorted semen through a straw!!! It just confirmed to me that I have not yet reached the addict stage. What made it even worse was the fact that Tanner Mayes participated in that. TANNER MAYES, for Pete's sake. Edited on Jan 12, 2012, 10:54am

01-10-12  02:05pm - 4730 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


You have the region correct for me.

Other than that we haven't made much progress yet!

Cap'n.


I'm afraid you are right, Cap'n. No progress in ANYTHING! I have been looking in vain for a site to subscribe to for over a month while AO30 bores me to tears at the moment, as does VideoBox, both of them longer term subscriptions.

01-10-12  01:08pm - 4730 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Well, ALSSCAN uses a lot of Eastern European Models if your Eastern Europe starts with Hungary or the Czech Republic. I found that 21Sextury also used quite a few models from what used to be behind the Iron Curtain. So does the Ferro Network, but they would be too hardcore for you, Cap'n.

01-10-12  01:03pm - 4730 days #40
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, Ed and Simon. I sort of figured that you wouldn't keep track of every individual subscriber and what he downloads (except when he downloads excessively) but was hoping!

01-09-12  03:39pm - 4730 days #37
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by SimonSubAms:


Initially people joining tend to download a lot but then settle down after a few days to downloading what they like rather than everything.


That's exactly what I do, Simon. One question: do webmasters keep track of what an individual subscriber downloads when it comes to the daily updates?

I keep hoping they do because, this way, my lack of enthusiasm for most updates in a given week might count as a protest!

01-08-12  07:15pm - 4731 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


Thanks for the info.

I wish the site like 1by-day had models with a little more full figures asnd boobs. A site like that would be ideal for what I am looking for.


Most sites cater to younger people who prefer slim and waif-like to the more natural, plumper form. Seeing that you are not a teenager may I suggest you have a look at All Over 30? The chances of finding a woman with a bit of meat on her bones are greater in that age group. I have a hunch they might still not be what you are looking for because few are exactly plump.

"Plumper Pass" would have been great for you if you liked videos but their pictures aren't that good. Sorry, that's all I can come up with.

01-07-12  09:59am - 4733 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


The cameras are ready to roll. Everybody's in place, The director is stationed, ready to give the �action� order. His two stars nervously awaiting their moment to prove their acting skills.
The order is given: �Action please!�
The MILF scene opens with what appears to be a bored Mom setting on her couch reading a book.
Like most household-wives, she�s dressed normally: short skirt to the cheeks of her ass, panties exposed, and a pair over-nourished hooters seemingly struggling to escape the tight confines of bra cups the size of satellite dishes.
A knock at the door! It�s one of her son�s school buddies. Although looking a tad older than his age, we accept the fact he�s a tender lad whose genes and growth-hormones simply got carried away.
�Eh, hi. Mrs. Adams. Is Rick around?�
Mom explains her son�s absence and invites the stubble-hair-faced teen inside -- where she promptly guides him to the sofa (strategically seating herself close enough for her pussy to begin snapping at the boy�s knees.)
�You�re Jason, aren�t you", Mrs. Adams asks with a salacious smile. �Well, er, I mean yes I am, Mrs. Adams."
"Say, Can you, like, tell Rick to call me. We�re meeting for soccer practice later.�
�Just call me Pam. Needn�t be so formal", purrs Mom."
"Just think of me as a friend. You know, like a girl you might be close to at school.� At this point Pam's hand is resting on Jason's knee.
(If I were Jason�s age, by now my knees would be so shakin� so violently I�d need a restrainer on the level of industrial strength duct tape.)
Jason, however, gives a half-ass attempt to convince us of his innocence by at first reacting awkwardly, stumbling on words and somewhat retreating to the far side of the sofa. But as Pam becomes more aggressive -- Jason's confidence grabs a foothold.
They kiss.
Now, with Jason�s inhibitions orbiting the sun, his hand touching her thigh, inching its way to the soft, moist, cleave resting between her legs, Pam immediately begins her journey into a stentorian wale of erogenous pandemonium -- screaming as though she was being chased by The Texas chainsaw wielder.
Boyish Jason, meanwhile, is suddenly employing a worldly love-making prowess akin to a sexual titan.
(Pretty damned good for a high school teenager, I�d say. The kid learns fast.)

Contrary to sane judgment, The idea of Rick coming through the door, or hubby unexpectedly coming home, seems furthermost from either of their minds.
Pam's spastic cries of delight gains momentum, heightening even before Jason�s hand finds its marks.
By the time Jason is atop Pam, pumping away, her squeals, pitched moans, Ahhhs, Oooohs, Owooos and oh yes�s are going non-stop. Decibel ratings approaches china-shattering levels.
As the action intensifies, Pam's repeated oh-yeahs joins in to vocal volumes reaching nuclear proportions. Seismic waves begin appearing on the town�s Richter scale -- as neighbors are running through the streets in panic.
Coast Guard goes on alert, as our president hovers at his red phone.

There you have it.....maybe.
I won�t even go into the ecstatic moments of Pam�s orgasm.
But I think by now one gets my drift.

Exaggerated? sure, but so�s the industry�s continuous apathy for not improving on the quality of their product.

simply harken to some of the cow-pie we�re still getting from, and relentlessly being doled out to by our porn purveyors. We're underestimated and taken for granted my friends. Dammit! Just Give us purchases intellectuality befitting our place, ideally shaving down the idea we're falling for this crap.


(Scratching my head): Why does this story sound so familiar?

There is one jarring omission in your summary, graymane: you forgot to mention that the "boy" is wearing Bermuda shorts past his knees and a baseball cap on backward! If that's not in it it isn't a true "MILF attacking boy" story! Edited on Jan 08, 2012, 10:03am

01-06-12  07:44pm - 4733 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


As I was sitting, reflecting (well, I don't have much else to do except worry about my wife) I was wondering what good our polls do if they do not accurately reflect how the average Porn User feels. I mean, if we are lucky we get 30 people to respond to an interesting question .. hardly a meaningful sample.

On a happy personal note, but still on the same subject as you will see shortly I, for one, am very pleased at the excellent chance I have of winning our weekly draw when only a couple of hundred tickets are out against the 9 or so I hold in my electronic hand but as delighted as I am about my wins I can not help but think that this is not what the founders of Porn Users had in mind when they first started the weekly draw ... that it be won by a handful, over and over.

Same as I am constantly tickled pink when it comes to the intimate and friendly atmosphere in our beloved Forum, yet disturbed at the same time because there are only so few of us.

I think I would rather take a chance on the occasional turmoil in this august group if there were increased participation. One positive side effect would also be that, the greater our number ... in the polls, in the forum ... the more web masters/owners would look in to see what's popular and what isn't and we could exert some real influence.

I would be happier if thousands of tickets were out against my 9 and I would be a lot more excited about the results of our polls if a couple of hundred people had voted, rather than 30.

Therefore a question to Khan and management: Is there any way that the many registered members of PU/TBP who have stayed at the fringes could be informed by general email of all the extras that we few enjoy at the moment and be invited warmly to participate a bit more?

This post was brought on because I found to my shock, the other day, that there are actually folks who have been faithfully using TBP as a guide and gateway to porn sites, yet who are blissfully unaware of all the neat fringe benefits their registration brought with it?

What are your opinions on the subject(s)?

I've had my say and will keep quiet now because I don't know of anything I could add to the observations above. Have at it, mateys ... or not!

01-06-12  07:09pm - 4733 days #29
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Messmer, are you in the Maritimes too?


Yep, right next door to you in beautiful Nova Scotia, rearadmiral, in HRM (Halifax Regional Municipality).

01-06-12  03:01pm - 4734 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


It all comes down to marketing.

Offer a good enough deal to make a sale.
Sometimes they guess it wrong & when they find that out, then they surruptitiously try to claw something back!

Cap'n.


I think the "suits" guess it wrong more often than not, Cap'n!

01-06-12  10:33am - 4734 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Download speeds are increasing much faster than filesizes. Whilst resolution of video has increased massively, greatly improved compression codecs means that file sizes have not gone up proportionately.
My local cable ISP is launching a 250Mb/s service in a few months time and predicting that by 2015 they will be offering 1Gb/s to most customers. Personally I find that my 30Mb/s connection is plenty fast enough, but I'm only one step above the minimum they offer now and it comfortably streams FullHD video.


I had a tiff with my ISP a few months ago. They had promised me a few years ago that they would never impose bandwidth limits and then decided to put a limit of 250GBs on my 4.0 MB/s connection with a usurious penalty for every extra GB used.

When I threatened to cancel the technician told me why don't you go back to a 2.0MB/s connection. There are no bandwidth restrictions on the slower speeds. I now pay 10 dollars less a month, and find my download and streaming speeds very adequate at around 2.3MB/s if a site's server is capable of handling it, or isn't throttling speeds.

Strange thing though, why would anyone offer extremely high speeds that make it possible to make the fullest use of all the multimedia contents on the Web and then punish you FOR doing just that??

01-06-12  10:12am - 4734 days #28
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by SimonSubAms:


Some people prefer pictures, some people prefer videos.
Some people prefer streaming, some prefer download.
I've found the best way is to offer as many options as possible with the downloads being the best quality, bigger file sizes.

I've recently had webmasters contacting me asking me to take down my downloads and go streaming only and that if everyone sticks together it will stop piracy and bring back sales.
I told them in no uncertain terms that I thought it was the most stupid idea I'd heard to date.
There's nothing worse for business than putting stupid restrictions on legitimate, paying users.


You are right, Simon. That is the stupidest idea imaginable. People won't stick around with an "Oh, well, at least we still have streaming!" Only the small handful who might enjoy "streaming only" will do so. The rest of us are gone! In my case, guaranteed.

01-05-12  04:11pm - 4734 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^ I never could help anyone because there are very few models I know by name so I'm certainly not sick of helping out newbies.

I am starting to recognize some of the more famous (notorious) names but since I go for mature + lingerie (never mind who wears the skin or the garments) I am of no use to the seekers.

I've always admired your vast knowledge and your ability to go to the appropriate data bases to get information for others. I hope you won't weary of helping genuine calls for help! You do sound a bit tired of the whole thing???

01-05-12  04:05pm - 4734 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Interesting concept and one that could work if implemented properly and sites were transparent about it.


I agree, rearadmiral, after all we pay for different tiers of Internet service already. Anything from dial-up to ultra high speed.

01-05-12  01:24pm - 4735 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


And BTW: Thumbs should cover the entire set and in a size you can view without a magnifying glass - some can handle that.


Yes, that would be ideal, Denner. I praise "We Are Hairy" for doing this already (hope I don't come across as shilling for the site) and wish others would follow their example.

01-05-12  01:16pm - 4735 days #25
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


messmer, yeah, that wording might not work so well.


However, when the poll runs you'll notice it now has an "other" option which opens the door for you to add a reply addressing your pic-vs-vid issue.


Thanks, Khan. Consider one "other" added in advance.

01-04-12  08:02pm - 4735 days #753
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^There are some movies that I prefer watching in the privacy of my own home. This movie definetely falls under that category. I can't see myself sitting in a theater with a bunch of people watching such a dark movie where you have murder, incest, rape and sodomization of the main character, blackmail to name but a few.

In fact I think a large part of why this movie is doing so poorly is the choice of release date. The studio should have been smarter and released this at another time then Christmas. People prefer family movies and lighthearted comedies around the holidays. Another problem is probably that this is a remake of a foreign movie that was made 2 years ago and there was even a tv mini series done in 2010.
Which person who's seen the original version and enjoyed it will want to pay money to see an American version of the exact same film?


I agree with you in that I would rather watch it in the privacy of my house as well. There seemed to be a certain excitement about the Daniel Craig version earlier on in this thread and I was simply wondering how folks responded to this version. For me it would be a blessing to be able to look at the actors' faces, rather than at the subtitles.

01-04-12  07:55pm - 4735 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I think that from now on, I'll only join sites that are "ophthalmologist recommended."


Should be an absolute requirement!

Messmer, typing this in quadruply enlarged font (ctrl ++++) !!

01-04-12  07:39pm - 4735 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'll reply to your previous post and say that even if the link hadn't been to a tube site. I still claim that it would be nice to get a newbie to actually post a couple of times about something else and then asking for help. Of course I'm getting jaded when I see the first post from a new member is a link to identify a performer or scene and it's usually easy to know who it is or at least where you can find the answer since there's a watermark on the video.


I was just trying to give the poster the benefit of the doubt, Pat, seeing that I didn't see a link or a watermark. I WAS agreeing with you that it would be nice if a newbie posted a couple of times first and then asked for help.

01-04-12  04:07pm - 4735 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Maybe the term has changed ? In my day we ripped a site we took everything off a site right down to the icons and code.
If you had a data base we did that as well. Of course that was quite awhile ago, and the www was the wild wild west.
And of course I behave my self now days having had a brush or two tends to quiet your energetic, www experience..
I know use my expertise for Good.


I always wish I had been born a bit later because I would have loved to be able to do all the neat things youngster can do with a computer .. I am not talking about ripping sites, of course.

Well, I guess I should consider myself lucky that I learned how to use MS-DOS for certain basic functions and after that Windows 3.1 !

01-04-12  04:02pm - 4735 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


And another thing. On picture sites I wish they showed the thumbnails of the updates with the ladies fully clothed. It would help me subscribe to the site.

We know they are going to be naked later on in the set but I would personally love to see what they wear to start out with. It's important to me!

01-04-12  03:51pm - 4735 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I quite agree, D.

It is especially frustrating for us old hands with failing eyesight!

Cap'n.


Ayeyup! Man, I hate all the squinting I have to do these days.

01-04-12  03:46pm - 4735 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


To me, the term means someone who indiscriminately downloads an entire site in a very short space of time.

Cap'n.


That's what it has always meant to me as well, but that doesn't mean I'm right. I think yadayada's description of a site ripper would most likely be the correct one. So, rearadmiral, enjoy yourself. I wish I could find a site where I feel like downloading most of the content. Most of the time I'm through after a couple of days and end up waiting for a good update that never seems to come or at the most very rarely. Edited on Jan 04, 2012, 03:49pm

01-04-12  02:01pm - 4736 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by t9chome:


I hate 'em!

I always feel robbed & a little pissed when the site puts up a photo-video shoot or behind the scenes clip. Of the sites I've been a subscriber of ALS has to be the worst at this ploy to fill their scene commitment. 21st Sextury is also doing it with their BTS clips. At least most days, they will put up regular scenes as well. I don't mind video interviews, though.


Yes, I'm the same. I like interviews, I even liked ALS auditions but as I said I hated the photo-video shoots.

01-04-12  10:42am - 4736 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


But honestly, are most sites exclusively one or the other?

If you really think you have a better approach to the poll then by all means, make a submission (or two) and if they look like a better approach, I'll pull the original.

I fear, however, that since most sites aren't one or the other, trying to divide them in a poll question would (by its nature) leave out the majority of the existing adult sites)


What if the poll was worded: "Do you object to unrealistic download limits (like 10GB a day) when it comes to mixed video/picture sites, who carry most of their new videos in HD format?" Would that be manipulative? Never mind, I know the answer already.

I guess you are right, Khan. I was going by my preferences. For some reason,on mostly pictures sites I usually ignore the majority of the videos, while on mostly video sites I usually ignore the pictures. Why I do this, I dunno! See my signature.

01-04-12  10:32am - 4736 days #750
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Has anyone been to see "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo?" It doesn't appear to be doing that well at the Box Office. My daughter and son-in-law loved it .. did you?

01-04-12  10:24am - 4736 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I think indescriminate site ripping is counterproductive, both for the user who has to sift through the material later & certainly for the producers who will lose out substantially.

To Webmanagers,I say take reasonable measures & look at the residual loss as a form of advertising.

Cap'n.


I never did understand the desire to rip a whole site. Why would anyone want to do that? I've always ONLY downloaded material that gave me a certain erotic kick and have yet to find a site that has more than maybe 5 percent of material I really like ... if that much! I think every site I have ever subscribed to would tell you that my downloads are very modest after the first couple of days of enthusiasm when I quite naturally find a lot to like because of a large archive.

01-04-12  10:16am - 4736 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Did you think to ask AdultEmpire ... where you hot-linked the images from?


I take back what I wrote. I didn't know about the hot link!

01-04-12  10:14am - 4736 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I don't know about that!

A lot of us have plenty to say!

Cap'n.


You talkin' 'bout me?

01-04-12  10:12am - 4736 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
When I was a member of ALSScan I came across quite a few instances where people made favorable comments in connection with that sort of video.

ALSScan seems to have more than anyone else I have ever subscribed to.

I hated the videos that were actually nothing but records of photo shoots, so I am with you, graymane, but surprisingly there are quite a few who find those "behind the scenes of a shoot" videos great. To me they destroy the mood. Chacun a son gout, I guess. Edited on Jan 04, 2012, 10:48am

01-04-12  10:00am - 4736 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by JosiahE:


LOL Webmasters are a bunch of idiots then, All the porn sites I've joined are because i saw and liked their content which i downloaded from torrent sites.


Actually, as much as I am opposed to torrents and pirating you might have a point. I think the loss to the sites is often minimized by the advertising value of the material that is posted for free. I well remember from my usenet days how I was first led to ATK and then to Abby Winters because of the picture sets I found in newsgroups. I liked them but I wanted more, so I subscribed.

I had never heard of Porn review sites at that time until AW suggested TBP and I've been happily here ever since, and now get a good look at what sites have to offer through PU.

01-04-12  09:50am - 4736 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


The problem I see with that is that users do not agree on what download limits are acceptable. See Poll:
What download limit is acceptable?

With that said ...

When the site has known download limits (stated in terms, etc) we do list it in the site facts. Yet another reason to always check the site facts before joining.

P.S. (added later) ...
BTW, we're going to re-run that poll to see how current feelings are running.


Khan, I wonder if you re-run that poll if you couldn't have two successive ones: one for videos and one for pictures. It would give everyone a clearer picture. As I just wrote to rearadmiral, 10GB a day on a picture site would be completely acceptable, on a video site with HD content .. not!

01-04-12  09:47am - 4736 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Fair play, Khan. Lately I've been forcing myself to read every word written about a site both here and at TBP. It save some nasty surprises. And I agree that conceptually we can all agree that download limits may be bad, we might differ on what is acceptable. 10GB per day on a site with 3+GB HD files isn't acceptable, but 10GB a day on a picture site might be.


This is exactly how I feel rearadmiral. 10GB on a picture site would be more than sufficient and I don't think anyone except a site ripper would complain. However after checking my RK HD files again and seeing all of them weigh in at 3.3 GBs each then 10GB is a joke.

01-03-12  02:11pm - 4737 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I think currently most sites are experimenting with a wide variety of ways of stopping piracy. Sadly most, if not all, methods seem to impact the experience in some way for the non-pirate users.

It's a bit of a catch 22 situation. The choice seems to be adapt and lose customers or don't adapt and lose out to the pirates. Both routes can destroy a site.

My experience is that most users do not download photosets because they find it too tedious.

Currently I advertise the ability to download content as a feature, but I am very aware that there is a risk in that for me.

Just curious, what anti-piracy methods do you approve of?


I can't think of any, Ed. Honestly. Except that I wish that people would get away from the idea that if it's on the Internet it should be free!

I think those who have the savvy will grab whatever they want from a site no matter what steps that site might take but I might be wrong in this. I just know that I see no value in joining a site where I cannot download and watch the contents at my convenience.

I see a purpose in streaming only for hand held devices, maybe web owners concerned about having their contents stolen will eventually switch to phones and pads only and leave those of us with PCs high and dry. Only the future will tell.

As to pictures, I am a pictures fan and most of the sites I have subscribed to offer their sets in zipped format, so there's nothing tedious about that for me.

My personal opinion is that the site owners shoot themselves in the foot by becoming too protectionist and that their bottom line will reflect it down the road unless, see above, they switch completely to hand held where downloads are neither possible nor expected.

01-03-12  01:57pm - 4737 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by JosiahE:


No i mean, if all the stuff i queue to download doesn't finish within the 8 hour period it gets canceled, and i have to re-queue it.

I get such shit speeds aswell, during the day i get about 100-300kb/s and late at night (2am-8am) it might go up to 800kb/s

I have also contacted support multiple times, via email, and through their forum. But nothings been done to fix the issue.


I couldn't understand at first why anyone would queue downloads for an eight hour period unless they were doing a site rip but when reading about your speeds it became clear why you do what you do, Josiah! You have my hearty and sincere commiseration, 100-300kb/s is pathetic. How are you doing on other sites?

01-03-12  01:51pm - 4737 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Let me add my voice to that of the others, Denner. I like your Avatar as well. You wouldn't be Denner without it. Same as I would feel wrong about changing mine!

01-03-12  01:49pm - 4737 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Talking about Porno Dan, isn't he in a late night series called "The Right Hand" on Canadian HBO? The name "Immoral Studios" seems to ring a bell. It's about a young man who wants to get into the movie business and ends up being an assistant to a porn producer (Porno Dan). I only watched part of one show because nothing turns me off more than a behind the scenes glimpse into the industry. I would rather keep my illusions. They are few enough by now!

01-03-12  01:42pm - 4737 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, Marcus. You did some of us a favour by not only pointing out a site's flaws but also a site's improvements (Tia Ling.)

As to the rest of your post: I see your remarks and raise them to, "I would NEVER join a web site where you can't save videos. I would never join a web site where you can't download pictures."

And a warm welcome to this forum!

01-03-12  01:36pm - 4737 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^And another one from a brand new member. Wouldn't it be great if someone came here and introduced themselves and participated and then asked to identify a girl from a video or picture.


I have no problem with someone asking for info if there is no url to a tube site attached to the request, Pat. Sometimes it is hard to join a well established handful (and that's what we are) without a good reason. Asking for help is. I share your wistful thoughts to the full, though. It would be nice to get more new members to this forum. The rest of us are pretty well talked out!

m. recruiter for new blood

01-03-12  12:16pm - 4737 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


I thought this might be a good thread to allow PUs to list sites they run across that either no longer allow downloads and have become streaming only, allow downloads for a limited time only, or those who have imposed download limits.

I shall start with Reality Kings whose download limit is now 10 GBs a day. Thanks rearadmiral and others for bringing this to my attention. I was about to re-subscribe. I just looked at some of my older RK HD files and they average 3 GBs. At that size it wouldn't take long to reach the limit.

One of my formerly favorite sites 50plus MILFS/60plus MILFs also changed by making the downloads of their latest updates possible for a limited time only, with no chance to download anything older.

Any others? Help us save money and send a message to the web owners at the same time by sharing your bad experiences.

P.S. I know we have a comments section for that on each individual site's page but not everyone who got burned will leave a message so consider this an added extra for the smart consumer .. if that's okay with Khan.

01-01-12  12:31pm - 4739 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
The Norovirus set us back a few days so a belated Happy New Year to you and the staff, Khan, as well as all the regular users of this forum!

12-22-11  10:23am - 4749 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I think it refers to the fact that, especially for the more mature of us with failing eyesight, it is sometimes difficult to decypher what the code to be typed in should be.
It can be a bit of a lottery with some of the more obscure ones.
It becomes a risky business.

Cap'n.


Captcha, hated by me with a passion because I can't count the times I have been asked to re-submit this infernal extra obstacle to entering a site. That's where the failure comes in, Denner!

12-22-11  10:11am - 4749 days #169
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


OK....

I think it is safe now...

To return to topic.

I have recently rejoined All Over 30

I don't know whether the content has been retuned slightly, or if it is just the fact I hadn't visited for quite a while, but there is a lot of on topic material here, as well as the harder material.

I am pleased I went back to take another look.

Cap'n.


Welcome back, Cap'n. I rejoined myself recently and found all kinds of nice material but must confess that I've already mined it all and have quickly reached the stage where I have to depend on the daily updates.

Good thing they are hefty because even then I might only see one or two updates a week that really appeal to me. When it comes to the majority of sets or videos the ladies still forget to bring enough lingerie, or they are hardcore. Still the best mature site around, though!

12-22-11  09:59am - 4749 days #34
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
You are not getting the point, turboshaft. I am not looking for some softcore movie with a story. I just want the ladies to take more time (and the editors to stop their cutting) when it comes to the shedding of their clothes. The transition is too abrupt. One moment dressed, the next moment naked on her knees doing the usual ... !

851-900 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 17 Page 18 19 24 29 34 39 44 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.