Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3575)  |   Threads Started (31)

1101-1150 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 22 Page 23 24 31 38 45 52 59 71 72 Next Page >

05-05-13  06:15pm - 4248 days #1096
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I saw Iron Man 3 this afternoon and it was okay but more on this lower. First my opinion of the movie seems to be in the vast minority because it has already made over 175 millions in North America and over 500,ooo in the rest of the world it's a definite box office hit.

Now as to why I said the movie is just okay. There are going to be some major spoilers in what I'm writing so do not read further if you want to go into the movie fresh.

1-We are introduced to two semi-important characters in the first few minutes of the movie but frankly I don't know why since they aren't really important to the story.

2-We are told that Tony suffers from the after effects of his fight in the Avengers but except for one more or less major episode. The guy looks about the same as he always does and his way of getting better makes absolutely no sense.

3-The main bad guy turns out to be a puppet of the real bad guy and one that we are supposed to laugh at when he's revealed to be a simple drug addicted Shakespearean actor
who was blackmailed into playing the role of The Mandarin but is not aware of all the bad things being done in is name. It's bad enough that the only thing this Mandarin has in common with his comic book counterpart is the name but at least he should have been the actual bad guy.

4-Tony and Pepper are super human because they survive not one but two seperate missiles blowing up less than 20 feet from them all the while these same missiles are able to destroy Tony's California mansion.

5-There are soooo many different characters each with some dialogue that I felt like I needed a pad and paper to keep track of who they were and what role they were playing. It didn't help that they were on screen for less than a couple of minutes before dying or not be seen again.

6-There are so many new armors that I could have used my above note pad to keep track of them but like the human characters. They aren't on screen for long and they don't survive.

7-Last but not least. Can anyone who has seen the movie explain what the movie was about. Other than dialogue and explosions and pretty much allowing the possibility of a new Iron Man. I still don't know what it was about. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-05-13  01:40pm - 4249 days #612
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


kin8tengokuDOTcom
Porn site with European models, but with a Japanese flavor.
Very expensive.
$48/month.


I'd stay far away from this site if you've had a Teen Mega World membership in the last couple of years because you probably already have most of this sites content and you would feel really stupid if you paid twice what it would cost you if you joined TMW. The only stuff that you may not have is the one starring US porn performers and do you really want to pay almost 50$ for those scenes?

I'm not going to call these guys scammers because there is a possibility that Japanese can't access TMW in Japan but it's definitely a scam site for anyone who can and somehow gets fooled into thinking that it's European porn with a Japanese style to it. It's not. Long live the Brown Coats. Edited on May 05, 2013, 01:44pm

05-04-13  05:37pm - 4249 days #1095
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Did you get a sense that he isn't going to be doing the character for much longer? I read that he wants to do other things and that would mean no more RDJ as Iron man. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-28-13  09:52am - 4256 days #81
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^It's true that Fox has a lot of foxes(sorry for that one) but they are nut jobs and that is a major turn off for me. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-27-13  06:29pm - 4256 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
We are probably very lucky that he made this far because if there is one poster child for dangerous behavior in country music that George is perfect for it.

He will be miss and we at least still have his music to soothe the pain. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-21-13  11:44am - 4263 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
No clue on this one but why don't you look at clips4sale. This is basically the same thing and that one has a few reviews on PU and TBP so you know it's a trustworthy site. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-20-13  07:08am - 4264 days #49
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


graymane, hoping you are on your feet with a speedy recovery from your ailments.

Getting old can be a bitch.


That is quite true but whenever I think that then I stop and consider that not getting old must be so much worse. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-18-13  06:26pm - 4265 days #1089
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Every trailer I've seen so far seem to point to Tonto as having a bigger role than the Lone Ranger and frankly that makes absolutely no sense to me. I know that Johnny Depp is the bigger star out of him and Armie but he isn't the one I'm going to fork my money to see. Four Pirates of the Carribean movies and a stint as Barnabas Collins in the recent Dark Shadow novie have kind of soured me toward Depp and his weird characters.

I'm not crossing off this movie just yet but if most of the reviews point toward him being the star then I won't go see the movie in a theater. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-13  06:43pm - 4276 days #1082
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I also enjoy Saoirse as an actress and it's clearly not her lack of talent that sanked The Host because she is a super talented actress. I know because I own two of her movies. The above mentioned Hanna and City of Ember. The previous is an intriguing movie that could use a sequel to expand on her character but I much prefer City of Ember. There is very little not to like about that movie and the acting from all particpants is top notch.

I think one of the main issue's people have with The Host is that since Saoirse is playing two characters living in one body than all conversations between her two characters is essentially all internal but using her voice. That is not necessarily an issue when read in a novel but it must become quickly annoying when heard on screen because it's always the same voice doing all the talking. It's like hearing her arguing with herslef for two hours. It also can't help that the Stephanie Meyer novel's haven't being well translated to the big screen. The Twilight movies have made plenty of money but it's not because they are any good. I've seen all of them and they are pretty bad and worse diverge so much from the novels that they could be tagged as being based on the twilight novels in key areas. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-13  10:18am - 4277 days #1080
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



It's not a happy ending for Warner Bros. as "Jack the Giant Slayer" is the latest reason why Hollywood should maybe reconsider this whole revisionist fairy tale thing.

"Jack" flopped, "Mirror Mirror" didn't exactly set the world on fire and Universal's "Snow White and the Huntsman" just barely made enough (overseas, at that) to warrant a sequel that seems more like a studio obligation than a response to audience enthusiasm. Maybe fairy tales aren't "the new comic book movie" after all?


This isn't a good example of why Hollywood shouldn't make any other fairy tale based movies because it was a very good movie but badly marketed. This movie should never have been marketed to children because the content was too intense for them and not enough for the teenagers which this movie was clearly meant for. I don't know if Singer shot some more intense scenes but I really hope he did and that we will see a directors version because that might be the one that should have mad it to the big screen.

Now Mirror Mirror and the other Snow White movie are far better examples of why Hollywood should stay away from doing fairy tales. This first one thinks that it should be a colorful comedy with some action sequences that were probably funnier on paper than on screen and the other one tried to make a Lord of The Ring movie but with Snow White as the main lead. It might have worked if they had picked a better actress than Kristen Stewart because she sinks the movie whenever she is on screen and if you are going to add a love interest then make sure they actually get together in this one and not in any possible sequel. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-13  10:07am - 4277 days #1079
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


"G.I. Joe," a sequel starring Channing Tatum, Dwayne Johnson and Bruce Willis, secured $41.2 million in domestic ticket sales from Friday through Sunday, according to studio estimates.


Now it's quite possible that the movie will make a profit but it won't be from domestic Box office so this won't be considered a true box office success by any stretch of the imgination. It got a 28% score on Rotten Tomatoes from critics and a 57% from regular viewers while the original had a 34% from critics and 64% from regular viewers.

I'd alo like to add that this sequel does not really star Channing or Bruce because one character basically dies in the beginning of the film and the other one is on screen for only a small part of the film. I believe that one of the main reasons why this film didn't get released last summer is because test audiences had a major issue with the way the character of Channing was killed off in the first minutes of the movie. They basically had to shoot some extra scenes of him bonding with Dwayne's character so that he would have more screen time. Why nother when you will kill him off anyway?

Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Last week's winner, animated prehistoric adventure "The Croods," slipped to second place with $26.5 million in North America (the United States and Canada).


This one will definetely make a profit but again it's only because of Oversea box office takes. The movie has only made 125 millions in North America with a budget of 135 millions

Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Another new release, sci-fi romantic thriller "The Host," finished in sixth place with $11 million. The movie is based on a novel by Stephenie Meyer, author of the "Twilight" vampire series that became a blockbuster movie franchise.


If they were hoping to catch fire in a bottle with another of Stephaine Meyer book then they have failed miserably because this movie will not make enough money to generate a sequel (Not sure if one was ever planned but seeing has this is Hollywood then they were thinking about it). It only got a 10% rating at Rotten Tomatoes from critics and 58% from regular viewers.

Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


In fourth place, thriller "Olympus Has Fallen" earned $14 million during its second weekend. The movie stars Gerard Butler and Morgan Freeman in the tale of a White House under attack. Disney's "Oz the Great and Powerful" came in fifth with $11.6 million.


This one is doomed to be a bomb. It had to make it's money from domestic box office because it's too USA centric to appeal to Oversea markets. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-13  09:35am - 4277 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I think bibo's suggestion is the best one because I'm not aware of any cam site where you can see free cam shows. The bulk of cam sites that I know will show you the girl but you'll have to pay to see her do some stuff above just talking. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-13  09:30am - 4277 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
1-I don't like surprises so make sure that what is in the members section is clearly visible in the preview section.

2-If you offer videos then make sure a small preview of some or part of them is availabe. I don't want to see more thna a few seconds or a minute of content but make sure that you see a good sample of what the video will contain.

3-If you offer photosets then the same thing applies for pics as it those for the videos. make sure than you can view a nice sampling of what is available in the entire set.

4-Info on updates is important.

5-Info on the model is also quite nice. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-02-13  03:51pm - 4282 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Thank You Very Much for letting us know. I don't think we need to tell you that Khan is a special guy and I'm sure I'm not alone in saying that he is well liked and that we appreciate everything he does. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-31-13  09:06am - 4284 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^If it is then it's a very old one because many sites have had the 1$ trial for a long time and that's basically the same thing. The only difference is that people are more knowledgable now and don't fall for it. Let's be honest. Why would any porn site offer someone access to the bulk of their content for just 1$? It already cost them more than that in credit card processing fees so they could never make any money no matter how many people join the site. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-28-13  06:28pm - 4286 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I find that both women have very beautiful faces and their bodies are amazing but I don't classify Asphyxia in the same category of tatted ladies as Christy. Yes they each have multiple tattoos but Asphyxia has only a few small ones located on various parts of her body but Christy has a shoulder to wrist sleeve on her left arm, a half sleeve on her lower right arm, 2 tattoos located on her upper right arm, a rose on the right side of neck, a bunch of roses on her lower stomach, one tatto on the outside of her right thigh, one of her lower left leg, one tramp stamp above buttock a large colorfull tattoo on the back of her neck and the Old Spice Ship covering most of her back.

I can sometime overlook small tattoos but as much as I know I would love a tattoo free Christy. I find that I don't enjoy her scenes because of all her tattoos. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-25-13  06:19pm - 4289 days #603
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I checked and yt doesn't appear so. Sorry but I guess you'll have to buy some credits. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-24-13  05:10pm - 4290 days #601
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by elephant:


Hi Khan

I wonder if you can look into adding 21roles.com , looks like its credit based but very unique.


I don't think this one needs to be added since it appears to be an off-shoot of 21sextury. I guess it's either for people who don't want to join the site but want some of their scenes or it's a way to make a cash grab.

Save your money and join 21sextury. You may have to join more than just that site since I don't know if they use content from more than one network. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-24-13  09:32am - 4291 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Dracula:


You would think that, but Microsoft is all about making money. They are known for pushing people forward regardless of how people feel about it.


Although I am certain that Microsoft is mostly all about the money. Isn't it the same for every other company that offers similar products/services?. It's true that they keep pushing people to upgrade but if they weren't then they would have stopped doing business years ago. The reality for anything associated with computers is that it is nearly obsolete the day it's released and if you don't have an upgrade in the works then someone else will be able to steal part of your market.

I know it gets frustrating when Microsoft stops supporting some of their older products but there comes a time when it's not only bad business but dangerous to the user. I used to love My Win XP OS but that thing had so many holes that the patches and upgrades could never keep up with the spyware and trojans. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-23-13  12:02pm - 4292 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^In my case that is no longer a problem because I guess Adobe came out with a patch or upgrade because I no longer have that problem. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-23-13  12:01pm - 4292 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^If the story is true then Harry was actually hired to work the lighting equipment but I think the male performer who was scheduled to do the scene had wood problme or didn't show up and he was hired to play the part of the doctor. That was his first porn shoot but definetely not his last. I know peple keep talking aboiut Deep Throat as somekind of masterpiece or something but I was never a fan. It was badly shot, the sex scenes weren't very good and frankly the qulaity of the vid has never been all that good. The two things that can be said for it is that it is probably the best known porn movie of all time and it's the one that has made the most money. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-13  09:24pm - 4292 days #1069
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Justified, with Timothy Oliphant. A cop show. On FX channel.

Upcoming TV series returning for new season:

Game of Thrones. SF/Fantasy series. HBO.


I really like Justified but this is the kind of show that makes me nervous because you are never too sure where they will go and that is sometime a good thing but not so much when it involve's main characters because these tend to meet untimely deaths.

I was aware of Games of Thrones and I love fantasy but it has taken me until this year to start watching this show. It is quite addictive.

I really like the new Sherlock show done by CBS. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-13  09:07pm - 4292 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
People that only know gonzo porn and don't care for any acting or stotyline might not care but I did and to me Harry was one of the best. The guy could play almost any role, actually act and be believable and was a great sex performer as well.

My condolensces are with his family. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-13  08:54pm - 4292 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I tried to update my flash player (from Adobe), but that didn't help.



I had sort of a similar problem sometime last year with Firefox. In my case it was movies on some of the Kink sites that I couldn't play. I also had to download an update for Flash and it also didn't work for me at first and then after a week or so later. It started to work. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-13  05:46pm - 4297 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


If someone doesn't think those scarred, plastic-stuffed globes look absolutely horrendous, they either have a strong stomach or they need eyeglasses.


They are pretty hard to watch but those look rather new to me because she wasn't sporting those not that long ago. The scars from a prior implant surgery have been made even more obvious now with the bigger implants. The lips are also hard to watch but the pic could have been taken after the procedure so she may not look as intense now. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-13  05:39pm - 4297 days #16
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I'm saying Aletta looks better before surgery than after.


Thanks because I wasn't too sure in which direction you were going. I don't like to use Aletta as an example of bad plastic surgery because she took body alteration to an altogetehr different level than most porn girls do. There is very little of the original Aletta now if anything so she is not representative of what girls have done in the industry.

Originally Posted by hodayathink:


Even with someone like Jenna, it's not like she'd never had plastic surgery before she became big (I might be wrong,


One of Jenna's very first scene (if not the first one) was for Randy West Up and Cummers and she was all natural at that time. I'm not too sure when she started to do the body alteration because she became a contract player quite early in her career and the stuff they do doesn't always translate into the kind of porn I like so I didn't keep track of her. I know that she also started to get tattoos early in her career but not sure if it was implants first and tattoo second or vice versa. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-13  10:00am - 4298 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I absolutely hate it when people use the word ruined to describe a girl that got plastic surgery. It's entirely too strong a word to be used to describe a girl whom you find less attractive


I also don't like that particular word because it is too strong a word to use when discussing a subject like this but I understand why some people use it. I often find that people will use that word because they feel somehow betrayed that a girl they really liked chose to alter her looks in such a drastic way. Of course drastic may also be a bit too strong a word to use but not if it involves the choice of implants most porn girls choose.

Originally Posted by hodayathink:


And in case you're wondering, no I've never seen a girl ruined by surgery, and there are very few that I think looked definitively better before the surgery as opposed to after (Aletta Ocean is the only one I can think of at the moment).


Are you saying that Aletta looks better after the surgery or is it the opposite? Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-13  09:52am - 4298 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by biker:


Add Aletta Ocean and Rebecca Linares.
I did not even recognize Aletta Ocean. She got the full treatment.


Aletta was pretty open about her addiction to plastic surgery. She even posted images of one of her implant surgeries. I don't know if she got help but she said a few years ago that she loved going under the knife. I stopped watching her a few years ago because I couldn't get the the image of what she looked like when she got into the industry to what she looks like now out of my head and that ruined any of her scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-16-13  06:04pm - 4298 days #21
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Even if there were some. They wouldn't be crazy enough to let us know. They are rather possessif of their pot of gold and anonymity is still the best protection. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-16-13  06:01pm - 4298 days #15
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^No I think that is because you are part bat. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-16-13  09:27am - 4299 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I had to look that one up because I had no clue what that was. I wish I hadn't done that because now I know what it is and it's rather discusting to me. Mind you to each their own.

I wish I could offer some suggestions but cam stuff does absolutely nothing for me. Aside from the huge amounts people usually have to pay for some action. The fact that there is just one camera, always one angle, no focus, the video quality is rarely all that good and most of the action is softcore to midcore solo masturbation. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-11-13  08:52am - 4304 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Yes and no because if anyone checks the site out then they will come to the conclusion that it's not an economically viable solution. There aren't many sites that allow members to download entire dvd's so an index is not really something that anyone needs. I think IAFD is still the best tool when it comes to DVD's and they do list the sites where a specific movie can be downloaded. Of course the cost is about the same as buying the actual dvd so all you are getting is the dvd faster than if it had been sent by some kind of courrier.

Mind you I don't think this is what Rearadmiral is looking for anyway. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-11-13  08:44am - 4304 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I agree with you because I will often skip reading some sections on long reviews because I don't want to spend the next 10 minutes reading everything that's on there. I appreciate hard data but I think that some editing is not necessarily a bad thing. I know that I try to do that whenever I can but I'm not always successful because I'm not as good as most of you at writing reviews. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-10-13  06:37pm - 4304 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I know that in ADT's dvd section there is an option to see where you can stream or download a speciric dvd but this will only give you the names of their partner sites but it is still a start. I'm including a link so that you can see what I mean.

http://www.adultdvdtalk.com/movie/buttma...ntion-3/vod-download Long live the Brown Coats.

03-10-13  06:34pm - 4304 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
It as happened a couple of times where I had to alter part of my review because I kept going over the character count in one of the sections (usually the con one). I think RB's suggestion is the best one so simply continue in the bottom line section. Mind you if a site is so bad that you are now writing multiples negative comments in the Bottom Line section then you could always limit the con's to the more griveous ones and add a little notation like: Site is Utter Crap. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-10-13  07:54am - 4305 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I use IE and Firefox and both of these search engines have download managers so I simply start a few downloads and let them do their job while I keep surfing. I don't think this accelerates download speeds but I'm not aware of anything that actually does that. I've always been under the impression that download speeds are a question of your ISP, the server traffic of the site you are looking to download from and your location in the world. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-09-13  09:34am - 4306 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^It's hard to tell how much Paris was involved in the release of her sex tape but I believe that she had to sign off on it for the movie to be legally shown or otherwise her lawyers would have had no problem stopping the release and suing the studio and Rick. If it wasn't that clear to people that Paris is a narcassistic individual befire they saw the video then it's quite apparent just by the wau she acts troughtout most of it. I am quiyte sure that she has plenty of other sex tapes and if it wasn't for the fact that her family got involved and pretty much told her that she would be cut-off from Grandpa's money then we would have seen other tapes come out.

I'm not really into POV porn and this pretty much what you get with all celebrity sex tapes except that you also get as a no extra bonus the badly lit, badly shot and usually grainy looking porn. What's not to like about that? The only semi-decent sex tapes that I have seen were the one from Tila Tequila and the Shauna Sand one and the only reason why those are loke that is because these people knew that the tape would be released. It's certainly obvious with Tila because she has sex with two female porn performers. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-09-13  09:23am - 4306 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't know how much is posturing and how much is real but I do know that China is the one that will have to get involved because anything else and we could have one hell of a mess on our hands. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-13  08:56am - 4307 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I never actually saw a lot of her porn video but she is such a narcassistic individual that I can't imagine it is all that good. Mind you most celebrity sex tapes usually fall under the Mehh! category anyway.

It is still amazing that a woman who's claim to fame is that she was friends with Paris Hilton, banged a lot of music and sports personality, was married for four years and did at least one sex tape with an ex-boyfriend managed to become a multi-millionaire with an iextensive empire.

There was a time when that kind of woman would have been pariah and no one would want to have their name associated with her's but these are modern times. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-13  08:48am - 4307 days #1066
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've said it before but I think Disney would be much wiser starting from scatch and doing what J.J Abrams did for Star trek. That is to shoot all new movies starting with Star Wars and then continuing beyond. This way you could use todays technology to shoot the kind of movie Lucas wantd to do and it would be a lot easier to do sequels beyond Return of the Jedi because the actors would all be at the right age for the story.

I for one would have no problem paying money to see a new version of Star wars because I would always have the original to enjoy. Of course Disney must avoid doing The Phantom menace and all of other prequels because those movies were giant piles of sith poo. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-13  08:40am - 4307 days #1065
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I agree that except for tweaking some special effects in the original trilogy then most of the other changes Lucas did were pure cinematographic sacrilege. Replacing Shaw with Hayden made absolutely no sense since we spent two movies seeing that a dead jedi who comes back as a spirit look's exactly like he did at the moment of his death then why would Luke see a younger version of his father. This is made even more obvious since he never actually saw that version of his father.

I'm actually more pissed at the Greedo and Han Solo scene in the cantina because Lucas completely altered a very important trait of Solo by adding the usuless Greedo shot first effect. Solo is a tough no nonsense mercenary who has no problem shooting a guy first if he treathens him in the original print but after the new version then he is simply a soon to be nice guy who's defending himself. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-07-13  06:33pm - 4307 days #1062
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


They weren't all young in the original series. Alec Guiness (Obi-Wan) and Peter Cushing (General Moff Tarkin) were born in 1914 and '13 respectively, making them both in their 60s when they played their roles in Episode IV. Of course both characters are killed off rather climatically.



Very true but both these actors were never seen playing a younger versions of themselves prior to doing Star Wars but all of us have seen Mark, Carrie and Harrison play their roles when they were much younger than now. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-07-13  06:31pm - 4307 days #1061
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Theresa is one amazingly beautiful woman. I would really like to see her play a role where she can talk normally and not as an American so that I can hear her speak with her Australian accent.

I definetely agree with you that you should wait until Jack gets to dvd or you can see it in a regular theater because I don't think Imax and or 3D is worth it. Nor do I think that paying nearly 16$ is a good idea. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-06-13  07:11pm - 4308 days #1057
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I saw Jack the Giant Slayer on the weekend and I really enjoyed it. The story is decent, the acting is quite good and casting is top notch. I think the biggest problem is that the studio didn't know how to market the movie and this is often deadly with these kind of movies. If you choose to target young children than you have to make sure that the content will not make parents cringe during the movie and when you are talking about giants killing and eating people than you are getting close to making some paretns newrvous. In return if you want to target young male then there needs to be a little more action, a little more blood and guts. I don't know if there are 2 versions of this movie and unless there is a direcors cut later on dvd/Bluray then I will never know but it wouldn't surpise me to find out that some scenes never made it onto th screen and some were edited to remove the more gruseome aspect.

I didn't regret spending my 11$ on this movie but if some of you can be patient then I think you will really enjoy it once it gets to dvd. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-06-13  06:59pm - 4308 days #1056
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I heard that Mark, Carrie and Harrison are all scheduled to make an appearance in a futur Star Wars movie but let me state that I hope this is just someone floating an idea because I truly hope to not see any of them make any kind of cameo appearance. Lucas already fucked enough with the entire Star Wars universe that we don't need a new company to insert their own clusterfucks.

Return of the Jedi was 30 years ago and although everyone looked great back then. None of them look remotely like they did back then. Carrie as the youngest is 56, Mark is 61 and Harrison is a ripe old 70. I'd say that they have all aged pretty well considering but my idea of them is as those young rebel fighters and not as grand-parents.

If they plan on using them then what kind of timeline are we looking at? 30 years after the fall of the Empire? Long live the Brown Coats.

03-03-13  05:07pm - 4311 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Are you making somekind of joke? I aks because Kim is only where she is because of the sex tape she did. Some might debate that she was always destined to be a reality star becuae of her connection with Paris Hilton but I'm of the belief that her sex tape is the only reason that she is who he is.

I'd also like to add that she has already done Playboy. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-02-13  07:17am - 4313 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Have you ever watched St-Elsewhere? There's an amazing scene where the character of Howie Mandel Dr Fiscus wakes up after heart surgery and looks at the scars on his chest and is sadden by them and a patient who underwent penil implants is in a bed beside him. The patient with the implant is told to wint until the scras heal before attempting to use the pump but he decides to go ahead and use the pum and if my memory is correct we see the face of Howie as you hear a pumping sound on the other side of the curtain and them a loud bang as though a bag as exploded.
Howie thinks the mand just blew is implant but he then pulls the curtains back and you see that he used a paper bag and was simply trying to make Howie smile...It worked. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-02-13  07:05am - 4313 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


What the fuck does "the primacy of truth" even mean? Are there schools out there that don't hold "truth" as a value?


If I were to make an educated guess then I would say that they put telling the truth above anything else. Of course that probably means that they either teach people how to lie so well that you can almost never tell(we could verify this if any politician went to this school) or they truly believe that the truth is not something to be played with.

Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Either way I ultimately get pissed that all the critics and porn-bashers totally miss the economic reality of "doing it for the money"


I'm less pissed than you but it's more the hipocrisy of a beauty pageant removing the crown because the winner does not epitomize the good qualities the pageant stands for. Maybe somebody can tell me what those are because I was under the impression that good looks(not necessarily all natural), a nice body (again not necessarily natural) and an ability to B.S better than all the other contestant is what it is all about. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-02-13  06:45am - 4313 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Thank You Capn. That made me burst out in laughter.

Now back to the question. It really depends on the video but it's not unusual for me to skip a little ahead or fast forward on some of them. It usually depends on what kind of video I am watching. If I' watching lesbian porn than I probably won't skip or fast forward but gonzo tends to make me want to do that. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-02-13  06:41am - 4313 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm sure a much smarter person than me will better answer your questions but I believe that H.264 is a superior type of video file with better compression. They are usually a lot smaller than their WMV counterpart. I will always pick that type over WMV whenver it is offered but less because of the overall quality of the video but because the file is smaller and that means that I can download more and it will take less space on my hard drives.

I don't think a 720x480 video file vs a 640x480 video file will be significantly be better visually but maybe I am wrong. Long live the Brown Coats.

1101-1150 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 22 Page 23 24 31 38 45 52 59 71 72 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.26 seconds.