From the site format, this might be a bait site.
Really small collection (23 videos)
Ultra basic navigation
Section called VR VOD where other vids are $10 each. Nice try. I'll wait for VR chat rooms.
No update schedule
Videos are not dated
Videos are not scored.
No search function
No model listing.
Bottom Line:
As VR sites go, this is a really small one, but the VR and actress quality is not bad.
This site is owned by the same group that owns Naughty America. That site includes VR but the actresses used are mature, established porn stars. From what I can tell, in an effort to generate more revenue, they separated out the "teen" VR from the mainstream stuff you can get at Naughty America and created this site. Kudos to those folks because people like me will join this site, even if it is only for a month....or for the few hours it takes to pull down every video on this site. What I really don't like, and am going to score accordingly for, is that the site creators went a little too far and created what appears to be a bait site. A bait site is a site designed to attract subscriptions with no clear intentions of maintaining the site beyond a certain point or providing ongoing, regular updates for the subscribers. Yes, this site has some good quality VR videos of young actresses, as advertised, but there is no clear indication of how often, if at all, the site is or has been updated and the site could very easily have just been created to suck money out of people looking for teen VR. A legitimate site lists release dates. A legitimate site provides regular updates. A legitimate site does not include a "store" selling 50 additional VR videos not shown on the site for $10 each. 50 additional VR videos! Ten...Dollars...Each!? And I'm not even counting the ubiquitous ads to join Naughty America with a single click. To be fair, these might all be oversights on the part of the webmasters, but they are huge, glaring, troubling oversights.
Real Teen VR Stats:
23 videos.
23 models (all single girl sets)
One fairly representative image per set
No zips or screencaps
Videos are not dated
No indication of new release frequency
Videos available in most VR formats.
File sizes are not listed.
These are actually pretty good VR videos. They are shot in the exact same style as the VR videos at Naughty America, probably because they are the same company and these videos were originally slated to go there. I did a review of the VR at Naughty America VR and many of those points apply here.
All videos are VR viewer participatory (i.e. you fuck her)
Most videos start (with you) prone and end up actively upright.
The Actresses are a little too talkative.
Some videos have drop-outs and/or abrupt transitions that hinder the VR experience.
The models are 18-19. Although youth is beauty in today's society, several of these girls are young but not beautiful.
Bottom line: Mixed. For $20, it is probably an acceptable site to visit for one month just to pull down the 23 videos. But the site appears to be a bait site designed specifically to get your money for those videos and never provide anything more.
If you are the webmaster for this site, feel free to prove me wrong by providing past release dates, upcoming release schedules and regular updates to the site. I will gladly change my review and score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Relatively large collection of VR porn
Many major US porn stars
Huge variety of girls
Generally good quality
You get the entire Naughty America site.
Cons:
Video direction could be better
Videos are not continuous (brief fades out and in)
Many of the actresses are..um..very mature.
Navigation for VR is really poor. There is a VR tab that shows the VR videos by date, popularoty or your favorites based on your scores, but you can't search just VR for a particular actress. You get all of her videos with no clear indicator that any videos are VR until you click on them individually. Somebody didn't think this through.
Bottom Line:
As always, I'm just laying out what I see and experience about a site with a minimal filter. I encourage you to share your experiences as well.
Amazingly, I had never joined Naughty America before joining them specifically for the VR porn. Fortunately, a subscription for one of their areas provides access to the entire network and I generally like what I see in the network. This review is just for the VR portion of the network.
Naughty America VR-specific Stats:
About 95 VR sets
I can't tell how many models there are because they are not broken out into VR only. Probably about 120.
One new set every 3 or 4 days.
Sets are dated and scored on a 5 star scale
One large zip collection of medium resolution images for each set including a strip from the actress (kind of a screen test set) and then images that match the video, possibly screen caps.
Format is side by side 180 degree with a fish-eye perspective. So far, they seem pretty consistent with good optics.
Wide variety of girls and settings here, the same girls that are in the regular Naughty America videos. Some are beautiful, many are a little older and some are much older (40 plus). I have a very hard time watching the more golden-age girls.
I joined this site as an add-on to another site called Real Teens VR, which is all sub-25 actresses. The two sites are affiliated with the young stuff going there and everything else landing here. It's about $$.
As far as I can tell, all of these videos are participatory sex videos or 3-ways. There are no videos where you just watch a girl get off like I've mentioned about a few other sites. I think that is a plus. The scenarios are very basic, which is also a plus. Friend of your girlfriend, best friends girlfriend, friend of your daughter, stepdaughter, stepsister, etc. The category "Your mom's hot friend" is the tip-off that it is an older actress. For the most part, the male surrogate (you) in these sets is silent. There is occasionally some grunting or groaning or talking, which is a little disturbing sometimes.
One thing that this site does a little differently is use multiple male positions in many of the VR sets. So they may start out with you (the male participant) sitting. Then you may be prone, naked and inactive. Then you are standing or kneeling on a bed thrusting away having active intercourse. It is much more of a traditional POV style. The active positions can be nice, but the transitions are instantaneous so you don't have a chance to prepare, mentally or otherwise. Ideally, there should be warning or the set-up should transition as part of the video. A few of the videos lead into the transition with the girl saying an appropriate thing like "OK, now I want you to fuck me doggie style", but most do not.
Actually, I feel like the VR sets here are a little over-produced and under directed. There is a billboard image for each set that reminds me of old VCR video covers, so somebody has the budget to make these, but the direction in some of the sets is marginal. I can sometimes see the girl looking at somebody and clearly being directed to do something differently. And the videos often "drop out" for a second as they splice in two non-contiguous takes or cut out some error. That drop out can be very distracting because often the position will change, clothes will vanish, or an initial insertion will be missing. The removal of clothing and an initial insertion are kind of porn video gold from my perspective. They should never be omitted from a video. In a few videos the drop-out literally happens every few seconds. It really ruins the whole VR vibe. You can do cut-away's all day long in a traditional porn video, but you can't do them at all in POV or VR. Apparently somebody doesn't know that.
Tech stuff.
After looking through the 100 or so VR videos from their representative "billboards" I pulled down the images and about 2 dozen high-resolution Oculus-Rift/Vive videos. Unfortunately, the high resolution vids stutter and pixelate on my Vive set-up, so I had to pull down the medium resolution versions. Those work well and I can hardly tell the difference in the videos. (I am in the process of building a much faster machine for VR and will test with that, but apparently the fastest AMD CPU chip made to date isn't fast enough...Which explains why Oculus only supports Intel CPUs.) In any case, the video files are HUGE and they take FOREVER to download. (My entire VR collection is about 200 videos so far and it already exceeds one terabyte.) Expect it to take 20-30 minutes to pull down several files.
I'm about out of space...
Bottom line: Decent site. Huge variety. Popular and sometimes older porn actresses. It is totally and completely worth it to join Naughty America VR for the handful of VR sets you will like and the bucket-loads of POV and other regular video material that comes with it. But my rating is for the VR portion on
Got an HTC Vive a few weeks ago. It is impossible to describe how impressive it is for gaming and...other things. I have written a few VR site reviews and will write a few more soon. From a technology perspective, VR is like having a camera on a cell phone. You have no idea that you even need it until you have one and start using it.
I visited this site a couple of months ago on an intro offer from Met-Art. The site is very small and includes masturbation videos of many of the girls you see on Met-Art. These are a little more interesting than the videos found on Met-Art, but not much. If you like the girls on Met-Art and can't find them doing harder stuff on other sites, then this might be a good place to find them.
Very good question. The vast majority of sites don't update frequently enough to warrant a continuous subscription, but I do have annual subscriptions to a few sites that have one or more updates a day. The annual rate, especially when a special is offered, are often equal to 3 months or so and if I'm going to rejoin a site more than once or twice a year, I'll consider it. Right now I have 4 or 5 annual subscriptions....and waaaay to many monthly ones.
I download a lot of stuff and watch it once or twice before moving on to the next download. Sometimes I'll go back to look at old stuff and am pleasantly surprised when I find something good that I either downloaded and didn't watch or forgot about. I probably don't go through and get rid of old stuff often enough. As a result, I have several terabytes of video....
I currently have...5 annual subscriptions and I usually have 1 or 2 monthly ones that I change regularly. I bookmark them and go through them in a particular order. Once in a while, I will start with a video I downloaded during a previous session but didn't watch.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Wide variety of VR porn types
Very large collection for this genre
Generally very good quality
Huge mix of actresses/actors here
At least a few major porn stars
Excellent navigation, sort and search functions
New video every couple of days
Unique "position" icon on each video shows whether you should be standing, sitting up, laying back or flat on your back to watch the video. (Very nice feature!)
The site remembers what type of VR you have so you don't have to select from a list for each download. (Nice!)
A few of the upskirt/face sitting scenes will, ah, take your breath away.
Cons:
Many scenes don't really take advantage of VR
(i.e. some scenes are across the room)
Huge mix of actresses/actors here.
Girls are generally more mature.
Videos are not quite as polished
Bottom Line:
Disclaimer: My goal here is to compare VR sites and to explain particular VR things that a site does well or not so well. As always, my objective is to share my experience. If your experience is different, you are welcome to share yours too!
=======================
HoloGirlsVR is large for a VR site. But to be this large, it has perhaps made a few sacrifices in quality meaning you have to sift to find really good stuff that appeals to you.
HoloGirlsVR Stats:
105 Videos
74 models
Models appear to be popular US, Canadian and European porn stars.
Most girls are in more than 1 video
One new set every 3 or 4 days
Release dates are listed
Each set is rated on a 5 star scale
Frame rates are not listed
File sizes are not listed
I'll use an analogy the webmaster may not like, but it is what comes to mind. Men's Warehouse. Now there is some pretty schlocky stuff at Men's Warehouse, but if you are willing to sift through enough stuff, you will probably find something you like. Conversely, Men's Warehouse sells a LOT of stuff, so SOMEBODY must like what they are selling,even the schlocky stuff. So this site is the Men's Warehouse of VR porn. Something for everybody. If that's what the webmasters are going for, they are killing it!
One of the ways that the site tries to categorize things is by defining niches or collections. Nice job on that! There are several niches/collections that really lend themselves to the VR genre, and a few that don't. The face-sitting series is a great example of what VR porn can do. These girls stick their junk just beyond your tongue's reach above your face and I guarantee you will groan in approval when you experience a good example of it. However, one of the drawbacks of HD is that you might not really want to see some of these girls that close in good light. Keep looking, though, there will be a few that you like. It's OK to groan. Really. Slightly more tame is the upskirt category. This takes the porn upskirt genre to a higher level because you are laying prone under the girl involved as she stands directly over your head. Depending on the set, there is a broad range of views here from white panties (that get pulled aside) to complete nudity. This can be awesome if you find the right girl. Find her.
Other collections include the Mistress T collection, which is a whole dom series where YOU are the submissive (not my thing but, hey, some folks love it.) and the GFE (Girlfriend Experience, I think) collection, which is generally a younger girl talking to you, masturbating and occasionally fucking you. There's an only girls collection that let's you watch two or more (up to about 8, I think) girls getting each other or themselves off. There are also a lot of uncategorized videos in a range of activities. I recall foot fetish sets and stocking sets and a LOT of girls covered with tattoos. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it is not something I'm used to. Sorry to bring this up, but something else I noticed was that several of the males in the sex videos were black. Seriously, Kudos to the site management for appealing to that potentially lucrative "blacked" porn market segment, but I'm a straight white guy who cannot get used to the idea of enjoying a VR segment with a hot girl when I look down and my junk is black. Again...men's warehouse. Something for everybody. Cool.
With the larger variety of videos comes a wider range of talent. I'm not sure how to define this other than some scenes are seriously over acted. A few of the girls seem to never shut up. I'm not sure if this is just the girls or if it is actually scripted this way. Again, different tastes....but less is usually better in this case.
The sets are generally nice, shot in homes or hotel rooms. The lighting is good but the masking for the VR is a little annoying when you notice it. They have blocked out anything that might distract you from the scene in front of you, which is more distracting than if they had left it.
File sizes are not listed but they are pretty big! Vive/Oculus files are a gig to 2 gigs each. Oddly, the high-res generic files are 2-4 gigs each. Download speeds are pretty slow.
File types:
Android 5.0+
Gear VR
Oculus (High and Low)
Iphone/Android pre 5.0
Generic H.264
Tech stuff
Update: I now have a dedicated VR computer with a very fast processor and video card. All o fthe Oculus/Vive files play fine.
...personally, although there are a few amazing sets on this site, I am a little disappointed. Why? Because many of the sets are watch others have sex sets rather than the fully immersive ME having sex sets. This completely defeats the opportunity available in VR.
Overall, this is a great site to visit because of some of the unique sets you can find here, but I'm not sure how long it will be before I come bac
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality VR
Very consistent
Multiple downloadable formats
Many popular US porn stars
Decent navigation
All vids are dated and scored
File sizes are listed
Cons:
Site is still a little small
Highest bit rate files don't work well on underpowered PCs.
(but other formats do and I can't really tell)
You can't sort vids by score or model. (Everything is in reverse chronological order.)
Models are not in alphabetical order (also reverse chronological order)
There are only a few representative images for the sets and no zip files. I get that images seem counter to the technology, but you can't really tell what goes on in a VR video without them.
Bottom Line:
My viewing tools expanded recently and now includes an HTC Vive. If/when you buy one of these, be prepared to lock yourself in a room to binge a little on the relatively indescribable experience of VR porn. Remember to eat.
That said, I joined 3 sites in search of quality VR porn and of those three, BadoinkVR is the best for my tastes, which is full-on straight sex.
You can't rate these the same way as a "flat" porn site because the tech is new and there just isn't that much media out there...yet. So I'm going to score these a little differently, comparing them to each other rather than to a traditional site.
BadoinkVR stats:
About 90 sets
About 90 models (some sets have multiple girls)
So far most models only have one set.
Models are mostly popular US porn stars with a few young eastern Europeans in the mix.
1 New set each week.
Each set is dated and scored on a 10 point scale
The scoring is pretty honest, maybe a bit lower than it should be.
The frame rate is either 30 or 60 frames per second. Most are 60, which is terrific.
File sizes are listed
(Update: I recently built a new desktop computer that is dedicated to Vive VR use. On that machine, all of the High-res Oculus/Vive VR files from this site work perfectly.)
Nearly all of these videos are 180 degree with side-by-side 3D. (This is nice because you can set your player once and not have to change it when the video format changes.) Most are shot with a person's body (AKA you) in the foreground laying on his (your) back. There may be a portion of a scene where you are standing (i.e. getting a BJ or ramming a girl from the rear who is also standing or doggy on a the edge of a bed). Typical POV-like stuff. If you line everything up right, you can be 20 again with a buff porn-dude bod. The males in these scenes never make a sound, which is terrific and correct for the scenario. (You WILL hear a male voice while watching these, but it will be your own.) The thought that I was really watching somebody else fuck that girl truly never entered my mind...in other words, the video crew did it right.
The sets are typically very nice...most are in nice homes or buildings...but not too distracting. The lighting has to be perfect for these things and it is. The acting is pretty decent and the scripts are not embarrassing. Overall, the quality of the sets and the videos is impressive. I swear I could feel breath on my face a few times and caught a whiff of stripper perfume once or twice as well. Funny how the mind works.
The vast majority of these sets include full-on sex but some are just VR masturbation scenes. Whoever runs this site knows what they are doing. There is a solo masturbation/toy scene with Tori Black, who is a world-class sexy-talk teaser. Also, there are one or two straight sex scene from a woman's POV and a few scenes with other couples. (Most notable is a 360 degree scene from 2015 with August Ames and 2 other couples. Yes, August ends up riding you.) Some scenes have an extra girl or an extra guy that the girl you are screwing is messing around with. A few scenes are two girls getting each other off. Noticeably absent from this site so far are any two girl scenes with one girl on your dick and the other on your face. I'm sure they will have that here eventually...
Formats include:
Mobile LQ
Mobile HQ
Vive/Oculus
Gear VR
Playstation VR
(Some of these files are the same, but they spell it out by device to make choosing easier)
These files are HUGE so expect it to take some time to download. A 25 minute video ranges in size from about 2 gigs for low-res mobile to about 5.5 gigs for high-res Oculus/Vive files. Overall, though, download speeds are not too bad considering the size of these things.
Tech stuff:
I have been having trouble getting the Steam-based Whirlygig or Virtual Desktop players to work correctly for my Vive, so I've been using Simple VR and downloading the High def mobile videos instead of the "Vive/Oculus" videos. The high-def mobile vids work fine. Video compression is good and there is no stuttering, although there is some pixelation when I fast forward too much. One minute there's a beautiful girl bouncing on my dick and the next minute it is a block character from Minecraft. Woa! Pressing pause seems to fix it. (My very-fast AMD Opteron gaming rig is only about 2 years old but I had to buy a new 8-gig Radeon RX480 video card to support VR. The card is a little buggy and might be the issue.)
Bottom line: If you have a VR set-up and are into straight-sex, this is a "must join" site for at least a month. The site is well-run and what they lack in quantity, they more than make up for in quality.
Drooler makes an excellent point. There are usually only a few things in a scene that interest me and a few that are totally deflating. Sadly, very few videos have more than a few minutes of the things I really like so I often find myself fast forwarding to the good stuff. I wonder if there has ever been a study on the formula for this....
Ummm. I came of age in South Florida in the early 80's when picking up girls in bars was a fairly common thing....so were drugs. (But Penicillin cured everything.) I woke up more than time in a bed in a strange house next to a girl I didn't recognize. Once there was nobody home and just a "Thanks! Let yourself out." note! If I ever saw that girl again, I wouldn't know it.
Cable stuff is even cheesier than regular porn! (Is that possible?) Once in a great while I will watch Co-ed Confidential just to watch Michelle Maylene in softcore.
Eh. I don't often have all day to watch porn. My typical window is about 30 minutes and that includes time for finding and downloading whatever it is you are going to watch this time or next. (I'll submit a poll question or two about that....) The anticipation factor builds up while you search the internet for today's content, so a 10 minute video is fine.
I have several email accounts on several different domains but access them through the same client software. The account I use for PU and related personal recreation is a catch-all that I also use for on-line purchases, and "give us your email to get into our site" retail sites. It gets about 70 emails a day that are mostly spam and mostly filtered. Of course, with the opportunity to win a gift card on occasion, I would never filter out PU. :-)
I'm with Drooler on this one. I worked in retail long enough to know that Black Friday is not when store prices are lowest. It is when the store companies want you to shop. Now, if you have kids and need to get the latest toys and are worried they will sell out, OK, go for it. But items for adults will be cheaper later. I do about 97% of my shopping on-line and have not been in a mall in several months. If I visit one before Christmas, it will be after 9:00 at night when the mall is open but most people are at home.
I'm sure most here know that getting a hard-on is sometimes a reflex mechanism when you have the urge to pee. Morning wood is a good example of this. But there is also kind of a tail-wagging-the-dog thing that makes men more likely to get erections just before they actually sense that they need to pee. For me, that is when I have gotten a raging hard-on in public. Many years ago I did end up dating one girl from work who noticed when this happened. She was a very pretty girl, but was still flattered that somebody actually had a hard-on for her. I never told her it was probably just because we were in a long meeting and I had to pee.
The question is highly context sensitive. Typical 18 year old girls think any male over the age of 35 and/or not pushing a stroller around is a dirty old man. But (for me anyway) any woman between the ages of maybe 35 and 45 who implies that I'm a dirty old man (or equivalent) is probably flirting.
Every choice has consequences, good or bad. On a scale of 1 to 10, my biggest regrets rate about a 3, with maybe one or two 4s. Let's see. Investing in tech stocks in the late '90s. Not selling off fast enough in 2008. Those are things I could have done that would have had a positive impact on me and my family.
On a slightly different note, I am now living life specifically with the idea of avoiding regrets in the future. I will not regret not travelling because I'm doing it. I will not regret not having a classic convertible because I bought one. I may regret doing those things when I'm 90 and broke, but not now. Refer to first sentence.
From a practical perspective, I think most men are visually oriented...certainly our little group here is. So the idea of using one of these things first-hand is counter to our nature.
Thanks for the info. I tried POVlive a couple times and that seems like a pretty straightforward buy a chatroom site. Also tried the Met Art live site, metcams. Metcams was a decent site, but they kept telling me my account had been hacked and cutting me off. I think many of these sites are all run by the same parent company/master website, but I can't think of the name.
Sadly, Real Beluga Caviar has been illegal in the US since 2005 due to over fishing the Russian Sturgeon fish that provide it.
I'll gladly join you for some flank steak though! Flank and skirt steaks are getting harder to find in the US because so many restaurants use them to make fajitas.
So I'll settle for a nice Filet and a baked potato.
This site has grown pretty significantly (200 videos) and the network has matured also. I rejoined this site and then added the $69 option to join all of the network sites and there is a ton of good content here. Lubed and Tiny4K are also good. I wrote a review about Tiny4K that is a more current impression.
We're talking scenes where a supposed husband allows/watches some other guy fuck his wife? Well, no, that doesn't really interest me at all.
Thinking about this a little more, as a straight guy, I don't really like any porn scenes with more guys in it than girls. Guys are usually the surrogate me in the scene, so two guys doesn't work.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good quality videos
Decent sized collection
Dates back to 2007
Almost entirely young (under 20), petite, slender attractive models (no unibrows, etc....some eastern block teeth, though.)
Several popular European models from when they were younger
Most models are shaved but a few are trimmed or full.
Every update is dated
"Bonus" videos from other sites like Wet and Puffy
Cons:
The site IS updating, but only one small addition once a week.
When updates occurred before, they were once or twice a week but were very small. one video segment from a larger set, just screen caps, just photos, etc.
A few choice photo sets, like one of Caprice, have broken links.
Some MPG/WMV videos are actually avi. No idea why.
No scoring of videos or sets.
No ability to tag favorites.
Downloads are very slow.
The price ($29.95 USD) seems a little steep for the content, but not outrageous.
Bottom Line:
This is another "18" site
Mostly solo but some girl/girl sets
Stripping, masturbation, penetration, some speculum, some peeing, some panty stuffing.
The name says it all. Some serious close-ups of mostly really cute, young models!
The site video content is very similar to InTheCrack.com (ITC) and it also reminded me a little bit of ALSScan.com (ALS) or First Time Videos (FTV). ITC does a lot of close-ups and ALS is almost entirely teen models. FTV is another site similar to this one except this one is almost entirely indoor shooting. The collection here is nowhere near as large as those sites, but it is larger than many other similarly priced but lower quality sites
The girls are all eastern European and several have been on other sites over the years. Caprice and several others will be easily recognized, although some have different names here. There are also many that I don't recognize from other sites. Most are quite pretty and many have that "cute" factor that is solid gold for teen sites. Sadly, as is the case with many semi-pro eastern European models, their expressions can be a little off by American standards...a little goofy, frightened or spooky. Fortunately, the majority of the videos are not focused on faces at all.
At first I thought the site had stopped updating. I think that was because navigation for the site is a little tricky. The Videos page shows recent updates but the Photos page shows mid 2015 as the most recent update. And the upate log page has not been updated since 2015. Some udpates can only be found by scrolling down on the "home" page. The page only shows 6 sets from mid-october back to September, so anything that might have been here between September of this year and July of 2015 might not be showing up anywhere. They are not updating in the update log, in models, etc. Updates are occurring about once a week and they are single videos of a larger model set, or images, or bonus content. Honestly, this is one of the most confusing sites I've seen when it comes to finding stuff.
Some quick stats:
126 models or female couples
About 725 video segments
About 25 20 meg photo sessions (1333x2000)
Screencaps for most videos
Sets date back to 2007
There is an update log (through July of 2015)
Everything is dated.
Videos come in multiple formats, usually 3 sizes. Unfortunately the format of the files is often incorrect (MP4 instead of WMV, AVI instead of MP4, etc.) The sizes are usually correct, though.
Downloads are slow. Very slow.
Navigation is pretty basic. You can view by update or by model or you can view the update page or look at the update log to see all updates through mid-2015. I have no idea why they continue to post updates on the home page, but do not add them to the log or update model info. Something is kind of messed up with that.
There is a search function, sort of, but it allows you to search by a specific attribute or video activity like anal, boobs, cervix, discharge, finger, gape, etc. Kind of odd, but it does seem to work, at least with newer videos.
One thing I like is that all of the videos include a little synopsis of what goes on in them....similar to ITC but without the check marks for the best videos.
Also, the file names seem to make sense. Girls name and segment number.
There are about 21 bonus videos from Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy and Nubiles.net. These are full length videos, not just teasers.
Bottom line: I'm giving this site a 77 because a) it has some really good solo girl content, but b) navigation is very basic and links are broken or mislabeled, c) the webmaster is not posting/cross referencing updates correctly, and d) downloads are very slow.
If you like "InTheCrack.com" but also have a preference for the younger models, this site might be worth a visit. Take a look at the models and know that none of them are the least bit shy.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
