Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : kkman112 (0)  

Feedback:   All (137)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (5)  |   Replies (121)

Other:   Replies Received (36)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 101-125 of 137 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
101
Visit Brutal Dildos

Brutal Dildos
(0)
Reply of Tom22's Comment

I agree. While I admire a site's willingness to prevent stealing/pirating of their videos, things like massive logos and DRM on their members content is really unacceptable.

A small logo that doesn't cover much, and is possibly semi-transparent is ok though.


05-13-07  08:26am

Reply
102
Visit Curvy Kitty

Curvy Kitty
(0)
Reply of Bo M's Review

I am always skeptical of a 100% rating. Not to mention that it would be nice if you followed the review guidelines. You should put your points for and against (pros and cons) in complete sentence with a dash before each sentence to better show each point. Also, "This chick is SO GREAT!!!" is an opinion that should have been thrown in the bottom line along with the explanations of your pros/cons. For instance, your pros focus only on her abilities, and the bottom line only focuses on updates. Here is an example to make it cleaner, just for future reference:

PROS:
- Great skills!
- Does great deepthroat blowjobs!
- A is what I like about site navigation. (EXAMPLE)
- The site as great video quality (900kb/s WMV/MPG/AVI). (EXAMPLE)
- Images are high-res (1600px+) (EXAMPLE)

CONS:
- Needs better navigation

BOTTOM LINE:
This chick is SO GREAT !!! Her skills in pleasing her man is like a dream and her soft body is really wonderful to watch. I especially love the way she gives head and how she deepthroats and keep the dick deep down her throat extremely long and makes me get nutts when imagining myself being treated by her.
Every minute with her must be really terrific !! She always keep her site very fresh and up-to-date. Maybe that is why it is a bit difficult to remember what you have checked or not. But the site is wonderful !!


You should also expand on the pros and cons in the bottom line, your entire review seems to focus on the model for the most part and barely states anything about the site beyond updates and a catch line to join a site that you did not explain very well.

Just for future reference, and to help out the others on the site. :)


05-13-07  08:18am

Comment
103
Visit Justine Joli

Justine Joli
(0)

Naw...

I was skeptical of joining her site. She is one of my all-time favorite models. I love her work on the Kink network, but did not want to join her personal site for obvious reasons. It looks like nothing more than a blog which is scary enough. SnowDude made a great review that has definitely convinced me not to. Having to log in multiple times, little and poor content. It's sad really. It is similar to Cythera's site (Club Cytherea). They have great content on other sites and networks, but their personal sites stink, unfortunately.

05-11-07  05:52pm

Replies (0)
Rating
104
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)

86.0
No Review.
05-11-07  05:45pm

Reply
105
N/A Reply of Your News

Good idea! I would typically say it is a bad action to take if it weren't for the fact that you can browse back and answer previous polls! Since you can do this, it really defeats the purpose of updating the poll every day since any you miss you can go back and answer later. I'm sure you guys would have trouble getting a new question every day for all eternity anyway... :)

05-11-07  05:41pm

Reply
106
Visit Ema's Place

Ema's Place
(0)
Reply of djwolf's Comment

I am skeptical not only because it is 100% rating but because it is a new site and has not had a chance to collect members yet. I will wait with this for a while to see what others say if more join.

05-10-07  02:15pm

Reply
107
N/A Reply of Your News

I love the new enhancements, except for one thing: I have seen people get rated bad with no reason why. People I would really put a good trust rating to many anonymously rate bad here and there with no comment. I think you should require a comment of X length (maybe 50 characters?) be attached when rating someone badly.

05-08-07  04:02pm

Reply
108
Visit Bubble Girls

Bubble Girls
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

Drooler, I agree. It is a ripoff. I was rather shocked seeing the 'UPDATED WEEKLY' banner on the site, but when I joined the 'updates' section shows no new updates since January 2006. That is false advertising for one thing, so they should have removed that banner if they still wanted to offer old content.

My guess is they packed up shop and left. If I could, I would get my money back as it is probably just sitting in an account somewhere.

Personally, as I said, I wouldn't join unless you just want to try to grab the old videos. They seem pretty popular elsewhere.


05-05-07  11:44am

Review
109
Visit All Hairy

All Hairy
(0)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Medium ammount of content
- User-submission image board
- Non-professional models
- Model directory
Cons: - Some content not exclusive
- Some videos can only be downloaded in chunks
- Video quality varies
- Image size varies
- Not much user-submitted content
Bottom Line: This site has a fair amount of content, but could use more. The models are typically average-looking, but some are not exclusive to the site. The only videos/models I can clearly say are exclusive are the few that where an "All Hairy" shirt in the beginning.

The site design isn't bad, but could use some better search features and model information. It includes a model directory sorted by name alphabetically.

The user-submission gallery is a good idea, but there is not a whole lot there and some of it is copied from some other copyrighted site (with watermarks removed), but some looks original.

The video quality varies with many of them showing in a small box on top of a 740x480 black box. The videos, for the most part, can be downloaded in chunks or as a whole. Some videos are WMV (newer videos), older are MPEG.

Images are typically medium sized and good quality (~800-1000px) with very few being massive (2000px+).

If you like hairy girls and want to try out your hand at submitting your own or just viewing what few others have posted and seeing some hairy girls have sex or play with themselves, then go for it. If you are looking for the more erotic aspect of hair, there are better sites out there.

05-05-07  11:33am

Replies (1)
Reply
110
Visit Spring Thomas

Spring Thomas
(0)
Reply of marquis58401's Comment

I have heard that too, but I am pretty sure it is a rumor... and not true. I have seen the site in the past, and the tour on her front page still seems to add new content here and there. I will keep track on this for a while to see if it is still true.

05-05-07  09:31am

Comment
111
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(0)

Consideration

I am considering this site as my next join. They seem to have some pretty good stuff here. I have seen some of their content and it is definitely good. Clearly I see they don't have a lot yet, but may not be as big of a clincher for me with this site. They seem to have a variety of content, but seems to focus mostly on being playful. The models seem to laugh and have fun in the content I have seen. HD is a plus, very few have HD video. If I do join I will surely write a review!

05-05-07  09:25am

Replies (1)
Review
112
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Plenty of content
- High-bitrate, large videos
- Great quality images
- Beautiful, skinny European models
- Good site design
Cons: - Redundant after watching the first few (mechanical)
- Not amateur in nature
- Bit expensive
Bottom Line: Overall a good site site for lesbian sex. The video quality is excellent (along with the images). It features all girls (Sapphic literally means lesbianism). The girls are the typical gorgeous, skinny models with breast size going from A to D. The design is good with a lot of search features. The reason I left is that the content seems the same for most. Girls lick, toy, touch, prod, etc. but it seems almost mechanical after watching a few. Not amateur by a long shot. The site is a tad expensive also. I recommend it if you have a European model fetish (does it exist?) or you just absolutely LOVE lesbian video (amateur or not).

05-05-07  09:19am

Replies (0)
Reply
113
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I keep in mind that they might be biased, but then again if a site is really bad (or really good) it has merit. I try to sort through ones that don't appear legit.

05-05-07  01:18am

Reply
114
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Can't afford the bandwidth? Use P2P technology. It works. I think at this point ALL video should be at least full-screen TV quality MINIMUM. Sites that don't have this, I don't stay. DRM? No, just... no.

05-05-07  01:14am

Reply
115
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I am not into the matures as much, but there are many out there that are hot. I know a lot of people fantasize about that hot friend's mom.

05-05-07  01:12am

Reply
116
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Totem (mainly), Mplayer, or VLC. I use Linux. Period.

05-05-07  01:10am

Reply
117
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Not a huge deal to me and even though I advocate safe-sex; I still prefer no condom for the creampies and I think it brings on this suspenseful "Is he ganna do it?" feeling (especially in homemade/amateur content).

05-05-07  01:09am

Reply
118
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Planning on switching to Cable. Would grab fiber the moment it gets here (if it ever gets here... listening AT&T???).

05-05-07  01:05am

Reply
119
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Don't have a portable device to watch it on.

05-05-07  01:04am

Reply
120
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the site is reliable, I love to hear about updates to the site or content.

05-05-07  01:04am

Reply
121
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Firefox, best Linux browser. Before I switched to Linux, and before Firefox... if you are going use IE, I recommend Maxthon. It takes IE and adds Firefox-like plugins, interface, and tabs!

05-05-07  01:02am

Reply
122
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

WMV does not work well on linux. I prefer Xvid/Divx due to great quality for filesize, but will take quicktime or MPEG as well. Flash needs updated to compete. Will Silverlight bring that change?

05-05-07  01:01am

Reply
123
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Usually take a few days and look at similar offerings and completion to choose best offer.

05-05-07  12:57am

Reply
124
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It is VERY important to me. I would like to know at least about how often updates occur and that updates ARE occurring.

05-05-07  12:55am

Reply
125
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Lack of showing when updates occurred tips me off. At this point, if I can't see updates I have no reason to believe the site is even being updated.

05-05-07  12:47am


Shown : 101-125 of 137 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.29 seconds.