Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young attractive models.
Newer sites seem to have found a niche.
Newer video quality is good.
Site layout is pretty good.
Navigation is pretty good.
Videos are user scored on a 5 point scale.
Updates are dated.
Download speeds are OK.
Current sites are 1080p.
A few videos are 4k.
Cons:
Many older sites no longer update.
The newer sites are not BDSM sites, they are "Simulated Peril" sites. (Can we coin that phrase, maybe?)
Only 1 update a week across all sites.
HUGE video blocking watermarks on every video
Infuriating page load delays until you scroll down to view the next sections.
Images but NO ZIP FILES!
File resolutions and sizes not listed.
Video file naming could be better.
Repetitive nature of themes is unfortunate.
Very limited set and male actor variety.
OH. Cancellation process is worst on Internet!
Cancel fine print says you have to cancel at least 30 DAYS prior to next billing. That's nuts!
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying that my review is primarily about the dedicated, updating micro-sites in this "network".
When it comes to BDSM material, I think the gold standard is probably the Kink network. That network provides a lot of really raw, tie-the-girl-down-and-make-her-come-a-million-times true BDSM that is consensual but incredibly intense. Some of it is a bit too brutal for me, though, although it is clearly all consensual.
In the middle, I don't know, several sites where a model/actress is tied down and you can't quite tell if she is acting or not when the guy puts a vibrator to her clit. BBB comes to mind, but there is a moderate amount of acting there.
Then there are these "simulated peril" sites. The girl is tied up loosely or only has her hands tied together during sex, with a backstory that implies peril. Sites in this category include the main micro-sites here and those on the sister site punishteens.com. These sites may have popular models and porn stars, but the scenes are nowhere near as intense as scenes found on true BDSM sites. (The best of this simulated type that I ever saw was on the Hustler site. Guy breaks in and attacks the girl, girl gets a gun, girl makes guy seriously fuck her, then at the end the girl points the gun at him and after fade-to-black, shoots him. Awesome Karma!) Sorry, I digress, but it was best-of-genre and memorable.
All that said, there are 7 micro-sites here that I consider current and not a purchased collection.
They are: (scenes in p
Teen Creeper (8 )
Teens in the Woods (12)
Helpless Teens (42)
Brutal Casings (56)
Brutal Pickups (12. last update: 5/16) Sexual Disgrace (130. last update 8/16)
Strap-on Squad (60. last update 9/16)
Sexual Disgrace is a pretty good traditional dungeon-style BDSM site with a lot of content. Strap-on Squad is an all girl dungeon-style site. Both of these seem to be no longer be updating.
Note that there is 1, one, one, ONE primary male actor on all of the sites listed above, except Teen Creeper, and he is also often found on punishteens as well. He is a very, very busy guy.
There are also 11 "collection" sites that do not update, many of which are so old (i.e. 2011) as to be all medium to standard def. There are a total of about 1,130 videos in these collections. There is some true BDSM here and some good images.
Just in case you can't guess, here are the themes:
Teen Creeper: Break-in and forced sex. 1 or 2 girls. A few of these scenes are pretty good but all are nearly identical in format. This site uses a different male actor who is a good creeper.
Teens in the Woods: Girl(s) in the woods find their way to a house where a forest ranger serial rapist lives.
Helpless Teens: Stranded girls who need a ride do stuff in the front and the back of a van for that ride. Many get dragged back to a dungeon-like bed for additional sex.
Brutal Castings: Exactly as it sounds. Starts out nice, then the guy goes ape-shit on the girl, ties her hands and screws her.
Brutal pick-ups: Girl on a street gets pulled into an alley, hands tied and screwed.
They all sound pretty good, don't they? Well, although the first one of each of these that you watch will be entertaining (Ava Taylor in Brutal Castings, for example, or Gina Valentina in the first few minutes of Teen Creeper), they are all so similar that they quickly get boring. Add that the girls are usually not really tied up and are clearly just doing their usual porn acting stuff, complete with the usual porn sequences from blow job to money shot, and the whole thing goes pretty limp. Honestly, the best part of each scene is the moment when the guy "grabs" the girl and you can't quite tell if the initial reaction from the girl is acting or not. (That sounds really creepy, but, hey, that's why I joined!) The limited themes and settings, the repetition and the occasional re-use of an actress on different micro-sites, detracts from the overall entertainment value.
Overall, the sets are well done and well lit. The guy does a pretty good job of acting and the girls' acting varies. Video quality on these is good,although the actual video size is not consistent across all the sets. You don't know if "HD Hi" is 2K or 4K until you start the download and file sizes are not listed.
The newer sites have a frustrating "feature". When viewing the 4-8 sets on a page, the section of the page that is not visible does not load until you scroll down. So you spend a truly stupid amount of time waiting for the page to load as you scroll. This is unnervingly slow during peak internet hours. 4 to 8 sets per page? Why should I have to wait?
Oh, and there is no easy way to cancel.
Uh oh. Ran out of space. I would recommend this site to those who really like the simulated BDSM style, or for anyone looking for a bargain in older true BDSM. I downloaded what I wanted and will probably not be back
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons:
In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line:
I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.
This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.
It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.
Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.
The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.
Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.
No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...
Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.
So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the models are really beautiful
Most are at least good looking
Most are natural, not enhanced.
100% original content
Exclusive models as far as I can tell
Reasonable variety of body dimensions
Cons:
Well....
Sets are not dated.
Unknown update frequency.
Can't tell if sets are recycled.
No HD found so far
Images and zips are 1600x1067 MAX!!
Navigation is a little clunky
Site is mostly bathing suit and lingerie shots.
Models are not very animated (most just standing)
Softer than soft core...really a bikini site with extras.
Not a particularly good value at $29.95.
Bottom Line:
About 210 models and 1475 sets.
Very few videos but all are decent quality.
Sets have between 30 and 120 images.
Vast majority of sets are bikini/lingerie sets.
This is an odd, sort of misidentified site and I just can't understand why they didn't define it better. (Sorry TBP...) Probably 97% of the girls are NOT NUDE! This would be a classic tease or bikini site if it were not for the occasional nude set. Even the nude sets, most of them anyway, are not particularly revealing. I've seen more on the Chive, Maxim or free web sites. Much more. But then, oh wait, there are two or three models that get naked and provide extreme close-ups. Waaaat? What's THAT about? No wonder TBP had such a hard time defining the site. It's like the sock drawer of nude sites! Most things in there match up with a specific genre ou would expect, but rogue loners to make you wonder what's going on....
Maybe the next best way I can define this site, besides as a tease site, is outdated. Navigation is good but not ideal. You can filter the models by odd preferences like "wet" (as in water),"fishnet", "see-thru", "blond" and, oh yea, "nude" and even "extreme close up" which is just wierd compared to the rest of the site. You can't select multiples, so no way to see wet blonds, etc. And "see-thru" applies to a top worn over a bathing suit as often as something you can actually see parts through.
When you select a model, you get a list of her sets. The sets have tags like "fishnet", bathing suit", "nude", etc. that match the search parameters. These are site defined. Select a set and you get the first batch of 30 thumbnails. If there is nudity, it is often very late in the set. Some sets have over 300 images, so you have to go through 10 pages or more to see everything. You can also navigate directly to a page. Or you can download the entire set in a zip file.
The sets are not dated, so you have no idea how old they are. You also don't know how many images are in a set until you look. The image or file sizes are also not listed. The tags are helpful, but "nude" in this case might mean a nip slip. Ad if the model is nude, chances are pretty good that they superglued her legs together. Many of the girls that are nude are all crossed up like they have to pee! Some are only topless. One kind of interesting thing is that the girls may go nude but cover up everything with thier hands....until they turn around. That all of a sudden you'll get this beautiful standing rear view. The photographer seems to have a knack for these rearview shots as they occur pretty consistently in clothed and nude models.
Oh, yeah. The photography. Competent. Nothing special. No photoshopping. Some studio sets. Since most of the girls are clothed, it looks like the photographer often takes the models to a local hotel pool or maybe some gardens someplace. You can tell that many of the model sets were shot on the same day with the same locale. Nothing even remotely exotic in the locations.
Now if you are LOOKING for a bikini site, this one is probably not bad, but the occasional rogue naked close-up model kind of messes up that niche.
If this were my site, I would probably break it up into a "network" of three sites that might include bikini, lingere and nude sites. The price I paid, $29.00 was probably about $10.00-15.00 high considering comparable sites with tens of thousands of high-resolution images and HD videos.
Bottom line? If you are looking for some exclusve non-nude photography and don't mind a little nudity mixed in, this is a good site for you. If you are used to the top softcore sites, pass on this one...at least until the price comes down.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Least expensive "VR" site on the net! ($9 a month!)(See below for why...)
Relatively large collection
Huge variety (B/G, G/G, BDSM, shemale, fetish
Full 360 degree videos
Many observational boy/girl sex scenes
File size are smaller because sets are short
The video player on the web page displays flat video. (because the videos themselves are not 3 D)
Cons:
Videos are 360 but NOT 3D! (i.e not 2 channel)
Video quality is not up to the standards of most other sites. (not a byproduct of the 360 view)
Most videos are not participatory
Many observational boy/girl sex scenes
Downloads are slow
File downloads are COMPRESSED in RAR format??!!
Sets are generally less than 10 minutes
The video player on the web page is a little slow.
No release dates or scoring
No index
odd 90 second pause when watching videos on site
Bottom Line:
This site has made it onto a few top 10 or top 20 VR website lists so I went to check it out. For $9 a month, how could I resist? .....$9 a month!!! The site is a collection of over 100 360 degree VR videos with a very wide variety of genres including solo, straight, lesbian, BDSM, etc. The down side is that the vast majority of the videos are NOT participatory, meaning you just watch and sometimes it is from a considerable distance.
Some specs:
120+ Videos
Videos are NOT 3D (only a single channel)
Most videos are high resolution
No dates or scoring
No models that I recognize (Alexa Nasha?)
When streaming, there is an odd 90 second pause before videos start playing. This is probably supposed to allow you to get set up with your VR in streaming mode, but if you are just wanting to see what the video is about, it is pretty annoying. It may also be some kind of process that turns the 360 degree video flat, but I'm not sure. I would MUCH prefer that the video start and just press pause if I'm streaming.
The lack of stereo 3D shooting is not immediately apparent with a headset on, but ultimately it is the downfall of these videos and probably this site. It IS possible to watch and enjoy these videos without 3D, but it is essentially like watching any flat video with your headset. This is why others say this site is not as immersive as some others.
The 360 view is interesting, but only a few videos really take advantage of it. Most of the time what is behind you is a wall or something else that you would expect to be behind you. A few videos have multiple girls masturbating or having sex with others in different corners, so you have to turn to face them.
Many of these videos seem to have been shot with a head mounted 360 rig. So the perspective is slightly higher than eye level and you can see the observers (your) body with a portion masked off with a graphic. The graphic is a little distracting, but I'm not sure what other options there would be.
The Download files are compressed in RAR format. In the several decades I've been downloading things, I've never seen that and actually had to pull out an old program to decompress the files. Once decompressed, the actual video is almost exactly the same size as the compressed file (because, of course, MP4 already compressed the file.) I'm not sure I understand why the webmasters do this since it doesn't really reduce download speed and is a royal pain in the ass to decompress.
Bottom line: The site is 360 but not 3D, which means it is not really a VR site...it is something....but slightly less than VR. Still for $9 a months, you are likely to find something here that interests you and that is a LOT less than many other sites with significantly less content.
I scored the site primarily based on the lack of 3D video. If these videos had been 3D, the site would have scored in the high 70s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looks like there are about 1500 videos
Videos date back to 2004
Good quality streaming videos
Many popular US porn stars here. Many!
Some of the videos are quite good
All videos are dated
Cons:
Videos are STREAMING ONLY
Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH.
Navigation is pretty basic
Navigation is frustratingly slow
Scenarios can be a little monotonous.
Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud.
Bottom Line:
Not sure what to say about this site....
I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.)
I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing).
But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something.
There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems.
Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But...
The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room...
The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress.
There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough.
My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed.
I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch.
The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like?
OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep.
Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few recent videos are pretty good
Layout is OK
Navigation is straightforward (28 pages, 24 videos per page) and consistent.
Choose your own PW and it can be saved for future logins. (There is a very easy captcha at login.)
Cons:
One new video per week
Seems like a lot of 3rd party stuff
Many more recent Japanese videos are Pixelated
Only HD since about 2013
All HD videos are 720p
Videos are average quality
Many videos are non-nude
No photos
Only one video format per set
Older videos do not stream and must be downloaded
No video details
No model details
No search
Many, many broken videos in the bonus sites
Nobody seems to be enjoying themselves.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site because the previews show very flexible, relatively fit looking women, which happens to be a niche I like a lot. But the site was a pretty big disappointment as the updates are only weekly and the video quality is generally pretty bad. There are a few pretty good videos, but you really, really have to look for them.
Here are some stats:
Site has been open since 2004.
1 update a week
672 videos.
NO images.
HD videos began in 2013 (about 150)
About 60 HD videos (2013-present) are Japanese and pixelated due to Japanese porn laws.
The models are a mixed bag of mostly eastern Europeans with some western girls and the aforementioned Japanese videos. There are very few memorable/savable girls in the entire collection, which took me about an hour to go through. This is the only site where "flexible" does not always equate to fit. I now know that even the plumpest girls can lift their legs over their heads. That's not something I ever really wanted to know...or see.
Each video provides just two options: Watch or download. The older videos will not play in Chrome or IE11 and MUST be downloaded, which means you will be downloading, watching and deleting a lot of videos. Fortunately, they only take a few seconds to download because they are small. A large number of bonus videos are broken and
The video sets are broken down into 3 or 4 videos/segments for each shooting of each model. So, since they release one new video a week, it takes a month to get one complete video shoot.
Sometimes they are sequential, sometimes not.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this site is that although the girls are flexible, and a few are even attractive, the video and choreography is so poorly done that it really feels like a couple of horny middle school kids filmed their older brother's girlfriend. The videos are are not stable, not framed well, not focused and rarely positioned in an appropriate way. The girls rarely look at the camera, rarely pause in open positions and only a few recent videos actually provide an unobstructed view of things while the girls are flexing. Most of the sets have a video of the girl flexing while clothed, flexing while partially clothed, flexing naked from the side or back (not showy), then BAM some guy shows up and, without the slightest hesitation of foreplay, starts fucking them. The sex is not particularly good and the girls are either clearly not enjoying it or making faces that are the worst porn orgasm faces on the planet. These videos could have been so much better! All they needed to do was slow down, let the girls enjoy themselves a little and showcase the natural talent from rarely seen angles for a few minutes.
Before I forget, the site uses a couple of different charge providers. Make sure you get one you trust like Epoch as it is easy to cancel through them. I tried to cancel through the cancel page on the website and they were unable to find my account. Fortunately, I found it immediately on the epoch site and cancelled it there.
Now, to be fair, the site advertises free access to a bunch of other sites in their network, which is called "Extreme Movie Pass". I found these sites, at least the ones I ventured into, to be about the same or a little worse than Amateur18. These sites have names like EXGF Sexxx, Crazy Monster Cock, Crazy Beauties, Crazy Old Moms, Big Breast, Asian Hot Bunnies, Rubber Babes, Nylon Worlds (sic), Extreme Tranny Movies and many more. One, called Flexidolls.com, is both interesting and creepy. Each video starts with a guy taking a girl out of a box, a suitcase or a closet like she is one of those real girl dolls. He then poses her in an impossible looking position and immediately proceeds to do something to her with a dildo or his dick. The entire time, the girl has a totally blank expression and is staring into space because, you know, she's supposed to be a doll. I recall that most credit card servicers will not allow site videos to simulate drugging a woman in any way. These are as close to a "play with an unconscious girl" videos as they can get away with, I guess. Meh....
In general, all of the other sites are mostly standard def and fair-to-poor videos. Many videos are broken.
Bottom line: At $30 a month, this site is not really worth it when you compare it to all of the other top-quality sites out there. It might be worth it for a month at $20, though. with all of the bizarre other sites that comes with it, there might be something you like but there almost certainly will not be much of it and you will have to sift through a lot of junk. Be careful about cross-checks when you sign up and be sure to use a known service provider. I've put about three hours into looking at ALL of the content on this site and most of the network sites that look interesting. I will almost certainly never be back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Decent quality videos
All seem to be in HD
Several download options
Some attractive girls
Cons:
60 TOTAL videos (August 2016)
Site is extremely slow
No preview photos
Can't view photos, just download them.
Teaser photo rarely reflects the scene
Scenes are so contrived as to be laughable
No model listings
No search
ONE New set every week or two
Bottom Line:
I'm just going to try to write a quick one for this site because, frankly, that's all there is to write about.
60 scenes.
Each scene has a screenshot photo set
Extremely slow navigation
No model credits or search
60 sets.
The only reason this site exists is because it advertises as a "punishment" site. It isn't really a punishment site and isn't really a "play" punishment site because the scenes are not set up to depict playful punishment or any kind of real bondage. The images they use for the teasers are rarely representative of the sets. That teaser advertising video you see every place where the girl is getting abused by a bunch of guys? It is in fast motion and I can't seem to find it on the site.
60 sets.
What I was hoping for was some kind of bedroom bondage or playful punishment site. This is neither because it tries to be much more serious than it is. The images show girls tied up in what could be fun for both partners. Then the videos makes it out like the girl is being punished for writing about another guy or doing something that the guy didn't like. But throughout the scene the girl isn't tied down and clearly has to be in control of things to have sex. She looks like she's upset, but it is usually pretty bad acting. In the meantime, the guy is yelling at her like he's teaching her some kind of lesson. Lame.
60 sets.
There are a couple of sets that look pretty interesting at first, like a wax-play set where the girl is tied down and looks like she is enjoying herself. He leaves her hands tied to the bed and gives it to her, then there is a fairly ordinary, not particularly memorable traditional sex scene...well, except that they guy is fairly aggressive...like he is in most sets. I remember that.
Perhaps this is the most compelling argument why you might want to skip this site. The highest member-rated score on the entire site is 95%. Only 8 of the scenes on the site rank 90% or higher. Translation: a lot of people who paid to join the site do not believe the material is first rate....because it isn't.
The guys who run this site and/or direct these sets seem to be trying pretty hard to make this work and they aren't doing a bad job considering the limited resources they must have. But in this day of kink.com and hogtied dominating the BDSM scene, they need to adjust either their name or their format a little to avoid misleading a lot of users. It looks like they've tried several different things in an effort to find a niche, but they have not really found it yet.
Bottom line: You might like this site if you like the fake interview sites or other fake B&D sites. The price is cheap, but there are some slightly better sites in this genre.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Newer videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or really poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
Image downloads in one size (medium or small)
Many videos are SD
No model pages or search.
Site layout and design is ancient.
Bottom Line:
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of Passion-HD network.
Young, popular attractive models
Good quality videos
zipped images from video sets
Cons:
Very small site
Many downloads are broken. (now fixed)
Very slow download speeds (compared to other sites in the network).
No support.
Not already included in Passion-HD platinum Pass.
Watermarks on videos and especially images are HUGE and very distracting.
Ever watch a silent movie and see all the exaggerated facial expressions? Lots of that, especially in the images.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Passion-HD network, but like a lot of the sites in that network, it is marketed separately and there is no indication from the preview or sign-up screen that it is part of the same network. Once you are a member of any site within the network, Baeb.com is part of the $69 Platinum Pass if you purchase it now, but is not included if you already own the pass, as I do. Pure money grab.
Details:
15 videos as of 4/1/17
Good quality but several were broken (fixed)
Videos are scored 1-10 stars
Videos are dated
Model index
Photo sets and zip with mid-size images
Several of the videos were broken when I first downloaded them, failing about 1/2 to 3/4 of the way through when played. The downloads complete. The vids do not. I think this has been resolved but it is an odd issue.
When I tried to contact support about the download issue, the ticket system did not work. It kept asking me to put a name into the name field even though I already had. Giving up on submitting a ticket, I tried again to download the videos a few days later and they now appear to work.
The format of these videos is exactly the same as Passion-HD with the exception of a little less POV (no top-down or cowboy POV). This is all straight sex as far as I can tell. No anal or fetish. I think the logic behind this site is that it is supposed to be an actress showcase rather than a niche site. Not sure, though.
Bottom line: I can't recommend this site by itself due to the small collection size, broken videos, slow downloads and lack of support. Passion-HD is a much better value. Look for a deal on one of the sites (Including this one, which I saw advertised for $14 someplace) in the network and then consider forking out the $69 to get permanent access to all of the sites (That access is for as long as you maintain the original membership.) The network membership should then include this site.
From the site format, this might be a bait site.
Really small collection (23 videos)
Ultra basic navigation
Section called VR VOD where other vids are $10 each. Nice try. I'll wait for VR chat rooms.
No update schedule
Videos are not dated
Videos are not scored.
No search function
No model listing.
Bottom Line:
As VR sites go, this is a really small one, but the VR and actress quality is not bad.
This site is owned by the same group that owns Naughty America. That site includes VR but the actresses used are mature, established porn stars. From what I can tell, in an effort to generate more revenue, they separated out the "teen" VR from the mainstream stuff you can get at Naughty America and created this site. Kudos to those folks because people like me will join this site, even if it is only for a month....or for the few hours it takes to pull down every video on this site. What I really don't like, and am going to score accordingly for, is that the site creators went a little too far and created what appears to be a bait site. A bait site is a site designed to attract subscriptions with no clear intentions of maintaining the site beyond a certain point or providing ongoing, regular updates for the subscribers. Yes, this site has some good quality VR videos of young actresses, as advertised, but there is no clear indication of how often, if at all, the site is or has been updated and the site could very easily have just been created to suck money out of people looking for teen VR. A legitimate site lists release dates. A legitimate site provides regular updates. A legitimate site does not include a "store" selling 50 additional VR videos not shown on the site for $10 each. 50 additional VR videos! Ten...Dollars...Each!? And I'm not even counting the ubiquitous ads to join Naughty America with a single click. To be fair, these might all be oversights on the part of the webmasters, but they are huge, glaring, troubling oversights.
Real Teen VR Stats:
23 videos.
23 models (all single girl sets)
One fairly representative image per set
No zips or screencaps
Videos are not dated
No indication of new release frequency
Videos available in most VR formats.
File sizes are not listed.
These are actually pretty good VR videos. They are shot in the exact same style as the VR videos at Naughty America, probably because they are the same company and these videos were originally slated to go there. I did a review of the VR at Naughty America VR and many of those points apply here.
All videos are VR viewer participatory (i.e. you fuck her)
Most videos start (with you) prone and end up actively upright.
The Actresses are a little too talkative.
Some videos have drop-outs and/or abrupt transitions that hinder the VR experience.
The models are 18-19. Although youth is beauty in today's society, several of these girls are young but not beautiful.
Bottom line: Mixed. For $20, it is probably an acceptable site to visit for one month just to pull down the 23 videos. But the site appears to be a bait site designed specifically to get your money for those videos and never provide anything more.
If you are the webmaster for this site, feel free to prove me wrong by providing past release dates, upcoming release schedules and regular updates to the site. I will gladly change my review and score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Videos are available in a variety of formats including HD. Models are generally very attractive. A few well known models.
Cons:
The advertising seems a little deceptive. There are only about 120 videos on the site, with Videos dating back only to November of 2011. That would be 1-3 videos a week since inception. Videos rarely depict the same imagery as the teaser images they are linked to (in any quantity at least..10 minute video, 5 seconds of a particular angle or shot and that's what they tease you with.).
Bottom Line:
Nope, sorry. Stay away from this one until it gets a LOT more content and they tweak the formule a bit. The advertising showing slick scenes, awesome couples or groups and amazing "first person" angles does not really reflect what is on the site.
This site includes some Porn Pro-like footage with the objective of selling it in more of an X-Art.com format. It almost works, but very, very little of the material is...artsy enough to pull it off and only a few of the participants look like they are enjoying themselves or their partners. Look at the images depicting the scenes and you think holy crap this is going to be hot! What you get when you watch are a lot of OK, moderaately dissapointing sex scenes in very similar bright white settings with entirely too much footage from the same angle (across the bed on the side). It is almost clinical! Several of the videos look like they take place in the same rented villa in Arizona or California someplace. When there are several videos of the same girl, they are all pretty clearly from the same day no matter how hard they try to change things up. And much of the sex, which should be OMG hot, ends up looking like acting...mediocre acting...not that the industry has any really great acting, but the couples should at least be into each other.
There are a few models you would recognize; Zoey and Jessie, for example. I have NEVER seen Jessie or Zoey, two young, vibrant, energetic and attractive models, not entirely enjoying themselves...except here. Here the sex looks like work. (Jessie has a scene where 90% of the time she is getting screwed on a piano bench with her head slamming against a baby grand piano. That So did not look comfortable or fun!)
I rarely find a site that I can't recommend. Unfortunately, I can't recommend this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good selection of videos.
Many different sources.
Amateur and pro material.
Preview images provided
Cons:
Site is a pay-per-download marketing venue for other VR sites.
NO original material
VERY SLOW download speeds
Frequent download failures
Bottom Line:
This is one of a growing number of pay-per-download sites. Downloads average about $10 each and come from various other sites that are seeking additional ways to get their videos seen and/or are looking for extra revenue.
In this new age of unlimited downloads, I don't really approve of this type of site, but there are a few that provide independent material on behalf of their clients. This site is NOT one of those sites. This site resells videos that are otherwise available from other websites. They make a few bucks for distribution, the author-site makes a few bucks in roylaties and they also get their name out there. Unfortunately, what these author-sites don't realize is that it is far too easy to provide a negative impression when a pay-per-download site does a poor job like this one does. My impression of Badoink, for example, is somewhat worse than it was when I wrote a review on them last month.
Bottom line? Considering that 3 downloads here equals a one month subscription to most sites, check to see the SOURCE of the video you are purchasing and go there to see if simply subscribing to the site would be a better option. If the content-source site looks like a better deal, sign up! If not, go ahead and download it here but be prepared to wait longer than you should for it to download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Some videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
No model pages.
Bottom Line:
I saw a couple of sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. I went ahead and did this in spite of there being no reviews for the site. here on PU. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log along the left side that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com instead of naked-gymnast. On a hunch, I went to Flexyteens.com, which has a very nice looking front entrance, and signed in my Naked-Gymnast login. Surprise! I got the exact same site, except at the top it now said "Flexy Teens"! So I will be dropping this review there also. I would be so pissed if I had signed up for the same site under two different names. Fortunately, I did not.
The models are typically young, but there is a general lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are just strange, neither gymnastic nor flexy. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but this site is not worth visiting by itself.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some nicely done videos
Some great looking models
Decent collection
Cons:
This is actually a referral site.
All or most of the content is from third party libraries or sites getting referrals.
Site layout and navigation is inconsistent and generally awful.
Preview page is not representative of content
Preview page makes many models look under 18 (scary)
Update 3 times a week, maybe.
Cross selling on every page. (From the sites with the content)
Bottom Line:
I've reviewed a pretty significant number of websites, So I hope the PU webmasters understand that as the consumer reports of porn, they need to watch out for misrepresentation.
At first, this seems like one of those sites that is trying to model itself in the image of WOW or W4B. The recent videos, though not exclusive, are very nicely done and follow that genre.
There is a section called DVD movies. Click on it and you are taken to an area with commercial streaming DVDs. It is a really poorly implemented area, though, because each video includes an option for HD, but generates an error when you click on HD. These are mostly old DVD from before 2008 or so, probably from a commercial re-licenser/aggregator.
Then, as you navigate through the site, there is also a large collection of videos that generally remind me of the stuff you can find on RedTube or other free sites. It is not bad, but I've seen much of it elsewhere. Funny thing...once there, you can't get back to the main page. This is because you are no longer on 18X. You are actually on a different site called Webmaster central. Another content aggregator. Another funny thing. Many of the videos have the lower corner blurred out or have been cropped to eliminate a watermark. This is probably because the aggregator bought the rights to these videos from sites that no longer exist.
But here is where the really sleazy website garbage comes in...stuff this site deserves to get slammed for. The Thai girl on the preview page named Eaw is not on the site. She can only be found by clicking on the "tour videos" link at the top. "tour videos" interesting description. I'm thinking it really means "Browse videos".... Ah, there she is, 2nd one down. Click on it, and up comes a video of the girl and some screen shots along with "click here for more" So I click on it and....What the fuck?...I'm redirected to a site called "Thai Girls Wild" and invited to join! Are you f-ing kidding me!!?? There below Eaw is a nearly famous picture of the beautiful Melena from Met-Art, also on the preview page. I follow the link and, BAM, it actually takes me to a Met-Art sign-up page! The girl on the top of the page, named Alyssa Hart here, is actually a referral to a site called Petite18.com.
Wow, so I've paid to see models from the preview page who are actually not on this site at all except for a few images and one video that are REALLY on sites that are paying this site for referrals. NOPE! NOPE! NOPE! DON'T DO THAT! IT IS AMONG THE MOST DECEPTIVE THINGS A PORN SITE CAN DO!
So...bottom line? Well, as far as I can tell, there is either no or very little original content on this site. It is an aggregation of libraries and referral agreements that provide content from other sites. And in addition to that, the site is deceptively advertising models on its preview page that are actually bait images for referrals to other sites.
As unlikely as I think this is,it is entirely possible that the webmasters of this site do have some unique content, are trying to create something and are only a referral site while they build up their collection. If that is the case, I apologize. However, you are deceiving people and my score reflects my disgust for this kind of deception.
I have never had to say this in a review before, but STAY FAR AWAY FROM THIS SITE!
Most of the sets are older...and NOT exclusive but still very good
Looking around for something different, I saw this site on TBP and decided to give it a try. It is a high-glam solo or girl/girl site shot in the style of the late J. Stephen Hicks (Digital Desire, DDF, Babes.com, etc.) with mostly US porn stars. Unfortunately, it looks like the site is either recycling older material or is purchasing/sharing material from other sites. A few of the models with recent sets (Kayden Cross) have been retired for years and I have found at least several dozen sets that are not exclusive. New sets come out about every 3 days but I can't tell how much material is recycled. Image and video quality are excellent. Lots of insertion, spreading, eye-contact,etc. There are a few nice sets of amazing models that I have not seen elsewhere, like Lily Ivy and Uma Jolie and some newer sets of current pornstars. Overall, absolutely worth a one-month visit, but if you are a seasoned collector, you will have seen a few sets before.
I just rejoined this site and am really annoyed at how slow the downloads are. First download takes an hour and forget about queuing any other downloads up because they have a throttle allowing only one download at a time. Several times I queued up multiple downloads and only got the SBVR intro in the file and nothing else. The video quality is good and the girls are hot but the download issues are a deal killer for me.
Got an email yesterday that said ccBill accounts were being transferred because of the sale of Femjoy to Gamma. My annual subscription immediately stopped working. A chat with support didn't help other than they said the issue should be resolved in a day or two. I truly hope this isn't the beginning of the end for Femjoy.
I recently rejoined Joymii and it now seems seems to be for 100% non-downloading mobile users. Navigation is big-button easy until you want to download, say, individual images. To do this, as far as I can tell, you go to the thumbnail images in a set, click on an image, SCALE IT TO THE SIZE YOU WANT on a sliding scale-bar, guessing you got the size you want, then right click to download that image. Yes, you can download a whole set via a zip file, but I no longer download whole sets. Oh, and in Chrome, once you open an image, there are no visible buttons to navigate back (they are there but hidden). I am a long time annual subscriber to Femjoy, but this site is just too messed up, navigation-wise. Oh, and if that isn't bad enough, when I went to complain on the contact page (using both Chrome and IE), the SUBMIT BUTTON DOESN'T WORK!! What a cluster!
Several Porn stars have committed suicide (i.e. Savannah, August Ames). They were probably disturbed enough by their profession and situation to take thier lives. This really bothers me and I have deleted any material I had of them.
I have been an annual W4B subscriber for many years and have rated the site very highly. Well, they have slowly been pushing users to the "new mobile" site, so I switched over to it. BIG MISTAKE! Apparently, they think mobile users don't want to save images. You can't download ANYTHING from the mobile interface. You have to switch back to the old interface, which is sometimes days behind in terms of updates. Now, there are updates on the "new" mobile site that don't even appear on the "old" site, so you can't download those images or videos at all. Am I missing something? No, but W4B has. People want to download. I don't care how good the sets are, if I can't download the images I want, I will not remain as a member and will no longer give favorable reviews. If you download any images, you need to avoid this site until they fix the interface issues.
There are a few pornstars that have committed suicide but many sites continue to show their material. I can't really watch their stuff and haev a hard time understanding why the sites keep it.
My tastes range from 18 to 30-ish but I think it is also about the look of the model and whatever mood I'm in. For example, Femjoy has a potographer named Stefan Soell that takes very conservative images of OMFG beautiful women in their 20s. But there are also some a-MAZ-ingly beautiful tattoo covered women on Suicide Girls and some great 1st-person sex on POVD and the VR sites. The only category I am not that fond of is the traditional, more mature US porn stars and sites.
I got a "not trusted" vote by another reviewer because he did not agree with my review of one of his favorite sites. The no-trust was anonymous, but it could only have been one person as he also wrote a rebuttal to my review to the site flexy teens. He wrote "Inaccurate reviews" in the no trust comment. I even went back to the site and double checked everything I had said to make sure I wasn't misrepresenting it. (It was and I wasn't.) I responded to the rebuttal and responded to the no trust vote. Never heard from the guy again and as far as I can tell, he doesn't come to PU anymore.
The other factor is that any legitimate reviewer getting a no-trust rating has the potential to be discouraged and annoyed with the PU site. I can say that personally, I have been much less interested in writing reviews since this anonymous douchebag no-trusted me in January of 2018. I think everyone has a right to disagree, but a no-trust mark is permanent, universal and..can it even be reversed? That's just wrong.
I know I took this too personally, but as a top-20 reviewer who takes pride in my reviews, I really feel like that was a kick in the nuts. PU could have a better system. Other review/comment systems use thumbs up/thumbs down at the review level, with cumulate votes and the option to report. That seems to be much more fair.
I replied to Ladylover below, but I didn't want this to get lost in the responses. The $99 lifetime membership is a sleazy cash grab. I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features (like the ability to download ANYTHING and actual HD videos), you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
I also just got a promotion for the $99 lifetime memership. Does anyone know if this is streaming only or if it includes downloads and HD? Even if it only lasts for two years, this seems like a decent deal, but not if it will cost me another $10 a month to be able to download anything.
Update: I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features, you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
