Well... In college I dated two roommates in my apartment building and niether knew. Fun, but not as fun as it sounds. At one point, one was knocking on the door while I was in bed with the other. Sadly, no threesome.
Years later, back when people could still get to airport gates to meet passengers, my new bride-wife met me at the gate one night wearing just heels, stockings and a raincoat. She even flashed me a couple of times. Holy fuck that was incredible. We got in the car and she took off the coat as soon as we got out of the parking garage. We lived out in the country so on the way home, we just pulled off on a little farm access road and I fucked the hell out of her outside against the car. That was absolutely porn movie worthy!
I'm about 75% computer but I have several big TVs, a home theater and a VR headset. Depends on who's home, who's watching it with me and how much time I/we have to watch it.
Nice review! Thanks! Sounds like the place hasn't changed much from when I reviewed it 4 years ago. Too bad as this used-to-be (like...a decade ago) one of my favorite sites. But it sold and the group that has been running it doesn't understand that it is easier to keep a customer by treating him/her well than it is to get new ones. Oh well.
Oh, if you like oil scenes, there are some prettty good ones over in the Fantasy-HD network on a site called lubed.com. Most sets are POV also.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many popular, young, good looking porn stars and models (180+)
Exclusive, excellent quality videos
Wide vartiety of settings and scenarios.
Good Navigation.
Decent search functions.
Good download speeds.
Video downloads come in 8 sizes and newer vids are in 4k.
Very good separation of the types of videos here into 4 groups.
Erotica-X features sensual sex videos that are perfect for watching with your partner.
All videos are dated.
Cons:
Not much in the con department:
Photo sets seem like afterthoughts.
Photos are only in one size. (1920x1280).
No zip files.
No keyword search.
Only one update a week, on average.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is a quality site with a lot of great material from some of the best looking female porn stars in the industry. Although the site is billed as a network, it is one well integrated site with material broken down in to 4 categories: Hard-X, Erotica-X, Dark-X and Lesbian-X. These categories are fairly self explanatory, and they do a surprisingly good job of separating Erotica-X, which is mostly straight couples or threesome sex in more sensual situations (stuff you might watch with your girlfriend), with hard-X, which includes anal, DP, some huge dicks in some really small girls (i.e. Piper Perri) and generally more active and aggresive physical sex. Lesbian-X is all about the ladies pleasuring themselves and each other and ranges from solo stuff to some serious jamming and it includes some peeing and other stuff.
This site is pretty large. I count 1120 videos in all categories, about 578 of which are Hard-X, 85 are Lesbian-X , 274 are Erotica-X and 168 are Black-X. There are 200 female porn-stars listed and no male stars listed in the directory although they are listed on individual video page. Videos date back to 2013 and there is one new release a week.
I mentioned that Erotica-X is a really excellent collection of videos to watch with your wife, girlfriend or partner. I say this because they are well done videos, sensual, gentle, caring, very respectful of the women in the scenes (no throttling, rough sex, abuse of any kind). There are a few girl-girl scenes in Erotica-X, but they are really gentle compared to the fuck-fest in Lesbian-X. If you enjoy watching nice sensual sex with your partner, this is probably a really good place to find it.
Site layout and navigation are good. Models are listed, searchable and cross-referenced on each-video page. That goes for male models also (except for some gang-bang and gang-blowjob scenes where the male models are not listed). If you like a model, click on her name and all of the vids for her/him appear. You can create a playlist and you can add models, female or male, to your favorites. There is a thumbs-up/thumbs-down ranking for each video so you can see how they rate on their page, but there is no scoring or ranking system and there are no keyword options, although there are some "categories" on each video page that lists things like Hardcore, Facial, Fingering, Brunette, Blowjob, Anal, Tittyfuck, Big Tits, Pussy Licking, etc. This is a single threaded site, so if you want multiple windows, you have to use your keyboard.
I have to say that most of the sets, lighting, video and, of course, the actresses are beautiful. Somebody put a lot of thought into making sure that you aren't distracted by too much BS in video. The women have no or very few tattoos and, thank god, so do the men (I don't mind really well done tattoos, but some male pornstars on other sites are literally covered with them and that is really distracting. Not here.) Make-up is nicely done, too.
Probably the only shortcoming has to do with the photo sets included with the videos. Many of the images themselves are excellent, but the way they are provided, managed and named, with no zip file options, makes them difficult to download and keep. A few other sites do a much better job of this.
Bottom line: In an internet seemingly overflowing with high-production-quality porn sites, X-Empire is a pleasant surprise. The overall material may not quite be glam-porn like some other sites, but the material is probably comparable to Vixen or much of the Fantasy-HD network and far better than the run-of-the-mill porn site.
The main reason I didn't score this site higher is because they only release one new video every week or so. That makes it hard to stick around once you join for a month and get a chance to see what you want to see. That said, many sites in this category only release a set or two a week, so I don't think that is a deal killer-by any means. I woudl recommend that you visit this site soon if you haven't been here before and then check back every year or so. I took advantage of the PU discounted rate, and for the discounted rate, this is an excellent deal. Happy viewing!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great model interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not at all shy
Improved site layout and navigation
Token based login (remembers you)
4 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 6000x4000 pixels
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation much better but still a little quirky
Videos are a sometimes bit snoozy
Bottom Line:
This is my third review of this site in about 6 years, and I'm happy to say that, with an improved layout, better file size options and less inhibited models, it is better than ever.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best.
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on the number of sets, but it is now up to about 5000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last 4 years. The pre-2010 sets tend to be a little more "Naked girl in the woods" but for the past several years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in many different poses...standing, reclining, come-hithering, you name it. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Photographer interaction with the model is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward, ugly or uncomfortable anywhere. The photographers here are simply the best in the industry. They start with beautiful women and turn them into breathtaking goddesses. Stefan Soell, for example, manages to regularly find and photograph some of humanity's finest examples of the female form in some of the most beatiful settings on earth. And the other photographers are just as good, providing you with uncluttered, nicely focused, obstruction- free, mostly prop-free views of beautiful, confident, 100% natural women.
Just a reminder that this is relatively soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and a few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want harder core in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views from every angle of great looking models. In the past few years, the sets have become somewhat more explicit. That is a huge change from prior years and adds another level to the awesomeness of these models.
The videos usually follow the pattern of a similar photo shoot. They are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. There are a few close-ups, etc., but there is usually no masturbation. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (480p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
The photo sets typically have about 80-120 images in them and the images can be downloaded individually or in zip files of the whole set. Image sizes in the recent zips range from a now-puny 800 pixels across to a decent poster sized 6000 pixels across. To get the really big images, you have to download the zip file.
Femjoy updated their site layout a couple of years ago and overall it is a huge improvement. Very large set thumbnails include the model name, the set name, the photographer name, the set date and the number of images in the set. The main pages are an uncluttered design with weekly videos on the right, favoriate models toward the bottom and a couple of other sites referenced at the very bottom. There are also pages for just photo sets and pages for just videos. On those pages, you can navigate easily to any month of any year all the way back to 2004. Nicely done. No aggresive partner marketing in your face like so many other sites. There is a search function for models and photographers, a set card for each model and photographer, and a scoring system of 1-5 stars for both the model and the photographer.
The ONLY thing I still have not gotten used to is the in-set navigation. It is much better than before, but there are no options for opening an image in a new window and th eback button doesn't really work. Everything here opens in the original window and if you try to open an image in a new window, some functionality, like image size selection or next/previous is lost. Click on a set and you get nice large thumbnails of all of the images in the set on one page. HUGE PLUS. There is a large X in the upper right hand corner that will get you back to the page you came from. Same with the images. The first time you select an image, you get the smallest size until you chose a different size, then the site remembers that size but only for the current set. And the X in the upper right corner will take you back to the previous page, but it takes you to the TOP of the previous page rather then where you were. A little inconvenient if you are looking at images at the bottom of a set or a set thumbnail at the bottom of a page.
OK, I'm out of room....
Bottom line? If you are into medium-soft core and like young, showy, confident, OMG beautiful young women, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content and good pricing. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. I will have a subscription here until either the site or I are no longer around.
Nice review, thanks! I also like this site a lot but there is one thing that ensures I will only join once a year or so and only for a month: No discounted long term rates. When you pick a tier, the monthly price is the only option. There is no quarterly rate, no annual rate and no lifetime rate. Although I suppose I understand the webmaster logic behind this, it is flawed from both a revenue and a cash-flow perspective. Like you, I am a VOLUME consumer. I have 5 or 6 annual memberships at various rates equal to, what, about 50-70% off the monthly rate. I would not be a member of those sites for 12 months at the regular rate under any circumstances. Instead, there are a dozen or more sites that I join for a month every one to two years to catch up on. This site, rather than getting $100-130 from me for a recurring annual membership, gets $30-40 from me (or maybe $70 for unrestricted downloads, another PITA) for a single month of a monthly membership every year or two. An annual membership would be one transaction, one servicer transaction fee, one account set-up, and cash up-front rather than once a month for month or two most members probably stick around. So now that my review of this site, which was originally one of my highest, has expired, I will eventually join again for a month and write another review. I'm sure the site is just as good, but the philosophy of the site revenue model and the way they treat subscribers has soured things somewhat.
Thanks for the great review, Wraith0711! I like POV stuff and may try this site as ATK is usually pretty good quality stuff. I do , however, usually fast forward to the good stuff... :-)
I have been a member of that network several times and cancelling is not as easy as it should be.
Although it is sometimes very difficult to find the biller site, this is the best way to see what you have signed up for and what is active. I regularly go to ccbill, epoch and segpay to make sure that what I cancelled has actually been cancelled and to see what is active. (Unfortunately, although Epoch takes Paypal, there is no easy way to track your Paypal paid accounts on the Epoch site yet without a subscription number.) I hate to say it but sometimes it is hard to keep track of what I have signed up for and what I've cancelled so this is the easiest way for me.
I agree with you about softcore videos, but it often depends on the model. Girl-in-the-woods or girl-in-her-room videos tend to be pretty boring and contrived and waaaay too many models that look amazing in images lose all kinds of points when you see them move. I've seen some very good softcore where the model is clearly trying to turn the viewer on, but I didn't see any of that here. (Twisty's or the first videos in a set from In The Crack come to mind.) When you say France I think Anna AJ from Met Art who had several drool-worthy videos. There are a couple of other models on MA that are just nice to watch because they are graceful (Annett A, Lorena B., etc.) but that is about beauty, not arousal (well, ok watching a beautiful , reclining girl put her legs straight out to the side and over her head can be pretty arousing...). These days, I'm not into "regular" porn video much as observing two other people have sex isn't that exciting anymore unless the girl is an 11 AND a great actress who doesn't pull faces and moan unnaturally. Instead I like POV and, when I can, VR scenes that are all about a virtual partner and, you know, ME!! :-) We are so jaded.....
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Wide variety of models in all shapes and sizes.
Many top European models
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2011, over 900 models)
Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons:
Navigation is OK, but sometimes annoying.
Many videos are so so.
Some photo sets are so so.
Some popular models have videos only.
Some models only have one set.
Silly props in some sets.
Many models have assigned names that don't match other sites.
Headshots are sometimes not representative of material.
Individual image file names are not unique.
Bottom Line:
Showy Beauty is a non-Met-Art sister site to Amour Angels. (Some of the sets even have props that say Amour Angels.) This site has pretty much EVERY met-art model, mostly in sets shot before they became uber-popular, plus a bunch of sets of models that only shot one or two sets and maybe a handful that didn't make the cut to be on Met Art for one reason or another. The site is not part of the Met Art network but, as I said, has many models that appear on MA and probably shares several photographers. There is a very broad variety of model here. In addition to several hundred european models, there are a handful of asian models, some south american models and a few (I think) pacific island models. A LOT of models I've never seen elsewhere and I have been around a bit. Most models are young looking and petite, although several are more significant and quite chesty. A veritable smorgasboard of shapes and sizes. There are a lot of popular models here, mostly from early shoots. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Showy Beauty and there are a few others that you honestly would not recognize at first because they look so different. A few popular Met Art models only have videos here and I suspect that is because the matching photo sets made it to a Met Art site. This is not a B-roll site, exactly, but much of the material is similar to the stuff you would find on the met-art secondary sites. The difference is there is more variety here.
Showy Beauty is fairly true to the name, but don't expect anything too extreme. Each model is different. Some models are modest, some open their legs and a very very few have open labia.
This is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertion. Even eye contact varies quite a bit between sets and models. The emphasis, for the most part, is simply admiration of the beautiful nude female form.
The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2011. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1200+ sets. There are over 750 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (About 90 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale, but the scale seems pretty whacky to me. Most models are in the 5 to 7 range and many top Met Art models are toward the bottom of the rankings. This may be because the sets of the top models are not as high quality or revealing or just because not very many people vote. There are a LOT of pretty teen models here. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Showy Beauty gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but image quality is typically very good.
Navigation is generally good and download speeds are good but the site is a little clunky at times. Photo sets are presented in multiple pages and there is no way to change it. Navigation "Buttons" throughout the site change color when you hover over them, but they do nothing unless you click on the actual text within the button you want. Super annoying. Zip files have unique names but individual images, either downloaded or in the zip files, don't. File names are "Showy Beauty-001.jpg" to Showy Beauty-xxx.jpg, telling you nothing about the set, model, date, etc. Very frustrating if you keep a "best of" folder. ALL items...sets, models, images, etc., open in the same page so you are single threaded and have to ckick "back" a lot unless you remember to open in a new tab.
Because these models are not very experienced, many sets have little or rather tentative eye contact. There is a fair amount of outdoor "girl in the woods" type shooting. Most more recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and, sometimes, fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. The resolution of the videos is not listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 70 to about 180 images. Videos are 10-20 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around. Honestly, the videos are not terribly exciting but the view is usually pretty good.
Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, psuedo-amatuer or early-career pro models of all shapes and sizes, then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I searched for discounts and found one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.
Depends on the quality of the material. I usually DL 1080 but sometimes 720. For VR, I download the 1920x1080 resolution as the larger ones (2300x1080) create really huge files and don't always work properly.
Well that really sucks. Not sure what happened but I've been a member of this site a couple of times and have never been scammed. I am also not at all sure how you got to Rocketgate/VXNBill because Epoch was their servicer for me. In fact, I just cancelled my account and got exactly the expected service from Epoch. Entered in account and email and the subscription popped right up. 30 seconds later, it was cancelled. BTW, Rocketgate is still servicing a lot of sites like the Met Art sites. I do see that vxnbill is associated with this group of sites but I've never used them. Again, sorry you had an issue.
OMG this is a pain in the ass. It has happened to me five or six times in the last year or so. I a couple of annuals and a couple of highly discounted monthly subscriptions (cheaper than annual), plus I rotate through most of their their sites once a year or so. Every time I sign up or cancel a site, my master account gets screwed up. For me, the problem is usually because they use different billers for different promotions. So two subscriptions are Epoch, two are rocketpay and one or two are ccbill. When they reset things, the different biller accounts don't synch up and logins fail. I had one account that continued to charge me for a couple of months before I realized that I wasn't actually cancelled like the site said. Of course, once I point all this out, they fix it within a day or two, but damn it is frustrating!
Dude, why are you here on Porn Users? To find out about sites? To maybe find a good site and get a better than street price for a subscription? Whenever anyone in this community sees a discount on a site, they should let anyone who might be interested know about it. That's all I was doing. When this site first came out, it was $10 a month. Once it was established, it went to $20. Now it is $29 a month but there are specials to be found. I reviewed the site a while ago and just signed up again and thought I would share that it is $9.95 recurring at $9.95, which hasn't happened lately. If you don't like the site, then don't sign up. It is a good site but not a great one. For $9.95, anyone who is curious has got very little to lose. Now, if you think that is spam, you should look up the definition of spam because clearly it isn't what you think it is. If you don't want to try the site, that's fine. But don't knock me for wanting to let people know there is a good promotion running. It is thoughtless comments like yours that make people like me want to stop writing reviews and comments. If you DID have a bad experience with the site, don't just bitch at me about it. SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE!
OH! And just by Coincidence, I rejoined Vixen.com today on their black Friday $9.95 a month special. Great site and excellent videos but one of their MALE actors is COVERED with tattoos from shoulder to ankle, front to back including arms. OMFG that is SO distracting! How am I supposed to imagine that I am the guy in these scenes when the guy looks like that! As I'm thinking about it, the male actors also need to be tattoo free so the tattoos are not distracting. I encounter heavily tattood male actors on many sites, including POV and VR sites, and in many cases, they have more tattoos than the girls do. Absolutely not OK!
Two different scenarios. Met Art and bad ass. Other than the occasional tiny tattoo on some porn models, I prefer not to see them. These girls are fucking beautiful. Why agree to be some oter persons canvas for life? It detracts from the physical beauty of the girl. Even relatively small but prominent tattoos on truly beautiful women, like those on Melena Morgan or Eva Taylor are hugely dissappointing. That said, there are a few cases where tattoos on a really sexy girl help to reinforce the bad-girl image. These would be girls that are physically attractive, but have really high quality sleeves, thigh or shoulder tattoos. A few examples can be found on Suicidegirls, but not all SGs are good examples. To me, these are girls that look like they would be a lot of fun to fuck and would really enjoy it. So I am a split decision on the tattoo thing. Mostly no, but sometimes fuck yes!
I like to watch POV and VR video and there are a few peeves. First, the guy should NEVER MAKE A SOUND. In POV/VR, YOU are the guy so when the guy says something, your reaction is "Who the fuck was that?" like there is somebody standing behind you. IN VR, it actually sounds like there is somebody standing behind you.... The other thing I don't really like is when the girls get too blatant about what is going in. This may seem silly, but "Put your dick in my pussy", especially with foriegn accent, is nowhere near as hot as just "Fuck me". I dunno, as lame as this is, I prefer a little verbal subtlety. No need for an intercourse blow-by-blow.
Yes, I use the master pull down to access everything, too. That is where the problems occur as I can get into some sites and not others. Whenever I add a site or change my Password, the problems begin.
The support staff is usually very helpful when I contact them but occasionally, they will automatically reset my password even when I ask them not to.
But the problem goes a little deeper than that. I know I'm bringing some of this on myself, but I'm guessing you have experienced the same thing. I have had a Met Art membership for over 10 years now. Occasionally, I will get a discount offer for one of the MA sites from some other source. But when I try to take advantage of the discount, the MA network recognizes my email and presents me with an undiscounted rate. The only way around this is to use a different browser and a different email. So I have 6 subscriptions under 2 different email addresses. Even worse, the subscriptions are supported by 3 different billers (ccbill, epoch and rocketpay). A few years ago, I pointed all of this out to the support folks and they consolidated all of my accounts under one email address and user name....until I add a subscription or change my password. When that happens, some kind of reset occurs and a bunch of my sites are still linked in the master menu, but when I access them, I'm told the subscription has expired. The bottom line is that Met Art policy, created by some executive who never has to deal with customers, treats customers the same way a cell phone company or Comcast treats customers. They create all kinds of incentives for new customers, but don't want existing customers to take advantage of those incentives. This is obvious even within the Met Art Network, where if you click on a link directly, say...of a model that has other sets on other sites listed at the bottom of the page, the sign up is $29 a month for that site, but if you go through the pull down menu, the same sign up is $19 a month. And when you find a promotion for, say, $9 a month or $79 a year, the system does everything possible to ensure that you can't get it because you are an existing customer. To be fair, you can't really blame them for doing this, but you can't really blame me for wanting to take advantage of the best discounts either. I know the support people spend a LOT of time fixing things when people work the system to get better rates. I am a shining example of that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Many solo masturbation/insertion and girl/girl scenes.
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Several popular European models
Good navigation
Cons:
Very "artsy" site.
Billed as a "kink" site but just kink costumes
Very little model eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
The unified login system on the metart network has become a NIGHTMARE!
Bottom Line:
Stats (Deduced):
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc. Some are unique to this site.
At some point, MetArt decided to make this more of a fetish network, but it isn't really a fetish network at all. There are some fetish costumes and a few girls that start lightly tied up or wearing fetish clothing (in SOLO sets). Many of the sets are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And about 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.
The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.
The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. There is a large section on the right half of th elanding page that highlights active working cam models.
Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.
And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark psuedo-kinky theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. If you are familiar with other Met-Art sets, you can see that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art.
Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better. There is also a consolidated MetArt web site control at the very top of the page, but it does not work very well....
I've had HUGE issues with passwords and common access across MetArt sites. The pull down menu will say I am a member of 6 sites,for example, but when I try to access them, something breaks. Every time I add a new site or have to reset my common password, I lose access to one or more of the 6 or so sites I've signed up for for and pay for. Sometimes it take DAYS and dozens of email exchanges to get it all fixed again. I'm not sure what the issue is but it appears to be related to the different credit card service providers MetArt uses.
Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.
I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standard
You could not have sex with a woman because she was shaved? Seriously? I'm sure there were a few other things going on there that you are not mentioning.....right???
Somebody "not-trusted" me because I dissed this site so I signed up again thinking maybe it had changed. Navigation is a little different. Sets are still not dated. Still one set a week. Now only about 275 sets total. One new model I recognize from Hegre.com (Ageta here, Magdelena on Hegre, one of the circus twins...) The rest are amateurs. Still very little make-up. Still very clinical. Sstill very little eye contact. Mostly horrible photo-set videos showing how gawky most of these girls are. Many recent release videos are not full HD and several recent videos have opening credits listing a different web site (so it is older purchased content). I wrote an updated review but it dissappeared when my PU login timed out so all I have time to write is a comment. Still rate it less than 70. There are a few much better "flexy" sites and several softcore sites that do flexy occasionally, but much better than this. I just spent $30 to see if maybe my impression of this site was wrong. It wasn't.
I grew up in south Florida where they had every type of porn/sex/strip outlet and I had sampled most of them by the time I left for college. I tried a theater once but it was pretty boring considering how lax the rules were back then at some of the strip clubs.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
