| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1026
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files Available
- Great Models
- Good Price |
| Cons: |
- Not Many Videos
- Navigation Could Be Better
- Not A Huge Amount Of Material |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been getting into these so-called "glamour" sites lately, mostly for the photos. This is one of the better examples of these sort of sites. The models here are really hot, let's face it--Europe is blowing away the U.S. as far as erotica is concerned at the moment. The girls are just a lot better looking. The problem at this site is that they don't yet have enough models or sets to justify a multi month membership as of yet. I got everything I wanted in my 1 month membership, but what great stuff it is! The photos are hi-res, and great looking. The photography is a lot more erotic than that of similiar sites. Not a lot of "statue posing" here. You can choose up to 5000 pix(!), but as I said, as of this review there are only 85 models. They have HD video also, not a whole lot yet. Personally, I find the "glamour" vids boring, but that's my prejudice---if that's your cup of tea, you won't be disappointed I guess. You can choose between wmv and quicktime. But back to the photos, I love them! They're in the magazine style, with titles like "Provoking Cock"! The navigation---while the member's area is very attractive, the navigation is a bit irritating. You click the model, go to her page. You click her picture, get the sets. You click a set, and then you have to click the cover, and then you're finally there! And they don't include the cover in the set, you have to save the hi-res cover and place it in yourself. Site is updated frequently. it will be better in a year. |
|
08-07-07 10:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
1027
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
71.0
|
No Review.
|
08-07-07 09:20pm
|
Comment
1028
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
|
08-07-07 04:39am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1029
|
Best Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Believe it or not I wrote to a certain site to ask them to stop videotaping men playing with themselves, but they laughed at me!
|
08-06-07 06:51pm
|
Reply
1030
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I did have a problem also, and they wrote me back. They are having trouble with CCBill, which they say they don't like at all, and are in the process of setting up alternative billing options. I did get into there today though. Looks great. The new sets are separate, the old are stored in an attractive archive.****I see by your other reply that you were already a member there. I had triuble getting in initially, for the reason I wrote****
|
08-06-07 01:22am
|
Reply
1031
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Make user/passes like this: h8HQsHkX95ysw2hl ---copy it into a note, and place it on your desktop and copy and paste!
|
08-06-07 01:19am
|
Reply
1032
|
Meat Holes
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
I agree---it's hard to find stuff there.
|
08-06-07 01:16am
|
Reply
1033
|
Best Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Review
I'll never understand why these porn producers think we want to watch some guy pull his pud, polish his bayonet, or choke his chicken. They should edit that junk out of the video!
|
08-06-07 01:13am
|
Reply
1034
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
lespaul76's Reply
Another guy who makes proper POV's is the guy at 3rd Degree who does the "Hand To Mouth" series, I can't remember his name, but you can see them at the site. POV is supposed to be the girl performing and talking to the viewer.
|
08-03-07 02:30am
|
Comment
1035
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
|
08-03-07 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1036
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I don't use my credit card----I use a prepaid debit card, totally safe, and you don't even have to use your real name or address.
|
08-03-07 01:53am
|
Reply
1037
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
And do you notice a lot of modern porn refuses to use attractive sex positions? When was the last time you saw the "missionary position"? Not what they call the missionary position, but the actual position. I think 1987 was the last time i saw that one. And the stupid ass slapping, and the disgusting spitting on girls genitals, like some pervert in an adult store peepshow! No wonder there aren't any attractive girls left in American porn!
|
08-03-07 01:51am
|
Reply
1038
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Sams's Review
I can think of a big con---the models are very plain, some unnatractive.
|
08-03-07 01:46am
|
Reply
1039
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
A total pet peeve of mine as well!
|
08-02-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
1040
|
Caballero Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornjackker's Review
Looks like a good site, thanks for the review.
|
08-02-07 07:08pm
|
Reply
1041
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You're right, it was a mess...you're tempting me to re-join
|
08-02-07 12:46am
|
Reply
1042
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I hate circus porn!
|
08-02-07 12:39am
|
Reply
1043
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
That does look good, now it's called one by day, one by night. I see they are using the magazine format also. Thanks for the update.
|
07-30-07 07:51pm
|
Reply
1044
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
Forget limited trials. All I want to see when I peek into a site is a photo list of the models with perhaps one sample for each. Teen Dreams does that, and it's good business sense. Limited trials make a site look unappealing, especially if they are giving away cheesy free samples.
|
07-30-07 04:24am
|
Review
1045
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Price
- Lots And Lots Of NS Material
- A Lot Of Quality Bonus Material For The Money
- NS Model Search, Including Greats Like Tera Patrick Before She Disfigured Herself! |
| Cons: |
- Photos Are Small
- Video Options Could Be Better |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a fan of New Sensations from the days when Tera Patrick, Jewel De'Nyle, and yes, Jenna Jameson worked there-all their material is here. And don't forget the great work Peter North did for them-he has his own section. They have a search section for all the models that ever worked for them and it's huge. Lots of things I never saw. The bonus sites are almost too good for the price, You can find them listed at the site, it does include Jizz Bomb with 51 pages of material. I would say this site has the best bonuses out there. Unfortunately, the photos there are small, even the newer ones, around 500x750. They aren't screencaps either. It's too bad, because there are a lot of stars there suitable for collecting. They still use real media (!) as an option for their videos!! Does anyone have .rm videos!! they've got to lose those! The wmv are 640x480. But you get Taylor St.Claire and her bouncing breasts! wow, talk about the good ol' days! If the photos were hi-res, i would spend many months there. As it is, I think it's a great site for people who have a knowledge of porn, and like seeing their old favorites, and new ones as well. |
|
07-30-07 04:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1046
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
Thanks for the update.
|
07-30-07 03:45am
|
Reply
1047
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
They have eliminated the dreaded DRM altogether?? That would be great news.
|
07-30-07 03:37am
|
Reply
1048
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
barnowl's Comment
Just say NO to DRM sites!!
|
07-29-07 03:48pm
|
Reply
1049
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I would date Traci Lords, she's about my age !
|
07-28-07 04:45am
|
Reply
1050
|
10-Man Cum Slam
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Review
I have a few of these DVD's---the girls are brave!
|
07-28-07 04:42am
|
