Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Both eroberlin and femjoy feature a lot of sets taken outside in various locations but I would not consider these locations on either site to be public or risky. Think fields, empty beaches, deserted country roads etc
|
12-13-11 12:50am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Ms Pacman, obviously
|
12-12-11 02:56am
|
Review
178
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
65.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ ~250 HD videos
+ ~200 matching photo sets
+ 720P video at a bitrate of 5000kbps VC-1 codec
+ Lots of variation in scene locations.
+ Good number of models wear very sexy latex/fetish gear
+ Mostly solo/masturbation but also a couple of lez scenes and 1(!) hardcore scene
+ Latter photo sets are upto 3500px and look great
+ No DRM
+ No regional pricing
+ No download limits
+ Download manager supported
+ Great speeds of 30mbit plus |
Cons: |
- Expensive at $30 per month
- Very little variation of models. Nearly all slim teen clones
- Bad members area with little to no user interface
- Holiday snaps feel
- No bonus sites or network access
- Updates come at inconsistant times.
- Not all videos come with photo sets
- ~50 of the videos are less than 10 minutes long.
- ~50 photo sets contain less than 50 photos
- Latter videos are badly encoded and don't support DXVA enabled playback |
Bottom Line: |
This is a classic example of a site that needs to put in just a little bit more effort if they want to satisfy us demanding porn users. Besides feeling a little amateur, they don't do anything really all that wrong content wise. Unfortunately there is always someone out there doing it better. The majority of the models are on other softcore/nude sites where both the technical quality of the video and photos are better as well as having a more professional style to the photography. The last thing I want to do when a friend or relative returns from holiday is to sit through their photos of the same tree from multiple angles. Unfortunately that is what a lot of the scenes on this site feel like. This level of amateurishness also rears its ugly head with the user interface design of the members area. I use the word design as loosely as possible as the only design that has gone on here is to decide to use some purty colors. When all, and yes I do mean all ~250 updates are on a single 3 mile long index page with no search or any other usability features you can spend a fair amount of time just waiting for that page to load. I feel sorry for anyone on a slower connection as you might as well take the dog for a walk while its loading.
In my opinion softcore sites are all about appreciation of the female form in as much detail as possible. When sites like Femjoy offer far, far more content, more varied models, better shot content at higher quality AND at a cheaper price I see no reason for a membership here unless you specifically want the more amateur feel. At half the price its worth a put for a month but for $30 I feel the money is far better spent elsewhere. |
|
12-12-11 02:42am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
179
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the kind words, it makes writing reviews a whole lot easier when I get feedback that they are appreciated. As luck would have it I am currently a member of eroberlin.com which I plan to be my next review...
|
11-15-11 09:45am
|
Review
180
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
72.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets
+ All exclusive content
+ Zip downloads for photos
+ No DRM, no download limits
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup. |
Cons: |
- Short scenes ~15 min long each
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene
- No streaming
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps.
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video. |
Bottom Line: |
Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.
Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it. |
|
11-15-11 02:55am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
181
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
10-20-11 01:12am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
In a time when 11 year olds are barefoot and pregnant I would not be suprised if half the cast of "18 Dreams 73" were quite literally MILFs.
|
10-09-11 01:12pm
|
Reply
183
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
HoneyChest.com has a few HD scenes with Dominno too. A few more details about the site would be nice but good effort for a first review.
|
10-09-11 01:23am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
There are lots of reasons a person would end up in porn with each of those reasons bringing its own set of struggles that the person will have to deal with. As slutty said, I would also say drugs and alcohol would be up there for a lot but not because they are pornstars. Find any uneducated young person who is a pornstar, musician, actor etc and give them lots of money for relatively little work. They will find they have lots of disposable income and a lot of time on their hands. Meaning that going out every night of the week, getting pissed / smashed and sleeping all day is a reality which is hard to resist.
|
10-09-11 01:16am
|
Reply
185
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Great review although I would add that starting late 2010 some updates are recycled from older scenes. They are usually re-edited but that can sometimes knock 10 minutes off the original scene. For example, all of the last 10 or so freaksofboobs updates are recycled and on other sites 1 update per month is. Sometimes they are labeled as such with remastered written on the scenes download page near the title but other times they are passed off as new.
|
10-06-11 12:14am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
A combination of things, there is no point if a site updates on a regular basis if its poor quality or uninteresting. Regularity of updates + good quality, both technical and production + great models = success
|
10-05-11 10:54am
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'll take all of the above please.
|
10-04-11 12:36am
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Are we talking models or producers? The Russians win hands down as far as models go but I dont think a particular nationality shines as producers. I know and love stuff from Italians, Americans, Germans, Brits, Frenchies to name only a few.
|
10-01-11 01:02am
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Spending a, quite frankly, ungodly amount of time organising my huge collection almost to the point of OCD.
|
09-29-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
190
|
Dirtygardengirl
(0)
|
Reply of
alexthorn's Reply
I do like your content and if you decide to allow uses to download then please let me know and I will join in a instant. Like I said in my original comment, its possible for anyone to install tools that allow them to download your videos but its a pain in the ass to do that so you are not stopping people downloading, you are just making it a little harder and annoying them.
But I wish you the best of luck :)
|
09-29-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
In a civilized country you go to a massage parlour for a massage and a brothel for the happy ending. What is the world comming to?
|
09-28-11 12:54am
|
Reply
192
|
Dirtygardengirl
(0)
|
Reply of
alexthorn's Reply
My comment was written over 6 months ago and I do admit you seem to have a lot more videos available but they are all still streaming only. Its your site and you are of course free to do what you want with it but I can tell you now that preventing your paying members from downloading the videos does not in any way stop them from being shared on torrent or bitlocker sites.
As someone who actually pays for porn I can tell you I will not knowingly join a site where I cannot download the content. If you read the reviews and comments by other members on this site you will know that most people feel the same. By not allowing us to download you are hurting your business rather than protecting it. The worst sin you commit is not actually telling people before they sign up that the videos can not be downloaded. That is a very sneaky and underhand business practice which cannot be defended.
|
09-28-11 12:51am
|
Reply
193
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I see so its a resurrected site rather than a new site. Its good of them to label it as a archive site so that members would know up front that it will not be updated.
|
09-06-11 12:36pm
|
Comment
194
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
09-06-11 01:26am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Depends on my mood but the sultry smile not with the mouth but with the eyes can be the sexyest thing on the planet...
|
08-30-11 01:55pm
|
Reply
196
|
Defiled 18
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
While they have in the past done exactly as you suggest(shegotsix.com, analyzedgirls.com to name a few) at least this time the content is exclusive and also higher def than the rest of their network. I dont think the content really fits with any of their other sites so creating a new site was the right thing to do. I hope they do update regularly as the little content that is there is actually very good.
|
08-30-11 10:39am
|
Reply
197
|
Defiled 18
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Still only 10, they havent updated since the site was launched :(
|
08-30-11 07:49am
|
Comment
198
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
|
08-28-11 02:48am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
199
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
lone59's Comment
While I feel your pain, no one likes to be ripped off, how does this relate to Naughty America? Even though you say it is run by the same company I dont think it is relevant to post this comment against NA who provide good value for money.
|
08-13-11 01:46pm
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I develop web based systems in my dayjob and have personal site as a hobby so I need to test in as many browsers as possible. This means my PC's (and phone) have every browser known to man installed.
|
08-13-11 02:27am
|