| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
The main source for locating porn sites would definately be TBP.
After hearing good reviews about Videobox from elsewhere and checking out the site, they had a snippet of their TBP review on the front page.. which I checked out.
Glad I did because TBP is truely great. And it's thanks to TBP that I found out about PU!
|
07-12-07 03:43pm
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think it's a great turn-on when it's genuine.
The messier the better!
|
07-12-07 03:41pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Fingering/licking gets my vote.
It's penetration in it's own right.
|
07-12-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I usually spend only around $20-30 per month.
It's difficult to say though because sometimes I join a site for a year, which usually means big savings over the monthly rate.
|
07-12-07 03:39pm
|
Review
130
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Great price (especially with TBP bonus).
-Good variety of content for various niches.
-Content won't be found elsewhere.
-No DRM. |
| Cons: |
-Not the best video quality.
-Picture quality can be poor.
-Updates timing seems random.
-Navigation difficult at times. |
| Bottom Line: |
All things considered, New Sensations for me was a pretty average site. One that I didn't let my rebill occur for, and that I haven't rejoined since.
There is some good content there, such as Nacho's Killer Pussy, a site that I'd probably rate higher than 76 on a single review, but the network as a whole can't be focused on one site.
The major problems for me with the network was the video quality. I like high quality, clear videos. Some of the newer ones were what I would call "OK" quality, but nothing great. The older videos are poor though, and some are in Real format. For me, that's a problem. MPEG/WMV is by far the preferred choice.
Also, the search engine needs improving. There is content on some of the network sites that fail to show up in a search. This makes it pretty useless as it can't be relied upon.
But the content is fairly hardcore and doesn't contain DRM, so it is yours to keep after your membership lapses.
Probably worth joining if you like the content on offer, but keep in mind that you may be disappointed by the picture/video quality. |
|
07-12-07 04:21am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Yeah it's pretty nice if the girl is attractive and lots of soap is used heh, but there are better things.
Perhaps the most important part in shower scenes is the breasts.
|
07-12-07 04:05am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I agree entirely!
|
07-12-07 04:03am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I think anonymous trust ratings are okay if it's a Yes.. but if someone's going to say that they don't trust a user, then they need to provide some sort of reason as to why.
Perhaps it would be better if anonymous trust ratings weren't allowed.
And as people have said, you're going to get people who give you a "No" vote out of spite.
|
07-12-07 04:01am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think so, just like many computer software has a trial.
Potential customers would like to see inside the members area, and exactly what they could get with a full-blown membership. I feel that site's that don't offer any kind of trial membership perhaps have something to hide. Maybe their content isn't as advertised on the signup page?
Although there are a few sneaky sites, that if one subscribes to the trial that lasts 3 days for example, after that if the rebills haven't been cancelled, it not only converts to a full-blown membership, but it's a premium price membership, more expensive that it would normally be.
One of the networks that come to mind for doing this is Bangbros.
So in a nutshell, trials are great and should be offered by sites.. but they shouldn't rebill. You pay say $5 for a 3 day trial, and after 3 days that's it.
|
07-12-07 03:59am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
For me, the review length/quality pays a big part.
If the reviewer has just written a barely approved review to get a point, what's to say it's going to be accurate?
I'd also compare the review against my own experience If I'd been a member of the site, which would have a big effect on whether or not I'd trust the user.
|
07-12-07 03:55am
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
Whilst I don't tend to look at pictures that much, I'm more into videos, I think that photo-shopping/correction shouldn't be used really.
I like to know that what I'm looking at is real, and the picture is true to form.
Even if the complexion is bad, leave the pictures alone!
|
07-12-07 03:53am
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hmm..
Fisting is alright as long as it's girl-girl.
Although it's not something I'm particularly Interested in, but I don't object to it either.
|
07-12-07 03:48am
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most definately.
My computer hardware budget money tends to be spent mainly on external hard drives!
|
07-12-07 03:46am
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think normally if I came into some unexpected money, it wouldn't be spent on porn. However, if I was lucky enough to get any from Porn Users, then I think I would actually spend it all on joining a variety of new porn sites, perhaps ones that, whilst still appealing to me have none or not many reviews on PU -- so I would be able to contribute a review or two to the site.
|
07-11-07 03:42pm
|
Comment
140
|
Beautiful Agony
(0)
|
|
07-11-07 03:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
141
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
iporn's Comment
Yeah, I'm interested in some more informatino about this too. Videobox is a site I'm subsribed to more often than not.
The website is already excellent, but it'd be awesome to know what improvements they have planned.
Is it possible, if you're a member to elect to use the new beta site?
|
07-11-07 03:27pm
|
Comment
142
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
07-11-07 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
143
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
Great review SnowDude.
I completely agree with everything you've said -- especially with regards to them advertising the videos as high quality, when the older ones are downright poor, and the new videos are probably still below average.
I think from the incredible income that Bangbros generate, they should get some better camcorders.
Would love nothing more than Tugjobs in HD 1080i, and the same goes for the rest of the network.
|
07-11-07 07:17am
|
Review
144
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Excellent price (especially with TBP Bonus!).
-Lots and lots of content available.
-Frequent updates.
-Nice mixture of content, including boy/girl scenes.
-No DRM.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Download managers supported.
-Good support. |
| Cons: |
-Some leased content.
-Bonus Viv Thomas section not great.
-Doesn't take long to see flesh in the photo sets. This seems to lessen the erotic-ness.
-Not the greatest download speeds.
-Model names inconsistent. They seem to be different on Teendreams than other sites that feature the same models - makes it hard to grab all one models content.
-Some of the photosets are poor quality.
-Updates seem to favour photosets rather than video.
-Live Cams section of the website doesn't work. |
| Bottom Line: |
All things considered, Teen Dreams is overall, one of the better Teen sites on the net.
The majority of the models are indeed teens, as opposed to the frequent 21yo models seen on other teen sites.
The variety of content is appealing and with unlimited downloads and no DRM, people who enjoy collecting large amounts of teen porn should fare well here.
One should note however, that the download speeds aren't that great. That was an issue for me, because I'm impatient. I'd like everything to download at 2.4MB/s, I'd be lucky to achieve 150KB/s at Teen Dreams.
I also got frustrated because models I recognised from other sites used different names here. This messed up my collection a bit.
Even though there's a few negatives, I still recommend Teen Dreams if nothing in the Cons list really grabs your attention.
It's also good to know that if you do join and have a problem, they have excellent support who will reply to your emails usually within the hour from my experience.
Recommended Teen Site! |
|
07-11-07 06:59am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
145
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
07-11-07 02:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
146
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Traveler's Comment
I completely agree about how much DRM sucks.
The good news is, that 99BB have now stopped using DRM. I'm unsure if they've removed DRM from previous titled that had it, but all new videos are DRM-free.
There was a news bulletin on the site about a month ago saying how they'd stopped using DRM, but I can no longer find it, it's unfortunately not the easiest site to navigate!
But yeah, DRM seems to be a thing of the past for 99BB.
|
07-11-07 02:42am
|
Review
147
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive content.
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.
-Mostly pretty models.
-No DRM.
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality could be improved.
-Would like to see more updates.
-Content doesn't justify the cost.
-Site design is somewhat scattered.
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
18 Eighteen looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.
There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.
If you like the youngest porn possible, 18 Eighteen's content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.
Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately. |
|
07-11-07 02:08am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
The face and eyes of the girl would be the first thing I notice, followed closely by tits and general curves!
|
07-11-07 12:40am
|
Review
149
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-High quality videos.
-High quality pictures.
-Reasonable price.
-Many beautiful girls.
-No DRM.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Supports download managers.
-Reliable updates. |
| Cons: |
-Members section of website doesn't look as nice as homepage.
-Not much talking in any of the videos, only the occasional moan.
-Many models not English-speaking, appear to be mostely Eastern-Europe.
-Some of the content (pictures mainly) are leased.
-Scenes can become repetitive.
-Virtually all models have small breasts.
-Site could be improved to allow users to download all of a certain models content quickly. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sapphic Erotica is a fairly decent Lesbian site. It's not without it's problems though..
I joined about 4 months ago, and didn't renew my membership next month. Whilst the content is fairly hardcore and high quality the complete lack of speech in the videos doesn't go down well, nor do the fact that recently the amont of new models seems to have been reduced. Updates often contain the same models, albeit with different partners.
That being said, if the lack of large breasts and speaking aren't major issues for you - and you have patience to navigate the so-so website, then Sapphic Erotica would be recommended due to the large amount of content and extremely high quality videos, and ofcourse the fact that DRM is not used.
There are a few *stunning* models on there also, such as Zafira and Collete. Be sure to check them out if you join. |
|
07-11-07 12:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
150
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey,
I use GetRight 6.3 (http://www.getright.com).
Unfortunately it's not free, but does have a 30-day trial so you could give it a go. I think the problem you're referring to is something that has happened to me on occasion. If I've queued up a list of downloads in GetRight, sometimes a random few will fail. Simply pausing and resuming them under GetRight solves the problem and they download fine - it happens rarely though.
Give GetRight a trial, failing that you could try FlashGet (also free) - http://www.flashget.com/index_en.htm
Hope that helps :)
|
07-11-07 12:02am
|
