|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
LPee23 (0)
|
| 301-350 of 403 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Page 7 | 8 | 9 | Next Page > |
| 06-06-14 02:09pm - 3852 days | #35 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User  Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
This hints at a valid point. AB1576 should at least have an exception for real couples. I understand how workplace protections have a firm basis in law, but what about amateur couples, maybe even married couples, who want to shoot content for their own small scale operations? I'm sure those scenarios must have been considered, and yet there is no sort of exception in the bill? I know workplace protections are important, but so is freedom of artistic expression. HIV tests are accurate when used properly. The law should require adequate testing for HIV and other STDs like gonorrhea and chlamydia, but it shouldn't bar performers who test negative from performing bareback together. Yeah, it could be argued that producers may cut corners on the testing, but they are equally free to cut corners on using condoms. If only AB1576 could mandate adequate testing, without treading all over freedom of artistic expression by requiring condoms, then both sides might have a nice compromise. The bottom line is that testing alone is adequate. Companies who cut corners on testing can just as easily cut corners on condom use, with the same risk of repercussions. Many are going to edit the condoms out - think green screen chroma key condoms - so it won't be so easy to check compliance just by looking at the videos. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Jun 06, 2014, 02:19pm | |
|
||
| 06-02-14 05:27pm - 3856 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Maybe you can hit the California sites up for their behind the scenes, unedited footage when they start using CGI to edit out the condoms  This applies more for the sex for now, but still, good luck! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 06-02-14 03:47pm - 3856 days | #15 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Speaking of drunk girl porn, looks like WDGirls.com (Wild & Drunk girls) is closed to new members now. It was an awesome Russian site, actually very high quality, too bad it didn't live long enough to get its first review here. Anyway, I bet it's just coincidence that it closed now, because the models did supposedly sign contracts, but you never know. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-27-14 03:52am - 3862 days | #18 | ||
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I've always wondered, was that the case with Ga1itsin's stuff for MetArt and Ga1itsin-news? I've always avoided it because I didn't know for sure that it was legit. I know he had charges leveled against him in Russia in 2008, but never learned the outcome of the case.
My issue is that the credit card companies don't seem to do this in a very sensible way, and they go after content that is safe and consensual. In the three instances that I am aware of them pushing for self-censorship, they were way over the line. One is the case of a small fetish photographer who likes to shoot pee fetish stuff, but can't post golden showers on his site because of credit card processor rules. Another example is a site that combined S&M, role play, and peeing in a way even more extreme than Kink.com. Credit card processors basically forced them to remove almost all of their original shoots with any kind of nudity or S&M, and they are pretty soft now. The third example is the article on XBiz.com that I quoted earlier: "Even though rough sex producer Intersec Studios company spokesman Dixon agreed with Rowntree's take that content is limited to credit card processors' censorship (the site avoids content like peeing on other people, blood or fecal matter), the content on its sites including SexuallyBroken.com, InfernalRestraints.com and (rigging site) Hardtied.com's, among others, can be considered extreme even in today's market." I don't think golden showers belong in this list. That's just my take. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | ||
|
|||
| 05-26-14 05:58pm - 3863 days | #14 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
The weird thing is, this seems to be the attitude of credit card processors towards many sites. Then there are the handful that say their payment processors are forcing them to remove certain "offending" content. It seems to be totally inconsistent. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-26-14 09:38am - 3863 days | #12 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Just saw a quad anal scene on FuckingMachines.com. That's 4 full sized dildos attached to the moving arm of a modified SawzAll. Holy shit! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-26-14 07:07am - 3863 days | #10 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
To further substantiate my suspicion here, I had a look at their published content guidelines. Their guidelines do not allow person to person peeing. They do allow most squirting, but not long squirts that may be mistaken for pee. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-25-14 05:51pm - 3864 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Love 'em or hate 'em, I think they're soon to be a thing of the past. It's kind of amazing that they can continue to operate, but don't think that things will stay that way forever. Would I personally walk down a nude beach and snap photos? No. Would I want to be one of those creepy "bird-watchers" offshore with a telephoto lens? No. Do the majority of the women already baring it all at a nude beach know that this stuff goes on? Yes. Most do not care. That being said, with new regulations coming, the sites with true voyeur content and no documented consent will have a tough time. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on May 25, 2014, 05:56pm | |
|
||
| 05-25-14 07:54am - 3864 days | #9 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
This also from Kink's Acworth last week, from the same article that mentioned the credit card guidelines: "And although the knee-jerk reaction by those new to the genre would be to push the limits of content to new extremes in order to titillate new paying customers, Acworth said in fact his company may be "retiring" some of its most extreme lines in favor of appealing to a more mainstream audience." Reading between the lines here, I wouldn't be surprised if he is referring to pissing.com. It hasn't updated in years, and it's all about golden showers. If you're at all interested in this site, I'd join it while it's still around. It's only got just over 50 videos, and you can download everything in 2-3 hours. It seems like the site has a small core of content that they meant to build on, but then just never updated. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-25-14 07:48am - 3864 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I'm not into sites like this, but you would be surprised how many I have stumbled across. They're mostly European, but some use some recognizable payment processors. It's amazing that sites like this can get away with it while other sites get censored for having golden showers or rough but consensual S&M. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-24-14 12:35pm - 3865 days | #11 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Yeah, I know he's a vocal opponent. He did say the rules were "proposed," so for all we know they could have been immediately shot down too. Anyway, maybe it's a good thing that we have some differing opinions here, it makes for interesting discussion. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-24-14 08:22am - 3865 days | #9 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Here's the article that I'm citing on XBiz.com, it's an interview with Peter Acworth, owner of Kink.com. http://www.xbiz.com/news/179601 Here's the part that I'm citing: "XBIZ: If the bill does pass, do you think the AIDS Healthcare Foundation will take a continuing vigilant role and become chief complainant over shoots? ACWORTH: Yes. One aspect of AB 1576 is the record-keeping. A complaint from AHF to Cal/OSHA would give access to these records to Cal/OSHA for their agenda. As you know, proposed Cal/OSHA draft regulations include protection of eyes and condoms for oral. These new regs would be very easily and quickly enforceable with this new record-keeping in place and that is where I see this going." I guess you are technically right. The bill itself is not calling for protective eyewear, but the Cal/OSHA regulations being drafted in parallel to the bill apparently are. The bill will require compliance with the Cal/OSHA regulations, so the effect will be the same. Granted, these are just drafts according to Acworth, but still. Protective eyewear? Come on. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-24-14 08:02am - 3865 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
"I'm also hamstrung by rules from credit card companies on the golden shower thing. I'm not supposed to have that in my clips store and even Verotel won't approve it (I can sneak it in here and there but I can't have a site devoted to GS and piss drinking)." This just yesterday from a fetish photographer on a forum. I can think of tons of sites that break this rule, in the US and elsewhere, but maybe they've just escaped notice. I'd rather not potentially blow their cover by naming them here, but there are a lot. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-23-14 07:23pm - 3865 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Read this on XBiz.com today: "Due to a lot of ever-evolving restrictions by the credit card associations on what can and cannot be shown in an S&M film, a lot of the "extreme" content producers found it very difficult to create realistic and compelling BDSM content and moved over into simply "rough sex" genres," Rowntree explained. The change in some ways has actually decreased competition and has, "thankfully" taken BDSM film making back towards its roots of "safe, sane and consensual" according to Rowntree." "Even though rough sex producer Intersec Studios company spokesman Dixon agreed with Rowntree's take that content is limited to credit card processors' censorship (the site avoids content like peeing on other people, blood or fecal matter), the content on its sites including SexuallyBroken.com, InfernalRestraints.com and (rigging site) Hardtied.com's, among others, can be considered extreme even in today's market." I have always been curious, what exactly are the guidelines that credit card companies try to impose? Would any of the webmasters here who have had experience with this be able to clarify? I would be really curious to know the details. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on May 23, 2014, 07:26pm | |
|
||
| 05-23-14 06:33pm - 3866 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
The bill as drafted calls not only for condoms for oral but for protective eye wear to be worn according to XBiz.com. There has never in history been a case of HIV transmitted by contact of semen with the mucus membranes of the eyes. Not one. As far as transmission of HIV through mucus membranes aside from the genitals go, there is one controversial case of transmission by kissing that has been reported, and that is it. Yes it is theoretically possible if the mucus membranes are damaged, but it is a remote, outside possibility. The requirement for protective eye wear is clearly not based on science and it is not imposed in good faith. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-23-14 06:24pm - 3866 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
It shouldn't even really be called revenge porn - more aptly it's extortion. The porn part is an afterthought. It's mostly about doing psychological harm to the victims and extracting money from them. These assholes are giving porn a bad name. If I could delete all their bullshit from the internet with the push of a button, you can bet that I would. These revenge porn assholes have generated so much bad press that there's federal revenge porn legislation coming down the pipeline soon. Hopefully they draft it in a reasonable way, but more likely it will have unintended consequences. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-22-14 07:20pm - 3866 days | #12 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Rumor has it that all the old Max Hardcore videos just might live on as a bonus on a certain network. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-18-14 02:56pm - 3871 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
This is a really interesting case that I have been thinking about. You can't defend copyright trolls who abuse the system, but porn producers do need some way to prevent losses from excessive piracy. Prenda was definitely a troll, if you are familiar with that case. Is Malibu Media really a troll though, or are they just defending their product by using the system the way it was designed? Remember when SOPA/PIPA were being pushed through the US house and senate? I think everyone here was probably opposed to them. What SOPA/PIPA opponents like me argued for was to use the existing system to go after individual infringers, rather than censor the internet in broad strokes at the DNS level. If you believe their claims, then Malibu Media is doing nothing more than that. When I hear the music and motion picture industries come out against piracy, I am generally not sympathetic. They continue to make huge and ever increasing profits despite pervasive copyright infringement. While shoveling in the cash, they still campaign to reduce internet freedoms in the name of stopping piracy. This is unacceptable. The porn industry, on the other hand, did not generally come out lobbying in favor of SOPA and PIPA. With a couple of exceptions, they did not adopt DRM like the motion picture industry does and the music industry once did. And they are not making outsized profits. Some sites are, but others are being decimated by the current market environment. The porn industry has been hit the hardest, and yet they have by far been the most reasonable with their customers. There are a few specific points about Malibu Media that you could criticize, such as the reliability of identifying an individual based on an IP address, and the high dollar value that they seek in their settlements. I will say that those are questionable practices. But in general, I feel that either the current system of enforcement will have to work as designed, or we will end up with something much worse, like another SOPA/PIPA, down the road. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-14-14 02:59pm - 3875 days | #30 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I've thought about stuff like this too, but then decided I'd rather spend that time looking at new porn. Good luck to you though, it is about time for an app like this. It's useful to know Python, even if the app turns out to be too ambitious of a project. Once I thought how nice it would be to have an app to find duplicate photos in my collection. Then I waited a few years, and someone else made that exact app. Whether you make this app yourself or not, it is a good idea, and I think eventually we will have something like this. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-13-14 07:05pm - 3876 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I can say that Epoch is pretty commonplace, and I've never had any trouble with canceling dozens of memberships through them. Never really had any problems that I can trace to a specific payment processor to be honest. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-11-14 02:46pm - 3878 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Yes, recently I had similar trouble, but I was able to sort things out in my case, and there was no scam involved. I had my credit card number stolen a few weeks ago, so the bank had to issue me a new one. Every time I purchased a membership with the new card, whether through CCBill or other payment processors, it would not go through and my account would get frozen until I called their fraud detection department to give it the OK. I would also have to be on the phone with the bank while I resubmitted the transactions that I wanted. It's an awkward phone conversation, but they were very pleasant and professional about it. One site was set up to automatically try an alternate payment processor if CCBill failed, and I think that is what you were encountering too. With each of the transactions, I was told the merchant code associated with it was automatically blocked for being "high risk" and associated with fraud. "High risk" is the banking euphemism for porn, payday lending, gambling, firearms, etc. As for associated with fraud, it's true that porn sites get a lot of charge backs, and the banks use charge backs as a metric of fraud, but most of the time it's not the porn sites that are responsible. There are unfortunately customers who try to scam sites by getting a membership, downloading like mad for a day or two, then getting their money back through a charge back. Also husbands who get caught by the wife, teens who used their parents' card, etc. Anyway, I knew the owner very well at the site in question, so without batting an eye at the mention of fraud, I said to put the charge through. Unfortunately, this site used Paylets, and they always seem to take a couple of hours to go though, so I couldn't stay on the phone to okay the charge. They said they could flag my account to expect "unusual activity" and it might go through later. It did finally go through, and now I don't get my account frozen with each additional membership either. I'm pretty sure my old card with my original account number was flagged for "unusual activity" for years too, because I used to get a call from the bank each time I purchased a membership, but then when the calls got a bit repetitive, they totally stopped and I had no more issues. That being said, I did not actually get billed for the memberships that didn't go through, nor did I have to contact the payment processors themselves. So you might be dealing with some additional problems too. Good luck! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-04-14 10:05am - 3885 days | #20 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Without saying too much, if my porn habits were widely known, it would be a scandal of sorts. I'm still pretty young at 30, but I also wonder what will happen to my collection when I eventually go. Will it come to light and what will other people think? Yeah, digital porn is easier to hide, but nine 4 Tb hard drives are kind of hard to overlook. Will it be wiped or will it somehow find a new home? This is where a "porn buddy" can come into play, at least in theory. A porn buddy is a friend who you make an agreement with that if you die unexpectedly, they will come and discreetly pick up your porn collection to either get rid of or keep. The agreement is generally mutual among "porn buddies." It's a concept that's been thrown around online, but I'm not sure if anyone's actually done it. In order for it to work, your porn buddy would obviously have to be a close real-world friend who your family would recognize and trust inside of your home. This is where the practicality of "porn buddies" falls short. For kicks, I'm going to tell my wife about the "porn buddies" idea now and see what she thinks. She watches porn too, but her interests are more mainstream than me, and I don't think she would know what to do with pee fetish porn from over 600 sites and other sources. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-04-14 09:30am - 3885 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
That's a good point. One month only memberships aren't what most sites are really looking for. If they come through affiliates that take 50%, sites can even lose money on those memberships under some circumstances. I'd take a last chance opportunity to join a site even for twice the price or more though personally. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 05-03-14 05:25pm - 3886 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I was meaning to check out SydneyMoon.com for a while, actually just looked at it a month ago and it was still there. Now it's still online, but only existing members can log in, you can't join anymore, and it's about to go offline. Here's what makes no sense to me. Why don't these sites announce it ahead of time when they are closing? Don't they want the extra cash from a "liquidation sale?" Don't you think they'd get tons of business if they just said, "Hey I'm closing in a month, so this is the last chance to check me out?" I'd even join a site pretty close to the bottom of my list if I knew it would be my last chance, just out of curiosity. There should be a place for sites to announce this ahead of time, alert their fans, and make some extra money before going out of business. Even something as simple as a subreddit dedicated to this. Any thoughts? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-26-14 06:15pm - 3893 days | #13 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Prostitution in the DR goes both ways. I read in an article once that in the little recognized world of female sex tourism - that is, women traveling and willing to pay for sex - the DR is the world's top destination. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-26-14 04:09pm - 3893 days | #16 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
What do you use as; 1. Picture Viewer: 2. Video Player (wmv, mpeg, dvix, avi, qt) 3. Download Manager Photos 4. Download Manager Videos 5. File Management Tool 1. Navigation Pane in Windows Explorer or Windows Photo Viewer 2. VLC 3. BulkImageDownloader 4. Just the download manager in Firefox 5. Windows Explorer I also have a question for you guys. Do any of you know a really great download manager for photos? BulkImageDownloader is okay, but it doesn't work on all sites, which leaves me having to click through all of the thumbnails by hand. I still haven't tired of the hunt and putting in the long hours, but I would still like a better solution. A download manager where you can configure or script the way it crawls a site would be ideal. I really need something to save me some time, because I'm taking a promotion in about a month, and it means I'll start working very long hours. I'll have less time to surf the net no matter what, but anything to speed things up will help. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-23-14 03:29pm - 3896 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Do any of you have any experience with identity theft protection services? I'm assuming they get to see your bank records, so they must know if you are subscribing to porn. I'm just asking because there was recently a large data breach where I work with thousands of employee's data being compromised. They don't think my data was affected, but it's hard to say for sure. My employer is offering a free identity theft protection service through a third party, but I am hesitant to sign up. It would be a disaster of epic proportions if my porn habits were known. Any thoughts or advice? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-23-14 03:03pm - 3896 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I'm almost positive. Despite the official ban, porn is not hard to find in China. Here's the latest update on the crackdown in an article from xbiz.com: http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece.php?...p;mi=all&q=china Apparently, their demands for self-censorship by tech companies has actually impacted the tech sector in China and even the overall Chinese stock market. This is not a joke or an article from The Onion. OK, I honestly don't know how they did this analysis, they just say there is a "consensus," but who knows? That being said, they have only closed 100 Chinese sites and delete 200,000 files this year. Judging from the low number of files per site closed, most of the sites were probably blogs. A single large pay site can have more than 200,000 files. Keep up the good work in China! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-21-14 08:09pm - 3897 days | #7 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I went to a mainstream DR resort once. As soon as I was checked into my room, the host asked if I wanted any women, pot, or O. I didn't personally take him up on any of that, but I can't say that was true of everyone I was with. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-21-14 04:19pm - 3898 days | #10 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
This is so overpriced. Most models on clips4sale.com will do a custom video for $100, but I won't pay that. Allow me to let those who are so inclined in on a secret. Sinna from 2pee4you at http://clips4sale.com/2pee4you does them for free. Well, not really for free, but close to it. If you nicely make a request, she generally does her best to make a video. That part is free of charge. Then she will post the video for anywhere from $5-30 for download. Not a bad deal, considering she gets incredibly kinky. I once bought an entire pee site that was closed for years for $1,500, including 60,000 pics and videos. Unfortunately, due to not having the right of publicity from the models, I can't bring it back online, but it is one of the proudest parts of my private collection. $2,000 for a video is way too much. $42,000? You could literally buy several entire sites for that if you knew where to look. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-21-14 04:05pm - 3898 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I respect that. I've been in similar situations, in fact, I just heard back from a certain webmaster 4 months after emailing her. I held back on bad mouthing her, because she runs a tiny site from the early 2000's that I joined mostly for sentimental value, and I just couldn't bring myself to do it. I'm still a little bit confused about your problem, because I don't know of a browser that returns "network error message" when it encounters problems. Usually they provide more information. Also, let me reiterate that you should contact the biller. Not only does it set you up for a refund if you decide to go that route, but the webmaster is more likely to respond to an email from the biller than from you. The biller will not want to give you a refund, so they will usually try to contact the webmaster themselves in these situations. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-20-14 04:43pm - 3899 days | #2 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
First of all, which site it this? What do you mean by legit? Are they a major network? Sorry for stating the obvious, but first things first, make sure to check your spam folder. What do you mean by a "network error message?" Which browser or download manager are you using? Which OS are you running? When customer service doesn't answer your emails, there honestly isn't much you can do. Sometimes if you wait, they may reply a month or so later. You can contact Epoch though, because unanswered emails from support are a valid cause to ask for a refund. If Epoch also can't reach support, they should give you your money back. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-20-14 06:38am - 3899 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I think you are right on graymane. No doubt many officials let the porn distributors keep doing what they do in exchange for a kickback, and what better than a choice collection of porn? In all seriousness, I have no doubt that this must happen. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-19-14 05:18pm - 3900 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
No, they actually mean 3.4 million files. It's staggering how little that amounts to. What a great and effective use of the people's resources! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-15-14 06:10pm - 3904 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Yet another year in China's quest to "clean" the internet of porn. It's efforts are so appreciated. They boasted that in 2012 they deleted 3.4 million files, well that sounds like a lot, but it's not when you consider how much porn is actually online, and that most of the files they deleted probably were backed up many other places. My own collection alone has about 2 million when you count all images individually. Here's the latest development in China's quest to clean the internet. WARNING: This image is graphic and disturbing.  It may be painful to look at. You say you're a seasoned porn afficionado and you've seen it all? Then this applies ESPECIALLY to you! Scroll down at your own risk.  Yes, that is a mountain of porn DVD's being steamrolled. They could have just asked me, and I would have taken that off their hands. Oh well, maybe next time. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-14-14 04:46pm - 3905 days | #11 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Oh, I'm totally with you. The only person I feel inclined to share porn with in person is my wife. Then again, I have gone to strip clubs with friends and colleagues, and it's just been fun, not awkward at all. At the same time, strip clubs can't deliver on my personal tastes like porn can. I'm not saying that the anonymity that the internet has given us is a bad thing at all - I love it. I'm just saying that the experience of finding your first Playboy or whatever and sharing it with your friends is not so relevant today with so much online porn, so therefore porn is making less of an impact on pop culture. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-13-14 09:45am - 3906 days | #9 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I also think it was part of growing up in the pre-internet era that someone would find that legendary first Playboy, Penthouse, or Hustler, and show it off to all of their friends. Nowadays, looking at porn online isn't a shared experience, everyone usually does it alone. People are less apt to talk about their favorite sites, so there is less of an impact on pop culture. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-11-14 05:36pm - 3908 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Women definitely do have their own tastes in porn. My wife just told me today she's getting into Hentai because of the story lines. I am intrigued. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-11-14 05:20pm - 3908 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Damn, my credit card was already compromised. Fortunately, the bank caught it right away, and it seems for now that any harm has been averted. They did ask me about that "ALS Scan" transaction showing up on my statement, and I was like, "Yeah, that's OK." They probably had no idea what it was anyway. Once my new card comes, I'm definitely taking a break for a few days until things get patched. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-10-14 06:04pm - 3909 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I was just thinking how the biggest names in porn today, such as Met Art and DDF, still don't seem to get the same name recognition among average guys as companies like Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler. I imagine that if most of my friends were polled, they would sooner think that Met Art is a museum in New York and DDF a pesticide like DDT, rather than realize that they are giants in today's world of porn. Why so little name recognition in pop culture? Also, I bet if you polled the same group, they would know porntube.com and xhamster.com right away. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-06-14 02:51pm - 3913 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Yup, no updates for a while. It's finally gone now though. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-05-14 02:40pm - 3914 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
These were the two sites owned by Raul Cristian's Cruel Media Productions, and it looks like they closed their entire operation and took their sites down in January. Glad I checked out Clara-G.com while it was still around, but it's too bad that this portion of her iconic work will no longer be available. Looks like it's time to de-list the two sites. Those who missed out on Clara-G.com can find a very similar site at FistFlush.com. Clara G and friends with lots of fisting, squirting, and peeing was the theme of both sites. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-02-14 07:55pm - 3916 days | #15 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
They must have known, it's on IMDB and her wiki page. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 04-02-14 06:35pm - 3917 days | #13 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Saeeda Vorajee aka Sahara Knite worked in porn and even did two scenes for wettingherpanties.com before moving on to acting to play the role of Armeca in HBO's Game of Thrones. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-31-14 04:29pm - 3919 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
SuzeClassics.com is good for having some of their earlier work, but they don't have all of it. It looks like they were updating by adding more old sets to their offerings up until 6 months ago, but then they stopped. I personally have a number of their old lost sets that were posted a long time ago on Suze.net and never offered on SuzeClassics.com. I emailed their webmaster to ask if they had any plans to resume updates, or if I could request particular shoots that hadn't been added yet, but I had no response. Too bad to think this great treasure trove of classic shoots is out there somewhere, yet it looks like it won't be posted again in its entirety. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-31-14 04:03pm - 3919 days | #2 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I don't know of a free converter that works in bulk, but I have not looked either. My advice is to keep the original WMV's too. You may already know this, but unless file conversion is done with the utmost care, it results in loss of quality from re-sampling the original file. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-23-14 07:11pm - 3927 days | #7 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
My understanding is that it has been leaked. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-23-14 05:37pm - 3927 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
OK, so I just checked back in at CrazyBabe.com, and they just put some fucked up clown shit on their landing page. If you can get beyond the weirdness, there are lots of good solo shoots inside. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-23-14 05:27pm - 3927 days | #5 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
So I definitely prefer the natural look because it's hard or often impossible to improve on it with surgery or procedures. If there are models who I'm really into, I consider it a travesty if they give up their natural breasts for implants or scrawl ink all over their bodies. So how is it that I still like Bonnie? The only thing that I like more than natural women is variety. I do want to see some totally tatted up ladies every now and then, and Bonnie does that well. If you are on the fence about enjoying tattooed women in the right context, check out CrazyBabe.com. Lots of their models are tatted up plus piercings with a very alt look. The settings are deliberately grungy, but they are photographed extremely well by Bob Coulter, producing very contrasty images full of highlights and shadows and popping with color. Total eye candy. Anyway, if you just look at the samples from that site, hopefully you might agree that tattoos can be good in the right context. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 03-23-14 01:40pm - 3927 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Holy shit, you guys are going to think this is crazy, but I just saw one of my ex-girlfriends from high school in porn. She has a very distinctive and beautiful face, and the video was shot where she lives, so I have no doubt in my mind this was her. She's not a recognizable porn model, and I doubt many of you would have seen the video, but it's a relatively run of the mill solo peeing clip to be honest. I can't say the site though, because I would hate to blow her cover. I'm not a jerk like T Bag from Duke. Anyway, this was really cool and totally unexpected. She peed for me a few times in high school, now she's taken to doing it for the camera. Unbelievable! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 301-350 of 403 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Page 7 | 8 | 9 | Next Page > |
|
