| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
We Fuck Black Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Trusted billers
-Access to all 22 sites in the network
-A lot of variation in the storylines and styles |
| Cons: |
-Infrequent updates
-Have an option to list more than 5 scenes on one page. Since there are so many scenes, you have to click through 100s of pages (But this is nitpicking of course, I won't deduct any points for it ;-) ) |
| Bottom Line: |
WFBG is the second site from the DogFart network that I spent a significant amount of time with (will probably do the same with most of the sites in the network to get the most out of my membership) and the concept is basically opposite of BlacksOnBlondes, the previous site I reviewed.
The downside to this site is that it doesn't get updated as frequently as BOB, and therefor it also has a smaller b(l)ack catalog. However when it comes to the content, I like it a bit better (and just because I have a thing for black/African women in porn).
I felt like the acting was overall a bit better and there was a bigger variation in the personalities of the model. The scenes range from soft to hardcore and from couple to gang bang. They also get creative with the story lines, rarely repeating the same setup.
Some examples:
-Birthday gangbang
-Scene starts out lesbian, guy walks in
-Girl gets her measurements taken bij a (seemingly gay) tailor, it escalates when measuring her boobs and butt
-2 guys get in some sort of “reverse casting couch” situation where the girl tricks them into fucking her
-Girl is in the hospital frustrated with her negative pregnancy test, the white doctors gang bang and creampie her so that she can tell her husband there's a baby on the way.
While the quality of the videos is the same level, I feel like they put more effort in the directing for this site (maybe because they take more time between updates?) leading to content that personally I like more than BlacksOnBlondes. Both when it comes to the intros and the sex itself.
However, I'm still giving it a lower score because of the infrequent update schedule. |
|
08-06-19 05:47am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
The results are pretty clear haha. Though I think it's a weird comparison, they are very different types of actresses from different eras of porn.
|
08-06-19 05:28am
|
Reply
78
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
They are good points but that doesn't make it smart business. Reward loyal customers creates the possibility to generate free word of mouth that could bring in new customers.
Focusing on rewarding new customers and penalizing long term users could lead to requiring more and more effort to find new people to target (since ex-members weren't satisfied with their treatment).
It's funny how the term "power user" sounds like something positive actually, not something that should be discouraged .
|
07-26-19 03:48am
|
Reply
79
|
T&A Ebony
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
This site looks epic! Totally to my tastes. Another one I can add to the list of sites discovered through PU haha.
|
07-26-19 03:39am
|
Review
80
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Huge backlog of scenes
-Still updating weekly
-Trusted billers
-Access to all 22 sites in the network (though they may not all fit your tastes) |
| Cons: |
No real "bad" cons. So instead I'll share some constructive ideas:
-Have an option to list more than 5 scenes on one page. Since there are so many scenes, you have to click through 100s of pages.
-Add more thumbnails to every scene. These often help me decide whether a scene will turn me on or not. Currently there's only one, so I often have to skim through a scene to decide if I'll enjoy watching it.
Like I said, no real cons, just nitpicking since I need to write something :-) |
| Bottom Line: |
Dogfart is arguably the most famous interracial network on the web. I usually avoid the big networks because I don't like the acting. But as the #1 recommended site on PU I had to give it a chance.
I wasn't disappointed. There's still some scenes that are a bit too "staged" for me (this is mostly when the women are overacting). But in general they are awesome.
I was pleasantly surprised by the variety in models. They are not just "blonde". They have all hair colors and ethnicities, with lots of different personalities too. The only thing missing so far for me were some Latinas. But then again, I didn't watch every scene yet.
The scenes also vary in scenario (which is definitely a must for a site with this many scenes) and in the amount of people having sex in it. In general I had the feeling that the scenes with 3 or more people are usually way better than the scenes where it's just B+G. Not sure if this is actually a differents in quality or my preference though haha.
It feels kindof weird writing a review where I have nothing negative or critical to say. But in general I'd recommend everyone into porn with black men or women to give this site ago.
Will definitely check out and review the other sites in the network as well. |
|
07-15-19 09:09am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
81
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
That's great news. The suit just looked plain weird.
|
07-05-19 04:12am
|
Reply
82
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
"
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman."
Agree with this. It would be very satisfying for me to watch a scene in which she is first teasing the guy "who I imagine to be me" for a long time, and then cumming on her in the end.
I also agree about the belittling part.
My girlfriend is a lot into watching guys masturbate. I've done it on many occasions for her and to me it always feels best when facing her directly, looking in her eyes. This would also turn me on when watching porn like this. There's an interesting tension when you are clearly looking at each other and feeling a connection, but at a same time have that "distance" where the woman is clothed and looks a bit unreachable.
The belittling that often happens not only makes it unrealistic like you mention, but it takes away that tension between connection and distance. You're only left with the distance and a bit of submission.
|
07-05-19 04:09am
|
Reply
83
|
The Minion
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
It would be a big turn off for me as well. But I can imagine that for someone who is actually kind of a gross guy himself. This would be a great site. In the same sense that for example, I prefer scenes where the guy has a body similar to mine.
|
07-05-19 04:02am
|
Reply
84
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
When I read the first 3 cons I got super excited and already went to the site expecting that by the end of the review I would have joined a new amateur site. Then reading it until the end helped me save some money :-)
Balanced, honest reviews like this are what makes PU such a great community, thanks!
|
07-05-19 03:57am
|
Reply
85
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
Shen's Review
Great review, and I especially like that you mentioned the difference in style.
While the camera work is a bit more "erratic" I actually like it better. It feels a lot more real and raw. When I go back and watch some Blacked or Tushy scenes after thi, they almost appear static to me in comparison.
|
06-29-19 01:55am
|
Reply
86
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
guy7414's Review
Can you elaborate a bit more and what would make this site so awesome if it weren't for the interface?
|
06-20-19 07:13am
|
Reply
87
|
BCM.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Shen's Review
I got this error before with Chrome on some sites (not sure if it was porn or not), and it was fixed by using Firefox.
Still, as you say, it's odd that normally it doesn't happen on other sites.
|
06-03-19 04:32am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Oh, I totally get what you mean then. I haven't seen any of his stuff.
Personally I do enjoy some domination or degradation at times. Spitting in a model's face or being rough with them doesn't turn me off for example.
But if there would be a vibe to it that it's not consensual or discussed beforehand (like the example you give where it sounds like exploiting the fact that there was a lack of laws for their protection) it would be a big turn off for me. And I'd have a similar reaction, where I wouldn't want to contribute to rewarding or supporting such behavior with my money (or "views").
|
06-03-19 04:26am
|
Reply
89
|
Lucie Makes Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
MrBison's Review
I do think $20 sounds still worth it as long as the site has relative updates. Considering the exclusive nature of the content and the fact that it's amateur couples but still shot in a professional way. Will for sure check this one out when some of my budget frees up.
Please elaborate on the hot wings thing though? You've piqued my curiosity haha.
|
05-28-19 07:40am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
What is the reason for not watching Pierre Woodman's stuff, is it also something ethical? I have heard many things about James Deen but I don't know anything about the other example.
|
05-28-19 07:33am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I used to collect DVDs from a handful of actresses. But looking back to where that came from, I think it was more a compulsion to have a "complete" collection than because they were guaranteed to be good scenes.
I've seen scenes with actresses that I love but the scene was really bad. Could be anything. The director, just having a bad day,...
On the other hand, the sites I usually love the most are the ones with unknown girls that turn out to be surprisingly sexy or slutty.
So in the end it doesn't influence my decision at all (I've also stopped buying DVDs)
|
05-28-19 07:31am
|
Reply
92
|
Cuckold Sessions
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks :-)
|
05-28-19 04:54am
|
Reply
93
|
Downlow Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Awesome that you also do reviews for site which are not necessarily your cup of cum!
|
05-22-19 03:33am
|
Reply
94
|
Cuckold Sessions
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
How frequent are the updates?
|
05-22-19 03:30am
|
Reply
95
|
ChickPass Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
"Probably the broadest range of women you will ever see on a network, heavy, slim, white, black, brown, ugly, pretty, tattoos, implants, kind of like walking down a street in the United States!"
I think that's great. I definitely like diversity in terms of body type when it comes to amateur porn. It's always nice when a new update comes and it's kind of a "reveal" moment when you first see her body and don't know what it's going to look like. I've found myself aroused over many different kind of bodies just because they looked real.
How attractive are their faces generally though? Would you say that regardless of body type/ethnicity, most have a beautiful face with some lesser attractive now and then, or just the opposite?
Reason I ask:
Your review of the site definitely made it sound like something I'd spend my money on. So I went to the site, but I had a mixed impression: "Our Featured Chicks" all looked very unattractive to me. But when I scrolled down most screenshots from the scenes seemed to have very beautiful amateurs in it that I'd enjoy watching.
|
05-11-19 03:00am
|
Reply
96
|
VR Cosplay X
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review touching upon the important aspects of a site like this. Thanks!
|
05-07-19 01:56am
|
Reply
97
|
Little Asians
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Wow, they definitely do it right. I'm usually not that much of an Asian fan but every model/screenshot on the tour page trigged my arousal.
Thanks for the review! Will definitely check this one out for a month. I'd rather have just 13 perfect scenes (as you say) than 50 that I'm not going to watch.
|
05-07-19 01:49am
|
Reply
98
|
African Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the kind words!
|
05-07-19 01:33am
|
Reply
99
|
African Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Downloads are not so much disabled as discouraged:
They don't offer a download button in their members area but there was nothing to stop me from just saving the files. (Or you can use an app like Net Video Hunter, Ant Video Downloader, etc.)
|
05-07-19 01:33am
|
Review
100
|
African Casting
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous amateur girls who are obviously real first timers.
-Well adapted to mobile devices
-Billed through Segpay/Epoch
-Excellent navigation & search functionality
-Site & content consistently improves |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross sales
-No photo sets |
| Bottom Line: |
I always used to focus my collection on specific actresses. However, in recent years I’ve found that “major league” porn scenes rarely get me hard/excited anymore.
I’m usually too aware of the fact that it’s all “acted”. So I’ve been mostly looking to join sites with decent quality amateur porn (which luckily seem to be increasing in number).
It took me a while before I decided to try this site (the trusted billers and hard to find content are what convinced me to take the risk) but unexpectedly, it delivered in the areas where other sites often turn me off.
While so far most of the “African amateur porn” I found was staged tribal stuff played by US/EURO actors who themselves seemed to be uncomfortable with the questionable caricatures of their roles, the girls on this site are definitely the real deal.
They have thick accents, genuine African curves and clearly never did any porn before (the look on their faces when they take their first facial is often priceless).
Scenes range anywhere from 20 minutes to over an hour, with the longer ones being more common.
The scenes usually start with the girl thinking she’s doing an interview for a model agency. The interviewer gets their hopes up until they’re very excited, then let’s them know they’re not fit for the job (too short, too fat, too many scars, etc.).
What happens after depends on the girl… Sometimes he simply offers a career in porn instead (usually when they've done nude/bikini modeling before). But my favorite scenes are either the ones where the guy will tell them “blow job or no job” or where he simply keeps telling them they’ll never be a model until they start to ask for a deal.
Sometimes the girls are the ones to hint at sex, sometimes they simply appeal to his good heart/pity and he takes advantage of it.
The amateurs seem genuinely excited or nervous and bring a lot of personality to the scenes. The sex is usually hardcore (hard fucking, anal, face fucking). For what seems to be a one man production the guy usually does a good job at showing off the models' booty and big tits in all their glory or choosing nice angles during blowjobs/fucking.
Currently the site counts 70 exclusive scenes, and 100+ “African Fuck Tour” scenes. These last are clearly older scenes in the same style but more raw and without the fake casting aspect: Just the guy traveling to various African countries and fucking random amateur women in their houses or his hotel room. Some of them are great but in general the Casting scenes are the best ones.
There are usually about 3 new scenes per month, which I mention because it may be too slow for some of you.
While both the landing page and members area look very basic, a few things gave me the sense that the owner(s?) genuinely care about improving their user experience:
- The quality of the content seems to be getting better with every update. The oldest scenes are on the better spectrum of your typical amateur quality, the newer ones are in 4K with better editing, camera angles, etc. Some of the POV angles are especially nice in newer updates.
- The navigation and search functionality are good. Scenes are appropriately tagged and can be sorted by model too. Things I find many more “pro” sites still lack. Users can rate and comment on the scenes so it's also possible to sort by rating.
- Before joining I checked out a lot of reviews because I wasn't sure whether to take the risk on this site or not. Many of the things those reviews had mentioned as cons were already resolved by the time I joined. This was a nice contrast compared to some of the comments I’ve seen on PU by defensive website owners who refuse to improve their sites or give decent customer service.
DO I RECOMMEND THIS SITE OR NOT?
NO IF:
-You like well-known actresses and pro productions (make-up, fake fits, etc.)
-You prefer daily updates
-Pictures are more your cup of tea then videos
YES IF:
-You are looking for convincing amateur porn that is not just ripped from Chaturbate but has decent production values
-You like African women getting fucked by a white guy (POV and 3rd person view). As far as I know this is the only site serving that niche at the moment.
-You like the combination of inexperienced amateur girls that get fucked by a "pro porn dude" (Big cock, knows how to film and fuck).
I like that this site somewhat hits the sweet spot in that regard. It doesn't have the "blandness" of real couples who don't know what to do. But at the same time the male actor genuinely seems to enjoy the sex and like the women instead of "playing the porn guy" or "just doing his job". |
|
05-05-19 12:10pm
Replies (4)
|
