|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
pat362 (0)
|
751-800 of 3575 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 15 | Page 16 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 41 | 49 | 57 | 71 | 72 | Next Page > |
03-27-14 05:56pm - 3924 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
In this case the promo code is useless since their current join price is at 50% discount but I personally think that it is just marketing BS on their part because no one would have paid 30$ to watch their few scenes. Especially when Jules Jordan has already released a Maddy anal scene and 2 Annika anal scenes so all Hard-X can say is that they have the first anal scene both women shot but definitely not the first one released to the net. This site is exactly what I thought it would be and sadly I can't see it surviving long term as a stand alone site. There is simply not enough content to satisfy most porn fans and since they are only an extension of a porn studio still releasing their stuff on dvd first and not that much content then it will take them years before they have a decent library of scenes to make this site worth joining. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-26-14 06:22pm - 3925 days | #7 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
The only site that I know does this is Kink's hardcore gangbang. I don't know why they do that but it's clear to anyone who as been a member that the shoot is dedicated to the woman. I honestly don't know why they do but I did find a pattern in the order. If Tommy Pistol is in the scene than his name is usually the first one out of all the performers (including the woman). I did see a couple of exception where his name was after the woman and in a shoot last November Steven St-Croix had top billing but that could be because he was a well respected performer in the past. John Strong would also be a performer that gets top billing at Kink's HG except if he is shooting with Tommy and then Tommy is number one. Maybe they are contract players for Kink? Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-26-14 05:57pm - 3925 days | #32 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I don't think he was posting that in the right forum and I should know because I've been on a couple of others in the last few years and none compare to PU. Just the civility makes it a one of a kind but the shear writing talent of many posters takes it to an even higher level. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-24-14 05:09pm - 3927 days | #2 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
And they say romance is dead. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-24-14 05:08pm - 3927 days | #9 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I have seen one gif showing Max at his old self holding Bonnies head during the BJ and she's vomiting all over his crotch and anyone can see screen caps of the scene but good luck finding the video itself. I believe that you could at one time but the powers that be have taken them down. I don't know why that scene was never released on Max's own site but I know it isn't. It was supposed to be part of a new Max movie called Fuck Puppet 2 but that never happened. I have my theory as to why but it's pure speculation so not worth mentioning. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-24-14 04:51pm - 3927 days | #11 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I agree but since so many American universities make their money off their various sports team then it make sense that a winning coach would be something you'd want to keep as happy as possible for fear of losing him to another school. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-23-14 05:49pm - 3928 days | #7 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
The only legal place where you can find LP's ticket based content is on their site and nowhere else. Their so called free stuff can partially be found on VB under Sineplex and the 2 Sinsational studios. They currently have 178 movies and or 818 scenes. Not sure if VB is still adding new movies under these studios but I seriously doubt it as the last date I saw on one of their videos is 2012 and that sounds about right when it comes to the birth of LP. Giorgio is a very different thing but the news is in many ways worse because he shot for so many studios that there is no single site that will give you full access to his stuff. I'd also like to add that I am pretty sure that stuff that is not identified as by shot by him is still stuff he shot. Since TBP/PU no longer do business with no rest for the ass than no way to join through us but you can Google it and you will see the site is still active but I must warn you that you may regret joining that site. There is often a really good reasons why TBP decides to no longer business with some sites and it's not wise to overlook that. If you're into extreme lesbian porn than huge strapon lesbian is likely a site that he produced porn for because all the scenes look like his stuff. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-23-14 05:25pm - 3928 days | #6 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I read an interesting article about Belle a couple of days ago and the end of the article is something that I hadn't actually thought of but which makes a lot of sense and makes Belle's decision to do porn really dumb. The article put forward that if Belle is telling the truth (no reason not to believe her) then she needs 60,000$ each year for tuition and she will probably have to attend Duke for 4 years to get her diploma so that means she needs at least 240,000$ to finish university. The general consensus is that she was getting about 1200$ for one scene so basically Belle will have to shoot 200 porn scenes to earn enough for her education. That is never going to happen and I can't see too many organisation willing to give her a scholarship. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-23-14 05:15pm - 3928 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^No it has never been released and since it's a couple of years old now than it likely never will. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-23-14 09:19am - 3929 days | #2 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Let me say from the get go that I'm not opposed to a few tattoos on a woman but there comes a point where a woman can have so many that I can't enjoy her or her choice of positioning is such that it distracts from her overall beauty. Bonnie I my opinion has way too many tattoos from me to ever enjoy her. Now that I've said that then let's see if I can still be objective on the subject. Elegant Angel was sold last year which is usually not good news for a studio because it means that it was either losing money or was about to lose a lot of it. Not sure who bought them but all their top directors left the studio so it's all new blood working for them and that tends to mean subpar material coming out in the beginning. I suspect that you're a fan of squirting but that fetish is more or less dead as less and less people are interested in water sports porn. The fact that a well respected studio chose to resurrect a dead series after a 6 year hiatus doesn't bode well for their thinking. I know you are a fan of Bonnie and I know she has her fans but her choice of body art sort of means that she is far from natural looking and sadly the vast majority of fans prefer their models to look as natural as possible. I know she likes to shoot some extreme type of porn and that makes her more popular but I can't see how she can gather enough fans willing to both see her do porn and do water sport porn. I fear that this latest gimmick from Elegant Angel is just another sign that their days of glory are behind them and we shouldn't expect much in the months or years to come. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-23-14 08:54am - 3929 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
LP (Legal Porno) is the site that has risen from the ashes that were Sineplex, Sinsational and a few other studios. There is also a couple of porn producers that have migrated to them. Not the least of which is a guy called Giorgio Grandi. Anyone familiar with the more extreme style of Eastern European porn has seen some of his movies because he shot for many studios other than his own. I don't know how many people will remember a site called no rest for the ass. It's no longer listed on TBP/PU so you would think that it's dead but it's still active and still robbing people of their hard earned money by pretending to still be active. In fact LP is in many ways doing the same thing except they are still updating with new content. Here is what you need to know about LP. It's a token based system where you need tickets to buy a large portion of their library. Some scenes only cost one ticket but some can cost as much as 8 tickets. You can either join the site for a minimum 30$ and that will give you access to their free stuff(I'll get to that later on) and it also gives you 35 tickets that you can use to purchase scenes. You can forgo the membership and simply buy tickets but you don't get the free stuff you'll have to spend 38$ to get 30 tickets so not as good a deal as the membership. Now in regards to the type of porn you will find on LP. It's primarily gonzo porn with a major emphasis on circus style porn. In case you don't know what that is then it's basically gonzo porn where the girl is normally expected to be pile driven by huge dicks and toys in all her orifices repeatedly in a wide variety of less and less comfortable positions with multiple shots of the girls gaping holes and where passion is not a word that is used. These guys are the masters of European circus porn so if you like that then you will love these guys. Most of their scenes are shot in a bright white room and on a white couch so that girls who already look pale now look even more so. I think these guys go out of their way to make sure that a beautiful woman will look as drab as possible. Glamorous will never be a word associated with them. I dare anyone to point me to one of their scenes where the performer is made to look as beautiful as I know she is. Their ticket system is already a scam for me because a site that charges for a monthly membership should offer it's members access to their entire library and not make them pay even more but it gets worse. You'd think that since they have a ticket based system that it would only apply to their most recent stuff and you are partially right because any update that is 2 years and older winds up in the free section but that 2 year limit is for when it was uploaded and not production date. There are tons of videos that are significantly older than 2 years. I found one that was at least 5 years old in the ticket section of the site because it was uploaded in December of 2012 but actually made in 2009. Now about the free stuff. There are over 1500 videos in the section but many of these are not exclusive to this site because they are for the most part taken from Sineplex and Sinsational movies that can be found on VB and since both studios really stopped producing movies a few years ago than they are old and getting older. Finally the cherry on top of this turd flavored sundae. You can buy only tickets to download their videos or join the site for 1, 2 or 3 months but no matter which option you pick. There is till one thing you need to do before downloading a video. You need to authorise the site to charge you an unknown amount on your credit card and then verify with your bank or CC company to find out what that amount was so that you can enter it in their system. Yes you read that correctly. You are confirming a charge without actually knowing what it is. They write on their site that the amount is between 20 cents and 2$ but who's to stop them from charging any amount they want since you didn't actually see it prior to accepting their terms. They say they do it to make sure that it's your card and not a stolen one but that explanation is so stupid that it borders on the insane because to get that request means that you have to have already bought tickets or actually joined the site. Any site with such a strict policy would make sure to do it prior to the person joining the site so that you have the legitimate person buying something. What I get from this type of policy is a way for the site to make money from people joining who refuse to let the site charge an unknown amount on their card and still gets money from people that stole the card in the first place but can't actually partake of the site . Now in case anyone is thinking that I'm making this up then let me assure you that I am one of the suckers who joined this site earlier this year and I refused to get an unknown amount charged on my card. I contacted their support center the moment I tried to download one of the ticket based scenes and found out I couldn't until I jumped through hoops for them. I might have downloaded some of their free scenes but for whatever reason I was never able to get beyond the first page so I didn't download a single thing from the site and I told the support person all of that and I told him to simply cancel my membership and credit me for the full amount. His answer was that he couldn't do that because I had legitimately joined the site so the best the (fucker) gentleman could do was credit me 10$. That's right. I was a member for less than one hour, didn't download a single thing and all I was entitled to was 10$ from my original membership of 30$. Needless to say I hope these guys go out of business. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-22-14 09:59am - 3929 days | #11 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
1-Win7 2-I use IE 10 for about 85% of my surfing. 3-Firefox is the other browser that I use. 4-I love Win 7 so no plans to change for a long time to come. I like(but not love) IE10 so no plans to change except to a better version of IE and the same for Firefox. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-19-14 05:53pm - 3932 days | #13 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^Yeah I think that's like saying that Brazzer is Canadian because Manwin was at one point sort of a Canadian Company. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-17-14 11:13am - 3934 days | #8 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I was aware of this story because I posted something in another forum. I should have made a thread here but it's a little embarrassing and frankly stupid what is happening. The reality is that I don't believe it's possible for any Canadian porn site to have 35% all Canadian content. At least not good content. I'm sure we could find plenty of solo model sites but there isn't really a porn industry in Canada. Quebec had a small one but I certainly haven't heard anything coming out of Quebec in a long time. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-14-14 10:01am - 3937 days | #9 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I say with all honesty that thanks are not needed. If I never get anything else out of my time on PU. I can't take comfort that I got to interact with some truly amazing people like you and many other on this forum and that is worth more than anything else. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-14-14 08:38am - 3938 days | #1213 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I suspect the vast majority of all war movies have their inaccuracies and/or bias and that is fine as long as they don't try to completely rewrite history. If you want to see historical events depicted with the most accuracy as possible then stick to documentaries. Not that some of these aren't guilty of rewriting history but the better ones don't. I don't have a big hatred for Affleck. I don't think he's a very good actor but the same can be said for so many other actors that it's hard to point to him and say that he's worse than other actors. I think the one word that best describe Affleck's acting talent is bland. He's the white bread of actors. That's why I think he was great in Pearl Harbor because no one should outshine all the slow motion shots and explosions in a Bay movie. Otherwise the director will be pissed at you. Affleck seems to be a decent director but that's based on what I read since I have never actually seen any of his movies. He has certainly managed to do serious cash from other things than his acting. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-13-14 06:06pm - 3938 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Thank You for sharing what is happening in your life. I wish I could say that I know what you are going through because at least I might have some suggestion for you but I have so far been very lucky when it comes to health issues. Most of my ealth issues all happened prior to becoming a teenager so I have time on my side to give me perspective and help me forget. I hope you heal completely but if you can't get that then at least that you regain a semblance of normalness and see a disappearance of the pain. I know saying hang in there is a small comfort but I still say it. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-13-14 05:55pm - 3938 days | #6 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
This and Old Montreal is where The Cirque du Soleil was born when Guy Laliberté started recruiting some of these street artists. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-13-14 09:26am - 3938 days | #1211 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I was thinking the same thing when I read that but didn't want to go look for an answer to confirm it but I suspect that he was closer to historical history only because it's mostly a love story centered around a very long battle scene and Bay would want to be as accurate as possible on the battle scene. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-12-14 06:41pm - 3939 days | #1208 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I agree that most movies or TV shows that use time travel in their main plot tend to screw it up pretty badly but most of the past ones used a certain logic while a recent movie completely take a dump on the audience. I give you. JJ Abrams Stark Trek. You want a fucked up time travel plot then here is one. The main reason why the bad guy is pissed at the universe is because the Federation with the help of the Vulcans was not able to save his world so he winds up in the past and is in a position to both make his people technologically superior to every other race in the galaxy but also save them all from certain disaster. No our hero instead attacks a Federation starship because they reveal to him that he is in the exact position he would want to be to save his now dead people. Then there is a huge 25 year gap where he disappears without a trace and that is never explained. It was sort of explained if you watched deleted content that he was captured by Klingons and has been imprisoned all that time but that makes even less sense when you consider that it's revealed in a key element of the film that Uhura heard that he destroyed an entire fleet of Klingon ships. Where was his vessel while he was being imprisoned? I'd add Looper to the list of guilty as charged but it's such a fucked up time travel plot that I can't get my head around all the twist and turns the creators took in this movie. Let's just say that the protagonist killing himself in the present should have made it impossible for his old self to even exist and therefore the movie should never have existed. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-12-14 09:57am - 3939 days | #1205 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^Is it possible that being an American makes you a little bias on the subject and I'd like to add that the fact that American movies are rewriting history doesn't negatively affect Americans. There is now an entire generation of Americans who believe that Argo is the truth and therefore Canada's part in the Iranian incident is but a bookmark in the history book but the opposite is the truth. Just read what President Carter said on the subject. In a CNN interview, former U.S. president Jimmy Carter addressed the controversy: "90% of the contributions to the ideas and the consummation of the plan was Canadian. And the movie gives almost full credit to the American CIA. And with that exception, the movie is very good. But Ben Affleck's character in the film was... only in Tehran a day and a half. And the main hero, in my opinion, was Ken Taylor, who was the Canadian ambassador who orchestrated the entire process."[47] Don't get me wrong. I completely understand why Hollywood went the way they did because American audiences would never have watched a movie where the heroes are Canadians. You want another example of where Hollywood rewrote history in favor of the US. How about U-571. It's a great movie but the historical accuracy is way way off on this one. Yeah the Americans did capture an Enigma machine but it was in 1944 which is about 12 years after the first one was captured and the British navy had already captured 13 prior to the Americans getting their hands on one. Probably the main reason why I avoid any movie that has the words "based on a true story" is because all it usually mean is that most of the story is BS with a sprinkling of truth. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-11-14 06:23pm - 3940 days | #1202 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I often take my nephew with me because we're the only two in the family who like science fiction/fantasy movies so 2 tickets for a standard movie comes out to about 21$ because he's still only 13. If the movie is in 3D then that number is closer to 25$ and if it's in the new AVX theater then we are talking over 26$. I get scene point that accumulate and I get one free movie for every 10 that I see. If we both have a slushie and a large popcorn then that's another 14$ and that's because my scene card gives me a 10% discount at the counter. The cost of going to the movies is getting to be so high that I now really try to make sure that I will enjoy the movie otherwise an average movie will be more disappointing because it cost so much to see it. Of course it's hard to argue that some movies are so much better when seen on a large movie screen. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-11-14 06:12pm - 3940 days | #1201 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^Monument Men didn't get very good reviews on RT and that is part of why I didn't go see it. The other reason is that I don't think it needs to be told on the big screen. There is a documentary about the real life Monument Men coming soon and that is a far better medium for these types of movies. I don't want to offend my American friends but I find that most Americans can't tell a true story without rewriting it in such a way that Americans become the heroes of those stories. Now when it's not an historical story then that isn't much of an issue but it's an altogether different thing when an American movie decides to rewrite history by inserting Americans in the place of the real heroes. I know they do it to help sell the movie to Americans but it doesn't make it right. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-11-14 10:07am - 3940 days | #1198 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
It's been such a long time since I have been to the movies that I didn't actually remember the last ones I saw. I had to look it up and it was 47 Ronin and the latest Hobbit movie. The first one was a gigantic turd that anyone with brains should avoid while the other was not bad but then again not great. I was interested in seeing I, Frankenstein in January but it got so many horrendous reviews on RT(Rotten Tomatoes) that I skipped spending 12$ for a movie that I will probably buy on dvd. My wish list for February was bigger because it included The Lego movie, 3 days to kill, Pompeii, Winter's tale and Non-Stop. Of these only the Lego movie will probably make it on my buy list when it comes to dvd/Blu-ray because the reviews for all the others aren't stellar or are just bad. I had better luck with my video purchases but I still wound up buying movies that I wanted to see in theater but chose not to or was unable to see. I bought Riddick and it was okay but it felt too much like a mixture of the first two movies and the ending was not that good, Escape Plan was okay but should remain a rental and Thor 2 which I was so sure would be as good as the first if not better but it was actually very disappointing on all fronts. All is not lost because Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2 was very good and well worth a buy for me and a rental for anybody else. Catching Fire was excellent and if you already have Hunger Games than get this one and my last great purchase is Ender's Game. That is an amazing movie with some great acting from the main star as well as the other players. I know that there are other novels in the series but I don't think they will wind up on screen if only because I can't how they could bring them to the screen. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-11-14 09:34am - 3940 days | #1197 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I'm a bit late in replying to your question so sorry about that. I still go to a movie theater about once a month but I can go more than one month without going to the movies in part because I'm finding that I just don't enjoy the stuff most studios put out these days. That and the fact that I buy so many movies on DVD/Blu-ray and I only have to wait a few weeks to a couple of months before a new release winds up on video that I'll wait for the video. If I really like a movie than I will watch it multiple times and I may even watch it a few times if it's average. My only problem with doing that is that I take for granted that the movie will appeal when in fact it won't. See my next post for some examples. I didn't know that she dated Larry but I have to agree that Angie was a really hot woman. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-11-14 09:15am - 3941 days | #13 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I don't have anything better to offer than what the others have said except to say that this is a good warning to all those people that download large amounts of content without first picking and choosing to limit the amount of content you have to delete. I have a 2TB drive full of porn and I need to get in there to do some clean up because the drive is full and I know that there is stuff on it that I will never watch again. that and stuff that is so identical to another scene that it's not worth having two of the same. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-08-14 10:13am - 3943 days | #41 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I don't disagree with you but I was only pointing out that to only HIV has the reason for going all condom in porn is a mistake because the numbers HIV infected people in the porn industry is almost negligible when compared to almost any other type of STD. Warts and herpes probably won't kill you but it's still a life sentence for the person who gets the virus and sadly quite a few performers have been infected with one of these. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-07-14 10:00am - 3944 days | #39 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I'd like to add that pointing at HIV as the primary reason for forcing the industry to go all condom is a big mistake because condoms have not really been used in porn since the very beginning in the 70's and the total number of infected people is insignificant when compared to the number of every types of STD's. The simple truth is that condoms are the only technological solution to limiting the infections of std's and that's why they should be mandatory. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
03-06-14 05:27pm - 3945 days | #33 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Now that's a version of brokeback Mountain that I would have watched. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-16-14 12:01pm - 3963 days | #8 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Although I agree that todays Jenna does not look a lot like the 19 years old that came into the industry. The same could be said for almost any of them who started at the same time and at the same age. Of course the plastic surgery doesn't help but it's not like she didn't start to get work done long before she left the industry. We now see what 20 years and a hard life can do to a person. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-16-14 11:50am - 3963 days | #19 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
It's both possible and already happening. I read on ADT that a gay studio has started to remove condom from some of their scenes through some type of photoshopping. I don't expect to see this become common practice on the hetero side of the industry because it must be very expensive to do that and I've already said that porn producers are by nature cheap. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-15-14 07:06pm - 3964 days | #15 | ||||
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
That site is French and you will not see penetration without a condom. The only exception that I'm aware of was between two people that wee amateurs and I think married
You can't have it both ways and frankly you shouldn't. Your enjoyment of bareback porn should not come at someone else's health risk. Especially one that in all likelihood doesn't understand all the dangers involved.
I can't help you with that one because it makes no sense. That's like saying that it's not really eating if you don't really enjoy the food.
Not possible with current technology and even if it was. which company would have an on-site trained technician administering the test? These people are cheap beyond cheap and there is no way they would pay for that kind of service. I don't know if you realise but one of the main reasons why more companies don't use condoms is that they would have to buy them for the performers and that becomes a too expensive expense. Long live the Brown Coats. | ||||
|
02-15-14 06:52pm - 3964 days | #14 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
If you watch Eastern European porn than there is a very good chance that you have seen some of that fake cum coming out of the girls ass. They aren't the only ones doing that but they are one of the first. The problem remains that if you have a penis whose owner just happens to have an STD and he's pile driving in that girls ass all the while not wearing a condom then she will likely get infected. The infection is usually because there was fluid transfer and penises generate lubricating fluids that aren't semen so you don't have to wait until the cum shot to get the infection. A condom is the only possible solution to reduce STD's. It's not 100% but that's because humans are involved in the equation and we are naturally flawed. At some point you either consider condom porn or you start to watch the thousands of movies that have bareback sex in them. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-14-14 08:35am - 3965 days | #10 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I couldn't disagree with you more. You can believe that the Government wanted to get involved but the reality is far different. Most people tend to think that this story started in 2004 when Darren James was diagnosed with HIV and is believed to have infected not one or two but three different women. It's true that this is the catalyst for what is happening today but the story really begins 6 years earlier when it was revealed that Marc Wallice a veteran performer of more than 15 years in the industry had been using a fake test for about 2 years because he had HIV but didn't want to stop working. To make things worse he is responsible for infecting five women in the industry. Don't you think some of these would have loved to have had a condom in their scene? After the Darren incident. Osha went to the industry to see if there was something they could do to prevent these recurring problems. We are talking 2004 and in a decade. The only thing that the industry managed to do is write a workplace procedure book that no one has ever used and we have since then had 2 other HIV incidents, at least one HEP C case and a veteran performer working with a fake test all the while knowing that he is infected with syphilis. If anyone is to blame then point your finger at every porn producer that has chosen to shoot porn bareback when they know that condoms don't affect sales. You may disagree but Vivid and Wicked are two studios that have had no problem selling their movies and both until recently were condom only studios. Wicked still is but Vivid is no longer. I'd also like to add that you are incorrect in regards to the level of danger for oral sex VS penetration sex. By no means is oral sex safe if you don't know the sexual history of your partner or worse disregard it but the danger is significantly lower for oral sex than vaginal and it's even less so than anal sex. By far the most dangerous thing in porn is an anal creampie. This is believed to have been what infected most porn performers. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-13-14 06:15pm - 3966 days | #6 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^That is too bad because it limits you in what you can enjoy. A condom as never been an issue for me and knowing what I do then I prefer seeing them than not. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-13-14 09:43am - 3966 days | #3 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I don't know how much of what I'm writing is information that you already know so if it is then hopefully it will be useful for others. *There was a law past in California not that long ago that requires that a condom be used when there is vaginal and/or anal penetration for any scene shot in the State. A bunch of porn people tried to have the law thrown out but they lost their case so the law is now confirmed. *Many porn studios thought that it would be really hard to enforce the law because OSHA would need so many inspectors that it would make it too costly for them to do it but they were wrong. OSHA doesn't need that many inspectors because all they have to do is choose any studio and look their most recent releases and if there are no condoms then they contact the studio and ask them why there weren't any in the scene. if the studio says that it wasn't shot in CA then all OSHA has to do is ask for the filming permit for where the scene was shot. If the studio says that they didn't get a permit then OSHA has them guilty on two fronts. No condom and no permit. *People said that porn would go underground or shoot out of State and since Las Vegas is one of the closest location to LA then it made sense that some would go that route. On the surface that makes sense but porn is only legal in two States and Nevada is not one of them so openly shooting porn in that State is just asking for trouble. Las Vegas be called Sin City but that doesn't mean that they want porn to move their business there. Case in point the porn studio Naughty America who let go all of their CA staff and moved their production to Vegas. They got busted by Vegas PD and to make things worse. There was a fire at one of their filming locations the day after they had shot some stuff. They have since then moved back to CA. *Another gigantic problem as to why shooting in Nevada is not a good idea. The bulk of the performers, directors, and everyone else involved in porn live in and around LA. These people are not moving to Nevada no matter what the studios say and it's at least a 3 hour drive to get to Las Vegas from Los Angeles. Seeing as a your average porn scene requires many hours to shoot then a studios would probably need to find living quarters for a bunch of people as well as catering some food for these people. Those are all extra cost that they would not need to pay for in CA. *We finally get to my last point. Did you hear how Kink was fined 78,000$ for the Cameron Bay scene? They are trying to appeal it but they will lose and worse there are more fines coming so expect them to start shooting all their scene with condoms or go out of business from all the fines. It's not like they can play the pretend to shoot of State card because they advertised on their site that they only shoot in their San Francisco location. Based on everything that I wrote then it could be that Brazzer is finally starting to shoot condom porn. It's only a question of time before CA based studios all have to do that. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-12-14 06:23pm - 3967 days | #11 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I didn't mention that one but that is the best resource site when it comes to movies that were released on VHS and/or dvd. You can add EGAFD which is the European only version of IAFD but where the info can be quite lite in version when compared to IAFD. http://www.egafd.com/index.php There is also BGAFD which is the same as EGAFD but only for British performers. http://www.bgafd.co.uk/index.php Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-12-14 06:16pm - 3967 days | #11 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I don't actually remember the exact time but I think it was around 2006. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-12-14 07:32am - 3968 days | #5 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I can't name all the models that I follow because they are almost countless but I can tell you which resources are the best. These are in no particular. http://www.pornteengirl.com/model-update/update-model.html This site a very good job of offering info on both European and American models. As far as I know. All their links are for paid sites. Mind you I think all of the sites I'm referring to only offer links to paying sites. http://www.indexxx.com/ This site does about the same thing as porn teen girls but I don't like their design and navigating is harder than on PTG. I also don't think you are getting more than from PTG. http://www.data18.com/ This is the new guy on the block and it is the best one of the bunch in large part because their search engine allows user to search by keywords. They do the same as indexxx and PTG in that they keep track of both American and European models. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-11-14 10:23am - 3968 days | #5 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I know it sucks that someone who was able to use a debit card in the past must now use a credit card but I think it's both wise and proper to limit porn memberships to people who have a CC. My nephews are young teenagers and they have debit cards and I certainly don't want them to be able to join a porn site using those debit cards. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-10-14 05:46pm - 3969 days | #16 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
It would bring a new meaning to the word stiff. That and you would likely catch a bad case of nippleltiss from the cold. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-09-14 06:35pm - 3970 days | #9 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Granted Nascar and similar types of races where drivers are basically going round in circle only appeal to a certain part of the population. I couldn't tell you what the appeal is because I have no clue but I can certainly tell you what the appeal is with women driver. Let me rephrase that and say hot looking women drivers because those are the ones that your average guy is talking about. If Danica wasn't as cute as she is then she certainly wouldn't get talked about as much since her driving talent leaves a lot to be desired. Now picture a woman driver getting out of her car and she's wearing all those flame retardant clothes but soon she is removing those clothes and you are left with her wearing her driving uniform that is all wet from her perspiration and it's sticking in all the right places. Then there is the obvious calendar with her wearing bathing suits and bikinis. I don't think your average male driver is expected to do the calendar thing where he isn't wearing many clothes. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-09-14 06:23pm - 3970 days | #2 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I don't know if this falls under your definition but I've read on another forum that quite a few performers past and present have appeared on quite a few reality TV shows in the last few years. I couldn't give you any names because I don't remember any but I know that it's more than just a few. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-08-14 10:40am - 3971 days | #17 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I wonder if the stocking and garter industry has seen a boost in sales in recent years from producers requiring that their models wear them to hide all their tattoos. I seem to recall seeing more and more models wear them in shoots where I know the model has them on her thighs and legs. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-08-14 10:35am - 3971 days | #12 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I'd also like to know if all of those photo sets are shot over many months or if they were for the most part all done in a couple of days. Cost and logistic would make me think that it's better to shoot them all the same day(s) but then what you get is essentially the same model wearing pretty much the same clothes in multiple photosets and where the model obviously looks the same. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-08-14 10:28am - 3971 days | #3 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I am very disappointed in you. Here I thought you were a man of vision. It certainly doesn't have everything a sports enthusiast would like(at least me). For that you would need to add the obvious stripping their clothes off part to the sport. Let's put our cards on the table. The main reason why beach volleyball is popular is because you have some attractive athletic women jumping up and down. I dare say the bulk of viewers have no clue what the score is during a match because that's not what they are looking at. At least in my version the veil of hypocrisy surrounding this sport would be removed by adding what everyone really wants to see. You lose a point and a member of the team loses a piece of clothing. The game ends when one of the two teams is completely naked. This way viewers would be able to ogle...oops I meant to say look at many semi-naked women. To make it even more popular(probably not possible) you could add that it would be a best 2 out of 3 where the members of the loosing team has to wrestle naked in jello. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-08-14 10:10am - 3971 days | #6 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I think that the cheapest option is by default going the upgrade route but since your computer is 7 years old and I don't think it will last another seven then buying a new one is the best long term solution. Mind you if you can find a nice computer store that builds their own systems then you could probably get a computer that doesn't have all of the most recent parts in it but could have last years motherboard and what not for a decent amount. I'm not comfortable with going the Dell or any massed produced computer route because I prefer to pick and choose what parts go in my computer. This way I can pick a better video and sound card than what is normally included on most motherboard. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-07-14 10:06am - 3972 days | #8 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I see it differently than you because I think that unlike a video starring the same person(s). Photo shoots where the same model is doing about the same thing, in about the same location she has done elsewhere is more duplication than anything else because there's literally isn't much that's different from one shoot to the next. The only exception would be if the shoots are in different locations and/or if the model is wearing different clothes from one site to the next but that last one will soon look like all the others once the model is nude. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
02-06-14 07:51am - 3974 days | #5 | ||||
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
You are correct but since so much of their content still requires that paying members use a very expensive ticket system then it makes this site one of the more expensive one on the net.
Yes and no. If you took their one month offer then you were given 35 tickets that can be applied to any of their videos. The problem is that since so many of them require 3 tickets to download then you were either limited to downloading only 10 or so videos or buying more tickets.
That is now common practice for many sites. This is their way to bring back past members.
Based on the listed prices on their site then those 100 tickets should have cost you 100$. On the surface that is a very good price but since I have already said that you need about 3 or so tickets to download one video then what you really have is the ability to download about 30 or so videos for 100$. I agree that their most recent stuff is exclusive but the bulk of their content is still stuff that can be found on sites like Videobox and VideosZ because it's the stuff Sineplex and Sinsational produced years ago. I think they hire some amazingly beautiful women but so much of their content falls under the category of circus porn that you can't help but lose interest in it. I'd also like to point out that hiring a hot looking woman is one thing but dressing her like a prostitute and treating her like a piece of meat is not going to turn out a great scene. All you'll get is dirty porn where it's clear that the guys are having fun but the girl isn't. Case in point Linda Sweet's most recent scene. You have taken a super hot young woman and turned her into a cock receptacle where it's impossible for someone like me to believe that taking two dicks in the ass is pleasurable for her. All I can think when I see these is that she won't make it beyond one year(if that much) because her body can't take the abuse. Long live the Brown Coats. | ||||
|
02-06-14 07:25am - 3974 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I know that I wasn't and I was even willing to lose half my money on the transaction because of that. If you are are curious and haven't done so yet then read my comments on this site. I'd love it if they were a straight forward type of site because I'm sure they have a few scenes that I would love to won but thee is no way that I'm jumping through loops to watch porn. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
751-800 of 3575 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 15 | Page 16 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 41 | 49 | 57 | 71 | 72 | Next Page > |
|