| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I tend to ignore the feed content. It's not what I've joined the site to see, and for the most part it's of questionable quality.
Sure, if I filtered through it all I'm sure I'd find some nice stuff, but there's enough of that in the main content of the site I'd joined anyway.
|
07-12-07 03:47pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Most definately Videobox.
In the past 2 years, which is around about how long I've joined pay-for porn, it's the single best site I've ever joined all things considered by a fairly large margin.
Have also joined Abby Winters, which would come a close second.
Either way, both are superb.
|
07-12-07 03:45pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Perhaps around 100-150.
I find it irritating when I download a photoset, and many of the pictures are the same, just focuses very slightly differently.
For me, that's a waste of hard drive space.
Quality > Content.
|
07-12-07 03:44pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
The main source for locating porn sites would definately be TBP.
After hearing good reviews about Videobox from elsewhere and checking out the site, they had a snippet of their TBP review on the front page.. which I checked out.
Glad I did because TBP is truely great. And it's thanks to TBP that I found out about PU!
|
07-12-07 03:43pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think it's a great turn-on when it's genuine.
The messier the better!
|
07-12-07 03:41pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Fingering/licking gets my vote.
It's penetration in it's own right.
|
07-12-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I usually spend only around $20-30 per month.
It's difficult to say though because sometimes I join a site for a year, which usually means big savings over the monthly rate.
|
07-12-07 03:39pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Yeah it's pretty nice if the girl is attractive and lots of soap is used heh, but there are better things.
Perhaps the most important part in shower scenes is the breasts.
|
07-12-07 04:05am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I agree entirely!
|
07-12-07 04:03am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I think anonymous trust ratings are okay if it's a Yes.. but if someone's going to say that they don't trust a user, then they need to provide some sort of reason as to why.
Perhaps it would be better if anonymous trust ratings weren't allowed.
And as people have said, you're going to get people who give you a "No" vote out of spite.
|
07-12-07 04:01am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think so, just like many computer software has a trial.
Potential customers would like to see inside the members area, and exactly what they could get with a full-blown membership. I feel that site's that don't offer any kind of trial membership perhaps have something to hide. Maybe their content isn't as advertised on the signup page?
Although there are a few sneaky sites, that if one subscribes to the trial that lasts 3 days for example, after that if the rebills haven't been cancelled, it not only converts to a full-blown membership, but it's a premium price membership, more expensive that it would normally be.
One of the networks that come to mind for doing this is Bangbros.
So in a nutshell, trials are great and should be offered by sites.. but they shouldn't rebill. You pay say $5 for a 3 day trial, and after 3 days that's it.
|
07-12-07 03:59am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
For me, the review length/quality pays a big part.
If the reviewer has just written a barely approved review to get a point, what's to say it's going to be accurate?
I'd also compare the review against my own experience If I'd been a member of the site, which would have a big effect on whether or not I'd trust the user.
|
07-12-07 03:55am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
Whilst I don't tend to look at pictures that much, I'm more into videos, I think that photo-shopping/correction shouldn't be used really.
I like to know that what I'm looking at is real, and the picture is true to form.
Even if the complexion is bad, leave the pictures alone!
|
07-12-07 03:53am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hmm..
Fisting is alright as long as it's girl-girl.
Although it's not something I'm particularly Interested in, but I don't object to it either.
|
07-12-07 03:48am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most definately.
My computer hardware budget money tends to be spent mainly on external hard drives!
|
07-12-07 03:46am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think normally if I came into some unexpected money, it wouldn't be spent on porn. However, if I was lucky enough to get any from Porn Users, then I think I would actually spend it all on joining a variety of new porn sites, perhaps ones that, whilst still appealing to me have none or not many reviews on PU -- so I would be able to contribute a review or two to the site.
|
07-11-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
The face and eyes of the girl would be the first thing I notice, followed closely by tits and general curves!
|
07-11-07 12:40am
|
Review
118
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive content.
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.
-Mostly pretty models.
-No DRM.
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality could be improved.
-Would like to see more updates.
-Content doesn't justify the cost.
-Site design is somewhat scattered.
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
18 Eighteen looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.
There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.
If you like the youngest porn possible, 18 Eighteen's content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.
Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately. |
|
07-11-07 02:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
abbywinters
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Excellent website / navigation.
-Community forum where admins / models participate.
-No fake orgasms.
-Huge amount of content.
-Real amateurs.
-No DRM.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Supports download managers.
-Daily updates.
-Good value (especially with TBP bonus!) |
| Cons: |
-Have to pay more for girl-girl content.
-Many models of poor complexion.
-Browsing website can be slow (although downloads are fast). |
| Bottom Line: |
First off, I'd like to say that all things considered this is one of my favourite sites.
Many sites on the net feel fake, the models are acting for the camera and orgasms are not genuine. You will not find this here. In the girl-girl shoots, models are really into each other and seem to completely forget about the camera which is awesome. Orgasms are 100% authentic also.
The website is excellent, one is only able to imagine the sheer amount of thought and work that went into putting it together. The inclusion of a forum is a good, especially as the admins and models are active there.
It's worth saying that many models here do have large bushes, but this I feel adds to the site as it's in the amateur niche. It's worth noting though as this is a turn-off for some.
Also, atleast for me, I found only a small percentage of the models here attractive, nothing to do with pubic hair, but general complexion.
But all in all, it's a great site that has a very genuine, high-quality feel about it.
I would recommend joining if you like amateur content, because Abby Winters is the top of the niche, and updates are frequently and the update plan is clear.
Just be aware that the "Gold" membership, which I recommend over the normal for the Girl-Girl content does cost more than the standard membership, but it's still very good value.
If you like real Amateur Austrailian girls - and don't mind lots of pubes then join this site - you won't regret it! |
|
07-22-07 03:49am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
120
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Thrillhouse85's Review
Nice review of a very nice site!
I joined AW a while ago, and it's one of my favourite sites. I always had extremely fast downloads (1.2MB/s), but frequently found that browsing the site was incredibly slow.
I think at the time however, there was some talk of a DDOS attack that was directed towards AW on the forums, so that may have been the explanation, I'm not sure how it is now.
|
07-21-07 03:52pm
|
Reply
121
|
Angelitas.net
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Let me be the first to congratulate you on writing a very nice review!
Angelitas is a site I hadn't come across, but your review has prompted me to add the site to my Favorites. Perhaps my next membership will be here!
|
07-27-07 04:00pm
|
Reply
122
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
jastrength's Comment
I think the other guys in the bus can be funny at times, but I definately think that Bangbus would be a lot better if they weren't there.
Either have just the driver in the bus who's also in the porn, or have a different driver that's not really in the video after the girl get's in the bus.
It's quite a big turn off then they're laughing and talking in the background.
|
07-21-07 03:55pm
|
Comment
123
|
Beautiful Agony
(0)
|
|
07-11-07 03:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
Big Mouthfuls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive models.
-Decent amount of content.
-Easy to use website.
-No DRM.
-No download limit (although mentioned in their terms, I verified this by contacting them).
-Works with download managers.
-Still updates. |
| Cons: |
-Poor video quality on older videos, only average (1000kbps) on new videos.
-Some repetition.
-More frequent updates desireable.
-Poor value compared to accessing site through OxPass or BangBrosNetwork. |
| Bottom Line: |
All points taken into consideration, I still like this website. The attractive models and regular updates just about allow me to allow a rebill, albeit for the OxPass network however.
I wouldn't pay $23.95 per month for this site alone, therefore if you like Big Mouthfuls, look into either OxPass or BangBrosNetwork and you'll get access to a whole host of other Bangbros sites that cover different niches as well as Big Mouthfuls.
There are unfortunately some criticisms to be made though.
Video quality is in my view unacceptable. Sure, all sites' older videos are poor quality, but this sites (and the rest of Bangbros' sites) newer videos are nothing special. Running at only 1000k (640x480 resolution). For me, this is not good enough, it wouldn't cost them too much to get some newer camcorders, especially when you think about how much profit these guys make.
Having said that, their downloads have no DRM so are yours to keep forever.
I would have rated this site a 90 if it wasn't for the poor videos and having only weekly updates (rather than daily).
Finally, a word of caution. Be very wary if you sign up to the trial membership. You'll regret it if you don't cancel it in time as they'll rebill you at a premium monthly rate price!
I would recommend this site based on the content, but only when joining through one of the network sites such as OxPass. |
|
07-24-07 12:35am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
125
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
|
07-27-07 09:39am
Replies (2)
|
