| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
76
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
03-26-12 07:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
77
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Darn.
Up until now I've only been able to find the twitter pic she posted.
Didn't seem too bad but she was wearing a bra.
|
03-26-12 06:50am
|
Reply
78
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Reply
Yeah, figured as much. Loved the live shows though.
Thank you for the info, much appreciated!
|
03-26-12 06:41am
|
Reply
79
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Great review!
Could you tell us if they may have started with the live shows again?
After they cut that off I canceled my subscription.
I heard they did some tests with new live shows at some point but I wonder if they're back for good now.
|
03-25-12 08:30am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really depends on the site for me.
If the site doesn't have enough content to justify a subscription renewal but it a special niche I'm interested in, I might just download the whole thing to enjoy for a couple of months before getting a new subscription to get the latest videos.
Otherwise, no. Unless the video is really big and the download via browser is too slow.
|
03-25-12 08:27am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I use Google as my private tour guide usually.
Though it might be somewhat frowned upon, I do use video streaming services to preview a site before getting a subscription.
If I can't find anything, I go by the tour pages. If there are any.
If it's too polished it's usually (pardon my French) crap on the inside. If it looks like crap in the tour and shows there might not be a whole lot of content, it's probably crap on the inside as well.
I look for something in the middle usually.
|
03-25-12 08:14am
|
Reply
82
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Really? Think I missed that.
What has been done?
|
03-19-12 07:03am
|
Reply
83
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
True. But she's not as spoiled as many others out there.
Just give it time ;)
|
03-17-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I think it's helpful.
It shows if the site has made any changes since the last review.
Sorta.
|
03-17-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Really depends on the new sites or content I will encounter ;)
|
03-17-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
86
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Spot on review, CT!
Especially the fact it's repetitive.
Great site but it does get boring sometimes.
|
03-17-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
87
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review! :)
However, I did cancel my subscription a while ago when they stopped doing actual public videos.
The uncontrolled environment is what makes public/exhibitionistic videos appealing.
Also, when they added a woman to dominate a the model, I lost interest. As did many others.
Nonetheless, great review!
|
03-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I voted Fetishes as I think there should be more specific fetish sites. It's probably a bit too personal to specify the fetishes I would be interested in that aren't really available in large quantities yet.
Though it was more of a tie between Fetishes and Solo
|
03-13-12 02:50pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Low bandwidth and poor quality are the the top of my list.
But if a network site offers pretty much the same as the other sites which are tied to the network just in a different setting or with different people, I tend to walk away from that.
So, exclusivity and individuality makes for a good site in my opinion. Which doesn't necessarily mean a website can't be tied to a network, of course.
|
03-09-12 04:50am
|
Comment
90
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
|
03-09-12 04:47am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
91
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
I agree, good review!
I like how you appreciate yet dislike the fact they went to midcore.
But is the new photographer better or worse in terms of shooting a model?
Thank you for the heads up on the changes!
|
03-09-12 04:36am
|
Reply
92
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Again, Cybertoad, great review!
Though I was left to wonder if the videos offered are exclusive or not.
Too bad they don't allow download managers, really.
|
03-09-12 04:31am
|
Reply
93
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
The fact that someone else recently did a review on the same site shouldn't keep you from doing your own review, so kudos! :)
If the same problems are addressed is multiple reviews, maybe the site owners will start to notice and perhaps think about changing.
But what is even better is when someone reads multiple reviews and reads that more people noticed something good or bad or had a good or bad experience.
Anyway, I certainly agree with you on the issue of lack of different backgrounds and too many close ups.
Great review!
|
03-09-12 04:27am
|
Reply
94
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
It sure is ;)
And thank you for the nice comment and trust!
|
03-09-12 04:21am
|
Comment
95
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
03-09-12 04:19am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
96
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm a lover of HD.
Could you specify what formats and dimensions they are using?
For example, 720 is HD as well and that just wouldn't cut it for me.
Call me spoiled ;)
|
03-06-12 06:41am
|
Reply
97
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Thank you for the thumbs up! Really appreciate it :)
If I did a very subjective score, I would have given it a lower score as well.
But I gave it a score that reflects the appeal to the people that are into this kind of thing.
|
03-05-12 04:01pm
|
Comment
98
|
Brooke Marks
(0)
|
|
03-05-12 03:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
99
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Did a review on the site. Just so you know :)
|
03-04-12 10:56am
|
Review
100
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
03-04-12 10:54am (Update History)
Reason: Added pro: frame rates, specified as well.
|
| Pros: |
* Slightly better than average looking girls (matter of taste)
* Higher than usual frame rates, this results in smoother and sometimes more lively videos
* Really adds to the WTF in the WTF network
* Rather easy navigation. On the verge of being too simplistic
* Good rating and commenting system
* Plenty of information given with every video
* MANY different formats and frame rates to choose from
* Mobile phones and tablets are supported with their own files. |
| Cons: |
* Most of the info given with every video is only on the page of the video itself.
* Not many people rate the videos
* might be too strange for most as it's an, let's say, acquired taste.
* Galleries are not really interesting but are downloadable in ZIP files.
* Could use some diversity, even though it's quite strange the novelty wears off quite fast.
* Doesn't add much to the network if you're really not into this sort of thing.
* Not much content yet. 21 videos at time of writing this review. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is something different. I will try to be as objective and normal about it as possible though it's quite a task...
All right. So, this website is about cute girls (mostly eastern European) having sex with a guy in a panda-suit. I'm not sure if it's supposed to seem like the panda is a stuffed animal or an actual panda but does that really matter? No.
It's still strange. Unless of course, you are into "furries".
So, the scenes don't differ that much from each other, which is a shame because the novelty wears off quite fast because of this and thus doesn't really add much to the already existing WTF network.
However, the website is solid and easy to navigate. Something even a bit simplistic.
18 Screenshots per page to click on. Each one will take you to the designated download page for that specific video.
This is where it becomes interesting. The download options seem infinite as you may choose not only between different formats but also between different frame rates.
These are the options:
Windows 7:
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
576p
432p
Win XP / Vista:
576p
MacOS (same for AppleTV):
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
432p
320p
iPad / iPad 2 (same for iPhone4):
720p 25fps
432p
320p
iPhone3 / iPod:
320p
Android:
720p 25fps
432p
320p
Though, these are just suggestions. As you can probably imagine you can play the different formats on different platforms. But they are good suggestions.
The galleries, which are offered with each video, are not really worth mentioning. Which is the only thing worth mentioning.
Downloads are fast and managers are allowed. The average speed I got was about 7 Megabytes per second.
Also, the videos are DRM-free. So that's always a big plus.
The comments and ratings have a solid system as well, though like with most websites, is often overlooked and not used. This is really up to the users but the they could create a little more incentive to get people to start rating and commenting more. You just have to go by the screenshots and descriptions now.
A fun and more recurring thing you see is the tagging system. They add tags to the description of the video so you can click on that tag, like Big Boobs, and are shown more videos with this tag. It's an easy way of navigating through many videos.
All in all the website is a solid one which offers something strange to the already existing WTF network. The WTF network can finally (sort of)
live up to it's name.
Would I recommend getting a subscription with the network over this website? No. But if there are other websites within the network that caught your eye, it's fun to try it out. |
|
03-04-12 10:53am
Replies (4)
|
