|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
LPee23 (0)
|
| 351-400 of 403 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Page 8 | 9 | Next Page > |
| 03-22-14 06:32pm - 3928 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User  Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
So I just read that Bonnie Rotten is going to be the next Elegant Angels 'Squirtwoman', following Jada Fire and Cytherea. What do you guys think of the choice? I know there are going to be a variety of reactions here, but I think it's awesome that they chose Bonnie Rotten. While the natural look is my favorite, I also love a woman with tattoos. I have actually thought for a while that it would be great if Bonnie did some peeing or squirting stuff, and now it is finally happening. Cytherea was a tough act to top, so we'll see how Bonnie does, but I think she'll bring something new and exciting to the role. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-13-14 05:00pm - 3965 days | #24 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I couldn't agree with you more. When I took an inventory of my collection and checked what was still around as of last year, I found that almost 300 sites that once featured peeing content have either removed some or all of it or closed. Almost 350 remain that either still have everything or I haven't had a chance to check them out yet. It's pretty cool that you're into this stuff too. It would be great to compare notes with you. You don't have private messages enabled on your PU account, but feel free to PM/email me if you like. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-12-14 05:06pm - 3966 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I remember the first video I ever saw of a woman peeing. Her stream was a tetris-like shower of very large white pixels. It was actually funny, and I wish I still had it! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-12-14 03:45pm - 3966 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Perhaps it is wise Pat, and I can only agree with you that you are right in wanting responsibility from the industry, especially when you think of family members. My concern is that these regulations are not being created in good faith. There are certainly many elected officials in the UK and other countries who would like to ban porn outright, but they have to settle for these little victories instead. Was the permanent closure of two sites necessary? Couldn't they just have taken them offline for a day to send a message? These bureaucrats and politicians cite good reasons for introducing online safety controls, true. Unfortunately, many see no legitimacy in the industry whatsoever, and it is reflected in the heavy handed way in which they enforce their policies. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-11-14 05:23pm - 3967 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
These were the early days of dial-up, and I still lived at home. I remember when we just got Windows 3.0 for the first time, and it was a totally different world from MS-DOS. I quickly found internet porn, and shared with my buddies. I'm going to share a totally embarrassing story here - especially embarrassing given the contrast between my tech novice at the time versus my understanding now as an engineer. I was going through a bunch of photos that I found for free - right click, save, right click, save... I must have missed "save" once when clicking in the menu, and the results caught up with me later. The next time I powered on the system, I was greeted with a 5 second showing of a full screen shot of a hot chick spreading her pussy for all to see! I thought, holy fuck, what just happened? It kept showing for 5 seconds every time I restarted the computer! Now what had really happened was that I had saved the picture as the background - so it showed for 5 seconds during start up before the wallpaper (which was different from the background in Windows 3.0) covered it over. So I couldn't figure out for the life of me what the hell happened. Here's the best part. I played dumb, and when my sister found it and told my parents, I suggested that it might be a virus. And they bought it!! I was totally off the hook! Plus our PC was showing this spread pussy shot on start up for 4 months straight before I could figure out how to take it down! Those were the days. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Feb 11, 2014, 05:28pm | |
|
||
| 02-11-14 05:07pm - 3967 days | #22 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I agree with this too. When I say I might delete content outside of my folder for closed sites, I am referring to stuff that is totally off topic for me. I am generally looking for stuff within my favorite niche - peeing. If I find that I have stuff even outside my niche from a site that has closed, I tend to keep it too. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-10-14 02:56pm - 3968 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
It's not a law, but a new administrative policy of Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) which regulates video on demand in the UK. Apparently they have broadened the definition of video on demand to include all online porn video. It's just another front in the UK war on porn. I can't believe that this hasn't gotten more publicity and stirred up more outrage, so I'm happy to elaborate on what's going on here. ATVOD has adopted the policy that all providers of online porn video must ensure that all content including samples is behind a strict paywall. Because you can purchase debit cards under 18 years old in the UK, they require that UK sites not accept debit cards. Unfortunately, it ruins the business model of providing free samples to encourage conversions. They are also pressuring sites outside of the UK to disallow users at UK IP addresses from using debit cards. What influence can they exert on a site with no UK ties? They are discussing requesting the ISP's to block non-compliant sites with no ability opt out from the filter. They had two sites taken down already by legally petitioning the hosting companies - jessicapressley.com and pleasuringherself.com. To quote their Chief Executive Pete Johnson, "The action taken in relation to the provider of the Jessica Pressley service is the first of its kind and demonstrates that the ATVOD rules that apply to UK video-on-demand services are backed by effective enforcement procedures." They also forced playboy.tv to relocate all servers outside the UK to avoid a takedown. I am baffled by the lack of public debate on this. I have been aware of this for months. See this article from ynot.com: http://www.ynoteurope.com/regulatory-fir...re-uk-adult-website/ Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Feb 10, 2014, 03:30pm (LPee23: Re-read original post and better addressed some specific points.) | |
|
||
| 02-09-14 04:31pm - 3969 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Has anyone come across a porn model or actress in an unexpected setting? I'm sure some have seen them at industry conventions, but that's not what I'm getting at. Has anyone ever seen one walking down the street (maybe if you live in the valley?) Or in an unexpected non-porn related role in a TV show or video? This just happened to me for the first time today. Yesterday I had an episode of COPS "Bad Girls" on - where they only feature clips of women having their run ins with the law. I saw a couple of women in their early 30's get arrested for driving in a stolen vehicle. They were both kind of cute, and the driver had distinctive makeup. Then just now, I was looking for something in my collection, and what do you know, there she was... I am not kidding. I have a picture of the exact same woman, with the same unique makeup too, peeing in the woods. She's an amateur not a porn star, but still... What are the odds? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-09-14 04:08pm - 3969 days | #17 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
My two cents here are this - make sure the site is still around before you delete it. If you've been collecting for over 10 years, you'll be surprised how many are gone. In doing my own inventory of my collection, I found that of all the sites I have ever downloaded from, 40% have closed. Almost all of the big, high profile sites that are widely known are still there, but so many smaller, low budget sites have come and gone. I personally would have a hard time deleting anything from a site that has closed - actually there is a special kind of satisfaction in having something so exclusive. Anyway, that's just my advice. If you would still delete the stuff even after knowing the site is closed, then you can truly do without it, but my recommendation is to check first. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-09-14 07:11am - 3969 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I organize first by site and then by model name. I also have a special folder for content from sites that have closed. I went through my entire collection early last year and identified a surprising number of them. I keep that stuff separate because it's irreplaceable, and keeping it separate ensures that I will not delete it. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-06-14 05:16pm - 3972 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Here's the low down on duplication on the ATK sites - I was a member of all of their sites just 4 months ago. Their ATKPetites site is the only one with duplication. About 1/4 of the content on that site is unique, but the rest is petite content pulled from their other sites. They don't make this a secret - the sets are labeled according to where they originated. Their other sites have content of a similar style of photography - which I like very much - but no duplications there. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 02-05-14 06:34pm - 3972 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Been a member a few times myself too at ATK Galleria and their other sites. Amkingdom.com seems to have once been one of their membership sites pre-2005, at least many of their older pics just have the watermark "amkingdom.com". Now amkingdom.com seems to be the main URL for the network, where you can find info about all of their sites, although of course memberships to the different sites are purchased individually. Almost all of the old amkingdom.com pics have gone to either atkgalleria.com or atkarchives.com. There were a handful that were licensed, most notably from Denys Defrancesco as well as Mountain Glamour, and these are the rare ones that aren't available anymore. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Feb 05, 2014, 06:43pm | |
|
||
| 02-04-14 03:09pm - 3974 days | #16 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Issues like this are why I think most of this proprietary backup software is actually bad for archiving data. It's OK if you want to restore your primary drive after a hardware failure and you don't have the inclination to do manual backups regularly. But imagine putting that drive on the shelf, letting 10+ years go by, and then trying to read it. The actual backup files will often consist of some unintelligible, obscure, proprietary format from a company that is long gone. That's why backing up manually still has its advantages - hopefully we can still read JPEG's and mp4's in the future. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-31-14 03:03pm - 3978 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Right on cue, my #2 Seagate 4Tb drive is starting to fail. Seems to be a problem with the USB interface not the drive itself. I'll pop it out of it's case soon and see how it does in my dock, once I've finished updating my backup copy. Here's what I take away from this article - Seagate is cheaper but lower in quality. It is probably more economical to buy Seagate regardless, as long as you dutifully back up everything. If you don't back up, or if you have a primary drive under heavy use, consider investing in Western Digital. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-27-14 07:40pm - 3981 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I appreciated this article, so I thought I'd share it here: http://arstechnica.com/information-techn...all-disks-are-equal/ Here we have a rare, head-to-head comparison of consumer drives operated under server conditions. Apparently I got what I paid for with my three 4 TB and one 2 Tb Seagate drives. Actually, I suspected as much when they cut their warranty from 5 years to 1 year. Luckily I have everything backed up, and I did save a lot of money on the Seagates. In the future, I might switch to Western Digital for my primaries and just use Seagate for periodic backups. In contrast, Western Digital also cut their warranty to 1 year, but their quality seems not to have declined. They are pricier though. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-22-14 06:47pm - 3986 days | #34 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Then again, I what I presented was a worst-case scenario, so maybe it won't be that bad. What's a best-case scenario? Maybe the tube sites will go, but the best paysites will remain? Regardless of what happens, there is a lot of uncertainty, and I am curious to hear what everyone thinks. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-21-14 04:43pm - 3988 days | #33 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
You are right, it won't have a direct international impact. I trust very few statistics that I see online regarding porn consumption, but there seems to be a consensus that the US is the world's largest consumer of online porn. I hope that if it gets really bad in the US, sites can move overseas and survive. At the same time, those with razor thin margins may be faced with some tough choices if or when their largest geographic market - the US - disappears. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-21-14 03:21pm - 3988 days | #31 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
The overturning of Net Neutrality in the US is likely to be a bad development for online porn. It is also such a complex issue, that it is difficult to predict any of it's effects with certainty. It seems to me that it's effects can be grouped into two main categories: effects on free speech and effects on business models. First, the effect on free speech. American porn online has been able to thrive online because of the protection afforded by the First Amendment. That is a weaker protection than most think though. We almost lost it all in 2012, and would have if Romney were elected. Remember the 2012 Republican Party Platform? It stated that "current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced." They would have made examples by prosecuting some big providers, most of the rest would have taken the hint and closed shop or left the US, then prosecuted whoever was left. Now, with the loss of Net Neutrality, there are many ways to make an end run around the First Amendment. Now that the ISP's are legally recognized as having their own "First Amendment" rights as editors of the internet, they can block whatever they want. It seems ridiculous that they could be considered editors - just as ridiculous as giving a paper company editorial discretion over Hustler Magazine - but that was the outcome of the case. They may not choose to use this power right away, they may eventually use it to get more people in from of the TV paying $10 an hour for their heavily edited softcore video on demand. Equally important, they may no longer be able to justify continuing to provide online porn under the Net Neutrality principle. They are now open to civil lawsuits from social conservatives, feminists against porn, and the religious right just for providing content that may be objectionable to some. How much would the ISP's put up to defend online porn, when they would rather having you watch their video on demand anyway? Second, there is the effect on the business models of various porn sites. What these business models all have in common is that they benefit from cheap bandwidth. I'll go through the different types of business model, and consider the effect on each one below. 1. Tube sites. Abundant, cheap bandwidth is the lifeblood of tube sites. Their business model is like this. They put up tons of free videos, many averaging 100 Mb, and try to get as much traffic as possible. They make all of their revenue off of ad's mostly for adult dating sites, cam sites, and adult toy sites. Even if they only get one click per 1,000 views, they still make money because bandwidth is cheap. So what will happen when bandwidth becomes artificially scarce and expensive? This is the easiest outcome of losing Net Neutrality to predict - the era of tube sites will be over. So maybe paysites should celebrate? Not so fast, we'll get to that eventually. 2. Free file hosting sites. These are the sites, like Kim Dotcom's Megaupload.com, that provide the bandwidth and hosting for pirate forums. Likes tubes, their business models will be totally shot when the cost of bandwidth goes up, and they will disappear too. 3. BitTorrent. While Verizon states that they do not intend to block any legal content, you can rest assured that they will be going after BitTorrent soon. During Verizon vs FCC, their lawyers mentioned BitTorrent specifically as the type of illegal traffic that they would like to block. 4. Paysites. Every single paysite will initially suffer without Net Neutrality. What the impact will ultimately be on specific types of paysites is extremely hard to predict. Maybe the large networks will fare best, and just pare down their offerings a bit to trim their costs. On the other hand, maybe some of the largest network owners will decide to get out at the top, and just close up shop. You know those old, small sites that haven't updated since the dial-up days? Maybe they will be the first to go when they see the higher bill. Then again, those old sites were built in days when bandwidth was scarce, and they get very little traffic as it is now, so maybe they are adapted for tougher times more than the big bandwidth hogs? Maybe paysites will see some benefit from the tube sites going away, but I think people will take up to a year to change their habits, and the big bills will start coming right away. Whichever sites remain at the end, I think we will see a shake up of the industry, and many site closings. 5. Brick and mortar porn shops. These guys are the only ones that I know besides the ISP's that are gleeful about the loss of Net Neutrality. It's money in the bank for them when online porn takes a hit. So these are all hypothetical scenarios, and hopefully it is not as bad as I have envisioned here. In reality, the ISP's won't be making any changes right away. With Net Neutrality hitting the front page of the Wall Street Journal and other major news outlets, hopefully the public debate will start to pick up the way it did for PIPA and SOPA. I know that I personally could never see myself voting for a candidate that opposes Net Neutrality, and I think many people feel the same way, so I hope this becomes an issue of debate in the next round of elections. Finally, the last shred of hope is that Comcast is bound by the ruling of a previous case in court to respect the Net Neutrality principle up through 2017. I hope this sparked some outrage. The impact of losing Net Neutrality is actually damaging far beyond the world of porn, but this is all I have time to discuss for now. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Jan 21, 2014, 03:25pm | |
|
||
| 01-17-14 06:12pm - 3992 days | #10 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
This problem may be caused by a corrupt file system and/or a failing hard drive. Your files may be recoverable, but please try to minimize using the drive that contains them, since any activity can overwrite them until they are recovered. First, I would not wait to back up everything that remains. I understand you have a Dell, what model is it? Also, is this problem confined to one drive? Is it an external or your primary drive? Let's say for example that the F: drive is affected. Please go through the following steps: 1. Open the start menu 2. Type "cmd" in the search box 3. Right click on the cmd icon and select "Run as administrator" 4. Type "chkdsk F:" and post any error messages here. Substitute the "F" for whatever drive is affected. Let me know, and we'll go from there. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-13-14 06:42pm - 3995 days | #25 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Very well said. Quality over quantity is key. There are many out there who do surf porn looking for high quantity free material, but that is actually beside the point. Users in that crowd will still visit the highest quality free sites they know of first. When they are done there, they will always go on to whatever other free sites await, but wouldn't it be great if myporn.com were the first place they looked for that clip or photoset or two of amazing new material? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-12-14 05:42pm - 3997 days | #26 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I'm going to take this thread off in a different direction, but still related to the economics of the porn industry. It's true that $30 a month seems to be the standard when it comes to subscriptions, but what is the value of digital porn when it becomes scarce? I can say a lot about this first hand, because I have been going to pretty significant lengths to recover some of the great porn that came before my time. By chance, I happened to get in touch recently with the producer of a really great site that went offline in 2006. This was a site that I was really kicking myself for not getting while it was still around. The content was not being offered for sale, so I knew I would have to make a significant bid. What was the price we agreed on? $1,500.00. For that price, he went to a storage unit and dug out the old computer, only to find that it didn't boot. So he mounted the hard drive in a new computer, and luckily all of the content was still there. This was honestly a price that we were both very happy with. Yeah, it's a lot more than $30 a month, but I would definitely never have seen this great content otherwise. So, this is how scarcity leads to a much higher price. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-12-14 01:27pm - 3997 days | #17 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
As you said Rick, the problem with tube sites is too much quantity and not enough quality. Many casual surfers for porn never get beyond the tubes to realize that there is much better stuff out there. I think you are right in that the solution is higher quality content in a limited quantity. I think a good analogy is like a tasting at a wine retailer. They bring out the high end stuff, but of course they don't let the customer drink their fill for the night. In keeping with this analogy, tube sites are like college keggers. You can drink your fill for next to nothing, but it's all crappy lite beer. We need to help porn consumers grow up and refine their tastes. I am definitely excited by what myporn.com will have to offer. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 01-01-14 02:06pm - 4008 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
It looks like EbinaModels.com is closed, or hopefully just down temporarily. If you try to visit their site, you will see a notice from GoDaddy: NOTICE: This domain name expired on 12/30/2013 and is pending renewal or deletion. Renew It Now! It just recently expired, so hopefully this was an oversight on their part, and they will renew it soon. I would really like to see them back. Is anyone else really frustrated by these notices? It really kills me to think that all that great porn is still up on a server, but you can't get at it, and it will all be deleted in a month. Was anyone lucky enough to have a membership at Ebina Models? How did you like their site? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-12-13 07:38pm - 4027 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I am very interested to research this, and I will definitely post again when I find out more. You may be right Khan, but then again, while consumers can claim ownership of the physical media of a DVD, they have no more ownership of the content on the DVD than if they just downloaded the content online. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-12-13 06:41pm - 4027 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
There was a ruling by the US Supreme Court in March of this year that we should all know about. They ruled that it is not a copyright violation to re-sell copyrighted works as long as 1) the original copy was obtained lawfully and 2) the seller does not keep a copy. This was termed the "First Sale Doctrine." Here is a link to an article describing the ruling: http://smallbiztrends.com/2013/03/resale...-you-bought-own.html Of course, this will not change anything in the world of file sharing and piracy because no one will really delete their original copies. Here's a situation where the new ruling will come into play. Let's say I was a collector of vintage porn, and I had found someone looking to get rid of their old collection. Under the previous copyright law, it would technically be illegal to exchange that collection. It would only be legal for the owner to keep it or dispose of it. Now it is no longer proposing a copyright violation to ask for the trade, donation, or sale of old collections that the owners want to get rid of! This is a great day for collectors of vintage porn, since it opens up new channels for trading! If more people end up trading as a result of this, then the new ruling will help keep the vintage porn that many of us love alive! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-11-13 08:55pm - 4028 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Likewise, please feel free to contact me. I would like nothing more than to contribute to the understanding and acceptance of pee fetishism. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-07-13 08:43pm - 4032 days | #5 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Nelson fought the good fight. His memory will last forever. Apartheid never again! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 11-19-13 01:59pm - 4051 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I was hoping to get some advice from the more experienced webmasters here. So, I am in touch with a producer who has a site up for sale. I cannot say the site, but it had an Alexa ranking of about 600,000 globally. I don't know their conversion ratio, but probably average. Apparently there are several companies interested in this site too. How would you value a site of this size (content and domain name)? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 11-10-13 04:29pm - 4060 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
The only recognizable pussy I've looked "straight in the eye" is my wife's! Of course I can easily recognize hers too! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 11-08-13 01:58pm - 4062 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
It occurred to me the other day that I can recognize a handful of porn stars just by their pussy. Have any of you come to the same realization? Here are the ones that I can recognize. Some are models that focused on peeing porn, so you may or may not recognize them. Idoia from magic-erotica.com Her pussy is incredibly sexy, and I think she knows it. I don't know another model that rivals her large, mocha-colored pussy lips. Amber Michaels She's a really hot redhead model, with a scorpion tattoo near her pussy. If you see the tattoo, you know it's her. These last two are a bit more obscure, but well known in peeing porn. Verena I don't know her last name, but she is an incredibly hot Romanian model. She was very prolific producing sets for many early peeing sites including pee4fun.com (closed), exxxhaust.com, peemotel.com, cafepee.com (closed), wetscape.com, and warmpee.com. Larger versions of her pics are still among my favorites on active sites like pissbank.com. She is one of those girls with just a perfect body and an exotic look. Her pussy is also very distinctive, with slightly darker lips. Maybe I have just seen it so much, but I can easily recognize her pussy without seeing her face! Susy from susysdesperation.com (closed) I would love to hear it if any of you actually remember this site. Susy was a hot MILF who made some very erotic peeing pictures in the late 1990's and early 2000's. Her site was way ahead of the times. While her competitors had pics in 350x550 (remember those days?), her pics were in the neighborhood of 700x800, sharp, and well composed. I can recognize her pussy from the way her pussy lips hang, and from a small mole on her middle left thigh. I would be really curious to know who you all can recognize just by their pussy! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 11-06-13 04:09pm - 4064 days | #6 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I was thinking of joining MyDirtyHobby.com soon. When I do, I'll let you know how it goes with SQ-Pay. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 10-23-13 04:50pm - 4078 days | #5 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Pew Research is conservative leaning, and they produce lots of bad statistics. Other groups have studies this topic, and the number generally comes out to be 33%. Also, one third of porn viewers online are women. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 09-19-13 07:06pm - 4112 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
29.99 is common in affiliate marketing inside and outside the porn world. 20 is a good deal, but the best players will charge more. If you can't do the marketing in house, you will have to pay a decent price. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Sep 19, 2013, 07:11pm | |
|
||
| 09-15-13 07:28pm - 4115 days | #3 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Lately I have become more interested in the esoteric, older content. I have already been to many of the large sites in the peeing niche, and for the new ones I haven't seen yet, they are doing well and I think they will be around for a while. I want to make it to some more of the earlier sites while they are still around. When I do come across good stuff at the old sites, it often makes for a very unique and rare addition to my collection. Sometimes, I actually look for some of the warning signs that you mentioned, because in many cases they have led me to sites that are still good, but may not be around in a few years. There is no sure fire way to predict when a site will close, but if one is doing very poorly with traffic, you can bet it is near the end. Poor web design, leased content hosted on another domain, and no updates are three other signs. It's actually been a lot of fun going to these old sites, kind of like visiting garage sales. You never know what you will find! Along the way I have made contacts and friends with some webmasters and producers, and even had a couple of sites that were closed for customers opened back up just for me. My feedback resulted in a couple more being opened back up for customers in general. I cannot say which sites or share the content, so please don't ask. The downside of this is that I run the risk of getting screwed over. It's definitely been worth it though. If any of you are a bit bored, you should give it a try! In the case of doctortrickles.com, I remember their pics well from the TGP's years ago. They had some non-exclusive pics, but they also had some really nice exclusive peeing pics of Amber Michaels that you can't find anywhere else. That's the main reason why I wanted to go to that site in particular. Amber Michaels also has some peeing pics on xxxhorror.com and galacticbabes.com, so I may check those out soon. Anyway, I made my original post hoping someone here may have some inside info on unrealbank.com. They actually encompass a very large network of sites that all seem to be down. I guess I'll just have to wait and see. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 09-15-13 04:24pm - 4116 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
UnrealBank hosts a number of sites catering to all fetish niches including RatherExtreme.com and DoctorTrickles.com. I just signed up for a membership, and logged in to find a bare-bones members area with a message that their site is undergoing remomdeling. There were a bunch of links to sets and movies that didn't work. Now maybe they are remodeling their website, but it seems more likely that they are down for good. I have been behind the scenes in e-business before, and I know that it is easy to remodel sites seamlessly without taking them down first and then building everything back up. Of course, the webmaster is not answering my emails to explain, but they rarely do that at fully (dys)functional sites anyway. Does anyone know the real story here? Any cause to be hopeful, or should I just get my money back? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 09-10-13 07:04pm - 4121 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
You are totally right, now I recognize Joanne too, although I had overlooked that before. I'm not sure if it's niche specific, but the early pics from ALSScan and especially from Wetscape were used en masse by dozens of other peeing sites in the early days of the genre. I'm not sure if they were licensed non-exclusively or used indiscriminately. It's very common to find early generation peeing sites with 50% unique content and 50% from Wetscape. I don't automatically disregard a site for this, although it is deceptive, because sometimes the exclusive portion of their content is worth it anyway. In the case of warmpee, all of the content in their tour looks like non-exclusive crap, but I have some very nice watermarked pics from them that I've come across over the years that I haven't seen anywhere else... Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Sep 10, 2013, 07:08pm | |
|
||
| 09-09-13 06:00pm - 4122 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Every now and then I go looking for the old, obscure sites, sometimes there are some hidden gems. So, let me tell you about this site I just (briefly) joined, and I'd like to hear how sketchy you think it is - 98%, 99%, or 100% sketchy. So, to satisfy my pee fetish, I joined warmpee.com. I had a few pics from them that were over 10 years old in my collection, and I wanted to see what else they had. Warning Sign No 1: Never heard of their biller, cybilling.com. Warning Sign No 2: Their log-in link redirects to a different domain (memberarea.tv). Big Warning Sign No 3: Thanks to my careful use of security settings and various security add-ons, I was warned that the site was attempting to install an unsigned java applet upon logging in. This screams attack website. Needless to say, I did not install it, and I immediately cancelled my membership. Have any of you encountered similar things at other sites? I hate to think I just missed out on the stuff I was looking for, but with a different domain and a sketchy java applet with no good purpose, I didn't feel I had much of a choice. Why would a porn website ever need to require its members to install a java applet? It doesn't make sense. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-24-13 10:02pm - 4137 days | #24 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
The content and niche is most important, but after that it's the price. Honestly, there isn't that much variation in price relative to amount and quality of content i.e. usually the sites that charge an extra $10-20 per month provide better content to justify it. That being said, I have come across sites that charge almost 10 euros per ~100 pic photoset, and you can be sure I will not be paying that anytime soon! Payment processor doesn't matter to me so far, but many others have been burned by bad processors, so I know I'm in the minority there. Packages can make a difference if they're really good. When I find a site that offers a site or two that I like as a bonus, you can bet that I'm joining that site next. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-23-13 09:02pm - 4138 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
So I know my favorite niche inside and out, but I need a recommendation outside the realm of peeing porn. Here's the story. So my girl and I both look at a good amount of porn. I'm into peeing stuff and she's cool with that, and we enjoy doing it together. When she looks at porn on her own though, she usually just goes to tube sites. She likes both guy on girl and girl on girl action. It's really important to her that it should be authentic and spontaneous, not too scripted or made-up. Her latest thing is vintage porn because she thinks she can find more authentic stuff in that niche. Anyway, she spends a good amount of time looking at this stuff, but she's always going to tube sites with low-resolution videos that I wouldn't even watch. I want to show her the world of HD video - so here's my question. What would your recommendations be for a membership that I could buy her as a gift? Or an exceptional DVD? Any ideas? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-21-13 07:55pm - 4140 days | #39 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Isn't this a contradiction? Also, give a government a powerful tool like ISP filtering, and its only a matter of time before "mission creep" sets in, and they use it for purposes other than it's initial intent. Case in point, consider the US. We now have agencies like DHS, whose creation was made palatable by strict assurances that they will stick to their mission of keeping Americans safe, that now spend taxpayer dollars taking down websites with unauthorized broadcasts of sports games. Once ISP filtering is implemented, it's only a matter of time before it is expanded. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-17-13 04:49pm - 4145 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Why are do you think some webmasters (I'm sure not the ones here) are so difficult to reach? Don't they know it is bad for business? I recently joined one site, european-femdom.com, and here was my experience. I initially tried to join several months ago. On the page to join you are supposed to select your language and then click the "Go" button. This didn't do anything, so I emailed the webmaster. Of course, no reply, so I assumed the site was dead. I have a thing now for British sites, I'm trying to get what I can while I can, before censorship gets too crazy over there. It has become a bit of an obsession, so I returned to the site to see if I was missing anything. It turns out, there is a link that says "Credit Card" in exactly the same font and format as regular text, which you have to click on to join. You would never think this is a link unless you hopelessly tried clicking on it. So I joined, and found that most of their content was still up, almost 300 videos. There were about 10 links to videos that did not work. And if you click on a link to view a video, you are greeted with an error. You can only download them. So in this case, I get the story, this is probably a site where the owner is done putting in any effort and just wants to collect revenue. But come on! Their traffic is tanking, probably because most people think they are actually dead! I just joined another very esoteric UK site - ukdiapergirls.com. Yes, I'm into the peeing fetish, and I like to see adult girls pee in diapers. Even for their members, they do not even provide any contact information for the webmaster or business in general. They just say to contact the payment processor for membership issues. Why would a site be so aloof to their members? I can understand getting lazy and not checking your email, but not even creating a way for your members to contact you? In no other area of e-business would this fly. What do you guys think? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-17-13 04:37pm - 4145 days | #4 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
It looks like this would display nicely on a smartphone or tablet, perhaps maybe it was designed with this in mind? Do many of our users visit the site via smartphone or tablet? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-15-13 08:20pm - 4146 days | #19 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I prefer pictures too by far. I know I'm going against the grain here, because HD video is so hot nowadays, but I've always liked pics more. Let's say I'm watching a nice video. I'll be watching, waiting for just that moment that I want to see, anticipation building up, and then that moment is there and wait... I wish I had a picture. As great as the resolution of videos has become, it comes nowhere close to pictures in capturing the detail of the scene. The dialogue in videos can be great, especially when it is either honest or mind-blowingly filthy, but videos that do that really well are rare. How many of you have joined sites only to find that they got models to come so they could shoot some video that is barely HD, and they didn't even bother to take any pictures? They just post some crappy screenshots? That, to me, is ridiculous. Added bonuses of pics - they are small files, easy to organize, and you never run out of room for them. I know I am in the minority here relative to the average porn user, but I am for pics all the way. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-15-13 06:51pm - 4147 days | #8 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I tried this once years ago, because I was running out of hard disk space. I would strongly advise anyone against doing this. I now view the few hundred clips that I cropped as basically useless, and I have gotten most of the originals back. Here's the biggest problem with cropping - you are destroying the quality of the part that you save too!!! Unless you have the original uncompressed video file, and you probably do not, you cannot crop without degrading the quality of the video! That is because cropping cannot be done on a compressed file like an .mpeg directly. Software that does cropping works by converting the compressed file back into an uncompressed file, making changes, and then re-applying compression. Because compression is applied across frames, the part that you save will be compressed differently, even if you use the exact same type of compression. It is like compressing the video a second time - more data is lost, and the picture quality becomes less clear. I also agree with you guys that the soft stuff is often the best. Sometimes all the action seems like noise when you just want to spend some time admiring a model's body. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 08-06-13 08:28pm - 4155 days | #12 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I just purchased my first 4 Tb drive, so now the cost of 1 Gb storage is $0.50. With storage this cheap, I'm much less likely to delete pictures. The limits of storage used to force me to save only my favorites, but that's changed now. Finally it's realistic to download all of the pics on many sites, and store them for a fraction of the cost of membership. If I can store the content indefinitely for less than the cost of 1 month membership, I think that's a good deal. I'm done deleting pictures from sites I like, I'll just keep it all. I haven't made up my mind on videos yet though. They are so much larger, I may have to keep only the best ones. I wish it weren't this way though. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 07-29-13 03:22pm - 4164 days | #5 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
You guys might be right - such a forum could be considered piracy, although the idea was to minimize the impact. I give you credit for actually paying for porn. Initially, like most everyone, I looked for all the free stuff out there. Then I realized that while a lot of the free stuff is great, especially the true amateur stuff, you get so much value for your money when you go to paysites. If you think about the work that goes into shooting all the pics and videos in a typical paysite, it's actually pretty impressive. How much time and money would it take any one of us to shoot that ourselves? And instead you can get it for $40, the price of dinner for two and a few beers? Probably the best value of our time. I'm with you guys for supporting paysites. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 07-28-13 04:44pm - 4165 days | #33 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Let's call it what it is - this is just the first step in a crusade against pornography by certain political groups in the UK. And there may be a second front in this offensive. I recently purchased a membership at a site that featured porn produced in the UK and subsequently sold to a business in the Netherlands. This was a site featuring BDSM and peeing that made the claim, which I will admit is absurd, that it was not porn. While I was a member, I saw them take down about two thirds of their sets, amounting to about 15,000 pics and 1 GB worth of porn. They took down probably 98% of their sets containing nudity, leaving only the ones with non-nude S&M. They still have a few dozen sets with nudity, but they are almost entirely non-nude now. So why did they do this? I quote: Please also note that recently we have had to remove some of our older content in order to comply with new biller/visa regulations. However, we will have some new content soon to replace it. Sets will be renumbered at that time. This is a disturbing trend. What do you think, will we see this happen with more UK sites? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 07-28-13 04:17pm - 4165 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
So I'm new here, and I've had a few ideas I've been playing with over the past several months, so I thought I'd post them and see what everyone thinks. Here's the first one - a forum dedicated to posting porn from sites that have closed. From reading the threads here, I already know that some of you have been through the painful scenario of losing some porn in your collection only to find that the site is now gone. I've been there too. I've also seen great looking sites disappear before I could get a membership. If any of you have tried to find porn from sites that have closed, you know that it is mostly an exercise in frustration. While sites are in business, they have 1,000s of customers, many who download and keep everything. So when a site closes, all those pics and videos are still out there, it's just almost impossible to get most or all of them. It doesn't have to be that way. There are plenty of forums out there for sharing porn, and some really excellent ones with loads of HD videos uploaded for sharing every day. Someone should create a forum dedicated to rare porn! This is totally possible, and actually such a do-able idea, I can't believe there isn't one out there. To those who doubt it's possible, let me refute that right now. My collection is the proof that it is possible. I am a niche porn user - I only focus on peeing porn. Despite being in this small niche, I have over 32 Gb and 52,000 unique files from sites that have closed. I have about 50x this amount from sites that are still open, and I still haven't purchased a membership at close to half the sites in my niche. Yeah, I re-visited all the sites I had ever downloaded from, and re-organized my collection based on what is still around and what's not. So 52,000 files is more porn than most paysites have, and definitely enough to form the nucleus for a forum. And I also know all the sites in my niche well enough to moderate a forum and say what is still around and what is not. I have the technical know-how to run a forum. It's because I have a "politically correct" job that I have to limit my role in the porn world. I've also been offered to mod at other forums and had to turn it down. Have any of you ever found a full site-rip from a site that closed and been lucky enough to download it? It's happened to me only twice, both times on DC++. I can tell you, that to get all those pics and videos that I thought I would never have was the best time I have ever had downloading porn. Scarcity makes art more valuable and porn more erotic. The added bonus for running a forum on rare porn - you are not hurting anyone's profits by sharing it and there is no one around to enforce copyright. So I'm giving away this idea, I have no plans to do it myself. I suspect that if any of you decide to start a forum for rare porn, it will be a raging success. Just remember to invite me! Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 07-28-13 03:36pm - 4165 days | #11 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
I looked over the clips on that site once and bought a few. It is insanely expensive, so you have to pick carefully. There are definitely some gems though. I got one of my favorite clips there in HD for $5, it was actually a very obscure clip, and I haven't seen it anywhere else. The prices are way too high, but for this clip it was worth it. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 07-15-13 03:33pm - 4178 days | #9 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Look like you're right about kink.com, they don't seem to be updating. ALS has plenty of girl on girl pissing scenes though. As for Canada, we've got pisswhoretraining.com, which has plenty of man on woman watersports. Most of this stuff does come from Europe though, definitely seems to be easier to produce overseas. Looking at the poll, the numbers are even higher than I would have guessed. 8 in 100 love it, and 16 in 100 look at it occasionally. Yeah, we're probably more open minded than the general population in here, but that's still pretty high. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 351-400 of 403 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Page 8 | 9 | Next Page > |
|
