| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hi e4me,
Thanks for the response. Much to my surprise I haven't joined yet, but probably will despite reservations. I don't mind the tease stuff at all. In fact, it was an interview with her recently, where she said she would never do hardcore, which caused me to become even more interested in her site. I was under the assumption that she had moved on to become a full-fledged porn-star, I guess because of that Aria Pornstar person or whatever. Aria strikes me as being highly intelligent and has a great deal of respect for herself. That's all a major plus for me, and I don't say it because it's politically correct. That amazing body of hers has all the more value - in the usual way as well as in the respect that it is in some sense a commodity, which she knows - by virtue of the fact that she herself places a higher value on it than certain others in the "skin-trade".
Sorry for the babble, and congrats on edging out Snowdude for the top spot. How are you enjoying your special parking spot and your key to the executive washroom?
;) WWW
|
02-15-08 04:12pm
|
Reply
227
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I REALLY want to join this site, since Aria is as close to perfect for me as anyone else I can think of off-hand (except Salma Hayek, but she doesn't pose naked, alas...), but I'm afraid I'll regret it. I can't see taking the trouble with small pics anymore. What size are we talking about here? Also, I read a recent interview where she says she works harder on her site than on anything else, so I hope she's upped the quality on her vids since BP's site facts' last revision. 500-600k is pretty shabby.
But I know myself too well and I'll plonk down the cabbage on Aria before I get an answer to this. When I get rich and famous I'm gonna marry Aria and make Salma jealous.
|
02-14-08 08:31pm
|
Reply
228
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler,
Thanks for the reply. When we do a review we sort of harp on the negatives, that's part and parcel of the whole thing; but when all is said and done, if the people behind this site were to take all the material they have and present it in a more accessible fashion, say, the way ATK does, then they would have one of the best sites going. Higher-res pics would be a good move - a necessary move now that it's 08, in my opinion - as would a slight drop in price, though that might be a problem only for those of us in the states.
To be truthful, I prefer the European approach to presenting beautiful young women, and the hardcore material, vid-wise I mean, comes across as being far less mysogynistic, and just less sleezy in general, compared to American porn. If Club Seventeen could manage to offer at least some of their DVDs in full, via download, now that would easily justify the 46 US dollars.
|
02-08-08 08:35pm
|
Review
229
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Tons of content.
- Very cute models.
- Stays within the teeny niche.
- *Some* of the video content is top notch.
- Newer pics are decent at 800x1200, and there are quite a few, to say the least. |
| Cons: |
- What the hell does Seventeen mean?
- Way ! too expensive for us yanks. 40+ buckaroos.
- Choices are great, but this site overwhelms you with choices, causing navigational havoc. See BL.
- Pic size could (should) go up a notch. Older pics are just too small for the jaded collector of 2008.
- No zips
- "High" quality option for vid downloads not so high, at least for the vids I checked. In fact, at 604 kbps, it looks dismal at full screen.
- Pages take too long to load because of all the fancy but useless pic-frame borders and variously-colored backgrounds. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was turned down at first by this site but they took me on my second try. So here goes:
I'm disappointed. Main problem: the site needs Organization. Categories are a good thing, but this place is category mayhem. There are 35+ picture-gallery categories, and a few of these are split into "gallery" and "archive". Some categories have separate numbered archives. In the vid section (which is called Seventeen Cinema [I think] and requires another log-in) there are 42 categories, or "labels". The vids are taken from full-length DVDs which you can order and are not entities unto themselves. Most vids offer high and low downloads. Some offer "full", which means highest quality: 2100 kbps, 720X540. These vids look great.
For pic collectors like Willy, who has short term memory loss in spades, all these categories are too much: blondes, brunettes, redheads, wet teens, shaved teens, kinky teens, schoolgirls, highschool girls, dirty teens, anal teens, left-handed teens, vertically-challenged teens, teens who read Proust.... you get the idea. There are some great sets and tons of cute models, but while I'm browsing and clicking I keep wondering what I might be missing someplace else. There is a model directory, but each name I clicked on merely took me to a set of four or five pics: not thumbs leading to sets or vids, just pictures! What's the point of a directory if it doesn't direct you to the model's content?
I'm running low on characters. BL: save your dough, yanks. |
|
02-07-08 11:29pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
230
|
Best Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Comment
I agree with your sentiments in regard to cumshots. I had a membership to a famous facials site a while back and was thoroughly bored as well as somewhat disgusted by the content. Judging by what I saw, these guys could barely get it up and almost always finished by hand (sometimes for an absurdly long time) and all they could manage was a pathetic dribble which they smeared on the girl's face. What a complete waste of time. They don't call cumshots "money-shots" for nothing. I think these guys do this stuff too often and the whole act is becoming meaningless to them.
I think there's something deeply rooted in the male libido which makes it exciting to us for the female to witness ejaculation. Something primordial, as if it's a kind of visual proof that we are viable males who can procreate. Thus, the more powerful the ejaculation, the more impressed the female will be. Not that it really does impress her, but I think it goes something like that on at least a subconscious level for males. Hence the popularity of the money-shot in adult film and video, and all the more reason to be irritated by male performers who have to jerk-off for ten minutes before finishing, and then produce nothing but a weak dribble.
You must have seen Peter North's "work". There are not too many people like him, however. In fact, I think he might be one of a kind. Lucky bastard.
|
01-25-08 06:46pm
|
Reply
231
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I despise music in adult video. In fact, I want it so quiet I can hear the girl's bones crack when she kneels down.
|
01-25-08 12:16am
|
Comment
232
|
Monster Pimps
(0)
|
|
01-24-08 09:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
233
|
Monster Pimps
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots and lots of material, both pics and vids.
- Zip-files for a large portion of newer sets (this must be new seeing as exotics4me said there were no zips in his review).
- Wide range of very attractive models, including some well-knowns.
- Video quality is excellent in the primary video sites (Panty-Jobs, Lipstick BJ, and Exploited Secretaries). |
| Cons: |
- Terrible name for this network, and doesn't jibe with the largely softcore content. Monster Pimps sounds like something a rip-off site would call itself.
- Pics could be larger, and there are a fair portion of really small pics (400x600). But this is an old site so this is to be expected.
- Site is loaded with video-feed junk (which they do not need) and advertisements.
- Navigation is workable but you can miss a lot of stuff (mostly pic sets) if you don't poke around a bit. This network has three times the material I originally thought it did in my first few days. |
| Bottom Line: |
Quite frankly, this site contains some of the best softcore picture sets in the cheerleader/panty niche that I've encountered. Lamentably, the pics are smallish to very small. The big ones are 684x1024, but many are as small as 400x600. The models are cute to drop-dead gorgeous, and the sets are not toy-obssessed. Whoever is behind the site knows what panty-afficianados want to see.
As exotics4me says, the Panty-job videos are interesting and definitely not something you see everywhere else. My only issue with these vids concerns one of the male performers, who often can't even get it up and who produces some truly pitiful money-shots. Come on, if you're gonna make a girl work that hard for fifteen to twenty minutes, these sessions should end with a bang, not a whimper (to steal a line from the poet, T.S. Eliot).
If the pics were larger I would consider this network to be in the top five percentile for the softcore/cheerleader/panty niche. It's definitely NOT for the hardcore fan or the toy-fanatic. If it were up to me, I would convert this network into one big site and implement a good search function so one can easily locate all the material for each particular model, and I'd put the dinky pics in a separate archive. |
|
01-24-08 01:54am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
234
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Hi apoctom,
Bear in mind that one PU reviewer recently mentioned that the trial at Eighteen18 is now very limited: no vids and only five pics per set. Eighteen18 is part of the Score group, so who knows, perhaps this new limited trial access is all across the board. I say new because I had trials at both Eighteen18 and Scoreland which granted virtually full-access. In fact, there were no limitations at all at Eighteen18 when I went for the trial there. At Scoreland, the trial was limited only that some of the magazine archives allowed you to download the first page of pics only. As far as I could tell, you had access to all the main Scoreland pics and videos.
|
01-24-08 01:03am
|
Reply
235
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
nomad's Comment
Hi nomad,
This must be something new. I had a trial here not more than three months ago and pretty much everything was available. I had the trial at Scoreland only about a week or so ago, and it's the same outfit that does 18Eighteen. The trial there was only limited in that some of the magazine archives only let you get the first page of pics.
It is definitely a raw deal to take five bucks for five pics per set and no vid access. In fact, that's no trial as far as I'm concerned, it's bullshit. Teen Dreams and other sites give you practically the same thing on the guest tour, as you say.
Sorry for that, and it's good that you're giving a heads-up for everyone else. If this is the real-deal here and not just something gone awry, I'll have to edit my review of this site accordingly.
WWW
|
01-14-08 09:23pm
|
Comment
236
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
|
01-13-08 10:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
237
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the reply, but I think maybe my review is giving the wrong impression.
While the site is no doubt softcore, it's most definitely not non-nude. There is plenty of nudity; in fact, there's even a section for nude galleries and videos, though that isn't the only place nudity happens. The action between the girls is often very erotic and it seems very genuine most of the time.
About the DRM protected vids: I believe there is only one small section containing these. I would estimate at least 85-90 percent of the video here is not DRM protected. I do agree with you, though, and I avoid DRM sites as well.
|
01-07-08 09:03pm
|
Review
238
|
TNV Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- True to the niche
- Very pretty girls.
- Lots of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, and quality seems to be improving steadily.
- These girls seem to really love smooching with one another. Can't blame them for that now can we? |
| Cons: |
- Too much outdoors material. Kinis are for sunning and swimming, panties are for indoors. Or maybe I'm just crazy?
- Too many tats. Tattoos are nasty, dang it.
- Pic quality needs to be taken up a notch or two.
- *Some* of the best quality vids are DRM protected. |
| Bottom Line: |
TNV rates a higher score than its sister site, Virginal Visions, because there is so much more material here and because the vids are more varied and of higher quality, generally speaking. I think the pics are better (content-wise) at VV, but that's because I'm an old schooler when it comes to ladies' skivvies.
I ended up keeping almost 6 gigs of video and 261 zipped pic sets. The pic sets are numbered up into the 800's, so I obviously didn't get anywhere near all of them. Newer vids come in at 1000 to 1600kbps, 640x480, and run from 15 to 20 mins, and you can usually get them in one file. I don't know if 20 minutes is the 'whole' video in any particular case, but these files are big enough. Most of the pics are small, but the bigger ones are 1024x768. Despite their size they are very nice, for the most part.
I don't care for the fainting vids. There's something creepy about a guy feeling up a girl while she's out cold. I know it's fantasy, but it still bothers me.
The site is very softcore and heavy on soft-lesbianism, and only recommended to those who appreciate pretty girls getting it on in their underwear.
One more note: when I joined the site it was having technical problems: pics not opening, links not working, etc. I emailed the webmaster and by the next day everything was fixed. There was even a message posted at the site about maintenance problems which were being attended to. Good work, and good customer service. Few points extra for that. |
|
01-06-08 09:11pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
239
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
|
01-06-08 08:03pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
240
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I hope the admins are taking note of this. See, we DO need a forum!
"You are what you is
You is what you am
You aint what you're not
A cow don't make ham"
The above is from memory, so it might not be exactly right.
|
01-06-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
241
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I had to laugh at this, jd. It's 2008 now, and some of these sites will just have to come clean about how old their models are. At some major sites you can see models' ages at anywhere between 19 and 23 who've had pics all over the net since the late nineties.
Tawny Stone should be in the World Record's book for staying 18 longer than any other human in history. A biological miracle!
|
01-06-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
242
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Zappa was amazing, though his symphonic stuff was way over my head. His kids are pretty talented as well. Dweezil and Ahmet (sp?) have a great band. Can't remember the name at the moment, but I saw some good vids on YouTube. "My Meat Mailbox" is a great song.
|
01-05-08 09:58pm
|
Reply
243
|
Pretty Lil Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Comment
Thanks for the warning, King.
|
01-05-08 09:49pm
|
Reply
244
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
True, what you said. But believe it or not, it's mostly the older sets that I found more to my liking. Tons of pics from Markham's site were all over newsgroups back in the day (I don't know if they originated at Markham's or not), so maybe it's some kind of misty nostalgic thing I'm responding to.
|
01-03-08 08:27pm
|
Reply
245
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Drooler. I suppose I should be happy that I've saved 46 USD. It's just that I've been tempted by this site for so long I finally figured I'd give it a whirl.
|
01-03-08 08:18pm
|
Comment
246
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
|
01-02-08 09:45pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
247
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler,
It's actually nice to know there's someone besides me who's a bit tired of the toy thing.
My trial at Markham is up and I must say that 3 bucks for 3 days is a steal here, regardless of the toy-obssession. I was able to exploit the search function and find many sets which were right up my alley. To be honest, I think the only real downside to the site is its over-emphasis on toys. I may go for a full month at some point, but not soon.
|
01-02-08 07:34pm
|
Comment
248
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
|
12-30-07 02:47pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
249
|
College Uniform
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Stays unswervingly true to the uniform niche
- Beautiful models who know how to pose
- Jana Mrazkova! Yum.
- Hi quality pics, and lots of them. 38 gallery pages plus 7 bonus pages. Pics average 1000x1500 and they weigh in at nearly one meg each.
- Zip files for pics: a must for this type of site
- frequent updates
- Member forum and responsive webmaster
- Classy site in every sense
- Inexpensive trial gives you plenty of time to peruse the content |
| Cons: |
- Vid section is still small and quality is not on par with pics: avg 770-880 kbps, 640x480
- Navigation issues: Top navigation bar not showing up most of the time for me. You will need your back button if you have the same problem
- Quite a few links not working, but webmaster will fix if notified |
| Bottom Line: |
The strength of this site lies in the photo sections, and, as with LVpanty, the only reason I didn't rate it a 90 or higher is because the video section is not on par with the quality of the pics.
A too-brief pass through the material at this site can give you the wrong impression right from the start, as it did for me. A lot of the time the picture sets are broken up into separate galleries, with fully-clothed or mostly-clothed galleries coming first and the stripping content coming afterwards. There is plenty of skin here, though the only nudity is bare breasts. The undies are sublime. Upskirts and downblouse pics abound, and this site would be nirvana to a leg-man.
Subtlety is the key word here. It's decidedly on the soft end of softcore, and it's certainly not porn, at least not by my definition; but while the photos don't necessarily excite me they still manage to impress the hell out of me, and I'm not terribly interested in uniforms.
I posted a message about a misdirecting gallery-link in the forum at College Uniform and there was a response within two hours, as well as a fix. And this was on Christmas morning, no less.
I would highly recommend this site to people who are very interested in the niche, or just people who appreciate excellent photography and beautiful women. Those looking for anything beyond what the site promises will most likely be disappointed. |
|
12-26-07 10:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
250
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
I agree with your two main points.
Japanese women, AV models in particular, are simply some of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. I also don't care for what you describe as the "truly submissive" style in Japanese hardcore. I haven't seen that much of it, but I've surfed Japanese TGPs and have seen so many vidcaps from videos where it looks like the girl is being molested, often by serveral guys, poked and prodded and groped and treated like a lab rat. The girls don't seem to be enjoying themselves. I could never get off watching stuff like that. Of course it's not just the Japanese. Max(nolink) Hardcore is a sick fuck if I ever saw one.
On the other hand the Japanese do some stuff better than anyone. Their softcore/panty/teaser photography is amazing. One of the things I like hardcore-wise (and I don't like much hardcore) is the reverse gang-bang: one lucky dope and several women. The Japanese go all-out with that. I saw a few vids featuring one guy with more than ten women. Not one at a time: they all hover over him like happy vultures and laugh as they administer their playful "torture". And I imagine they PAY the guy for it.
I need a new line of work.
|
12-24-07 10:00pm
|
|
