| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
201
|
Big Tit Porno
(0)
|
|
10-24-12 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends what you mean by password protected - my password is required to get into my computer, but the whole drive isn't encrypted. As something of a conspiracy theorist I'm tempted to do so... but also seen such drives become unrecoverable after encrypting so am on the fence.
I do have an encrypted partition for passwords and other sensitive stuff... but don't bother encrypting the external drive I keep my smut on.
|
10-16-12 07:51am
|
Reply
203
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
Sort of agree with GPL, but either way, thanks for the comment. I sort of had my eye on this site as I'm quite keen on the heartcore/whatever genre and something like Joymii or X-Art which featured models in their 30s or 40s would work really well for me. A shame, then, that this site - although purporting to be a bit more sensual - seems to be more run of the mill porn.
Also interesting that you were disappointed with orgasms.xxx - it's sort of on my list - any more specifics on what you didn't like? And/or what sites do you like in this genre?
|
10-16-12 07:22am
|
Reply
204
|
Gravure.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Agree - uncensored Japanese softcore is something of a rare item, so this site is worth watching. The photography seems good, and interesting; you liken it to Metart, but hopefully it will be a bit more erotic. First glance suggests the models are a bit too young-looking and the themes a bit too cutesy to be alluring to me; but I''m willing to be convinced!
|
10-15-12 08:44am
|
Comment
205
|
New Nude City
(0)
|
|
10-11-12 08:16am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Pretty much as Claypaws said - compared to other expenses that could be cut back on - or other forms of entertainment - joining a site I like is relatively frugal so it' hasn't affected me that much. That said, other aspects of life have kept me busy so I have been joining less sites than last year...
|
10-11-12 12:44am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If I find a good review, I'll check the user's profile out of interest... but I won't necessarily specifically look at their average site rating.
|
10-11-12 12:39am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It doesn't appeal to me, in porn or in real life. If it works for some folk - and both partners like it - then I can understand it being a fetish of sorts, but I'm baffled as to why it's so mainstream now. A casual observer would think it's the only way to do it!
|
10-05-12 11:12am
|
Reply
209
|
The Mosh Room
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Possibly - but it looks like it's done with a standard gallery script - piwigo - which may not have that functionality. This isn't a typical paysite as such, more a showcase of her work - but It's not a big deal as pics are easily fetched with a DM. I may suggest adding it though, if it's easy...
|
10-04-12 07:48am
|
Reply
210
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for a great review, tangub - I had noticed this site a couple of times and wondered what it was like.
I think you are right in that it is the same photographer as Breath Takers - Michael White (who also features in Met Art and Body In Mind, among others). I actually really like the style; the colours are natural, there is a good mix of models and usually some context which really works for me.
In this case it's good to know that it's on a par with Only Tease as to explicitness; I'd find this frustrating, and the schoolgirl theme doesn't really work for me either. At least though the theme justifies a separate site; I'm still baffled as to why Breath Takers, Girlfolio and Take5 Girls (back again) all run with overlaps in content...
|
10-04-12 07:03am
|
Reply
211
|
The Mosh Room
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Aha - sorry if I gave that impression. Photos make up the bulk of material here and are added fairly frequently - Mosh is mainly a photo model. Videos are fewer and tend to short clips.
|
10-03-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
About 30% or so - less than I used to but recently 'upgraded' to a smaller 256GB SSD - definitely worthwhile.
Also about 30% free on my external 1TB smut drive - I am hoping it will keep me going for the foreseeable future, so may have to prune it a bit...
|
10-03-12 12:43am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the price is lower, and the updates are frequent - eg daily - sure, I'd go for a longer membership...
|
10-02-12 04:24pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely - it suggests a long out of date site, that nobody is maintaining. Granted, if the content is good, a monthly membership still could be worth it; but usually there's no good tour on such sites, so no way of knowing.
|
09-28-12 12:40am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Best to pick your own (as with noses). At least I have a chance of remembering it; some sights assign a completely random username and password, meaning I have to go back to the joining email every time.
Of course how annoying that is depends on how long the site leaves you logged in - some do for your entire browser session which is fine; but eg Watch4Beauty has random username/password AND logs you out after a short time.
|
09-25-12 01:00am
|
Comment
216
|
Panty Flash Girls
(0)
|
|
09-25-12 12:58am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As many have said, the milder ones don't disgust me as such, but simply do nothing for me at all. And the more involved ones are definitely a turn-off...
|
09-24-12 12:20am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I do it very rarely - but on those occasions I take the external smut drive and plug it into the PS3.
|
09-21-12 01:44am
|
Reply
219
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thanks for the review here, and the info. I'm quite fond of this heartcore/whatever genre and this site cropped up on my radar - as you say, they are clearly aiming for the X-Art/Joymii market, both of which I enjoyed.
It's good to know it doesn't quite make it - helps prioritise other sites!
|
09-19-12 09:12am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What jberryl69 said :)
Actually, it depends. If it's the straight gonzo style, then that's pretty generic. If it's part of a scene, and we see both parties enjoying it, then it can work for me - and (not putting too fine a point on it) it is very analogous to what we, the viewer, might be doing - which can work too.
|
09-19-12 09:07am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Usually again for me; some are subtle, and realistic and hard to spot; alas they are the exception rather than the rule of large perfectly formed hemispheres jutting out...
|
09-17-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Pretty much what Tangub said - I'll keep stuff by website, and although I have seen the same model on the same site with different names, it's not something that's bothered me enough to have a policy on it. I guess if I did organise by another method it would be more likely photographer rather than model.
|
09-16-12 04:26pm
|
Reply
223
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for a great review. I'm a recent convert to this genre, but this has helped me priotitise this site a bit; much as I like creative photography and camerawork, it sounds like they've erred on the arty side a bit much here. Much as I enjoyed X Art, I'm a bit suspicious of any sites with Art in the name; it's good to add aesthetic value, but we're still here for porn!
Oh, and I'm glad it's not just me that recognises that, although beautiful, most of the 18-22 year old models need just a few more years before being genuinely sensual...
|
09-16-12 04:17pm
|
Reply
224
|
Manhandled.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
^ what tangub said. I've also joined both those sites without a problem.
|
09-14-12 12:19am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely. It won't make me join a site that I hadn't considered - but it will definitely push one up the list, and has done a number of times.
|
09-13-12 06:08am
|
