Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: lk2fireone (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3618)  |   Threads Started (237)

3101-3150 of 3618 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 11 20 29 38 47 62 Page 63 64 65 66 67 72 73 Next Page >

06-09-10  09:24pm - 5310 days #17
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


I have both copies of the girl in question, and it's clear to me they did indeed pass her off as a different girl, even going so far as to bringing her on first as a brunette and later as a blond. Interviews and the usual step by step routine Pierre runs through with new girls were followed in the same manner individually in both scenes, and, for all practical purposes, treated as two different girls.
To me that kinda smacks of passing them off as different participants. I have the videos..they're yours for the asking


It appears that we are talking about 2 different models.

I found the 2 clips of the model I was thinking about.
In the first video clip, she has sex with Pierre Woodman.
In the second video clip, she has sex with a different, younger male model.

The model I am looking at, named Julia in both clips I am seeing, has brown hair in both video clips.

You state that the model you are thinking/talking about is brunette in one clip, and blonde in the second clip.
If the model I am looking at changes her hair to blonde in some clip, I haven't seen that clip, or remember seeing it.

Can you tell me what names were used for the model in the clips you have, and also the titles of the clips?

Some of the video clips follow the format of:
"Private_Castings_12__Pierre_Woodman__Mercedes"
where 12 would be the number of the clip in the series, and "Mercedes" would be the name of the model.

The model I was talking about appears in the video clip:
"Private_Castings_37__Pierre_Woodman__Julia".

06-09-10  04:32pm - 5310 days #2
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
How much value is there in moving to Europe, or South America, or anyplace else, unless you are moving to a country that has poor relations with the United States?
Polanski is a French citizen, who was grabbed in Switzerland. He had not broken any French law or Swiss law that caused him to be grabbed and locked up. He had broken a U.S. law. And that was many years ago. Over 30 years ago. So if Max gets out of jail and starts producing or selling porn again, what's to stop the U.S. authorities from grabbing him again, even if he's outside of the U.S.? Who's going to stand up and say the U.S. can't grab him, or issue an arrest warrant, and have some foreign country's law enforcement seize Max and put him in jail, pending extradition?

Max would need a country with poor relations with the U.S., and one that would also tolerate his producing porn, if he wants to produce porn safely. And then he would have to kiss his U.S. citizenship goodbye, because it could be "straight to jail" if he ever came back.

This is a case where it just doesn't pay to fight big government.

06-09-10  03:40pm - 5310 days #11
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


I've seen enough of this aging, French Lothario to say he's the perfect example of what I'm talking about. This guy's gotta be among the best at his craft, because he's got even savvy PU aficionados believing it's spontaneous and in real-time.
I'm gonna take the liberty to quote our esteemed and valued member RagingBuddhist: "if you're not cynical, you're not paying attention." These gals are interrogated and read the do's and dont's way before they're actually preforming....and all the "persuading" going on during this mesmerizing seduction all goes with Pierre's phenomenal act. I'm going to site one example and then I'm outta here: One has to look real hard, but of the few hot young girls I've seen him interview, the hottest one I noticed was brought on again disguised and made up to look like a new participant. SO, assuming I'm right about all this...may I then appeal to the au courant among us to check this out.
And to my illustrious fellow PinkPanther, with The Lord of the Rings thing, a little more, if you please, about "getting my money back."


Point 1: The Woodman videos are not what is called "real-time". If you watch even a few of these videos closely, you will see that the videos are edited, there are breaks in the continuity where, obviously, some of the video was deleted. This is true for both before and during the actual sex.

Point 2: I believe I know the model you are referring to, that appears in 2 different casting videos. I did not get the impression that the girl was being disguised in any way. It's obviously the same girl in both instances, as far as I can tell. (Sometimes different models can look very similar, but I strongly believe it's the same model in both clips). I don't know where you got the impression that the model was supposed to be performing for the first time in both clips. The model did go thru the "standard" performance in both cases, I think, where she is questioned before the sex acts. But that is just the basic format that Woodman uses in his clips: talking to the model/questioning of the model, followed by Woodman eating the girl, then fucking her, then a blowjob, then vaginal or anal sex. Sometimes the order is changed slightly, but there is not a lot of variation in what he does with these girls.

Edit: Actually, it's been a while since I saw the 2 clips. I think in the second clip of the same model, Woodman might have used a male performer to take on the girl, instead of doing her himself. But if so, the male performer followed the same type of routine that Woodman uses. Edited on Jun 09, 2010, 03:47pm

06-09-10  07:15am - 5311 days #166
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I saw a trailer for Jonah Hex. The movie is supposed to be a Western, Action/Adventure, Fantasy based on a comic or computer game.

"Jonah Hex is a scarred drifter and bounty hunter of last resort, a tough and stoic gunslinger who can track down anyone... and anything. Having survived death, Jonah's violent history is steeped in myth and legend, and has left him with one foot in the natural world and one on the "other side." His only human connection is with Lila, whose life in a brothel has left her with scars of her own. Jonah's past is about to catch up with him when the U.S. military makes him an offer he can't refuse: in exchange for his freedom from the warrants on his head, he must track down and stop the dangerous terrorist Quentin Turnbull. But Turnbull, who is gathering an army and preparing to unleash Hell, is also Jonah's oldest enemy and will stop at nothing until Jonah is dead."

The trailer that I saw had Jonah (played by Josh Brolin) facing 4 or 5 armed men, or maybe even more than 5 men. Jonah is on a horse. Will he be able to draw fast enough to outshoot all the men, or will he be shot dead along with some of his opponents?

I was amazed when Jonah uncovered two gatling guns that were slung on the sides of his horse, and the gatling guns started blazing away, cutting down the opponents.

What amazed me the most was that the horse started moving when the gatling guns began to fire, so that the gatling guns were able to cut down all the opponents. Did the horse have supernatural intelligence that it was able to consciously aim the gatling guns at the "bad" men? Or was the horse being controlled by Jonah while the gatling guns were blazing away? Any normal horse, with two gatling guns blazing away at its sides, would have reared and plunged and screamed and gone crazy. But that was one special horse, I figured.

This is one special movie. I don't know how well it will do. I plan to see it on DVD, if I still remember the trailer.

The release date for this movie is June 17 (in theaters). Edited on Jun 09, 2010, 07:30am

06-09-10  03:00am - 5311 days #3
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
The closest thing to reality porn I've seen are the casting videos by Pierre Woodman. That guy is amazing in his ability to persuade young girls to perform sex on camera. Many of the girls are first-time models for porn, and some of them have gone on to become famous.

06-08-10  03:12pm - 5311 days #9
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by atrapat:


Apart from most of those already mentioned, HBO's Deadwood (2 seasons): it's great TV and many characters are based in real historical figures. Very recommendable.


I liked Deadwood so much, I bought the DVDs for the entire series, seasons 1, 2, and 3.

Off topic, I also bought the series DVDs for Rome (seasons 1 and 2), which I thought was another great series.

I only wish both of these series had lasted even longer. Edited on Jun 08, 2010, 03:16pm

06-08-10  07:45am - 5312 days #3
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Almost all the Clint Eastwood westerns were very enjoyable, and he made a lot of them. My three favorites from those were the Man with No Name series, from Sergio Leone.
But Unforgiven, Pale Rider, and The Outlaw Josey Wales were also very good. Really, better than just very good.

At the time I first saw them, and I think I saw every western Eastwood made, I thought every western he made was enjoyable.

Gunfight at the OK Corral, with Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas, is one of my favorites, though the remake (?) Tombstone, with Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer, is also very good.

High Noon is also one of my favorites, with Gary Cooper and Grace Kelly. The gunfights and style of the movie are very different from today's CGI action extravaganzas, but the story is powerful, and Grace Kelly is absolutely gorgeous.

I'm sure there are a bunch of other westerns that I should mention, because I grew up when they were still making westerns as part of the main genres of movies. Glenn Ford in Cimarron was very good.

But those are some of the ones that I really enjoyed.

06-07-10  05:48am - 5313 days #7
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I'm different. When I find hardcore clips of a favorite softcore model, I watch them, but I like the model less.
The mind is a curious thing to figure.

06-06-10  12:14pm - 5313 days #2
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I think it's kind of what that movie "When Harry Met Sally" was about.
And yes, I've seen porn stars/models that did not impress me at first, and then later, for whatever reason, I really started to like/appreciate them.
I don't know what the psychology is behind what the mind likes or really appreciates.
I also don't understand how or why I can appreciate photo sets of lovely models at softcore sites like met-art or mplstudios or other sites, yet the videos with those same models at those sites leave me totally bored. For some reason it's very difficult for me to find softcore videos that I really like, but I can easily find softcore photosets that I really enjoy.

05-30-10  02:58pm - 5320 days #161
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Actually, I recently read an article that said in the movie business, the main source of profits, in descending order, was:
1. sales to TV (including cable)
2. DVD sales
3. box office

Box office is supposed to be a tiny profit or break-even business. There's even a saying in Hollywood that the theatrical release is a trailer for the DVD and TV sales.

So unless you are in the business, or read an article about the way it really works, you wouldn't have the foggiest idea of the business side of movie making.

05-30-10  02:44pm - 5320 days #19
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I know I have previously said that everyone in porn should use condoms. But on thinking it over a bit, I think that if the women don't want to wear a condom, that should be their personal choice. But it should still be required for all male performers, and for she-males as well.

05-30-10  02:21pm - 5320 days #159
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Prince of Persia opens at #3 this weekend, taking in an estimated $30 million.
The relatively poor opening means the movie, produced by Jerry Bruckheimer (Pirates of the Caribbean), will probably not lead to a franchise like Pirates of the Caribbean.

But there are so many other movies out there, based on comics and games and whatnot, that are probably going to have their own sequels.

05-30-10  02:21pm - 5320 days #158
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Prince of Persia opens at #3 this weekend, taking in an estimated $30 million.
The relatively poor opening means the movie, produced by Jerry Bruckheimer (Pirates of the Caribbean), will probably not lead to a franchise like Pirates of the Caribbean.

But there are so many other movies out there, based on comics and games and whatnot, that are probably going to have their own sequels.

05-29-10  11:28am - 5321 days #6
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I don't like seeing condoms used. But this is stupidity or prejudice on my part. Because of AIDS and other diseases, condoms should be required in all porn scenes, and I need to learn to accept that.

05-28-10  08:50pm - 5322 days #156
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Spending $30 million to advertise a $10 million movie ($10 million for production cost) seems ridiculous to me. I'm not in the business, but there's got to be a way to release low-budget movies less expensively, where the advertising costs are more in line with the production costs.
But then again, if the basic marketing costs to release a movie in theaters are that expensive, I can understand why so many movies are direct-to-video releases without a theatrical run.

05-28-10  07:34am - 5323 days #153
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
My prince has come.
Jake Gyllenhaal stars in Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, which opens today.
This is a Jerry Bruckheimer production (Pirates of the Carribean), so it's an expensive movie filled with special effects.
But the critics are giving this a thumbs down. Rotten Tomatoes is giving it a 41, which is a low score.
So I guess I'll wait for the DVD. Not because the critics don't like the movie, but from what I've read and seen, the movie is not that good. I don't enjoy large special effects that are not combined with a good story or something to root for. And as far as I'm concerned, Jake can stay buried in one of those sand storms.

05-27-10  06:41pm - 5323 days #152
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I read that Macgruber cost about 10 million dollars to make & another it will have to make at least 50 million to make profit.


Why does it have to make at least $50 million to make a profit if it only cost $10 million to make? Do you have a simple explanation of how to calculate the return on a movie? I understand there can be many costs to a movie beyond the simple production costs (marketing would be one additional cost), but it doesn't sound reasonable that a $10 million movie would require $50 million in box office to break even.

05-26-10  05:53pm - 5324 days #147
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Maybe this guy would have better luck trying to rob a gas station?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<




Wash. police: 'Drugstore Cowboy' author busted (AP)
Source: AP 4 hours, 1 minute ago


REDMOND, Wash. - Police in Washington state say the man who wrote "Drugstore Cowboy" has been arrested in yet another pharmacy robbery.

James Fogle was arrested with another man Tuesday night after they allegedly tied up employees at a pharmacy in Redmond, east of Seattle. The Seattle Times reports Fogle will be arraigned Thursday on a charge of first-degree armed robbery.

Fogle has spent much of his adult life in prison, which is where he wrote "Drugstore Cowboy." Filmmaker Gus Van Sant turned the novel into the acclaimed 1989 film starring Matt Dillon. The work was loosely based on Fogle's life robbing pharmacies to feed his addictions.

Redmond police spokesman Jim Bove says robbing pharmacies "is probably the only thing he knows."

___

Information from: The Seattle Times, http://www.seattletimes.com
More on: Matt Dillon

05-26-10  05:20pm - 5324 days #146
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I haven't seen MacGruber. Maybe I will see it on DVD.
The critics gave it a poor grade, for what that's worth. Critics opinions don't count very much with me.
But the movie has bombed. $4 million for its debut weekend.
So it will probably last a couple of weeks at the box office, then reappear on DVD sometime later.
Val Kilmer and Ryan Phillipe are in the movie, but that didn't save it from bombing.
Kilmer and Phillipe used to be hot, but it's been a while since either was in a hit movie.

05-26-10  06:26am - 5325 days #29
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Hopefully, by the time a nuclear war starts, we will have gotten past the stage where you need men and women to procreate. In the future, as part of their supplies, nuclear subs will carry frozen sperm and eggs, so the different species (including humans) can be re-started as needed if the world is blown to hell. Isn't that God's backup plan for Earth? The subs themselves can be unmanned, with HAL 9000 commanders in control.

05-25-10  07:24pm - 5325 days #140
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I saw Iron Man 2 today. It was good, but Iron Man 1 was better.

05-24-10  08:15pm - 5326 days #139
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I saw Avatar on DVD a few days ago. I thought it was one of the best Science Fiction movies I've ever seen, and I've been watching Science Fiction movies for over 50 years. Avatar is a visual feast.

05-23-10  11:44pm - 5327 days #135
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
pat362, have you seen Robin Hood yet? Which is the better movie (more enjoyable), Robin Hood or Iron Man 2? I'm trying to figure out which one I want to see.

05-22-10  02:49pm - 5328 days #2
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I'm surprised more porn sites aren't going out of business. The recession/downturn has lasted quite a while, and the porn sites are getting hit along with the rest of the business economy.

But we don't read specific news or listings of which smaller sites have been closed.

I think that American Vice did a classy thing by sending out emails to subscribers notifying them what was happening, and stating they would give a refund.

I believe there are plenty of small sites that have stopped updating, but still accept new members, and the members won't realize the sites have stopped updating until after they have joined. Not exactly the same situation as what happened at American Vice, but like I say, I think American Vice is a class act. Just sorry to see them go.

05-21-10  11:19am - 5329 days #132
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
$20 adult ticket price to see Shrek 4 at an IMAX theater in New York City? The $20 price was posted online this Wednesday, but then the price was dropped to $17 or $19.

These are IMAX theaters, in New York City, for a 3-D movie.

But $20? Or even $17-$19?

I'm waiting to see Shrek 4 on DVD. At Redbox, you can rent DVDs for $1 (not including tax).

05-21-10  10:42am - 5329 days #32
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


BTW, replace the "arduous" in my original post with "tedious!" I just noticed the mistake.


I don't see any mistake. "Tedious" works, but so does "arduous". Trying to to build a photo or video collection by searching through TGP sites takes a huge amount of time and effort. Paysites cost dollars, but the quality is so much better, and it's so much easier.

05-19-10  06:25pm - 5331 days #2
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I thought you were going to confess that you were female. That would have been a shock, but one that I could handle.

But to read that you now consider Reality Kings your favorite porn site, just goes to show that I never really knew you at all.

Our tastes are completely different. I knew they were different, but not that much.

LOL.

05-16-10  07:54pm - 5334 days #48
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


My formative years were spent in Germany, goldfish!


Does that explain why your wolfie is howling at the moon? Because he years to return to his roots? I thought that wolves (and werewolves) were supposed to come from England or some such place. If you find any in the U.S. or Canada, they must have missed seeing "An American Werewolf in London". Werewolves (and the more normal kind) are supposed to stay in the countryside. It's when they come to London and the other big cities that they get into trouble.

05-16-10  03:59am - 5335 days #17
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by Capn:


I reckon if the site name were blanked out, you would be hard pushed to tell one from another in terms of content.
Cap'n.


It depends on how hard you are pushing.

I remember back in the 1960s I read that Huge Hefner drank Pepsi instead of Coke. They are both colas, I could tell the difference in taste between the 2 brands, and liked Coca Cola better. But I didn't mind drinking Pepsi if I couldn't get Coke.

The same idea applies to softcore teen mega-sites. I strongly prefer Met-art photosets over Femjoy photosets. And JustTeenSite would be in third place. Some of the same photographers and models appear at all 3 sites in photosets. Met-art uses more photoshopping than Femjoy. The level of photoshopping at JustTeenSite is close to what Met-art uses. Met-art uses more color and costumes than Femjoy or JustTeenSite. Met-art uses more make-up on the models.

Some PU members prefer the Femjoy style over Met-art, saying the Femjoy look is more natural. But I think the same models usually look prettier at Met-art than at Femjoy. It's a matter of personal taste.

But some people probably pay little attention to the details, and figure all 3 sites are basically the same. Which they are, in that they are softcore teen mega-sites. Edited on May 16, 2010, 04:05am

05-16-10  03:14am - 5335 days #17
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I think you nailed it, Cap'n. Greener grass, or the one that got away is always the biggest, best, what you really wanted to catch. Human nature. I'll try to be satisfied with whatever comes my way, as long as I think it's nice quality. Less frustrating that way.

05-15-10  09:16pm - 5335 days #15
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


It's overwhelming isn't it? Once in a while I make an effort and start with file one on external drive one but then I contemplate the other 2 TB to go, get impatient, go on-line and download some more!


Maybe you should start the deletion of porn files with my collection, since I seem to have a much smaller stash than you do, so it wouldn't take as long.

On the other hand, since our tastes are different, you would probably delete almost everything I have. So I guess I need a different solution to my over-sized porn collection.

But if you send me your stash for evaluation, I would probably be able to delete almost everything you have. And then you could start fresh.

Wouldn't that be a relief for you?

I'm thinking that collecting porn has twisted our brains. Who would have thought that downloading porn, trying to find the prime stuff, would be better than actually watching the material? We certainly spend more time chasing after the good stuff than watching it.

On the other hand, watching the material is only part of the process/experience. There have been studies on this, I'm sure.

But the pack rat mentality seems widespread for the PU members. Edited on May 15, 2010, 09:25pm

05-15-10  06:39am - 5336 days #23
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Ed2009, thanks for your explanation of how names are used for models.
Like many things, something apparently simple can get complicated.

05-14-10  08:27pm - 5336 days #20
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I did follow your explanation, Khan. Thanks again for the help.

05-14-10  07:45pm - 5336 days #18
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Thanks for the very simple and clear answer, Khan. I thought that was the way it was, but confirmation from an "expert" is always helpful. Also, if you haven't been pissed about the multi-name model confusion, it seems you're not heavily into collecting. It makes searching for a favorite model's material harder, as well as making the filing under the different names more difficult. But why should the porn sites try to make life too simple for the dedicated porn collector? Lol.

05-14-10  07:21pm - 5336 days #4
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
There's a lot of porn that I downloaded onto my PC that I've never bothered to view. I would love to delete the inferior material. But I shudder to think of all the time it would take to look through the porn files to select what I really want to keep. It just seems easier to buy new external hard drives and fill them up with still more porn.

05-14-10  04:39pm - 5336 days #16
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I used to work with European models when I first started out. Many of them refused to let me use their real names and had no interest in using a fixed stagename. Many didn't want to make a career of it, they were just happy for me to avoid their real name.


As a webmaster, can you provide a simple answer to the question: who is in control of the name listed for a model who appears in a photo shoot or video on a web site?

My guess is that the web site (webmaster) is in control. Not the model or the photographer or person who shot the video.

Does the contract that gives the web site the right to publish a photo shoot or video also give the web site the right to name the photo shoot or video? Or does the right to name the material belong to someone else (the model, the photographer, or who, specifically)?

05-14-10  07:13am - 5337 days #129
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Hopefully it was actually one of their models and not something sent in to Beaver Hunt! I guess it was if it smelled like perfume.


I've smelled some pretty stinky perfumes in my time. Lol.

05-13-10  09:17pm - 5337 days Original Post - #1
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA


One night a man was getting very drunk in a pub. He staggered back to take a piss, whipping his prick out as he went in the door. However, he had wandered into the ladies room by mistake, surprising a woman sitting on the can, "This is for ladies!" she screamed. The drunk waved his dick at her and said "So is this!"

05-13-10  07:32pm - 5337 days #5
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I'm not in the business end of porn, just a consumer. So I don't have any hard facts about the way names are given. But my impression was that the site where the photos or videos are posted was the source of the model's name. The site owns the right to post the video or photographic material, and it "gives" whatever name it wants to the models. I doubt that the photographer or model's agent or the model herself has much control over what name the site uses.

A site like Met-art sometimes gives a model one name for a photoset, then gives a different name to the same model for a different photoset, and then possibly gives still a different name to that model on a different photoset.

And Metmodels, which I believe is owned by the same people that own Met-art, can give still different names to that same model in their photosets.

Wittyguy sums it up perfectly: "I guess its just us pervs who obsess over our collections that are bent about this one."

Except that I have stopped obsessing about trying to track down all the names of my favorite models. I try to be satisfied in getting whatever comes my way, without spending too much time and effort in searching the internet.

05-12-10  09:17pm - 5338 days #124
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
The Playboy Magazine centerfold is supposed to be coming out in 3-D. I thinks it's just the one issue, though.

05-12-10  05:35pm - 5338 days #6
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by Capn:


Another variation on this is the inverse tick box.
Cap'n.


It almost sounds like you're discussing strategy in chess. Which is more fun, I wonder: playing chess, buying a car, or signing up for a new porn site. Lol.

I try to keep my porn buys simple.

I can't remember ever seeing an inverse tick box. But my memory is not that great, so I can't be positive. Another thing to watch out for.

05-10-10  12:49pm - 5340 days #120
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I'm thinking I might see Iron Man 2 or Robin Hood this coming weekend. I liked Iron Man 1, but from the previews, I doubt I will like Iron Man 2 as much. Part 2 has more villains and explosions, so the story is more disjointed. Because the first one did so well, they're trying to top it with all the special effects, and I really think that after a point, less is more. Box office on Iron Man 2 is very strong, it's taking in maybe 50% more money, but just because a movie is popular doesn't mean I will enjoy it that much.

05-09-10  10:43pm - 5341 days #9
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I sometimes think that business uses a foreign language that only appears to look like English.

I remember my mother got a letter from her HMO (health maintenance organization) one time. They were raising her monthly membership fees, and reducing her coverage (she would have to pay more out of her pocket for the same services she was getting before).

They said they were doing this to give her better service. Better service means you pay more and get less coverage?

05-09-10  10:14pm - 5341 days #118
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I remember that I saw at least a few movies in 3-D back in the 1950s, but I don't remember what the experience was like. I also remember that I bought some comics (paperback comics) in 3-D back in the 1950s. I think one of the 3-D comics I bought was about the 3 stooges. But I don't even remember specifically what movies I saw that were in 3-D when I saw them.
But I do agree that the 3-D movies being made today are probably much superior to what was made in the 1950s, on a technical basis.
It's just that I had eye strain or was bothered/annoyed/distracted from the experience of watching the 3-D movie by the 3-D effect. I had a hard time adjusting to it, so that I was not able to fully enjoy the movie itself.

Edit: I took the 3-D glasses home, because they were nice plastic glasses. I just put them on now, to look at my PC monitor, and just wearing the 3-D glasses, I can feel the same eye strain, like the beginning of a headache, that I felt in the movie theater. So it was not the 3-D movie that caused the problem, but the problem was wearing the 3-D glasses, and trying to get used to them.

People react differently to the same stimulus, so this must be a slightly unusual effect that I am experiencing. Otherwise, the 3-D movies would not be as popular as they are.

Edit #2: Still using the 3-D glasses I got at the movie theater, I am looking at some 3-D photos I downloaded from a site. The 3-D photos do not show any 3-D effect when viewed using the 3-D glasses I got from the movie theater. So I assume that there are different types of 3-D systems, and that you need to use the type of glasses special to that system to get the 3-D effect. Edited on May 09, 2010, 10:25pm

05-09-10  09:56pm - 5341 days #7
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I never had a download limit set by any ISP. But I've never had a really fast, or even moderately fast, download membership to test any download limits.

But I did belong to an adult paysite that had a download limit, and I was blocked several times for going over the daily limit. That was not because I actually went over the limit. The site miscounted my download usage because I was using a download manager, and their system overstated the amount I downloaded by 4 times. I used about 3 GB, and they said I had used 12 GB.
Because of the large size of the video files today, it does not take that many files to hit even 12 GB on a daily basis.

05-09-10  09:22pm - 5341 days #116
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I just saw How To Train Your Dragon in 3-D.
It's the first 3-D movie I've seen since the 1950s. I was curious to see what a 3-D movie was like now.
Throughout the entire movie, I was trying to get used to wearing the 3-D glasses, so that distracted from my enjoyment of the film.
I tried taking the 3-D glasses off several times, but put them back on each time, because the movie is definitely meant to be viewed in 3-D, and it looks strange when seen without the glasses.
But based on this experience, I won't be seeing another 3-D movie for quite a while.

05-09-10  07:27pm - 5341 days #7
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Are you talking about an external or internal hard drive? If you are talking about an external hard drive, all you do is plug it into your PC, and that is the installation. The external hard drive comes with its own separate casing, so if you want to lay it flat, or sideways, or in some other position on your desk, on the floor, or wherever, I don't know how much difference that will make.

But it really sounds more like you are talking about an internal hard drive, which would be installed inside the case of your PC.

Unless you were making a joke, to begin with?

05-07-10  02:56pm - 5343 days #12
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
The first few times I saw JAV (Japanese) videos where the models were making sounds like they were being tortured, I thought it was kind of strange. But then I got used to it somehow, and it doesn't annoy me that much. It doesn't turn me on, by any means. But it's far less annoying than the fake moans and groans from U.S. porn actresses who are supposed to be expressing pleasure, excitement, whatever. I just believe that the American actresses are faking their excitement, and it detracts from the enjoyment of the scene. Whereas I don't appreciate the Japanese models whining as if they are being tortured or abused, I somehow seem to accept it as a form of stylized behavior.

But one of the major benefits of a beautiful or erotic photoset is that I don't have to listen to the fake moans, groans, whines, etc. I can just look at the lovely faces and bodies without that distraction.

And the soundtrack to a lot of these videos is also a distraction. Instead of adding to the mood or value of a scene, the music is stupid, inappropriate, too loud, jarring, etc.

Many of these videos are better seen with the mute button on. But that is also annoying, because you know there's supposed to be sound, the mind expects it, and maybe I should learn to play some mood music from a separate source while watching these vids. Or I can moan and groan along with the action, as long as I don't annoy my neighbors. My moaning and groaning can't be any worse than some of the videos I've seen and heard. Lol. Edited on May 07, 2010, 03:06pm

05-05-10  07:06pm - 5345 days #2
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Is someone around here having a bad porn-day? I sometimes have that problem with my desktop, which is why I got a new laptop. But that has created a new set of problems: Like trying to type on a laptop keyboard, use the laptop mouse, view the laptop monitor, etc. etc. etc.

05-05-10  06:54pm - 5345 days #9
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by justme:


I much prefer the soft nude sites that update 2 or 3 times a week, over a site like Met-Art that updates 28 times a week! Sounds strange, but something is just more satisfying about a site with limited viewing choices. I find myself lost in a daze trying to navigate the mega sites...


Personal preference, maybe, but I strongly prefer a mega-site like Met-art that gives me a large number of updates over a site that gives a much smaller number of updates. The sites with the smaller number of updates will usually argue that they have better quality updates, but I don't agree. I think that the quality at Met-art is about as good as it gets. If a person doesn't appreciate the content at Met-art, that is understandable. But if you appreciate the content but dislike the site because there is so much that you would enjoy viewing, that does sound a little strange.

3101-3150 of 3618 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 11 20 29 38 47 62 Page 63 64 65 66 67 72 73 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.11 seconds.