| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Well, if you haven't joined it yet, like me, there's a ton of material there. I would join for a month, and not worry about the updates. If you joined before, it's a different story.
|
09-16-07 04:33am
|
Reply
952
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
Maybe it'll be a landslide, but I've grown to hate trials. You have to remember to cancel, some sites charge an outrageous recurring charge. I'd rather have a very good site preview, like FTV Girls. I've given up on trials.
|
09-16-07 04:28am
|
Reply
953
|
JJ Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
I think I will...the best DVD I ever saw was Gina Lynn Darkside...I'm sure you've seen all the scenes on this site!
|
09-15-07 03:26pm
|
Reply
954
|
JJ Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
I don't mean to "correct" you, it's just that your review made me want to join! I know from his DVD's extras, that they often show him photographing the models. But they are very low res for a millionaire porn producer!
|
09-15-07 03:16pm
|
Reply
955
|
JJ Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
But the photos on the preview page are not screencaps. For instance, I own the video with Nautica Thorn, and i know that is not a screencap
|
09-15-07 03:10pm
|
Reply
956
|
JJ Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
I notice on the preview page that he advertises 800px photosets, and owning some of his DVD's I know for a fact that they contain photosets. Are you sure the site only has screencaps? The site looks a lot better than it used to look.
|
09-15-07 03:07pm
|
Comment
957
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
09-15-07 02:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
958
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I wished to have to review deleted due to my serious mistake which rendered it meaningless, but for some reason the webmaster refused. So I have edited what is here.
|
09-15-07 02:26pm
|
Reply
959
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I've asked the webmaster here to delete my review. i saw the link you spoke of just now, it was not there previously, I know because I checked and double checked. It was not there.
|
09-13-07 10:56pm
|
Reply
960
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Nope, it's no good. i just looked in the preview---no Riley Mason! Swine!
|
09-13-07 12:37am
|
Reply
961
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
If it was $29.95, I would seriously consider it, it doesn't look too bad. Maybe one of you weekly winners should take one for the team and check this site out Lol.
|
09-13-07 12:26am
|
Reply
962
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
tcman's Review
Well, all the photos are zipped now...but that's because they removed a lot of sets.
|
09-13-07 12:16am
|
Reply
963
|
Arab Street Hookers
(0)
|
Reply of
juanito's Comment
Thanks for the warning.
|
09-13-07 12:15am
|
Reply
964
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
There's only one problem---the models at AW are about as plain as that paint you mention.
|
09-12-07 11:32pm
|
Reply
965
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Early on I made the mistake of reviewing a site without being in long enough. Now I generally wait a month, or earlier if i was a member there before. But after comparing it later on to similar sites, sometimes an adjustment is necessary.
|
09-12-07 11:25pm
|
Reply
966
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Review
If you think it's "creepy" there, you should read my "Little Lupe" review! the guys on that site look like sex offenders!
|
09-10-07 10:18pm
|
Reply
967
|
Cover My Face
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Review
i ask myself all the time why these porn producers imagine that we want to watch guys play with themselves?!
|
09-10-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
968
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree about DDF in the "Hall Of Fame". I once had a problem with one of their sites that took a few days to correct, and they gave me a free month membership to the DDF site of my choice!
|
09-10-07 10:09pm
|
Reply
969
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
turismo's Reply
I like the ability to leave comments there too. And have left a few! My favorites were when guys were waiting for the new update, and you'd get "OMG! Not ANOTHER midget video!".
|
09-10-07 10:04pm
|
Reply
970
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Well Denner, i gave it an 85 I believe, and said i would rather pay more for higher quality. You're right--I am an old timer Lol! I think if someone never saw porn before, VB videos would be good enough. I'd rather pay for quality myself
|
09-10-07 10:01pm
|
Reply
971
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I had a comment about this---the Suzedotnet customer service contacted me very quickly in the middle of the night. I once had one tell me if I didn't like it, i could cancel my membership, which i promptly did!
|
09-10-07 12:33am
|
Reply
972
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Maybe the survey there is an indication of a complete overhaul in the works.
|
09-10-07 12:30am
|
Reply
973
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I think the high score is for the cheap price. But along with the cheap price comes less than premium videos. It's a trade off.
|
09-09-07 05:14pm
|
Comment
974
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
|
09-09-07 02:03am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
975
|
Diabolic Web
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I tried it...the photos they give aren't good at all. If what they show during the trial is what you get for $34.95, it isn't even close to being worth it. I looked around for an hour, cancelled the trial, and never went back.
|
09-08-07 02:53pm
|
