| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Erotic Snap
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Aha, that's interesting - I had noticed this site too on TGPs but didn't realise they were doing hardcore/artcore/sensualcore/whateveryoucallit.
It looks tempting, but... I can't help feel I'd be much more drawn to these sites if they had a spread of models from 18-30. I suspect one reality is that by their mid-20s, some models have got tattoos and fake boobs, which don't really work in this style of content.
|
09-12-12 09:52am
|
Reply
227
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I concur - the clean modern layout is nice, but it belies a quite basic interface for the site. I guess when they first started the current layout was fine - but I feel they have enough material there now to warrant better browsing/searching facilities.
|
09-12-12 01:56am
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Likewise, I have one by way of a PS3. I rent DVDs by post (cheaper than online!) and where the option exists, I go for the Blu-Ray... although am largely underwhelmed by it.
It's noticeably better on animated films; otherwise, although you can tell it's better if you actually go out of your way to notice it, it makes little difference in the actual enjoyment of the film.
|
09-11-12 01:00am
|
Reply
229
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Review
Thanks for the good, helpful review - this genre sort of appeals to me. But when you say Soapy Massage is disbanded - do you mean it is is no longer updating? The site seems to work OK - I assume all the older scenes are still there and available? And are they included in the membership here?
|
09-10-12 03:21am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
All of the above, and natural! Eyes are definitely a major draw for me; but how they are done, or not, depends on the scene. I like glam femmes-fatales as well as the girl next door...
|
09-10-12 12:30am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What RustyJ said. Despite our gripes about prices, and regional pricing, online porn remains hugely good value, when compared either to the price of what DVDs used to cost (and still cost in some shops).
Or indeed compared to the price of mainstream media available online for streaming/downloading etc. (Although admittedly most of the films available on eg iTunes do have slightly higher production values than most porn...)
|
09-07-12 12:26am
|
Reply
232
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
|
Reply of
Spank theMonkey's Review
Thanks for the helpful review, and welcome :) I hadn't heard of this site - easily confused with (intentionally?) Jerkoff Instructors - which appeals to me since as well as the dirty talking, it heavily features nylons, and some great models.
Have you joined/can you compare?
|
09-05-12 02:45pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Er always. Why else download them? Oh, I guess you can browse directly in the zip file... but either way I unzip them.
Either way zip is really just to make the download easier; there will rarely be much difference between the size of the zip and the unzipped pics, so no space to be saved.
|
09-05-12 04:02am
|
Reply
234
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the comment, RA - glad you like this site too. I might take a short break from the artcore genre, but next on my list is Babes network - will do a review as and when I join...
|
09-03-12 11:36pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Good point - although the face is what appeals to me, I guess it's how they use it to salacious effect - so performance is perhaps better. Give me a plain girl with a glint of desire in her eye, over a beautiful one starting into the distance any day! (Of course, this is porn, so the idea is to have both...)
|
09-03-12 08:54am
|
Comment
236
|
Classy Cams
(0)
|
|
09-03-12 07:52am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
For me, the face - specifically the eyes. Over and above any other body part, or how explicit a scene is, the sexiest thing is to see a lascivious look in a girl's eyes.
|
09-03-12 12:57am
|
Reply
238
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
^ what tangub said.
This site is on my radar; but not while I keep reading bad things about it :| (Would be happy to be proved wrong by other PUers or the webmaster...)
|
09-02-12 05:26pm
|
Reply
239
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Seeing as over 30 js regarded as mature (and I don't feel remotely mature!) I guess we have to go elsewhere for them - I'd be tempted to join Pure mature if there were more natural girls there.
Meantime, I'd be happy with more girls in the 22-30 range; there are a few more at Joymii and perhaps at Babes network.
|
09-02-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
240
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for the reply - didn't mean to lean so heavily on the regional pricing issue! As tangub and denner have noted, although they state £20, they do not seem to be following through on the CCBill page - so it's definitely worth a join.
|
09-02-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
"I think VOD sites are like the crack cocaine of online porn."
If VOD is the crack cocaine, I sudder to think what that makes cam sites? :)
|
09-02-12 06:03am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I said other because it depends on the user. Some folk don't want to keep porn on their computers or external drives, and only look at it occasionally - I suspect VOD sites still beat buying DVDs etc.
Although I wouldn't join, the fact they are in business suggests it's a model that works; as long as customers know the alternatives, and there is no deceit, I think the sites are OK...
|
09-02-12 06:02am
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd say frustrating. Some Japanese porn doesn't appeal to me at all - it seems to objectify the women (even?) more than much western porn.
But there is some material I like - and I do find the pixellation spoils it. I far prefer the slightly softer stuff that stops just short of showing the bits that need censoring - if it gets close enough, it's more exciting than just seeing the blur there.
|
08-30-12 07:49am
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
I said not sure - I would join of it was subtitled. If there is talking, I want to know what is being said - even if just to be amused rather than aroused by it!
|
08-28-12 08:22am
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To a point; I'll feel more comfortable if it's CCBill or Epoch. If it's something else, then it depends how unique the material is as to whether I'll chance it.
|
08-26-12 01:07am
|
Reply
246
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review, elephant - your findings are similar to mine, so I'm not sure what I can add in my forthcoming review :| But interesting that some of your cons are my pros and vice versa. Glad you liked the site!
|
08-25-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
247
|
Jason Strong Tickling
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I've seen a few straight tickling sites around too - to be honest, although quite amusing, it's lost on me a bit... but OTOH I'm glad there is room for such a relatively harmless and bizarre fetish :)
|
08-24-12 04:52am
|
Reply
248
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for another great review, tangub. This site has been vaguely on my radar, but I think I'd find the lack of delivery on the tease a bit frustrating. Having said that, I don't mind a lack of actual nudity - but in that case I'd prefer something a bit more erotic or evocative; the sets/lighting here seem a bit staged.
But nevertheless, this looks to be a great source of teasing, undressing, lingerie and nylons - all things I'm hugely fond of, so it will stay on my list!
On the regional pricing side - the UK increase seems to be very close to 20%, suggesting that, as a UK site, they seem to be charging VAT to UK customers. If this is the case, I wouldn't mind if they explained as such on the site!
|
08-24-12 02:18am
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
For some reason, bottom right seems the least obtrusive. But as long as it's subtle, I'm not too fussed.
|
08-24-12 02:09am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely important, but not essential. Actually, how essential depends on how the site is built. I've joined some sites which make it almost impossible to download pics, and then the absence of zips is a big deal. OTOH recently at W4B, their max-size pics are not offered in zips, but it's daftly easy to download them all with, er, DownThemAll. In such cases, lack of zips wouldn't bother me too much.
|
08-22-12 02:20am
|
