While I always appreciate a win, I don't usually notice for a while. While the raffle makes things more interesting, it is far from a big motive to hang out and post here.
I agree with you on the quality of TBP and PU. I haven't really looked at another review site since I found this in 2007. I trust the TBP reviews and the gang at PU is always helpful in filling in some details and given a good subjective assessment of a site.
Pat – thanks for the great review. I’m always amazed at how you find some of this stuff!
I’ve recently made it a point to check any reported errors at TBP before signing up to a site. I’ve reported errors that don’t then get fixed in the main review. I can understand why that is – the reviewer has a set of facts and reports on that but things may change. And it wouldn’t make any sense for TBP staff to just change a review based on a comment from a reader, even if the reader making the comment is well known as you are on the site. I once reported an error on a daily download limit that did get changed in the review, but recently I noted an error in Wave Hos where the TBP review says it is a full trial and it isn’t. There is extremely limited access to the site via the trial. The problem for TBP though is that may be difficult to confirm.
TBP is an amazing resource but they can’t be perfect all the time, so I make it a point to check TBP and PU before joining a site – and that now includes looking at any reported errors.
I felt the same way when I stumbled on this site a few years back. One thing that amazed me then and continues to amaze me is the level of civility that exists here. On so many other forums on just about any topic it seems that any thread quickly devolves to a shouting match. That never occurs here. My tastes in porn are a bit extreme for the members who are more into softcore stuff, but I never feel judged. Welcome to the site!
And if you're into public humiliation stuff i can't recommend Public Disgrace highly enough. It has the production values that Kink seems to always have. The only complaint is that it can get a bit repetitive if you watch a lot of it back-to-back. One tip with Kink, if you haven't already, is to sign up for email offers. The regularly offer discounts that way.
I’m a huge fan of Kink’s stuff but I’m not into gay material so I’ve often wondered if their gay stuff was up to the same standards of their straight stuff. You’ve cleared that up for me. This sounds like it is exactly like Public Disgrace, which is huge favorite of mine. There are two distinct themes on Public Disgrace – scenes that are in ‘public’ in that they are shot in front of a group of people in the SF Armory or in a bar or some other public setting, and then there are scenes that are really public in that they are shot in open, public areas in European cities with full public nudity. The sex usually occurs outside but in a more discrete area. I’m assuming that given our culture’s generally homophobic nature that Bound in Public doesn’t have any of those truly ‘public’ shoots.
While I wouldn’t consider myself a candidate for gay porn, I’m glad to see that there are some reviews being posted. Welcome to the site and I think you’ll find that everyone here is pretty welcoming.
I guess it depends on how ‘outrageous’ is defined. If the person setting the terms is into softcore solo girl material then I’m guilty as charged. But I also suspect that a lot of what I buy and download would be considered outrageous by the majority here too. I like a lot of BDSM stuff as long as it is clear that the woman is fully consenting. That’s one of the reasons I think that Kink.com is just about the best porn company on the net. I own a lot of stuff from Jim Powers and JM Productions, as well a lot of Max Hardcore stuff. I even had a membership to Facial Abuse which was a bit too extreme for me.
But… if ‘outrageous’ means looking for something that is illegal or even in a grey area, legally speaking, then I don’t seek that out. I may be sick and twisted to some, but even I have limits.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- TBP Discount ($17.95)
- 291 Scenes (approx 30 mins each)
- Appears to be all or mostly exclusive content on this site
- Videos available in multiple ways
- Pictures and screenshots available
- Bills through CCBill
- Good mix of well known and lesser known models
- Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager and it works fine)
- Part of a network (8 sites in total)
Cons:
- Definition of HD is pretty flexible
- Download speeds below average
- Updates aren’t dated
- Hello??? Have the directors never heard of anal sex?
Bottom Line:
Innocent High is a site within a network that features young, though fully legal, models in various school-oriented scenes. All the standard clichés are here, the most common being teacher and student, or principal and student. I could complain that these are repetitive and overused, but I couldn’t come up with anything better. Regardless of the setup, the goal is the same in all the scenes: show off the youthful model in a well-lit, well-shot scene with good camera work and editing. If all porn sites did those basics this well the porn world would be a better place.
As for the models, there is a great mix of well known models like Aubrey Addams (looking mind-numbingly beautiful in her pre-surgery days), Ashli Orion and Eden Adams. There are plenty of less recognizable models too, though they are all young and very good looking. Most are petite and small-breasted, though there are lots who are better endowed too.
There are 291 scenes now on the site with 171 of these advertised as being HD. The problem with that claim is that the site’s definition of HD has varied a bit over time. Some are 1280x720 at 4500kbps while others are 960x540 at 1800kbps. They all look good on a monitor though I haven’t tried them on a TV yet. The site offers more options to view the videos than I’ve seen elsewhere, so there will be something for all tastes and connections. Streaming is available in various resolutions, though I can’t say anything more than it looks good. Downloads are available in different ways and resolutions. Your download options are to download the full video, download a ‘best of’ clip, download it in 3 segments or in 1-minute segments, or the trailer. Nobody can complain that they can’t get the scene how they want it. For downloads, the ‘full’ offers the most choices with WMV (in up to three resolutions), Quicktime, Mpg and IPod. “HD” is as listed above and the next lower resolutions come in at 640x480 or 640x360. I assume this depends on when the scene was shot and added. I can’t give a clear picture on when the uploads were because they aren’t dated. Also for that reason I can’t give an indication of the update schedule, though it certainly looks like it is updating.
Pictures are also available, as are screenshots. The pics are available as zips and come in at 1050x700. They look good, but obviously not hi-res.
There are no big negatives to this site. If I had to pick on one I’d point out that the download speeds are lower than I’ve seen at other big sites. Using Free Download Manager I get 1100KB/s, which is 700+ lower than with most sites. Also, TBP has a warning about download managers. They don’t specify what the issue is, but I had no problems.
This site has the quality and quantity to make the TBP discounted price an excellent value – even without being part of a network. Couple it with the 7 other sites in the Team Skeet network and it becomes even better.
I've been hoping for a new review of this site. It isn't really what I'm into, but I was intrigued. I think that based on your review I'll avoid them for now and if I want a 'glamour' site I'll go to ALS Scan or Nubiles.
Welcome to Pornusers. I think you'll find that this site (and The Best Porn) is a great resource to help you get the most value from your porn budget.
Thankfully I don't have many problems, but those few I've had my preferred means to get them solved is email. Recently on a VOD site that I trusted I used a pop-up chat window and that worked well too.
Thanks for the review. I wasn't aware that this site existed but I had been a big fan of her older stuff. But now knowing that there isn't a lot of her pre-implant work available here I'll probably just stay clear. You saved me some money, which is certainly one of the goals of Pornusers!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- 472 scenes
- 215 HD scenes (exclusive)
- 257 SD (non-exclusive)
- Photos and screenshots available
- Pics in zips
- Screenshots not available in hi-res or as zips
- SD scenes have photos only in 683x1024
- Supports download managers
- $4.95 2-day trial
- Bills through DHD
Cons:
- Limited (and inaccurate) navigation
- Many non-exclusive, non-HD scenes
Bottom Line:
This is my second review of this site, the first being about a year ago. The site continues to grow, having added approximately one scene per week for the last year now giving them a total of 472 scenes. That number is a bit misleading since they continue to add some SD video as well. The good news is that in the past year the number of HD scenes has grown a lot faster than the number of SD scenes. If there is a serious drawback, it isn’t the resolution but the fact that the SD scenes (and some of the HD scenes) aren’t exclusive so if you already have a large collection you’re bound to see some repeats.
Navigation is simple, but on a site this size there isn’t any real need for complex navigation. You can sort the exclusive/mostly HD stuff from the non-exclusive SD scenes. The search function is limited too, which may not be bad in a site this size, but it is also inaccurate. I used the ‘category’ function to sort for anal scenes and discovered that a number of them weren’t sorted in to the category search.
Video quality is very good on the HD scenes. The HD scenes are 1280x720 while the SD scenes are in either 720x480 or 640x480 depending on when they were added, the older ones being the lower resolution. This site made me an HD convert last time and there’s been no turning back.
I don’t normally collect photos but I did download a lot from this site. There are photos and screenshots available for most scenes. The photos are available in ‘hi-res’ (683x1024) and ‘ultra-high-res’ (1366x2048) for the HD scenes and just the ‘hi-res’ for the SD scenes. Only the photos (not the screenshots) are available as a zip, and a quirk is that when you download the zip the folder of photos is buried about 10 folders deep. And once you click through all the folders you’ll see that you have both resolutions of photos with only a minor name difference, so you’ll need to do a bit of editing.
The last time I had a membership here I complained that the download speed was slow. I don’t remember what I was getting then, but using Free Download Manager now and a 15MB/s fiberop connection the speeds are much better. I get 2MB/s, but I may have that capped in FDM.
One advantage to this site is that they do offer a 2-day full trial for $4.95 and they do offer the ability to see what they have to offer without a membership, so you can browse the site and may decide that you can get everything you want for the trial membership. And with the biller being DHD you can have confidence that you’ll be able to cancel your membership easily. That makes the site an exceptional value. If you’re new to the site, it might be better to go for the full membership as it does have a lot more to offer than you can get in 2 days.
HD Porn continues to grow and offer some great exclusive HD scenes for a fair monthly price. I’d recommend it for anyone looking for HD video.
My only experience with a massage site is with Massage Creep. I had low expectations because I find these single set-up sites can get boring. But I was pleasantly surprised to find that even though the scenes all follow the same structure they still manage to be hot. I'm sure a lot of the credit goes to the person hiring the girls.
As for Jurassic Cock, this was the reason I joined the network. I don't have an old-guy-young-girl thing, but TBP made it seem interesting so I joined and was really happy with it. I tend to search out a lot of older porn (80s and 90s) and don't get a lot of exposure to new models so this site introduced me to a few that I'll continue to watch for.
I had the same thing with the reported scene lengths in Public Violations. Most of the scenes are really short anyway, and the many of the ones that have the wrong times listed seem to be over, so I think it is just a typo.
And finally, I will always question their decision to use so much of the fake-cock-fake-cum stuff. It makes no sense to me.
I've just wrapped up a membership and agree with everything you wrote. Several of the sites are excellent and worth the subscription alone. I really liked Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep is very well done. I found myself watching the scene setup that I'd normally skip.
And the fake cock/cumshot sites... I can't imagine that these are a big draw but they must be since there are several sites that use them almost exclusively. I can see watching one or two for the bizarreness of them, but they get old fast.
And Public Violations is an interesting site too. It's obviously staged, but still fun to watch.
For me the issue isn't what kind of editing, as long as it is well done and doesn't ruin the continuity or mood of a scene. One of the things that really bugs me about some scenes is having a guy and girl start to fool around a bit and then edit to her naked and giving him head. What happened to her clothes? Seeing a woman get undressed or be undressed is a favorite thing of mine.
Back in 2006 Smash Pictures did a video called "Moving Violations" where they didn't do any editing. The camera and sound was turned on and the talent did their thing. Nothing got cut. It was interesting to watch, and I would have like to see a small series developed from it, but it did underscore the need for some editing.
And as for the fake moans and groans overdubbed on the scene - those have to go.
Interesting viewpoint. I don't share it, but I can understand where you're coming from. Personally, the scene set-up is at least as important for me as the actual sex. In many scenes I find myself watching the set-up more than the sex. I'll watch the set-up (on a good scene with a good set-up) and then skip ahead to the pop shot. But like I said, I do understand your point and there are probably more guys who are on your side than on mine.
I do disagree with you on one thing though, and that's blaiming Videobox for your dislike of "BS fillers." Videobox posts porn DVDs and they post what the studios shoot so if you don't like the filler stuff then the studios are at fault. You're certainly entitled to your opinion, and you won't get flamed for it here, though you may get respectfully questioned about it, but I think the almost-universal opinion on this site is that Videobox is a great site.
Welcome to the board and I hope you stick around and contribute more in the future.
Thanks for the review. i found it interesting and informative. I'm a big fan of Private stuff and often wondered about joining. But based on your experience I won't bother.
Two comments:
1) Private seems to have at least two levels of material. Let's say A list and B list. I find that almost none of the A list stuff makes it to Videobox, though some of it does.
2) This seems to be another example of a studio site that begrudginly puts material on the internet. I really don't understand this. The internet isn't the future anymore, it's the present. People want material on the internet now. Having crappy websites with slow downloads won't help any company.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 140 +/- scenes
- Usually some extreme ass play
- Some anal fisting
- Some enemas
- Very innovative
- Videos available in several formats and resolutions
- Pictures available
- Regular updates
- Good mix of solo, girl on girl(s) and girl(s) and guy(s)
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Seems to have lost some of its edge
- Not many ‘fresh’ models
Bottom Line:
While there are countless sites dedicated to anal sex, there aren’t many dedicated to a wider appreciation of all things related to the female ass. This site is one of those rare ones, and without having seen many others I’d be surprised if this wasn’t the best of them. This site obviously isn’t for everyone, but the same can be said for most of the sites under the Kink umbrella.
I last reviewed this site when it was fairly new and it has continued to grow. There are now approximately 140 scenes on the site, most of which are about an hour long. So even at full price, this is a great value. Even the oldest of the scenes (which only date back to 2009) are available in ways to suit all preferences. There is streaming (which I don’t use and can’t really speak to, though it looks good) and there are downloads. Downloads are available in mp4 HD, wmv HD, wmv SD and mp4 for portable devices. My experience is only with wmv HD which, while excellent quality, isn’t as crisp as some other sites that offer HD. The resolution is 1280x720 with a bitrate of about 7500kbps. Photos are also available (1200x800) individually or as zips. Frequently the zips are broken down into themes so if you want all the photos there may be a couple of zips to get.
The scenes mostly have a common theme: extreme ass play. There is some variety in that there are solo scenes, all girl with two or more models, and some scenes with a mix of women and men. The latter aren’t as common as the others. The scenes involve anal penetrations of toys and other large items. Fisting does occur, but it (sadly) isn’t as common as one might hope for on such a site. Many of the earlier scenes involve a lot of enema play, but that seems to have mostly disappeared from the newer scenes. Since fisting and enemas aren’t common, that was always a big selling point for me, so I’m disappointed to see it dialed back.
Another change I’ve noticed is that it isn’t as edgy as it once was. This is highly subjective, but it seems to me that a lot of the newer scenes are more mainstream, if you can call any of this ‘mainstream.’ The older scenes are amazing to watch, with a lot of enema action. Many of the newer scenes are styled more like an anal scene you’d expect from Evil Angel, for example. All the technical bits are the same, but the newer scenes just seem more tame. Many of the scenes have a BDSM undertone, and this could be a factor for a prospective subscriber.
There isn’t a huge variety in models, which is a bit of a negative for me, but then again there probably aren’t that many models willing to do scenes like this. The fetish models you might expect to see are here: Dana DeArmond, Amy Brooke, Bobbi Starr and Amber Rayne all make multiple appearances, and they always give 110%. But it would be nice to see some fresh faces more often.
This fetish isn’t for everyone, but if you have an ass play interest this site will certainly satisfy you.
I answered “yes, definitely, but for me, the better question would be “how often do you come across porn that causes a new fetish?”
I can still remember (though the details are lost in the mists of time) when I discovered small breasts. Every guy, it seemed, was into big breasts, then one day seeing a petite lass with small breasts in a porn flick changed that whole outlook for me.
More recently, starting a few years ago, one of my stranger fetishes popped up. That would be seeing women have some liquid poured on them. It probably started with Alex Sanders’ series Tappin’ that Ass where he begins each scene by pouring honey on the models as foreplay to the actual scene. Naturally then, the Elegant Angel series Big Wet Asses is a favorite too – with baby oil being used in liberal quantities.
Developing out of that I watched some of Jay Sin’s work with Evil Angel, particularly his Milk Nymphos series, where a lot of milk is used. This series led me to develop some new anal-themed fetishes too, of which I have no shortage (weird insertions, gaping, milk enemas, fisting, etc.). I’d have to say that Jay Sin is probably my favorite director working today. I just wish he had more material.
" THE SITES WITH THE BIGGER NAME GIRLS LIKE ASHLEY SAGE HAVE INCORRECT LINKS TO THE ZIP FILES WHICH BRING SOME FILES OF VERY SMALL BREASTED GIRLS INSTEAD OF THE MONSTER TITS YOU ARE EXPECTING."
You know, there are some of us here who would consider that a good thing!
Seriously though, this is the first time I've ever heard of a site even denying that it has download quotas. Download caps really piss me off anyway, but to have one hidden and then declared a technical difficulty would probably make my head explode.
Thanks for the great review and welcome to the site!
What's available on the site is the most important to me, followed by how easy it is to get at that material. I really don't care about site design as long as it doesn't get in the way.
I've reported this to the staff at TBP too, but just in case you only read here before joining be aware that the trial membership does not give full access to the site. The trial membership gives access to six photo sets. I reported at TBP that it also gave some video access but that turned out to be wrong. None of the video links actually work. Clicking any other link on the site merely invites you to pay for an upgrade. And the same concern that lk2fireone reported below applies here: the "upgrade" is $39.95. So you can join for $29.95 OR you can take the limited trial for $4.95 and then "upgrade" for $39.95. Some deal! But when you cancel your membership you're offered a deal of $9.95. So if you really want something on this site, take the trial and then cancel to get the low price. I didn't take the offer because I was pissed off at them.
"When I was a member last (late last year) it appeared to be updating still, though I can't remember how frequently."
If you've never been a member before at all I think that you'll find that it is worth the membership fee just for what is there though.
You certainly point out a serious flaw in the site though: the fact that there is very limited information available to a prospective member. This really bugs me about some sites, especially when you compare them to sites that give full acess to see what is there and the only difference with a membership is that you can actually download. Sites like Public Flash always make me nervous - of they won't give me a good idea of what they have, then what are they hiding?
But with Public Flash you can take a membership with some level of confidence based on the reviews here and TBP.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
