| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Reply
Doug!
Sorry I neglected to thank you for your explanation of the site's name! I'm surprised they have stuck with the name.
|
04-18-08 08:10pm
|
Reply
77
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
You're welcome, Wittyguy. Glad you liked my review. This whole raffle thing is kind of cool aint it? You wanna talk about making it big, check out exotics4me's winnings! Yikes! He might as well be on the payroll here!
Regards,
WWW :)
|
04-15-08 08:23pm
|
Reply
78
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler,
Thanks for the reply. When we do a review we sort of harp on the negatives, that's part and parcel of the whole thing; but when all is said and done, if the people behind this site were to take all the material they have and present it in a more accessible fashion, say, the way ATK does, then they would have one of the best sites going. Higher-res pics would be a good move - a necessary move now that it's 08, in my opinion - as would a slight drop in price, though that might be a problem only for those of us in the states.
To be truthful, I prefer the European approach to presenting beautiful young women, and the hardcore material, vid-wise I mean, comes across as being far less mysogynistic, and just less sleezy in general, compared to American porn. If Club Seventeen could manage to offer at least some of their DVDs in full, via download, now that would easily justify the 46 US dollars.
|
02-08-08 08:35pm
|
Review
79
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Tons of content.
- Very cute models.
- Stays within the teeny niche.
- *Some* of the video content is top notch.
- Newer pics are decent at 800x1200, and there are quite a few, to say the least. |
| Cons: |
- What the hell does Seventeen mean?
- Way ! too expensive for us yanks. 40+ buckaroos.
- Choices are great, but this site overwhelms you with choices, causing navigational havoc. See BL.
- Pic size could (should) go up a notch. Older pics are just too small for the jaded collector of 2008.
- No zips
- "High" quality option for vid downloads not so high, at least for the vids I checked. In fact, at 604 kbps, it looks dismal at full screen.
- Pages take too long to load because of all the fancy but useless pic-frame borders and variously-colored backgrounds. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was turned down at first by this site but they took me on my second try. So here goes:
I'm disappointed. Main problem: the site needs Organization. Categories are a good thing, but this place is category mayhem. There are 35+ picture-gallery categories, and a few of these are split into "gallery" and "archive". Some categories have separate numbered archives. In the vid section (which is called Seventeen Cinema [I think] and requires another log-in) there are 42 categories, or "labels". The vids are taken from full-length DVDs which you can order and are not entities unto themselves. Most vids offer high and low downloads. Some offer "full", which means highest quality: 2100 kbps, 720X540. These vids look great.
For pic collectors like Willy, who has short term memory loss in spades, all these categories are too much: blondes, brunettes, redheads, wet teens, shaved teens, kinky teens, schoolgirls, highschool girls, dirty teens, anal teens, left-handed teens, vertically-challenged teens, teens who read Proust.... you get the idea. There are some great sets and tons of cute models, but while I'm browsing and clicking I keep wondering what I might be missing someplace else. There is a model directory, but each name I clicked on merely took me to a set of four or five pics: not thumbs leading to sets or vids, just pictures! What's the point of a directory if it doesn't direct you to the model's content?
I'm running low on characters. BL: save your dough, yanks. |
|
02-07-08 11:29pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
80
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Drooler. I suppose I should be happy that I've saved 46 USD. It's just that I've been tempted by this site for so long I finally figured I'd give it a whirl.
|
01-03-08 08:18pm
|
Comment
81
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
|
01-02-08 09:45pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
82
|
College Uniform
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Stays unswervingly true to the uniform niche
- Beautiful models who know how to pose
- Jana Mrazkova! Yum.
- Hi quality pics, and lots of them. 38 gallery pages plus 7 bonus pages. Pics average 1000x1500 and they weigh in at nearly one meg each.
- Zip files for pics: a must for this type of site
- frequent updates
- Member forum and responsive webmaster
- Classy site in every sense
- Inexpensive trial gives you plenty of time to peruse the content |
| Cons: |
- Vid section is still small and quality is not on par with pics: avg 770-880 kbps, 640x480
- Navigation issues: Top navigation bar not showing up most of the time for me. You will need your back button if you have the same problem
- Quite a few links not working, but webmaster will fix if notified |
| Bottom Line: |
The strength of this site lies in the photo sections, and, as with LVpanty, the only reason I didn't rate it a 90 or higher is because the video section is not on par with the quality of the pics.
A too-brief pass through the material at this site can give you the wrong impression right from the start, as it did for me. A lot of the time the picture sets are broken up into separate galleries, with fully-clothed or mostly-clothed galleries coming first and the stripping content coming afterwards. There is plenty of skin here, though the only nudity is bare breasts. The undies are sublime. Upskirts and downblouse pics abound, and this site would be nirvana to a leg-man.
Subtlety is the key word here. It's decidedly on the soft end of softcore, and it's certainly not porn, at least not by my definition; but while the photos don't necessarily excite me they still manage to impress the hell out of me, and I'm not terribly interested in uniforms.
I posted a message about a misdirecting gallery-link in the forum at College Uniform and there was a response within two hours, as well as a fix. And this was on Christmas morning, no less.
I would highly recommend this site to people who are very interested in the niche, or just people who appreciate excellent photography and beautiful women. Those looking for anything beyond what the site promises will most likely be disappointed. |
|
12-26-07 10:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
83
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Lest this thread suffer the Wrath of Khan, a question about Cosmid: I wonder why the site is not in the busty niche, and doesn't seem to sell itself as a busty site. I've seen many samples at TGP's and I have yet to see a model who wasn't stacked to the rafters.
|
11-22-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
84
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Back Door Angels! Martin Barre at his finest. He is one of the most under-rated guitarists ever, probably because he has always played in Ian's shadow, which looms pretty damn large.
Mark Knopfler (sp?) of Dire Straits remarked that Barre's playing with Tull was "Magical." That's a good nod.
Here's a great clip of Barre at his best, for those who think Tull was nothing without Ian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv1Vy6iCcfI
|
11-21-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
85
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Holy crap, a Tull thread at PU! Jethro Tull happens to be my favorite band, ever since my brother came home in 1979 with a copy of the Songs From the Wood lp. He had been at a party in the woods and the album literally smelled like a campfire, plus it was ice cold, it being winter in upstate NY. Imagine how that helped with the whole woodsy, outdoorsy theme of that amazing album!
I've written a handful of Tull reviews at Amazon. I saw them twice in concert, but unfortunately I never saw them in their heyday.
|
11-21-09 07:10pm
|
Reply
86
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I thought it could be fun if done well. I joined this site because I am a big fan of the hand-job/CFNM niche. Unfortunately what I've seen so far is very disappointing. First, given six or seven minutes of a real, non-faked hand-job, the switch to the faked stuff is obvious because of terrible editing and terrible acting. It is not convincing at all, although if the participants tried a wee bit harder it could be a "blast".
Better to look for guys like Peter North who can do it for real (well, within reason!). There must be other males out there who could compete. ??
|
01-10-11 08:24pm
|
Reply
87
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks. I'll have a look.
|
12-20-07 02:32am
|
Comment
88
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
|
12-19-07 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content
- Some excellent video content
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024
- good bonus site on offer
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site. |
| Cons: |
- Non-exclusive material
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions.
Cute Panty Girls is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better.
Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports.
Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.
Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics. |
|
12-19-07 06:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
90
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Vids first, since that is most people's main interest:
I've only been a member for two days, but so far I've downloaded about a dozen or so vids. Two are long, good-quality (640x480,2000 kbps) handjob scenes where the only panty content is about thirty seconds in the beginning. Both clips are over eleven minutes long; two of the vids are lower quality (320x240,705 kbps) masturbation clips where the panties stay on, both about ten minutes long; then there's a very good quality (768x576, 2009 kbps) masturbation vid with toy which runs three minutes; there are also a few mild spanking vids here of fairly low to middling quality. There's a couple teaser vids and a stripping/interview vid. This is definitely a softcore site and NOT a non-nude site. It seems to me that it's a grab-bag of various types of content with panties figuring somewhere in the mix. Some of the material looks familiar, like the handjob vids, but I can't place them. There are lots of vids here and by the looks of the thumb-links there is more than likely more masturbation. As for the pics, same thing: a lot of the sets are similar to the ATK/Teen-Flood type of softcore: full nudity, occasional masturbation/toy stuff. The material is not exclusive, as I am sure I've seen quite a few sets at other sites. Again, the quality is hit and miss. Most of it is negligible.
|
12-13-07 12:34am
|
Comment
91
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 11:23pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
92
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Can't answer that I'm afraid, since I was never a member at One By Day.
|
01-20-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
93
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan,
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
|
01-20-09 01:40pm
|
Review
94
|
DDF Busty
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Top-notch videos in multiple DL options.
- Top-notch pics in variety of sizes.
- Zips for all pic sets.
- Beautiful, professional models.
- Picture sets are well-edited, not fifty shots of same pose.
- Vids can be sampled in streaming format, with two quality options.
- Model index. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a bit odd. You can't get to video content without seeing at least the first page of the accompanying picture set.
- Pics are hyper-glamorous, with models in full make-up, and pics seem touched-up. This could be a pro for some.
- Not a huge amount of content for the price.
- Older pics are smallish.
- Some vids contain cheesy music.
- Set backgrounds are often unappealing, with some highly questionable "art" on the walls. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lot of websites could stand to learn a great deal about customer service by perusing the DDF site. User-friendly features abound, such as pics and vids in a variety of formats, and streaming video for sampling the video prior to download. The streaming feature alone can potentially save on tons of frustration, boredom, wasted time, and wasted disk space.
I haven't seen a site with more video options. Various levels of quality in WMV, DivX, and Quicktime, plus low quality mpeg for slow connections. I opted for the 2026k, 852x480 WMV, since I can't view a bigger size, but this was very satisfactory.
The picture sets are very well-done, well-edited, and come in two to three sizes, and all zipped. My tastes do not tend toward the glamorous, and I actually prefer amateur models, but objectively speaking you would find it hard to beat this site for what it offers.
A site like this, which is willing to put in the extra work in order to make things more convenient for paying customers, makes me wonder how some of the truly lame competition can survive for very long.
I highly recommend this site, particularly for those who have a bent for busty models, but even for those who don't. |
|
01-19-09 02:23pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
95
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
True, badandy, but allow me to explain why music ruins the experience of video for me, especially regarding solo models.
First, I am at an age where I don't look for this type of stuff solely to get off in a sexual way. For me, I enjoy the whole sensual experience of watching a beautiful woman strip and move and do various things, on video, and particularly if the vid is of decent quality. I've got good speakers and I like to keep the volume up a good ways. I want to hear the sound of high heels on a solid wood floor - something that you get in spades at a site like In The Crack. I want to hear the sound of the girl's clothing crinkling and rustling, the sound of her hands on it, the sound of female hands on nylon, the jingle of jewelry, the clicks and clacks and thuds and bumps of a warm human female in close quarters with ME. I like the ambient sounds in the room to a certain extent, though these should be kept to a minimum. Each sound generated by the girl, the floor, her clothes, her body, constitute another point of contact between her and me. If there is music, all these subtle points of contact are destroyed, or non-existent, and watching in silence doesn't help to generate a sense of union with the model, a sense of actually sharing the same and space.
It isn't just music that destroys the experience for me, but a chatty narrator is also a downer, in a serious way. The person behind the camera should be as anonymous as possible, a silent conduit between me and the girl.
Many sites seem to be doing silent videos now - silent as in no music and no talking - and I hope the trend catches on. In The Crack is by far the best for a one-on-one sensual encounter with a beautiful woman, with Panty Amateur a close second. I was hoping that DDF would give me much of the same, but thus far I am finding that at least half of the newest solo vids feature a music track, and the ones that don't seem to be deficient to some degree in sound quality, although that may be on my end. I must say I am a bit disappointed thus far, although the pic sets are top notch.
|
12-06-08 07:57pm
|
Comment
96
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
|
12-05-08 04:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
97
|
Dirty Lilly
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lilly!
- Zips for pic sets (one file, not per-page)
- Single-file video downloads, HQ offered (943kbps), options for Flash, WMV hq/lq.
- Plenty of hardcore: should be plus for hc fans
- Good amount of content for the price, and good quality
- Lilly has a great sense of humor |
| Cons: |
- Diary section updated recently, but it seems comments are removed, since there are no comments for any of the entries save one: "hot body! i want it!" My kind regards were deleted (sniff...sniff...Lilly hurt Willy...)
- no email address in sight
- I'm pretty sure the vid and pic sections haven't been updated since I joined a few weeks ago |
| Bottom Line: |
Lilly stands out from the crowd of single-model site personalities because of two things: First, she has a great sense of humor which comes across in her videos as much as it does in her text entries through-out the site (if it's not really Lilly writing that stuff in her sweet, mixed-up English then shame on them and shame on me for being such a dufus). Second, she has a great rapport with the camera and beautiful, expressive eyes which I guarantee will imprint themselves in your memory if you give them the chance. That's quite a compliment when you consider it comes from someone who ganders at inaccessible female eyes an awful lot in his spare time and instantly forgets most of them.
Lilly is not drop-dead gorgeous unless she's in make-up, and she has a problem with her teeth which is the cause of one section of her site called "Donate me retainer". You can donate money to her so that she can get her "teeth-aid" and hence have a prettier smile. Yikes, either this is the tackiest thing ever or her site isn't doing well at all.
Lilly has spectacular breasts as well as captivating eyes and claims they're natural. I see no scars in sight. Vids are shot by her boyfriend and the two make a good team: he's well-endowed and the money shots are good; there's a lot of hardcore: sex, oral, insertions, toys, graphic close-ups, as well as softcore.
My polite comment in her diary got deleted. This seems to be their policy, however. That sucks. Points off for that.
Follow-Up:
The quality is better than 943kbps in a lot of the videos. Some go up to 1500+. |
|
11-06-07 12:46am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
98
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Holy crap, Monahan, I only just noticed this in my swamped email account. In case you never opted for a sub here, it's a great site! The vids are great. Some of them are too talky for me, but there are also plenty where the model is not talking. No silly music tracks! Lots of wonderful boobies!
WWW.
|
06-12-14 05:40am
|
Comment
99
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
|
04-05-11 03:40am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
100
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Thanks for the warning. I hope not only that the site dies, but I wish the person behind all those pop-ups would have the guts to come here and explain the reasoning behind that kind of bullshit. I don't blame anyone for wanting to make money, or even for exploiting the naivete and/or gullability of certain people. I wouldn't do it myself but I recognize it as all a part of the game. However, the kind of crap that you describe, apoctom, is not salesmanship in any way, shape or form.
Imagine being at a car dealership and this guy is showing you a car. You say, "That's okay, not interested," and suddenly the guy yanks you by the arm and shoves you into the car. "Come on, start it up!" he cries, and then when you try and get out of the car, he leans up against the door. You go for the other side, and there's another "salesman" blocking that door, and all the while they're shouting at you, demanding that you start the car and think more about whether it interests you or not. You start the car and slam it into reverse, trying to get away from the two idiots, but there's another idiot who's just parked a big truck behind you. "Come on," they all shout, "You know you want this car...just sign the fucking contract and we'll let you go!"
It would be no worse than what the idiots behind all that pop-up hell are doing.
|
04-17-08 05:15pm
|
|
