| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks. I'll have a look.
|
12-20-07 02:32am
|
Comment
252
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
|
12-19-07 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
253
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content
- Some excellent video content
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024
- good bonus site on offer
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site. |
| Cons: |
- Non-exclusive material
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions.
Cute Panty Girls is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better.
Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports.
Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.
Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics. |
|
12-19-07 06:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
254
|
Little Lupe
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lupe is gorgeous
- Lots of content
- Large, good-quality pictures
- Decent quality videos
- Hardcore and softcore content |
| Cons: |
- Highly visible and intrusive watermark in pics
- pic sets are repetitive and predictable |
| Bottom Line: |
This is easily the best from the teenrevenue group of sites. Pics are plentiful and range from vid-caps to 1800x1200. Lupe looks great from any angle, and is about as modest as Bill Gates is poor.
Vids look good and range from teaser stuff to hardcore. Good quality offered though not top end: 640x480, 1100 kbps. There are app. 65 vids. Features some of the best girls-kissing suff I've ever seen (though there is not too much of it), as well as masturbation, BJ, and boy-girl.
One gripe about vids: why must Lupe stare into the camera while she's going at it? I've seen this a lot and I don' get it. It's as if to say, "See, look, I really am a horny little sexpot. See? Look what I can do..."
Lupe looks young but in my opinion it's not a problem. Look at some of the other girls in this network: they have them playing kid's games, even coloring in a coloring book for goodness' sake, in addition to all the other teeny-trappings. Lupe looks young but acts her age, in a manner of speaking, and I never felt creepy watching her stuff.
About the males in these clips, which the other reviewers mentioned: One of the things I hate about modern porn is that the guys look like street thugs and seem to hate women. In the clips I saw the guys looked pretty passive compared to some of the net-garbage I've seen. I only viewed about one third of the clips, however, so it could be the other reviewers are right. They are extremely well-endowed. That's certainly true. |
|
12-19-07 05:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
255
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Vids first, since that is most people's main interest:
I've only been a member for two days, but so far I've downloaded about a dozen or so vids. Two are long, good-quality (640x480,2000 kbps) handjob scenes where the only panty content is about thirty seconds in the beginning. Both clips are over eleven minutes long; two of the vids are lower quality (320x240,705 kbps) masturbation clips where the panties stay on, both about ten minutes long; then there's a very good quality (768x576, 2009 kbps) masturbation vid with toy which runs three minutes; there are also a few mild spanking vids here of fairly low to middling quality. There's a couple teaser vids and a stripping/interview vid. This is definitely a softcore site and NOT a non-nude site. It seems to me that it's a grab-bag of various types of content with panties figuring somewhere in the mix. Some of the material looks familiar, like the handjob vids, but I can't place them. There are lots of vids here and by the looks of the thumb-links there is more than likely more masturbation. As for the pics, same thing: a lot of the sets are similar to the ATK/Teen-Flood type of softcore: full nudity, occasional masturbation/toy stuff. The material is not exclusive, as I am sure I've seen quite a few sets at other sites. Again, the quality is hit and miss. Most of it is negligible.
|
12-13-07 12:34am
|
Comment
256
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 11:23pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
257
|
Voyeur 4 You
(0)
|
|
12-06-07 08:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
258
|
Smother.de
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
259
|
Little April
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- April is very cute and is nice to look at in every way.
- Pic quality is decent: 803 by 1200
- "teeny" niche held to faithfully. |
| Cons: |
- The site is dead, and has been for a while.
- Only 40 pic sets, avg 36 pics
- 50 or so vid episodes broken into sections, some as short as one minute. Quality is fair to lousy and does no justice to this girl.
- Masturbation scenes are as uninspired as they are uninspiring, for those of you who might be into that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wanted to see what these teen-revenue sites were all about since I've been seeing these girls on TGPs for years. Hopefully I will do a review of each of them.
There is no point at all in joining April's site by itself, since if you like her you've probably collected most of the pics already. The vids will be of interest only to those who have an inordinate crush on April.
Impressions: April comes across as an innocent, decidedly non-trashy young lady who most likely did this to earn some money - which evidently she did and is still doing - and then moved on. She seemed semi-sleezy to me from the TGP pics only because I expected there to be harder content on her site which the free pics were only a teasing sample of (hey, if you can't end a sentence with a preposition on a porn-review site, where can you?).
Conclusions: As cute as she is, her pics have been floating around for so long, and the site has been inactive for so long, it seems a bit dishonest to sell it as a stand-alone site worth dropping twenty dollars on, which they are still doing despite the fact that her site is included in the teenrevenue network, which is all of ten bucks more.
The extras at April's site are negligible: Teenagepink, PrivateL TV, and Panties Down are little more than small archives of old and oft-circulated pics which have a mildewy smell about them, although there are a few gems among the rubble. |
|
11-19-07 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
260
|
Dirty Lilly
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lilly!
- Zips for pic sets (one file, not per-page)
- Single-file video downloads, HQ offered (943kbps), options for Flash, WMV hq/lq.
- Plenty of hardcore: should be plus for hc fans
- Good amount of content for the price, and good quality
- Lilly has a great sense of humor |
| Cons: |
- Diary section updated recently, but it seems comments are removed, since there are no comments for any of the entries save one: "hot body! i want it!" My kind regards were deleted (sniff...sniff...Lilly hurt Willy...)
- no email address in sight
- I'm pretty sure the vid and pic sections haven't been updated since I joined a few weeks ago |
| Bottom Line: |
Lilly stands out from the crowd of single-model site personalities because of two things: First, she has a great sense of humor which comes across in her videos as much as it does in her text entries through-out the site (if it's not really Lilly writing that stuff in her sweet, mixed-up English then shame on them and shame on me for being such a dufus). Second, she has a great rapport with the camera and beautiful, expressive eyes which I guarantee will imprint themselves in your memory if you give them the chance. That's quite a compliment when you consider it comes from someone who ganders at inaccessible female eyes an awful lot in his spare time and instantly forgets most of them.
Lilly is not drop-dead gorgeous unless she's in make-up, and she has a problem with her teeth which is the cause of one section of her site called "Donate me retainer". You can donate money to her so that she can get her "teeth-aid" and hence have a prettier smile. Yikes, either this is the tackiest thing ever or her site isn't doing well at all.
Lilly has spectacular breasts as well as captivating eyes and claims they're natural. I see no scars in sight. Vids are shot by her boyfriend and the two make a good team: he's well-endowed and the money shots are good; there's a lot of hardcore: sex, oral, insertions, toys, graphic close-ups, as well as softcore.
My polite comment in her diary got deleted. This seems to be their policy, however. That sucks. Points off for that.
Follow-Up:
The quality is better than 943kbps in a lot of the videos. Some go up to 1500+. |
|
11-06-07 12:46am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
261
|
Freaky Panty
(0)
|
|
11-04-07 01:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
262
|
Asian Panty Peeks
(0)
|
Reply of
APP Webmaster's Reply
APP Webmaster,
Hello, and thanks for your courteous reply. I assume that when people talk about navigation at a website they're talking about going from one page or area to another and back, moving through and consuming the content in an expiditious manner, not simply being able to find the content. Being able to access the content at APP was not the problem. The problem consisted in how the three main pages were oriented. These pages contained thumbnail links listed vertically down the page, and there were no dates or set numbers anywhere, although a few of the links at the top said "new". I found myself scrolling an awful lot to get to the bottom of the two primary pages. As I said in my review, I think these pages are too long. Given the nature of the photo-sets, offering zip-files is an excellent idea, since opening and closing a new window to view each picture in sets where dozens of consecutive thumbs look almost identical is a test for anyone's patience, and I can't imagine what it would be like without a fast connection and a top-end processor. I love Asian models and I love the panty niche, so I found a great deal to enjoy at APP, but my experience would have been much better if there had been some kind of organization and user-friendliness to the site: navigational buttons (back, next, home, what have you), a search option, models' list, numbered sets, categories: browse features of some kind. You have some top-notch material and I guarantee I would join again at some time in the future if there were some changes in that area.
|
10-29-07 11:01pm
|
Review
263
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A lot of content, pics and video-wise
- Sharp, polished pictures, good-sized.
- Vids are above-average quality, new ones are top-notch.
- Navigation is a breeze, except for the tiny type.
- Very classy site.
- Models are good-looking to absolutely stunning.
- Almost fasitious fidelity to the niche. |
| Cons: |
- Need more variety in photo-sets
- Super-sized photos are too few and far between, and you'll have to guess which ones they are.
- Zero nudity. This can be a pro, depending on your frame of mind.
- No model directory, no search functions. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of the classiest tease/lingerie/glamour sites going. "Village Ladies" this IS NOT, as most of the models are stunners. There are a few models here which had me shaking my head and picking my slack-jaw up from the desk.
The pics range from mild teaser shots to the girl spread-eagled with panties on but nonetheless proving without a shadow of a doubt that she's female. Lovers of stockings, panties, high heels, satin and lace, will love it here. Hardcore fans, or people who like to see women degraded, will HATE it.
As far as atmosphere, this is the exact opposite of anything "street" oriented. Getting a teasing glimpse of some of these women is about as much as a guy like me deserves. Open a bottle of Apricot brandy, light up a Dunhill, and enjoy yourself. |
|
09-23-07 09:35pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
264
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.
Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.
There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.
Elvis and me, we'd be mates.
A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.
I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.
Follow-Up:
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material. |
|
09-23-07 09:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Wow, I get 3000 characters for this! Whoo-hoo! I'll try not to use them all up, but I get gabby when it comes to this stuff.
I'm heavily into the non-nude thing, I have to admit, though I've only joined one site - True Tere, hers was non-nude if I remember correctly? - in that niche. I take it lingerie sites are not in the same category? Most of them contain nudity but a few don't.
I checked out the current list here and clicked on a site called NN Latin Teen and what's the first thing I see? Nudity. I guess I just don't understand marketing. If a guy clicks on a site with NN in the title, why show nude pics (albeit small ones) on the welome page? If he wants to see nudity there are thousands of sites he can go to. If he wants non-nude then he wants non-nude. Maybe I don't have the same definition of nudity? To my mind, a naked tush is a nude tush, and hence a pic of a nude tush is not in the non-nude category?
Then again, I was at a site once that features nude and non-nude celebs and the pics were separated into those two categories. To my surprise, bare-butt shots were in the non-nude category. The webmaster told me that law-wise, bare-butts are not considered nudity. Since I like the "A" even more than the "T", naturally it seems crazy to me. But I'm not complaining. I'm just perplexed.
I think if you're gonna call your site non-nude, then let it be non-nude. I never got to see True Tere's naked tush (at least not that I remember...I'm getting older...) and that was part of the deal, part of the fun. That isn't to say I wouldn't look at it if I had the chance. I mean, I like the tease, but I'm not crazy.
Anyway, this is a great addition to PU and I hope to check out some of these NN sites.
p.s: Holy crap, over 1200 characters left....
|
09-21-07 11:38pm
|
Comment
266
|
Sweet N Soft
(0)
|
|
09-13-07 08:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
267
|
Asian Panty Peeks
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good looking models.
- High-quality pics.
- Vids look OK.
- Interesting style, lots of mirrors, costume-play.
- Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is terrible to practically non-existent.
- Use of the term "Lolita" in at least one set title, which I believe is considered unacceptable nowadays and should be.
- Sets are poorly organized and contain tons of the same shots over and over, some turned sideways, some turned upside down, just to beef up the quantity of pics and to tire your patience for no good reason. |
| Bottom Line: |
I need more characters to do justice to how poorly put together this site is. Navigation? What's that? You have what seems to be two main pages with thumbs leading to the galleries. Both pages are over-long. None of the galleries are numbered. There are no model lists or browse features whatsoever. Vids are offered on the right-hand sidebar of one of the main gallery pages.
All pic sets are contained on one page each, with big thumbnails. Some sets have over 200 pics. Every set I looked at so far is made up of a few choice views of the model repeated over and over and over, with tiny variations. These sets could be trimmed by seventy percent and you wouldn't lose anything. They need someone who knows how to coordinate photo sets.
To add to the tedium someone has decided to have each pic open in a new window. Maybe I'm just an idiot but I can't see how to change this. Each pic has to be closed out in order to view another one, unless you want to keep a thousand windows open. To make things even worse, each set is numbered identically: "b_001" to b_ whatever". Always a "b", never a different letter.
This site is way softcore and caters more to the voyeur than the panty/lingerie lover. "Peeks" is what you get most of the time. There is a truckload of tease and very little pay-off, though there are a few sets which contain full nudity. The quality of some of the pics is offset by the sheer tedium caused by this site's lack of organization and concern for the customer.
Follow-Up:
upped the score to 70. |
|
09-05-07 08:09pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
268
|
Sneaky Peeks
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Nifty idea.
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.
- Videos are of good quality.
- Updated regularly. |
| Cons: |
- Small amount of content for the price.
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.
- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.
- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, Panty Maniacs and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential.
The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.
Someone had the "brilliant" idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.
As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.
Some good fun here regardless. |
|
09-01-07 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
269
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I wanted to reply mainly to say I agree about the Latina and Black models being very good. In particular, the Black models. I have only four days left before my current sub runs out and I only just started in the black girls' section. Oh what an idiot I've been!
Some of these women are truly spectacular. I fell in love with a model named Muffin only last night. Be sure to look at Krystal (hope I spelled it right) as well. Aiy aiy aiy, I need a date!
WWW
|
08-27-07 11:56pm
|
Review
270
|
School Girls Asia
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good sized pics
- Good amount of content
- Models are mostly good-looking
- Good adherence to niche |
| Cons: |
- Pics are not hi-res, and the sets are all very similar within their respective categories.
- Site is too plain. One page with all 68 models. Thumbs take you to her pics/vids.
- No updates during my month. None seem to be in the offing either.
- Vids are negligible. I'm not into hardcore, but I doubt those who are will get into these vids very much. Quality is pretty low. |
| Bottom Line: |
I love exotic models, particularly Latinas and Asians, and I've been wanting to see what this company has going for it. "Asia" in the site title could be misleading to some, since most of the models seem to be filipinas. No problem for me, since I like filipinas, but it could be for some.
I get a bit of a bad feeling when I see these sets. Some of these girls are emaciated, for one thing. Rather than feeling desire for them, I want nothing more than to give them a Big Mac. Still others look like they've been put through the ringer: rode hard and put away wet, so to speak.
More often than not, and particularly in the lesbian sets, the models seem like they're merely putting on a show. You'll notice their tongues sticking out in almost every shot, sometimes in contact with nothing - just sticking out, as if men begin to salivate when they see girls with their tongues sticking out. It's cheesy.
This is pure product and little else. Don't get me wrong. There are a lot of very attractive girls here and some good pictures, but when you have pretty girls undressing and a camera nearby almost anyone could produce something useful. The people behind this site need to expand their horizons a bit and be more creative.
I noticed, from various TGPs, that Schoolgirls Asia and LBFM are using some of the same material on both sites. So I certainly won't bother checking out the latter.
Overall, the site is serviceable but only just, and the price is way too high. |
|
08-27-07 11:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
271
|
Wifey's World
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Wifey is beautiful.
- Wifey obviously loves what she does, and does it very well.
- The site has true class in a genre which is usually devoid of it.
- One of the few sites in this genre which recognizes that good sex involves the brain as well as the reproductive organs.
- Good money-shots. No flagging dribblers here. |
| Cons: |
- Only two peformers, and the scenarios are not terribly varied. This opens the way for tedium over the long haul, unfortunately.
- Not much to rave about in regard to the pics section.
- Navigation could be much improved. |
| Bottom Line: |
My profile says I hate most of what is called porn nowadays, and this is true for the most part; but I do like adult video if it is done well.
What caused me to join the Wifey site was recalling a clip I had seen in a Newsgroup a couple years back. Wifey had this intense focus as she did her thing. It was a handjob scene and her eyes were riveted on her "subject" (Mr. Happy). She was not only skilled, but mentally - not just physically - involved in what she was doing.
Whether this intense interest and focus is put-on or not really doesn't matter. Wifey has a good grasp of the male ego and knows exactly what to do, what to say, how to react. With each "money-shot" she seems surprised and impressed, even fascinated. All I can say is, Hubby must be one extremely happy guy.
Despite all this, since there are only two people and since they adhere to a fairly narrow formula - seduction, tease, long build-up, release - taken as a whole the vids can become a bit tiresome and redundant, though this shouldn't take away from their value as individual erotic episodes. |
|
08-07-07 10:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
272
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks for the response. As I mentioned, I loved the site when I was a member, and I see it's only gotten better in the few years since. I will probably be subscribing again very shortly!
Thanks again.
|
08-01-07 08:43pm
|
Comment
273
|
Amateur Upskirts
(0)
|
|
07-31-07 10:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
274
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
07-31-07 10:26pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
275
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hi exotics4me,
Yes, Lenka is on ATK Exotics but there are only two pic sets, amounting to 147 pics. No vids at the moment. This is strange because I remember this model (and yes, she is amazing) from previous subscriptions to ATK, and I could have sworn that there were many more sets. The only ATK site I haven't joined is Premium. Could be they moved the majority of her sets there? I don't know.
It surprises me that, considering your username here, you haven't joined the ATK exotics site! I love exotics and I'm on my fourth go around.
Thanks for the reply.
|
07-29-07 08:47pm
|
|
