I just joined this site for the first time and initially it looked like there are no updates since 2015. How does that happen? Well, the webmasters are posting updates on the updates page, but they are not updating their update log page or model info. So it looks like the site is not updating until you scroll down on the specific updates page.
Earliest sets are from 2007 and there are quite a few videos and photo sets of some popular Eastern European models from years past. I'll try to write a review later.
Feedback to the webmasters? Not really. I send feedback to the customer service email address or web form, usually when something is wrong. My ratings for a site are often influenced by the responses I get from that communication.
I also add comments to sets that have a comment section on sites like Femjoy or Met art. If a set is really nice, I'll tell the photographer in the comments. However, if the set has issues, I'm not shy about commenting on that either. Bad focus, graininess and bad lighting are peeves that I usually comment on. It's never right to be a dick about things, but people need to know when something is wrong with a site or set.
This depends on many factors, but it is always nice to see the model in a few images where she is fully clothed. As LPee23 said, some models are really good at peekabo, etc., to create some added excitement.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looks like there are about 1500 videos
Videos date back to 2004
Good quality streaming videos
Many popular US porn stars here. Many!
Some of the videos are quite good
All videos are dated
Cons:
Videos are STREAMING ONLY
Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH.
Navigation is pretty basic
Navigation is frustratingly slow
Scenarios can be a little monotonous.
Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud.
Bottom Line:
Not sure what to say about this site....
I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.)
I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing).
But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something.
There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems.
Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But...
The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room...
The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress.
There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough.
My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed.
I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch.
The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like?
OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep.
Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it.
I joined this site and instead of finding girls ready to go to private chats, I find kind of a carnival of spin games and similar antics. Most of the girls are clothed or partially nude, mostly just talking or chatting with their viewers. Guys are throwing tokens at them and there is NOTHING HAPPENING... The girls sell things like snapchats and videos and have posted lists for things like flashing and other activities. It really seems like this site is set up to sort of milk money from viewers who are very hard pressed to "make friends" with the girls. There are a few active "shows" and lesbian things going on, but it doesn't really seem that exciting. What am I missing here?
That's a good point. There is something oddly nostalgic and somewhat comforting about going back to your old material. I tossed nearly all of my magazines and will probably never see those 1980's models again.
Kind of a funny question. Years ago a girlfriend found my porn stash and we ended up watching it and fucking for two solid days. Another girlfriend stole some of my magazines and videos when we broke up (supposedly she took a drawer full of stuff when she moved out and didn't notice the porn in the bottom. It was my bedside drawer....hmmm ). A few weeks later, she returned it and wanted to get back together. The "started watching it" might be a viable choice if the survey were posted on some religious psychology site, maybe. I will admit that it is a vice but must add that it is one of the most stress-reducing activities I can think of. So all that is left is "pay too much for it". Well....I look at it this way. I spend about the same in six months on-line as I would in one night in a really good strip club. And I can't keep going back to the strip club again for free!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Large collection (Over 400 scenes)
All college aged models
Mostly attractive models
Mostly exclusive models
Access to a couple of other sites with similar themes.
Cons:
Photo images sizes are small
Identical format for each video can be monotonous.
Seems like one guy just recording his conquests...
Navigation is very basic
Bottom Line:
I apologize, but I cancelled my membership here before I had a chance to collect stats and do a review. Here's is what I do have.
This is obviously a "college-girls paying for tuition" site, real of fake, I can't tell. The videographer/blurred out male star of the scenes travels to different colleges and records his meeting with, conversing with, squeezing, fingering, often jamming a sex-toy into and ultimately fucking and then coming all over the young, relatively attractive girl in each scene. Being relatively attractive is kind of easy when you are in the most admired demographic on the planet (18-22 female), but a few of these girls are truly beautiful. There are many scenes, although only the recent ones are in HD (720p) and the oldest ones are an unwatchable resolution like 640x480.
The newer scenes alternate between POV and fixed camera off to the side. Some of the POV and POV-like (i.e. camera at foot of bed recording a reverse cowboy) material is quite good, but much of it is jittery and the field of POV view is limited.
Some of the scenes have a split video (POV and from another angle) which I personally dislike a lot. I do not recall any issues downloading the videos or zip files. Images are small, like 1200-1400 pixels on the wide-side small.
The network includes a "casting couch" site, and a "broke model" site. Both of these sites followed a similar, narrow scenario which made me immediately fast-forward in search of the good stuff. There was also a site called "net video girls" which just seemed like a lot of unrelated amateur nude-model stuff thrown together like a slightly pornographic subreddit.
Bottom Line: There are a lot of sites that use this format but this one is as good as any of the others that I've seen, perhaps a little better. So if you like the format, you have nothing to lose by signing up for a month...well...except for $25 if you really hate the site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has been part of the ever-expanding Met-Art Network for many years. (i.e. high quality)
1 exclusive set a day since 2005 (over 3600 sets, easily 100,000 images)
Models are usually beautiful and popular
Sets are very well done.
Many sets are as good as the best Met Art sets.
Models might be a little more revealing here than on Met Art.
Cons:
It seems as though the The site has become sort of a spill-over from Met-Art where archived shoots or perhaps extra shots from a set are packaged and displayed.
Many sets are models we will never see again (because they only did one or two shoots and then quit.)
Navigation, though good, is not quite as good as Met-Art.
Bottom Line:
I published a review of Errotica Archives in 2012 and rated it among the top soft core photography sites on the Internet. That review expired so I thought I would refresh it with my impressions from the 6 or so times I have joined the site since then. It is still up there among the best nude photography sites on the Internet, but I can't rate it as high as I did in 2012.
The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. Many of the models you know and love were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With over 12 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. All but the newest European models have sets here. All of them!
Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I STILL wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network sites..)
All set come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution. Everything is available in zip files and downloading is relatively fast.
The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photographers. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind showcasing their assets with close-ups.
There is a new set every day. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set but these are not re-releases, just archive or perhaps extra images from a different set. All sets are clearly dated.
Just a reminder that this is a softcore site. There are a few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude modeling site.
Met-Art links all of their sites together so, for example, you can see links to sets on other sites for a model you are looking at, but each site requires its own membership and associated fee, so the links can be frustrating at times. Once in a while they will allow access to a site on the network for free for a limited time but generally, you have to pay for access to each site. There is a pull-down menu that allows you to jump between sites in the network that you are a member of.
So....what about this site isn't as good as it used to be? Well, I think it might be two or three things. First, this is clearly a site for surplus or archived sets (hence the name). Some of these sets were archived because they were not quite suitable for Met Art. Either something didn't click with the set or, on the other hand, maybe there are too many close-ups! (Not really a problem for me...). But there seem to be more of these B-grade sets than there used to be. Second, there are also a lot of slightly less impressive one-hit wonders in the mix. Occasionally, there will be an introduction set for a new model on Met Art. Then maybe there will be one more set on Met Art, then some time later a third set will show up here. This is because the model only did a few sets and then quit, but there are sets on the shelf. And sometimes....these models were not A-list models to begin with.
In fact, that is the third reason the site doesn't rank as high this time around. Global supply. In 2010-2012, there was this bevy of incredibly beautiful women in eastern Europe that were shooting for the Met-Art, FemJoy and a few other networks. It was a bumper crop of OMFG women! Now, there are still many, many incredibly beautiful women within the Met-Art network, but to produce the kind of volume this network needs to provide 15-20 new sets or videos a day, there has to be a constant flow of new and consistent talent. Personally, I think that talent is becoming harder and harder to find and the result is a higher proportion of sets with unpolished or less attractive women. This is probably pervasive with all of the sites that use Eastern European models and it explains why some photographers are heading to Brazil and central America more often. I'll leave it at that but I'm sure you get the point. The supply, relative to demand, seems to be dwindling. (and I'll bet the popular models are getting more expensive.)
OK, where was I... In spite of my opinion that the site is not quite as good as it was in 2012, it is still an outstanding site! If you like Met-Art, Femjoy or similar sites, you will love this one. And considering the volume of material, it is still an excellent deal.
Interesting find. I'm guessing that my new review just superseded my old one and that everybody can only have one review of a site. So if you search by site, you only see one review. If you search by user, you see both.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation still not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Bottom Line:
I noticed my review of this site expired and there are no current reviews, so I'm updating my old review. Very little has changed since 2014 except the number of sets has gone up a lot.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open and the site seems to e getting a little more explicit than it was in the early days. No problem with that!
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 4000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views of great looking models.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
So..what's not to like? Well...there are STILL a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best.
First, the navigation is still a little off. There are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. You have to click "back to gallery" or pageback to return to the gallery page. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving because you will inevitably close an image and end up exiting the set. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I was told they were working on this in 2014. Apparently, they lied.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, showy, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure
Cons:
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...)
Bottom Line:
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site.
Down blouse. Here's the logic.
To me, this question is about voyeurism and the typical and eternal male associated desire to see the shape of a woman's breasts. It is primal. Whether you realize it or not, you look at a fully clothed woman's chest, in spite of not actually being able to see anything, to get an idea of the size and shape of her boobs. It is some kind of natural selection thing. And the thrill, since puberty, is to be able to do that without the girl noticing. Upskirts are a totally different category and not a practical voyeur activity. Nipslips are not really a voyeuristic thing at all, just a person at the right place at the right time. Sideboob and underboob can be voyeuristic, but for those, the girl is proobably already trying to be revealing. The downblouse is the mother of all opportunities to check out the shape of a female breast with the potential for her not to realize you are looking.
I think it is funny that the fashion industry has developed push-up bras that actually make breasts harder to see, but they have made it acceptable to wear G-strings to avoid panty lines, all while making women far more uncomfortable then they were in the bra-less, white cotton bikini underwear 70's. How dumb is that?
I think "Any computer game" is kind of a cop out. There are computer games to play when idle, like on a flight, games to play when you want to be social and games to play when you want to play a good game. And there are SO many good iPad/tablet games...my favorite changes just about monthly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality videos and images
Great variety
Reasonable download speeds
Many pornstars and models you've heard of
Sets have dates added
Cons:
Alot of non-exclusive content
Some "teaser" scenes from other sites
Navigation can be circular at times
No counts or easy way to see how often updates occur.
"in-network" sites don't have much content.
Bottom Line:
Whoever owns this site probably really is a porn mastermind. He managed to talk several other sites into giving him content for referral. Unlike a few other sites that I've really complained about, this one is pretty clear about the source of their content and the list of other sites that some of the content comes from is pretty impressive. The only thing I can't figure out completely is which sites are part of THIS network and which sites are referrals.
So, here goes:
The sites that look like they are in-network, meaning you get all of the content, includes:
NewgirlPOV.com: This site has maybe 25 video sets. The girls are attractive and the sets are well done. Some good POV stuff here.
Fuckedhard18.com/massagegirls18.com: This is two sites, but the sets seem almost interchangable. Several popular porn models in this mix. Massagegirls18 has about 218 videos dating back to 2009. Some good stuff here, too. Fuckedhard18 also has over 200 videos but it appears that some overlap with the other site.
All of these sets can be watched or downloaded either complete or in smaller pieces. Most are in HD. All of these sets for these two sites start out on a massage table. The girls get oiled up and fucked.
The next site is called fuckedhardGFs.com. This is a collection of videos in many different locations and scenarios. Lots of popular porn stars here. Some good, some just OK. Looks like about 96 videos here.
Next is a site called Epicsex.com. Similar to the site above, but more of the "white room" style shooting. Not bad. About 45 videos here.
The last site that appears to be in the network is called bangable.com This is a solo model video site that is totally softcore, kind of playboy-esque. There are a few nice models here, but nothing special going on.
I suggest you check out pornmastermind.com for a month both for the videos in the network and for access to samples from several other sites that you might not otherwise know about.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Over 268,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
There have also been occasions lately where one or two models dominate the daily sets. Great if you like the model(s)...
Bottom Line:
Hegre-art.com is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicities, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can find not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...no fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc. The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are, according to the site, over 268,000 images in 4332 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your room with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very nice high quality HD videos
Generally very nice looking models
Good lighting and sets
A few minutes of awesome close-up or POV footage in nearly every scene
Navigation is simple and functional
Nice layout
Mostly US models that sometimes talk a little
Considerable variety of "petite" girls.
Model Interaction/eye contact with camera is generally very good.
Part of a larger network that is mostly excellent.
All videos are dated.
Cons:
Many links to other sites you have to pay to access.
Infrequent updates for this site (1 a week)
Inconsistent access and download speeds
You have to pay for full access to the rest of the network.
Bottom Line:
I'm not sure it is fair to talk about just this site when it is part of a larger network, so I'll talk a little about both. First the site:
Tiny-4K has a growing collection of very good quality HD videos. Currently, there are about 280 videos that range from 25 to 45 minutes each. These are near-POV or POV style and there are almost always a few minutes of really excellent footage in each video. There is a wide variety of petite models and most, I think, are from the US. Dialogues are in English. Each video is scored (i.e. 9.1) and ranked (1st, 2nd, etc.) so getting to the best videos is pretty easy. Models are rated also and there is a directory. The ratings seem to be pretty genuine...although after seeing them in action, I would probably give one or two models an 11 if I could. Model interaction with the camera is very good. Even when they are getting seriously slammed or are working hard bouncing on some guys dick, they still seem to be having a good time most of the time.
Site Navigation is basic but functional and intuitive. You can save favorites and search.
But this is only half the story. This site is actually part of a network, but you don't have full access to the rest of the network. Instead, you occasionally get to watch some of the other-site videos and maybe download that content, but you don't have access to the other sites, just to a few videos from those sites. Models are cross listed so you can see where else they are, but you might not be able to get to them....typical marketing tease that I'm almost used to these days.
The other sites in the network include Tiny4K, POVD, Casting Couch X, Exotic 4K, Fantasy HD, Holed, Lubed, My very first time, Passion HD, POVD and Pure Mature. All of these sites use the same basic format and share the same overall look, feel and quality of videos, but the niches are slightly different. Again, these sites are NOT INCLUDED in your Tiny-4K membership, but you do get access to some of the videos.
I have joined several of the other sites on different occasions and the quality and quantity at those sites is improving, too. Each of the sites now has hundreds of videos, except the brand-new anal site Holed, which has about 30, and Lubed, which has about 60. POVD now has nearly 400 videos. Passion HD, the most mainstream of the sites, appears to have over 1700 HD videos now, dating back to 2011. That's pretty impressive.
Currently, if you join one site in the network, there is a ONE TIME fee of $69 to gain access to all of the other sites. You will have access to the other sites for as long as you keep your original membership. So technically, you could join one site for a month, then pay the $69 to see if you like the other sites. If you do, then upgrade to an annual membership for that original site and keep access to all of the sites in the network. Personally, after finding myself drawn back to a couple of sites in this network, I ended up doing just that.
Once you throw the entire network into the mix, there is quite a bit of content here, including at least one new video within the network just about every day.
These sites are video sites so the images are secondary and mostly just from the video shoot. Some are screen-caps but it seems that there is often somebody taking pictures as well and many of those images are not bad.
Download times seem a little slower than average and downloads time out occasionally. I can't tell if this is due to a download limit or something else.
The videos themselves are generally very good and all are 720, 1080p or 4k. The 4K videos can only be downloaded if you join a higher tier in the network.
Bottom line? The Tiny4K site has grown to become a very good site in it's own right, but you really need to experience some of the other sites in the network, either one site at a time or with the one-time $69 hit, to get everything. There is a lot of really good content on the network in several niches. Some are truly OMG videos that make it totally worth it to visit.
Similar to Rearadmiral. Right now I have about 8 memberships, I think. 4 annual ones, a couple of 2-3-times-a-year memberships and several to sites I have not joined before that I was curious about. Normally, it is 3 annual and 1-2 others at a time.
I have a hard time watching TV these days because everything is so contrived. The newer US comedies are pretty dumb and the serious stuff is easy to guess the formula or keep a move or two ahead of the plot (or cops). So if I have to watch TV, I'll watch BBC America, which, believe it or not, has a few unique shows on it that either follow a different formula or put the US in a less nationalistic perspective. Even the comedy is sometimes better (Graham Norton is probably the best talk show on TV because of the multi-guest dialog and because the actor-guests often get drunk!) ..or I will watch stuff on.....the Sci-Fi channel. If I am going to throw all reality out the window to watch some stupid american show where they don't know not to walk down dark, occupied alleys or how to use cell phones, then I may as well throw all reality out the window and watch something where everybody is in space or far in the future. Hard to say "That's dumb" to a sci-fi show since it is all 100% fake to begin with.
Yeah, the idea of a non-porn but very porn-like movie is a little oxymoronic to me. There are some movies with good scenes in them, yes, or movies with hot, popular female actors that get naked in them, yes, but it is hard to pick a best, so here's a list of..um...memorable scenes. Let's start with Sin City. The girl you want to see naked, Jessica Alba, isn't. But the other nude scenes, including ultra-hot Carla Gugino, in this movie are really excellent even if they aren't sex scenes. Dead Calm features a very, very young Nicole Kidman in a scene that is pretty good even if it isn't fully nude. In the Wrestler, there is a strip club scene with Marisa Tomei that stands out. The sex scene with Eva Green in 300: Rise of an Empire is not bad (She's had a few interesting scenes in movies.). Heck, even Risky Business has a pretty good scene in it with Rebecca De Mornay and Tom Cruise. ....so no top movie. Lot's of good scenes that I would watch a movie again for, though. Thank god for Tivo!
I see a lot of pretty good promo videos for "mysislovesme.com", where the horny stepsister gets laid. They look interesting because the girls in the promos are hot and the interaction with the camera is almost POV. There is some pretty good dialog, too.
Here's my test of a good video. First, turn off the sound. Now watch the first half of the video. If you have a hard-on at that point, go ahead and watch the rest with the sound on. The "taboo" premise is never as important as a videos ability to grab you.
After realizing I usually have a membership to one of the sites on this network, I went ahead and bought the upgrade for permanent access to the entire network for $69. Unfortunately, the upgrade does not provide me with the ability download many of the top rated set videos or images, just watch them...not really what I signed up for. I tried contacting thier tech support about this, but got no response back from anybody.
I'll follow up and let you know if it ever gets resolved.
Follow-Up - 10-18-16:
The limited download option has been resolved somehow. I can now download any video within the network.
The first full frontal nude centerfold in Playboy was Marilyn Cole, Miss February 1972. This magazine vanished from my older brother's porn stash and formed the foundation or mine.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
