| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with Randyman - hologram would be cooler than 3D.
|
06-26-13 04:44am
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My main rig is a laptop so I keep my entire collection on an external (I know performance suffers a little when I load up a new video, but that seems better than using up my internal storage).
|
06-26-13 04:43am
|
Reply
428
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
With cheap hard drives I keep more than ever before. But I've also realize a new problem - there are still only so many hours in a day. My new system is to download anything I might like, sorting it later with no reservations about deleting.
|
06-22-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Agreed needed a none option. I picked strip clubs since I've been to one within the last year for a bachelor party. I still have some magazines a videos but hardly ever take them out.
|
06-15-13 11:50am
|
Reply
430
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
maybe once or twice
|
06-05-13 01:56pm
|
Reply
431
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Hi Pat,
Would the gentleman yield for a question?
If the site is "near perfect..." why not give it the perfect 100. You're not like my 7th grade English teacher are you? She would never award an A+ because something could always be better, in which case a 96 (A) is actually a 100.
In a nut shell, Why not give them what they deserve? (perhaps my question is better asked on the sister site porn fidelity, where you awarded a well deserved 98)
|
05-31-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
432
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Buddhist you don't mean what I think you mean do you?
:)
|
05-31-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I have a dl holding area and then I sort; generally by model; somethings by theme (and shortcuts to link the files that go in both)
At the moment I haven't cleaned up in a while and there's about 75 gigs that need to be sorted through.
|
05-28-13 06:52pm
|
Review
434
|
Brazzers
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- $20/month is a fair price for a ton of content
- over 5,000 scenes
- good clean organization; multiple ways to search - keyword, star, type, etc
- live shows (I skipped these when I was a member so I can't comment about them)
- about 30 sites with a range of genres from interracial to milfs and teens, there just about everything you could be looking for (especially if that's big boobs)
- high res pix and video. Video is 1920X1080 about 5.5 mbps
- videos available in .mp4 and .wmv
- major payer in porn so they shoot most major stars - if you have a favorite I'd be surprised if she hasn't shot for Brazzers.
- multiple updates per week.
- cleaver setups (they follow the basic porn formula but they're also have fun - parodies, holiday setups, etc.)
- long videos (generally 20 minutes or more) |
| Cons: |
- majority of models skew toward big boobs (meaning mostly fakes).
- not all sites are still updating. That may have been clear before I joined, but I didn't notice it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Brazzers is one of the main stays in the online porn game. They're worth checking out if you haven't before; but don't kid yourself about what you'll get. You get mainstream porn. Good quality mainstream - but mainstream none the less. If you're looking for anything off the beaten path, or something that doesn't follow the standard porn formula this isn't going to provide it.
With more than 5,000 shoot you can find something that scratches your itch, but you don't see anything unique here. |
|
05-27-13 07:16pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
435
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- great production value. He uses a wireless mic on the girls and tons of lighting so you can see everything.
- A unique light is used which makes a model's eyes "pop" it's very drawing and striking.
- giant catalog with over 500 videos
- great quality 1440X1080 7.5 mbps
- .wmv and .mp4 available
- all exclusive content
- pictures available with zips |
| Cons: |
- Every shoot follows the same linear progression. The girls may be smokin' hot - but even I have to say it gets boring.
- some anal, 3ways, handjobs etc. but there really is no variety to speak of.
- Girls shoot under different names for this site. So you may have a favorite and won't be able to find her.
- Pricy especially considering there's no partnering sites.
- preview section is a highlight reel. I like to see inside a few scenes to get a better sense of the action. I CAN NOT say I was in any way deceived. This is a quality site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Each shoot has the same routine. Hot girl in a nice dress (like what she wore to the prom or something). She blows him, he takes her in a couple o f different positions. She takes is load in her mouth. They go at it again; he usually finishes with a facial.
The quality on this site is top notch - but the same thing over and over is dull.
This is a good site. They could sure mix it up a little bit, or reach out so some partners so there's more variety.
Every shoot is a winner, (but here you quickly get the feeling "seen one seen them all") |
|
05-27-13 05:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
436
|
Mr. POV
(0)
|
|
05-27-13 02:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
437
|
The Dick Suckers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great direction. Iv'e seen many of these girls on other sites and their best work is always here.
- Male talent stays out of the way so it's more about the girl's performance. (nothing is worse than male talent trying to make it about him)
- 1920X1080 about 5.5 mbps.
- good combination of established stars and up and
comers. You never know who you will see next.
- clean organization; chronological and by favorite star.
- Network: you also get manojob.com and mrpov.
- Huge catalog with over 500 videos.
- stream through .flv, or download in wmv or mp4
- updates 1/week
- back catalog stretches back to 2005
- great dirty talkin' (my favorite part of porn) |
| Cons: |
- A few sites deviate from all oral; but like the name says: it's just dick sucking
- $30/month is a little pricey (but I can't at all argue with the quality)
- can't do a keyword search "redheads" for example
- no zip downloads for pix |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like this site. It's one of my all time favorite. I think their production value and attention to detail is topped only by kink.com. TDS has great audio and lighting so you hear the girl playing with herself during the performance. It's some of the hottest content on the net.
I wish they had some more aggressive pricing; but like is often noted in the PU formum, porn is under increased competition - so I understand the position they're in. Like I said above you get a very polished product for your dollar. I was satisfied :)
The site is packaged with manojob (a handjob site) and mr. pov. These are a good mix cause they round out the mainstream porn content. If I were to offer any expansion I would say to add an all anal site - but maybe that's just shooting for the moon. |
|
05-27-13 02:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
438
|
Sexually Broken
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Great Review Mbaya, thanks for adding this!
They also have a really good preview pages for those considering joining!
|
05-26-13 05:47pm
|
Reply
439
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
THANKS!
I'll check it out. I've seen some of their work, and it wasn't exactly what I'm looking for. But maybe I just need to give them a second look.
|
05-26-13 05:42pm
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm not as interested in pix. To me I want to see a decent set of Video previews. I say there should be about a dozen, to show of the different type of content, and the length should be at lease 3 minutes.
|
05-26-13 08:29am
|
Comment
441
|
Housewife Kelly
(0)
|
|
05-26-13 08:25am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
442
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I've certainly deleted stuff that I thought would be "gold standard" keepers.
I've also accidentally deleted things that I regret; such is life
|
05-24-13 06:42pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
They're fun, but rarely do fruitful discussions grow out of them.
Please don't take them away I like the random banter that sometimes pops up.
|
05-23-13 01:55pm
|
Reply
444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
to be fair I think women watch porn to be "Perverted " who doesn't enjoy breaking away from all the goodness of reality to enjoy some of the excitement of fantasy?
|
05-22-13 06:42pm
|
Reply
445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm the goldie locks of breasts, not too big; not too small: just right.
|
05-22-13 06:40pm
|
Reply
446
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
LeluLove Co's Reply
I'm just a satisfied customer. Thanks for making such a terrific website!
|
05-20-13 07:58pm
|
Comment
447
|
Filthy Cute Online
(0)
|
|
05-20-13 06:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
448
|
Amateur Key Club
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- About a dozen sites to enjoy
- Almost all interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- sites all focus on slut wives and has a raunchy focus.
The girls are amateur and attractive. There's a range of ages and body weight so I'm sure lovers of hot wives/cuckolding will find someone they like.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
- quite a bit of content for a low, low price |
| Cons: |
- Not all site have .zip downloads.
- They claim to still be updating. They're not.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is not consistent across network sites.
- videos are only in .wmv
- they claim to give access to 28 sites. I can't get into everything the show on the home page (I still need to contact customer service about that, but I'm real reluctant based on my current experience).
- By all right I should put this score lower, but I feel that fact that there is so much here for such a ridiculously low price deserves some consideration. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't pay a lot for this network so I'm trying to be generous, but i can't lie and say I'm satisfied. I'm not.
The potential is so high, and the delivery so bad. Bad production, bad UI, bad marketing (don't tell me you update if you don't). Some of the sites have videos that were started and not finished (or the rest of the video is slowly being dolled out with 1 minute long updates. To be honest I haven't even bothered to check that claim cause it's too much of a pain. Who want to wait a month to see the next minute of video?)
This whole network is stuck in 2001, and it's not pretty. |
|
05-20-13 06:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
449
|
Interracial Video.net
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- you get access to over 20 sites with membership
- Sites are almost exclusively interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps. |
| Cons: |
- The sites are inconsistent in terms of layout, so you have to learn the ins and outs of each.
- models range from smokin' hot (whoring out my wife) to GILFs (not a big draw for me).
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- some sites offer zip pictures, some don't there's no rhyme or reason.
- claims of new updates are lies (hate to say it but I'm calling BS on this one) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the most confusing network I've ever joined. I like to think of myself as reasonable intelligent, but this experience challenged that assumption.
Granted i got the network for a fantastic price ($30/year is probably the cheapest porn I've ever bought), but I didn't get much for my money and probably would have gotten more enjoyment if I'd just hit the preview pages of the dogfart network.
While I can't say it was from this, I did notice an uptick in the spam to my email associated with this membership. It may be a coincidence - or it may be they sold my email address.
I've had this membership for almost 5 months and I still haven't checked out all the sites. Not because there's so much content (there isn't) but because it's not that compelling. I love raunchy sex (and there's some of that here) but the production quality is so low and the navigation is so hamstrung it's not worth the trouble. |
|
05-20-13 06:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
450
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
|
05-19-13 12:12pm
Replies (2)
|
