Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

201-250 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 13 20 27 34 41 51 52 Next Page >

08-15-13  10:47pm - 4146 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I think now its Digital Desire, Messmer.


Thanks, CT!

08-15-13  10:47pm - 4146 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Marphel:


Excellent thread Denner, I agree with you 100%.

I want to see more posing, stripping, and teasing in videos with the camera focused on the FEMALE performer(s). I subscribe to porn sites for one reason: to see beautiful women in erotic/sensual performances.

But, it's becoming impossible to find that these days. Besides the "suck, fuck, and close-ups" formula so many porn sites cling to, there is way too much attention paid to the male performers. Too many picture sets and videos are ruined by undue attention given to the males. I hate the repeated close-ups of male faces, male ass cracks, hairy legs, hands constantly grabbing pawing and blocking your view of the female.

My interest in porn begins and ends with beautiful women. I wish there were more porn sites who share that interest.


AMEN, BROTHER!

08-15-13  02:11pm - 4147 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^ What's the full name of ddgirls, ct? Is there anything of the "innocent, sexy, soft" left in the present site? Thanks.

08-15-13  12:28pm - 4147 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Why, oh why is it so rare (still) to watch vids without a little strip or at least posing before the act/acts.
Is the majority of porn-fans into just suck, fuck and close-ups?
Way too few producers tend to the foreplay, the showing of the female body as mentioned above.....too many scenes are a little fully clothes cuddling on a sofa or bed - then focusing on the act.......
Let's have more posing/strip - and I don't mind if it's half of the vid........


Thank you for posting this, Denner. This is exactly the way I feel. Trouble is porn is headed the other way. There is one forum participant right here who likes to edit all the "unnecessary stuff" from a scene and just keep what's "important!" iow, the sex part only and I am sure he is not the only one, my friend. Times have changed.

This is exactly the reason why I have not been interested in porn for months. Preludes to sex, or teasing, or postludes are no longer wanted by the majority and cowardly (or financially scared) webmasters are giving in to the "all I want is the good stuff" crowd for fear of going down the tubes (no pun intended.)

I wish there were such a thing as "chick porn" where things would be less crass and tasteless. I like sex scenes as much as the next guy but in order for me to enjoy them there has to be more to it than a blow job starting with the first frame of the video.

Talking about frightened webmasters. One who runs one of my formerly favorite solo sites has just announced that his subscribers can expect b/g picture sets and movies in the future.

Yipee .. just what I didn't want to see. The b/g crowd is driving me crazy.

What the hell is wrong with a beautiful woman doing a solo and sticking to that format (as a webmaster/owner) if that's how you started. There is more than enough b/g content already in thousands of other sites. Why ruin the few softcore/midcore sites that were left? I look at hardcore but mourn the passing of the pure (with leisurely stripping) solo sites. Edited on Aug 15, 2013, 10:41pm

07-18-13  12:23pm - 4175 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
"Unless you like overweight, pockmarked, age spot ridden women, avoid mature.nl at all costs." Raging Buddhist

I have always had a soft spot for the above! I don't know what it is, there are certainly sexier models around, yet I don't find them half as erotic as a really mature woman.

Maybe it is because they have the courage to expose themselves to certain ridicule by the younger crowd, maybe it is because they are so next-door-ish and amateurish looking that it almost feels indecent to be the voyeur to their exhibitionist .. maybe because they are all younger than I?

Who knows?

I just know that I always went for the "Lusty Grannies" rather than the glam types. Even though I do appreciate the latter.

07-15-13  10:48am - 4178 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by LPee23:


Yeah, as for how well it is represented among porn surfers on the net, no one really knows. I've heard numbers as low as 1 in 1,000 and as wildly high as 50%. I don't think anyone is really counting, but I'd guess it's 1 in 100.
pornmd.com/sex-search is a site were they actually report running lists of the top 10 porn search terms by country. Piss actually made the top 10 list in 2 countries - #10 in Austria and #6 is Algeria (???). I get the Eastern European thing, but Algeria was kind of random.
You may be right about the squirting stuff, but there is definitely a lot of straight up watersports porn being made right here in the US. Consider the ATK sites, based in CA. They have been one of the largest producers of watersports porn for years, and continue to be. ALS is another one, based in MD.


I think there is a general misunderstanding of what "watersports" is all about! ATK and other NA sites mis-define it as a model doing a bit of peeing, which explains the "water" but not the "sports" part.

Real watersports involves at least TWO people (and they are not just urinating side by side) and those sites are exceedingly rare, especially in Canada and the U.S. Kink.com is the only one that comes to my mind.

07-11-13  12:14pm - 4182 days #633
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Khan, could you please list a new site called CzechCougars.com. Thank you.

07-11-13  12:08pm - 4182 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Reminds me of Patton Oswalt's "Clean Filth" routine on saying something dirty in a G-rated form for TV and in the process making it a lot more horrifying.

"I'm going to fill your hoo-ha with my goof juice!"


Craig Ferguson does similar messing around with the censors on his late, late show. Not to the same extent as Patton Oswalt but enough to make CBS nervous ... which is a good thing.

07-11-13  12:04pm - 4182 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Thanks, mess .......now I won't be embarrassed by ignorance when somebody brings up "center" when he's detailing foreplay with a sex partner.

One of my wives also similarly used to "shatter into a million pieces."
Not from orgasm, but on matters like refusing to entertain her mother on her visits.


LOL. Wives tend to shatter into a million pieces for all kinds of reasons, don't they? Especially during menopause!

07-10-13  10:14am - 4183 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


It reminds me, once again, that when I look out into a crowd of people, however unnoticeable it might seem to be, there are some really loopy ones who are actually in plain sight.


And the Internet, through its anonymity, confirms our cynicism when it comes to many of our fellow citizens. This is how they are behind their daily polite facades. Just plain "loopy," as you wrote.

07-10-13  10:08am - 4183 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FuzzyBunny:


I'm not 100% sure, but I think the sheer quantity of ladies available means you'll find plenty like you describe.


Thank you, FB. Your answer is appreciated.

07-09-13  03:22pm - 4184 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by biker:


I had a good laugh when he accused jberry of an agenda, when he vomited his own all over the place. I thought of replying to him, but noticed the disabled. I also remembered not to feed trolls.


You are right, I shouldn't feed trolls. Well, I'm glad this one is gone, maybe I'll have more self-control when it comes to the next one.

07-09-13  11:02am - 4184 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


I have learned that a vagina is a woman's "center" or "heat," that her labia are "folds" and that during an orgasm she "shatters in(to) a million pieces! And now you know!

07-09-13  10:46am - 4184 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by sukmybigballz:


excuse me? ur finding my posts un cordial? ur kidding...?
im outta here...if ur offended by my very polite and factual posts then ur agenda needs to be re routed elsewhere not here.
whacked out liberals never seem to get it..that they are the problem not the solution..only their views are tolerated and they are the only ones who can act up and act out and cry foul when someone other opposing view hits them with facts and then turns the situation into something else...
u must be from the 1960's...hope so...its only a matter of 10 more yrs or so and all this whacked out liberal crap will be in the cemetery where it needs to rest.
make it a great day


You have no idea on how out of place you are here. Yours is one of two nasty posts I have seen in this forum since 2007 so I won't be unhappy if you decide this place isn't for you.

PS. Just noticed that the above user was disabled! Happy, happy, happy!

07-09-13  10:43am - 4184 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by sukmybigballz:


THAT IS WISHFUL THINKING, THE TREND OF UNCUT IS NEARING AN END.
IN SFO, WHERE THE FAR LEFT GAY WHACKOS HAVE BEEN PUSHING THIS AGENDA TO HAVE BOYS REMAIN UNCUT AND THAT THERE IS SOME FORCE ON THE PARENTS TO PENALIZE FOR NOT HAVING THEIR SON CIRCUMCISED, THE BACK FIRE HIT. BOYS ARE NOW BEING CUT, AND THE TREND NOW FOR GROWN MEN HOW IN CHARGE OF THEIR COCKS ARE TAKING TO REMOVE THEIR FORESKIN...WHILE THE TREND IS EARLY, ITS BEGUN AND BUDDY THAT IS THE MAJORITY HERE IN THE USA AND EUROPE (AND THAT IS ALL IM REFERRING TO IS THESE TWO CULTURES)


I am from Europe and YOU ARE JOKING! You are exercising a lot of wishful thinking and present that as a fact. MY last word to you and on the subject.

07-09-13  10:40am - 4184 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FuzzyBunny:


Indeed the price is unusually high. But I would argue that -- at least a few years ago -- it was worth it.

There was a period when the site was posting a lot of new hard-core in the age-40-to-60 amateur niche, of a high quality that did not seem to be available anywhere else. I signed up during this period, and I thought the high price was worth it for 1 month of downloading my favorites.

But today it seems like the hard-core is rare, with most of the clips now featuring just solo performances. I'm definitely not paying $50-ish for that -- but if they brought back regular new posts of hard-core, with the same genre of ladies, I'd be back now and then for one-month visits.


Just curious, because I am always begging for it: in these solos are the women fully dressed and strip down to nothing? Do they wear appealing lingerie? That might sway me yet!

07-08-13  11:03am - 4185 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


What'd you do, Pard ....... go Google on me?
I mean, obvious credit stands out as a crown for thou being a bona fide cultured PU Dude, an' all, (but) I'm stopping short of buying into the idea you're into stuff as deep as this guy (Congreve) writes.

But you're right though .....however, according to one of my unused sources, so am I.
Meaning I can be judged at least half right, in that it's a firm quote I failed to use from William Shakespeare.


GB, I felt badly about writing the above because it sounded too arrogantly smug ... I should have put a wink or something in that effort more often so that you would know I was teasing. I even tried to delete the whole post because I normally don't correct anyone, but it was too late. My apologies for sounding like an insufferable prig.

07-08-13  10:57am - 4185 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Our forum is rife with direct and indirect pleads to sites we're purchasing from to make sensible alterations, changes, or whatever other action we feel is overdue to equal the playing field, shooting for our forgotten needs while ideally maintaining a favorable statis quo for sites.
Our reviews are giving these guys invaluable input from a seasoned viewer's perspective ...... a feature too many sites easily take for granted: and others that just don't give a damned.

Our rants are a clear and definitive measure that's of particular importance ... but, unfortunately, doesn't get the response it deserves.

A continuing example on my part are nagging efforts through repeated rants about shabby camera work, ongoing poor video operations, and, above all, 7th grade level at directing and putting together a decent product.

The message and short answer summing all this up is clearly that we're given only a deaf ear and blind eye to what we're crying out for. And as long as the bucks flow and nobody's making waves ..... I guess we'll pay-up and continue taking what we're given.

If this thread brings up similar things bugging you that you'd like to let out ......please post it here for us to study and/or comment on.


I would put the blame for "non-responsive" web masters and sites on the porn consumer as well, gm. If they didn't make money with the crap they present they wouldn't be in business. There are way too many whose taste, as they say, is all in their mouth, and as long as they are in the majority the inadequacies found in many porn sites' offerings will continue. Don't forget, gm, the opinions you find here, in this forum, are written by literate people and don't represent the common view. Most of us, here, are against fake breasts yet every time I express a dislike of those horrible balloons in a site like Video Box I get slammed with negative votes. Same with ATK Natural and Hairy. I think it would be safe to say that a vast majority of PUs in this forum are against hairy legs on a model, yet ATK have decided to concentrate on exactly that from now on. They wouldn't have done that if there wasn't a good number of fetishists who like to look at stubbly legs. Never underestimate the bad taste of the general population. If this sounds elitist, so be it!

07-08-13  10:41am - 4185 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Micha:


I�ve recently been revisiting my collection of still images on several external drives. There are more than I thought, over 1.4 million pictures and that doesn�t count the hundreds of zipped files I�ve found to put on my to do list.
Over the years, nay decades, I�ve noticed there is entirely too much red in porn images and videos. What I�ve recently noticed is that even images and videos that don�t appear to be too red, can be greatly improved by the neutralization of reds, magentas, and yellows.
A few seconds, and one or two clicks, in Photoshop can work wonders in improving still images. Boosting the cyan level to neutralize the red, and tweaking the green to kill magenta and blue to kill yellow, is a quick and simple fix. (Digital color works differently than paint pigment)
Adobe Premiere can vastly improve the look of videos and adjusting vids in the VLC Viewer, (Interface/ Effects and Filters/ Video Effects / Enable, can temporarily change the look for individual viewings.
I have thousands of what I considered to be sub-standard pix and vids that I haven�t gotten around to deleting, which I�ve found now to be quite salvageable.

Ain�t porn Grand?


I never looked at it as pictures having too much red in them, Micha, for me many were too color saturated. It probably amounts to the same thing. I prefer "cool" colors in my pictures as well as on TV. I only found one site that presented "cool" consistently, and that was Abby Winters.

07-08-13  10:31am - 4185 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FuzzyBunny:


Mature.nl seems to feature mostly solo ladies these days.

Of course, most of the ladies have a distinct European look -- and honestly, most of the site's models strike me as unattractive (and that's saying a lot because I'm not that picky when it comes to older ladies). But there are some gems among the bunch, and the quantity of solo scenes is huge.

The site's preview pages should give you a good idea of the type of content.


I've always liked Mature.nl, I even like the "lived-in" look of many of their models but I DO NOT like their price. I have the money but would never pay roughly CA $60.00 to subscribe to a site for one month. I am not cheap and spend more than that on impulse purchases, if I think I get fair value for my money. But $60.00 a month for a Porn site?

07-07-13  03:48pm - 4186 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I miss Bloom County. Bill the Cat, Opus, Milo, Steve, Portnoy, etal.


Boy, I thought this really dated me but then realized you were only 10 years younger than I. I have never heard of any of the above.

07-07-13  10:18am - 4186 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Catherine Kieu's last words before lowering her knife to commit this horrible deed .......
"I warned you, you Sob, that if you wouldn't get yourself circumcised that I'd do it myself."



The Bible even has something to say about this kind of thing;

"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned"


Sorry, ole pal, but you can't blame the Bible for everything:

William Congreve, in The Mourning Bride, 1697:

As you'll answer it, take heed
This Slave commit no Violence upon
Himself. I've been deceiv'd. The Publick Safety
Requires he should be more confin'd; and none,
No not the Princes self, permitted to
Confer with him. I'll quit you to the King.
Vile and ingrate! too late thou shalt repent
The base Injustice thou hast done my Love:
Yes, thou shalt know, spite of thy past Distress,
And all those Ills which thou so long hast mourn'd;
Heav'n has no Rage, like Love to Hatred turn'd,
Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd.

07-06-13  11:23am - 4187 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I am a war child (WW II) and have been a cynic ever since. There are so many crazies just waiting to come out of the woodwork, given the right social conditions.

See Nazi Germany! The civilized country of Schiller, Goethe, Rilke, Schopenhauer, Kant, Beethoven, Bach, Haendel, Hayden hiding tens of thousands of monsters behind a respectable facade of teacher, doctor, judge, architect, plus the more obvious low lives, who saw nothing wrong with persecuting, killing and torturing millions for their ethnicity, or religious and political views.

I am convinced that the same percentage of evil "crazies" can be found in any country .. so fervently pray, if you are so inclined, for stable social and economic conditions in whatever country you happen to live in. That nice, pleasant school teacher next to you could be a potential Himmler, if given a chance.

If you need a modern day example of what can happen once lawlessness takes over just look at Yugoslavia after Tito died, or at present-day Syria.

Sorry! A bit off-topic when it comes to cut-off bits!

07-01-13  10:08am - 4192 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


You can rent or buy movies from Amazon. Obviously, the price for buying a movie is higher than for renting it.

If you do buy the movie, you can have it stored on the cloud at Amazon, or you can have it downloaded to your computer or some other device.

Normally, it is cheaper to buy a DVD copy of a movie, instead of buying a copy to download. It doesn't make sense, to me, but that's usually the way they are priced.

And the DVD usually has better features: Closed-captioned, choice of languages, choice of audio track, sometimes a feature on how the movie was made, etc.

The download copy doesn't have any of those extra features that the DVD might have.


Thanks! Your tip is very helpful, lk2fireone. I gave my DVD Player away to one of my grandsons and simply recorded movies I was interested in on my DVR. It was only after I had emptied one of my externals that the thought occurred to me to start collecting movies again. However, if I have to pay more for a downloaded version of a movie than for a DVD then I would not be interested. That's crazy! Oh well, it was a thought!

06-29-13  02:46pm - 4194 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Randyman:


I don't think no such site(s) exist.


Thanks, Randyman, I somehow didn't think so either but was hoping. I got an extra hard drive sitting empty because all my formerly favorite sites have changed too much, either in favor of bland, or of horrifying (hairy legs!!!!), and I have nothing to subscribe to at the moment. So, filling it with some good movies that I could keep would have been ideal. Oh, well.

06-29-13  11:25am - 4194 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


Is there such a thing? I have deleted so much porn that I now have an empty external Hard Drive and would like to use it to collect ordinary, main stream movies to view them on my TV.

I am talking pay sites, not torrents. I am not interested in pirated movies, just in a pay site that has a good selection of movies that can be downloaded for keeps. I am not interested in renting, so sites like Netflix or Amazon are out.

06-27-13  12:15pm - 4196 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I adore Amber Rayne because she is one of those performers that isn't able to give a bad scene. That said. I don't put her in the same category as Kelly and Audrey because as much as I think that she did some wild things. She always seemed to be in control which I can't say for the other two ladies.


I cannot disagree with a word you say, Pat. That's how I see it, too.

06-25-13  12:41pm - 4198 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Randyman:


I was thinking about joining Anilos but of all the samples I've seen most of the woman had fake breasts and that doesn't do it for me at all. Karups OW was just like you said, full of not-so-older chics with fake breasts. All over 30 was a major disappointment, although they had boat loads of beautiful women, I didn't care for their photography style. Many pictorials that would've been otherwise great were totally ruined by lack of panty and butt shots and the redundancy of the pictorials really aggravated me, nobody needs to see the same pussy shot 10 times, over and over again, in every pictorial.


Good man! We appear to be on the same wavelength! You nailed it when you described today's All Over 30!!!

06-25-13  10:32am - 4198 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
My dream car: Anything that runs and gets me to the grocery store.

06-25-13  10:26am - 4198 days #18
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I think genuine softcore still has enough supporters to be supported. I thought there was a lot around but it's something I don't collect. For me there are some great softcore photos on TeenCoreClub and 21Sextury, but they are hardcore networks. I remember collecting old mags like Mayfair, which had some good softcore material, but the airbrushing was always irritating. Possibly that is what a lot of softcore fans want, something close to that original softcore men's magazine look.


Nope, not me, Squirrel. I hate the air brushed look and I don't like the Mayfair, Playboy, look. And, yes, there are many sites that are basically softcore .. basically because lately b/g has pushed its way in, and they would be tolerable if they were basically EROTIC, SENSUOUS and TEASING. Trouble is they really don't know what people like the Cap'n and I want.

For instance, at one site I had been constantly complaining that the strip sets did not contain enough lingerie .. well, somebody must have listened because they now feature a few sets now and then where the model will wear nylons and garter belt, or a flimsy nightie etc.

Trouble is they START the set with that while WE would like them to start with the woman fully clothed. Lingerie fetishists might be satisfied but those of us who yearn for a slow tease containing erotic lingerie are still left out in the cold. As someone else said: "The excitement is in the journey!"

They seem to have forgotten that in their eagerness to please those who like their money shot (nude, wide open) they took all the anticipation out of their offerings by now featuring a handful of clothed that is followed by hundreds of almost identical nude shots. Edited on Jun 25, 2013, 10:31am

06-24-13  06:55pm - 4199 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Randyman:


I was already a member of Karups OW and All over 30, and am currently a member of Evil Angel which offers a great selection of older woman. Took the tour of some "milf" type sites and they didn't seem to pop for me. I'm mostly into solo models and picture collecting so does anyone have any recommendations?


You like to twist the knife, don't you, Randyman? This is something I have been screaming, sulking, throwing tantrums about for ages!

Karups OW didn't do it for me because their older women looked too young and had fake boobs to boot (in many cases).

All Over 30 was great until a couple of years ago when their models still wore sexy underwear under their every day clothes, but they are now following a philosophy called "minimalism" .. the less clothes before you get nude, the better!

Same with Anilos!

I am not aware of any other solo sites that feature mature women. Let me know if you come across one. Edited on Jun 29, 2013, 02:49pm

06-24-13  06:47pm - 4199 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


It's perfectly acceptable to bitch when the bitching is warranted. Change your name to RagingMessmer and whine away as you see fit!


You made my day, RB. RagingMezz! I like it!

06-24-13  06:37pm - 4199 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I always thought softcore photography was better than it's hardcore cousin. Maybe it's only great for hardcore fans at the moment. I didn't think it was that bad in the softcore area Capn, and obviously porn fans like Messmer are left out in the cold too. I like mainstream hardcore so am catered for magnificently, which is why I'm puzzled about some of the negativity. It would be nice to think fans of some of those uncovered niches outside mainstream, will be catered for eventually.


We were catered to at one time, Squirrel, but all the sites that appealed to us have become "harder" over a period of time which means less teasing and more sex.

The Capn is optimistic that the pendulum will swing back, but I am not so sure since the new target group (roughly 18 - 30) tends to prefer action to tease, and it is they who make up the bulk of the subscribers.

I bet there are porn users already who say: "What the heck is a camisole, or a garter belt! " Or: "Why would anyone wear panties if they cover up that I want to see?" SIGH ..... so how can a good, lengthy, erotic strip ever come back if the present generation goes to bed with girls who wear long, cute but bland cotton t-shirts?

06-24-13  06:18pm - 4199 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^ How could I forget about Audrey? I'd almost have to give her first place, or at least make it a tie. Amber Rayne is another one that comes to mind.

06-24-13  06:15pm - 4199 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^Not sure if Audrey Hollander came before her, after her or about the same time but she would be an excellent choice to compare with. Debbie Diamond is the one that precedes both of them and in some ways surpasses their wildness.

06-24-13  11:50am - 4199 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


IAFD is quite accurate with performers names and they only list two possible results for the name Kelly Wells. The one the OP asked about and the other is the performer that was mostly known as Kelly O'Dell. Neither of them worked at the same time and miss O'Dell's career was in the 90's while Kelly Wells started in mid 2000. KW was known for overboard porn. There's always at least one woman who'll do (almost) anything and she was it for a few years.


Ah, Kelly Wells! I was never keen on her looks but she was almost manic when it came to performing! I have yet to see the same over-the-top enthusiasm in any other porn actress. I still have most of her scenes for that reason. Even though lately I haven't looked at anything in my collection. Bad sign!!!

06-24-13  11:44am - 4199 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by GCode:


Hi I'm still kinda here lurking..I log in every once in awhile and participate in the polls and see if any replies are there. I still try to give out trusts if I see good reviews and reply to replies if needed regardless of the raffles. I check the forum every once in awhile, maybe I should try to be more active in it but I have been slacking. About 2 months ago, I had a rejuvenation and checked out a few sites I love and rejoined but I don't feel it necessary to review.

I like I still see names I recognize and I'm not sure anyone really recognizes me, It has been awhile since I have been active. But, I do appreciate the people who do stay active cuz I still check out things, even if I don't respond often. To add, the stuff I read is as great as ever, so I really do enjoy the insight everyone has in the polls, reviews, comments, replies, and forum even if I don't respond often. Thanks for the actives and I will try to make an appearance more, regardless of the raffles cuz I cared less before.


Hey, GCode, it's great to see a post from you. I've had you under my personal favorites since May 2009 and really missed your contributions to this site. Please stick around and help us liven up this forum. It's been in the doldrums for a while which is very frustrating to me because I like to gab. I've initiated a few threads but gave up because I found myself whining too much.


06-17-13  02:30pm - 4206 days #246
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Oddly VillageLadies still seems to be bimbling along in its quaint antiquated way.

Cap'n.



That alone tells me that there WOULD be a market out there for anyone bold enough to take the gamble.

Village Ladies, aarrghh!!! Last time I looked and made an enquiry about the site this is what I took away from it:

Rude Webmaster! He treated me with contempt. Don't like my site as it is .. too bad .. go somewhere else!

Outdated picture formats. (800x600 if you were lucky, most were smaller)

Terrible GUI and navigation. Infrequent updates.

Few beauties among the lot (even though in a weird way this tends to be a plus for me because I like the Neighbor Next Door look.)

Now imagine, if someone took a look at that site and said to himself: Self, I can do better than this! If HE can survive all these years with his inadequate offerings then there must be a demand for material like his.

06-17-13  12:35pm - 4206 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I can't speak for modern Europe or for individual countries in Europe, since I left Europe before there were any TV commercials but I can say that the basic attitude then was: sex is fine, violence isn't.

We had reputable weekly magazines at home on our coffee table that contained pages of nudes, often on the cover, and no one thought twice about it.

Funny thing, once Television established itself there was actually censoring or outright banning of some Warner Bros. cartoons like the roadrunner etc. because of the cartoon violence.

I guess Governments tend to go overboard once in a while in every culture.

Anyway, if I had to bet I would say that in most European countries sexy ads would be fine while violence would still be frowned upon. But things can change in 50+ years!

06-17-13  10:37am - 4206 days #243
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Things are rock bottom now.

Even my 2 or 3 regulars have drifted away.

I haven't felt motivated to take a subscription for ages.

Surely at some point we have to turn a corner & go back towards this softer genre?

Cap'n.


My sentiments exactly, Cap'n! I had four - five regulars but none of them are as exciting as they were five years ago. And I repeat, NO, I AM NOT JADED .. they just don't know how to tease any longer.

06-05-13  10:14am - 4218 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I agree that the old placement of the poll made it much more noticeable.
Now, unless you're specifically searching for the poll, you won't notice it's there, because it's lumped in with too many other things that come before it.

As far as my suggestion of spot advertising: if you prefer looking at an enlarged avatar of Wittyguy, so be it. Different strokes for different folks. Personally, I enjoy gazing at some of the fine models found at Metart.



Ooooh, THAT sort of advertising! Okay, bring it on!

06-04-13  12:13pm - 4219 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I agree that the new layout is a bit "blah" (almost like a blog layout) but I assume something new is in the works. Perhaps a full sized layout of my awesome avatar to let readers know what is in store for them here at PU


Well, your avatar would definitely be better than a 15 - 30 second commercial lk2fireone suggested under a different thread.

06-04-13  10:20am - 4219 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


Frankly, I don't like the new lay-out! Something is missing. To go straight to the latest user review seems wrong .. but then, as you get older, you don't very much like change!

Could we put the poll back on top with some sort of filler on the right hand of the page now that the raffle is gone. Maybe recommendations of new and exciting sites the TBP reviewers are running across? Or announcements of new discounts? Just a thought!

06-02-13  03:36pm - 4221 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Anyone know who this is?
Looked all over.



LOL. Must be the invisible woman, except to you and Khan, CT!

06-02-13  12:56pm - 4221 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


odd, the image is showing ok for me.
here is the URL:

http://s11.motherlessmedia.com/dev106/0/...5/262/0535262425.jpg


Now I get the message: Hotlinking is forbidden!

06-02-13  12:31pm - 4221 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


see if that works now?


Nope!

05-31-13  10:17am - 4223 days #30
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Still "shopping" , sir messmer......so far no luck.

Reflecting.....

Not surprisingly, I might've bitten off more than I can chew.


Could have told you, graymane. Why do you think I keep baying at the moon? Now get back to work and keep looking! That's an order!

05-30-13  11:39am - 4224 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


Hello gentlemen (and gentleladies),

Just wanted to drop in and touch base with you fine people here. I know I haven't been active in quite some time. Basically, I've had exceptionally low "T", and there are long stretches where the thought of sex (for me, that means: looking at porn) not only fails to interest but actually irritates me. I dumped all my naughty stuff, which amassed to upwards of 800 gigs - which I imagine is a piddly amount nowadays - and turned my mind to more "spiritual" avenues. Reading a lot about transhumanism, collective consciousness, quantum field theory, and the sometimes uncanny parallels between the ideas of a few modern theoretical physicists and ancient religious texts. I've also been busy with my poetry and my music.

That being said, while I type this I have a window open full of vintage photos of gals in their unmentionables. Oh how I wish I had my teens and twenties in those years, prior to this wretched era of thongs and tattoos!

Cheers!


I am so happy to see you again, WWW! Welcome back! Strange that I, too, have had my times when I turned my back on porn and started to read again .. my choices were not quite as intellectually challenging as yours, though!

And, oh, how I agree with your last sentence, even though we've had different views when it comes to "utilitarian unmentionables"

I sure hope you will stick around!

05-29-13  10:58am - 4225 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
And I am happy that the last raffle was won by veterans of this site who have become friends over the years. A fitting ending!



And thank you, TBP, for quite a few, very much appreciated, wins. I followed Denner's example and bought books for my wife at Amazon.ca with my winnings. Since I am not rich this was a big deal. But, as Khan knows, the raffle was never the reason why I came here. This is a classy site, with classy users and I enjoy the companionship.

05-28-13  10:17am - 4226 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by JoshG:


Well, not necessarily romantic but I'm wondering if anyone has any recommendations for sites that start scenes with making out and undressing rather than jumping straight into the action. Ideally, I'd love a site that spent a decent amount of each scene with making out, groping, fumbling to remove clothes, and foreplay (a blowjob is play, not foreplay, in my book).

So, any suggestions?


Good luck, Josh. I have been looking for a site like that for years. Most young people prefer scenes that start with "play" rather than foreplay and that's who most sites cater to. Why do you think I am baying at the moon? Pure frustration!

201-250 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 13 20 27 34 41 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.