| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for writing the review, skippy, very helpful. By a coincidence I fell onto hegre while searching for a particular model I "discovered" on MetArt. Hegre has a huge number of galleries for her and I'm curious how his vision differs from the MetArt photographer. Your review was extremely encouraging.
|
12-12-17 05:14pm
|
Reply
52
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
Currently, the website shows the price as $14.95, recurring.
|
02-02-13 12:07pm
|
Reply
53
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Really, the computer is not the problem, nor is my Internet connection. Like I said, no problem with other websites. I did send a report to the Support team but haven't gotten a response. I'll give it another day or two before I start complaining and cancel. Before that happens, there is one video I'm willing to wait 25 minutes for: Jia Lissa fucking a man!
|
04-26-20 09:21am
|
Comment
54
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
|
04-23-20 11:48am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
55
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I took them up on an email offer to join at $15/month and have been considering making the effort to write a review. They currently have 135 videos and 149 image sets. The photos are pretty lame but the videos are another thing. "Real orgasms"? Yeah, well, as real as they get in porn. Scenes are 11-12 minutes with a fair amount of teasing/stripping. Don't look for screaming and thrashing about; the masturbation is genteel and fairly quiet with few props that I've seen. Video quality is exceptional and the women mostly stunning. I got my money's worth in two videos of Mila Azul.
|
12-09-16 12:20pm
|
Reply
56
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I log in to MetArt every day and have for years. I'm probably the person you refer to who was interested in the orientation of photos (landscape v portrait) because I'm primarily interested in photos for wallpaper slideshows. MetArt is rich in landscape photos, although a few photographers only shoot that for crotch shots or boob photos that chop off the model's head.
Crotch shots have become far more common than they once were on the site and some photographers include far too many for my taste. Spread butts and emphasize on the anus have also become prevalent for some photographers, which plays very well for a few of the more ardent regular commenters. I personally enjoy more whole-body, or medium close-ups.
I simply ignore the monthly masturbation video. Initially I found it annoying but as long as they don't try to substitute it for one of the four daily sets, I'm fine working around it.
|
02-19-19 03:44pm
|
Reply
57
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Good idea and d'oh to me for not thinking of that solution. I'll let you all know what I think.
|
06-09-16 12:23pm
|
Reply
58
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
As a subscriber to MetArt, I've received an email offer to join MetArt X for $14.99, which seems like a more reasonable price indeed. I would include a link here but I cannot see how to get to this page directly without having received the email.
I was hoping to see some feedback from people who had actually joined the site. The "tour" claims daily updates but some of "this week's videos" are dated in July and the same is true for photo galleries. There is no indication of the ratio of galleries to videos that I can see.
|
06-09-16 11:29am
|
Reply
59
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
This is a most excellent and helpful review. I was a huge Met-Art fan back in the day but it looks like I stopped in late 2010. Over time I've gotten more and more into video, mostly hardcore, but I miss those gorgeous women and have given serious thought to resubscribing. Your review pushes me closer and closer to doing that. Thanks.
And the discount doesn't hurt.
|
11-08-15 01:07pm
|
Reply
60
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
That makes a lot of sense, and it's a shame. It would explain why the home page hasn't been updated for a year.
|
10-01-22 12:11pm
|
Reply
61
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I think the real question is why are you a Newbie when you have written a few thousand reviews? I get the distinct impression this website is on autopilot.
|
09-27-22 02:00pm
|
Review
62
|
MPL Studios
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly professional glamour photography with extremely attractive and experienced models. Settings are designed to highlight the model and are generally beautiful. There don't seem to be any tacky motel rooms, for example.
Models are almost exclusively Russian and Ukrainian and typically slender and very fit. Bodies are apparently all natural and accessories very minimal.
Some of the models have more than 100 galleries/films. Updates occur every two days. Galleries tend to be 60-100+ images. Recent galleries are available as zips in 4000px, 2000px and 1200px. Much older galleries are largely available in 2000x and 1200px. There are currently about 400,000 images.
Videos are available up to 1920 x 1080. Videos are sorted as Explicit, Lifestyle and Sensual. There are currently about 800 videos. |
| Cons: |
MPLStudios is more likely than most sites to offer familiar models under unfamiliar names. If you're a collector, this requires some research. For example, Monika Dee is a familiar and welcome MetArt model and is known as Kaitlin at MPLStudios.
Zipped galleries are named with 8 digits. No photographer, no title. On the website the galleries include that information but it does not transfer to files.
There are no customer comments. IMO, this is a mixed bag. The comments can be helpful at times but they can also encourage bickering and/or snotty comments about pubic hair.
Biographical information is minimal. Almost nonexistent, in fact, other than debut age, nationality, and breast size.
Models are almost exclusively slender white girls. That happens to be my type, so not always a con. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a great fan of glam erotica and for many years my loyalty has been to one website & family of websites. However, over the last few years that source has lost its, er, glamour for me. A few of the photographers with long histories have apparently quit trying. It's not unusual for one of them to take a beautiful woman (and they are, for the most part, beautiful) out to a rocky ledge or a lilac farm and put her through the same series of gymnastics over and over, without venturing into new territory. There are some long-standing photographers who take their art seriously, and these are most likely to get hammered in comments especially if they're not explicit enough. My personal taste is for natural-looking positions, so feet behind the ears so we can see her anus has limited appeal especially when it's repetitive.
That particular website has at least four updates every single day, which means they need a lot of material and the glory days of a boundless supply of models seems to be gone. A lot of the models are simply decent-looking women willing to take their clothes off for the camera. It feels like the webmaster is throwing images against the wall to see what sticks. Photographers often rely on quantity over quality and I frankly tire of shabby motel rooms.
True debut models at MPLStudios are rare these days and most have a solid track record with lots of experience either here or at other glamour sites. They are, virtually without exception, drop-dead gorgeous and the settings, whether indoors or out are likewise. MPLStudios takes models to glamorous locations, singly or in groups and spends time with them in those locations.
Rather than a lot of different (or indifferent) models, the website focuses on a smaller cast. Which means, for instance, that I recently sorted through more than 4,000 images of Lana Lane to select material for my personal screen savers. This was not a painful process.
Once upon a time, Digital Desire exhibited this level of professionalism and had seemingly cornered the market on knock-down, drag-out beauties. That was due to the experience, professionalism and reputation of J. Stephen Hicks. After his untimely death in 2013 all that was lost. MPLStudios feels to me like it's filling that gap.
Webmaster is very responsive. |
|
09-05-22 01:53pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
63
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Speaking only for me, I think it would be great if you added new sets of the best models on a regular basis. Perhaps if you tied the new sets to votes from the members, they'd be more inclined to choose favorites. And maybe some of the girls would be encouraged to continue modeling if they got work more frequently. ??
Frankly, I was amazed that you were able to find as many models as you have, at the rate you post them. I think most sites would have gone back and added sets to popular girls, often by shooting more material and stashing it for months, or by having the photographer (or a different photographer) bring the girl back for a new session.
Good work overall, definitely.
|
04-25-12 08:18am
|
Reply
64
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Narrowed the list down to:
Annik
Adrianne Black
Alanova
Brie Turner
Chloe
Keithy
Lesperonsa
Nicol
Nicole Rider
Samantha Bentley
Tiffany Fox
Tiffany Haze
Withney
|
04-23-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
65
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Oooh, that's homework! I'll put together a list.
|
04-23-12 06:41am
|
Comment
66
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
|
04-22-12 12:16pm
Replies (8)
|
Comment
67
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
|
04-25-15 11:20am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
68
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
|
12-23-12 12:40pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
69
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
01-16-13 02:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
70
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Excellent and thorough review. I'll go back and revisit the site. When it first appeared I wasn't getting much out of it but it sounds more promising now.
|
01-20-16 02:24pm
|
Reply
71
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
Rather than take the one day trial, I signed up as a member via Best Porn's discounted price and I'm enjoying the site a lot. There are a number of familiar faces (and bodies) along with many that are new to me. Unfortunately, many of those new faces are only shown as photosets, with no videos. The photosets themselves look like standard MetArt sets but with lots of touching and lots of genital closeups -- to my taste way too much of those.
Case in point is Mia Sollis, who is a truly gorgeous redhead and represented by nothing but photos. How much more erotic would a video of her touching herself intimately be? Sigh. Maybe someday.
My only technical issue with the site is that webpages take forever to open. Downloads are quick, but getting to the download page is painful.
|
02-27-14 08:54am
|
Reply
72
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Reply
I hadn't even heard of this site, but after reading your lengthy comments on Joy Mii and subsequent recommendation of SexArt I've spent time checking it out. I, too, have reached saturation point with anal and dp and the rest of fairly brutal hardcore porn. I do find lovely models but they're almost entirely turned over to anal assaults and trying to find scenes without it is nearly impossible. Comments scream about a lack of anal scenes even at a place like Video Box where there is virtually complete coverage. And, of course, the quality of camerawork, direction, design etc is terrible. I'm culling a high percentage of what I've downloaded over the years realizing that most of it I never watch. I'm giving it a try because it looks wonderful - of course I thought that about X-Art, Joy Mii and Babes at one time or the other, so fingers crossed. Thanks.
|
02-16-14 10:37am
|
Comment
73
|
Sis Loves Me
(0)
|
|
06-15-19 01:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
74
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I'm very interested in the models on this site but doing a preview I've come up with a question: Does Skokoff ever take photos in landscape format. Everything I've seen is portrait but that might be a result of the previewing software.
|
07-10-21 05:08pm
|
Reply
75
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Over the years I've gotten a lot of videos from this network but once they introduced VR the trend I noticed was that all of the really attractive models were exclusively (or nearly so) in VR--and I like regular porn, thank you. I can't get past that. It's not that the network is expensive but if I keep seeing all the hotties as essentially unavailable, I'm not interested in joining again.
|
03-22-20 10:36am
|
