|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
badandy400 (0)
|
| 851-869 of 869 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 17 | Page 18 |
| 04-22-08 07:59pm - 6087 days | #25 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User  Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Very true. I am certainly glad that is not the case now. After all $670 for 1 TB would really slow me down! I find myself doing that for many things. It is one of those ways of putting a date on yourself. Kinda like calling a CD a record, or saying "I am taping that show." Most 500 GB drives can be had for about $100....so 20 cents per GB. The smaller ones end up costing more per GB. Any more I prefer to perhaps pay a cent or two more per GB and get a high drive density. Many people forget that it costs money to house and connect anything over what your computer could originally handle. I found some dirt cheap Sata to Sata enclosures and SATA controller cards, but it still cost about $15 per drive to get it running when buying these components in volume. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 12:15pm - 6088 days | #6 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Solution is simple....kick in the ass. Seriously though..these guys are right. If it is an other system the reinstall might take a little longer, but I have done several of these in a day. This is not a three week project so dont be afraid to do it, closer to three hours. Just make sure you have all the keys for your programs and OS. I also recommend backing up all your family pictures or important documents on a DVD or else wise just to be safe if you use the ghost or other cloning software. The issue with cloning is that you are cloning the issues you are having too. But..the clone could be useful if you reinstall everything fresh, then write the clone image somewhere.....this way next time you can just load the clone and start from there rather than redo everything. Could always update to a newer machine too, this would certainly solve a lot of issues. Well, for a while. Or course, if you are broke like me this is not such an option! :) "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 12:07pm - 6088 days | #23 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
To hell with that Toadsith!!! 67 cents per GB is an extreme anal raping! Seriously though...it is easy to find them at 25 cents per GB...most actual stores are around 33 cents still...and I have been paing 18 cents per GB on the last 4 drives i bought. Of course this depends on where you live, but if you order from an online store you should be able to get a 500 GB drive for $100 shipped. If you find the right deal you can get a 750 GB for 130 shipped. If you are looking for back up only I still say go with an external drive so it can stay off while you are using your computer for something else, or while you are away from it. Just a tid bit of info....Seagate bought out Maxtor anyway. Lacie drives are usually pretty expensive...you could buy a couple drives for the price of one of those! Which ever method you decide on just allow windows or whatever to do a full format of the new drive....be careful to select the right drive though! External drives are usually preformed, but reformat it anyway because the long format checks the drive and can tell you if there is anything wrong with it. Alot of times I use quick formating but that is because I am lazy and usually in a hurry...but then end up emptying it an running a full check anyway. Basically...get one of the big names, make sure it is new with a warranty. These things are not rocket science to set up for simple porn use. Hell the external drives you just plug the power cord into the wall and the USB into the computer and 10 seconds later you are saving you hard earned collection. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-21-08 04:07pm - 6088 days | #19 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
If you are truly worried about data lose just used a mirrored array. You can use hardware for this or just let Windows do it for you. The only problem here is that this only pretects you from physical hardware failure. If you get a virus or delete something accidentally it is mirrored to both drives. You could always get a second drive and simply copy and paste your videos and such to it every so often, then simply unplug it. Externals are nice for this since you can just hit the power switch and leave it off for a month at a time if you would like. Plus it is less prone to user error. Another option is to back everything up to DVD. This take a bit of time. But not as much time to download everything. This is cheaper than buying a hard drive by about 4 times, but it is messier and you are oinly going to write to the disk one time...so updating with new material is a pain in the ass. If you have a little money to spend on this just go for a second hard drive and have it connected through eSATA preferable, but USP or Firewire should do you just fine. Granted this costs more....but is a lot easier and keeps everything together. Also, Western Digitals are claimed to be more reliable, slightly. But to what extent I honestly do not know. Personally I have had 1 WD and 1 SG sent back. How many hard drives are you talking about having though? Or how much data are you looking to store. If it is in the range of several TB or higher you could also consider a raid 5 array. But that depends on how fancy you want to get. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-16-08 06:37pm - 6093 days | #15 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Williamj. Dont worry, you certainly are not the only one! DRM usage is a definite turn off. Hell it is worse than seeing your own grandmother naked. Seriously though, there are many people who are trying to avoid sited with DRM to convey the message that us the users do not want DRM and all the hassles that come with it. Khan, I hope I did not step over any lines. I certainly wont be delving into any DRM hacking details. The last thing I need is the FBI showing up and taking all my porn collection, I would cry! Another sad aspect of DRM is the current works of hardware DRM. Here stuff with DRM computers is said not to even be able to be shared with non DRM systems. This leads into a whole big set of issues. But it also carries much heavier criminal punishments for tampering. My understanding is that the punishment for tampering with the hardware is worse than that of actually cracking the DRM. So even attempting is bad. Kinda like getting 5 years in prison for shooting someone, but getting an extra 20 because you used an unregistered full0auto weapon. That is the actual federal sentence for automatics too. Kinda rough I would say! Moral of the store: dont use an automatic firearm to tamper with DRM, you might get the death penalty. :) "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-16-08 06:22pm - 6093 days | #15 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Western Digitals seem to be a little faster that Seagate, at least for me. But I would grab something with a good warranty and just back everything up to dvd every now and then. If you are just using it for storage of videos and such it really does not need to be a top performing drive. Just avoid the re manufactured drive off of ebay. Not saying they are junk, but the warranty is usually much shorter. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-15-08 10:18pm - 6094 days | #4 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
For HD I am not as concerned with resolution as I am useful bitrate. It is not hard to make a 320x240 video into 1080i, hell I can do that myself, and I can make it take more than a GB per minute, but it still looks like shit. It is all about the source. From a good source my capture card makes some stunning video even just using component inputs. But in general from what I have seen online 2 MBit videos look nice at 640x480 and great at 4 MBit. Once you get up to 8 and up they pretty much top off unless you intend to watch them on your big screen. Even then there is not much need for anything above 8 MBit. I as have mentioned on PU before, Toadsith as well, it really depend on the quality of compression and source equipment. A well done 4 MBit video should look absolutely amazing. And a 2 MBit video should be good enough to please most people in quality and be small enough to not need 12 TB of storage to keep everything forever. I am noticing some places are simply stepping up the bitrate with out doing any actual filtering just to the video seem like it would be better when in fact the file size just increased making it harder to store, download, and play. Worth noting though, even Blu-Ray is not lossless. Everything is compressed. My capture card is using component and set to pre-compress and record at 720p and it still take about 700 MB per minute. Doing anything higher runs above my hard drive's write speed of 80 MB/s. The only way to get lossless quality is to connect the camera directly to the computer with HDMI and have a very large and fast striped raid set...and a hell of a machine to go along with it! Again, the cost factor as Toadsith mentioned. Medium budget porn producers simply can not afford this sort of set up yet, and it really is not needed even. Good editing and filtration is all that is really needed to make good porn videos. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-14-08 05:28pm - 6095 days | #7 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Oh...I have another 750 GB WD drive on the way. Well most of the drives are in external enclosures with external power sources, but connect directly with SATA. So they spend most of the time off even though their host computer runs 24/7. The noise really is not bad, hell they are all in my bedroom. They do make the room warm at times though. All of those drives running with my older system is not as noisy as the case fans for my HD system even with the fans on low speed. The only problem with my setup is it is still a bit messy. I have cleaned it up a bit but it still needs a little work. I pride my self when people say "holy shit" when I tell them how much I have for storage. 13 TB tends to turn heads. Does anyone else have a good sized collection? I would love to hear how some of you guys are storing your precious downloads. Maybe I could get an idea from someone. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-10-08 07:15pm - 6099 days | #20 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Colm4. Check oout my review of girlkissing. com...it sould like it would be to your liking. It is only $15 a month and has some decent videos. I must agree with your niche choice. Girl on girl anything is so damn hot! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-09-08 08:57pm - 6100 days | #12 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
The HD disk and Blu-Ray disk use the same laser to read the disk. HD DVDs and Blu-Ray were capable of holding the same data densities. HD DVDs were much more user friendly and did not come with the extra anti copy stuff built in. Blu-Ray us also soon to be able to tag itself to a certain player. Meaning that once you pt a movie or game in a player the disk will not work in another player. Blu-Ray is not an issue to break at this point because the security features are not active yet. Since we are on the topic of DRM, Sony was sued over the metallic coating the used on the disks for abrasion resistance. As it turns out they STOLE that technology. Make you go "HUM?" a company is worried aboiut piracy yet they steal from other companies. Just like a few years back they were sued of using an anti-piracy code that was pirated from another company. Seem a little ironic? A company pirating anti-pirate software! Although I am a little glad Sony won...my PS# I waited several days for in freezing rain for is not useless. But, I guess software is not as bad as the forecasted future of DRM that is hardware based! JD, currently that is correct. When a DVD is released the producers have until the release date to protect the data on the disk. Hackers then have from the release date to eternity to hack the disk, and there are more skilled people on the hacking side. Now if the data is streamed and never stored by a user, the company sending the data can constantly counteract the efforts to be able retain the stream as a download. They are trying to tip the playing field to their advantage. My worry is not so much about movies and games as it is with stuff you would currently be able to download of the internet (PORN). There needs to be a way for a person to be able to download or buy something and make backups with ease....but not be able to give a copy to other people, or spread them all over the internet in files sharing networks. Why should I pay $30 for each site I join when the guy down the road got all the same stuff for free. At the same time, why should I not be able to backup my precious downloads to protect my investment from hardware failures. After all if one of my 500 GB drives fail what does that have to due with the site I downloaded from 3 months ago to fill that drive. Well it should not and I should not have to pay to recover the videos and such I already paid for. Of course, practically not possible to know what some one will do with backups anymore. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-09-08 10:48am - 6101 days | #6 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Splitting up is always a bad idea to me. I would rather a site just section it self internally rather than break everything up and make us pay more. If I do not like a particular style that a site does a little bit of I would rather it be there and me just skip over it than have it not there at all. I hate that I had to pay more to get the better stuff here anyway. I definitely will not pay three times! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-08-08 08:38pm - 6101 days | #8 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Damn do I feel young. I thought it was bad that the first video I had was a copy of a VHS tape I got from a friend! You guys are going back to when porn was a rare commodity!! To respond to your comment about children surfing porn sites, check my profile. You should notice I say I have seen surfing porn site for 10 years, okay but wait, I am 22! I think you can do the math. I would say I turned out okay, other than a major porn addiction. On the other hand, there is a great deal of porn that should not be so easy to view by kids. A titty picture (Playboy) I would say is fine, but the sites with stuff like pregnant midgets eating cum out of a transsexual's ass while being fucked by a horse! This sort of thing needs to be locked up a bit better from those who are too young to understand what they are seeing is not normal. Toadsith, that study came from Maxim magazine I believe. I read the article. Yes, I was Maxim, the March 2008 issue. It makes perfect sense that women are more secretive towards porn. Remember high school when everyone was envious of the guy who banged 2 girls, yet those girls were then considered whores? If dad finds his son's porn stash he jokes about it and then thinks nothing of it...imagine the same dad finding his daughter's porn stash. More than likely he would freak out. Most guys want to bang every girl they see, but they want virgins still. I also must say that I am tired of the girls screaming bloody murder during sex. I nice moan would be great, and more realistic. This is why I frequently watch porn on mute, I can see that the dude has a huge cock, I dont need to be told 300 times. Maybe if they came up with something other than "oh yeah, fuck yeah" and dont forget they say "oh Im cumming" every four seconds! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-08-08 08:14pm - 6101 days | #9 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
You are very correct. We are all at least somewhat familiar with the recent HD format war. Sony obviously pushed Blu-Ray while some others including MicroSoft pushed HD. MicroSoft pushed HD because they wanted the war to continue as long as they could. But notice they did not make the XBox with the HD drive internal? There is two reasons. One being that they actually wanted Blu-Ray to win if the war ended, because it is inherently more resistant to piracy. Although, HD-DVD was the superior format (yes, it was capable of the same sizes as Blu-Ray). The second reason hit home to what Toadsith said about downloads going by the way side. MicroSoft's main reason for trying to extend the war is because they actually wanted neither format to win...a stalemate. They are working on streaming...streaming everything. MicroSoft wants to get ride of physical media, and the ability to store the data on your drives. Basically if you want to watch a movie, you select it and it is streamed to you. VOD with no option to download. This way you can not copy anything all together. No more worries about people letting friends copy their DVD collections. Hopefully porn does not follow in this path. It does seem that porn is going the other direction, but hopefully it continues to do so. But, I still say get it while the gettin is good. You never know when things might change suddenly. Imagine stream only for everything! With the way things are going now it soon might be very difficult to even make DVD backups of the stuff you paid for and downloaded. Hell, look what HDCP will do to us with slightly older systems! Does not look good for the consumer! :( "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-07-08 04:32pm - 6102 days | #5 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
For a direct answer. VideoBox is download able. I have been a member for a while now. Also they do not use DRM. Check reviews for Videoz. I was a member there a year or two ago, at that point the did use DRM, sometimes. Now to confuse you. If they say downloadable they mean exactly that, you click download...you wait for it to transfer to your drive, then you watch. Stream is a watch as it loads method. If you have a good connection you can do this, but it is temporary. Some download managers can download most streams anyway. Downloads take up space on your HDD, streams generally do not, but they can site in your cache for a little while eventually to be deleted, this all depends on many things though. Try to stick with downloading, especially if you like to see a video more than once. Now the dreaded DRM. No, DRM is not spyware, it is simply security, you do not stay connected to the site forever. But you must connect to them to view the video. DRM is basically like renting a movie, but not having to return it. Like a temporary tattoo, they only last a short while and have to be renewed, otherwise they go away. Well, the movie does not go away, but you still can not open it. If you download a DRM movie you will have to allow the media player to acquire a license for the movie, you must be online to allow this to happen. It will do this automatically, but you have to log into the server with your username and password. Once you do you get to watch, until the next clip comes then you have to do this all over again! This puts a serious damper on the mood. The point of this is that they can make the license last forever, or 10 minutes, it is up the the owners. Mnay places make the license last for amonth (membership length) then you have to relicense the movie. This way if you canceled you no long can watch their movie. This also prevents people from sharing movies, and you from moving the movie onto a different computer. If you do you must re do the licensing. A few sites allow you to keep the movie forever once it is licensed, but if try to move it will not work anymore with out resigning up. The goal with DRM is to prevent me from sending you a movie with out you ever having to pay the owners for it. The negative affect is that it also prevents us from making personal back ups of the stuff we pay for. So it ends up bitting the honest, paying users in the ass. This is why so many people are sour about DRM. Also, worth mentioning. It IS illegal to tamper with DRM. Technically you are not allowed to use screen capture programs, or set back the bios time/date on your computer to be able to continue to watch the movie. Basically we ask to you to do yourself and everyone else a favor by not giving money to those who use DRM. It will do nothing but piss you off, and condone those who use this monstrosity. If people avoid it like the plague, perhaps webmasters will avoid using it as well. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-07-08 04:04pm - 6102 days | #4 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
I have three that are used. One is a laptop, nothing fancy. I upgraded the hard drive to a 120 GB Seagate and the ram to 1 gig. Only use it for downloading away from home. :) My hard drive set up if fairly dynamic, but I have two machines each used a little differently. Old one for downloading and storage, new one for HD video processing. My older machine, and most used, is about 4 years old now. Started off with: Gigabyte motherboard, AMD 3200+, 512 MB dual channel Corsair 3200, Raidon 9800 Pro, and a 160 GB HDD. Now it has 2 GB dual channel Corsair and and many HDD 20.1 Dell monitor back when they were $1000. New machine is AMD 6000+, Gigabyte Motherboard, Intensity Pro HD capture card, 250 GB SATA HDD, 8 GB Corsair 6400 ram, 8600 video, Antec 900 case. Think that is all. The video capture card makes wonderful HD videos, up to 1080i from any HD source. This eats up space quick so I have to trans code and compress for DVD fit. Recording 720p and precompressed still uses about 700 MB per minute! Dont as about uncompressed 1080, this requires a 4 disk RAID set and I am too lazy to set it up!! :) Now for the Hard Drives :) 4x 4 port SATA RAID controllers, plus 2 and 6 on board and the IDE ports too, up to 12 I believe 1x160 GB 1x250 GB 1x120 GB 1x300 GB 2x400 GB 6x320 GB 10x500 GB 3x750 GB 1x1000 GB For at total of 11,800 GB or 11.8 TB whichever you like better. Me love to brag about that, I also was the first kid on the block to break the 1 TB mark...but I am glad HDD prices are still dropping, although still an expensive hobby. I have a 3 MBit connection at home and can get on a 100 MBit unrestricted. But I am still mad at you bastards with 20 MBit at home!!! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-04-08 01:56pm - 6105 days | #10 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
I find that recurring can be good and bad. It is nice because if it is a site you like, you dont have to worry about price increases and remembering when to renew and getting the same username and password. It would be nice if sites would give you the option to have recurring or non recurring with out the extra charge. I have had a few sites now where I swear I canceled then I find out months later that I did not. With UltimateSurrender they do not bill with a name that lets you know who they are on your credit card. So I got billed for about a year with no clue who was doing it. Sites should be decent and let you know that you have a membership still active if you do not sign in for a month, but they dont because they are getting your money while you forgot or the cancel did not go through. So recurring is a curse and a blessing. A few times I have programmed a reminder in my phone to tell me to cancel a certain site by a certain day...this works pretty well. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-04-08 01:26pm - 6105 days | #3 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Amy Reid is fantastic. Real, firm and shapy! Jenna Jamison is nice. Legendary! Gianna...all over the web! Nice naturals. Princess from MC-Nudes....HUGE and so nice! Sorry, I know that is four....I just could not help it! I do not mind fake boobs too much, but natural is great. The shape is very important to me. I would rather boobs be a little smaller and have great shape than huge and look like watermelons. But, I love huge fake one too! :) Fake is nice because they are usually nice and firm and look great in clothing. Naturals look nice clothing at times, but so many women with large naturals are either big elsewhere or lack shape. If two sets of boobs are equal it is obvious to go with naturals though. They do feel better, and the have a much nicer movement to them. I love seeing a women with nice firm naturals walking along and see them jiggle in her shirt...or they way they slide slightly up and down as you bang her! The best size would be a 32-34 DD. But they must be firm and shapy, no knee hangers. The issue here is that bra sizes are not standardized at all. Victoria Secret for example seems to be generous on the sizes, a D to them might be a C to someone else. Plus many women call themselve a 32 DD when in fact they are more like a 34 small C. So a 32-34 DD measured correctly is ideal. Boy do I love tits!!! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview Edited on Apr 04, 2008, 01:30pm (badandy400: Needed to add to it!) | |
|
||
| 04-03-08 08:52pm - 6106 days | #6 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
The biggest thing for me is for the site to be easy to download from. It doesn't matter how nice the videos are or hot hot the women are if you have to spend all day queuing up downloads and not having time to enjoy them. A user should be able to queue up a full days worth of downloads in 10 minutes if in a hurry. Then when you get home from work or whatever there is plenty of videos and such waiting for you. I hate it when I join a site that maks me download in chunks and have to rename the videos because they were lazy and named them all "Video" or named them "1234" instead of "Alica bangs Ryan". People who do not use zips for the photos really piss me off! You know what, this all describes Bang Bros. so far! What others have mentioned is important too, of course. So there is no need to regurgitate everything that has already been said, thanks Toadsith, you saved me an hours worth of typing! :) And for fuck's sake! Stop with the download limits and DRM already! No Porn User likes this, so the sites owners are only scaring away customer! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 04-03-08 08:39pm - 6106 days | #7 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
Amy Reid would be hard to pass up...why oh why only one!!! "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 851-869 of 869 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 17 | Page 18 |
|
