Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: turboshaft (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1958)  |   Threads Started (41)

1201-1250 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 24 Page 25 26 29 32 35 39 40 Next Page >

06-12-10  02:35pm - 5307 days #175
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


Who knows, if I was so rich that 100,000$ TV wasn't even an issue maybe I'd be as big an A..hole.


You might have to be an inventive a-hole; that thing's got to be a bitch to get in the door. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-12-10  01:14pm - 5307 days #14
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Governments prosecuting morality crimes really pisses me off. Unless its my morality that they're enforcing, and then I'm fine with it, of course


I have serious doubts about my government's 'morality.' It's the same morality that allows the use of the death penalty, including on the mentally retarded. Is that moral? Or how about the unwavering refusal to enact universal access to health care, even just for those under 18. Is that moral? How about misleading an entire country into a large multi-year war on the premise that if we didn't we could all be dead? Is that moral as well?

If this is what our government considers 'moral' then I want to have nothing to do with them. They can tell me to stop looking at naked ladies when they begin to show the slightest respect and dignity for human life and liberty. And even then I will be extremely skeptical.


Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


An extreme example, and not entirely applicable I realize, is the invasion of Panama to "arrest" Manuel Noriega.


Ah yes, the most expensive arrest warrant in history. Enough said.

---

And your final great point:

Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


If max does go back to producing new content, I wonder if he'll pull back. I find with Max's stuff that I've seen it's like watching a train wreck - you know there's gonna be carnage, but you can't help but watch. He's a strange man.


He may be strange but what does it say about all of us who cannot stop watching? He's only doing what his fans obviously want to see, or at least what they are willing to tolerate, which may be closer to each other than we realize. The line between "more, please" and "that's enough right there, mister" is a fine one indeed, and ol' Max made a career out of exploring and exploiting it to, well, the max.

He hired the girls, he convinced them to be in at least one scene, and he caught it all on tape for us to witness (or enjoy, if that's your cup of tea), but ultimately the viewers bought them, so who's more guilty? Hell, even the fucking authorities bought the 'obscene' material--he didn't exactly shove it down their throats like they had just walked on one of his sets in pigtails and crazy teen makeup. But you can't arrest everybody (yet...) so go after the pervy old man with a camera and nice house who has the balls to "wreck" a few trains. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-10  01:27pm - 5308 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I was trying to puzzle out how a woman could masturbate without "getting her hands anywhere near her pussy,"


This may be more for sports fans, but couldn't she superglue a vibrator to the end of a baseball bat?

I'm sure this could help if a woman had wrist problems (unlike us guys who already have at least one wrist of steel by our mid teens...). Still, why would anyone not want to use their hands--after all, there's no substitute for the 'human touch.' "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-10  01:16pm - 5308 days #170
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Does the $100k 3-D tv come with it's own nuclear reactor to power the damn thing? At the very least it should be internet ready with thousands of prepaid porn memberships too.


It better come with it's own UPS (uninterruptible power supply) and forklift--with a pretty girl to set it all up for you! And if you pay with credit card, they throw in the cables for free!

But seriously, who the hell needs a 152" physical display in their home anyway? There are more than enough projectors out there to fit a requirement for 150+" of display, assuming you have the wall and room space to do it. And most projectors are a fraction of the price of a display that looks like it requires a heavy crane to move. The only advantage I could see to owning one of these things (besides proving to all your friends how strong your floors are) is the extreme-super-high definition level of resolution available, but who exactly needs that?

If you're watching porn at that resolution you might as well be a San Fernando Valley dermatologist whose clients are too busy to schedule an appointment so you have to watch one of their latest videos instead (in the privacy of your own home, late at night... ). Or you just love new toys that really have no purpose other than to say to rest of the world "Hey, look at me! I'm rich and you're not, you fuckers! Ha ha ha!" Kinda reminds of Lexus' recent LFA supercar, which costs a cool $350,000 (and that's just the base price), and apparently requires prospective buyers be approved before the company will sell you one, meaning just because you have the money doesn't mean you can own one. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-10-10  09:42pm - 5309 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


The funny thing is that it was an undercover FBI agent that ordered the Max video's to be shipped to Florida. That smells of entrapment but like you said.


Yeah, it was total bullshit, and I hate entrapment because it makes the government look more guilty than the supposed criminals, who are criminals in great part due to the actions of law enforcement. Something really stinks when a crime has to be created in order to catch a target in the first place. The same shit happened with Tommy Chong and his glass bong business; a big order from a law enforcement agent posing as a civilian who kept fucking with Chong's business until it would have been a large financial loss for them to just cancel the order.

Assholes! Could they, oh if even for just a few hours, spent a bit of that law enforcement time, money, and manpower on something worth pursuing. Are these morons not aware of the 9/11 attacks and how obvious they made the necessity of law enforcement to track those intending to attack and kill people, not those who just what to help them get stoned or tape them fucking? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-10-10  09:24pm - 5309 days #9
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I suppose he could move to Europe but why? He's an internet based guy so where he shoots from is irrelevant. If he's on probation he'll be prohibited from moving abroad anyway. My guess is that he'll focus more on the European market for his wares and less so here while working on his So. Cal. tan.


I don't think he lost his house in the case (at least not that I'm aware of) and it has all that bright furniture and easy to clean tile floors that he loves, so maybe he would want to stay in California. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 10, 2010, 09:46pm

06-09-10  10:18pm - 5310 days #6
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I know that it's more a case of entrapment because of how it all went down but the fact remains that he was found guilty and sentenced to prison.


Governments never seem to be very good at the what, when, where, and why, as long as they get the who right--in this case Max Hardcore. Back in the '30s the government could only convict Al Capone on tax evasion charges, not organized crime or murder, but they convicted him nonetheless. Hell, I bet if they ever caught Bin Laden they would only try him for crimes that occurred in the '90s, without even bringing up 9/11.

Max was convicted on transporting and shipping the 'obscenity' in question, not actually producing it, which I doubt would have gotten him imprisoned (though during the Bush II years I really would not have been that surprised). Saying something is one thing, and it's usually protected--that pesky 1st Amendment gets in the way--but transportation is a whole other issue, and in Max's case it was sadly a crime.

I don't think he was ever a specific target of the DOJ or anyone in the Bush II White House from the very beginning of the first term--maybe just in the backs of their minds--but once they pulled that Obscenity Prosecution Task Force out of their ass in 2005 they were probably looking for the more blatantly hardcore of the hardcore pornographers to charge and Max fit the bill. Playboy he is (was?) not! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 09, 2010, 10:24pm

06-09-10  07:30pm - 5310 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Max would need a country with poor relations with the U.S., and one that would also tolerate his producing porn, if he wants to produce porn safely. And then he would have to kiss his U.S. citizenship goodbye, because it could be "straight to jail" if he ever came back.

This is a case where it just doesn't pay to fight big government.


He just needs to find a country that's run by adults (hint: it would have to be outside the U.S.) who are rational, reasonable, smart, and, yes, grown up enough to realize porn is neither a 'moral' nor a 'value' problem, but simply something that many normal consenting adults enjoy around the world. If he starts shooting and producing in Europe then he only has to worry about the authorities there--and that would be relatively little worry in comparison to the U.S.--not the ones here who at most could seize his material in customs (so they could watch it over and over again for themselves... ).

His case makes me sick to my stomach, and not because of all the literal in his later videos (though that doesn't help) but because every time some asshole claims that terrorists hate us for our freedom or that we are the freest country on earth I then wonder why do we still waste our time investigating and prosecuting porn makers such as Max. Just make sure he's not working with underage talent and that everyone has given consent. Leave defining obscene to the media's 'experts' in their make-believe culture wars. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-10  12:05pm - 5310 days #8
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


I know my writing sometimes sorta runs off the page, and, admittedly undecipherable, but try again to grasp from my post that WE KNOW IT'S FANTASY BUT THEY APPARANTLY DON'T KNOW THAT WE KNOW...AND, IN FACT, THINK WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH SENSE TO KNOW IT.


Oh, they know we know, and, possibly more importantly, most of us know that they know that we know. Simple, right?

It's just a part of the overall veil of porn fantasy; they give us a little story and act, and we give them a little time, money, and never question the legitimacy of how some random (and frequently creepy) guys could just happen to meet hot women while their video camera is running, who are perfectly made up and shaved, and then take them back home for a half hour of fun (and, just by coincidence, in a place with great lighting for their video). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-10  11:56am - 5310 days #7
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The closest thing to reality porn I've seen are the casting videos by Pierre Woodman. That guy is amazing in his ability to persuade young girls to perform sex on camera.


I'd admit I am sometimes amazed by how many new/first time girls agree to work with one lucky guy, but on the other hand I seriously doubt he's giving them Monopoly money. I am sure if I started offering women money for sex (on camera, perfectly legal) then my luck would greatly improve. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 09, 2010, 07:12pm

06-08-10  01:47pm - 5311 days #8
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Sam Peckinpah's "The Wild Bunch" is one of my favorites, along with "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-08-10  04:26am - 5312 days #76
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


We're like the UN of porn.


Hmm...I certainly hope not. Okay, we clearly care about our respective favorite sites and genres, all while remaining powerless--maybe as much as the UN--but I would argue that we are even more civil. Nobody (at least that I know of, but we're online so what do I know?) starts banging their shoes on a table or walks out in anger and frustration, right? Of course we are given to writing out puffed up statements and speeches that really go nowhere, myself included.

There are probably also some countries who won't let their citizens be members, so we're not yet truly united! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 08, 2010, 01:56pm

06-07-10  01:53pm - 5312 days #74
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


[...]and people were creepy!


And we're not?!

Wow, thanks! Okay, maybe we don't exactly share in the least blasphemous of habits but we're really all angels here. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-07-10  01:47pm - 5312 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by james4096:


I love the Utah part. Not surprised at all. I heard they have a "porn czar" there to help enforce laws against pornography.


Apparently they had one from 2001 to 2003, but scrapped her job due to budget cuts. Gee, even I could have warned Utah going after porn was a waste of money. Not surprisingly the czar was a Mormon (but who in power isn't there?), though I guess it was never a conflict of interest. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-05-10  01:01pm - 5314 days #7
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


If we were lawyers opposing each other in a court of law, I think I'd be a little nervious.


Lol! Don't worry, I'm a terrible public speaker, plus I probably would go to the wrong courtroom, and if it was in the morning I doubt I'd even make it in to court.

Originally Posted by graymane1777:


Would you then say "cheating" is healthy?


Not necessarily, but then again my views are so out of whack I believe that marriage is not natural, nor even all that healthy for everyone out there. I just don't think we are as monogamous a species as some would like us believe. Needless to say I've never been married so I'm not exactly the go-to guy for advice in this area, just my . "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-05-10  01:36am - 5315 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


The arduous make-or-break babe chase for that elusive lay is replaced by the relaxed comfort of vicariously wallowing in your own ultimate sexual encounter right there emanating from your darling computer.
Imaginative success beats a hunt failure.


This may be true and prevents at least some from cheating but I wouldn't say it's very healthy. I would argue that reality is best suited for "your own ultimate sexual encounter" rather than porn, which should be for your own ultimate sexual fantasy. I'm not advocating people go out and cheat every time they come up with a new fantasy but if they are unhappy sexually in their relationships then neither porn nor maintaining the relationship as is are the best solutions.

I'm sure I'll get some well-deserved flak for this, but constantly resorting to porn may be a sign of a problem in some relationships. (Remember I said "may be" and "some," so please don't get too angry!) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-05-10  01:25am - 5315 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
It could also keep you from even starting a stable relationship--thus never having the chance to cheat--but that's really more of a personal problem, in my opinion. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-05-10  01:22am - 5315 days #20
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


Anyone here ever seen "9 Songs"? Not so much erotic as it was really, really interesting.


Oh, yes! I love that film; great pacing and score, all with tons of nudity and sex (and apparently not simulated either)! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 05, 2010, 01:06pm

06-04-10  11:51am - 5315 days #8
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by nostromo:


An american girl made a pass at me during Sunday School, Conifer, Colorado 1989.


If you keep saying something is a forbidden fruit you're eventually going to get a lot of people interested.

But what can I say? Reminds me of a Red Hot Chili Peppers song; "Catholic School Girls Rule"! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 04, 2010, 11:55am

06-04-10  01:06am - 5316 days #21
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


It was a joke TS.


Yeah, I know, but your second statement, "we dump all our money into saving banks and oil company fuck-ups," was actually, sadly, very true.

Oh, the good ol' days, when we were only trying to stop the enormous flood of porn. Fortunately they never figured out how to stop that gusher either. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 07, 2010, 02:14pm

06-04-10  12:55am - 5316 days #15
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by nostromo:


This thread makes me think of april flowers obsessively


I think she's retired from dirty movies, so you're probably going to have to start your own site if you want to see her again.

I read that she was from Wasilla, Alaska--just like Sarah Palin--so maybe she can run for vice president in 2016. She's certainly got my vote! Hell, I'll do a write-in now! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-04-10  12:48am - 5316 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Thanks, WG, these really put a smile on my face.

Some interesting and funny stats, whether or not they are even remotely accurate;

- Over $3,000 every second?! And nearly $5 billion worldwide, with half of that in the U.S.? I sure hope there's an economist or two somewhere deep in an office who make sure that the porn revenues keep flowing because that sounds crucial to our economic stability. And where the hell is the porn industry's bailout? I've kept some of my porn longer than many people have kept their crappy cars!

- 40 million Americans are "regular visitors" to porn sites. Million? So shouldn't PU be much, much larger than it currently is? At least by a couple million, though that would probably require like ten Khans and I'm not even sure he would consent to being cloned.

- The Thanksgiving thing I can understand because the last thing I want to do after choking down some turkey and stuffing whilst hanging out with my family is look at porn. I prefer a strong dose of NyQuil and an early bedtime. That and maybe a lot of people are traveling and it's really hard to watch porn and drive at the same time or even fly in a plane without getting hassled by a stewardess (just check out the link in my sig).

- Sunday is the most popular day of the week? Well, it is the day of rest... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 06, 2010, 03:22pm

06-04-10  12:29am - 5316 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


For instance, in #8 I wouldn't consider "adult dating" to be porn.


Yeah, isn't that what people do as an alternative to porn? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-04-10  12:21am - 5316 days #70
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


If you go through the forum posts you'll find plenty of discussions regarding porn collections. People here have plenty to say about it!


He's not kidding, there really are a huge number of threads about our collections, purduerachel. We are way too open about what we collect, how we collect, organize, store...

Just remember: there's no accounting for taste! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-04-10  12:14am - 5316 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Well...I'll chime in with my usual cheery tone and say American society and culture are not exactly on the side of women and sex, so not all the blame should be placed on our girls. We demonize and politicize sex in a way that probably makes some Muslim countries think "Son of a bitch! Why didn't we think of that?!"

Seriously, there are school districts in the U.S. that teach abstinence-only sex education (which I think technically means it is not even sex education). If governments cannot even acknowledge basic human biology, especially concerning one of our pressing urges--you know, fucking--than I don't think as many women are ultimately going to be as forward, even if they wish to be. Zero tolerance is zero thinking, in my view, and that's how we have approached s-e-x for so long in this country that it's a wonder the suicide rate isn't higher.

Like you mentioned, graymane, religion has played a huge, shameful role, dismissing and suppressing sex as sinful and dirty rather than natural and normal. It also plays a role in sex education, birth control, abortion, or the lack thereof. Europe still has religion, it just doesn't use it to legislate or run the government the way we do.

Fortunately a lot of women are smarter than the prudes in charge, and they're making their way, regardless of a society and culture that's still has a way to go. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 04, 2010, 12:25am

06-02-10  07:23am - 5318 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Over here in the States we have out priorities straight -- we dump all our money into saving banks and oil company fuck-ups.


Not true, Goldfish. The Bush Administration had the Justice Department create the "Obscenity Prosecution Task Force" back in 2005 to go after those no-good pornographers and their evil, sinful products. Look what happened with Max Hardcore and now Evil Angel. You'd would think after the horror of 9/11 the leaders of the 'greatest country on earth' might have bigger legal priorities than wasting time in the perpetual gray area of defining 'obscenity'.

But, yes, we are now diverting our attention to financial institution bailouts and fucking up the environment--in other words, business as usual. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-01-10  09:52am - 5318 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Man, what is this world coming to? You get arrested for working for AW? Unbelievable!

I'm sorry to hear that you were arrested and the raid last year led to so much legal trouble. I remember when we were talking about it last summer in the forum and on the AW review page comments but I kinda forgot about it for a while, and now... Maybe they went after you because you were doing pretty well--talk about being a victim of your own success!

Amsterdam makes the most sense when it comes to making porn, if you could even call AW that since, relatively speaking, your material is pretty soft when compared to what people dream up and release on 'net. I guess the U.S. wasn't the best place either, with tons of competition and a lot of stupid laws to boot. Plus I don't think you would be able to quite so easily find the types of girls you traditionally shot. Here it seems to be either porn star wannabes or girls gone wild delinquents, leaving the true amateur to be somewhat of an enigma in the porn world.

Best of luck in your new location and I hope it works out for everyone involved (except prudish lawmakers).

Maybe we really are in a wild west age of the Internet where a relatively free country like Australia gets so serious about cracking down on porn and inevitably the law will reach every corner of the globe. Our recent poll about whether online porn will ever be outlawed makes me think PU'ers might have been a little too optimistic in their responses. Or maybe this is just a fluke from Australian law and they will eventually grow up and understand 'freedom' is not just an empty phrase. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-01-10  09:28am - 5319 days #53
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


by the way...don't use amazon forums! i posted it and people are tearing it up and being really really mean!!!


I'm not surprised considering how angry people get just doing reviews and comments on Amazon. I guess as long as people think they are anonymous the sky's the limit on cruelty. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-31-10  10:08am - 5319 days #20
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Do lesbians actually not like the girl on girl scenes in "regular" porn? I've known lesbians but none well enough to ask.

Has anyone ever met a straight woman who enjoys guy on guy porn? I've discussed the whole lesbian porn thing with a few women and they don't seem to have a similar taste for seeing to members of the opposite sex.


I never said they didn't like it, but I would think they might prefer something a little more 'genuine' that what we guys are dreaming up. And let's face it; I don't think most male porn producers are creating girl-girl videos for lesbians. I honestly don't know what lesbians would truly prefer in their porn, but it seems insulting and arrogant to think that a bunch of straight men would have the answer, whether they are shooting a scene or, yes, even contributing to PU.

Your second statement is definitely a big difference I notice between men and women. Why we are we so open to the notion that all straight women are really raging bisexuals at heart is beyond me (and probably most evolutionary biologists as well), but they don't seem to have the even remotely same ideas, like "Hey, how 'bout you and your guy friends start making out and have a big orgy. Yeah, that'd be hot." No, I haven't yet met any women who think like that. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-30-10  11:30pm - 5320 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I can understand why the women get more because they are what is in demand, whereas the guy is basically a walking hard-on. I do agree that the guy has the harder job with being able to get hard, stay hard, and then eventually and relatively reliably shoot on command, all on camera in front of a nearly all male crew. I'm sure it's fun if you know what you're doing and you can perform under pressure multiple days of the week.

Guys seem to stay in the business a relatively long time compared to women, especially since age isn't as important as it is for women. Quite a few of them seem to hook up with and even marry female stars which makes sense as well because they could understand each others day jobs, not to mention filing jointly on their taxes. I wonder what they put under occupation, 'adult entertainer'? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-30-10  12:24pm - 5320 days #15
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I agree, condom use is a total turn-off for me. I watch porn for fantasy not reality, and condoms are just another part of reality creeping their way in to piss me off and ruin my day. In the world of porn everybody seems to be enjoying themselves equally, the guy frequently gets to partner with more than one woman, the couch/carpet/ceiling is ruined with reckless abandon, and no condoms have to be used--all part of the crazy, wonderful fantasy I get to enjoy as viewer.

Granted, special effects in porn, well, don't actually exist and the risks performers take on screen are quite real but life is full of risks and these people are fully aware of that. If they actually had a strict condoms-only policy they wouldn't be in the business because I don't think the business could survive on such a model. I also don't think the business is there to truly serve the customers but instead serve their bottom lines, though customer demands do make their way into things and it's why we don't see burning rubber.

I will admit that for a pet peeve condom use should be at the bottom of the list, but it's not. What the guy has wrapped around his penis is not really my concern, I mean I don't stop the video if he has genital piercing, so why do I get upset about the condoms? Again it's the fantasy aspect and a prejudice I probably won't give up anytime soon either. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-30-10  12:01pm - 5320 days #15
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I'm not gay, so why should I even care? I hope that doesn't offend anyone.


I don't think it would. To paraphrase Ed2009 somewhat, indifference is not the same as being scared of something.

In fact if much of the media and politics were indifferent I don't think sexuality would be an issue, especially homosexuality. But in their eyes it clearly is an issue because, well, it just is, not that there's anything wrong with it, they just need to discuss and debate it fucking endlessly. It seems every time some celebrity of at least marginal importance comes out a number of magazines have to do a cover story "Holy Shit! He/she's gay! And that's okay, but buy our magazine anyway where we discuss it as if it's not."

And then there are the politicians, those oh so great leaders we have faithfully and dutifully entrusted with our votes to represent us...

Yeah, indifference would be nice. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-30-10  11:51am - 5320 days #14
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


As to the rest of your remarks, I completely agree with you about the "discomfort" factor when it comes to gay material (excluding Lesbians).


I would argue that none of us actually watch true lesbian porn, but more accurately girl-girl porn. I would bet many lesbians would not be as interested or as turned on as we are by the 'lesbian' porn we enjoy, given that it's made by guys for guys with bisexual or very open-minded heterosexual women as the actresses. I remember watching a little bit of lesbian porn (it was specifically made for lesbians by a lesbian cast and crew) and thinking something like "This is boring! When are they going to start really going at it? And what's with all the kissing?" Clearly I was not part of the target audience.

I think the girl-girl/'lesbian' material we guys like is not really homosexual and that's why most guys are comfortable watching it. We view it as just another porn video because we are ogling the opposite sex, if only a few more of them in the same place at the same time--convenient! Add in the factor that you have seen some of the actresses in guy-girl videos as well and you realize it's just horny guy fantasy material, not exactly what any lesbian would care to see. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-26-10  10:04pm - 5324 days #150
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


"It too often mistakes shock value for real humor, but MacGruber is better than many SNL films -- and better than it probably should be".


These SNl sketch films always seem to scrape the bottom of the humor barrel, and I think the idea of taking a five minute sketch--which is frequently too long already--and extending the joke to ninety minutes of film is just dumb. I'm not even sure how you could stretch the MacGruber character to feature length because the whole joke was that he was such an idiot that his diddling and dawdling would get him killed within the few minutes of the sketch, usually with the time running out being the joke's setup.

Why they keep making SNL sketches into films is beyond me. The actors in non-sketch film roles can do reasonably well but wearing their character out for an hour and a half is too much. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-26-10  09:40pm - 5324 days #34
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Here's an argument for you. The food chain is part of nature. One species fucking another species is not something you come across a lot in the natural order of things.


It might happen more than you think. Domestic dogs have been known to breed with coyotes and wolves, at least where they are in close enough proximity to do so (on or around ranches in the American west, for example).

Other animals species can be interbred as well, though it usually seems to be the result of human interference (I guess the same problem with the subject of this thread...), like the mule, which is made from a male donkey and a female horse. There has even been recent evidence from DNA studies that early humans bred with Neanderthals, though I am guessing difference of appearance at the time was not great enough to make the Homo sapiens or neanderthalensis stop from crossing the species line.

Today though humans don't have any other species with which we can interbreed, so when we try...well, just read the thread. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-26-10  08:57pm - 5324 days #34
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I think the main reasons why so many celebrities have come out as sex addicts is because they are hoping to save serious money during the inevitable divorce. They figure that having their conditions diagnozed has a disease is a possible path to get away with it. What the hell it's worked for drug addict& alcoholics. How many celebrities have gotten off easy because they claimed somekind of addiction? Lindsay comes to mind at the moment.


I definitely agree with you here, pat362, and if it's not to head off a pricey divorce/separation (for celebrities it seems to get expensive even if they were never married) then they most likely looking to take the blame off their poor, poor shoulders, in my opinion. "Oh, I have an addiction/disease/lifelong illness, so it's really not my problem."

I would be amazed if a celebrity ever came out and just said "Uh, I fucked up; I got a bunch of money and fame and started to have fun. It's not a disease. It's not an addiction. It's me and that's it." Many of us here at PU--myself included--are pretty skeptical of something being labeled an 'addiction.' It not only misplaces blame but it also implies the existence of a 'cure,' usually offered by some asshole with an ulterior motive behind his back. For example, many of those who offer to 'treat' sex addiction--assuming it is even an addiction to begin with--do so with a religious clause attached. Seems to me you're just replacing one diversion with another, and it's probably a lot less fulfilling and fun!

Originally Posted by pat362:


There was an article in Newsweek recently that made a correlation between addiction to tanning beds & substance abuse. It basically said that people that are addicted to tanning beds are more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol.


If you ask me, somebody would have be abusing drugs or alcohol to even use a tanning bed. It would be like me paying the Russians to go hang out around Chernobyl for a while, just because I thought it improved my looks!

Not quite sure how you could even be addicted to tanning beds... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 26, 2010, 09:02pm

05-25-10  06:57pm - 5325 days #34
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Ah, Henry Miller, he's one of the authors who sent an impressionable young mind down the wrong garden path (thanks, Henry.)

Many a happy hour was spent with his books!


I am sure many an hour was...

I wonder if had he been alive today with Internet and its vast, vast offering of porn if he would be able to get any writing done. He'd probably be an online sex columnist or blogger. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  06:45pm - 5325 days #27
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


... and people wonder why submariners eagerly enlist to spend months underwater with 100+ guys


(Okay, I know I just said that this thread should be put down but this is a little ...)

It's interesting you mention that, Wittyguy, because the U.S. Navy recently mentioned allowing women to serve on submarines starting sometime next year (I have to say this administration is great at making decisions that will only take effect sometime in the future, exact dates to be determined). The military services are not exactly known for their sterling egalitarianism but gender-separated jobs and duties seem to written in stone for at least all of the different branches. You would think that because modern atomic submarines can stay submerged for so long--some even armed with nuclear weapons--in the event of a large nuclear conflict they may end up carrying the last living humans on earth and you would want at least a few healthy females with them in order to 'restart' the species.

Just a thought. Possibly a brain . "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  06:32pm - 5325 days #26
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Some of us have been here for a awhile, but the smileys are pretty new to all of us as we only got them a few weeks ago. They certainly seem to help to emphasize sarcasm and humor in order to avoid an angry forum, though we do pride ourselves on our civility (relative to the usual 'net standards). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  06:27pm - 5325 days #25
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Tell the truth, up to the time this thread was started I had never looked at sex between humans and animals as anything but a perversion. To see it called "animal abuse" is startling to me, to say the least. My dictionary calls this type of view: anthropomorphism.

If I cared that much about animals' emotional well-being I could not, in good conscience, eat that next pork chop.


It's a perversion--though there are probably arguments for that being good and arguments for that being bad--but people also see it as animal abuse probably because of the type of animals involved. Not to go into too much detail, but when most people talk about bestiality they seem to be talking about animals that people usually own as pets or for recreation so that's why it's seen as abuse in addition to the perversion aspect--they certainly would not want someone doing that to the animals they own.

There are obviously a lot of double standards when it comes to animal treatment; people 'love' their dog or cat or whatever (non-sexually!) but have no trouble gobbling down a large steak or chicken for dinner. The affection people have for their pets is not seen as anthropomorphism, just simple caring (again, non-sexual).

Now is it just me, or do we need to put this thread to sleep? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  01:40pm - 5325 days #29
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
You have a point, Wittyguy, but you still need to look under the hood every now and then. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  01:34pm - 5325 days #27
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


You got a way with words, Drooler....ever think of writing romance novels?


Yes, he does have quite a way with words--PU's current poet of porn! "Pussy as a cup"...take that, Walt Whitman! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  01:22pm - 5325 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I imagine the reason bestiality is not more widespread is simply the size (or lack thereof) of the fan base and the laws in place. Granted it's already illegal to produce even the softest of soft porn in most of the U.S. but producing/selling/buying bestiality porn seems to be fairly taboo even before people start talking about the law. Besides the 'disturbing' factor a lot of people view it as a form of animal abuse since animals cannot give consent--though we seem to do pretty much every other cruel act imaginable to animals with no qualms at all.

Graymane1777, though you're certainly entitled to your opinion, I would say there is a big difference between the taboo of anal sex and the taboo of changing species. Still there are plenty of prudes out there that think that any type of sex (between humans) is disturbing and 'evil' so the thought of anal sex probably freaks them out more than bestiality does to others. Anal sex used to be fairly taboo within porn--maybe not as much as animal fucking, but it was pretty rare at one time--but it's now so common that it's almost more unusual not to see it. Maybe the industry will regress and make anal rare again... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-10  01:04pm - 5325 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


...but just the other day i was at the bars with some friends and one of the guys thought it was funny to show a porn slide show on his phone...it was a girl fucking a donkey.


And people think sexting is the worst thing being done with phones... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-24-10  05:05pm - 5326 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


It might interest you to know I'll take all the facial closeups they'll give me, and then some (an' I ain't talkin' bout the cum-shots , for sanity sake)


No, I didn't think you were either. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-24-10  12:46pm - 5326 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Missionary is probably not best for shooting; it can get boring for viewers and, yes, the camera has trouble 'getting in there' and capturing the details, so you don't see it all that often. And even when you do see it you can still get a hefty dose of man ass! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 24, 2010, 01:01pm

05-24-10  12:42pm - 5326 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I took the survey; it's anonymous and actually quite interesting, especially if you spend a lot of time online without ever realizing how much time you actually spend online.

Best of luck, purduerachel! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-24-10  12:26pm - 5326 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Well, I guess I'm going to have to be the odd man out (or just plain odd) and say I generally like a lot of (female) closeups, though not a 100% of the time. Yes, I like faces, breasts, legs, etc., but I'm only human and I want to feel as if I am getting my money's worth, so to speak. They are not always nice though, and a bad shave job, or a shave job gone bad, is what ruins closeups more than anything else for me--oh, and the evil of hairy man ass! So I stick to the more all-girl content and delete the ones with five o'clock shadows.

I say if the models agree to it, knowing there will be closeups--which should be evident when the cameramen are only a couple of inches away--and they are comfortable with it, what's the problem? There's obviously a demand, like so many of the other things that we treat as pet peeves here at PU, so they are going to keep shooting it. Plus there is plenty to choose from in porn, from the doctor's point of view to the more artistic, oh-she's-not-just-a-vagina content, and sites seem to usually make it relatively clear if they lean the way of an OB-GYN in their material. I have found that if a site has closeups in it, then they are not going to keep it a secret but instead use it as a selling point (can't say I blame them either).

But c'mon, if it ain't Playboy, then I don't want sites and companies thinking they can act like them and shoot super soft, Photoshopped/airbrushed crap. Sorry, but I pay for porn that is truly porn, if I want something softer I'll turn on MTV! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-24-10  12:03pm - 5326 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


Matter of fact, we have to endure way too much hairy-ass closeups of guys too.


Stick to girl only or girl-girl content and this shouldn't be a problem. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-24-10  01:23am - 5327 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
To be honest I just don't have the attention span for a six-to-twelve month long subscription. I prefer to cancel and then come back in a few months to a year and see what I have missed. It's a lot of fun!

That and I just don't get all hot and bothered over updates. For some reason I have never been very excited about 'coming attractions' as I am usually disappointed and let down by the hype--hey, just like life! I either prejudge things too much, thinking they will be really great, or just ignore them all together and focus on what is currently available.

And for reasons having nothing to do with the economy, I may also have serious commitment issues... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

1201-1250 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 24 Page 25 26 29 32 35 39 40 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.