| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I may rephrase this poll in the future, because I didn't mean DRM in the traditional sense, I just meant a hidden watermark to identify each downloader.
|
02-01-15 06:31am
|
Reply
252
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Review
"I also believe many of the "PornstarPunishment" videos that I understand had been removed at one time have been put back into the archive however they appear to have received some edits."
Can you give an example of one of these? I am a member at Brazzers right now, so I would be curious to check this out.
|
01-31-15 07:45pm
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
If you do this right, they can't be removed. You place a watermark that is unique to each user, and it consists of very subtle color alterations of the pixels comprising the watermark, which can be off to the corner somewhere. You would never be able to see the effect of this.
If the webmaster wants to identify the downloader of a given image, all they have to do is subtract the pixels of their un-watermarked master copy from the watermarked image.
This cannot be decoded or removed without the master file, so there would be no way to defeat it.
Again, I would be fine with this. I once saw it implemented really badly though, with a semi-translucent alphanumeric code watermark right in the middle of the field of view. Ugh!
|
01-31-15 02:19pm
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Just to clarify, I don't mean DRM in the sense that you can't copy or view it without any restrictions. I just mean they added an invisible watermark or some other means of identifying each downloader on a master list.
I have joined a few sites that did this, and it doesn't bother me. You've got nothing to worry about as long as you don't pirate the content. As long as you are not pirating the content, then the only way anyone could use the codes to identify you is if they found the porn on your hard drive, but in that case I think they would know its yours anyways.
I'm surprised more sites haven't done this. I've seen sites close, with the owners complaining about the usual, no money in porn, piracy, etc, yet they never tried anything like this.
|
01-31-15 10:05am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.
|
01-27-15 08:20pm
|
Comment
256
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
|
01-27-15 06:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
None of the above, although girls getting cosmetic surgery when they don't really need it is kind of a shame.
|
01-27-15 02:09pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.
|
01-26-15 07:01pm
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.
|
01-25-15 06:06pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.
Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:
PornstarPunishment.com
This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.
SickPuppy.com
They constantly posted about all the pressure from credit card processors, now almost all of their content is removed.
WatersportsSluts.com (Hard Glam Network)
Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.
Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.
YellowDiscipline.com
It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.
There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.
Veronica-Moser.com
This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.
|
01-25-15 11:43am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have hundreds of sites in mind I would like to join, so for me it's just a matter of what's next. I rarely see a site for the first time and join as an impulse buy.
|
01-25-15 09:43am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.
My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.
|
01-24-15 07:37am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.
It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.
|
01-23-15 08:49pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I definitely do, as long as it is something I would have downloaded in the first place. That's why I say get it while the getting's good. You never know what will be there tomnorrow.
|
01-23-15 02:09pm
|
Comment
265
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
|
01-21-15 05:49pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I use Bulk Image Downloader for photo sets that aren't in zips. I haven't tried IDM yet. Does it let you queue up all the downloads you want, then basically just walk away while it does the work?
|
01-15-15 06:31pm
|
Reply
267
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergodex's Comment
Actually, there are more videos missing than this. Check your email, I PM'd you.
|
01-11-15 02:01pm
|
Comment
268
|
TAC Amateurs
(0)
|
|
01-11-15 11:10am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
269
|
Nylonic
(0)
|
|
01-11-15 08:25am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
270
|
Pain Sex.tv
(0)
|
|
01-11-15 08:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
271
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
Are her solo peeing scenes gone? If that's the case, I don't think I'll join.
|
01-11-15 07:25am
|
Reply
272
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergodex's Comment
The videos missing were a 3 part series titled in order:
Rubber clinic masturbation and pussy licking
Naughty rubber cleaning girls
Vaginal rubber treatment
There was nothing out of the ordinary in them for content, and the models Tanja and Lena feature regularly in their other videos. I can only speculate, but there doesn't seem to have been a reason for them to remove these particular videos. They did renovate their site, and sometimes content gets lost accidentally in those situations.
|
01-11-15 07:17am
|
Reply
273
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I'll check it out the next time I'm at Twistys. Someone once told me their older peeing shoots were amazing, so my curiosity is piqued. Also, I think all of Twistys' peeing shoots were pre-2007, including Justine Joli and Amber Michaels.
|
01-10-15 06:08pm
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
"So tell me, is there something you know that I don't?"
Nope. The two sites I downloaded in their final state right before closing happened purely by chance. I wish there were a way of knowing, like if sites had going out of business sales, but it's usually impossible to predict.
|
01-10-15 07:22am
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Despite the wide range of responses to the poll, it seems all us commenters are in agreement.
|
01-09-15 04:18pm
|
