Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many of the best models from Met Art
Outstanding photography
Perfect settings and lighting
Sets are usually more revealing than Met Art
Good site layout and navigation
Videos are often not boring!
Models and sets are user-scored
Searchable tags
Cons:
Not a huge site, but larger than many
One update every 2-4 days (usually 2)
No tiered pricing for existing Met-Art network members
No other cons!
Bottom Line:
This site is a satellite in the Met Art universe that is exclusively presented by one of Met Art's best photographers, Arkisi. I can't find any profile information on Arkisi, but he/she is a very, very busy and talented person. The site includes many of the best models from Met Art in really excellent sets. Many of the videos are also excellent, which is often not the case elsewhere in the Met-Art world.
Overall, I'd say that this is 2nd or 3rd behind Met-Art in terms of best within the network.
Some basic stats:
About 720 sets (15 a month since 2014)
About 172 models
Sets range from about 35 to 120 images
Videos are about 6 to 22 minutes
Images come in three sizes 1k, 2k and 4k+
Videos come in several formats from 270p (why?) to full HD in MP4, WMV and Divx.
All sets are user scored and user tag searchable.
All sets are dated
The basic shell is very similar to Met-Art, including a user-options page that allows you to tailor your experience....except the option to open each image in a new page is not present.
The models here are every bit as amazing as they are over in Met-Art, but many models here are a little more...open. There are a few sets insertions and some other things like candle-play. Several videos start out showcase and end up masturbation. I actually joined this site because I wanted to see....um...a little more of a particular, exclusive model and, wow, I was not disappointed. Keep in mind, though, that this is strictly solo and some two-girl scenes. It is up a notch or two from Met-Art, but it is not at all hardcore.
In addition to the popular models, there are a few casting sets and a few sets with models I've never seen before. These might be girls that are popular elsewhere or girls that didn't stick around for one reason or another, I'm not sure.
I'm scoring this one an 90. The site is excellent overall, but isn't quite as large as most A sites. So it got that score based on the quality of material.
Bottom line. If you like Met-Art, do not hesitate to join this site. It is well worth the $20.
Hey, I was just reading this and wanted to mention that MPL Studios long ago resolved my issue and I am now a happy member there. I wrote a review of that site here on Porn Users.
I am an annual member on Met-Art and often join one or two of the other sites in their network or among their affiliates for a month or two. I've noticed that the prices will vary (i.e. $29 in most places, $19 in others) depending on where you look inside or outside of the network. Typically, though, The Porn Users site will have the best pricing other than the occasional $1-$5 teaser price for members of one site who never sign up for other sites. Personally, I think they should offer members long-term discounts to the other sites, especially the ones that don't update as often, but it is hard to blame them for not offering deep discounts given the perfection often found on their sites.
I've been trying to convince FemJoy that their smaller image sizes (800,1200, with 5500 as the large size) are incredibly antiquated.....for about 4 years, I've been trying....
These days I like 2000-3000 pixel images thanks to faster graphics cards that can display them quickly. I will save the best images I find in the largest available resolution, but only the top .05 (one-half of a) percent of what is out there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality VR videos
Young Attractive European models
Several resolutions available.
Navigation is straightforward
Images provided are representative of vids.
Cons:
Site is small (34 vids)
Navigation is extremely basic
Video download selection process is a little cumbersome.
50%+ of vids are observation only.
No release dates or schedule
No scoring
several formats, but they are not very consistent
Bottom Line:
OK, real quick....
RealJam is another start-up VR video provider based out of Budapest using Eastern European models. They are still pretty small, but so far they are doing things pretty well in terms of production.
RealJam Stats:
About 34 videos
About 18 models
Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive, smartphone.
Largest format for Vive/Oculus is about 3200x1800 but not all vids are that high.
Videos average about 10 minutes.
Largest format file sizes are about 2-2.5 gigs
(That is shorter and smaller than most)
Download speeds are good.
Overview:
When you log in, you get get a listing of videos with representative images and download options right on the listing page. There are 4 videos per page and there are currently 9 pages, so that's about 36 videos. Each model actually produces 2 or 3 videos. At least one is an observational strip show/masturbation video and the others are participatory. They don't always fall in sequence.
Sets are nicely done, high end with no real distractions...large homes or hotel suites. Lighting is generally good. There is almost always a kind of funky logo prop someplace visible in the room that Say's Real Jam with the sylized Ass made out of the L in Real and the J and Jam. Kind of clever.....kind of. That logo tells me these are all made by the crew and not brought in by an independent and purchased.
I find selecting a download format to be kind of clunky and have accidentally downloaded the wrong format more than once. For each video, there are 4 tabs across the top for the format (Gear, Oculus, Vive and Smartphone). Within each tab are the resolutions available for that format. Oculus and Vive are always the same and could easily be combined. What trips me up is that I think I hit the Vive tab and then hit the high-resolution format to download, then move on to look at the next set. It isn't until the file is downloaded that I realize I forgot to hit the Vive tab before downloading. The tab option is a reasonable approach, but there should be some way to see all or choose a default. Before I realized what I was doing wrong, I opened a Gear video thinking it was the best they had and was very disappointed.
Let's see....The models act pretty well and are directed well. There is a surprising amount of English dialog (monologue, really) with heavy eastern European accents. It doesn't detract from the videos any, though,...probably adds a little, especially since the dialog is generally pretty polite. You know, "You like?" and "You want to see?" kind of stuff.
The video releases are not dated, which I find a little frustrating. And as I mentioned, the resolution varies sometimes between videos.
Bottom line: For $20, go ahead and jump right in! It is well worth it for the collection of quality videos that they have.
As much as I like this site, I am a little disappointed that there are no long term membership options. The price structure is set up for monthly only, so that means I have to join two or three times a year to "load up" and then quit. I would gladly pay the typical 3-months membership fee to have this site all year. Oh well.
This is a tough one. Technically, it is all acting but I'm not watching a particular video to hear the guy throw slurs at the girl. That and endless exaggerated moaning are good reasons to just turn off the sound.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality light, often playful bondage videos
Wide variety of related fetishes as well
Photo sets included with most video sets
Popular European models and porn stars
Roughly 176 "sets"
Been around since 2005
Sets are dated.
Cons:
Very slow release schedule. 1 2-minute portion of a video set or a portion of a photo set every couple of days (6-8 minutes a week?)
Photo sets are broken up into multiple 20-30 image releases.
One image size per set (varies)
One video format (currently 1080p)
This is a "one-man operation" so the site lacks many typical features.
Very, very simple navigation
No search function
No scoring or ranking
Without a doubt the slowest downloads I have ever seen.
Bottom Line:
I'm not sure exactly what to make of this site. I really like some aspects of it, but it is a one-man operation for the most-part, so many elements are completely exasperating.
The images and videos are actually very good for this genre. The girls allow themselves to be tied up or appear to be unconscious at the beginning of each video. Once tied they then struggle a little (and I mean a tiny amount since their restraints are often loose) and then they are mechanically masturbated or dildoed by somebody else or they do it themselves with barely free hands. The models are pretty consistently clothed in stockings and heels or long boots, with lace body suits or something similar, sometimes crotchless, usually with panties. Many sets have models wearing latex dresses, skirts or body suits. I don't think the girls are completely nude in any set. The doms in these videos are either an unseen man or often another female model or porn star. Ashley Bulgari seems to be a little bit of a fixture in recent sets as either dom or sub. Lorena Garcia, the reason I joined the site, is the current model with about 10 sets. Girls include Eufrat, Monica Scott and many others.
The videos are high quality and reasonably well "acted". The girls are usually clearly enjoying things and there is no brutality or hard-forced orgasms. I see a consensual light neck-grab or two and a little light spanking, often with a flat-palm-touch warning to the model. There is no B/G sex at all, but a few of the lesbian scenes are pretty interesting. The videos and shoots are fairly modest with no close-ups, spreading, or things that I perceive the crew thinks would be interpreted as disrespectful to the models. Many of the vibrator close-ups, for example, are over panties. These are site standards since I've seen many of these models elsewhere doing some really open, revealing and close-up things. Still, the sets are more realistic than some of the totally fake bondage I've seen elsewhere, but this is all pretty much bedroom stuff that you would do to your significant other. Fun first, experimental second, limit testing, probably not at all.
Before you sign up, I have to tell you about the not-so-good stuff. First, the sets are broken up into multiple pieces. I personally hate that when it happens on a top-tier website, but I can understand why the webmaster here is doing it: If you only have one set every two weeks, people won't sign up. So, you get about 2 minutes of video every few days. Or you get about 30 images of a 90-180 image set. So that is a full photo/video set about every two-three weeks. Fortunately, they have been releasing the entire video at the end of the run for more recent videos, but you still have to go pull multiple videos to get an older set. And the photo sets are rarely combined so you will have to search through the set history to find the images. It makes me feel like I'm groveling for the goods and the Dom is doling them out to me....which, unfortunately, is true.
But the absolute worst part of the site is the slow download speed. It takes FOREVER to download files. 15 minutes for a single 200 meg file. That's just insanely slow compared to other sites. I think they need to upgrade their modems...
So, do I recommend this site? Well, yes, with reservations. For $25, you get a decent amount of high quality soft bondage material with popular models. But be prepared to spend a lot of time waiting for downloads and an eternity waiting for a complete set update. I joined for a month and will add it to my schedule to consider joining again when there are several more complete sets......in, what, January of 2020?
Go take a look if you like this type of stuff. The images and sample videos you find are representative of the content of the site.
Well, I have historically not been a big keeper of videos but I recently started keeping both "full experience" POV and high resolution VR videos. As a result, the collection is growing rather quickly now. I've also started culling/archiving all SD video and any images that are less than about 1600x1200 since they get blurry on larger monitors. It is amazing how some older sets that once were the best are now just barely OK because of image resolution and improvements in image quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Best video quality of any VR site
High-def (4K) 3D VR videos
Mostly Popular, very attractive European models
A few beautiful models I haven't seen elsewhere
Mostly participatory videos
These vids are VERY well directed. Girls that can be so-so elsewhere are AMAZING here.
Very high entertainment level: The girls are into the scenes.
Very fast download speeds
Good navigation
Release dates are posted
Videos are subscriber-scored on a 10 point scale.
Cons:
Still a pretty small site
Some videos are observational (i.e. watch b/g sex)
A few videos start participatory, but switch to observational.
No streaming or previews (minor for this format)
No zip files of photos or captures but a few representative images for each set (minor)
Tags listed with videos are not searchable.
A few girls make a little too much noise but a genuinely quiet compared to some other sites.
Bottom Line:
I just added a few points to the score because, after watching every single VR video on this site, I can honestly say they are ALL very good to excellent. The girls are beautiful, the sets/locations are spectacular and well thought out (several scenes even have a strategically placed mirror that gives you nice views when the girl is heads-down.), the direction is outstanding and the new vids since I've been a member have been killer. This is the very definition of VR porn. I don't say this lightly: BEST VR SITE ON THE INTERNET! OK, back to original review.
=============================
Yeah, this is pretty much what every VR site should emulate.
There are a couple of videos on this site that will absolutely blow you away. One, with Nancy A, is probably the best VR video I have seen so far on any site. She's a frequent model on Met Art and does sex scenes on a few sites, but she really shines here like nowhere else. A few other models are at their best here, too.
SexBabesVR Stats: (as of 2/1/17)
About 40 videos
26 models
Updates every 3 or 4 days
Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive low and high, and smartphone low and high
60 FPS typical
Highest resolution is 3840x1920
Typical video is about 23 minutes
Typical file size is about 5 gigs.
Videos include tags
3D Video format is Left/Right
Most videos start with the male prone, include a cowboy/reverse cowboy and end up with him in an upright missionary or doggie style with a pull-out or handjob money shot. Several sets includessome in-your-face views and all of them are good.
The sets are upscale and attractive but not distracting, the lighting is perfect, the models are nicely done but not overly done up, they are well directed and it looks like they are enjoying themselves. Conversation is minimal and the males in the scenes do not make any sound. Most sets open with music and a brief set-up of some sort. Some of these are surprisingly good and I found myself saying "Woa!" as I realized the ungodly gorgeous girl in front of me was about to virtually fuck me.
Lucky, lucky me!
Overall, the site and videos have the look and feel of Wow-girls but there is no affiliation to any other site that I can find and the domain owners are different. This is a well run, site, though, so I'm pretty sure somebody with other sites and a lot of resources is running it. Good for them, GREAT for those of us with VR gear.
Bottom line: although small, the quality here is among the best anywhere. This site is setting the bar. (I would score it higher, but it is still very small.) Go ahead and join for a month. it is totally worth it to see just how good high quality VR can be. I'll be back around at least annually....assuming I cancel, which I'm not sure I will do.
I was searching for a particular model on indexx.com and, after seeing her in a a few light bondage roles here, decided to join. There is a lot of good content here but the videos are released in 2-minute increments (i.e. 4 releases a week = 8 MINUTES of video a week and downloads are excrutiatingly slow (10 minutes for 45 MB???). I had a 4 GB VR file from a different site download faster. There is no functioning streaming option that I can find. Fortunately, they do release complete scenes once they are doled out in pieces, but of course they take FOREVER to download. I like the content here, but be prepared to wait around a LOT for downloads. In this age where I can get a new 20 minute video every day from other sites, I will withhold judgement on whether this $30 a month site is worth it until I see a little more.
I just joined this site and will try to write a review soon. It looks like it might be a WowGirls spin-off or something similar. Layout and color scheme is the same. About 40 videos, most are participatory. Video quality is the best VR I've seen so far. Really well done! The scene with Nancy A is so good I swear I can smell her.
On the list it is probably Piper Perri but if I can broaden the definition a little, my favorite petite nude model of all time is Lorena Garcia (Lorena B on Met Art) from Spain. She doesn't do B/G porn but has done a few things on other sites (like In-The-Crack) that could finish off any straight man.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Least expensive "VR" site on the net! ($9 a month!)(See below for why...)
Relatively large collection
Huge variety (B/G, G/G, BDSM, shemale, fetish
Full 360 degree videos
Many observational boy/girl sex scenes
File size are smaller because sets are short
The video player on the web page displays flat video. (because the videos themselves are not 3 D)
Cons:
Videos are 360 but NOT 3D! (i.e not 2 channel)
Video quality is not up to the standards of most other sites. (not a byproduct of the 360 view)
Most videos are not participatory
Many observational boy/girl sex scenes
Downloads are slow
File downloads are COMPRESSED in RAR format??!!
Sets are generally less than 10 minutes
The video player on the web page is a little slow.
No release dates or scoring
No index
odd 90 second pause when watching videos on site
Bottom Line:
This site has made it onto a few top 10 or top 20 VR website lists so I went to check it out. For $9 a month, how could I resist? .....$9 a month!!! The site is a collection of over 100 360 degree VR videos with a very wide variety of genres including solo, straight, lesbian, BDSM, etc. The down side is that the vast majority of the videos are NOT participatory, meaning you just watch and sometimes it is from a considerable distance.
Some specs:
120+ Videos
Videos are NOT 3D (only a single channel)
Most videos are high resolution
No dates or scoring
No models that I recognize (Alexa Nasha?)
When streaming, there is an odd 90 second pause before videos start playing. This is probably supposed to allow you to get set up with your VR in streaming mode, but if you are just wanting to see what the video is about, it is pretty annoying. It may also be some kind of process that turns the 360 degree video flat, but I'm not sure. I would MUCH prefer that the video start and just press pause if I'm streaming.
The lack of stereo 3D shooting is not immediately apparent with a headset on, but ultimately it is the downfall of these videos and probably this site. It IS possible to watch and enjoy these videos without 3D, but it is essentially like watching any flat video with your headset. This is why others say this site is not as immersive as some others.
The 360 view is interesting, but only a few videos really take advantage of it. Most of the time what is behind you is a wall or something else that you would expect to be behind you. A few videos have multiple girls masturbating or having sex with others in different corners, so you have to turn to face them.
Many of these videos seem to have been shot with a head mounted 360 rig. So the perspective is slightly higher than eye level and you can see the observers (your) body with a portion masked off with a graphic. The graphic is a little distracting, but I'm not sure what other options there would be.
The Download files are compressed in RAR format. In the several decades I've been downloading things, I've never seen that and actually had to pull out an old program to decompress the files. Once decompressed, the actual video is almost exactly the same size as the compressed file (because, of course, MP4 already compressed the file.) I'm not sure I understand why the webmasters do this since it doesn't really reduce download speed and is a royal pain in the ass to decompress.
Bottom line: The site is 360 but not 3D, which means it is not really a VR site...it is something....but slightly less than VR. Still for $9 a months, you are likely to find something here that interests you and that is a LOT less than many other sites with significantly less content.
I scored the site primarily based on the lack of 3D video. If these videos had been 3D, the site would have scored in the high 70s.
I was about to join this site when I realized this is an all-girls site that offers scenes where you observe masturbation or non-participatory lesbian sex only. Although that might be great for some, the whole idea behind VR is that it can be a visually participatory experience. For this site, apparently, you get to watch in VR. Also, $39.95 a month is pretty pricey for any site but waaaay up there for a small VR site. As a straight guy looking for VR sex, I don't think I'm the audience they are looking for.
Are we talking about watching a trailer to decide if we should download the video? The sites I subscribe to allow you to stream the entire video so I usually make my own trailer by skipping through the actual video. Once in a while I'll watch something on PornHub (or someplace like it)that ends up being a trailer, but not very often. In other words, I don't watch trailers.
Most mainstream Hollywood movies cast porn in such a negative light, completely ignoring the fact that literally half of the modern world watches it. So, my favorite is a movie that uses it as a backdrop but doesn't make any judgement at all. The movie is "Love, Actually". In one of the many tangled segments of this movie, Martin Freeman (The Hobbit, Sherlock) and Joanna Page (From Hell, several British television shows) play nude camera/lighting stand-ins for porn movies. Now, I don't think there are really many lighting stand-ins in porn, but that's OK. The entertainment lies in the fact that their personal relationship develops so normally and naively in-spite of their professional relationships. If you have only seen the broadcast TV version of this movie, you need to watch the DVD or HBO versions because they totally cut this segment for TV. The movie has more A and A-B list actors in it than pretty much any movie I've aver seen and most of the intertwined segments are very entertaining. Tell your SO it is a check flick if you have to. It is really a "couples" flick so watch it with somebody special. You are groaning, I'm sure, but the question was "favorite" not most accurate or most arousing, so that is my answer.
Let's see.... My second "car" in high school was a custom 1976 Dodge Maxi-van. (Look it up on Pinterest if you are not familiar. maxi-vans are almost 3 feet longer than the long-wheelbase versions.) I spent a ton of money and an entire summer getting it painted (complete with graphics and airbrushed murals) and building the custom interior complete with a kick-ass stereo, suede and leather captains chairs, 2 sun roofs, a 12 volt fridge and keg cooler, comfortable built-in love-seat along the side, a raised queen bed in the back and plenty of stash spots for...stuff. I lived in south Florida, it was the middle of the disco era, the drinking age was 18 and recreational drugs of all types were abundant. I owned a genuine party and fuck-truck. I often had to borrow my mom's car just long enough to pick up dates because nice girls' dads did not approve of boys with vans. It had a padded sliding door to conceal the bed in the back and I would use that to sneak 5 or 10 of my closest friends into drive-ins. (Monahan hated my kind, I'll bet...) But the best thing about it was that when that little door was closed, you could not tell that there was anyone inside when looking through the front windshield. Unlike most vans of the era, mine had a custom air suspension so it did not rock much when in use. So that bed saw a LOT of activity in some ridiculously public places. That is part of what made it so much fun.
The dean of students at the small private high school I attended hated that van and actually created a parking space he could see from his office specifically to keep an eye on it and me. He really hated it when I took a big group out to lunch at the local pub. Finally, he gave me an ultimatum: Either that van goes or he will make sure that I go. I took him at his word, so I sold my awesome van and ended up replacing it with a red 1976 Alfa Romeo convertible. Practically overnight I went from carrying a dozen friends around to only having room for one, or sometimes two very special passengers...but that is another chapter...
So, back to your question. I have seen some exceptionally hot solo photo sets in or on automobiles. Those seem pretty easy with the right car. Sex scenes are really difficult to shoot well because of the lack of room. Even sex in a convertible is a challenge if it isn't on the hood or across the trunk. Those inside a moving mini-van and "stranded/hitchhiker scenes are generally pretty lame and poorly shot. I can do without those. I did see one sex scene that took place in the back of a moving pick-up truck on CA state 101 south of Salinas, shot from a boom or something above the truck and from a semi driving along side that was hot as hell but that was a true rarity. for regular shoots, it is far more about the girl and the quality of the shoot than it is about the car.
A Christmas party is a great time to let loose a little, have a good time and enjoy the company of the people you work with that you might not otherwise relax with.
OK, I can appreciate that the genre may be a little different and that this may be a fetish, of sorts, but I wrote a review based on my observations, expectations, etc. I expected the scenes to be more engaging. Yes, the scenes are longer than 30 seconds, but that includes the long, long set-ups and the close-outs that are not action related. Yes, there are many different types of scenarios, but the idea that ALL of them are telling somebody how to masturbate, as in for the first time, is a little excessive. There are many, many similar scenes on dozens of sites that are more engaging and a few sites/porn stars do an absolutely spectacular job of dirty talking. Having a physically and visually disengaged girl telling me how to masturbate just doesn't do it for me. Far worse than a pity fuck, this is dozens of re-enactments of the 40 year old virgin with a leading female who isn't even remotely interested in the guy and often time belittles him. In the world of show and tell porn, this site is almost entirely just tell. I can appreciate the niche, but it does nothing for me.
Met Art and their related network is top notch in the solo model genre. I have to say that there should be and can easily be several categories corresponding to the major genres, plus newbies and "lifetime" awards. Be sure to invite me to the after-parties!
I hate to admit it, but I've been lurking around MFC and I know what you mean. There are a handful of girls who are basically naked all the time in the top couple of rows and they get money thrown at them, often without doing much of anything else. The new girls, who probably think in terms of a traditional one-on-one private experience, are at the very bottom of the list and when you peek into their rooms, they are just sitting there.
I also have to wonder if there is some Amazon.com-like marketing model where the models on the top row are paying extra to stay in those slots. That model works great for those top-row girls and for MFC, but not so much for the new models who aren't yet making enough money to buy a higher position. So they quit.
In the end, the psychology of it is very similar to stripping. Some girls try it, some girls enjoy the money for a while, but very few girls have the emotional fortitude or psychological make-up to stick with it and really excel.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
