Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : skippy (0)  

Feedback:   All (584)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (98)  |   Replies (411)

Other:   Replies Received (289)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 598 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
76
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)

Annual rate now $119. Even for renewals.

I'm a little dissappointed that the annual subscription rate is now among the highest in this genre at $119. That is more than Met Art, Hegre, MPL and Watch4Beauty. The $89 annual rate listed by PU no longer works. I've been a member of FemJoy for nearly a decade but am going to wait until I see a better rate someplace before I renew.

04-17-18  06:23am

Replies (3)
Reply
77
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

These days, a lot of the latex pocket-pussy things are made in the likeness of many porn stars. I probably have a couple, but I can't recall which porn stars they are. I don't buy those things because they are in somebody's likeness....

04-17-18  06:15am

Reply
78
Visit Daring Sex

Daring Sex
(0)
Reply of tilcyrella's Review

I'm not sure I understand. You gave the site a 95 but didn't really explain why. Are you really saying this is one of the best porn sites on the Internet, which is what 95 means?

Also, what is daring about the sex? Is it in public? Is it in dangerous places? Looking at the images, I don't see anything particularly daring.


04-02-18  06:15pm

Reply
79
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(0)
Reply of perversecult's Review

I visit MFC and chaturbate moderately often, but I do not look for privatge shows there. There are other sites that are set up for private shows, like metcams. With MFC and Chaturbate, mostly Chaturbate, I'll give tokens to the girls that are particularly impressive so they do things in thier public room. I don't care if somebody else is geting off on my dime. I'm not really there for the conversation anyway.

Just look at the numbers of viewers in each girl's room on these sites and you will see that for every one person paying tokens, there are hundreds just watching.

Don't expect a first class private experience on these sites. Just go to one that specializes in private if that is what you want.


04-02-18  06:10pm

Reply
80
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Call them up and telling them you are moving to a competitor. (Check to make sure you have a competitor first) They will connect you to the "customer retention" department. Those people are authorized to negotiate a better deal and will usually offer a pretty nice package for 6 months or so.

04-02-18  06:00pm

Reply
81
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

I cull on a regular basis. Non-HD videos are pretty unwatchable these days. I also have an archive of stuff that I might want to look at but is more than 10 years old.

03-30-18  05:12pm

Reply
82
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What merc77 said.

03-30-18  05:06pm

Reply
83
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Did you really think anyone on this site was going to say Porn? :-)

03-30-18  05:05pm

Reply
84
N/A Reply of Loki's Poll

I'm thinking maybe this question could have been phrased differently....

I've never watched porn in public or on a smart phone.

I do, however, have several iPads including one I keep next to my bed and one that I travel with. So I will, occasionally, watch porn on an iPad in a hotel room. Considering there was once an entire industry focused on getting you to buy expensive Spectravision movies in hotel rooms, I don't consider this a big deal.


03-30-18  05:02pm

Reply
85
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

Ok, four things (started out as two but then I started thinking about it...). First, if I'm watching a sex scene by myself, I want the male to be as non-descript as possible. If the fantasy is supposed to be that the guy is me, then I don't really want the video to emphaisize him at all and he can NOT be distinctive in any way. I am older but, as long as I'm fantasizing anyway, I may as well fantasize that I am 20-35 and I certainly don't really want to see a 60+ guy in a sex scene. it is too distracting.
Second, the same thing applies to POV and VR videos. If the guy is a surrogate me, he should be as generic as possible. "Hey! Look at my giant chest tattoo!" or "Hey look! I'm Black!" is not really something I enjoy be distracted with in VR or POV.
Third, there are some male actors that are so incredibly sleazy looking, I have a hard time watching the video. These are not necessarily older guys but guys who look like they just crawled out from under a bridge. Fetish Network has a prominant male who falls into this category. He is perfect for the "home invasion", "hitchhiker" and older bondage videos on that site, but after a while, I found I just could not watch him.
And fourth, if my wife and I are watching porn, the male needs to be the best looking guy on the planet and he needs to be...capable in many ways. The idea of the two of us watching an older guy bang a younger girl in a video does nothing for her, so it sort of defeats the purpose of watching the video in scene in the first place.

Those are my 4 thoughts on the subject!


03-30-18  04:55pm

Comment
86
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(0)

Update on Anal...and a note to the webmasters

OK, first of all, there have been no new anal scenes that I can find since the few that were posted in 2014. So if you are avoiding the site because you don't like anal, go ahead and join up.

Second, to the webmaster. The marketing and page positioning of the additional-purchase "Staff Selection" videos is annoying and insulting. On at least one page (streaming), there is no indication at all that the video is an axtra cost purchase until you click on it and see the option for the preview and offer to purchase. I subscribe to many of the Met Art sites (6 currently) and this is the only one that tries to sell me extra videos. On this MA site, the spot normally reserved for the newest video or photo shoot is always occupied by this bait Staff Selection video. Just fricking STOP IT! If you want to sell videos seperately, establish a site for that or at least put them over on the side where you market the live site. We know you have the resources to do that. You guys have terrific sites! Don't cheapen them by doing things that some of the other, sleazier sites try.

03-17-18  07:51am

Replies (1)
Comment
87
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)

Don't. Just Don't.

Two things.

First, the site has stopped creating new material for most of the old sites and created a few new ones that are even lamer than the old ones.

Second, cancelling is even more difficult than before. There is a cancel page, but all it does is offer you a discount and does not confirm you have been cancelled. THe only clickable option on the page is to continue your membership. They are now using a "service" from Segpay called Segpay gateway. If you call, email or chat with Segpay, they insist that they have no record. I had all of the billing information right in front of me and he still said he had no record. (Really sucks on their part....I guess I'll never use Segpay again). The ONLY way to cancel is through the web site. I have seen a lot of crappy billers before, but this one, supported and condoned by an otherwise decent biller, is the worst. After 10 minutes chatting with a guy at Segpay, he basically said that the only thing I can do is contact the webmaster at Fetish Network. Wow. That's incredible.

So all of the folks here telling you about cancellation issues are absolutely correct. Cancelling at Fetish Network is a pain much more real than any of the simulated fetish crap they post.

03-04-18  10:00pm

Replies (2)
Review
88
Visit Amour Angels

Amour Angels
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Many "petite" top European models
Site claims no silcone, all natural.
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2006!)
Decent navigation
Over 320 models
Many of the models seem to be having fun.

Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons: Site design is a little busy
Navigation could be better.
Many videos are rather slow when watching.
Constant use of teen and pre-teen props can get old.
Although all models were legal age when the shoots were done, some sets do seem a little borderline.
Bonus site is marginal.
Bottom Line: Amour Angels follows a fairly specific formula in that it often attempts to portray its models in a very innocent, young or teen-oriented way. The models are generally very young looking and very petite, mostly A or B-cups although several are larger, and the sets and props help promote that type of fantasy. Most of the time, this portrayal can be very effective. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Many of the models here are also on other sites like Met Art, but here they look or are made to look younger. This is in part because many of these models WERE younger, probably just 18+ and just starting out when these sets were shot. A great example is a model named Marika on this site. She is petite and looks extremely young in sets from 2016 with a more mature looking set from 2017. Today she is a featured model on Watch4Beauty who goes by the name of Helga Grey. Other models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Amour Angel with several sets from very early in their careers and a few more current sets.

Note that this is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertions and very little spreading, although many sets do include fully spread legs. The emphasis, for the most part, is on the beauty of innocence.

The teeny-bopper effect is achieved by the use of primary colors, props like lolli-pops and hooded pajamas, striped leggins and tights, rainbows and hearts, chocolate, etc. Many of the sets don't include any specific props like this and would probably be just as home on another site like Met-Art, except that the models, as hard to believe this is possible, are even more petite. Just find the youngest looking girls on a Met Art or similar site and chances are good they are here.

The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2006. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1600+ sets. There are over 320 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can always go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (At least 120 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale. There are top models of the month and year and profiles of new models. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Amour Angels gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but set quality is typically very good.

Navigation is good and download speeds are good but the site is a little more ornate or busy than most due in part to the teeny-bopper them.

Older material is sort of "girl in the woods" with just posing and varying levels of eye contact. More recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. Oddly, the resolution of the videos is not clearly listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 40 to about 130 images. Videos are 10-30 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around.

Oh, there is a bonus site called "Teen Art Club" that appears to be similar material but much, much older,perhaps the prior generation of this site. The largest images on Teen Art Club are 1024 by 682, there are no videos and I don't recognize any of the models.

Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, petite models then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I joined after searching for discounts and finding one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.

03-02-18  10:33am

Replies (1)
Reply
89
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of kutloch's Reply

Hi,

Thanks for the update. It is always nice to see the webmasters checking sites like this for reviews and comments. It shows that they care and are attentive to their subscriber's comments. I have seen the mobile option on the site lately, but I am old-school with a PC and giant monitor. Overall a terrific site!


02-26-18  12:07pm

Reply
90
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of sonofzog's Reply

I recall reading that he passed away but thought somebody else had taken over at the site. His stuff was amazing, though.

02-26-18  11:46am

Reply
91
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of sonofzog's Reply

I'll add that I've never seen a site that only provides images in landscape-only or portrait-only format. And if you want some GREAT wallpapers, go check out Digital Desire. J. Stephen Hicks is an awesome photographer and, in addition to regular photo shoots, he provides one nude and one beautiful landscape scene a day (often it is a great landscape with an ungodly beautiful girl someplace in the image, often clothing optional.)
I was last a member of Digital Desire in 2017 and and can say it is medium-core old-school glamour. Good stuff if you haven't been there before.


02-25-18  07:43pm

Reply
92
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of sonofzog's Reply

Sonofzog,

OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.

Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.

Hope that helps.

...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!


02-25-18  07:34pm

Review
93
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Site has been around since before 2005!
Excellent selection of top-tier, beautiful models
Exclusive content
Many of the most popular European models with a few specatcular exclusive models.
Several exclusive latin/ethnic models.
Models are open and uninhibited.
Lots of eye contact with the camera.
EVERY photo set has an acompanying video.
Navigation is generally very good
Multiple zip and video resolution options.
Multiple display options.
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are now up to 1080p with some 4k.
All sets, including zips and videos, are uniquely named.
Cons: Not much here.
Only 1 update every 2-3 days. (15 sets a month)
Navigation could be a little better.
There are a few "unconventional" beauties.
Sets are not dated on every thumbnail screen.
Bottom Line: This is a mostly a solo girl site but there are a few things that make it different.

First, every photo set comes with a "behind the scenes" video. I'm usually not a big fan of videos taken during photo shoots, but these videos shed a little light on the models by showing personalities and interactions as well as shedding light on the photo shoot process. Any wannabe nude photographer should watch some of these.

Second, the girls in most of these sets are not shy in any way. We're talking legs-spread-so-far-their-toes-are-beyond-different-horizons open. Many of the sets are orgasm sets with spreading, insertions, giant two prong vibrators, etc. This is not Met Art. It's not even Sex Art. It is a place where many of those models go beyond softcore but still manage to look absolutely fantastic. Some of the girl/girl scenes are also very well done. Some of these sets make the girls look like sisters, but a few are really impressive. Clearly these girls are into each other, which makes it that much more interesting to watch.

Third, the photography. It is outstanding. Every inch of every model is in focus. None of that artsy-fartsy old-school soft-focus stuff here. Although they get pretty creative sometimes, you will NEVER see a model dressed like Marie Antoinette on this site. You will never see a set where the lighting is filtered through window blinds so you can't see the model. Every set...every inch...of every model...from pretty much every angle. Damn, that's nice. Now, there are occasionally instances where that is a mixed thing. Sorry in advance for the visual... There is one slender model with unbelievable breasts and an O-ring shaped labia. She actually lactates in one of her videos. Because they don't airbrush anything, you can see that her skin is fairly translucent so you can see veins. It's initally.....conflicting. In the end, the girls assets win and you will still want her, though. OK, enough of that!

Navigation is good, but it could be better. I think it is likely that the site just outgrew it. There are tags, but not user tags and you can't search on them. There are years worth of sets here but you can't, for example, go to the updates from June of 2014. You have to scroll back, sequentially, to get back that far. You can search on models and there is a model bio page for each model.

For sets, you pick a set and the page goes to the set with a cover photo, the video and between 45 and 90 images. Click on an image and it opens in a new "Viewing" window. Click on another image and the "viewing" window changes to the new image. Depending on the size image you chose, you can then click on the image to make it full size. You can always right click and open images in new windows if you want. This navigation style is better than most sites, but it could be improved. It would also be great to be able to more easily view the older material by allowing navigation to specific months. Of course, to do that, every set will need to have a date-stamp.

Oh, there is a blog section that highlights activities, new models and shoots. It can be interesting, but it ussually helps to show you models that are coming. Kind f a tease.

I have had an annual subscription to this site for a couple of years now and it is easily in my top 3 or 4. The site is huge now, so I'm scoring it up there with Met Art, Femjoy, Sex Art, Hegre and MPL Studios. The content is every bit as good as those sites.

I can't quite get a read on site stats because they are not published, but I will make estimates:

2378 sets/videos
about 250 models

I would have scored this site higher except for the minor navigation issues and the fact that it does not update daily. But the quality photography and videography still puts it among my top 3 or 4.

Bottom line: If you like solo models on sites like Met Art, Sex Art, Femjoy, JoyMii, MPLStudios and Hegre and are looking for something a little more hardcore, this is absolutely worth a visit.

02-23-18  08:11pm

Replies (8)
Review
94
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but a lot less tame.
Excellent production quality.
Excellent navigation.
Part of the Met Art Network so you know what to expect.
Terrific customer service.
Excellent download speeds
Multiple image size and video file formats
settable user options for navigation and viewing (like Met Art)
All sets are named and dated.
Cons: Really very few.
Marketing for the webcam partner is very prominent and the auto-dropdown for this is truly annoying.
They've starting this odd bait tactic called "Staff Selection", where they insert a preview video in prominent locations (it looks just like a set). You click on it and discover it is only a preview. Then they want to SELL you the video separately from your membership. The ad for the most recent video-for-sale shows up on every single set listing page. I truly hope this dies quickly. The videos are no different from other Met-Art network videos and this practice is so annoying that it makes me want to quit the site.
Many of the sex videos are highly stylized. (surreal as opposed to real)
Many of the solo models lose eye contact with the camera when they start getting into themselves.
Bottom Line: As a frame of reference, I am a very, very long term member of Met Art and a couple of other sites in the network, but I recently realized I have not been a member of Sex Art since 2012. I'm happy to say a lot has changed on this site since 2012!

The site uses the tagline "Erotoc Cinema for discerning adults" but there are far more image sets than there are videos. For me, that isn't a bad thing at all.

As others have said, this is Met Art, only harder. Here you will find nearly all of the models you would see at Met Art, except here the no touching, no fingering, no inserting, no spreading, and no boy-girl fucking rules are gone. Many of the models are still just solo, but they are much more open. Much.

Somebody mentioned back in 2013 or so that they were doing anal on this site. I did not notice any Anal scenes and a search for anal only brought up a few things from 2013. I don't really care for anal so this is a good thing on my list. Just so you know...no anal here.

If you are a Met-Art subscriber, have you ever clicked on a thumbnail because the image looked great only to find that the lower half of the model is completley out of focus? Well, that sort of depends on the photographer but I can tell you that here it doesn't happen nearly as much. Many of the images here are sharp from head to toe and every bit as good, sometimes better than those at Met Art.

The models, of course, are Met Art quality, top notch European models. Nearly all are in the 18 to 25 category. Generally slender, some are curvy and some are OMFG gorgeous. They seem a little more playful here with a little more eye contact. And when you throw in that these sets include a lot more shots of, for example, fingering, spreading and generally open labia, then this site becomes a lot more pleasant. Many of the girls do tend to forget about the camera when they start getting into themselves, though. This is fairly common for models that are not full-out porn stars.

The videos are sort of a mixed bag and I'm not entirely sure why. Met Art in general tends to stylize their videos and many of these are theme based. The sex in many of these videos is ok, but it doesn't draw you in and hold you like more hardcore stuff can. (There are some notable exceptions, though, where the guy just bangs the hell of the girl like there ar no cameras at all...and it is really good.) Some of the solo scenes are also very good, starting with a stroll down the beach or something and ending with a vibrator induced orgasm with a lot of close-ups along the way. Is it real? Who cares! It often looks pretty real! The girl/girl scenes are also much more realistic, with the girls clearly performing acts on eachother, as opposed to just holding hands and looking like they are sisters, again with an ample number of close-ups along the way.

Here are some quick stats (from what I can figure): As of 2/23/18
895 videos
1,259 photo sets
549 models
49 photographers/videographers

One new set every day.

As far as niche, that is difficult to define. I would put it in with Watch4Beauty.com or maybe MPLstudios as both of those sites use popular, beautiful Eauropean models and put no restrictions on activities.

Bottom line: If you like the models at Met Art but are looking for something a little more open, a little more exposed, a little harder, then this is the site you are looking for. I would say join for a month, but honestly, there is way too much good material here, so take a longer term deal if you can find it. I may add this to my annual subscription list.

02-23-18  05:56pm

Replies (0)
Reply
95
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

I'm assuming yoiu are talking about listing scenes on the tour pages, correct?

A listing of scenes or a count of scenes?

Some sites have a lot of scenes, so listing them in the tour section would be pretty difficult, although some sites are set up so you can see thumbnails of scenes/sets but not watch them.

To me, the number of scenes and the frequency of scene release are pretty important stats.

I really think you can get a read on whether a site is honest or not by looking at the preview pages and reading reviews. If the informatio nyou want to see about the site is not there, move on.


02-23-18  04:07pm

Reply
96
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I think most of the time the rule about topics at the diner table is SEX, politics and religion. Fortunately, PU covers the first item quite nicely. Facebook and Twitter seem to have a handle on the other two.

02-19-18  02:48pm

Reply
97
N/A Reply of Loki's Poll

Can we go macro for a minute? This is a great community, but sometimes there are bad players. PU has a "report" option in every thread but I'm guessing people don't use it very often. Like the "trust" ratings, there is also a potential for people to abuse the process "reporting" others who don't share their views on a particular site, etc.

PU members are a rare breed and it is refreshing being able to talk about so many un-PC things. I mean, just saying the letters BDSM in public these days is likely to get you arrested. (kidding...mostly.)

How do we develop a system where people are free to say what they want, but those who make particularly biased, racist or religously tainted comments are politely told that their comments are not appreciated? I honestly don't know.

Ultimately, like the Whopr discovered in the 80's movie War Games, perhaps the best way to win when people are trolling or presenting controvercial comments is NOT TO PLAY. Just don't respond to nonsense. If you do, you are only provoking more.


02-19-18  02:40pm

Comment
98
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)

Got a "Please come back" offer for $9.95....

Looks like these guys are sending out $9.95 offers to former members or to some list they got. I decided to re-join, but when I rejoined using the same info as before, I got some kind of "not eligible for offer" response. Interesting... When I tried it again and used a different email address, there was no problem. Goofy. It looks like there are some new micro sites but it also looks like a few other ones I wrote about before have stopped updating. I'll write a revised review within the next few weeks.

02-18-18  06:19pm

Replies (1)
Reply
99
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I'm talking solo girl sets here, mostly....

I've come to appreciate...particular poses that, for the most part, have become part of the formula for most solo girl sets on many sites. It really surprises and amazes me when sets in several popular sites omit them. I have so much stuff now that most sets that don't include those poses don't make it onto my hard drive.

The other thing that is an absolutel requirement, regardless of anything else, is model eye contact with the camera.


02-16-18  05:29pm

Reply
100
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of Onyx's Reply

Well, I've pulled down a couple and some are 3d and some are not. No logic to which is which since a few new ones are not. I have not had a chance to actually watch any of them iun VR yet. Will update when I do.

02-13-18  06:20pm


Shown : 76-100 of 598 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.