| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I suppose it's all about role play, but for me it never adds anything to the video and normally takes away from it if the acting is done with any form of conviction.
|
10-27-12 04:38am
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I voted other, as I believe good scenes can be shot in all of those examples, although I have seen bad examples of each of them, too.
With a good mic and sound balance, I don't think the noise of a running shower has ever been intrusive to the point it has bothered me. The worst aspect from shooting in the shower is that it's quite confined and often limiting in terms of camera angles etc, but some of my favourite scenes have been shower scenes.
Outside - yes, often blighted with bad lighting, but I have seen some fantastic examples of outdoor scenes where the lighting has been fantastic. I think scenes outside give a feeling of jeopardy and again, a lot of my favourite scenes have been outdoor.
Bedroom is a bit unoriginal, but what it lacks in originality it makes up for in versatility. Lots of scope for interesting angles etc, easy to set up good lighting etc.
Old warehouse - must admit this is probably the rarer of the locations listed, but sometimes I think the contrast of natural beauty in terms of the model vs industrial ugliness is a nice contrast. I would say poor lighting is often more of an issue in warehouse shoots than outdoor shoots. I think there's something quite appealing about a beautiful girl against a desolate backdrop, it's also quite easy to lose yourself in the fantasy of it, too.
|
10-17-12 12:28am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, nobody else uses my computer, and I guess most passwords can easily be hacked if people are really that desperate to get onto my computer which has nothing particularly of interest to anyone on anyway.
|
10-15-12 12:43pm
|
Reply
354
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
The 50,000 pics claim will probably include her older site, although haven't double-checked those details I must admit. Will probably join her site if I get the necessary clearance (!) in a month or so - fingers crossed I can save the content.
|
10-14-12 02:09pm
|
Reply
355
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Oh good - hopefully I will receive the necessary clearance from Ann Angel to actually join her site, then I will do a comprehensive review! Will wait for a month-or-so until there's more content on there.
|
10-13-12 05:51am
|
Reply
356
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Apologies, I should have mentioned - it's on the News page, here: http://www.annangelxxx.com/?news=nunc-laoreet
|
10-13-12 05:39am
|
Reply
357
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Seems that her site has now opened for business now, but it says each account will be individually verified:
"All accounts will be VERIFIED. So please provide a valid number and address when you register. If I can not get in touch with the account holder, the account will be closed down immediately. The good part is you get a call from me directly! How cool is that? So you know who I am, it’s only fair I know you. This helps protect legitimate accounts like yours, protect my content, and also is kind of fun!
We are also taking other steps in securing accounts as well, but those you don’t need to worry about. Just sit back, relax, and have fun! If you’re here to just enjoy me and not steal from my site, you have absolutely nothing to worry about."
|
10-13-12 01:23am
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not really affected what sites I sign up to, but I suspect it has affected the porn industry which would end up affecting me.
|
10-09-12 11:57am
|
Reply
359
|
Barbi Sinclair
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thank you - appreciated.
Hard to tell whether it was just the preview that was out of date, whether it was just representative of the member's content, or if there really haven't been many videos in the last year.
Thanks again, and thanks for the recommendation of Mandy Tyler.
|
10-07-12 01:50pm
|
Reply
360
|
Barbi Sinclair
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Thanks for the great review. What are update schedules like? Nothing seems to be dated in the preview section and there's a Christmas tree in only the seventh video preview, so I'm thinking that there's only been six updates since Christmas?
|
10-07-12 10:37am
|
Reply
361
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Oh dear, yes, that's rather unfortunate - I didn't even check. That would have been an even shorter review!
|
10-05-12 11:55am
|
Comment
362
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
|
10-05-12 10:25am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not keen, but I think it's a case of there being a little too much as opposed to it being unavoidable.
|
10-05-12 10:23am
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If there's a discount, I would consider it. But mainly no. I quite often let my membership lapse into a second month, but would normally take a month-or-so off and then rejoin once there's more content.
I tend to like smaller amateur websites rather than huge networks, so there's not the volume of updates to normally make it value for money.
|
10-01-12 10:51pm
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends. If it's just one image tucked away somewhere, I'd probably give it the benefit of the doubt, but if there's more than one, or it's in an obvious place etc, I would be quite cynical about the website as there could be links to galleries not working once inside.
|
09-28-12 09:56am
|
Reply
366
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ah, OK, in that case that's definitely a bit suss, or at best an unfortunate coincidence. Was their joining page secure with the padlock etc? Pretty shocking. Hope you enjoyed Kuala Lumpur :D
|
09-28-12 09:51am
|
Reply
367
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Do you know if it was actually compromised, or did your bank wrongly assume that the transaction for the site was the fraud, as that's what's happened before with me?
Glad to hear it's not too much hassle, hope you get everything sorted soon :)
|
09-25-12 11:20pm
|
Reply
368
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I'm surprised a website wouldn't use an independent biller for their peace of mind, let alone anybody else's.
I'm sure the website is trustworthy and your card wasn't compromised as in my experience credit card companies use automatic algorithms to build a pattern of credit card use, and anything that falls outside that (ie, a charge directly to a website you've not used before which doesn't use a biller) would be enough for them to block your card to err on the side of caution.
Hope it didn't cause you too much inconvenience though!
|
09-25-12 12:46am
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to pick my own, just because then it's easier to remember, but I can see why websites automatically issue passwords because I'm sure some people's passwords are very weak.
I've never had a problem with websites that automatically issue passwords - the password is normally emailed, appears on the confirmation page and has always worked for me straight away.
|
09-25-12 12:41am
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
One of my all time favourite models seems to do nothing but pee scenes now and I just hate it, I really do :(
|
09-23-12 01:41pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Currently via a USB stick, but will get an HDMI cable at some stage.
|
09-21-12 09:46am
|
Reply
372
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the reply.
I'm glad Twisty's managed to sort the problem out. I think that's what's annoying me in that I absolutely know I didn't break the T&Cs, and I'm sure with a bit of investigation the Bryci webmaster would have seen that, but he was on the defensive straight away and to be honest, don't think he could be bothered investigating. He's very quick to call people liars though.
I totally understand webmasters protecting their content, but clearly it's not an exact science. I find it 'strange' that this has clearly happened at least twice with Bryci's website, and that's just with members here.
|
09-16-12 12:17pm
|
Reply
373
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
merrell's Comment
This is quite interesting as exactly the same happened to me when I joined Bryci. See my brief review here: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=67901
The webmaster called me a liar too, even though I absolutely did not share my password or download anything approaching that limit. He says '10 videos doesn't get you banned' yet it did. So something's wrong.
Even when I love a model I am choosy about what I download and have never ever hit download limits on any of the websites I have ever joined.
The only mitigating factor I could think of in my circumstance was that I had problems with my internet connection so maybe my IP number changed. The webmaster wouldn't even entertain that notion and did his whole 'if you read the T&Cs...' spiel.
It's among the worst customer service I have ever experienced at a website, and it almost put me off ever joining a website again. I'm still incredibly bitter about the fact I was treated like a criminal.
|
09-15-12 02:21pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
By the old name, but if it wasn't just for a guest appearance on a site (eg, she moved to another site permanently under the new name), I'd probably rename the folder to include the new name in brackets, eg: 'Karla (Casandra)' ...with Casandra being the new name.
|
09-15-12 08:16am
|
Reply
375
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
To be fair, the downloading content problem was only one of my complaints. I think my membership will be worthwhile as I like Francine and some of the pictures are great, but it's definitely not the kind of site I'd recommend, let alone join again.
|
09-07-12 02:09pm
|
