Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
Updated site goes back to 2007
If you like Black and white sets, there are a lot here.
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Good download speeds.
Cons:
Navigation is awful.
Sets are are on multiple pages
Sets are no longer dated except when paging through update history.
Looks like some sets are either recycled or older.
Some sets are very small.
If you don't like black and white sets, there are way too many here.
Bottom Line:
In a prior review, I listed this site as a pleasant surprise and gave it one of my highest scores. Sadly, a few things have changed, including the standards of the other top sites, while Morey Studio has remained more-or-less the same and in some ways declined. The quality of the work is still excellent and most of the models are beautiful, but the halo is gone.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art.
Release count has dropped to a set every other day or so.
Sets now only go back to about 2007. (before it was 2001)
About 325 models.
About 1250 sets.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets. But I have to warn you, a LOT of the models are just glam-style with very conservative sets.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites but there are several popular models, especially in the older sets. You won't find a single apple, grape, watermelon, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude. The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well. Sets, lighting and Colors are generally great.
There are a LOT of black and white (B&W) sets. I understand the artistic concept behind B&W images, but there is a major flaw here because a lot of the harder scenes are in B&W. A girl/girl set or a set with dildo masturbation is pretty much intended to get the viewer off. Converting it to black and white does not make it art, it just makes it a dissappointing set. Many other sites include B&W white images in their otherwise color sets but here, entire sets, sometimes all sets for a particular model, are B&W.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is Poor-to-OK. The site has changed a little since the last time I was here, I think, and it is not up to par with the other top softcore sites. I also noticed that some sections of the site are inconsistent with others.
You can search on model name or set keyword.
When you do that, one set comes up "highlighted" and you have to then open that set, or you can open other, thumbnail sets that are related. Navigation is single-threaded so you have to deliberately open things in new tabs if you don't want to spend half your time paging back.
Sets are laid out with 12 images to a page and multiple pages. If you get to a set from the updates page, it takes you to the set page and you have to click again to open it. Some sets are pretty small and some shoots are pretty clearly broken up into smaller sets. There are also several sets from the "private collection" which translates into unreleased sets taken years ago. They are usually good sets, but there is probably a reason why they were not released in 2010 when shot, and it reduces the amount of new model material on the site.
Sets are no longer dated on the set page itself, which is weird and deliberate. It opens up the likelyhood of recycling old sets. The only way to see dates is to scroll backwards through the incredibly clunky updates pages. There is no year/month index to take you to a date. You have to scroll past 100+ sets to the bottom of each update page and click "previous updates" to
get to the early sets.
Model pages are also a little..off. If a model only has one set, all of the other slots on the model page fill with other models. This makes it very difficult to see how many sets a model has. Very odd approach.
Another thing I noticed is that several very popular models from years ago are here, but they only have one set. And of course, you don't find this out until you join and go to the model page. That seems marginally deceptive. Ther was one model that I saw in a preview shot that I never found on the site. No idea why.
Bottom line: Although this site has lost a little of its previous luster, it still has a ton of excellent solo-model and girl/girl softcore material. For $14.99 for the first month and 9.99 a month after that, it is a very good deal, but be prepared to do a LOT of browsing.
Thanks for the review! I checked my archive and see I last joined this site in 2009 and have images back to 2006, so the site has been around a while. Back then the models were European and American, the shoots were done in more of a "glam" style and the images and video were comparable to Twisty's or One-girl-a-day. It is interesting how that recent "russian" factor is so unpopular with western Europeans and Americans. When I joined a similar site with a lot of unknown Czech models, they all had neon eye shadow. Some girls can pull-off the fun clown-clothing clothing look just like some can-pull-off (I guess that was a pun...) the school-girl uniform look, but most can't. I'll put this on my list and look for discounted rates. 9 years of material should keep me entertained for a while....
Not life, just one or two sites. As you know, most of my reviews are quite positive and I really do try to give sites a 2nd chance by rejoining when a bad experience may have been a fluke.
I would suggest Irish Creme but since you are lactose intolerant, maybe some warm brandy? It's not eggnog but you won't notice after a while... :-)
I got another "please come back" offer today for, get this, $7.95 a month. The teaser shows a new site called "brutalPOV" which looks like an interesting concept of POV bondage sex. So I went to the site. Entered all my info and clicked Join only to be presented with a new page that shows the monthly rate at $39.95!!!!! If you get this offer and you have been a member before, it looks like the only way to actually cash in on it is to use a different browser and different email address...maybe. That's what I had to do last time. Fetish Network...where the biggesst fetish is fucking over the customers. If I decide to run the gauntlet and sign up again, I'll update my review.
Also, it looks like the link in PU for $9.95 is broken.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality material
Beautiful, natural, mostly very young models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
All European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Overall quality and update frequency has declined somewhat in the last 6 months.
No consistency in release timing or between videos and image sets.
Only one set a week lately and 3 of 4 November releases were videos.
Overall site quality is not as good as it once was.
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Model names are not consistent with the rest of the Met Art network.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to go a littel Jeckyl and Hyde in this review. Bear with me.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 1000 photo sets
About 260 videos
About 200 models
1 update a week but prior to 2018, there were 4 updates a week.
The site has been around since 2013
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Stunning 18 is one of the satellite web sites in eh Met Art network established, I think, for the photographer Antonio Clemens.
This is the third or fourth time I've joined this site and I have to say I'm pretty disappointed since the last time I joined. Apparently, Antonio Clemens is no longer shooting for Met Art and, since this was essentially his site, they are scrambling to keep things going. The last time one of his sets was published was in September but it appears that his sets since April or May were from the files. Thierry Murell has stepped in, but things have changed....alot!
The number of releases has dropped to one a week, which is pretty awful considering the release schedule was 4 times a week just a year ago. And the sets that are being released are...inconsistent with the prior theme of the site and not up to the prior quality of this site or of the Met Art network. Some sets look like they were borrowed from ALSscan and some others seem like odd videos. Here's another example and this one is DAMN WEIRD! 5 sets in August, 7 sets in July, 8 sets in June and 8 sets in May. These were the last sets by Antonio Clemens and ALL OF THESE 28 SETS EXCEPT 1 were of the SAME MODEL! Now, the model is Irene and she is beautiful, but some of these "sets" were partials and the next release would be the rest. Like I said, this is just weird, especially for a site in the Met Art network. You would think they would have the collective resources to keep this site up and get it looking right again after 6 months.
Now, aside from this relatively recent weirdness, there is a lot of great 18-22 YO material here from before about May of 2018 all the way back to January of 2013. About 60-70% of the models are young, pretty and many of these models are girls you will not see elsewhere. You can tell they are new and, although there may be a few open-legged shots, you can also see that many have not yet found their confidence. All of those prior sets between 2013 and earlier this year were shot by Antonio Clemens. They are consistent and generally very good. Focus, lighting, sets, exposure, poses, etc. are all excellent.
The other 30-40% of the models in these sets are maybe a little older and much, much more experienced and open. For example, Anjelica, the pretty young porn star, has 8 videos and 3 photo sets from 2013-2015. She's not shy at all. Melena A, the little cat-tattooed gymnast turned flexy nude model is here with 17 fairly early sets, mostly photo sets. Her first set is called "Juicy Pussy". It is an accurate title but it easily could have been applied to any of her sets. There are others here, too, like 21 sets from the glam-style model Danica Jewels, here called Delilah G., and 24 videos from the wonderful naked ballarina Annett A. You get my point. The pre-2018 stuff on this site is a wonderful blend of young, light, fresh, delicate, sometimes a little shy beauties and OMG sexy porn stars and experienced, confident models that usually know how to give you what you are looking for.
This is another of the Met-Art sites that almost has the same navigation as Met-Art, but not quite. There is no option to open anything in another window. As a result, you have to either do this manually, or back up a lot. It really needs to be the same for all of these sites.
Although pricing is separate for each of the Met Art sites, they do have a nifty single sign-on feature that allows you to access any of the MA sites that you are a member of via a little pull-down menu on the main Met Art site. Once you log in using this option, the sight keeps track of you and allows access to any othe site you have subscribed too. Nice feature.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate than the one you asked for. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
OK, almost out of room. Bottom line: In spite of the recent failings, there is a TON of great material here. If you haven't visited this site yet, there is a holiday special of only $9.95. For that price, joining is a no brainer. I will keep an eye on this site and update the score and recommendation accordingly when the site theme and new material quality stabilizes. For now it is recommended with some reservations regarding new material.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Everybody looks relaxed and comfortable
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Not much bad here.
Site updates 4 times a week but more frequent updates in prior years.
Like some other MA sites, videos can be a little snoozy
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Bottom Line:
This is a single photographer, mostly images site that is part of the Met Art network but is marketed and billed separately. Rylsky is a top-notch photographer and the work presented here is an extension of the work he(?) publishes at Met Art. Sometimes there will be a video from a photo session published at Met Art. Sometimes the sets are from the same shoot day in a different location and sometimes the sets are of beginning or hopeful models and for whatever reason this set didn't make it over to Met Art. This includes MANY models that are extremely popular on Met Art from when they were just beginning.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 2000 photo sets
About 200 videos
About 300 models
4 updates a week but prior hears had near daily updates.
The site has been around since 2012
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Note that this is a relatively softcore solo model site with a few girl/girl scenes. There is no sex, there are no couples, there is no insertion, masturbation, etc. On the other hand, the girls are not shy, there are very few props, hardly any clothes (most sets start naked or very nearly naked) and the shots range from full body shots to close-ups. There are frequent open legged shots, a few naturally open labia and a moderate number of sets that include mild spreading. The girls are generally shaved or close cropped, but there are a few hairy girls. In general, if you enjoy admiring beautiful women in all types of settings, poses and positions, this is a good place to get unobstructed views of the wonderful female form.
These sets are of the same quality as the Met Art sets, meaning they are usually excellent. Good lighting, focus, composition and exposure. The models here are just as beautiful and often just as open as they are over at Met Art. Many of the same models are here, so if there are some you like at Met Art, they will probably be here too. Sometimes they are early sets and sometimes they are current.
Every time I look through this site I see something wonderful. Looking through the site to write the review, I found two models (Liv and Henrietta, both from 2014) that are absolutely mesmerizing. Plenty of world class models here like Emily Bloom, Astrud, Nancy and Halley. Thee is simply no zooming through this site. Nearly every set thumbnail becons you to slow down, look more closely, take it all in. Enjoy your time with these beautiful women.
Current sets are about 80% popular models and 20% fresh faces. Sometimes the fresh models look very young but for the most part, models seem to be in their early 20s.
Navigation is basically the same as Met Art with one important exception. Although there are user options so you can customize your experience, there is no option to open images in a new page like there is on Met Art. This means that image browsing is single threaded and you end up having to backpage to get back to sets or the update page. You can right-click of course, but it is clunkier than it should be. Making navigation on all of the Met Art network sites the same should be a priority for them. I am a member of 6 MA sites and there are some inconsistencies in site design and navigation that make it frustrating when switching between them.
On the plus-side, Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
The only reason I'm not giving this site a higher score is because of the relatively infrequent updates (4 new sets a week) compared to the top-billed site on the nework, Met Art.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
Bottom line: If you like the Met Art style of photography, which I personally think is among the best on the planet, you will not be dissappointed by this site. I have been a member for a couple of months now and still have not been able to look at everything since the last time I was here. If you look around, you can find it for $19 a month. PU has a special right now for only $9.95 a month. FOR GOD'S SAKE, MAN, JUST DO THAT! Plan on spending at least 2 months here. There is a ton of excellent material and you won't want to miss a thing. Highly recommended
Body part? The usual. In softcore modeling, there is a trend to provide more images with the model reclined and the photographer above, shooting down. I like that a lot.
All of the above is too rough for me. Sex is still about love and trust. It doesn't have to be tender-sweet all the time, but it should never be brutal or hugely demeaning.
Some basic items that will discourage me from joining a site:
1. No reviews anywhere.
2. A link to the site that originated on a "hunter" or repost site. (This is different from seeing a watermark on a repost site)
3. Stolen images in the tour or ad.
4. A no-name payment processor.
5. Documented bait-and-switch tactics (i.e. having to pay more to download)
6. Cross-check complaints.
All of that is AFTER I look and see good looking models and quality sets. Without those, I'm gone.
Depends on what you call fetishes. I love intimate bondage, whether it is in porn or in real life. There is nothing that says trust in your partner like allowing yourself to be tied down and teased into orgasm, or, for my wife, orgasm after orgasm after orgasm.
The disturbing thing about age is that many porn stars will do all kinds of stuff to stay popular. Rather than working out to stay fit, tat often means having work done. Having work done ages a porn star far more than birthdays do. Those models that can age gracefully without submitting to the knife have my utmost respect. And those stars that can stay fit and trim are at the top of my list.
I think it depends on the model/porn star. I've seen some work that was amazing and I've seen some that was pretty bad. Seeing an underboob scar in what is otherwise a beautiful model/porn star is perhaps the single most dissappointing thing in all of porn for me.
I have had the mixed pleasure of dating a few girls with boob jobs. They look great but feel pretty awful and tend to be sensitive. When looking at a model, anything that reminds me that they are fake tends to remind me how they feel. Moment ruined.
I have met a few on-line and in-person. On-line is about what you would expect..pretty basic. In-person, it depends on the event. Best thing you can do with ANY pro anything when you meet them in person. NEVER TALK SHOP! That goes for porn stars, athletes, actors, anyone. I fly first class a lot and have had some amazing people sit next to me. I will say hello and leave them the hell alone. Often, the minute they realize you are not some fan, they will start a real conversation. I've had that happen with actors, models and pro-football and baseball players (I honestly didn't know who the pro ball players were but knew they were somebody because people kept saying hello as they walked by to board behind us.) And the funniest thing is that once you get some of these guys talking, they WON'T SHUT UP!
OK, here's the deal. It isn't about having porn stars back as much as it is about having a wide and prolific variety of material when they are here and in their prime. The original Star Wars movies are still pretty good even though most of the actors are, in one way or another, long gone. That's because the media is still viable. A wonderful porn star or model is completely timeless as long as her work remains relevent and the media technology remains viable. I still stumble over material from some of my favorite models, but the really old stuff is often just too small to keep or watch. But anything in HD or larger images should be good for a long time. Do I want to see retired stars today? Not really. Do I want to see more material from when they were fucking amazing? Absolutely! A really smart porn star or model today should be negotiating to have some of their material put away for future use. That way, they can retire AND still publish!
As a trend, POV seems to have taken off and VR is gaining in popularity as the tech becomes more accessible. Personally, I think Hololens tech will be HUGE when it finally gets perfects. That is when your glasses allow you to see things in your room as though they/it/she is right there with you. Totally different from VR and much more practical.
This isn't really about the format but about the quality of the content. Some girls are pretty hard to watch in SD. Some are fucking goddesses in 4K or in VR. Higher resolution will ultimately mean better quality, better make-up and better hygiene.
I don't really follow the private lives of porn stars, but I have known a few dancers who went on to do porn. It is SUCH a messed up industry in the US, and so many of these girls are a little messed up when it comes to relationships, that if any porn star can be happily married, I am really happy for them. Now....what I WOULD like to know is if hetero marraiges end up with more porn stars quitting than gay (mostly lesbian) marraiges. My impression is that since gay marraige is already so progressive, married, gay porn stars are more likely to continue working. No data to back that up, though.
No site, but I do still have a couple of very old Playboy and Penthouse magazines that I look at every few years. And I still remember the name of the first Playboy Playmate I ever jerked off to... This is different from sites that I will probably always be a member of.
Well, sorry, the first thing about a porn star is her look. Other things come second. There are a few porn stars and models that I have a hard time watching because of some trait or quirk. So for me, they usually start with an A based on looks and lose points for the other stuff. Now....I do have tremendous respect for a few models/porn stars because they are smart, smooth and professional, but they started out beautiful anyway.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
