| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
roamer13's Review
I've been meaning to post my own review, but have been too lazy. Sticking around for two months was definitely worth it; the access that followed was almost overwhelming. I love the site with its abundance of gorgeous young women (almost all European, slender, relatively small boobs)--might have stuck around just for all the Angelica videos (and Michelle aka Red Fox). My cup runneth over.
My only complaints with the site have to do with lousy navigation. Just getting through to the updates can be tricky, but the worst is while browsing through a model's page. Once you've moved to the next page, clicking on a video page means that going back to the model page you always end up on page 1. (That's garbled, I know, but it's hard to explain.)
If you're into peeing videos you're in luck. Never seen so many although I don't really get the appeal.
|
09-24-14 03:48pm
|
Reply
102
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
You saved me the trouble of writing a review! I've got the same reaction across the board -- navigation issues like you describe, plus using a back button from a model's page 2 set always returns to page 1.
Yes, there are oodles of gorgeous sexy women and typically superb video, perfectly lit with high resolution. And a bare minimum of super close ups. No more loving shots of ballsacks or cervixes. The videos actually use multiple angles (and cameras?)
I don't know why they separate WowGirls and WowPorn, but it means having to check both model lists for a particular girl. Mildly irritating.
|
06-12-14 02:05pm
|
Reply
103
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I rejoined Wow Girls/Porn a month or so back when they dropped the overcharge for downloads. It used to be my favorite network for a long time. When I joined this time, I only had access to two sites, although it's impossible to tell much of the time which is which or whether there is any real difference between them.
After reading your review, I took a look and discovered that, without notice, they had bumped me to Diamond and I had access to All Fine Girls. Which meant there was a lot of new (to me) content and finding it without confusing it with Girls/Porn is very easy. What does surprise me is that there are a lot of girls who are exclusive to All Fine Girls, with no overlap with the other two sites.
As to the quality of the models, I should note that a number of them will be familiar to fans of the Met Art sites, although you may not have previously seen them with a semen mustache.
|
11-24-18 04:16pm
|
Reply
104
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
I don't understand your use of the word "amateur". All these models, men and women, pose and have sex in exchange for money. That's pretty much the definition of "professional."
|
05-02-20 02:30pm
|
Reply
105
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.
The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.
|
03-14-14 09:33am
|
Reply
106
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
brig's Reply
I try never to speak for others, and I know that a lot of your customers and others want different content than I do. I like g/g scenes, solos and b/g scenes that finish without money shots--which I believe to be left over from the days when there seemed to be a need to prove that, yes, he really did screw her and he really did come. Why else would he pull out of a perfectly nice orifice and why oh why would he jack himself off (sometimes for far too many minutes)?
To my taste, the guys are just in the way, especially the guys with the freakishly large johnsons. If I really wanted to look at giant schlongs I'd be cruising through the gay pornsites.
I did appreciate a slight uptick in the number of better-endowed models--if only for the sake of variety. Your taste in models remains impeccable.
|
11-26-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
107
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thanks for the pointer on Joymii. I will definitely check it out.
|
11-25-12 08:43am
|
Comment
108
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 01:03pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
109
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I let my subscription to X-Art lapse in the Spring and I'm eager to re-up. The women are beautiful and very much to my taste, and the men don't look like escaped convicts. There is indeed definite rapport between (or among) the women and men (or women and women) that is very different from what is featured on most hardcore sites. No gagging or spitting, no choking or ATM; maybe it's vanilla for some but for me it's very erotic.
The comments at X-Art often put me off because people would complaining about the very nature of the material and demanding videos that were much more hardcore. There are a million websites that carry just that kind of material, and the complainers are certainly free to move on.
|
08-08-12 06:03pm
|
|
