| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Wouldn't it be the girl who no longer needs to buy lube?
|
04-05-10 01:52pm
|
Reply
177
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
streamingeagle's Comment
Like with a lot of other porn retailers I wouldn't use the term "maximizing the profit" as much as the term "minimizing the loss". Sales are down across the board, and you can no longer assume anyone who sells porn is swimming in large cash piles.
|
03-27-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
As long as it takes.
My view, a boy/girl scene should be a quick 5 minute scene, even 10 minutes is stretching it.
But an all-girl scene, WOW they can go on forever and ever and never get boring!
The worst thing a producer can do is make the scene feel rushed, where the goal is to get in as many various positions as possible. I call this "bingo porn" and don't like it at all.
|
03-26-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
179
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
One dollar and fifty-five cents
|
03-25-10 02:43am
|
Reply
180
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Just confirming here -
I went to their join page, and the cross-sale for that other site was visible and unchecked. The site took me to epoch for subscribing, and I've never before heard of epoch ever using hidden cross sales.
|
03-25-10 02:33am
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
So you guys really want to be stranded on an island with your fantasy pornstar, where she has no access to a razor?
|
03-22-10 09:47am
|
Comment
182
|
Skinny Fans
(0)
|
|
03-19-10 10:37am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
183
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It's just porn.
Are we paying for the pixel dimensions, or for the visual of the images? Don't let things like this piss you off. Make a quick note of it and move on. Site put up probably $10-15k to create the 50 photosets, to which they are asking $30 for access to all of it. Is this worth letting such things get under your skin?
|
03-13-10 04:03pm
|
Reply
184
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Babelicious does not license from InFocusGirls , I-F-G is all exclusive material. But both these sites buy works from some of the same contributing photographers.
But question, does babes.tv contain the archive of all their former works, or is that removed? Thanks
|
03-13-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted "yes".
Look, one politician is just one politician, he is not even remotely close to being powerful enough to ban porn.
So I mean, if the choice is between an otherwise decent candidate who just doesn't like porn, and a total douchebag numbnut from the other party...
Even beyond all that, the way national politics works today in America, we're not voting for individuals, we're voting for the party. I'd prefer our government not be like this, but it is, they are largely just there to place a straight party-line vote, in which case his individual views on porn are largely irrelevant.
|
03-10-10 08:50am
|
Reply
186
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The jokes are more like out-takes. Pictures that were not included in the released photosets.
They cross-promote with Eve Angel (and also with Sapphic Erotica in the eurogirlsongirls site), they give you the full photoset, just not the video. So it's something more than just the header card. Really I think they kind of boxed themselves in with the name of their site.
My wish for DDF would be to return to making regular girl/girl videos - at least once in a while. They produced some of the best out there, but haven't for a long time now. Of course I'm excluding the fetish ones, hotlegsandfeet / houseoftaboo , those sites are not to my tastes.
|
02-24-10 10:53am
|
Reply
187
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Just a play on my username with what you wrote ;)
|
02-13-10 08:06am
|
Reply
188
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Don't blame it on me!
Anyways, the site isn't "supposed" to be a porn site, it's more like a way for goth girls to socialize with each other while being naked. I don't know.
|
02-12-10 07:15pm
|
Comment
189
|
Adult 4D
(0)
|
|
02-10-10 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It can be a great video, but it's just not suited for mainsteam porn. A handjob clip longer than about 5 minutes is just excruciatingly boring! It's just not feasible for porn producers to pay the money they have to for such a short clip. Good vids are reduced to the true amateur stuff, and fetish stuff.
|
02-06-10 09:50am
|
Reply
191
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
DickH's Comment
I think it's that the way things are going, more and more girls go with the shaved look - I bet it's getting continuously harder to find the numbers of unshaven girls to shoot.
I don't know, I think ATK still does a good job, considering the times we are in. 'Course it's all subjective.
|
02-03-10 05:11pm
|
Reply
192
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
It's not so much a scene but just a moment for a photograph just to say it was technically accomplished.
|
02-02-10 01:00pm
|
Reply
193
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
Just an FYI, you may have noticed, x-art is comprised of work done up by some of the same contributors to femjoy, so probably not the best site to site transition if you're seeking for a new look. I'd suggest checking out watch4beauty.com , or mc-nudes.com
Like on the flip side, I reviewed breath-takers.com and even though the updates come slowly, I felt the quality and passion in the girls is there, then the replies from others were along the lines of "yeah, but not enough updates". Some people want quality, others just want the massive quantity.
To the other questions above, their videos are dedicated scenes, unlike what Met-Art puts out. They are usually 5 minutes in length with a song playing throughout. They certainly lean more art than porn. Not saying it as a bad thing, they are good videos, just don't go in to it expecting something else.
|
02-02-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Generally download the largest. The exception is there just is not enough benefit in a 12mbps 1080p encode over a 6 or 8mbps 720p video for me to want to download the larger file, unless it is a scene with my fav girl of course.
|
01-30-10 08:52am
|
Reply
195
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
redsky's Comment
DDF is still giving about 10 genuinely new updates (pics & video) each week throughout their network. Bandwidth is always an issue for all sites, but just keep in mind that this is not something the owners can just "flip a switch" and speeds are faster. Bandwidth is not an infinite resource, it is something that is shared amongst many people at a time. And despite what everyone likes to claim, bandwidth is not *that* cheap, nor are the servers which are required to keep the pipe full. We're not talking the 10mbps cable internet connections, DDF has at least a 10gbps connection, probably much faster than that. But divide it out amongst the popularity of the site. Many other factors too, like DDF is a popular target of hackers who constantly bombard their servers trying to sniff out usable password combinations. It all takes their toll on the performance of their equipment.
They are trying to provide the best connection to everyone, but their are some limits that are not so easily controlled.
|
01-24-10 03:07pm
|
Reply
196
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
If you really like Jana, jump on in! Otherwise give it a pass.
Don't expect 4000px imagesets and 1080p videos, but what they do give, if you're a big fan of Jana the site is great.
|
01-22-10 11:04am
|
Reply
197
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
babespotting's Reply
Thanks for the update. Oh and it's spelled Eufrat. No worries, there are some stranger spellings around on other sites :) Keep working with her for your sites and I'll keep resubscribing!
Anyways, also have whomever is encoding the videos to check into compressing the audio - right now it's uncompressed PCM, where you can easily cut 40 or 50mb out of each file without any noticeable quality loss.
|
01-18-10 02:48pm
|
Reply
198
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
New updates are available as the usual flash video, as well as downloadable .mov files (no option currently for .wmv). I would say hold off though and hopefully the webmaster will respond about the aspect ratios. Otherwise I suppose if you have no issues using VLC and selecting the option to force a specific AR then go ahead. I like that this site has a unique style of videos not often seen elsewhere.
|
01-14-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
199
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Yea, have a subscription currently. The videos are very crisp, actually near flawless. Even the outdoor videos look great (where if done incorrectly, the trees & such take up all the bitrate, leaving the girl pixelated, but this isn't the case here). Only issue is they are not in the correct aspect ratio, hopefully they'll take care of. H.264 encoded video streams in a .mov file support a custom pixel aspect ratio attribute if you have the software tools to edit that, but just better if it is taken care of on the website's end.
|
01-14-10 09:52am
|
Reply
200
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
babespotting's Reply
Thanks for responding. The standard PAL format uses non-square pixels, to look proper on a computer most of the website's videos should be stretched to a 4:3 aspect ratio (like 768x576). The new Eufrat video is strange, as that one needs to be stretched to a 1:1 aspect ratio (like 720x720) to look proper.
|
01-14-10 03:41am
|
