Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

801-850 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 16 Page 17 18 23 28 33 38 43 51 52 Next Page >

03-07-12  10:40am - 4690 days #760
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I read John Carter when I was a teenager, because I was reading anything Burroughs wrote. But Tarzan was my hero. Also Tarzan had movies that I could watch.

I thought Clash of the Titans (the remake) was OK. But I enjoyed the original more. Judi Bowker, the heroine of the original, was absolutely lovely.

So I might see John Carter or the follow up to Clash of the Titans. Or I might see Safe House, because I usually enjoy any action movie with Denzel Washington.


Hey, that brings back memories. I devoured all of Edgar Rice Burroughs' books when I was young. Talking about Tarzan movies, did you ever see the earliest ones? Jane was nude more often than not .. until Hollywood brought in the code!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-07-12  10:34am - 4690 days #43
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm going to put this out but is it possible that the reasn why I and many others like the old Playboys is that all the models were natural and photoshopping didn't exist yet? I have no interest in looking at photos of women who look like they were created by a computer. I want to see the beauty of the imperfect body.


My sentiments exactly, Pat! I love natural which means imperfect!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-07-12  10:31am - 4690 days #42
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I don't know Mez - this quote disturbs me - Are you spending too much time sleeping?


Relax, jberryl, it's only a figure of speech! I do spend a lot of time here, though!!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-05-12  11:58am - 4692 days #36
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm going to put this out but is it possible that the reasn why I and many others like the old Playboys is that all the models were natural and photoshopping didn't exist yet? I have no interest in looking at photos of women who look like they were created by a computer. I want to see the beauty of the imperfect body.


In that case I wish I had viewed the old Playboy Magazines, Pat. Natural is how I like the models as well. This must have changed over the years because ... see my reply to CT!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-05-12  11:10am - 4692 days #34
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Messmer, I too woooould love to see porn like this return.

Playboy while tame by any standards of today, had a way of keeping a mans eye on her. Especially the early days of cable playboy when stripping was the norm.

Hustler and Penthouse dabbled in the seduction racket but it has gone by the way side.

I have found few and and far tidbits, that show clothed to nude. But I keep about 100 or so classics like these.

I hope to see some day it return


Hi CT, I never had Playboy in the early days of Cable, Canadian Cable Companies simply did not provide contents like that. Now they do! Wish I could have seen the stripping!

One thing I do hold against Playboy though is the fact that their ideal model had to look like a Barbie doll with big breasts, which in my opinion led to the abundance of enhanceds we see nowadays. I had the Playboy channel recently and unsubscribed within a month because there were simply too many bolt-ons as well as too much make-up when it came to the majority of the models.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-05-12  10:48am - 4692 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Now how about forking out for a month's membership to that one site you refuse to pay for, but which appeals? Quality over quantity any day. Sometimes it pays to pay.


I'm thinking about it, Squirrel. I'm thinking about it! I still wish our friend's DVD site hadn't gone under .. he was the best when it came to niche content.

Talking about niche content, I wish there were a site listed at TBP that imitated "Southern Charms" but where you wouldn't have to subscribe to the, mostly mature, models individually but got a whole bunch of them for a certain subscription fee.

I remember the site well and with great fondness from the olden days, when ISPs still provided the usenet to their subscribers, because it consisted mostly of true amateur wives, girlfriends, unattached women next door, stripping and they mostly wore "natural wear" rather than the glammed up stuff one sees so often nowadays.

I know, I know it was wrong of me to download from the usenet, Khan, but I've been faithful to paysites ever since!

Rallying cry: Back to NATURAL! No more enhanceds, no more tattoos, no more piercings, no more glamor! Just the girl/woman next door in all her natural glory. If breasts sag, let them. I a belly develops a bit of a handle, let it! If the thighs get a bit heavy, let them.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-05-12  10:22am - 4692 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Just a quick addition: I, too, am impressed with the civility and friendliness in this forum, that's why I spend half of my waking hours here.

And, come to think of it, my time spent at the porn sites that I subscribe to isn't actually all that long. With most of them I'm done within minutes (ignoring the download time of a scene or set).

"Porn Users" is my addiction and will remain my addiction as long as the members stay as tolerant as they are now and as long as TBP keeps the site going!

If I didn't see all the by now familiar and appreciated regulars and their posts on a daily basis I would really be lost because I look at every one as a friend and a welcome visitor to my home!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-05-12  10:09am - 4692 days #30
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


That reminds me, Messmer ....
I have boxes of vintage Playboy Mags stored in the attic...
some dating back to the 60's and (if not stolen) the fifties.
I'm sure there's ample eye candy befitting your taste somewhere embedded in all those copies. I know it's a stretch, but if you think you'd like to have some or all of them and know of a practical shipping method, then you're welcome to them, my friend.
Hell, probably wishful thinking, but they may bring more than the freight costs by selling them on EBay or Craigs List. Why haven't I done that? Too lazy and not up to the task, I'd say.
If I knew exactly what to look for, I'd leaf through the whole batch and just tear out the pages that I think you'd like.

As far as my attachment to the Mags go, well I'm having to move soon and I won't have the space to keep them.

dumb perhaps .... but the idea jus' whizzed by me while reading Cyber's post.

Oh, if you're tuning in Mister Khan, your keen sense of observation hopefully will relent to this as not being a ploy to sell or dispose of my wares over the internet .... jus' a single proposal dedicating my appreciation and valued association to a fellow PU brother.


Thank you, graymane, you are being very kind and generous. I couldn't accept your offer though because I don't think my wife would be impressed with a box of Playboys ending up at my door. She tolerates my porn habit but that would be too much, even though I don't even look at Playboy as porn anymore!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  07:18pm - 4692 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I was going to say the same thing as Dr Denner. Cold turkey for about four weeks minimum should do it.

We're all becoming too blase about the fantastic amount of cheap quality porn out there. Maybe there are one or two niches each of us may like, but not get from run of the mill porn sites. But if you're a porn lover, there is a lot to be happy about, at least we certainly should be happy.

We only need to enjoy 0.5 per cent of the porn that is out there to be permanently engaged in watching porn every hour for every day for the rest of our lives (no matter how long we live), and frankly for me, that is too much time watching porn.

Sometimes hobbies have to be left alone for a while, for the love to return. Messmer you have explained your situation, but if you have a computer, find a different hobby for a while. You may not be able to get out, but access to a computer and tv are two things you do have.


Thank you, squirrel, my friend. I agree with you in principle but here is my problem again:

Even in the very beginning of watching porn there were many picture sets (no decent video at that time) that left me cold.

Our fetishes and favorite niches develop in our youth and something evokes an erotic response in us if we are being reminded of it.

In my youth women went around fully dressed and this is what I miss in today's porn, that they don't start off like that and then gradually reveal all, rather than indulging in the modern habit of diving right in by wearing a dress, thong and a pair of shoes only and taking that off within the first few frames or pictures.

I keep talking about possibly having a lingerie fetish or panty fetish or a love of mature women fetish, but it isn't really .. it's more a longing to see women as they used to dress fifty years ago and, of course, the period lingerie looks more natural on them than it would on a teenie.

And with each year that passes there is less and less of a chance of finding the right material as new generations develop new fetishes and things that turn them on.

Who would have ever thought, only ten years ago, that there would be such a thing as a smoking fetish?

Who would have thought thirty years ago that "hairy" would become a fetish, as well as a turn-off to many?

Do I spend too much time with porn? Undoubtedly, but I really don't believe that a prolonged absence from it would give me back the materials (nylon, rayon, silk, satin) or the attire (stockings w / nylons and garter belt, full backed panties, slips, bras) .. especially bras!!

Does anyone wear a bra these days?

Do you see my point, my friend. As long as I can still look at a set of pictures and get aroused by beautiful women in their intimate apparel, then it is not ennui or over indulgence that makes me talk about being bored, it is the feeling of having been passed by, of never being able to get back what I really crave or if I do get it it is in drips and drabs, as happened with the subscriptions I gave up on in discouragement.

Sorry about the rant .. and you were quite correct in your observation that pre-occupation with any hobby, to the exclusion of just about anything else, can lead to boredom.

Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  06:23pm - 4692 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


M., my good friend!

Fashions do go in cycles so it is likely to come around again.

In the mean time try:

Pin-UpWow

Retro Queens

pinupglamour.com

Perhaps most promising of all:

donovansdarlings.com

It isn't 100% there, but it should restore your faith that some women still enjoy dressing in more traditional sexy clothing.

Cap'n.


Thank you for those valuable hints, Cap'n. I shall tour the sites tomorrow!

As to fashion going in cycles: where are the crinoline, the bustle, the whale bone corset, the wasp waist, those ugly, ugly flapper fashions etc.?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  02:25pm - 4693 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Strange how so many of you guys agreed with my preferred position and yet, as Elephant pointed out, it's relatively hard to find in the average picture set.

BTW, three cheers for your site, Ed. I just took a tour of AMOC and picture six of Sabrielle's 2nd Audience Strip is darn near perfect. Certainly closest to my taste!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  10:04am - 4693 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Full body frontal, standing! Seems a bit unexciting but I like it.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  09:59am - 4693 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I agree with your recommended treatment but sadly I don't think it will help except in the short term. The type of porn that messmer is looking for is disapearing and may never comeback or it may take a long time in returning.

Even I have a lot of issues with most of what passes for good porn these days and I like gonzo and HC porn. Taking a break helps you to recharge your porn batteries but the stuff you want is still not there when you comeback.


I agree with you completely, Pat! See my response to my dear friend, Dr. Denner!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-04-12  09:57am - 4693 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


From Dr. Denners Clinic


Dear Mr. Messmer

Normally this clinic do not take cases online � but in your situation, I'll make an exception.

Our immediate diagnose based on your first description is that you - alas - have caught a somewhat severe case of general porn fatigue.
A disease well known among veteran porn users around the world. And again - alas - it's like an epidemic. Apart from the fatigue we at the clinic also believe that the suppliers of the drug are getting lazy, greedy and seem more and more to lack fantasy.

The best cure we can recommend is a short or longer period of "Cold turkey". It helped this doctor and a lot of other porn addicts.

It's - another alas - the best advise we can give at this moment.

Get well soon.

Dr. Denner




Dear Doctor, thank you for your advice. I actually agree with you that porn fatigue can play a part in finding most updates boring because it has happened to me in the past, but, in my case, Pat is closer to the truth.

Times have changed and with it the material being offered to the public. Because most Porn Users are much younger than I there won't be many that clamor for photos or videos that, to them, are vintage.

I was under the impression, for the longest time, that women's desire to wear sexy lingerie, and men's desire to watch their women wearing it, would be eternal, but the porn industry and the remarks of some younger women in connection with the subject, plus the eager consumption of the "new" porn by the majority have proved me wrong.

Sincerely,

m.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  07:50pm - 4693 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


How about corporate sponsorship? Tattoos on women like the logos on NASCAR race cars. "Model X - brought to you by Budweiser"


Or a tattoo on Audrey Hollander: "brought to you by Otto Bauer." Naw, that would be just plain wrong! And sexist! Which is something that doesn't exist in the Porn world, I'm sure!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  07:30pm - 4693 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


A thought-provoking thread, Sir messmer.
If the old adage is true and works for us .....
"What goes around, comes around." then we may choose to interpret that, and another old saying: "the old becoming new again" to mean (with luck) that the porno-entrepreneurials will find good reason to again incorporate some of the grand old porn that got us so immersed in this stuff in the first place.

On your behalf, however, what with all the sweat an' tears you've surrendered searching for what's out there that you're longing for but eludes you, it is my fervent wish that within our remaining voyueristically productive lives... that prophesy becomes reality and brings it back around to our liking.


I am afraid it won't be within my life time, old friend! Women would have to become willing again to feel a little bit uncomfortable in attire that consists of nylons, garter belts, slips, nylon panties etc. for the sake of their men, and I know in my heart that this one, as well as the generations to follow, will prefer the comfortable casual wear and cotton they got accustomed to.

And a whole new generation of males will have developed a casual wear and cotton fetish and will clamor for that rather than what we are dreaming (drooling) about!

Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  07:23pm - 4693 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ergo Proxy:


Yeah, maybe it's only for fabric enthusiasts (like me ). Maybe they come up with a different concept in the future.


I am a fabric enthusiast myself: satin, nylon, silk, yum. Any model clad like that is a sure hit with me .. but .. see my other post. They HAVE to divest themselves of that fine fabric. It they did that would be the site for me!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  07:19pm - 4693 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ergo Proxy:


I guess Onlytease and their derivatives are no option because they lack the hardcore content?


Sadly, you are right, Ergo Proxy! I expect a set to go past the tease to fully nude, or at least have it show all the important parts!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  07:16pm - 4693 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


What do other users think of photos of a model shot in such a way that they seem to be from the perspective of a tiny person looking up at her? You know, Tom Thumb.

In The Crack regularly features these kinds of shots, but a few other sites also have them at times. ATK Galleria comes to mind.

It's true that you often get a good view of the crotch area, though above that it's just a murky cloud that resembles the model's face.

Personally, I don't care much for them. It's no big deal to me, but sometimes I just pitch them into the dust bin.

Yet they must be appealing to at least some folks.


They are called "upskirt" shots and I like the odd one now and then. It all depends if they take up a big part of the picture set or if there's only a handful of them. I guess it brings out the boy in us because we all know that it's naughty to look up a girl's skirt.

When it comes to videos I like that angle as the girl totters along in her 5" heels with short skirt flopping and panties flirting. Again, as long as it doesn't take up most of the video. A glimpse like that is very appealing to me.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  10:58am - 4694 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't know if this is a good sign but I believe that the demise of Megauplaod is going to have a major positive impact on the porn industry because the guys that were stealing content no longer have a platform to upload it so why steal it.


Trouble is it won't have a positive impact on what I am looking for, Pat. This IS a new age with new tastes and I can't see how we could possibly return to what I like if millions of young pervs are insistent on seeing flesh from the beginning of a picture set or DVD. I really, really miss that "tease factor" of a model stripping gradually out of more than just a dress/jeans and thong.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  10:53am - 4694 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Yes, surely some enlightened Webmanager is going to properly support both of our niche requirements soon!

Cap'n.


Your faith is stronger than mine, Cap'n!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-12  09:00am - 4694 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

I just got finished deleting the bookmarks, complete with passwords and user names to three different sites, because I was actually getting agitated about daily updates that left me absolutely cold.

It was always the same routine: click on the site with anticipation, look at the samples of today's update, give 'em a low score and then sign out in frustration. I still had a couple of weeks to go on two of them, and over a month on the third.

I think my days of subscribing to the same handful of sites over and over are finally a thing of the past. They've gone from erotic to blah!

At least for me, because I do not blame the sites themselves. Times have changed and, along with the times, so have tastes.

End of rant, no response required. I simply had to get it off my chest.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-02-12  04:11pm - 4695 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		^Good rant, Drooler. I agree.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-29-12  09:47am - 4697 days #41
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Messmer you are sure to have heard of this but there are some new sites from Mature Mega pass. Mature Magazine and Mature Retro are two of them. Unfortunately they appear to be hardcore, but there might be something of interest in there especially on Mature Retro.


Thanks, Squirrel. I hadn't actually heard of the new sites but am still too cheap to pay Mature.nl.'s admission prices. Too bad, Mature Retro would have appealed to me. BTW, I don't mind hardcore, I just don't like it in Picture Sites!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-25-12  06:14pm - 4700 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I wouldn't feel bad about it, because your votes for other girls are likely cancelled out by the people who give ones and twos to anyone below a C cup. You like what you like, and there no need to apologize for it.


Thanks, hodayathink, you guys have re-assured me and I've handed out a fistful of ones and twos today without a twinge of remorse!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-25-12  10:22am - 4701 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Seems that fake is the "new real" for some. It doesn't have to be for those who don't like it. I don't like false titties either. Go ahead and vote as you wish. I mean, if they're guilt free about pushing the silicone monsters at you (cue scene from Woody Allen's Everything You Always Wanted ...), be just as guilt free about screaming "NO!" with your 1's and 2's.


Thanks, Drooler, that's exactly what I'll keep doing. "I am mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!"
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-25-12  10:20am - 4701 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I can honestly say I have steered well clear of those fake breast sites. Never signed up to Brazzers, Reality Kings or Naughty America, or even DDF. I also steer well clear of those with pre checked cross sells and regional discrimination. I vote with my pocket.


Bangbros.and Reality KIngs weren't too bad at one time but Bangbros. is really starting to get out of hand. I can't comment on DDF except that I dislike them for a different reason: way too much make-up on the models' faces.

As to voting with my pocket, I have a problem. As you may have guessed by now my main preference is mature women over forty and it is there that the percentage of enhanced breasts must have increased to about 80% on most sites .. I am running out of choices.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-25-12  10:14am - 4701 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I started allowing members to vote on updates some years ago, but quickly found that the results were not much help to me. When I last did a big revamp of StripGameCentral I added the facility for members' commenting directly on each update instead. That gives me MUCH better feedback - however persuading members to take a few moments to write a comment seems to be impossible. I can't even get 1% of members to comment on even one update!

I tend to assume that people are more likely to complain than praise (as is the case on the rest of the Internet) so I have to assume that my photosets and videos must be at least acceptable to my members?


Ed, could you judge by the number of videos or picture sets that were downloaded which are popular and which aren't?

I wonder if that could be the reason why the fake business is booming, because the downloads prove that most (especially the young males) don't mind?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-25-12  10:07am - 4701 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


A 24-year-old co-worker once told me, "I don't care how they got big, I just like 'em big!" So they'll keep paying for whatever crap is put out (cough Brazzers cough), and the sites will keep churning it out.


That's exactly the sentiment I've run across time after time, RB. As long as they are big who cares? You can tell when the juvenile mind is at work when you go to sites that feature erotic stories. Half of them seem to be about body modification .. and how beautiful a woman now feels since she got fake breasts. I don't think anyone over thirty would write something like that.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-12  02:07pm - 4702 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Unfortunately, as long as people keep signing up and the money is rolling in, I'm pretty sure that most sites will figure that that's "comment enough".


Well, if they look at it that way, my conscience won't bother me any longer, RB, and I'll keep giving my ones and twos to bolt-ons!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-12  01:38pm - 4702 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

I wish that every site that allows you to rate their material would also give you a chance to comment.

I always feel guilty if a model's face is gorgeous, the photographer/videographer has done a technically fine job, yet I end up giving an update an extremely low score because the porn star's breasts have been enhanced. I find the sight of them so disgusting that I cannot be fair to the site and all those involved in the production by rating more objectively.

With a comment I could at least make it clear to all, hey it's not entirely your fault, it's just that you are not meeting my needs and taste with your latest update.

Gangbros. is a classic example of allowing scoring without a provision for comments, which brought on this post. I have been giving ones and twos to most of their scenes lately because all I see is enhanced breasts.

I know I am not being fair and it bugs me but how else can I express my personal likes and dislikes to a site?

As I said, I wish they gave me a chance to comment on what's bugging me. It might be easier on all.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-12  10:42am - 4708 days #29
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Messmer wrote: "The U.S. is still a super power and the thought that you might end up with some religious extreme right-winger at the helm of Government really frightens me."

Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I thought we already tried that with George W. Bush.


Yes, and he frightened me, too. And rightly so, as Iraq proved so effectively!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-12  01:37pm - 4709 days #23
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


I usually try not to think in black and white terms when it comes to religion and politics. I try to judge others the way I would want them to judge me - not by what they believe or what they do in the bedroom but by how they behave towards others. Some people in life can be asshats, ones belief system notwithstanding. I dislike these individuals not because of what they believe or don't believe but because of what they do.

Stalin was an asshat. Not because he was an atheist but because he was an amoral sociopath. Someone like Ted Haggard was an asshat, not because of his Christian beliefs but because he was a hypocrite.


I go along with that statement!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-12  10:22am - 4709 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


And I don't think you give enough credit to the near-theocratic religiosity of a huge number of Americans.


I do, and it scares me. The U.S. is still a super power and the thought that you might end up with some religious extreme right-winger at the helm of Government really frightens me. I was talking about the world in general. Look at how many people Stalin alone killed under state sponsored atheism.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-12  04:04pm - 4710 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Vegas Ken:


Hey everyone!

I just wanted to give you a quick heads up that we are going to be giving away $200 in prize money in this weeks newsletter contest. There will be one grand prize winner of $100 and two runner up winners of $50.

The contest is super easy to enter, so if you are not revieving and reading the newsletter yet, please sign up right away! If you snooze you will have to wait till the next one

Thanks for using our site!

Vegas Ken


Hi, Ken. I am a subscriber, I did receive the newsletters in the past and I have a check mark in my profile yet I did not get one this time around. No, it's not in my Spam folder either! Please send me another one.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-12  12:17pm - 4710 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


If you really want to protect children may I suggest keeping them away from religion. What else lets otherwise seemingly rational people do what amounts to physical and emotional abuse to children? Try justifying things like circumcision, confession, or faith healing outside the authoritarian confines of religion and you'd be rightly considered a criminal suspect or at the very least a serious nutcase.

Sorry, I still get angry every time I think of the phrase "Born and raised ______," as if religion is something that can only be acquired by simply being born and raised that was--a poor excuse for terrible parenting.


Since I despise religion because it tends to destroy spirituality I won't argue about its ill effects on some but I think you don't give enough credit to agnostic or atheist humanity which is in ascendancy in the West, with the possible exception of the U.S. (just going by the Republican candidates who seem to do their utmost to woo the extreme religious right)!

Someone pointed out that people don't need religion to be good, and they were right, but the reverse is also true, people don't need religion to be evil.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-15-12  06:24pm - 4710 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		^ Yes, BubbaGump, but there can even be an argument made in favor of the nasty, over the top and "degrading" stuff because for some who live that life style this is the spice of life.

Ask anyone seriously involved in BDSM (no, I'm not one of them) and they would tell you that the act of degrading is fun (if they are the dominant partner) or that being degraded is fun (if they are the submissive in the relationship).

Who knows what lurks in anyone's background that makes them want to live their lives in a way that the rest of society would find disgusting. And if it is a life style that is chosen willingly, with no one getting hurt, then no one should have the right to interfere.

Our former Prime Minister Trudeau had it right when he said: "The State has no business in the bedrooms of a nation!"
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-15-12  04:23pm - 4710 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I don't dispute that many religious people do a lot of good, but they don't need to be religious to do good, there's nothing stopping them doing good anyway. I can't help feeling that someone who only does good under duress (out of fear of what will happen to them if they are not good) is really a good person.

As to religion, there are enough monsters in this world without creating imaginary ones too.


Well, with many, if not most, the desire to do good does not come from fear but from love. If God loves me unconditionally that will motivate me to do the same for others. But now we are on dangerous ground .. arguing or even talking about religion tends to be very divisive and gets many hot under the collar. So let's leave it there.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-15-12  11:09am - 4711 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I don't see how the pastor in that debate can rationally claim the moral high ground. He uses 'belief' in a made up entity to control people. That seems blatantly immoral to me. At least the performers are doing it through choice, whereas the pastor uses fear to make his members do what he wants them to.

Does anyone else find it scary that people like that are still allowed to persist?


Even though I heartily dislike the puritanism behind so much of religion I would not accuse any pastor of promoting a belief system solely for control of others. It happens, of course, but I think the vast majority really believe in their God and are not in it for control but because they want to serve God somehow, mostly by loving their neighbor as they love themselves.

Look at the Salvation Army and how much good they have done over the years. Most of our universities and hospitals have their roots in Christianity as well.

The problem came with people like Calvin and Knox, as only two examples of how NOT to serve God, who felt that having fun was unchristian and passed their warped theology on to others with similar narrow minds.

I have never considered human sexuality to be something to be shunned or condemned, and my belief system (not exactly orthodox Christianity) can happily co-exist with Porn if it is something that is done voluntarily and willingly.

I get a hell of a lot more outraged when I see dead children in the streets, or even when I look at the blatant hypocrisy of Politicians who preach family values yet manage to practice in secret the very things they publicly condemn.

But it is not only the religious that pose a threat. We have a secular (albeit right-wing) Government and at this moment we face a huge threat to our privacy and freedom in Canada with a Bill coming up that would allow Police to obtain all the information from your ISP as to your browsing habits, which web sites you subscribe to, the real name behind your handle, the contents of your emails etc. WITHOUT a warrant.

This is done in the name of protecting children from sexual predators.

There need not be reasonable suspicion .. any cop could simply decide to go to my ISP and ask for my most private details because he is curious about what I am up to. This by a secular Government and not by a religious organization. Scary times!

I wonder if the average Canadian will finally stand up for freedom and say to his Government: "You can't do this, my right to privacy is way too important for me to allow you to do away with it. You have other means to catch pedophiles, you do it every day and if there are suspicions, then get a warrant first.

Sorry, I got carried away!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-14-12  10:52am - 4712 days #28
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I think it might be because I almost never watch videos full-screen. When there are displayed in a video which matches the resolution of the video, it makes no difference, a pixel is still a pixel, so no graininess.


Ah, that's where the difference of opinion comes in, Ed. I almost never watch a video windowed. A) Because my eyes are starting to fail me and B) because I bought a fairly large, wide screen, LCD monitor and I'm going to make full use of it! Same thing happened to me when it comes to watching TV. It's been a long time since I watched any non-HD 4:3 channel. Just can't enjoy it if I can't count every pore on someone's face. I've waited long enough for a good picture and am not willing to waste one second on an inferior one. TV or Internet!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-12-12  06:58pm - 4713 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I held on to "Deep Throat" w/ Linda Lovelace and a video by Sharon Mitchell for quite a while because of their rarity but the more I upgraded my hardware the worse they started to look.

I guess it all depends on your personality .. either you are nostalgic or you are not. They are gone from my HD now but I do confess that I felt a twinge of regret when I hit that delete button, even though I confessed to not being nostalgic. Maybe a couple of years from now someone will discover a way to make them look great again .. I only hope I will still be around by then!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-12-12  10:27am - 4714 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by elephant:


Blimey Messmer, wish I was that ruthless when it comes to chucking out time, I struggle like Cybertoad to decide if I need it cause it brought such good memories when first discovered, but yeah on widescreen some of the movies look so bad these days you begin to wonder how you were ever pleased back then with the quality, u just didn't have these huge hi-def files so I guess its the case of not knowing any different.


Actually, Elephant, the thing is that at the time the videos and pictures didn't look all that bad because the monitors were smaller and the default resolution was something like 800x600.

But watching them now on a much bigger flat screen with a 1680x1050p resolution (in my case) is a pain. To me it's almost desecration to watch a former favorite that is now blurred and washed out looking, it doesn't do justice to the movie or picture set or me! That's why the ruthlessness. Only nostalgia might make me keep something that is now grossly outdated and I don't have any! I tend to live in the present ... at least as far as porn is concerned.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-08-12  12:44pm - 4718 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^In that case you should delete it. I just hope that you don't wind up like me and rearadmiral and regeet it later on.


No chance of that, Pat. My short term memory is shot! Come next week I won't remember what I deleted!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-08-12  09:45am - 4718 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


My experience with something like this was that I tossed out some old VHS tapes simply because storing them was such a pain in the ass. I've regretted that ever since. I spent a long time trying to rebuild that 'historical' part of my collection. I realize harddrive prices are a bit high now, but they are still worth it. My advice is to store the stuff so you can go back and enjoy it when you want to.


But that's just the problem, rearadmiral, I can't enjoy anything that is not in top, up-to-date quality. I have no favorite scenes or photo sets if they don't look good on my monitor. I recently got rid of material that I marked FV (for favorite) and "do not delete" only three years ago.Too anal and not nostalgic enough, I guess!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-06-12  10:17am - 4720 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I was didling, no not diddling I mean diddling around.
And realized I have some old porn I mean stuff from near 10 years ago bogging up my PC. It was great stuff it was also
allot of 320x480 stuff too. No HD and on my wide screen looks horrible.

So whats a Guy or Gal to do with old porn?

There is no, donation at Salvation Army for my old porn.
Or Shelter where old porn goes when it outta date.

I can not give it my pals on here cause thats illegal.

So ther then deleting it what should I, or what do you do with used porn that is no longer good but once was?

Do you keep it around for a good memory ?

Just wondered.



I am ruthless when it comes to quality, Cybertoad. I recently weeded out all picture sets that were at 800x600px and below, as well as all videos that were less than 640x480p and I didn't even check to see if some favorites were among them.

They stop being my favorites if the quality isn't up to new standards and everything looks blurred and washed out in full screen.

I am sure a lot of excellent stuff went down the drain but if I can't have my picture (video or photo) crystal clear I don't want it. Probably the time will come soon when I will delete anything that isn't at least 720p HD!

BTW, same thing happened to me with Cable. I no longer watch any of the non-HD channels except the Weather Channel!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-01-12  02:35pm - 4725 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


Very true. It's not so much the acting but the level of Vocalization, however. I turn the volume to mute so the neighbors won't think my cat got trapped in the drier and perhaps call the fire department.


I'm a total failure, no one ever squealed like that for me!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-30-12  10:31am - 4727 days #34
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I hope for your sake that you aren't disapointed if you decide to join any of their sites. I certainly won't give them another chance until I have a guarantee that you can download the entire library.

P.S:I'm not saying that you can't download some of the content but that you can't download the entire content. The other problem is that there is no way of knowing which is available for download and which isn't prior to joining and there is no mention anywhere on their sites that they don't allow the complete ownload of their library.


I agree with you wholeheartedly, Pat. I must have sampled every one of the Score group's sites during the past few years and liked them a lot. But I would not go back now. Not until they change back.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-27-12  10:03am - 4730 days #84
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Secretease com:


I used to think that until I recently carried out some polls. Stockings with garters/suspenders won everytime by a long way. I have shoots coming up so will be bringing them back


Hooray! Long may you live!!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-26-12  02:21pm - 4731 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I am very impressed with the accomplishments of the U.S. Navy Seals. I think that's how many of the conflicts of the future will be fought, by drones and by small units of highly trained commandos.

Three cheers to the Seals for their brilliant rescue of two civilians!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-26-12  02:11pm - 4731 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		And also a warm welcome back to my friend, the Raging Buddhist! You've been missed .. and that's not just talk, that comes from the heart!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

801-850 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 16 Page 17 18 23 28 33 38 43 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.71 seconds.