Glasses Fetish Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Naughty Bookworms (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Geeky, nerdy, librarian, teacher-type porn.
- Very large site with 556 scenes on it.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Nearly 500 models.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Remastered updates are bringing life to some of their oldest and best scenes. |
| Cons: |
- The new updates stopped in 2017 but they have released remastered scenes since then.
- They don’t do the best job of meeting the niche.
- The downside of being a site that’s been around a long time. The oldest scenes are far below the newer scenes in technical quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this is one of the most common niches in porn. They do switch it up some. It’s not always an older male teacher with a younger female student. They have some older female teachers with younger guys. There are some scenes that are supposed to be two bookworks/nerds and they could both be older or they both could be younger. The part that doesn’t change much is the scenes are filmed in a classroom setting.
As much as I like the remasters they can make a porn collector like me get over-excited like seeing a “new” update from Gracie Glam, then realizing it’s a remastered version of her 2005 scene. I thought, “She hasn’t aged a bit”.
The production values on this site could be higher than they are. Nearly every scene features sex on the teacher’s desk. They at least do have multiple classroom sets so it doesn’t look like every scene is filmed in the same classroom. The stories in the scenes are mostly the same. Student does something bad, stays after class, the teacher spanks her then bends her across his desk. I do think there is a positive to this site. The outfits. The attitudes. The women usually have on something like a schoolgirl outfit and their attitudes vary between bratty to more horny than the teacher. It’s a lot like the site Innocent High except the women on this site don’t wear the same outfit like they do on Innocent High.
They have 556 scenes with all scenes between 2014-2017 having a 4K download option along with 1080p and 720p. The pictures could be better quality and some don’t even have a zip download option. It’s an older site but in this day and age of cookie-cutter porn, it’s sometimes better to go back and find good old scenes, especially when they’re remastered to 1080p or 720p quality.
For this genre, it’s a good site and I think most fans of the genre would be happy with it. There are some big name models on here too. One of the new remasters is the Alexis Texas scene and Amia Miley has a very good scene on this site. The remasters are a selling point to me since they are remastering their best and most popular scenes first. Good site on an even better network. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Naughty Bookworms (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo).
-The female porn star's name is given for each video.
-The posting date is given for each video.
-The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw.
-All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video.
-There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex? |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC.
-There is no zip file for the earliest galleries.
-But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway?
-Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download.
-Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness.
-Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive.
Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive.
This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire.
-Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection.
-Quality of the older videos is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex.
Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries.
Naughty Bookworms is part of the Naughty America network. So membership in Naughty Bookworms gives full access to Naughty America, and vice versa.
This is a large site, with 514 videos. You also gain access to the Naughty America network of 37 sites, with over 4,000 scenes.
So if you like your sex raw and crude, Naughty Bookworms (and Naughty America) has a huge amount of content for you to sample.
I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude.
I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine.
Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Naughty Bookworms (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Quality 1080p, 720p, and lower quality (in case you're still on dial up)
- multiple uploads a week (across the network there is about one a day)
- zip downloads for pix (over 100 per set)
- archived live shows 9in this genre). I think this is the best part of the site- with regular guys calling the action the girls are dirtier and more fun.
- Hot girls who ever your favorite is odds are she's shot for NA. If you like up and comers they shoot plenty of them too.
- Mobile version of site (see my review of that too)
- newsletter/twitter account often sends out specials where you can save 50% or more off a membership
- over 30 sites included (some dead sites)
- some softer ("girlfriend friendly") shoots (although most pop shots are facials) |
| Cons: |
- I keep getting an error message saying my account is inactive and I have to reset it. It only takes a minute or two but it's getting really annoying to have to do this over and over again.
- cross sells, every time I have to go through the above process I have to decline memberships to other sites, again this is really annoying when I have to do this several times a week (sometime multiple times in the same day.
- repetitive scenario can get a little tired. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest knock on NA is they discontinued the live shows which I was a huge fan of. The other down side is with every site in the network focused on a different fantasy it gets very repetitive very quickly.
That said the deals (a lot of time you can grab a membership for between $10 and $15) and the great quality and talent means I usually re-up every couple of months. The preview section is rather generous and gives you a good idea of the content (there's no surprised once you've joined.
There is now a NA Live section where you can see amateurs being naughty, but it seems like everyone I'm interested in is an additional charge. :( |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
