|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
lk2fireone (0)
|
| 3251-3300 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 12 | 22 | 32 | 42 | 52 | 65 | Page 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
| 01-13-10 04:45am - 5457 days | #34 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Megan Fox (the hottie in Transformers) is the new lead model for Armani. Great face, great body. Does it matter if she can act? Not with a body (and face) like hers. | |
|
||
| 01-13-10 03:06am - 5457 days | #33 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm no fan of shake-'em-up cinematography. But give them time, and I'm sure we will be able to watch Spiderman and his buddies (does he have any friends who are superheroes or superhero wannabes?) fighting the forces of evil for the next 20 years, which is the responsibility of every superhero. I don't really understand why Batman lost Robin. Did Batman just lose interest in being a father-figure, or was there some homo-erotic element that Batman grew past? I've read different interpretations on why Robin was no longer relevant. | |
|
||
| 01-11-10 09:36pm - 5459 days | #29 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Hollywood can be a fast-changing place. Last week Tobey Maguire (who played Spiderman in the first 3 Spiderman films) said he was excited about the next Spiderman film and that he had specific ideas about the evolution of the character on the big screen. Today, he said ""I am so proud of what we accomplished with the 'Spider-Man' franchise over the last decade." However, Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios announced today (Monday) that a new "Spider-Man" film based on a script by James Vanderbilt that focuses on Peter Parker in high school would debut in the summer of 2012 with a new cast and filmmaking team. So Tobey Maguire and Sam Raimi (the director of the first 3 Spiderman movies) are out. http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.ap.o...iderman-franchise-ap | |
|
||
| 01-09-10 01:19pm - 5461 days | #25 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I believe that in Closer Natalie Portman did take her clothes off in one scene, but that scene was cut from the theatrical version of the movie. I don't know if there are any Internet outtakes from that scene, or if that cut scene was included in the deleted scenes for a DVD version of the movie. Probably not. I'm pretty sure Natalie Portman said she was happy the nude scene was not included in the final movie. My impression is that she was never comfortable with her being nude in any movie. She was also uncomfortable, after the movie was released, with the overly sexual aspect of her first movie, The Professional, filmed when she was only 12, where she was playing a lolita-like role in some ways to the professional assassin who is the main character. There was no sex between the Natalie Portman character and the assassin, but there was love between them. Edit: There is a shorter and longer version of The Professional. The longer version has a scene where the lolita-like role is expanded, and I believe the Natalie Portman character actually does offer to make love to the assassin. But I saw the movie years ago, and the details are not really that clear to me. The theatrical version in the U.S. was the shorter version, which reduced the lolita-like aspect, to make the movie less controversial, because the movie has a ton of violence even without the lolita-aspect. Edited on Jan 09, 2010, 01:28pm | |
|
||
| 01-08-10 03:25am - 5462 days | #20 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The porn world has lost a major star. Natalie Portman vows never to strip naked on the big screen again. Who can replace this fabulous actress in our hearts and minds (and crotches)? I've liked her since The Professional (1994), the first movie she made when she was around 12 years old. But should we really agonize over whether this actress will expose part of her body so porn sites can post pictures of her? There are porn sites that will post pictures of her whether she is nude or not, because that's part of what they do, post pictures of actresses to attract more viewers. By the way, in spite of enjoying some of her movies, I haven't seen the movie where she partially stripped. And I haven't seen any of the stills from that movie posted on the Internet. So maybe I'm not part of the Internet Peeping Tom crowd. But since I have joined Internet porn sites, then again, maybe I am part of the Internet Peeping Tom crowd. I refuse to classify myself as a Peeping Tom. Isn't that something illegal? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.asp...450556>1=28101 Movie News Natalie Portman: I won't be taking off my clothes again Jan. 7, 2010, 5:25 PM EST WENN Natalie Portman has made herself a promise never to strip naked onscreen -- because she doesn't want to find herself on a porn site. The actress partially stripped for a sex scene in 2007 movie "Hotel Chevalier," and that was enough to send lusty Internet peeping Toms into overdrive, posting stills of the saucy scene all over the web. She told WENN, "It really depressed me that half of every review on the film was about the nudity. It made me think I shouldn't have done it. "I'm not prudish about nudity. I think it's beautiful in films, and sex is such a big part of life. My issue is that I feel it takes something away from what you're doing when the focus is put on the wrong thing. My picture ended up on porn sites, and that's the dilemma." Also: Portman says she thinks about having kids The experience left Portman shaken and now she's committed to keeping her clothes on at all times. She tells Elle magazine, "I just don't want to do something that will end up as a screen grab on a porn site. "You look at Meryl Streep, who is so phenomenally, freakishly gorgeous, and, in some ways, it's just bizarre that she was never a sex symbol, but it was always about her -- and now it doesn't matter that she's getting older, because we just want to continue watching her be an interesting person. "Whereas you see actresses who marketed themselves on their bodies, and they might be good, but, over time, they just lose it because that sort of thing doesn't last." The Israel-born star is also keen to steer clear of Jewish roles: "I've always tried to stay away from playing Jews... I get, like, 20 Holocaust scripts a month, but I hate the genre." | |
|
||
| 01-06-10 12:59am - 5464 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I would guess that most porn sites have been experiencing a drop in the number of their subscribers, because of the recession. I would also guess that the number of porn sites that have closed has increased because of the recession. And that the number of updates has also gone down, because of the recession (smaller numbers of paying members means less money for the sites to get new material and to pay their bills). There are probably specific articles or news sources that could validate my guesses, but my google skills are severely limited. I think Wittyguy has posted tidbits on the porn industry, and could probably find the data to prove or disprove my guesses on the current health of the porn industry. Edited on Jan 06, 2010, 04:52pm | |
|
||
| 01-06-10 12:47am - 5464 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I agree with PinkPanther, met-art has one of the highest update rates of any porn site (4 or more per day), and their updates are high quality. I'm surprised that they have maintained a massive update rate year after year for photosets (the video update rate is much less). They certainly don't need to post so many daily updates, based on what their competition is offering on an update basis. I would assume (I don't have any hard evidence for this) that their membership numbers are far greater than any other softcore porn site, because of their huge number of high-quality photosets and the high daily update rate for photosets. Some people might consider the met-art videos as a bonus. But almost all of the comments of PU members on the met-art videos consider them a waste of time, myself included. | |
|
||
| 01-05-10 03:34pm - 5465 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've never joined a "free" site that required credit card information. I don't believe the law (U.S. or international) requires a credit card as proof of age to enter a porn site. It's a requirement some sites make, and I think it's too risky to give that information to sites I know little about, or to payment processors I know little about. | |
|
||
| 01-05-10 05:47am - 5465 days | #18 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
When I have complained about the jerky quality of the hand-held camera style in movies in recent years to my friends, they look at me as if I'm weird. Don't I enjoy the special effects or whatever the hell is supposed to be happening on the big screen? My problem is that I can't really understand or see clearly what is happening, especially when the lighting is low, and the action is so fast and jumbled together and whatever. I mean, I realize that it's supposed to represent fast, explosive action, but I would like to see it more clearly so I could enjoy it. Separately, I also have the older Clash of the Titans on DVD, and rewatch it occasionally. It's a cute movie. Not great, but enjoyable. I was a fan of Octavia Butler from her first books, the Patternmaster series. James Tiptree Jr. was also a fine science fiction writer. Edited on Jan 05, 2010, 03:23pm | |
|
||
| 01-03-10 10:39pm - 5467 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The truth shall set you free. Never try to hide a falsehood from the sharp eyes of the PU community. Twilight Parts 1 and 2 made a ton of money. But that doesn't mean they would appeal to the average PU member. | |
|
||
| 01-03-10 07:04pm - 5467 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
At the end of the Iron Man I movie, Tony Stark already revealed that he is Iron Man. He did that at a press conference. So he doesn't have a secret identity, unless they use a special gas that causes amnesia in everyone, or unless they reveal that part of the movie was just a dream sequence, or use some other special device to change what happened, which movies sometimes do. I enjoyed the 1980s Clash of the Titans. The new one should be quite different because Ray Harryhausen isn't creating the monsters, and the storyline is being rewritten. Twilight Parts 1 and 2 both seemed very slow to me, aimed at the teen girl audience. I think I saw the original Dracula, Frankenstein, and Wolfman movies in the theaters, but obviously not on their first run. I also watched them on TV, and found them scary when I was younger. But the trailer for the new Wolfman movie did not impress me. I liked An American Werewolf in London (1981) by John Landis, but in spite of Anthony Hopkins and Benicio Del Toro and some other fine actors, I am not expecting much from this remake and will wait to watch it on DVD. I agree that Alice and the new Denzel Washington movie could be very good. | |
|
||
| 01-03-10 03:18pm - 5467 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The JustTeenSite animation was really annoying. I would try to look at part of the page, and the stupid animation would get in the way and I would have to play around with the mouse to try to see what I was looking for on the page. I wanted to pick up my monitor and throw it against the wall at times because of this effect, which would have been even more stupid. As I get older, I find that I am losing my patience. | |
|
||
| 01-03-10 03:12pm - 5467 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Major upcoming films for the first half of 2010: (I don't really see much that appeals to me, and what I do see as possibly appealing, I will probably wait to view as a DVD.) From Yahoo: http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.reut...8KHp5FvaGQE8Vj5fVXcA January: The four-day Martin Luther King holiday weekend (January 15-18) is the New Year's first shot at beefy box office business. Warner Bros. hopes to score with "The Book of Eli." Directed by Albert and Allen Hughes ("Menace II Society"), it's a post-apocalyptic action-adventure starring Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman. However: Will audiences want another post-apocalyptic vision? WB's thriller "Edge of Darkness" (January 29) could end January with a blast as Mel Gibson returns to action with Martin Campbell ("Casino Royale") directing. Gibson's a Boston homicide detective whose daughter's been murdered. However: How bright is Gibson's post-DUI star power? February: Fox's fantasy adventure "Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief" arrives February 12. Directed by Chris Columbus ("Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone"), its ensemble cast is led by Pierce Brosnan and Uma Thurman. Percy (Logan Lerman) is Poseidon's son and on a quest to return Zeus's stolen lightning bolt. However: The "Percy" books were written for juveniles. Can the movie pull in older teens? New Line has the perfectly titled romantic comedy for Valentine's Day in "Valentine's Day," directed by Garry Marshall ("Pretty Woman") with an ensemble cast including Jessicas Alba and Biehl. Its intertwining tales of L.A. romance should be a magnet for women dragging their husbands and dates. However: It's tough to engage audiences with multiple storylines. Moviegoers can set sail February 19 for Paramount's "Shutter Island." Directed by Martin Scorsese ("The Departed"), the thriller stars Leonardo Di Caprio. "Shutter," originally set for release in 2009, has the weekend to itself, a good sign that competing studios expect it to do well. However: Will it play too adult? March: March should come in like a lion with Disney's 3D "Alice in Wonderland" (March 5). Directed by Tim Burton ("Edward Scissorhands"), it stars Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter. Mia Wasikowska plays 19-year-old Alice falling down the rabbit hole once again. However: Will audiences warm to Burton's idiosyncratic vision? March should go out like a two-headed lion. Family audiences will head March 26 to DreamWorks and Paramount's 3D animated "How to Train Your Dragon" with the voices of Gerard Butler and America Ferrera. However: It's an original and family audiences gravitate to the familiar. The male action crowd will check out Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures' fantasy adventure "Clash of the Titans." Sam Worthington plays Perseus, who's trying to save his family from Hades (Ralph Fiennes) and wants to seize power from Zeus (Liam Neeson). However: Will audiences want more mythology after "Percy?" April: Fox could make big money with "Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps" (April 23). Directed by Oliver Stone ("Wall Street"), it stars Michael Douglas and Shia LaBeouf. However: It's 23 years since the original opened and they may have had enough of real-life Wall Street shenanigans! The month should end on a lively note April 30 with New Line's "A Nightmare on Elm Street," starring Jackie Earle Haley as Freddie Krueger. However: How many visits to Elm Street do moviegoers want to make? May: The pre-summer box office should start sizzling May 7 with Paramount and Marvel Entertainment's "Iron Man 2," directed by Jon Favreau ("Iron Man"). Robert Downey Jr. returns as Tony Stark/Iron Man and Gwyneth Paltrow is back as Pepper Potts. The original grossed $318 million domestically after opening May 2, 2008 to $99 million. However: Nothing to worry about here. Universal has a brand-name action-adventure in "Robin Hood" (May 14). Directed by Ridley Scott ("Gladiator"), it stars Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett and may wind up in 3D. However: Do you still believe in Russell Crowe and in tights, no less? DreamWorks and Paramount have May 21 all to themselves with the 3D animated family franchise "Shrek Forever After." Its all-star voices include Cameron Diaz, Mike Myers, Julie Andrews, Antonio Banderas, Eddie Murphy and Jon Hamm. However: Is there still a compelling story to tell? Memorial Day weekend kicks off May 28 with Disney and Jerry Bruckheimer's male fantasy action-adventure "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time." Directed by Mike Newell ("Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire"), it stars Jake Gyllenhaal. However: It's an original, which is never easy, but its roots are in a video game, which means it could pull in the fanboys. It also will be girls night out thanks to New Line's "Sex and the City 2." Director Michael Patrick King reteams with Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, Cynthia Nixon and Chris Noth. This time they're on the road to Morocco. However: Did the original provide all the closure that fans of the series needed? June: The summer box office heats up June 18 with Disney and Pixar's 3D animated family franchise "Toy Story 3." Tom Hanks and Tim Allen return to voice Woody and Buzz Lightyear. However: Is there still life in this story? Teen and tween girls will turn out June 30 for Summit's "Twilight Saga: The Eclipse," starring Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Bryce Dallas Howard. The franchise's last episode "New Moon" grossed $280 million so it's a safe bet that as July 4 approaches Hollywood will be seeing the kind of box office fireworks it most enjoys. | |
|
||
| 01-03-10 02:55pm - 5467 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm sure most people would hate to look up/write a password to most sites. There are some free programs that are supposed to create and store unique passwords for each site, but I've never used any of them. I use Firefox as my browser, because I've heard too many horror stories about the poor security of IE. The first time you log onto a site that requires a password, Firefox will ask if you want Firefox to remember the password. The options are (this is from memory, so it's not the exact wording): 1. save the username/password 2. not now for save the username/password 3. never for save the username/password I either select "save the username/password", which means firefox will automatically enter them for that site in the future; Or I select "not now for save the username/password", which means that firefox will ask me the 3 options each time I go to that site. Very rarely, I choose the "never for save the username/password". I do that for sensitive sites like a bank or credit card, where I don't want the information (username/password) stored on my PC, because I believe there are expert hackers out there that can possibly get information from my PC even though I run a firewall and anti-virus program. I use my PC at home, it's a desktop, but I've read stories where hackers can get your credit card information or bank information and really mess you up. | |
|
||
| 01-02-10 08:27am - 5468 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I believe that's what I wrote in my comment, using different words. The better PU reviews will give you an idea of a site's value to you, but that's only an idea or approximation: You have to join the site itself to get the specific value of the site to you, and then you can know whether the membership was a worthwhile purchase or a disappointment. But you should be able to cross off the list many sites as not worth joining by reading the reviews. Maybe a few of the sites might be borderline acceptable, but why bother with them when you are looking for good-to-great sites? As for personal taste, it differs. But surely you've found some PU members that write reviews that agree with your basic opinion of different sites. You've joined a huge number of different sites, I assume you've read the reviews posted at PU on most of those sites, so you've gotten an idea of how well some PU members agree with your personal tastes of porn. I'm not saying we are all clones of each other, or that there are only a few prototypes for personal taste, but when you read the reviews of at least a few PU members that you share a similar taste with, even though you might not agree with every detail of their review, you do find some common ground, and that increases the value of their site review, because you can use their review as a very approximate guide to what your own opinion will be. Just a guide, not an exact value, you still have to form your own opinion on the site. But even the people with similar tastes will still form their own opinion of the exact value of a site. That's my viewpoint, anyway. | |
|
||
| 01-01-10 03:21pm - 5469 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
There are very few sites that I really love. Met-art is the one I love the best. But I am still searching for other sites that I can hopefully enjoy or really like, that I can pay the 1-month fee and feel that it's money well spent. Met-art is great, but I still want a little variety, or else I just get bored. Regarding RB's disappointment when he ventures off his list of favorites, that's part of the price you pay when searching for something new. PU helps increase the odds that what you sign up for, that's new, is not a complete waste of money, because the site reviews should give you a basic understanding of what each site offers. You still need to join a site to determine its real value to you, but after reading a review, you should have a pretty good idea whether the site is worth your while. | |
|
||
| 12-28-09 12:31pm - 5473 days | #193 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Doesn't a similar argument apply to the director of what used to be called a cartoon, but is now an animated feature? Because of the tremendous amounts of money these cartoons can earn (Finding Nemo, $340 million U.S. box office alone, not counting foreign box office, DVD sales, etc.), these cartoon are big business and command serious respect. Is the director really talking to the cartoon characters and telling them what to do and say? I'm not sure what the director is doing in a cartoon. But supposedly, James Cameron was all over the place in the making of Avatar. I think the movie is regarded as his baby, and he was responsible for creating/making the movie, whatever that means. I guess we would have to take a couple of college courses in directing to understand the technical background of modern movie-making. I mean, in the olden days, a director told the actors what to do. But in a carton/animated feature, what is the specific responsibility of the director? | |
|
||
| 12-28-09 01:13am - 5473 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
86-year-old governor of Indian state resigns after a sex tape of him in bed with 3 women is shown on TV news. Was he able to satisfy all 3 of the women, or did he leave them hanging? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34599073/ns/...rld_news-weird_news/ Governor, 86, resigns over 3-woman sex tape Women's rights groups hold protests; official's office calls TV broadcast fake By OMER FAROOQ Associated Press Writer updated 9:47 p.m. PT, Sat., Dec . 26, 2009 HYDERABAD, India - The 86-year-old governor of a southern Indian state resigned, a day after a television news channel broadcast a tape allegedly showing him in bed with three women. Pressure mounted on Gov. Narain Dutt Tiwari to quit after the tape allegedly showing him in bed with three women was broadcast Friday, prompting the opposition and women's right groups to hold street protests in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh's state capital, demanding his resignation. Tiwari's office denied the allegation, denouncing the tape as fabricated. Tiwari, a veteran governing Congress party leader at the national level, sent his resignation letter to the Indian president on Saturday, citing health reasons, a state official said on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to talk to reporters. "The news channel report is fabricated, false and malicious to tarnish the image of the governor," said a statement issued by Aryendra Sharma, an aide to the governor. The three women were brought to Hyderabad by another woman who was allegedly promised a mining lease by the governor in return for sexual favors, ABN Andhra Jyoti News reported. The woman said she decided to expose Tiwari through a sting operation after he did not keep his promise, the channel said. A court stopped the channel from broadcasting the tape again later Friday after a petition filed by Sharma, who argued the video was "likely to demean and denigrate his office." Tiwari earlier served as the top elected official of northern Uttar Pradesh and Uttrakhand states and as a federal minister. Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. | |
|
||
| 12-27-09 11:12pm - 5474 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Probably the best piece of advice so far comes from PinkPanther: "I'm sorry but I have a sock drawer to clean." Edit: Is there a copyright on that quote? I'm thinking of using it for my signature line. | |
|
||
| 12-27-09 02:27pm - 5474 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm not real big on church-going. But there are all kinds of churches out there. It's true that churches need money to function. But some churches seem to be more into taking a lot of money or as much as they can get from their membership than other churches. I don't want to name names of specific churches, because it's too easy to get people's emotions riled up on a topic like this. But there are many churches out there where the emphasis is not on taking money from the membership, but in providing a communal organization, in providing human companionship (I'm not talking specifically about counseling, but that could be included), along with teaching about God. It's also true that someone who is obsessive can get caught up in a church beyond what is reasonable: Jim Jones and the Kool-Aid is one simple example. But there are good churches out there that offer human companionship along with the worship of God (which you can make up your own mind about how you believe in the religious part of the church). Church is only one place to spend meaningful time. But it can serve a very useful purpose in a person's personal life. Or not. That's a personal decision. But it really helps to look a church over before becoming a member. There are many churches that let you attend their services and functions and bible study and whatever, without formally joining that church. And how much you contribute to the church in financial terms should be entirely up to you. Edited on Dec 27, 2009, 02:36pm | |
|
||
| 12-27-09 12:31am - 5474 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Human nature, you can get hooked into almost anything. If you think it's a problem, try to get counseling. Or join a church group. Or try for some other activity that you think has a better payoff. | |
|
||
| 12-23-09 06:10am - 5478 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've decided that since I couldn't identify correctly a porn star that I thought I could recognize from a video clip (Kara Mynor/Shawna Lenee that I thought was Lexi Belle), I am staying away from porn star guessing games for a while. There are some porn stars that resemble each other so closely that I have a hard time telling them apart. And there are also photosets and videos where I can't recognize some porn stars that I thought I knew what they looked like, because of photoshopping, makeup, costume, whatever. | |
|
||
| 12-21-09 12:24pm - 5480 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I still think it's from an early Lexi Belle video. I've got a longer version of the same clip, where you get a much clearer, better view of the porn model and the guy who comes along to have sex with her. In my clip, you can see what the girl looks like much better than in the clip at xvideos. You can also see the guy much more clearly. He's been around a while also, in a lot of videos with different porn models. The way I mainly recognize the guy is from his chin-beard. As for Lexi Belle, I look at her face most of all, and the face in the early Lexi Belle clip I have (which is clearly shown) is approximately the same Lexi Belle face I see in a lot of other Lexi Belle clips. The longer Lexi Belle clip I have includes the clip at xvideos, but has an introductory part where Lexi is by herself, and you get a good look at her face (and body). And then the guy shows up, and they have sex in the hallway, then go into a bedroom and have more sex. The problem about recognizing Lexi Belle from the xvideos clip is that you don't see her face that clearly. There are clear shots of her face, but it's too close-up which makes the face look slightly strange from the ordinary appearance. That's why it was so much easier for me to recognize Lexi Belle, because I was basing the recognition on the longer clip, where you get a much better view of the model. As far as how Lexi Belle fucks, she is one of the many models who make a lot of fake moans and groans. It would be better if she made less noise. But I don't have a real good handle on how she fucks, because from my viewpoint, it's mainly the male guy who is controlling the action, putting her into different positions and sticking it in where he wants to, when he wants to. I'm basing this on memory, because even though I have the extended clip on my PC, I would really have to look for it to view it again, which would be time-consuming. But the clip I have is much better, because it has a slight introduction, and she is dressed in some clothes which are brightly colored, and you just get a sense of a slight story (almost none, but still better than just straight meaningless sex). | |
|
||
| 12-21-09 06:55am - 5480 days | #21 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Nella, a very pretty model who has been around a while. I certainly don't care for the photoshopping in the pic. I've seen other photosets where the photoshopping is less intrusive and she looks more attractive, more enticing, more erotic, at least for my personal taste. Playboy uses the same glossy/varnished style that detracts from the appeal of the photos. It's not a style I really appreciate, but it's been around at least since the 1960s, which is when I first started looking at Playboy magazine. | |
|
||
| 12-21-09 06:27am - 5480 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The chick in the video is Lexi Belle, who is usually a blonde. The first URL you listed leads to a 403 Forbidden error. PU often disables direct links to porn images and clips, which is why the first hot link might not be working properly. | |
|
||
| 12-21-09 12:16am - 5480 days | #17 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm also getting a "This image is copyright Protected www.pier999.com" If this is the type of image that you're getting from a paysite, I can understand your frustration. :) | |
|
||
| 12-20-09 12:53pm - 5481 days | #189 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Actress Brittany Murphy dead at 32 December 20, 2009 | 12:26 pm MURPHY Actress Brittany Murphy died early today after going into cardiac arrest, law enforcement sources said. Los Angeles city firefighters responded to "a medical request" at Murphy's home in the 1800 block of Rising Glen Road in West Hollywood. Murphy, 32, was transported to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, where she was pronounced dead. Murphy starred in films including "Clueless," "8 Mile" and "Don't Say a Word." ============================================================ She wasn't a porn actress, just a regular actress. But 32 seems a very young age to die. | |
|
||
| 12-19-09 02:54pm - 5482 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
atrapat, I agree with almost everything you say, and I believe regional pricing is unfair. But to say that Spain is a third-world country is one thing I don't agree with. Spain is part of Europe; third-world countries are supposed to be (I know I'm being politically incorrect here) backward socially and financially. Spain is one of the first-world countries (if that's a correct term). Spain might not be the world power it was back in the 1400-1500s, but it's still considered, culturally and financially, much more advanced than a third-world country. I also like your avatar. It's classy and nicely distinctive. Is it based on a cartoon character? | |
|
||
| 12-19-09 12:34pm - 5482 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Fanaticism or extremism can take many forms. I recently had a conversation with a relative who told me, in no uncertain terms, that I should never take a pain pill. I told her that if I'm in pain, and a pain pill will sometimes help reduce the pain, I was going to take the pain pill. My relative got angry and told me I was wrong, that I should just get through the pain without the pills. I figure it's easier for her to deal with my pain since she isn't the one who's feeling it. And why she was getting angry because she believes pain pills are worthless, is a sign of intolerance or stupidity, as far as I'm concerned. I wasn't telling her I was overdosing on the pain pills; instead, I told her that I sometimes took pills because my body has physical problems, which is a problem common to many people as they get older. Anyway, back on the topic of photoshopping, if it's done right, it can improve a picture. But there are many times when the photoshopping is overdone. Partially it's a matter of personal taste. But some photographers and some magazines/sites go in for strong use of photoshopping and that reduces the attractiveness/eroticism of the photos. Playboy tends to overuse photoshop/airbrush/whatever. But there are many other magazines/sites that overuse photoshop as well. There is also the use of photoshopping to give an unreal appearance to the model/photo in a deliberate manner, as an expression of art or fashion. Maybe a little bit of that might be OK or interesting, but I much prefer a more natural-appearing female model instead of one with stylized, weird-appearing skin tones. | |
|
||
| 12-19-09 12:29am - 5482 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Turboshaft, so what you're saying (loosely translated) is that Target customers are a better class of people than Wal-mart customers? Classier, and better looking. I used to think that Wal-mart was a cheapie store, even though I had never been in one. But since the 1990s, 3 large Wal-mart stores have moved into my local area, and I find that the prices at Wal-mart are often lower than what you pay at other stores like Target or supermarkets. So I am now a Wal-mart customer, and I don't feel that I am lower-class because of it. However, I do agree that the customers at Best-buy and Target are, in general, wealthier than the average customer at Wal-mart. They also dress better. OK, I think I understand where you're coming from. It just sounded a little snobbish that you reject Wal-mart as a source of future porn stars. I live a lot closer to the SF Valley than PinkPanther, but I haven't really looked around the area to see how many porn stars I could find. I probably wouldn't recognize them anyway, even if they knocked me over. I met Justine Jolie at a Glamourcon convention (sponsored by Playboy) one year, spoke with her briefly, and I kept looking at her, because she seemed familiar from somewhere. It was only later, after I went home, that I realized who she was. I wasn't drunk, but my brain sure wasn't working at top speed that day. | |
|
||
| 12-19-09 12:01am - 5482 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
That was great service from CCBill. And it really paid that you were persistent. I'd probably have given up after a couple of emails, figuring the world is a cruel, lonely place. But now we seem to have a friend in CCBill. | |
|
||
| 12-18-09 05:35pm - 5483 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
This isn't really indicative of very much. But Sylvester Stallone got his start in acting as the lead in a porn movie called Party at Kitty and Stud's. This was in 1970. Stallone hit it big in 1976 with Rocky, which made him a superstar. Marilyn Monroe was rumored to be in at least one stag film (porn films were called stag films many years ago). Experts argue for and against Marilyn Monroe appearing in stag films. The most likely one she might have been in was made around 1948. But positively identifying the actress in the stag film is not possible; the actress looks like Marilyn Monroe, but no one can say for sure if it's really her or not. Being in porn back in the 1960s and earlier was extremely stigmatic. But in today's world, people like Paris Hilton and Pamela Anderson can have sex tapes shown on the internet, and it can actually boost their careers. | |
|
||
| 12-18-09 05:10pm - 5483 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
One thing you have to recognize is that most porn performers have a thick skin. It's part of the job. If they didn't have a thick skin, they couldn't stay in the business. I realize that some porn performers do have regrets/psychological issues and end up killing themselves, but that is true of many other jobs as well, it's part of the human condition. My impression (with no solid evidence or statistics to back this up) is that porn stars/actors/performers need a thick skin. As far as being in porn barring a male or female from a regular job, I think that would be a minority issue. If a girl was a Playboy playmate, or a Penthouse pet, would that bar her from a regular job? I don't think so. Most playmates and pets try to get work as models, which might last a few years, or try to be an actress (very few playmates or pets made it beyond a few very minor roles in mainstream movies). But I don't think there is any stigma that bars these girls from a regular job. Or bars the guys from a regular job. | |
|
||
| 12-18-09 12:12pm - 5483 days | #26 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I always had great respect for both Toadsith (great technical knowledge of visual arts and a complete, concise approach to site reviews) and Patrick McGoohan (as an actor). This McGoohan avatar seems a little creepy for the Christmas holiday. Edited on Dec 18, 2009, 04:57pm | |
|
||
| 12-18-09 11:59am - 5483 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I don't know how big of a stigma there is for a girl doing porn. Back in the 1960s the stigma would have been huge. But this is 2009, and in the United States, the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s and 1970s changed the attitudes of many people as to what is allowed or socially acceptable. I'm not saying that some people won't criticize people in porn, but it's no longer as big a deal as it was back in the 1960s, when a girl being in porn meant she was a slut, whore or worse, as far as many people were concerned. Edited on Dec 18, 2009, 04:59pm | |
|
||
| 12-16-09 09:40pm - 5485 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Gateway used to be an independent company, but they fell on hard times, and are now owned by Acer. | |
|
||
| 12-15-09 02:31pm - 5486 days | #20 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Thanks to Denner, for the URL below. I finally see what the "Mr. Head-up-his-ass" avatar that Wittyguy sometimes uses was based on: http://hodja.files.wordpress.com/2008/05...udenrigsminister.jpg Edited on Dec 15, 2009, 03:44pm | |
|
||
| 12-15-09 07:47am - 5486 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Wittyguy, funniest post(s) I've read since I don't know when. Better keep your home address a secret, or the guys in white coats might come around to drag you away. You obviously have talent, and are one of the main treasures of the PU community. | |
|
||
| 12-12-09 12:52pm - 5489 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'd suggest cutting back on your porn spending. Join less sites. You would probably get more satisfaction from fewer sites, as well as save money. It's psychology. There's probably some psych terms to describe it, but you're looking through a lot of garbage to find the good stuff, and you don't really appreciate the good stuff you do find because you're jaded, less responsive to what there is. | |
|
||
| 12-09-09 12:36pm - 5492 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Congratulations on your winning. I gave you my trust vote several months ago. But the badge is nice to have. You can wear it on your hat, or on your shirt, as a proud member of PU. | |
|
||
| 12-07-09 04:13pm - 5494 days | #28 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Speak for yourself, dear boy. The quality of life is an important issue that should not be ignored. Is life without porn worth living? That is a question that deserves great thought. Without porn, this site, and TBP, would not exist. | |
|
||
| 12-06-09 12:09pm - 5495 days | #188 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
This is not a 2009 movie, but I am watching Slumdog Millionaire (2008) on DVD right now, and the movie is hilarious. Anyone who missed this movie (I know it won Oscars, but that is not much of a recommendation for me) should see it. The Amazon.com price for a new DVD of this is $7.99, eligible for free shipping. Or it's worth renting. A really funny movie, and very enjoyable. And the Indian (Indian continent, not U.S. indians) aspect gives the move an interesting flavor. | |
|
||
| 12-04-09 01:15pm - 5497 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
One of the reasons porn is valuable is that is gives you so many things to vent about. Lol. It's much easier to vent about porn than about a crappy movie or a piece of art (painting) that you don't like. But that's because there is a place like PU for us pornophiles; otherwise, we'd just have to hold our frustrations inside. Can't really complain to the neighbors or the wife, can we? | |
|
||
| 12-03-09 02:23pm - 5498 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Wikipedia article on open proxies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_proxy The article says that: "Using an open proxy can be legally dangerous: the current law in Germany, for example, makes it illegal to access a computer or network without the owner's knowledge, even if the proxy is not password-protected.[citation needed] There are no reasons to run a clean open proxy for an organisation, so any open proxy is suspicious[citation needed]. The main sign of a legal open proxy is the fact that it is not anonymizing the connection[citation needed]." Anyway, it seems there can be problems using an open proxy, both legally and as far as computer usage is concerned. Read the wikipedia article for further information, but the article itself in somewhat brief, and does not explain how to use an open proxy, or clearly state the problems of using one. We need someone who is computer literate to explain simply, how and when and why an open proxy should or could be used by someone. | |
|
||
| 12-03-09 12:48pm - 5498 days | #11 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
One problem about discounting scores for regional pricing is that if you live in the US, you aren't normally aware of regional pricing (higher prices outside of the US) unless you read a post by some PU member. Normally, all you see is the US membership price quotes for most sites, if you are located in the US. The PU/TBP prices shown are mainly for the US. And the prices shown at the porn sites themselves, for US customers, are mainly the US prices, not including the regional pricing for outside the US. So if you aren't aware of the difference between US and non-US prices, you are not likely to factor that into a lower score for the site. | |
|
||
| 12-03-09 11:11am - 5498 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Changing internet address: There are free programs that will change the internet address that your computer shows. I've heard about them, but have never used one, and don't know how well they work, or if there are any problems associated with changing your IP address. The best way to try solving the problem is probably Khan's idea, to contact your ISP and explain the problem to them. If that doesn't work, then you might try one of the free programs that change your IP address (trying to figure out beforehand if that might somehow cause other problems, because computers can be tricky, and you can mess up the way they work when you add programs or change settings). Or maybe you can just change the IP address on your computer directly, without any special programs, but, again, you need to be cautious about any problems that might cause (which is not extremely helpful advice, because we are not computer experts, and we don't know what the problems will be until they rise up and clunk you in the head or clunk you in the computer). | |
|
||
| 12-02-09 07:13am - 5499 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
One easy way to increase the membership at PU: Make Rick's avatar more closely resemble Brad Pitt from the movie Troy. Also make Khan's avatar more closely resemble Rose Byrne. There's a great picture of Bradd and Rose from Troy, both topless and in each other's arms, that should do wonders for increasing the attention paid to PU. The picture can be found at: http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributo...0026573/photo/522708 Edit: Would that be false advertising? Edited on Dec 02, 2009, 07:18am | |
|
||
| 12-02-09 06:33am - 5499 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't pay a whole lot of attention to most porn review sites, because their reviews are mostly puff pieces that highly recommend most sites. I find the reviews and comment at PU are more useful as an indicator of a site's possible value to me. The reviews at TBP can sometimes add a little information about a site to me, but I mainly use PU to decide whether a site might be worth joining. Regarding the site scores that TBP gives out, I look at them, but give them very little weight in my decision on whether to join a site or not. Again, the reviews and comments at PU are more meaningful to me than the reviews at TBP. The TBP reviews are supposed to be "professional", written to a guideline that establishes the quality and utility of the reviews, but the PU reviews, in spite of the very uneven quality, are more dependable. I think one reason is that PU reviews are written by the consumer, someone who is actually paying for a subscription to the site. TBP reviews are written by "professional" reviewers who are being paid to review a site, and not by someone who is writing about how well they like or appreciate a site based on their reaction to the site. Personal taste varies wildly, but the review of a professional wine taster about a particular wine has very little real-life meaning to me (especially since I don't like wine, anyway). I do like porn, but even the reviews at TBP, which I feel are better than most porn site reviews, seem to have an overlay of speciousness. Edited on Dec 02, 2009, 06:37am | |
|
||
| 11-29-09 07:20am - 5502 days | #13 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
There are many solo model sites with extremely attractive models. But when I spend my porn dollars, I spend them on sites like metart, mpl studios, domai, just teen site, etc. You don't get the closeness of a single model, but you do get a variety of models and photographers. For me, it's just better value for the money to join a mega-site instead of a solo site. | |
|
||
| 11-16-09 07:49pm - 5515 days | #22 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
After watching some of the advertisement for the RealTouch machine, my first thoughts are that it might be easier to have a sex-change operation to become a female, and then use the Sybian machine, because the Sybian machine has already been developed to provide sexual gratification. I keep wondering if there isn't the danger of electrocution trying to use this RealTouch machine. I would hate to fry my do-hingy while trying to get off. | |
|
||
| 3251-3300 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 12 | 22 | 32 | 42 | 52 | 65 | Page 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
|
