Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

1901-1950 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 38 Page 39 40 42 44 46 51 52 Next Page >

03-01-10  09:12am - 5410 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


There was a big controversy last week in the Canadian Newspapers and on TV because of our "Own the podium" program this year. We were way below what we expected to have at that time. If they gave medals for 4th place then we would be way ahead of most Countries. Final count after today's win over the US is 26 medals, 14 of which are Gold. I guess we could change the program to "Own the Golden podium". Thank God for women because the bulk of our medlas is from Canadian females athletes. I'm probably in a minority but I tend to look at the Olympics as the best athletes of one Country competing against the best of another. Win or lose you are still the best your Country has produced. Yes losing isn't fun, but than again not particiapting can't be high either.


Naming the program "Own The Podium" was a stupid move. The British, and possibly other countries' media as well, had a field day with it. Why didn't they name it: "Strive for excellence" or something like that? In any case, we ended up watching more than we had planned and had a good time.

Thank God for CTV because NBC did its usual lousy job of covering the Olympics. And no one has answered my question yet: what's the proper way of determining the standings. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-28-10  12:07pm - 5411 days #79
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Now that sounds like very good news, KK!

Cap'n. :0)


Yeah, but ... continuing the relaxation of the law over decades? I don't have that long!

And thanks kkman!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-28-10  12:02pm - 5411 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Well, despite the fact that I said I wouldn't watch the Olympics I think I'll watch the U.S. - Canada game coming on in a few minutes! :-)

Nothing to do with hockey but can someone enlighten me when it comes to the overall standings. In my youth 1st Place was established by how many gold medals a country won. I see in some places it's still done that way:

http://www.olympiade-infos.de/olympische...t-page-1/#comment-20

while on this continent our media just take a total count of all the medals and determine first place by that. I kept telling my wife this was wrong and that a gold medal had to count for more than a bronze, that's why I went to a German site to see how other countries do it.

So what will be entered into the official Olympic record?

Is Canada first, Germany, second and the U.S. third or will this Olympics end up with U.S. first, Germany second and Canada third? I'm not being nationalistic about this, simply curious.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-28-10  10:06am - 5411 days #76
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


You didn't mention Japan as being a country with a lot of trimmed, but somewhat hairy women porn. For me that is one distinctive feature that is an improvement over most porn produced in the US.


I'm still dreaming of finding a good site featuring gorgeous Japanese models without that darn pixelation of the naughty bits. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-28-10  09:56am - 5411 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I like uniforms, but prefer real ones over those fake imitations some websites find or have made for them. I also like real everyday street clothes.


The latter is the only "uniform" I like: real everyday street clothes. The most abused and ridiculous looking is the nurses' uniform: those ridiculous, shiny vinyl caps with those oversized, home made red cross badges on them. Arghhh! Eastern Europe especially is infamous for its ridiculous uniforms.

Actually, come to think of it, there is one other uniform I do like: a hooker's outfit! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-27-10  11:58am - 5412 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I'm thinking about opening an anal porn site. My hook (copyrighted) would be to send a family-sized bottle of Vicodin with an enema bag with every pre-paid 12-month subscription.

Would I get into trouble with the authorities if I don't have a medical license? Are there any perverts out there with an M.D. degree that are willing to front this web site for me?


Never mind the authorities. It wouldn't work because most of the guys approaching their significant others with a request for anal with an enema bag in one hand and a bottle of pain relievers in the other would get slapped, right after she's done wrecking their computer. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-27-10  08:39am - 5412 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


As for your position that anal sex is repulsive or dirty, I have to say that I disagree with that. Anal sex takes preparation and all the girls who do anal in porn would take some steps to prepare. Enemas are the most obvious solution. Some behind-the-scenes clips in anal themed movies have the girls talking about how they prepare and all of those interviewed use enemas. So after an enema and a shower, she's squeaky clean and any repulsion is your issue to deal with.


I was watching part of the AVN awards the other day and one of the stars was asked "How do you like doing anals?" Her reply: "If you like enemas and dieting 24 hours before a scene and having to take Vicodine" I suppose it's okay!" (the above is paraphrased but is a true reflection of her answer).

One of the other major anal queens (Amber Rayne?) jumped in very quickly to counteract that damaging remark: "I love doing anals!" Was she sincere? Who knows.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-26-10  10:24am - 5413 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


It's like that sometimes - I can't watch slasher films anymore - watched them when I was a kid, now I just can't deal with it - not that anything horrible like that has happened to me or anybody I know but it just gets me in a way that is as far from enjoyable as I want to get. I find that I need to find material that's as inoffensive as I can late at night - like after 10 PM - Frazier re-runs are perfect and are always on.

I wouldn't watch Tarantino's friend Eli Roth's films on a fucking bet!


Never could watch slasher films, or shows/movies where a woman is being raped or where a child gets killed. Instant channel switch when it comes to all of the above. Just like you I prefer my late night fare light and emotionally undemanding. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-10  06:40pm - 5415 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


That first scene in Inglorious Basterds was sadistic? In what way? It showed the Gestapo at work - and the Gestapo were sadistic - but the scene itself was not sensationalistic in any way - it refrained from showing anything - and I was glad it did.

Exotics - I don't watch much animated stuff - I lose interest too easy somehow.

Pulp Fiction is amazing - I can watch it once a month and enjoy it.


Well, I must say it was brilliantly done, PP. There was indeed no overt sadism in the scene but such a sense of menace that it made me shudder because that's exactly how the Gestapo worked. They were masters of intimidation and psychological terror. I would give Tarantino an A+ for achieving this in his film but what made the scene so great made it so emotionally bad for me. Same as the long scene in the cellar later on. Brilliant, but I didn't have a nerve left after that one! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-10  02:10pm - 5415 days #40
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


It must be pure coincidence that I was thinking exactly the same thing. I guess we must all be far too sceptical, but I know I wouldn't touch that place with a barge pole.


Hi squirrel, good to see you. You guys may add me to the ranks of cynics.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-10  02:08pm - 5415 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Well, you guys have better nerves and stomachs than I. :-) I gave up on enjoying "Inglourious Basterds" after that very first sadistic scene where the German played cat and mouse with the French farmer. I did watch the rest of the movie but was glad when it was over. This is not an attack on Tarantino and his skill as a film maker, so don't pile on me, just blame my overly sensitive nature when it comes to graphic violence and sadistic mind games.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-23-10  02:12pm - 5416 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


I'll be damned....my access is blocked - again. This is turning out to be a joke...


This site couldn't have too many subscribers if the webmaster has the time to play silly (and illegal) games.
I've had various webmasters after me in outrage over a review or comment but none of them ever cut me off until my subscription was over.

Get a refund from Epoch and then add a new comment, laying it all out, on this particular site's page. I can't see where they could touch you legally just for telling the truth, and TBP can't afford to look like cowards in the eyes of its loyal members if it censors your outrage.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-23-10  09:02am - 5416 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		If only you had enough money to hire a good lawyer .. wow, you could retire early, Denner. What that webmaster did (and you have proof through his email) absolutely stinks and is illegal as well. Hope you get this settled to your satisfaction and soon.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-20-10  07:44pm - 5419 days #66
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


No I saw some articstic pictures inwhich they happened to be fully nude. Although pubes sticking out of a bathing suit would be rather funny.


I used to dream about that scenario when I was a youngster, a few stray hairs escaping the leg openings of bathing suit or panties ... wow! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-20-10  09:53am - 5419 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I have to wonder, how did/do you like it? You picked a good day to start, as today was really, really entertaining on Live with Lauren. Like I said in my Naughty America review, that show is probably my favorite thing about the entire site.


In one sentence: Naughty America impresses the hell out of me now! I loved the live show(s)! Normally I go to a site, look at the latest updates and depart. That darn live aspect made me stick around for hours and was highly entertaining. I also found lots of dressing and undressing in the archives of former live shows and am a happy camper.

Last time around I accused them of a certain sameness when it came to their scenes and it might still be there but who cares, live is it for me from now on and would make it worth the price of a subscription. Especially with our discount. I have the feeling I am going to keep this one going! Of course, I'll still download or stream all the sexy mature ladies they offer to their subscribers.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-20-10  09:43am - 5419 days #89
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		All right!!! Looking forward to that. Good show, Cap'n.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  04:13pm - 5420 days #59
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Ditto for me. I'm a bit of a geezer too and still like it bare. A little runway is fine too, just not massive bush.


I guess it's once again to each his own and that one (I) should not make sweeping generalizations when it comes to age gaps etc. LLTB! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  04:09pm - 5420 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I bet if guys had a penile equivalent to breast implants (I mean relatively easy with a tolerable recovery time and not a lot of complications) we would be doing the same thing. I can just imagine the doctor-patient conversation:

Doc: "So, Mr. Johnson, do you want the baby carrot upgrade or the full cucumber option?"

Patient: "Well, I really only need a couple of inches...oh screw it, as long as you're down there lets go the whole hog."

Doc: (sighing) "Yeah, that's what they all say."

Let's not kid ourselves here; some women really want the full benefit that's physically possible. To be honest, if I was a girl going under knife I would be considering going all the way, not some half-ass hint-at-an-implant job but the full eye-opening treatment.


My main objection to implants is that they look bolted on in most models, a natural breast with the exception of an a-cup (maybe) will sag a bit and not look like a perfect inflated sphere.

On top of that, if you look at some of those videos closely you can actually see the bags wrinkle under the skin, or see their outline, if it's a really bad job. Many girls try to cover that by holding on to their breasts as they do a reverse cowboy. It just ain't natural, why not be content with what you've been given .. so, in my case, no to the increased penis size. I don't worry about things like that! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  03:57pm - 5420 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Jesus... This is the second time today that I can quote Drooler and say "same for me." Most of my friends suggest that I'm not a breast man. That's not true, I just like 'em small. A-cup is perfection for me. Like Aubrey Addams before she got herself "enhanced." :-(

That gives me an idea, maybe us anti-boob-job guys should take a page from the right-wing Cristian playbook. They harass abortion providers and the women using the clinics. Maybe we should band together and start protesting at boob-job clinics. I'll start making posters and signs right now. If anyone can think of a bible quote that supports our cause let me know. Lat's save the A-cups!


And the B-cups with a bit of a sag to them! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  03:53pm - 5420 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by moonbyrd:


Sweeping generalizations based on inaccurate/incomplete data are seldom advisable.

I expect many people pick the movies they want to see at least partly based on who's in it (or who directed it or who wrote it). I know I do. Of course that doesn't mean they blindly want to watch any movie, no matter how bad, that certain favorite actor happens to appear in. However, a familiar name in the credits may raise certain expectations (justified or not) about the work.

I don't see why porn would be a different matter. There are models/porn stars who bring a certain quality/personality to their scenes. (On the other hand, my impression - correct or not - is that these days directors/photographers are in danger of sinking into obscurity. Deservedly or not. There were some porn auteurs in earlier days, and there may still be, but the "disposable" quality of Internet porn does not seem to be conducive to that kind of phenomenon.)

Yes, there may be people who want to "collect" everything with a certain model, no matter how badly photographed etc. I guess I can see the attraction, and digital media make this kind of pack-rat completism deceptively easy. On the other hand it makes one lose sight of what the porn viewing experience should be about.


I love sweeping generalizations, moonbyrd! :-)

Nevertheless I think my thesis, no matter how subjective, holds a certain merit. For instance, there are groupies who would follow a rock band no matter how old or how bad they have become. There are folks who are so smitten with a particular movie star that they would go watch every movie he/she appears in.

In my more limited world I'll go see my favorite if he/she is in a Comedy, if he/she performs in a Drama .. forget it.
There's no right or wrong to it, simply personal taste. I just don't want to be burdened at the movies with heavy subject matter. If I want drama I have enough of that in real life. :-)

Same with Porn. I have a few favorites but because of my taste, and like or dislike of certain actions which shall remain nameless lest I offend anyone, I only download scenes or photo sets of theirs that fall within my favorite niches.

One sentence of yours has me baffled: what should the Porn Viewing experience be all about? Wouldn't that depend on who does the viewing?

Regards and good to see you in this forum!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  10:24am - 5420 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


3 girls, 2-3 shows each, Monday-Friday (except holidays). And usually, at least 1 girl each day has natural breasts. And in what is probably the best thing about them, you should be able to check out what the shows look like without being a member from their tour page.


Just a quick question. I just subscribed again for no other reason but the "live shows" but what's facing me right now is a notice saying: "We will return to our live broadcast in a moment." (That's live with Lauren) I've also tried the other models and all I get are teasers. Last question: how do I get to the archives of the models dressing or undressing? Is there a button I'm ignoring. Excuse my ignorance but I'm brand new at this live business.

Forget everything I wrote above. Must have been a temporary glitch because the live show is working fine now and quite entertaining. Also forget about my question re. archives, should have read your original post again before asking. Thanks. Edited on Feb 19, 2010, 11:23am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  09:53am - 5420 days #87
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		A gratuitous post: I just noticed that I had posted 666 times in this forum which is not considered to be a good number so I am hastily promoting myself to 667. I thank you in advance for your tolerance re. really getting off the subject!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  09:40am - 5420 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		You know, I am starting to understand why photographers get away with publishing such mind numbingly boring sets. Let me hasten to stress: To me! Many of you guys collect by model so anything, anything at all that's new on her site will be downloaded, exciting or not because the goal is to have as many sets of her as possible.

In contrast, most of the solo sites you mention above were hardly ever visited by me when I was a member of 21sextury because I collect by niche and would, to this day, not be able to give you most of the names of the stars whose pictures, videos I collect. Basically I collect the scenes and sets I like and ignore the many others by them that I don't. I too have some favorites, of course but am just pointing out the difference when it comes to the methods of collecting.

Each of the methods is equally valid and there is no criticism intended. It's just an "AHA!" moment for me because it explains something that was baffling to me before: why put out so many sets of a model that are basically identical except for the first ten pictures or so. If you do collect "names" you would want them all. If my model, on the other hand, doesn't wear enough sexy lingerie or steps outside one of my favorite niches her set/scene gets rejected, pretty face, body and all.

Aha, now I get it! :-) Edited on Feb 19, 2010, 09:44am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  09:15am - 5420 days #56
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Is "AllHairy" still in business, I wonder. I haven't seen a review or comment in ages. I know I could go and check but by asking here I'll give you a helping hand with the rejuvenation of the thread. It's a fascinating subject! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  09:11am - 5420 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FuckingGambler:


It depends. If the game is played in the pool or on the yacht, usually they do not have too much to take off for obvious reasons. If the game is played in more traditional setting, usually girls wear outfits which are more or less similar to everyday life, with five or six items to take off, and stockings usually preferred over tights (see for example recent Game 24).

As a side note, our 3-day trial is mere $2.95 (EUR 2.12 for European customers), and it shows everything we have to offer (with the only limitation being download limit of 6G for the duration of the trial), so if my explanation above sounds good enough, it might be a good idea to try our site (we GUARANTEE that if you do not like it, you will be able to unsubscribe within trial time).

In addition, I would like to mention that we are very open to suggestions coming from our members, so if you (or any other PornUser member) have any specific ideas about any aspect of the game you would like to see (from outfits to actions), please express them here, or in our forums, or in e-mail to support@fuckinggamble.com, and we will try to implement them. There are certain limitations, and it will take some time to organize shooting and see the end result, but if your point of view is feasible to implement and will not be opposed by the other members too vigorously, we will be happy to try doing it at least once, and if feedback will be positive - to make it a regular feature.


It looks as if you are really receptive to the wishes of your members which is always a good sign. You are also winning me over with your statement that you prefer stockings to tights. :-) I have never, ever, gone the trial route but might just take you up on the suggestion. Thanks!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-10  09:02am - 5420 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Colm4:


For some reason, women think that men like big breasts and do the implants for that reason only.
Too bad that those who like them big are usually the hardest shouters. You don't hear men at parties or whatnot saying they like them small. Probably they get laughed at.


Women have good reason to think so if you look at the success of sites like Brazzers who specialize in fake. There is a strange fascination in America with big boobs. I think they have that to themselves because males in other countries are quite content with natural. At least that has been my experience.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-10  06:17pm - 5421 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


3 girls, 2-3 shows each, Monday-Friday (except holidays). And usually, at least 1 girl each day has natural breasts. And in what is probably the best thing about them, you should be able to check out what the shows look like without being a member from their tour page.


Thanks, I'm going back right now to take the tour again. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-10  11:42am - 5421 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FuckingGambler:


While I certainly cannot guarantee that it will suit your taste, I suggest to take a look at our site FuckingGamble.com. Our videos start with models dressed, playing some game (from blackjack to go-karts or paintball) and undressing before proceeding to the action. They also play for some time in various stages of undressing. We also spend substantial efforts on what we call "ultra-reality", which includes keeping video continuity as much as possible, without "magically" disappearing clothing or "magic" jumps between different scenes.


Thanks for the tip, FG. Another site I checked out only yesterday in response to someone's comment or review! It sounded tempting but I couldn't get a clear cut idea if the undressing involved lots of sexy lingerie or just three, four pieces of apparel.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-10  11:39am - 5421 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I will say that you're not going to find what you're looking for at a mega-site or a network site, you're going to have to go smaller. What you want, honestly, just isn't where the market is at right now, it seems. Just think about the fact that there's a very legitimate chance that Brazzers is the most popular (as in most subscribed to) porn site on the internet, or at the very least in North America.

And a small tip, if you're still around at Naughty America: check out some of their live show archives. I doubt you'd be interested in the actual live shows (too many idiots around sometimes), but within the shows, a lot of the girls take 15-25 of the 35-45 minutes getting undressed (although some have their clothes off in the first 5 minutes, too). I'd start off with Tori Black, as she really loves the tease, and tries to extend it as long as possible.


Thanks a lot for the tip re. Naughty America, I checked out their site only yesterday because they offered me a special price as a former subscriber, and found to my delight that there was a live section, something I had totally ignored first time around. I still have a huge problem with enhanced breasts (same as with Brazzers) so I regretfully passed. But I must say your remarks tempt me to try again! I'd probably end up dwelling exclusively in the live section if the undressing of the girls is a daily event!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-10  11:31am - 5421 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


Go on to the eurobabeindex forum and seek out the user tiger who posts frequently and who works for 21Sextury.

Every site goes through their set of issues some time along the way. This is just porn, try not to take it too seriously.

Remember when we used to have to pay $100 for a single crappy VHS of a few scenes? This site was $20 for the month, $10 of which goes to pornusers.com, $3 goes to epoch, $2 goes to their bandwidth and server costs. In the end 21Sextury netted just $5.


NOT take Porn seriously? That's an outrageous statement. I hope Khan will severely censor you for that remark. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  04:05pm - 5422 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Would you believe I've never been to a real adult bookstore. They don't exist in my neck of the woods. There were bookstores that sold some adult magazines but that was about it. And I hated it if they had females at the check out!

So, three cheers for the World Wide Web!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  04:02pm - 5422 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


You sound like you could be describing way too many sites videos, but in either a good or bad way! ;)


LOL. I agree,turboshaft, "jiggly" was ambiguous and suggestive!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  03:53pm - 5422 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


Have to agree with Canada. As much as I'd love to see the US win it, I really don't think they have the firepower.

And honestly, I agree with Messmer. I dislike the inclusion of pros. Maybe due to the fact of being a American, there will never be another Miracle on Ice. In part due to the fact that pros are used now. The other part being the fact that ABC showed the game on tape delay, so most of the country didn't even know who won when it happened. In todays age of instant information via tv, cell phone, internet, I still find that amazing.

I realize the 2nd part really has nothing to do with the first, just got a little lost in my rant. LOL


I still remember "the miracle on ice!" It was a great and heart warming event. The Olympic spirit was alive at that moment!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  02:53pm - 5422 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Well, at least give it a few weeks.
I have been having extended correspondence with the webmaster and he seems keen to follow most of my suggestions, as they seem to fall in with his preferences.

Just hang in there a while. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)


I will, cap'n. I'm there for almost three more months. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  02:29pm - 5422 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


The problem with letting the majority decide, when it comes to matters of taste, is that what is considered popular is too often mediocre. In short, popularity does not mean quality.

But it's probably good for business!



Couldn't have put it better myself, Drooler! And seeing that the webmaster has to make a living I decided to wait and see what the rest of his subscribers prefer. He should be able to tell by the download figures of a certain set of pictures or video. In the meantime I keep my fingers crossed and hope that most feel as I do. It would be nice to finally subscribe to the ideal site! I'll even allow it some imperfections. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  01:51pm - 5422 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I feel your frustration, my friend.

Be patient with WeAreHairy, there are changes coming there. ;0)


Did you see the comment on one of the recent (yesterday's?) sets by someone called Eric?: too many pictures of women fully clothed and not enough nudes. Paraphrased! GASP!

If he is not one of the photographers but one of their subscribers I can't see a great change coming. You somehow have to please that segment too.

If most of my subscribers weren't interested in the subtleties of a nice, gradual strip I would cater to their taste, it only makes good business sense. That's why I told the webmaster I would make no more comments re. my expectations. One can't please everyone, and he does have a super site he's trying to build, so, let the majority decide there.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  01:15pm - 5422 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

Okay, it's been talked (typed) to death (especially by me) but I want all my PU friends to get their heads together to find me my ideal site. :-)

I am presently subscribing long-term to two Video sites as well as to two other sites on a three months and one month basis, respectively. I have not downloaded more than a handful of files in over a week from all of them combined, making me doubt the wisdom of subscribing to any of these known, to me, sites in the future unless they change dramatically which I doubt.

So, here is where I need your help:

I need you to come up with the ideal site for me. I have greatly reduced my requirements and expectations over the years so things like age and shaved or not shaved, thin or BBW no longer play a role. Except for "enhanced" breasts. Definitely no fake boobs, ever!!! :-)

Here are just a couple or three basic requirements I am looking for:

1) In a picture site I want my models to start fully dressed, which means with underwear the average woman would wear on a daily basis. No going commando, no going bra-less, thongs will be tolerated (just) if there are enough front views. A thin string disappearing between cheeks just doesn't do it for me.

The disrobing should be slow so that only the last page of a set would contain full nudity! What's the sense of publishing four pages of torsos and rumps or even whole model nudity. Wouldn't, let's say, ten or maybe twenty pictures do the trick there? When is enough enough if most shots only have very slight differences from each other?

2) DVD sites. Please, a story line in most of the DVD scenes offered. Something that leads gradually up to the action, once again containing a slow disrobing scene (as would be the case in normal relationships) before they get to the main action. I would like to see the sex reduced by at least ten minutes to save me all the fast forwarding.

Why have all those twenty minute marathons exhibiting every awkward sexual position possible and even then the male performers have to masturbate themselves to a climax? Does that excite you, honestly?

Naughty America makes a bit of an attempt to give a reason for the upcoming tryst, but they are OUT because the lead-in to the action is too short and too obviously contrived. They tend to jump from fully clothed to fully naked on the nearest bed, sofa, desk etc without a transition. Their pre-occupation with big (read enhanced) breasts is also a huge minus.

So there you have it, friends. And no, I'm not jaded, just bored with all the scenes that jump right into action from the first minute. You know the routine when it comes to DVDs, model sits on sofa, gets introduced, gets on her knees to be approached from left and right by two stunt cocks already fully erect for some reason. Well, I know the reason but it's not pertinent to the scene. :-) This is followed by twenty minutes of changing positions topped by a very feeble ejaculation because they had to do something beforehand so that they would last.

So if in your wanderings you came across any site that even comes close to my hopes .. please let me know!

Hopeful and with apologies to those who like things just the way they are. And sorry about venting once again. I know it's a downer but so is spending a couple of hundred dollars on things that don't satisfy.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  11:50am - 5422 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Hey messmer - I'm really confused - do you mean that the pros in NHL should not participate in the OL - if so - who else is left?
It's over the many years always been great to watch when NHL-players are in the Olympics or World Championship - many years ago I loved watching the canadians beat the russians or the swedish - or any one else. Just was not happy about one thing: That the canadian stars at NHL HAD to play NHL - and could not get time off to play in those world series.
Still Canada is the top when it comes to great hockey - always been a big fan of both Toronto Maple Leafs and Montreal Canadians - and the stars over the years:
Bobby Orr, Mario Lemieux or the legendary Gordie Howe just to name a few...
Go, Canada, go!


Would you believe that I actually shook Gordie Howe's hand, Denner? :-) Shows my age! My view is that the Olympic Games were meant to be for amateurs. If a less skilled amateur hockey team had to be fielded because all the good players were Pros then, so be it. Medals aren't everything, the "amateur" youth of all continents getting together in friendly competition is. I know, I know ... wild eyed idealism.

The whole Olympic ideal has been corrupted because, in the now defunct Soviet Union and its satellites, every athlete became a full time, paid pro because they wanted to prove to the world that their system was the best.

That gave Canada and the U.S. the reason and excuse for fielding "dream teams" in varying sports made up of professionals. I understood the reasoning even though I did not like it because it was NOT fair to us at the time that we had to compete against all those East Block Pros, but since athletes are now no longer so heavily sponsored by the State (clearly evident in the diminished medal counts) it is my belief that we should return to the purer model of absolutely no Pros! Just my thoughts. And it'll never happen, I'm sure. At least not in Canada where we can always hope for one medal in Hockey if we leave the present set-up alone. :-) Edited on Feb 17, 2010, 01:55pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-10  08:57am - 5422 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		We stopped watching the Winter and Summer Olympics about six years ago because the coverage on American and Canadian channels had become too nationalistic. We missed so many events and medal ceremonies, because none of our athletes were involved and therefore weren't covered by our media, that we gave up in disgust.

I think the straw that finally broke the camel's back was in track and field (one of our favorites). All we saw was an endless coverage of beach volley ball and similar events because the North American audience was not terribly interested in track and field except, once again, for the events in which their athletes shone and expected to get a medal.

I also dislike the inclusion of pros in the games (yes, even the male Canadian Hockey team) and the doping and the inclusion of sports that call for judges who tend to be either prejudiced or corrupt.

Sorry for dampening anyone's enthusiasm in connection with the Games but it's the way we feel. :-(
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-10  04:01pm - 5423 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Obviously you haven't been watching the Bourne movies with what's his name.
As a secret agent, you reduce your porn stash to microfilm, and then have it inserted into your body somewhere. I forget where Bourne had it inserted. And I don't really remember why the fisherman who treated Bourne for gunshot wounds was able to find and remove the microfilm that had been inserted into Bourne's body.

Anyway, by reducing your porn stash to microfilm, and having it inserted into your body, you are able to carry it with you wherever you go.

And Bourne and the fisherman were able to read the microfilm without using a special microfilm reader.

(Maybe I should watch the movie again, to try to understand how they could read a microfilm without a microfilm reader.)

The microfilm or whatever it was that was inserted into Bourne's body had the number of a secret Swiss bank account. But if you think about it, it doesn't really make much sense. Because why would he need to have the account number on microfilm that was inserted into his body? He should have been able to remember the number of the account. Unless he was psychic and somehow foresaw that he would get amnesia because he had been shot and was under a lot of mental stress, that caused the amnesia.

But the Bourne movies are good action movies, and you're not supposed to think about the logic of what's happening, but just enjoy the ride.

The same for porn: Don't think about the RCMP while you're trying to enjoy your porn, or you might develop serious problems, like Bourne did.


Nice little diversion into Spy territory, lk2fireone. BTW, I loved the first Bourne Movie (actually my favorite thriller of all time), despite some of its improbabilities, :-) but hated the sequels because of the hand held camera angle! Every scene was too much into your face and jiggly.

As to the RCMP, that's what I meant, I don't give them a thought because I haven`t seen anyone prosecuted for the possession of porn lately. Unless it is illegal, of course, and none of mine is. I don`t think!

Ever since the Internet came into being there`s been very little talk about the legality of possessing porn in Canada. With the exception of underage material, of course.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-10  02:35pm - 5423 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


messmer, it sounds like you follow an intelligent, well-thought out approach to "safe internet browsing".
On the other hand, if the U.S. government, or the Canadian government in your case, wanted to collect information on all the people who have joined pay porn sites, your IP address(es) would almost certainly be included, unless you have been masking that with some computer program.

Also, I would guess that real computer experts would be able to examine your computers which have been wiped clean of past history logs, and reconstruct those logs. I'm not an expert, but that's my guess.

The "safe" approach would be what justme suggested: "pay in cash, leaving behind no record of the purchase". It's more expensive, less convenient, but much safer if you want to keep your porn activity really private.


No question that no system is fool proof. I forgot to mention that I also do any deleting through CCleaner which will over-write a file three times but am convinced at the same time that any intelligent tekkie could find out about my porn habits if he tried. All the methods I use to protect my privacy are basically meant to protect my stash from the curious eyes of grandchildren and not from the Police or RCMP, they can look all they want.

As to the safe approach I can't see where leaving a DVD kicking around the house would guarantee more protection from prying eyes than my method! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-10  01:25pm - 5423 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


Could be for a number of types of people

those who do not want to risk getting their computer infected from browsing shady sites - cost of a dvd is cheaper than paying someone to clean up a computer

those who fear computer data tracking, or someone finding the computer browser history logs

those who want to pay in cash, leaving behind no record of the purchase


1. My experience has been that all of the pay sites I subscribed to were squeaky clean when it came to viruses or back door trojans. The shady ones were the free sites where one could pick up one of those beasties easy enough.

2. As to computer history logs, I use Firefox which clears all new cookies, history etc. upon exit. On top of that I use CCleaner which takes care of areas of info storage I might overlook.

3. I use a credit card that is only a credit card in the sense that I can pay for porn, books etc. with it but has only as much credit on it as I put in from my checking account on a monthly basis. No statements are being sent to my home with a card like that. I check through on-line banking to make sure that those with whom I do business are kept honest.

My on-line buying has been all positive so far.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-14-10  04:12pm - 5425 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Hey!

I represent that remark!


Cap'n. :0)



Well, of course you do, Cap'n! Admirably too, so stand proud and tall! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-14-10  09:07am - 5425 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Nice assessment, wittyguy. I had to give up on the transvestiting, though because women's lingerie became indistinguishable from men's underwear, they also gave up wearing dresses in favor of jeans, so in order to dress like a woman I would have had to dress like a man .. which I do already! So there was quite a period of wrenching adjustment for me. At the moment I'm looking for a new kink but haven't found one yet except for corresponding with a bunch of perverts.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-13-10  09:43am - 5426 days #83
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I have to agree in my frustration with Toby.
Far too much zoomed in portrait format & not enough relaxed landscape full body shots.
The only time he goes to landscape is after she starts to strip.
Even a few full body, fully clothed shots in landscape format at the start would improve his work substantially for me.
It is a shame.
He gets really nice models but I don't feel he does them justice.

BMB/Wanton.
Very frustrating again. They usually start off OK, but there is very little in the way of nudity in their sets.

A pulled up skirt & top showing the bits is not nude!

Cap'n. :0/


What gets me about landscape shots (a format both of us love) in general is that most photographers only use them to take pictures of a torso, or the pubic area rather than show the whole person. :-(
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-12-10  08:32am - 5427 days #42
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Turboshaft, you certainly got GOOD points here.. well spoken!

'I think this had some good results because the majority of Europeans had such a shock of witnessing firsthand how cruelly people and nations could treat one another. As a result (with U.S. money to help) western Europe became one of the more civilized and progressive regions in the world in the decades that followed.'

When Hitler invaded Poland, the asshole had 'a go' from Stalin - allied - the two sons of bitches.
Then UK stood alone! - after the rest of Europe had fallen - literally the British had their back to the wall...
And the first major victory was the defeat of the nazi-uboats - and an opening for a much better help from the USA - though a LOT of US-sailors had lost their lives up till that time.
Then came El Alamein i '42 and Stalingrad in '43, then Italy, then D-day in Normandy....
BUT before Hitler invaded Russia (June 22, 1941 - Operation Barbarossa) - no one should never forget the alliance between Hitler and Stalin.
Of course Hitler met his fate in the East and millions of russians were cannon fodder - again thanks to Stalin - BUT: this was fighting on OWN soil for the russians - NOT for the US and Canadian soldiers in the west of Europe...
Did not know that expression: 'French Fries' - but still got shelves of WWII military history......anyone know who assassinated Ernst Roehm?

Anyway - we europeans in the old West - owe our freedom and lives to the sacrifice of US, British and Canadian soldiers... try to visit the Normandy Coast (France) when you get to Europe.


I never meant to give the impression that the Soviet Union did the fighting in order to make sure we kept our freedom. I am simply stating the fact that without their huge sacrifices (for selfish reasons, no doubt) the war might have taken a different turn or have lasted considerably longer.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-11-10  08:29am - 5428 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Yeah, a few who'd just got out of relationships and were feeling down on romance.

Sure, it's a greeting-card holiday that has no real historical significance. Still, seems a lot of ladies put stock in getting a valentine. My thinking is, if it's important to them, then is a small enough gesture for me to make it a special day.


Can't argue with that, Khan! I'd do the same thing if it was important to my wife.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-10-10  01:32pm - 5429 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


It probably ties in somewhere with why I don't date anymore, but I've never been a fan of Hallmark "holidays". Ever the idealist, I figure if you can't tell her you love her any other day, I'll be damned if I'm going to pay someone for a token that says it.


Thanks, RB. My wife and I feel exactly the same way!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-10-10  01:15pm - 5429 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Good to be back around. Thanks

Interesting answers, btw.

It's funny, years ago when I polled a bunch of folks (mainly women) the answers were sort of split. The younger ones went for the larger box while the older ones (who were a bit more concerned with maintaining their figure) thought the sentiment of the heart box carried more weight.


A warm welcome back from me as well, Khan. One question: in your poll did you come across anyone who ignored Valentine's Day altogether? :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-10-10  12:07pm - 5429 days #36
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Man.....Drooler - thanks for this fine input.
That your health system is an 'utter disgrace' is well known to some/a lot of europeans - but in the long run that can be taken care of from back here....something like 'world-wide-health-security' some ok (after all) companies deals with that here in Denmark.

Was a little hard on the french, agree - but it's also how a lot of Scandinavians see it, it's still:
Oh, we (the french) won the Second World War for Europe - NADA! - It was thanks to the british and above all the USA and the sacrifice of US-troops that Europe got to be a free place to live after 1945. AND during the Cold War, too..

We OWE our freedom to the USA - and the british, of course!

But what is this 'Freedom Fries'? - never heard of it...


When it comes to WWII I think the Russians played the biggest part in winning it even though the U.K., Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the U.S. etc. played a big part, of course. When it comes to the war in the Pacific I give the Americans full marks even though other nations were involved there as well!

The French contribution in comparison to those countries was pathetic. You would have never known it as they swaggered down the main street of my home town during the occupation. Germans better got out of the way of the conquerors! :-) I am nevertheless a Francophile, I just hate their waiters!!!

As to the cold war, yes, thanks America (and secondarily NATO). We appreciate it!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

1901-1950 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 38 Page 39 40 42 44 46 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.06 seconds.