| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes always - I want to know as much about a site as I can. Obviously archived reviews won't be current, so I keep that in mind, but in my experiences sites rarely change all that much in their basic style and ethos and an archived review might contain some useful info the authors of new reviews miss out on.
Obviously if a newer review mentions something has changed since then I'll take note.
|
05-05-13 09:54am
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll do some further research on this, you've given me a good explanation to understand the basics of it, which I appreciate,
|
05-04-13 02:37pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Novels and books, I love reading. I'm holding out against eReaders too - I can see the advantages but I am old-fashioned in many ways and I just prefer physical books.
|
05-03-13 04:02am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Oh dear, I didn't even know there was such a thing!
I am a bit cautious though - I used an Ad Blocker once which was wonderfully effective, but also stopped things I wanted without me realising. For example, I use cashback sites whereby if you do your online shopping via their site, you get cashback on your purchases.
Suddenly my purchases stopped tracking and I couldn't figure out why until I guessed it might me that - when I turned it off, the problem went away.
So I tend to live with the ads now.
I suspect a Script blocker might do similiar stuff?
|
05-02-13 02:53pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think my browser (Firefox) comes with one as standard. It seems to block 99% of pop-ups, but one or two porn sites defeat it (that "Live Jasmine" one seems best at by-passing it).
The only non-porn site which seems able to defeat it is TripAdvisor, which always manages to sneak a pop-under past it!
|
05-02-13 10:30am
|
Reply
131
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Comment
Not doubting you at all, but that is a very unusual arrangement for a site - usually they charge you more for the first month and then it reduces if you stay a member to reward your loyalty.
With this site, it makes no sense to remain a member - it would be better to cancel your membership at the end of the first month and then rejoin!
|
04-30-13 02:28am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot for me please... looks odd if they're otherwise naked to be wearing anything on their feet.
|
04-29-13 01:42am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've put "other" because I'd say the majority of the time I've had a good fast response, occasionally I don't. Depends on the site, but most are OK.
It tends to help if you join well-regarded sites using sites like PU as a guide of course.
|
04-27-13 03:35am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
None of them... and I had to Google "hackey sack"! I voted for that though because it looks kinda fun!
|
04-23-13 03:21pm
|
Reply
135
|
Twink BF Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
mikala's Review
Hey mate good to see a review from you, we need more gay reviewers on this site. Welcome to my Trust List!
|
04-23-13 03:01pm
|
Reply
136
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
Welcome to the site! Sorry about your bad experience with this site but I hope you'll stick around - it's always good to warn your fellow users against sites like this that would rip us off - I HATE site which don't respond to support e-mails!
|
04-22-13 04:52pm
|
Reply
137
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Shame the site isn't up to standard - I admire the lady for still being active in her sixties!
|
04-22-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Much the same as now I think. I can't see them trying to tighten them up in most countries as it's largely fruitless, but I can't see them taking the time and effort to make them more relaxed either - generally unless there's a big demand for something these things get ignored.
If existing laws are unenforceable they tend to just leave them on the books and pretend they're not there!
|
04-21-13 05:29am
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, as long as it uses a trustworthy biller and there looks to be good content.
If I liked the content it would be a shame there's no more to come, but it's still there to enjoy what there is.
|
04-19-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Sometimes I'll take the plunge - I'd be cautious but if the preview is really good it's hard to resist sometimes.
If the site is new then it's understandable if there's no reviews, but if it's an older site I'd be more suspicious I guess.
I have submitted a few sites to TBP/PU and nominated them for reviews... but ultimately the first review has to come from someone - I've benefited from reviews from others so I have to return the favour!
|
04-17-13 04:42pm
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like to see flaws - all humans have them! I hate porn which is over-produced and seems airbrushed - to me the sexiness of porn is in its gritty reality. I want to see real people having passionate sex, not flawless models worrying about camera angles and their best side!
|
04-15-13 12:15pm
|
Reply
142
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thank you!!
I'll give it some serious thought! Really appreciate you going to so much trouble to help me.
|
04-15-13 12:13pm
|
Reply
143
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Hey thanks for the advice. I was put off using VPNs though as I read that using them to access websites where you needed passwords and especially credit card details was unsafe, as some of them are disreputable and can access the details you transmit over the VPN?
I also tried a few free ones to try and access regular US TV content and most of them didn't seem to work - the content was still blocked for me.
Also I thought as soon as they get by credit card details they'll be able to figure out it's a UK-based card and block me anyway.
Any advice? I've had credit card fraud twice in the past so extra cautious about this stuff.
|
04-15-13 09:22am
|
Comment
144
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
|
04-13-13 11:05am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
145
|
Dads I'd Like To Fuck
(0)
|
|
04-13-13 11:03am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not my cup of tea, never seen the appeal.
It's actually quite rare in gay porn - bit of a niche I guess.
|
04-13-13 08:05am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I suppose quality of the videos and the freqency of updates. I don't care about pictures.
They basically have to show me enough of a preview to give me a "feel" for the site and leave me wanting more!
|
04-12-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's an excellent point Jay G - I too have often found the most expensive sites are disappointing. It's certainly no guarantee of quality - but I'd never really thought about why. Your explanation make a whole lot of sense!
|
04-09-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, always.
It's a part of the whole package after all, you can't ignore it in your overall rating in my opinion. If two sites are identical in quality but one costs double the other, then it would seem odd to give them an equal score to me.
|
04-09-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
150
|
Juicy Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
Rockhardslc's Reply
Thanks dude and welcome to the site! Always great to have users of gay sites here, as we're pretty thin on the ground.
I hope you check out the site and stick around - maybe write some reviews of your own?
|
04-08-13 08:15pm
|
