Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Decent quality videos
All seem to be in HD
Several download options
Some attractive girls
Cons:
60 TOTAL videos (August 2016)
Site is extremely slow
No preview photos
Can't view photos, just download them.
Teaser photo rarely reflects the scene
Scenes are so contrived as to be laughable
No model listings
No search
ONE New set every week or two
Bottom Line:
I'm just going to try to write a quick one for this site because, frankly, that's all there is to write about.
60 scenes.
Each scene has a screenshot photo set
Extremely slow navigation
No model credits or search
60 sets.
The only reason this site exists is because it advertises as a "punishment" site. It isn't really a punishment site and isn't really a "play" punishment site because the scenes are not set up to depict playful punishment or any kind of real bondage. The images they use for the teasers are rarely representative of the sets. That teaser advertising video you see every place where the girl is getting abused by a bunch of guys? It is in fast motion and I can't seem to find it on the site.
60 sets.
What I was hoping for was some kind of bedroom bondage or playful punishment site. This is neither because it tries to be much more serious than it is. The images show girls tied up in what could be fun for both partners. Then the videos makes it out like the girl is being punished for writing about another guy or doing something that the guy didn't like. But throughout the scene the girl isn't tied down and clearly has to be in control of things to have sex. She looks like she's upset, but it is usually pretty bad acting. In the meantime, the guy is yelling at her like he's teaching her some kind of lesson. Lame.
60 sets.
There are a couple of sets that look pretty interesting at first, like a wax-play set where the girl is tied down and looks like she is enjoying herself. He leaves her hands tied to the bed and gives it to her, then there is a fairly ordinary, not particularly memorable traditional sex scene...well, except that they guy is fairly aggressive...like he is in most sets. I remember that.
Perhaps this is the most compelling argument why you might want to skip this site. The highest member-rated score on the entire site is 95%. Only 8 of the scenes on the site rank 90% or higher. Translation: a lot of people who paid to join the site do not believe the material is first rate....because it isn't.
The guys who run this site and/or direct these sets seem to be trying pretty hard to make this work and they aren't doing a bad job considering the limited resources they must have. But in this day of kink.com and hogtied dominating the BDSM scene, they need to adjust either their name or their format a little to avoid misleading a lot of users. It looks like they've tried several different things in an effort to find a niche, but they have not really found it yet.
Bottom line: You might like this site if you like the fake interview sites or other fake B&D sites. The price is cheap, but there are some slightly better sites in this genre.
I have some really old some from college. Things like the "Oh god, she's nude!" Vanessa Williams Penthouse. It is stored in the bottom of a box someplace and once in a while I stumble upon it, look through it, wonder what to do with it, put it back and forget about it again until the next time.
You should probably talk about anything OTHER than shop. In fact, let them take the conversation wherever they want to.
I met Raquel Darrian at a non-porn related party in LA hosted by the Major Video rental chain (they rented a lot of porn videos before they were purchased by blockbuster...this was about 1992, I think). Her then-boyfriend Derrick was with her. Although I knew who they were, I went out of my way not to talk shop with them, partially because this was not a porn industry event, it was a video industry event. Funny thing...I ran into her about a year later in a Fort Lauderdale strip club and she remembered me...not my name, but she remembered where we met before. She was headlining there that night and one of my vendors had brought me to this club. Derrick was with her, and they sat at my table for a while so they could stay on the floor without having to work it. Again, we talked about anything but shop.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
All sets are dates
No recycled material
Site goes back to 2005 and sets got to 2001
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Great value!
No advertising!is generally very good.
Cons:
Navigation could be a bit better in some areas.
Sets are are on multiple pages
Bottom Line:
Every once in a great while, you stumble over something that you should have known about but somehow didn't. Like finding that great restaurant that has been in your neighborhood for years. That's the way I felt when I stumbled onto this site. Wow! What a great collection! How is it possible that I didn't know about this? No idea, but I do now and I can tell you that there is something about it that I really like.
OK, here's the scoop.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art. Although it is European style, I think the photographer and most of the models are American or at least English speaking.
Currently releasing a set a day.
Been around since about 2005 or so. Sets date back to 2001.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets.
I can't tell exactly how many photo sets there are, but it looks like there are about 400 sets and maybe 80 videos.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good. In general, these videos seem more interesting than the average met-art video, possibly because there is audio. Watching the photo shoot videos is interesting because the photographer is often in the video so you can see an hear how the photographer and model interact. This isn't necessarily something to get off to, but it makes you part of the shoot.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. No amateur shoots here but the sets are...not quite as glamour-oriented as Met-art perhaps...this may be because the color saturation is more realistic here than it is there. Colors are generally great.
The models come in all shapes, sizes and ethnicities. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full but (thankfully) none of that totally unkept could-never-wear-a-bikini stuff you sometimes see at other sites.
These models seem all natural and un-enhanced.
Popular models here include Connie Carter, Nessa and Gisele. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites.
You won't find a single apple, grape, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude.
The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
Model interaction with the photographer is generally excellent. Watching the photo shoot videos with sound confirms this. It adds a nice quality to the shoots.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is generally very good. You can search on model name or keyword. Personally, I really dislike having to page through an individual set, though. There are only 12 images on a set-page and many sets have 4 or 5 pages. That is painful, frustrating and no longer needed except to reduce the load on servers.
Download speed is good and I never had a fail. I do not use a Download Manager, but on occasion had 3 or 4 downloads running at once. This didn't break anything.
About the only thing I am not fond of in this site is the large number of black and white photo sets. even a few of the videos are in black and white. I get that it adds drama and is the photographers prerogative. I just prefer realism and true-to-life detail. On the other hand, the black and white sets completely remove any preconceptions that an observer might have about, say, a darker skinned model. Eliminating the color allows one to see just how beautiful a model really is. Nice touch.
Bottom line: If you are into nude photography and enjoy sites like Met-Art, Femjoy, MPL Studios or Hegre-Art, you owe it to yourself to try this place. For $14.99 a month, it may be one of the best bargains on the internet.
I have annual subscriptions to 3 of my favorite sites and have had them for a couple of years now. I still poke around and subscribe to other sites, but not as much as I used to. Those three sites each provide multiple daily updates and that keeps me fairly satisfied.
I understand where you are coming from, but I don't think you can compare softcore modeling or even European porn to mainstream US porn. Very few models make the transition to hardcore easily because the traits needed for the two are different. Those who do make the transition may simply be starting in softcore with a plan to move on as they gain popularity. Also, European and some american nude models make a shitload of money, probably as much as or more than US porn stars do. Sidney Moon started with Playboy, made a lot of money modeling and was able to retire without going into porn videos (although she did a couple of girl/girl videos back in the Danni's Hotbox days.) Marketa Belonoha never did a single porn or girl/girl scene, often had two shootings a day and retired fairly wealthy in her early 30s.
There are a lot of European models that have done what I'll call European porn but will probably never progress beyond sex with their real life boyfriends on-screen. Connie Carter, often seen in Met-Art is a good example of that. There are also a lot of softcore models that are lesbians and won't do boy/girl sex scenes. This gets back to the traits thing I spoke of earlier. (i.e. Sydney, I think.)
So, my point is that nobody HAS to progress to freaky porn to be successful. There are plenty of very, very successful nude models that don't and plenty of their followers who appreciate it.
There are many girls in this industry that know exactly how to manage their careers, but there are also a lot of girls who have no idea what they are getting into. It seems like many of the girls make the decisions about what to do, but it also seems like in some cases others make the decisions for them. My point is that I'm not sure if the start easy and get progressively more hard core is a planned thing, or if the girl just progresses from nude modeling to porn acting to progressively nastier stuff because those around her are telling her that's what she needs to be doing.
I am NOT saying that this is an exploitation thing, but it is interesting how the pattern so closely mimics exploitation that you often would not be able to tell if it was or not.
Personally, I am not into the really freak stuff. I like the model sites and straight porn with a POV perspective...a little bondage occasionally. Anal, DP and brutality are huge turn-offs to me...probably because I could never do those things in the bedroom and would never want to treat a woman that way. (Seriously, have you ever had a long term relationship with a woman who likes Anal? Do you know any woman that truly likes it? Porn is not about getting off, it is about getting YOU off.) So I don't want my favorite porn girls to be doing too much of the truly freaky stuff...ever!
Most porn stars make truly awful noises during sex, foreign or not, so the volume is off when I watch them. There are a few exceptions when the girl is talking to the camera, but not many.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few recent videos are pretty good
Layout is OK
Navigation is straightforward (28 pages, 24 videos per page) and consistent.
Choose your own PW and it can be saved for future logins. (There is a very easy captcha at login.)
Cons:
One new video per week
Seems like a lot of 3rd party stuff
Many more recent Japanese videos are Pixelated
Only HD since about 2013
All HD videos are 720p
Videos are average quality
Many videos are non-nude
No photos
Only one video format per set
Older videos do not stream and must be downloaded
No video details
No model details
No search
Many, many broken videos in the bonus sites
Nobody seems to be enjoying themselves.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site because the previews show very flexible, relatively fit looking women, which happens to be a niche I like a lot. But the site was a pretty big disappointment as the updates are only weekly and the video quality is generally pretty bad. There are a few pretty good videos, but you really, really have to look for them.
Here are some stats:
Site has been open since 2004.
1 update a week
672 videos.
NO images.
HD videos began in 2013 (about 150)
About 60 HD videos (2013-present) are Japanese and pixelated due to Japanese porn laws.
The models are a mixed bag of mostly eastern Europeans with some western girls and the aforementioned Japanese videos. There are very few memorable/savable girls in the entire collection, which took me about an hour to go through. This is the only site where "flexible" does not always equate to fit. I now know that even the plumpest girls can lift their legs over their heads. That's not something I ever really wanted to know...or see.
Each video provides just two options: Watch or download. The older videos will not play in Chrome or IE11 and MUST be downloaded, which means you will be downloading, watching and deleting a lot of videos. Fortunately, they only take a few seconds to download because they are small. A large number of bonus videos are broken and
The video sets are broken down into 3 or 4 videos/segments for each shooting of each model. So, since they release one new video a week, it takes a month to get one complete video shoot.
Sometimes they are sequential, sometimes not.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this site is that although the girls are flexible, and a few are even attractive, the video and choreography is so poorly done that it really feels like a couple of horny middle school kids filmed their older brother's girlfriend. The videos are are not stable, not framed well, not focused and rarely positioned in an appropriate way. The girls rarely look at the camera, rarely pause in open positions and only a few recent videos actually provide an unobstructed view of things while the girls are flexing. Most of the sets have a video of the girl flexing while clothed, flexing while partially clothed, flexing naked from the side or back (not showy), then BAM some guy shows up and, without the slightest hesitation of foreplay, starts fucking them. The sex is not particularly good and the girls are either clearly not enjoying it or making faces that are the worst porn orgasm faces on the planet. These videos could have been so much better! All they needed to do was slow down, let the girls enjoy themselves a little and showcase the natural talent from rarely seen angles for a few minutes.
Before I forget, the site uses a couple of different charge providers. Make sure you get one you trust like Epoch as it is easy to cancel through them. I tried to cancel through the cancel page on the website and they were unable to find my account. Fortunately, I found it immediately on the epoch site and cancelled it there.
Now, to be fair, the site advertises free access to a bunch of other sites in their network, which is called "Extreme Movie Pass". I found these sites, at least the ones I ventured into, to be about the same or a little worse than Amateur18. These sites have names like EXGF Sexxx, Crazy Monster Cock, Crazy Beauties, Crazy Old Moms, Big Breast, Asian Hot Bunnies, Rubber Babes, Nylon Worlds (sic), Extreme Tranny Movies and many more. One, called Flexidolls.com, is both interesting and creepy. Each video starts with a guy taking a girl out of a box, a suitcase or a closet like she is one of those real girl dolls. He then poses her in an impossible looking position and immediately proceeds to do something to her with a dildo or his dick. The entire time, the girl has a totally blank expression and is staring into space because, you know, she's supposed to be a doll. I recall that most credit card servicers will not allow site videos to simulate drugging a woman in any way. These are as close to a "play with an unconscious girl" videos as they can get away with, I guess. Meh....
In general, all of the other sites are mostly standard def and fair-to-poor videos. Many videos are broken.
Bottom line: At $30 a month, this site is not really worth it when you compare it to all of the other top-quality sites out there. It might be worth it for a month at $20, though. with all of the bizarre other sites that comes with it, there might be something you like but there almost certainly will not be much of it and you will have to sift through a lot of junk. Be careful about cross-checks when you sign up and be sure to use a known service provider. I've put about three hours into looking at ALL of the content on this site and most of the network sites that look interesting. I will almost certainly never be back.
If you look around enough, you will see almost every porn actress or model out there in both girl-girl and girl-guy scenes. So they may have a sexual preference, but it does not impact their ability to have sex with whoever the scene calls for. I do think that the industry tends to have a lot of bi girls.
Depends on the porn star. Some, like Savannah (Shannon Wilsey) from the late 80's-early 90's, have particularly graphic and unfortunate stories leading up to their deaths or suicides. Knowing the stories tends to shrivel one's enthusiasm. But if they had long, successful, relatively happy careers and died of something unrelated, then here's to remembering them in the best possible way!
Porn Awards....kind of an oxymoron. Porn is privately watched by many, but, at least here in the hypocritical US, publicly shunned. (It's OK to shoot somebody on TV, but you can't see a boob because that would be porn!) How stupid and unhealthy. The value of the award is high within the industry, I suppose, but outside the industry, what, there are awards?? Because of this, it has to be because the fans, who will nearly always remain nameless, really appreciate or enjoy the work or the look or the unique talent that a porn model or porn star has. This is the weirdest industry on the planet....but I do see an opportunity for an independent, poll based industry award...THE PORN USER AWARDS!
I signed up for naked gymnast and was surprised to see watermarks that said flexyteen. So I went to Flexyteen and was able to log in with me NG account info. EXACT same site! The only difference was the text across the top of the 1999 web page. I would have been really pissed if I had signed up for both. See my review under Naked Gymnast.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Some videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
No model pages.
Bottom Line:
I saw a couple of sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. I went ahead and did this in spite of there being no reviews for the site. here on PU. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log along the left side that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com instead of naked-gymnast. On a hunch, I went to Flexyteens.com, which has a very nice looking front entrance, and signed in my Naked-Gymnast login. Surprise! I got the exact same site, except at the top it now said "Flexy Teens"! So I will be dropping this review there also. I would be so pissed if I had signed up for the same site under two different names. Fortunately, I did not.
The models are typically young, but there is a general lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are just strange, neither gymnastic nor flexy. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but this site is not worth visiting by itself.
Yes, for most sites I only sign up for a month at a time, but I have annual subscriptions to a few. You are right about some sets not being that exciting, but I like the format because you can truly see what each model looks like without any stupid props, covered tattoos, airbrushing or clothing designed to hide things. Every single model is real and most are stunning. It isn't up in your face stuff very often and is mostly pretty soft core, but once a week or so there is a set that knocks my...um...socks off.
I just followed the link to this site and am wondering what is wrong with this site;s webmasters. My first clue is that nearly all of the "top models" are from 2010 and before. Then when I clicked on model of the month, January and February 2016 are blank...then when I clicked on "all models of the month", it shows 2009, 2010 and then skips to an all-blank 2016. 5 years missing? And links to "more about this model" are broken. This is on the model teaser page? Really? This is not the type of thing that inspires me to join.
I just signed up again with a $75 annual subscription. This is one of 4 or 5 soft-core modeling sites that are always worth getting a long term subscription to.
So all this time I've been thinking In the Crack was an ANAL site! I'm not really into that, so I stayed away. Wow was I wrong. The name of the site should really be In your Face because there are a lot of terrific, popular US and European models spreading lips and getting within a few inches of the camera. There is some anal, but the videos are broken up in a way that provides the view of your choice.
Yes, it is a video site, but generally there is one image set per video. Yes, the images could be larger. Yes, there are some odd download issues occasionally. But there is a TON of material here. Absolutely worth your $
We're talking turn-offs in porn, right? Well, big tits and big dicks bring big egos, right? Lack of intelligence...don't know many PhDs in porn (although I do know one or two) and don't care. It ain't Shakespeare. Aggression..can't really have submissiveness without it. So that leaves poor hygiene....which is totally true about porn...everybody needs to be super clean....except for that part where somebody either licks or sticks their dick in somebody else's asshole. Yea, hygiene....except apparently anal is OK.
I recall one summer vacation to Emerald isle when I had sex with my now-wife in all of those places on the same day..oh..and the back yard was the beach.
Scenes? This reminds me of the proverbial center of a tootsie-pop question. (Apologies to those who don't know the Tootsie-pop owl.) When previewing potential downloads, I might scan through a couple of dozen scenes in a sitting, download the ones I like and then watch them later. Once downloaded, if they are mediocre scenes, I will fast-forward/skip through them and occasionally just delete them. If they are really, really good scenes, I will, um, be done with them before they are over. So from my perspective, the ideal answer is one because it is frigging awesome, but occasionally it is a few.
T4K is part of a collection of sites that include Passion HD, Fantasy HD and POVD. It is NOT a one-pass, though and there are separate subscriptions to each site. I vaguely recall a "special" that I think was $69.00 a month for all of them. See my review on POVD, which I think is the most interesting of these sites.
The T4K angle is a gimmick to get people into this collection of sites. All of this material really belongsonthe other sites in the network, but the owners decided to increase shelf-space instead of improving the quality of their other sites. But unfortunately, the majority of updates to this collection of sites is here at T4K. BTW, None of the images on the marketing page are actually part of a video. None. Those amazing spreads of every model are nowhere to be found on the site and some of the videos are actually on sister sites. So don't go thinking based on the imaging that this is a POV site with a lot of scenes. It isn't. There are a few POV scenes or partial POV scenes, but most of it is shot from an observers perspective. (This type of window-dressing to get you into the site is common in this network.) I will say that much of the video is very good, though, as long as you turn the sound down so you don't hear the overly animated moans and squeaks. And a few of the videos are downright excellent.
The most annoying thing about this site is that they show you thumbnails to lots of scenes that are only available on the other sites, most of which you have to pay for. Sometimes they will throw you a bone and let you see something from another site for free, but the goal for the webmaster is to get you to sign up for two or three other sites that, given the small volume of this site and some of the other sites, should really be free.
It is worth visiting, but don't get sucked into paying for the rest of the network.
Great review and you cover all the bases perfectly. I just saw your review because T4K was just scored and I had joined a few months ago.
I'll drop a little update into comments.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
