Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantasy Massage is included in the Adult Time network. So you get access to over 50,000 hard core videos, most of them fine to excellent quality.
-Fantasy Massage has over 2,240 massage videos.
-You get a wide variety of porn stars, in both age, body type, and sex action.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). Less prone to hacking, less records of your usage kept by your ISP.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. One PU member pointed out that Adult Time has a 300 GB daily limit, but that is a huge data allowance.
-Most videos have a choice of streaming and download definition of 160p through 1080p. But some of the newer videos go up to 4K.
-Most content is exclusive, but some videos might be found on competing sites, such as Teen Mega World (Tricky Masseur), Team Skeet (Rub A Teen), or the Wow network.
-There are accompanying photosets for most videos.
-Fame Support is excellent. It's 24/7, has live chat, email and telephone access.
Cons:
-With over 2,240 videos at Fantasy Massage, and another 50,000+ videos at the rest of the Adult Time network, there's a huge amount of content you have to search through to find the content that appeals to you. Too much of a good thing decreases the value of the site. That's a psychological trait. And the navigation can be messy.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network.
It used to be a stand-alone network of 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
It's currently a channel in the Adult Time network of massaged-themed sites.
In 2019, the Fantasy Massage network updated 3 times a week.
The current update rate is 4 updates per month.
When Fantasy Massage was a stand-alone network, it had about 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
Now that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network, navigation is less precise. If you enter "Fantasy Massage" as a search term for channel content, the search shows 2241 videos.
But trying to find what specific sites or videos are part of the Fantasy Massage channel is messed up: Trying to find a simple chronological listing of videos in many channels is unreliable: There's too much content that does not appear in a simple chronological listing, no matter how many clicks you use to find the content in a single channel, especially when the channel has 2,000 or more videos.
With the different massage sites, you get a variety of massage niches:
-Girl on girl massage.
-Girl on boy massage.
-Boy on girl massage.
-Nuru massage. Nuru massage is a Japanese erotic massage technique when both parties are nude and covered with massage lotion. Nuru massage is supposed to reduce stress and often finishes with sex.
-You get a fake incest element with the Family Sex Massage, where men and women related by marriage have sex. It's made clear this is not real incest, since the bonds are through marriage and not through blood, but fake incest is a strong niche that's been popular for several years now.
I've read that some teens use the line that sex reduces cavities in your teeth, so it's a health measure.
What's amazing is that science bears this out: zinc and calcium in semen help prevent tooth decay and prevent plaque from moving into the heart.
Strange, but true.
I think that using toothpaste with calcium, and taking vitamins with zinc and calcium is a better alternative to swallowing semen.
Just my opinion, of course.
Since you have over 2,000 massage videos, you have a wide variety of porn actors in this category. Men and women. Teens and MILFS. Body types include slender, medium, and heavy. I guess they are trying to appeal to a mass audience with the talent.
Personally, I prefer slender, white, attractive teens, but there's plenty of content to appeal to different tastes.
Some fine-looking teens getting a fantasy massage:
A few of the attractive teen stars appearing in fantasy massage include: Camila, Carolina Sweets, Catania, Chloe Cherry, Emma Piquet, Janette, Kloe, Lilu Tattoo, Liona Levi, Milana Fox, Mirta, Silvia Jons, Sofia Russo, Stacey Lewis, and Tny. The list of teen stars goes on and on.
-Porn models are usually poor actors. Combined with the foolish scripts that are common in porn, the videos can seem stupid, insead of vivid or exciting.
That should be one of the strengths of massage videos: very little acting or plot is required. You have a guy or girl come into a room to get a massage, the massage therapist works on the client and the client gradually becomes aroused, and they have sex.
So the setup is easy, and can naturally lead into sex.
For a low price, you get access to thousands of massage-themed videos and photosets.
You also get access to over 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches.
I wish the navigation was better, that you could find the content that you find most appealing.
In spite of navigation issues, the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
Although I personally find the Wow network, because of the outstanding quality of their teen models and the quality of their videos and photosets, to be an equally fine offering.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubliles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you full access to the entire network of 16 different sites.
-No download limits, no streaming limits. Many sites are starting to limit downloads, or starting to charge extra for downloads, so unlimited downloads for no extra charge is getting to be a nice feature.
-login and member pages are https, which means the pages are secure, less prone to hacking.
-Easy navigation of the site. Easy to switch between sites.
-A major strength of the site (and network) is how attractive these young teens are. Many teen sites have lots of attractive to gorgeous models, so this site and network don't stand out for the quality of the models, but you have to give the site and network credit for picking such attractive models.
-CCBill and Epoch are the primary billers, so they are trusted names, easy to cancel, easy to deal with.
-The site has 202 videos with matching photo sets on 2020-06-13.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos average 15 to 25 minutes, which is shorter than most teen hardcore sites, but the videos cover all the action needed for a hardcore porn scene.
-You can control the streaming speed of the video: from 0.25X to 2.0X.
-Can select the streaming definition from 270p through 1080p.
-Video download definition choice from 270p through 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. One of the better teen networks.
-Slow update rate. Recent updates are 1 video (and matching photo set) per month. But with the coronavirus epidemic, you take what you can get, and try to be thankful.
-The thumbnail that illustrates the model in the video is small. Would be nice to have a larger thumbnail, so you can get a better idea of what the model looks like.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The regular 1-year membership is $199. Wait for a holiday special (lots of them each year) and you should be able to join for $100 or less.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: petite teens having sex: female masturbation, lesbian sex, boy-girl sex, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 girls-1 boy.
The girls are real teens, small, cute to lovely. They put on a good show while demonstrating their appetite for sexual satisfaction.
This would be considered reality porn: it's not glamour porn, the girls are not put into glamourous settings or glamorous costumes, but they are young and attractive, and eager for sex. The sets and costumes are not glamourous, but they aren't the cheap low-rent settings and costumes of porn from 2000 or earlier that many Russian sites started out with.
The mood of the lesbian videos can be slow and sensous. It's not really seduction, more like two girls expoloring each other's bodies in a friendly, loving way.
The moods of the videos varies. It can be slow and senuous, or perky and fun, or whatever.
Since the girls are young, petite, and mainly attractive, you're just supposed to relax and enjoy these videos (and photo sets).
Most porn models are not great actors. So when you see some of them trying to do the perky teen bit, it can seem false. Dakota Fanning, not a porn model but a fine actress, when she was a pre-teen, did lots of interviews for her movies, and she came across as a cute, wonderful girl with lots of energy and enthusiasm and intelligence. And it seemed real. Watching a porn model trying to project the same bubbly image, it just seems fake. I'd much rather watch a Dakota Fanning movie made years ago than watch a blonde porn model smiling and twirling and shaking her ass and waving her arms because she's so full of fake enthusiasm and happiness for life.
Kiara Cole, fine petite teen body, shitty actress. They should write a script for her that doesn't require much acting. And less fake smiling. Along with her false eyelashes. Why do so many porn models wear false eyelashes? Less moans and groans and fake screams would make the video seem more real.
You have access to the entire Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. All the sites are teen-centric, and almost all the teen models are attractive to cute. But the site themes and plots are paper-thin.
So turn your brain off a little, to enjoy these lovely girls.
Some of the videos are crystal clear, and watching the fine bodies of these teens can be an enjoyable experience.
I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you not only have access to a site of 202 teen videos, but access to 15 other teen sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I am writing the review based on the Adult Time channel for Rocco Siffredi.
But I am also including some details on the original Rocco Siffredi site, and other sites that have channels in the Adult Time network.
-If you join Adult Time, the Rocco Siffredi channel is included, along with over 100 additional channels of porn covering a wide variety of niches.
-If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get access to the Adult Time network.
If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get direct access to over 20 porn sites, in addition to the Adult Time channels.
(I was a member of Devils Film directly in 2019, which gave me access to a large number of porn sites directly. Almost all of the porn sites are now included as channels in the Adult Time network: however, when a porn site is included as a channed in the Adult Time network, there are often differences between the Adult Time channel and the original site it's based on:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-the number of videos in the Adult Time channel are often far less than the the video count at the original site.
-The photo sets at the Adult Time channel have fewer photos than the original photo sets at the original site.
-The search engine at Adult Time returns the content for a model from the entire Adult Time network.
The search engine, at the original site returns content for a model from the site network, which is both positive and negative: it limits the content returned to the site network, so it's easier to search for the model's content at the network, filtering out much of the Adult Time network.
I don't believe you can limit the search in an Adult Time network to a single channel: Instead, a search in the Adult Time network returns all the model's content at Adult Time.
-The Rocco Siffredi channel has 2142 videos, which is a huge number of videos.
Rocco featured A-list female porn stars for many years.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join pag
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-When you join many of the sites in the Gamma Entertainment network, you also gain access to the Adult Time network. However, not all sites in the Gamma Entertainment network clearly specify whether you will get complete access to the Adult Time network. That is a major negative, because I believe that access to the Adult Time network is the crown jewel of most memberships to a Gamma Entertainment site.
-As previously noted, the search engine for Adult Time returns content from the entire Adult Time network. You can't filter the search to include only the results from a single channel.
-Also, the search engine at the Adult Time network is flawed, because it only shows a part of the model's content, instead of clearly showing her entire content listed over several pages.
-The photo sets at Rocco Siffredi channel are limited edition versions of the original photo sets.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Rocco started in porn in the 1980s, and he is still performing in porn today.
Rocco is called the Italian Stallion, because of his cult-like fame as one of the most recognizable male porn stars ever.
-Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the Adult Time network: they feel it offers a degraded version of the porn sites that are cloned into channels of the Adult Time network.
I feel that the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today, based on the following:
-A huge backlog of high quality porn-high quality based on the technical factors of a porn video.
-A wide variety of porn genres and niches.
-Easy search for a model's content the Adult Time network.
-A low membership price. Especially if you join during one of the holiday special price discounts.
I'm giving the Rocco Siffredi channel a score of 93.
That's because you get access not only to the Rocco Siffredi channel, but also get access to the excellent Adult Time network, which has over 100 channels covering a wide variety of niches, and a huge backlog of high quality hardcore porn videos and photo sets.
Because of the huge amount of content at the Rocco Siffredi channel, and also the huge amount of content at the Adult Time network, searching through the channel and network can take a lot of time and effort to find what you're looking for. That is both good and bad. But there is so much quality hardcore porn, that the search is worth the effort, and the network is a definite bargain.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models range from pretty to lovely. Mainly slim bodies, white, late teens to early twenties.
-The quality of the videos and photo sets is high class. Excellent lighting, focus, sound control.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Choice of definition for downloading and streaming, from 480p through 4K.
-You can steam or download the entire video, or select the parts you want to play or download.
-Most videos have an accompanying photo set, which can be downloaded in 1000px, 2000px, and 4000px.
-Navigation is basic but simple. You can search by Updates, Films, Galleries, Models.
Cons:
-I believe the cons are minor. This is one of the better sites for quality teen porn.
The reasons are shown in the pro section above: the lovely teen models, the technical quality of the videos and photo sets.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-The customer support can be poor. They require you to use a ticketing system, and you don't always get a response to your requests. That is the Ultra Film support system, which is called onetouchservice. The Vendo support is much better.
Bottom Line:
If you like the Wow Girls and Wow Porn or All Fine Girls sites, you should like the Ultra Films site as well.
They use the same models, the same style of porn, which could be called glamcore, in that the content is more or less spontaneous sex. The sex is either solo masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, or threesomes or more between girls, girls with a guy, girls with two guys.
Not a lot of romance or plot, just some kissing or fondling before they get down to the blowjobs and vaginal and anal intercourse or fingering and licking etc.
I believe the site was started around 2017-06, when Ultra 4K videos were becoming popular on porn sites. Which is why they called the site Ultra Films, because the site features videos with definitions up to 4K.
(Teen Mega World also started a site in 2015 called Beauty 4K which featured videos up to 4K definition. But for years, all the new videos at all the sites at Teen Mega World go up to 4K definition, so it's not the newest fad any more.)
Having said that 4K is no longer the newest fad, some PU members really seem to enjoy the 4K experience.
I don't have the equipment to enjoy or appreciate the 4K experience. Maybe it's my age (I'm over 70), or my eyesight, or the lack of high end equipment, but I can't tell or appreciate the increased value of videos that are above 720p.
And if I download content (video or photo sets), the lower definition content takes far less storage space than the higher definition content.
If I download a 4000px, 2000px and 1000px photo set of the same photo set, and watch the photos in a slide show with Windows Photo Viewer (a photo viewer software that comes with Windows 10 on some editions), I can't tell the difference visually between the different definition photos.
However, if I use IrfanView software (another photo viewer software that is free), and expand a single photo, I can tell the difference in the definition of a single photo.
But that is not the way I view these photos. I usually use a slide show player to view them.
Or, I can stop the slide show, to view a single photo, but I don't usually expand the photo the examine it in blow-up mode.
So, for me, downloading high definition videos and photos is mainly a waste of storage space.
And 4K videos use up a lot of storage space fast.
That's me.
There seem to be enough PU members that appreciate 4K content that it's a significant factor in their enjoyment of a porn site.
And the same for Virtual Reality sites. There are PU members who enjoy and subscribe to Virtual Reality porn sites.
I don't have virtual reality equipment. So virtual reality sites don't interest me very much.
Although the sites can also be viewed without virtual reality equipment.
But mainly virtual reality porn is best skipped over if you don't have virtual reality equipment.
Bottom line:
The Ultra Films site is a quality offering from the people who run the Wow Girls\Wow Porn sites.
You have the same lovely teen models, the same type of porn: spontaneous sex between young teens,
filmed in clear, crisp images with solid colors, and excellent technical factors.
How can they improve the site:
If you join any one of the three sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), you get immediate access to all 3 sites.
Ultra Films is a separate site.
If they added Ultra Films to the other 3 sites in a single membership, that would more content added for the same price.
That would be great for the porn customer.
But not so great for the porn producer, who is trying to increase revenues, by offering sites with different memberships.
The newest offering from these people is LustWeek.com.
Which uses the same models seen at the other sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, Ultra Films) I've mentioned, in the same high quality porn.
The LustWeek site focuses on a new model each week. And these models can be fucking lovely.
I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 93.
It's definitely worth checking out, if you are a fan of All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn.
However, joining all of these worthwhile sites can get to be very expensive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join Teen Fidelity, Porn Fidelity, or Kelly Madison, you get access to all 3 sites.
-There are special discounts throughout the year where you can join for $9.95 for the first month.
-You choose your own username and password, which is easier to remember than some computer-generated login detail.
-The login and member pages are https. Which means it's harder to hack.
-The videos are vivid and crisp. The storylines can be imaginative: I don't mean science fiction or fantasy, but there is a plot with a dark sense of humor.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-There is a "Bonus Content" section that advertises 100,000+ scenes. I'm not sure what that includes.
I have too many subs, I don't have the time to look them over, I even forget which subs I have active.
But the Bonus Content appears to be access to a huge amount of hardcore videos from different sources.
Some of the featured channels are Party Hardcore, Mr Skin, Vivid, and Club Seventeen.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I click on the Club Seventeen link, and see DVDs listed. I click on the DVD for
"Sweethearts Porn Tour 4", and see Barbamiska, one of my all-time favorite porn models in action. Such a tiny bundle of sex, smiley face, small, tender breasts, a wet dream come true.
CONS
-You can often find specials for the first month of $9.95, but the renewal price is $29.95/month.
And the price for 3 months is $59.95, recurring. So this is an expensive network if you want a longer-term membership.
-In the bonus content section, when you click on a DVD, and bring up a scene, they don't list the name of the model. So you can't search the videos for your favorite models by name. That's a shame, because there appears to be a huge amount of content in the bonus section (they advertise 100,000+ scenes), and the navigation is hit-and-miss searching.
However, there are so many gems I can see right away, that the bonus section by itself is worth a membership.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
If they organized the bonus content with a good search engine and a few other improvements, the bonus section would be a strong challenger to the Adult Time network.
-Please don't mis-understand. The Porn Fidelity, and Teen Fidelity and Kelly Madison sites have strong videos that are well worth watching. But the Bonus Content, although the video crispness does not match the 3 main sites, is also well worth watching.
-The bonus content is streaming only. You can't select different difinitions. You can't download.
It's almost like a tease, because I'd love to save some of these video gems.
-For the bonus content, the controls are limited: no way to select definition for streaming (just a single default definition), can not watch in full screen, etc.
-Sometimes you get an error message: "A network error caused the media download to fail part-way."
Checking my PC, it does not appear that the video failed to download to my PC. So I assume the error message means that the video is not available for streaming at the moment. Except that when I try to stream it, it does stream. (As I already mentioned, you can't download the bonus content.)
BOTTOM LINE
Dixie Lynn in "Pause Challenge" shows a fresh face in porn (at least, one I haven't seen before).
She has one video at Teen Fidelity.
She gives a great impression of a bubbly teenager, or else she really is a bubbly teenager with lots of enthusiasm.
The content at Teen Fidelity is well worth viewing. They have A-list porn stars, good sets, good lighting and sound control, good camera-work. The content is excellent quality.
The site is large, with around 400 videos plus matching photo sets.
For the special price of $9.95 for the first month, you are getting more than your money's worth.
I don't see a listing for a 1-year membership, but it could cost over $200, which is very expensive, considering there are many fine networks available at $100 or less.
The site and network are easy to use, navigation is not a problem for the 3 main sites. The bonus section does have issues, such as search problems, you can download bonus content, you can only stream in one definition, and other issues.
I'm giving the Teen Fidelity a score of 92, because the videos have a strong, erotic flavor that is refreshing, and you get 2 other great sites included in a membership.
You also get the bonus content: which is definitely worth looking over.
With the bonus content, you have to use a hunt and peck approach, there is no search engine to find a particular model or scene, that I can find. But some of the content, although from years ago, is worth viewing: I just wish I could download some of the bonus content of some of my favorite models.
Maybe I will join those sites directly, when I have more time. I already have more subs, both porn and non-porn, that I can't enjoy because there's only 24 hours in a day, and I have subs to Netflix, Starz, Amazon Prime, Hulu, as well as a bunch of porn sites that I don't have the time to visit very much.
But I would give Teen Fidelity an A for quality of content, A for amount of content, and A for value: you are more than getting your money's worth (at least for the $9.95 for the first month membership).
But the longer term memberships are very expensive, so they have less value.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Warning: if you are going to join the Teen Mega World network, I strongly recommend that you join through the Teen Mega World network site. And not through one of the satellite sites.
The reason is simple: If you join through the Teen Mega World site directly, your search for a model's content returns her content at the entire network.
But if you join through one of the satellite sites, your search for a model's content is limited to her content at the site you joined with.
This means, finding what the model's content at other sites would be a difficult, time-consuming effort.
And that recommdation is worth the entire review, by itself.
The network did an update several years ago, where they changed the search engine to:
if you join through TMW site directly, your search covers the entire network.
if you join through one of the TMW network sites, your search is limited to the site you joined through.
Cons:
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So, unless you are willing to spend hours trying to find what sites the model has content at, and then trying to access that content, which would involve logging to the site, then clicking through the thumbnail pages to find the page (or pages) where her content was listed, most of the content at TMW would be unavailable, because it takes too much time and effort to find it.
I find it amazing that no PU members have complained about the limited search at the TMW satellite sites over the last few years.
Maybe it's because few members have joined the TMW sites, or have written reviews about the TMW sites, in the last few years.
TMW has been kind enough to give me a separate membership to TMW, because of the navigation difficulties I am describing, with my Teen Sex Movs membership.
I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs, which I've kept for a few years now.
But my search with the Teen Sex Movs membership is limited to that site, does not cover the TMW network.
Bottom Line:
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So if you want to find content at the site you have opened, you can't use the search: you have to page through the thumbnails of the site videos. Using the search will only return content from your join site, even when you have opened up a different site to explore.
I am puzzled why no other PU members have commented on the search problems at the TMW sites.
Because the search problems started years ago, and have never been fixed.
PROS(START OF): Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network (also known as TMW).
The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite hardcore networks.
Most of the teen models are real teens (when they start out).
The average model is cute or attractive. And they have some teens that are more than just attractive: they are lovely to beautiful.
-Video definitions offered in multiple definitions, including 4K (UHD).
-Can stream or download, with no limits.
-Easy to switch between sites in the network.
-You get access to the entire network with a subscription to any one of the sites. But you should join through the TMW site itself, for search and access to the content. Otherwise, finding the content of specific models would be a time-consuming task.
-You get access to over 30 sites with a join to any site in the network, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-The network has over 5,000 videos, and over 2,000 models.
-Cons
-If you join through one of the network sites other than the main TMW site itself, your search only returns content from the site you joined through. That applies even when you open a different site in the network (you are still logged in to your join site).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The site only updates one new video per month. However, the network updates every 1 or 2 days.
-Vendo is the billing agent. This is a proprietary biller. But I've joined many times using this biller, and never had a problem.
BOTTOM LINE:
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is limited to the site you join through.
If you join through the main TMW site itself, your search covers the entire network.
Thus, if you join through a satellite site, you will not be able to find the content of any model except at your join site.
That means:
1. You won't know what content the model has at the network.
2. Even if you spend the time to search for which sites in the network have that model's content, accessing the content is a time-consuming task: because you have to open each specific site itself, and then page through the thumbnail listings to find where her content is listed, and then bring up the video or photoset.
3. On the other hand, if you join through the main TMW site, the search lists the model's content for the entire network, with hot links to her content. So it's easy to find--and access--her content.
Bottom line: If you join through the main TMW site itself, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 93. Because it's then easy to find and access the content of each model.
But if you join through Fuck Studies, or one of the TMW satellite sites, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 70.
Because, unless you write to the TMW support staff, and they give you a free TMW site membership, it's too time-consuming to find or access the content at the network.
The TMW network is one of my favorite networks for hardcore teen porn.
But I believe the network is shooting itself in the foot with the limited search at its satellite sites. I believe they have lost a lot of customer business because of the poor search function.
They need to re-write the network code, to allow each site to have a search that covers the entire network.
A membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
But since the search is limited to your join site, actually finding what the content includes, and then trying to access the content you want to view, is a time-consuming task.
Unless you have joined through the main TMW site itself.
I've said that TMW is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
That is because the models are real teens.
And they mainly range from attractive to very attractive.
The girls put on a show where they appear to really enjoy getting off.
So it's a pleasure watching these videos.
And each video has a matching photo set, that is nice quality.
(I assume the photo sets were made from some software program, but the photos are good quality:
nice focus, nicely centered, good lighting, etc.)
So, I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you get access to the entire network, with unlimited streaming and downloading.
But if you are unlucky enough to join through one of the satellite sites, it would be a massive task to find the content at the network.
Unless you ask their support team for a membership to the TMW site itself, which is what I've done for the last few years.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There are secure and non-secure versions of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. Use the secure version, if you can find it. (https).
-The network has over 30 sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-Membership in any one of the satellite sites gives you access to the entire network of sites.
-The network has over 2,000 teen models, most of them attractive to very attractive.
-Navigation has recently improved with the last network update. The search used to be network-wide only if you joined through the main TMW site, but now I believe the search is network-wide if you join any satellite site in the network. I am basing this on the following: I have a membership in Teen Sex Movs. I also have a membership in the main Teen Mega World site. The reason I have a membership in the TMW site is because until recently, the search at Teen Sex Movs (like the search at any of the satellite sites) was restricted to the site you joined through.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So I requested a membership in the TMW site, because that search was network wide, and the customer service people at TMW were kind enough to give me a complimentary membership to TMW, because I was a paying member of Teen Sex Movs.
The join-specific search function was a major barrier to finding and accessing the content of any model, since you were limited to results from your join site.
So you could not find the contents of a model, except at your join site.
You would not know what contents she had: and even if you employed work-around methods to learn she has content at other network sites, it would be a massive task accessing that content.
The last, recent network update made the search for each site network-wide, instead of join-site specific, so finding and accessing the content of a model at the network is now made easy.
CONS(START OF):
-Many of the sites are archive sites that stopped updating years ago.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
For many years, the network introduced new sites, then stopped updating them within a year or two. This was to increase the number of sites they could advertise as being in the network, as well as trying new ideas for porn sites.
-Some of the archive sites are not maintained well. You can't stream videos from some sites, but you can download the videos and play them on your PC.
-The quality of the videos from the older archive sites can reflect the cheap, low-rent style of the network when it was just starting: the video definition can be 720p or lower, the sets are cheap, the over-all quality is just lower than the high quality videos and photosets that have been produced over the last several years.
-Uses proprietary billers: Fxbilling, VENDO, Centrobill. I have used VENDO many times over the years (for TMW subs), and never had a problem. But CCBILL and Epoch are more familiar names, and easier to deal with.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Teen Mega World (AKA TMW) is one of the best hardcore teen networks on the internet.
That is a strong statement to make.
There are several reasons for this:
-There used to be a low membership price, of $90/year. But they raised the price to $119.40/year, and I've seen it priced as high as $149.88. So what used to be a low-priced network has become a medium- or high-priced network. I recommend waiting for a holiday special to get a discounted membership at $90/year or less.
-The selection of teen models is good to excellent. The girls are real teens. And most of them are naturally attractive. Not much effort is put into making them beautiful, with make-up or glamorous costumes, but the girls are young and naturally attractive, and seem to really enjoy exploring their bodies for sex.
-Over the years, the network has evolved from a low-rent collection of hardcore teen videos to putting time, money and effort into upgrading the videos and photosets. They have offered 4K videos at many of their sites for a few years. They even have a site dedicated to 4K videos. And a virtual reality site was added a few years ago. Overall, the quality of the videos and phtosets are good to excellent, with more expensive sets, upgraded lighting, high quality video camera equipment, better sound editing, etc.
-They recently did a network upgrade which fixed a serious search problem. For the last couple of years, if you joined through one of the satellite sites, your search was limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switched to one of the other sites, your search was still limited to your join site. But the last upgrade made the search cover the entire network: now, when you enter a model's name, the search returns her content at the entire network, instead of only at your join site. And the search returns hot links to the models content, so, instead of having to log in to each individual site, you can access her entire content from a single search.
-Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment. There are currently over 30 sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-5,000+ videos.
-2,000+ models.
-PU has a discounted price to the network of $14.95/month (recurring), for people who want a shorter membership. The normal listed price is $29.95/month (recurring).
-Recent update rate is 3 new videos every 4 days for the network. This is slower than before, but most porn sites are reacting to the financial downturn that started in 2008 and has caused many fine porn sites to close.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A fine network focusing on teen porn.
-Many of the models are cute young teens.
-Multiple definitions for streaming and downloads.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell.
-Video and photoset quality is extremely good.
-They often have promo discounts throughout the year.
You can often get the first month for $9.95.
Or you can join for a year at $84.
Those prices are found throughout the year, if you do a bit of searching.
-Login and member pages are https.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-The worst con is the stupid plots that are featured of some of the sites.
The models (and stunt cocks) are supposed to act like brainless idiots who fool around until they start having sex. Then it's supposed to get more serious. And the audience is supposed to laugh at the stupid models. Except I find it really annoying, and it ruins many of the scenes.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The first page you see is a page full of ads when you log in. Then you get to the member's area, and you see a bunch more ads. You paid for a membership, why can't we get a clean, uncluttered member's area?
-Some PU members have complained that download and streaming speeds are throttled. Other PU members say they've experienced no problems with downloads or streaming.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen-oriented hardcore network. But the sex is basically soft or mild, not harsh, abrasive, or cruel.
Many of the sites take a parody-like approach to sex.
Which is not my favorite.
The models are supposed to be brainless bimbos. And the stunt cocks are supposed to be shy goof-balls who are timid about sex and what the girls are offering. That theme gets tired fast. Except someone must appreciate it, because they keep pumping out this product continously.
On the other hand, I really appreciate porn with a sensible or believable plot. With a little tenderness or feeling. Or even a bit of cruelty, if done right. But not the mindless sex on display at Nubiles Porn.
Except the network does have a lot to offer:
-A catalog of alluring teen models.
-First rate production qualities in the videos and photos.
-Easy navigation.
-Good search.
-Access to the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn starlets from 2004 through today.
So in spite of the stupid plots featured at many of the sites, the alluring models keep me a member.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all the sites.
-30 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches. The main theme is teens.
-Unlimited streaming
-Unlimited downloads
-Video definition offered in 360p through 2160p.
-The site has 255 videos. Plus matching photosets.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. Site averages less than 1 new video per month.
-Slow, irregular update rate for the network: anywhere from 0 to 5 new videos per month.
-The "Recent Updates" page has posted dates for the videos, but there is no posting date for most of the videos or photosets in the members area.
-Most of the sites in the network are not updating.
-Most of the models speak Russian. But after watching Russian porn for many years, I've learned that "Aaaahhh", "Uhhhhhh", and other moans and groans sound alike in Russian, English, German and Spanish. The Japanese sex moans and groans are different: they sound like the girls are crying, which takes getting used to.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is teachers fucking their young students.
The main attraction of the site and network is the level of attractiveness of the models.
Models are teens or in their twenties.
If you're into teen porn models, you've seen many of these girls at other teen sites, such as Lets Doe It, Joymii, Metart network, Teen Mega World network, Nubiles, Wow network. I mean, these girls are showcased all over the internet at teen sites. They are attractive to lovely, and they are worth watching in action.
The action is mainly one girl with an older man, or sometimes two girls with an older man. The older man can be anywhere from his thirties to early fifties. Not a lot of real older grandpa types. The guys are supposed to be teachers or tutors, so it makes sense that they aren't the real older guys found on some old/young sites.
The main reason the girls are cute is because of their youth. But they are also chosen because they are naturally attractive. Firm, tight bodies, the smile of enjoying life before they've been beaten down by disappointments.
The plots are minimal. The girls are supposedly horny, and start groping their tutor/teacher on the slightest excuse. Or the tutor whips out his cock because he wants to get his rocks off. I mean, these are Russian stunt cocks, and they know the girls are eager to suck cock or get their pussies fucked (Russian porn models are not only cute, they've bypasssed fake shyness and are willing and eager to have sex).
So this isn't glamcore, but straight hardcore teen/older man sex.
I've read that many movie stars became actors because they were shy as children.
And even when these actors become world famous, they are still shy in their private lives.
Maybe that's the reason Russian teens go into porn: to overcome their fears of sex.
On camera, Russian teens can put on a great show.
And even if most of them aren't great actors, with a minimal plot, there's very little acting required, beyond moaning and groaning to show how excited they are when getting fucked.
Which is good, because that eliminates the need for the porn writer to think up meaningful plots.
The basic premise is: you have a teen girl, who is supposed to be studying with a tutor: And then, after a few minutes, BAM, the girl is sucking his cock, or getting screwed.
The cuteness of the models, their enthusiasm for sex, obviates the need for plot.
And the older guys are lucky to be able to fuck these cuties and get paid for it.
I'm giving the site a score of 93. You get a large site (255 videos and matching photosets), plus access to about 30 other teen-oriented sites. There are 5 sites featuring old/young in the network, with other sites featuring virgin sex, anal sex, lesbian, cocksucking, baby sitters, etc.
The main draw of the site and the network is the level of attractiveness of the teen models.
Navigation is basically simple.
I wish the content had posting dates, because it would be nice to see if the model is still active, or if the content was filmed years ago.
But if you're into teen porn, this site will give you plenty of teen starlets.
If you enjoy the old/young niche, you get 5 sites.
And if you don't like old/young, you still get maybe 10,000 other teen videos in 25 other sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: I am including a lot of information about the Adult Time network, which includes the 21 Sextury network. This is because I think that 21 Sextury is a worthwhile join, but the value of the Adult Time network (an added bonus in membership to 21 Sextury) increases the value of a 21 Sextury membership by a large factor.
-21 Sextury is a network that is included in the Adult Time network.
Joining any channel in the Adult Time network gives you access to most of the Adult Time network.
-21 Sextury used to be a network of hardcore sites featuring mainly European models. There were over 50 plus sites in the 21 Sextury network, which was a huge amount of hardcore material. But as a channel in the Adult Time network, you gained access to over 50,000 hardcore videos. That video count has now risen to over 60,000 videos. And the Adult Time network now has over 250 channels. With 5 new releases per day for the Adult Time network.-
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Note: the figures for video and channel count for Adult Time are not exact: different pages of the Adult Time network show different counts for the number of channels and the number of videos and the model count. That just adds to the confusing mess that the Adult Time network is.
-21 Sextury and Adult Time have thousands of A-list models, along with plenty of B-list models. So you not only get a massive count of beautiful models, but also a lot of different age groups, different body types.
-The technical quality of the videos at 21 Sextury and Adult Time are high quality: professional directing, good focus, good lighting, excellent colors, good sound control, nice sets.
-The technical quality of the much older videos are of lower quality, of course. For example, a 2004 video offers definitions from 160p to 540p, and the lighting and colors are not the excellent quality of more recent videos. But those videos can still be watched for the curiosity value.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-21 Sextury covers a wide range of niches. Straight fucking, anal fucking, blowjobs, pussy licking. Mainly one guy and girl, but also solo girl, gg, bgg.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for most memberships. There is a lower-cost membership which is streaming only. But most PU members prefer to have the download choice included.
-Offers some 4K videos. But most of the recent videos are offered in 288p through 1080p. This is negative for PU members who demand the highest quality definition for their wide monitors, but acceptable for most PU members, I think.
-Customer support provided by Fame Support is excellent. There is a fast, responsive live chat that is 24/7.
-Login and member pages are https. So secured connection, less likely to be hacked.
CONS(START OF):
-Although 21 Sextury is not perfect, and Adult Time is not perfect, I think that the combination is one of the best bargains in porn today.
-The most important con about 21 Sextury and the Adult Time network is that the contents are a jumbled mess. They need a software engineer to organize the network and channel contents into an organized system that is easily searchable. A simple model listing for each network, for each channel. A simple listing of the videos for each network and for each channel. An upgrade of the search engine, to make it easier to use.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-21 Sextury and Adult Time has very little homosexual content, that I've seen. So not good for gay viewers.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
21 Sextury has been around for many years before it was folded into the Adult Time network.
21 Sextury network was launched in 2009, featuring mainly European models in hardcore action.
At one time the network had up to 58 sites. Which meant it was a large network covering many different niches.
Around 2018 most of the 21 Sextury network was added to the Adult Time network. At first, the merger was a hit-or-miss connection: If you joined 21 Sextury, sometimes they threw in the Adult Time network for free, other times a membership in 21 Sextury did not include Adult Time membership. At least one PU member was told he was getting Adult Time access with his 21 Sextury membership join, but did not get it. Contacting customer support did not solve the problem for him.
There are times when you can't depend on what a porn site advertises, or what the customer support team tells you. Which can be a major disappointment.
My story was different: I joined 21 Sextury on 2018-10-31, and got an email telling me I got free admission to Adult Time, as long as I kept my 21 Sextury membership.
At the time, I had no idea what Adult Time was. But soon found out it was a huge network with over 50,000 hardcore videos, and over 100 channels, covering a wide variety of niches. And the Adult Time network has only grown and expanded from there, adding more channels and more videos.
My favorite channel in the Adult Time network is Pure Taboo: plot-driven videos of twisted desire (the taboo element in the porn) with an artistic flavor and high production values.
I have been satisfied with my 21 Sextury membership, and I've kept it continuously since my Oct 2018 join.
I don't think the network is perfect. The navigation is messy, and needs to be simplified.
Not all the content appeals to me, but there is more than enough content, along with frequent daily updates, that I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
21 Sextury used to be a large network of porn sites in the Gamma Entertainment stable.
Around 2018, a 21 Sextury channel was added to the Adult Time network.
At that time, 21 Sextury still existed as a separate network, in addition to being a channel in the Adult Time network.
The navigation for the Adult Time network in 2018, and for 21 Sextury, used to be simple and clean, and even though both networks had a massive amount of content (videos and photos), it was fairly easy to find model listings, and content listings, for the sites in 21 Sextury, and the equivalent model listings and content listings for the Adult Time channels.
But recently, that simple clarity has evaporated.
Adult Time keeps adding new content: channels, videos, photosets.
Instead of keeping the channels separated, with a simple listing of models and videos, they drop the content into the Adult Time network, and you can't find simple model lists and video lists for each channel.
What good is 50,000 or 60,000 videos, if you don't know what they are, or how to access them?
Size is good, until it becomes so overwhelming that it becomes a jumbled mess of channels and videos.
The network needs to hire a software engineer to make navigation simple.
Otherwise, there's a ton of worthwhile content, but finding the content is a pain in the ass.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks. Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion.
Bottom Line:
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A great catalog of high quality hardcore porn for a low price.
I suggest waiting for a holiday special, either to the main network or to one of the many sites that give you access to the Adult Time network with membership. There are many sites that do this, and during holidays, you can sometimes find some really nice bargain.
PU has a discounted price of $95.40/year recurring, or $19.95/month recurring.
Those are nice prices, but I joined for $62.95/year, and have kept that membership active, since it's easier for me to visit the site and see what's new and what's old, rather than trying to download a boatload of content and try to look for specials again. The specials do pop up at holidays, but I haven't found any at $63 again. But Devils Film and 21 Sextury and other site/networks advertise holiday special rates all the time, except that most of the ads are for $95.40/year that the PU site gives you anyway.
-Login and member pages are secure.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I get nervous on sites that are non-secure, with each login stating "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
In addition to being more easily hacked, your ISP keeps a record of your visits to these porn sites, the site and the member pages you visit, and which is available to your friendly law enforcement people, as well as major spy organizations which the US government either denies or states: "No comment."
-They have a huge number of A-list models, as well as B-list models, and maybe C-list and D-list models. And you can find all types of female models (from cute and attractive to un-attractive) and male models (young and old).
-They cover so many niches. But it seems to be light on gay porn (homosexual). The network is strong on lesbian porn, but weak on gay (homosexual) porn. I'm making the distinction, which might be old-fashioned, because when I was younger, I thought gay meant both guys liking guys and girls liking girls.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But in today's world, there are so many distinctions and politically correct attitudes, I don't know if gay includes lesbian, or if gay only includes male/male.
-No download or streaming limits. But they do offer a streaming-only membership, for a lower price.
-Downloads and streaming are offered in different definitions.
-Zip file for the photosets. But some photosets are a reduced number of photos from the original sites, sometimes 10 photos in a photoset.
CONS(START OF):
-They have a huge catalog of hardcore content covering many niches, many channels (they call their sites channels). Which is great. Except that the content is massive, they've advertised over 50,000 videos for years, they keep adding more videos, more channels, more series, and navigating that content becomes a chore, to find what interests you.
They really need to do a network re-design to simplify the navigation: to make searching the content easier.
Too much of a good thing, because they keep adding more content, and, to me, at least, it has become a jumbled mess.
-If you want to find and search the contents of a single channel, it's not easy: A year or two ago, it was much easier to bring up a chronological listing of the videos of a single channel. But not any more. You have to dig to find most of the videos of a single channel, which is frustrating: I want a site or network that is easy to use.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today:
-A massive collection of high quality hardcore videos. 50,000+.
-A massive collection of featured models, both female and male. The network is light on gay porn, but massive on straight porn and lesbian porn.
-A low membership price, especially if you can find a decent holiday special discount.
-Although I think the navigation is poor, because there's so much content I think it's a jumbled mess, they do organize the content into channels, and you can more-or-less find the content of a single model with links to her content at the entire network. So it takes time to find the content that appeals to you, but there is a huge amount of content that should be appealing for straight hardcore porn (which I assume includes lesbian porn, since that is one of the main strengths of the network).
-The Pure Taboo channel is one of my favorite channels at the Adult Time network. This is cinematic quality porn that is story-driven. One of the best hardcore story-driven channels on the internet.
The plots are about twisted desires, the lighting is usually dark for artistic reasons: I would prefer brighter lighting, but they are trying to create cinema with an artistic approach. Not to everyone's taste, but I find some of the stories interesting and erotic.
I don't know why, but one of the major strengths of the network is their focus on lesbian porn. Mainly young girls, but there are plenty of older women in the lesbian porn as well. And you get a wide range of models: in age, in body type. The models are mainly white. Not a lot of black or Asian.
You also get live cams. I'm not into live cams. So other than mentioning they are available, I haven't used them.
Adult Time is trying to be the modern supermarket of porn. They have over 50,000 hardcore videos, most of them high quality, plus they have over 100 channels, and keep adding more all the time. I think they are doing a very good job of one-stop-shopping for the porn consumer.
That's for the straight audience.
I think they are light on the homosexual audience with their offerings.
Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the network because they have seen a lot of the content from previous memberships at different sites. But that's what the Adult Time network does: it's gobbling sites and content from outside sites, and making that content part of the Adult Time network. And it keeps growing, with both internal content (that is original) and external content (that is taken from other sites).
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month recurring.
-Newer videos from the last few years go from 360p up to 2160p.
-Site updates with one new video per month. This is a slow update rate. But the network updates with 6 updates per week. So you get plenty of updates, especially in the coronavirus epidemic.
-The models are real teens from Eastern Europe. Mainly attractive to really cute.
-Navigation is good. You can easily switch between sites in the network. Or, to examine a single site, you can page through the update listing of videos.
-The model page will list the girl's contents at the entire network, with hot links to bring up her content.
-Zip file for each photoset. But it comes in only one definition.
-The zip file for the photoset lists the model's name, but you have to manually add the site and whatever other data you want to keep track of for the photoset.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads. Nice feature, when many porn sites are switching to a limited download model.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can create your own login details: username and password, instead of computer-generated.
-Tags are simple but useful. A sample tag from a video:
Blowjob Cowgirl Creampie Doggy Style HD Video Photos Pigtales Pussy Licking Reverse Cowgirl Shaved UHD
CONS(START OF):
-Login and member pages are not secure.
-Poor search engine. Enter the name of a model, and you get a garbage number of random hits.
-Several PU members have criticized the cream pies as fake.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo is the default biller, not a major name. But I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem.
Bottom Line:
BOTTOM LINE
Site stats:
Videos: 219
Photosets: 219
Number of photos per set: around 99.
The photosets are made from the video shoot. But the photos are good quality.
Not MetArt quality, but good quality for a hardcore shoot.
I would like the photos to be even better, because these girls are cute teens to really attractive.
Each photo is 3500pX2333p.
The photo size is surprisingly large: around 1 MB.
The videos have an average runtime of under 30 minutes.
File sizes for the video downloads
360p MP4 273 MB
480p MP4 479 MB
720p MP4 1.07 GB
1080 MP4 1.67 GB
2160 MP4 2.88 GB
I was suprised the 2160p file size was not larger.
A 4k image file is 4 times larger than a 1080p HD image file.
Resolution wise, 4K (2160p) is twice the size of 2K (1080p) in horizontal direction and twice the size in vertical dimension. Since Area=Length x Width, Area wise, it's 4 times larger than 2k.
That refers to a photo's dimensions. But you would think the video file would have a similar effect.
But there are other factors involved, of course.
Site theme: creampies. And the site delivers on that promise.
However, serveral PU members have commented the cream pies are fake, which hurts the video.
Basically, you get a b/g, and they have sex. Pretty bread-and-butter, not a lot of build-up, just a horny guy and a horny young teenager. What helps is the teen is an attractive girl, and she's eager for sex. The sex is hardcore, but mild: no slapping, spitting, arm-twisting. Just sex.
So if you're looking for over-the-edge sex, you should try a different site.
The main strength of the site is the attractive roster of teen models.
They are willing and ready to suck dick, have their pussies eaten, and get a creampie at the finish.
Login is easy, especially if you have cookies enabled.
No captcha to solve, which is great, because the captchas at some sites are ridiculous.
Navigation is easy: to find the content of a model, go to her model page, and you will see hot links to her videos at the site and network.
Giving the site a score of 92. It's a nice-sized site (219 videos), plus you have over 5,000 videos at the network. The slow update rate of 1 video per month at the site is made up for with the 6 videos per week at the network, plus the large catalog of network videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Site is part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Navigation is easy. You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login with username and password.
-There is a good models listing, that has a nice thumbnail of each model, with hot links to her content at the entire network, not just to the Beauty Angels site.
However: the model listing at each site only includes the models at that site, and not the entire network. If you want a model listing of the entire network, you have to switch to the Teen Mega World site, which does have a model listing that includes all the network models.
-The site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. Which is an amazing update rate, since the other 5 video/photoset updates are scattered over the rest of the network each week.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site (and network) features Eastern European models: almost all white, mainly slender, ranging from attractive to lovely, even though not a lot of effort is put into making the girls glamourous: the models are just fresh, young, naturally attractive teens. That is one of the strengths of the site and network: how attractive these teens are.
-The girls are naturally attractive. Almost no fake boobs.
You can find a lot of these models at the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn models are among the cutest, most attractive teen models on the internet, which is one of the strengths of those sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites put a little more effort into making their models appear attractive: I wouldn't call the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites glamour sites, because I think a glamour site requires a glamour approach or maybe a heartcore approach with a little romance, and the Wow sites are straight sex with little romance or glamour.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-No download limits. No streaming limits.
-Videos for the last few years can be streamed from 360p through 2160p.
-Videos for the last few years can be downloaded from 360p through 2160p.
They started offering 2160p videos around June 2016.
They started offering 1060p videos around May 2014.
The site started around 2011, when they were offering 360 -720p, I believe.
This makes a difference if you insist on higher quality definition to watch a video.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are minor. This is one of my favorite hardcore teen sites, and I've been a continuous member for several years.
-They advertise a discount for the first month of $7.49, which is called an "Easter Discount".
Edit: this is misleading. The $7.49 for the first month, is for a year-long membership, which costs
$89.95 for a year, recurring. I think this is a trick that porn companies often do, quoting a 1-month membership for a low price, and you don't find it's for a year-long membership until you click on the join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. So could be hacked. And your ISP keeps a record of each page you visit.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many memberships with Vendo to different sites over the years, and never had a problem.
-The search function is poor. The search at Beauty Angels only returns content from the Beauty Angels site. If you do a search for a specific model, only her content at the Beauty Angels site is returned, and nothing from other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
However, on the last update to the network, they messed up the search at the Teen Mega World site. If you joined through the Teen Mega World network itself, and do a search for a model by name, you are returned a jumbled mess of names that is useless.
If you want to search for a model's content at the network, you need to join through the Teen Mega World site itself, and not through one of the satellite sites. And then, you need to bring up the model listing, click on the model's name in the listing (not from the search box), and then you can find the model's content at the network.
-Models are white Eastern European teens. If you want other races or ethnicities, or age groups, you won't find it here.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: The models are girls from 18 through early 20s. The girls are either showing off their fresh young bodies, or masturbating.
There is also girl/girl lesbian sex.
Boys are a rarity, mainly appearing in the early years of the site.
For many years now, it's only solo girl or girl/girl sex.
The site has 495 videos, plus matching photosets.
The main strength of the site (and network) are the attractive teen models.
Personally, I think the yearly price of $89.95 is a bargain, but if you search, you can sometimes find a yearly membership even cheaper.
You get 33 teen sites with a membership to any one of the Teen Mega World sites.
That covers a wide variety of niches.
Many of the sites have not updated in years.
But Beauty Angels updates with a new video and photoset each week.
They advertise daily updates for the network. But if you check the update dates, there are 6 new videos and photosets each week.
That is still a large amount of porn each week, with a huge amount of hardcore teen content from the network.
A second strength of the site (and network) is the simplicity of the videos. There's very little acting, which is a good thing, because most porn models are lousy actresses. You have a girl, she strips, then masturbates. Or you have two girls, who kiss, fondle each other, and start solo masturbation or masturbating each other, or have lesbian sex. Very little dialogue (which is in Russian, probably, and you don't need subtitles because who cares what they are saying, it's the sex and naked bodies that matter). And if you really care about the dialogue, they sometimes have subtitles in English.
All in all: mainly attractive teens, with some real beauties, and they put on a show worth watching.
I'm giving the site a score of 92, because the site is good, and it comes with network access.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network (network changed its name from PornDoePremium around December 2018).
Currently you get access to 17 channels/sites. Each site is called a channel, which seems to be the current methodology for naming sites.
-There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. You get full access to all the channels of the network.
-Videos start off with a "skip intro" link, if you want to skip the ad/promo section that starts each video, and get to the start of the real video.
-Usually, the videography is first class: everything is well-lighted, images are clear and crisp, etc.
But sometimes they try for an artistic visual approach, and the action can be amateurish. Especially when the model is shown dancing around a room to show happiness or joy, the videography turns amateurish, because the video cuts to her waist, top of her legs, her head, it's supposed to be a vision of joy or pleasure, but it comes across as a piece of crap.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor. I consider the network a class act, because of the high quality of the content: the clear, crisp videos, the lovely models. The White Box channel is the crown jewel of the netork, and elevates the status of the entire network to premium quality. So why bring the network down by the ads, or by using a captcha?
Cross-sale ads are a regular feature for porn sites. Always trying to increase profits.
Captchas are supposed to increase site security, from robot attacks. But I'm guessing that most people who pay for porn sites do not appreciate the cross-sale ads, or the captchas that sometimes keep a paying member out of the site.
-There is no posting date for the videos. So figuring out how often a channel/site updates is a problem.
-Normally, to enter the members' area, you have to accept or decline the latest cross-sell offer to some other porn site.
-There is a strip of cross-sells at the bottom of each member page.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The ads are easy to ignore. But you paid to join the site, so why do they keep shoving ads at you? Greed, I guess.
-Cross-sell on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-There is a monthly limit of 100 downloads. Which means if you want to download the entire network, you will need a multi-month membership.
-The network recently dropped the number of channels from over 40 sites to the current 17. But the visual quality of most of their sites, and the beauty of their top models, make the network a definite worthwhile join. A few of the videos at The White Boxxx showcase the lovely models in extraordinary fashion, and those videos by themselves are worth the membership price to the network.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
A Girl Knows is a channel in the LetsDoeIt network.
Channel currently has 145 videos.
The network has 1373 videos.
Main strengths of the channel/site:
High production values.
Selection of models: many of the models are pretty to lovely.
Lesbian site.
Clear, crisp images and videos.
Beautiful girls, with lots of sensual kissing,licking, fingering.
A lot of European models, so when the girls speak English, there are strong accents, which can be intriguing.
Some of the models have large or even huge breasts, which are probably implants.
But many of the models are fucking gorgeous: Lena Reif, Maria Rya, Emily Cutie, Anie Darling, Anny Swix, Alecia Fox, Stacy Cruz, Rebecca Volpett, etc.
I've said that The White Boxxx is the jewel of the network. There are other sites in the network that are worth visiting. And some of the models are outstanding. Lovely models are featured at many porn sites, especially the glamour sites, but when those models appear at The White Boxxx, they can be fucking glorious. The White Boxxx took the idea of sensuous glamcore sex and made it an artform.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is the network did a recent update, where they made the search cover the entire network, instead of just the site you joined through. This made finding and accessing the content of each model much easier.
-Teen Sex Mania is part of the Teen Mega World nework (TMW), one of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
-Membership in any one of the satellite sites in the network gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites requiring extra payment. So you get access to 33 sites currently.
-Site averages 1 new video per month. However, the network averages 3 new videos every 4 days.
-Apparently, you can log in to any site in the network directly, with your login details, not just the site you joined through. However, since you can log in to your join site, and then transfer to any site in the network through the switching method, this is just an added convenience.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Sometimes you can find a secure version of the network (https), and sometimes you will find the non-secure version (http). They should delete the non-secure version, since that version is open for hacking.
Note: It's been a while since I've seen the https version of the network. The only https version I've seen recently, is for the join page. So maybe they dropped the https version, which would be a mistake, because many porn sites are converting to a secure version instead of a non-secure version.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The network has 33 sites. Most of them are archive sites that do not update. There are about 10 sites that update on an irregular basis.
-Vendo is the default biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've been a member through Vendo many times, and never had a problem.
Bottom Line:
The site and network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore porn: the sets were cheap, the girls wore cheap street clothes, the videos were just a guy and girl fucking with no preliminaries except maybe 1 or 2 kisses. The video definitions ran from about 360 to 720p.
Over time, as the network made money, they invested the money into upgrading the content:
the sets became cleaner, with nicer furniture and better lighting, better camera-work, higher definition (1080p in 2014, 2160p in 2016).
They also added a virtual reality site in 2016.
But even at the start, they were smart enough, or lucky enough, to focus on the models they used: the girls were real teens, and ranged from nice-looking to attractive to very attractive. The models are not cheap sluts, but attractive teens who seem to really enjoy getting into sex: female masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, boy-girl-girl, 2 boys on one girl.
That is one of the main strengths of the site and the network: how attractive the models are.
Another main strength is how they really seem to enjoy getting fucked.
Not much effort is put into making the models glamorous or good-looking: but since they are young and naturally attractive, it doesn't matter: these are mainly good looking teens: and some of them are even beautiful.
The girls are natural: almost no implants.
Out of over 2,000 models (I haven't examined every single one, but I've looked at most of them), I've only seen a few models with plastic/silicone boobs. The tip off is extra-large boobs that barely jiggle when the model moves.
Many of the models either appear in glamor sites like MetArt or could easily appear there due based on their appearance, which is as good or better than the average-looking model a MetArt:
A few examples would be:
Adel Bye, Autilia, Benta, Candy Red, Clarice, Diana B, Evelina Darling, Grace C, Heather Dew, Katelyn, Karoll, Latoya, Lolly, Lolly Small, Sheri Vi, Tetti Dew Korti, Aza, Kortny, Svetlana C, Witta.
The list could go on and on.
What I mean is, there are so many cute and adorable girls at this site, and network, that
the catalog of models compares, in my mind, to any glamor site, including MetArt and MPL Studios, who have some of the finest teen models in the world.
The Teen Mega World models don't have the make-up and other attentions that try to make them glamourous: but they are so naturally attractive, that you can't help wishing you were the stunt cock pleasuring them.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 92. This is because not only is the site a source of many fine videos, but you also get network access to over 5,000 hardcore teen videos.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the finest glamcore sites in the internet. The site makes an artform of presenting attractive models in appealing erotic visions.
When an attractive model appears in a The White Boxxx video, she will almost certainly look far more attractive than when she appears at any other porn site, including competing glamcore sites. It's a result of good-looking models, lighting, make-up, camera-work, etc., but these models are a vision of loveliness (in spite of the hardcore nature of the videos).
Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember.
That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network.
-The network mainly features attractive European models, but there are American models as well.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a hot link at the start of each video that allows you to skip the intro part (that is basically an advertisement for the site).
-I recommend watching the videos on a large screen monitor, instead of your laptop: (On a laptop, you might start drooling over the models and get drool over the keyboard or monitor. These models are that gorgeous).
-Login and member pages are secure: https.
-Download choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Streaming choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-PU offers a first month discount of $19.95.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
-The White Box videos present attractive models at their most attractive. The videos are a visual feast, probably the best glamcore internet site available.
-The network dropped the number of sites you have access to: until recently, you had access to over 40 sites. But currently you only get 17 sites. The sites they dropped now require additional fees to access.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although watching these gorgeous models making sensuous love is great, sometimes you wish for a harder edge, to take you over the top. The network has a site for rough sex, called Her Limit, but that is for fans of brutal fucking that is the polar opposite of glamcore.
-There is a download limit of 100 movies per month.
I don't download very much, so I've never encountered a download limit at the site or network.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
There are plenty of glamcore sites on the internet. But I think The White Boxxx is probably the finest of them. The site features lovely models in sensuous videos with high production values: the sets and lighting are expensive and the models are drop-dead gorgeous.
The sex is basically sensuous lovemaking. It can be a straight couple, a lesbian couple, 2 girls and a guy. The sex is heartcore, not raunchy. Filmed with high production values.
Watching a video is the same as watching a commercial-grade film that focuses on sex with a beautiful woman. X-Art, years ago, started making some excellent sensual videos of lovely women, but the quality of the videos at X-Art, in recent years, seems to have dropped off: maybe it's a lack of creative vision, or they are going for a harder edge.
But The White Boxxx took the idea a sensuous glamcore sex and made it an artform.
There is a slow buildup, with stroking, kissing, pleasuring their partners.
There are currently 210 HD glamour porn videos at the site.
The site updates, but I can't find a posting date for any of the videos, so I don't know how often the updates come.
But since you also get access to the other 16 sites in the network, there is more than enough quality material to keep you busy for more than a month's membership.
My favorte sites in the network include:
The White Boxxx, Bitches Abroad, A Girl Knows, Xchimera.
Giving the site and network access a score of 92.
If more of the sites updated frequently, the score would be even higher.
But for high-quality glamcore, The White Boxxx is the best site available.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is they did a recent network update that made using the site and network much easier. A few years ago, they did a network update that made searching and accessing the contents of a model a massive task: the search was limited to the site you joined through: even when you logged in to one of the other sites in the network, your search was still limited to your join site: so you would not be able to know or find the content of a model, except at your join site: also, even if you were able to use other search methods to learn the model had content at other sites in the network, accessing that content was a miserable, time-consuming task, because you would have to log in to that specific site, then page through the video listings to find her specific content at that site.
The best solution, under the previous join-site-specific-search, was to join through the Teen Mega World site, where your search covered the entire network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But now, Teen Mega World (TMW), and the satellite sites, have apparently done a new network update, that simplifies the search, so that the search for each site covers the entire network, and not only brings up the model's content at the network, but also brings up hot links so you can access her content at the entire network, without having to log in to each site where her content is listed.
This is a massive improvement on making the site and network easier to use:
-Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World (TMW) network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites requiring extra payment to access.
-There are over 30 sites in the network, covering many niches. This is a teen-focused network.
-Network updates daily.
-Network has over 5,000 videos.
-Network has over 2,000 models.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
Cons are basically minor.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Since the last network upgrade when they fixed the search engine from a limited search to your join site, to a general network search, the search and navigation has been greatly improved.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The network focuses on teens. If you want older models, you should look elsewhere.
-Almost all the teen models are from Eastern Europe (around Russia). So a lot of the dialog is in Russian. But what they're saying doesn't matter a lot, it's the action that counts. Do you care if they are saying "Hi, let's fuck." Or, "OOOhhhh, good fucking."
I doubt conversations mean much anyway. These videos are focused on teens fucking and getting fucked. Or maybe masturbating.
-The network used to be low-grade hardcore teen sex, with little money spent on the videos: the models wore cheap streat clothes, the scenes were shot in cheap rooms, with cheap furniture, low-quality video equipment. But over time, they invested the profits into upgrading the network quality: the sets are more expensive, the models, while not a lot of attention is put into making them attractive, are young teens who are naturally attractive, the lighting and video equipment was upgraded. So even though the network is not glam or heartcore, it's now has a lot of videos of fine quality: they even have 4K videos and Virtual Reality videos.
-The network has both a secure (https) and non-secure (http) version.
This is the first time I've ever seen a site or network offering both.
It seems like a waste of bandwith to offer a non-secure version, if there is a secure version.
My browser uses a popup when I start to enter my login details in the non-secure version:
"This version is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
Why not switch to a secure version, that is less likely to be hacked?
-Also, it used to be easier to enter the htpps version of the sites, but currently, even when I can find an https version of one of the sites, when I hit the login link, it switches to the non-secure version, where my login details are not hidden, and the member pages I visit will be recorded by my ISP.
-One video update per month. But the network has a daily update. So there is always something new, as well a ton of older material, much of which is worth viewing.
-Sometimes there are glitches in the navigation: You can't find the https version of the site or network. Or you login to a site, and click through the video pages, except, when you examine the video thumbnail, it shows you are looking at thumbnails from a different site than what you're logged into. So how can you count the number of videos the site has, or look over the earliest videos of the site, since the video thumbnail pages are not separated as they should be?
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
This network is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
You have over 2,000 models, many of them attractive, that are willing and able to demonstrate an appetite for sex.
The fact that many of the models speak in Russian or some slavic language is unimportant.
The action is what counts. And these girls usually put on a great show.
My other favorite teen hardcore network is what used to be called the Diesel Access network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). Those models are among the prettiest and most beautiful models on the internet. And a lot of the girls are also into sex, with boys, or with each other if a boy is not around, or with themselves if they happen to be alone.
For a lover of teen sex, you can't get better than the Teen Mega World and Diesel Access networks. (Except, Diesel Access dropped the name, and positioned the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites as separate from the All Fine Girls site, except that all 3 sites are currently marketed so when you join any one of the three sites, you get access to all 3 sites. Which doesn't make a lot of sense, but maybe it's a business thing with the details of what's happening behind the scenes that would make sense why the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites are being held separate from the All Fine Girls site.
I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 92.
If you're into hardcore teen porn, this is one of the finest networks around.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network (in late 2018 PornDoePremium changed its name to LetsDoeIt).
LetsDoeIt is mainly a glamcore network of European models.
-Her Limit is different from the rest of the network sites, which mainly feature glamcore/heartcore with European models. Her Limit features attractive European models in rough sex. This is a pro and a con, depending on your personal tastes. Personally, I find the glamcore/heartcore niche more enjoyable than BDSM.
-Although this is consensual sex, and the intro portion shows the model smiling and happy to perform, once the sex begins, it turns rough quickly.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, the site features high production values: lovely models, nice sets, excellent lighting and sound control.
-You get access to over 40 different channels. There are no premium channels requiring extra payment.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 82 videos
-Many of the scenes are shot with 2 main stunt cocks: Mike Angelo or Mike Chapman. It gets boring for me to see these guys slapping and abusing the good-looking models, but that's just me: if you are into bdsm, maybe you can cheer or get excited by the way the stunt cocks use rough sex on the models.
-Site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. But the network updates every other day.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is rough sex.
Shows how powerful men can be: dominating the lovely bitches with their proud cock, shoving into the model's mouth until she gags, slapping her like the bitch deserves, pounding her pussy and asshole until she begs for mercy, with her whimpering and moans.
Choking the model by her throat.
Spitting on the model.
You get the idea.
The site is for men who want to be real men, unlike the pussy-men you find at most sites that strive to please the woman with soft, gentle sex.
Pierre Woodman would probably be a good stunt cock for some of these videos.
Since he seems to get off on rough sex and abusing women.
Hard to figure what kind of score to give the site.
If you're into rough sex, this would be a wonderful site, deserving a score in the 90s.
Even if you're not into rough sex, since you get access to the rest of the network, which includes The White Boxxx, one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network deserves a score in the 90s, as well.
So I'm giving the site a score of 92.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day.
-Video and photoset quality is outstanding.
-The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed.
-In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on,
or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc.
One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex.
-Content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
-Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor.
Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site.
-Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network.
-You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page.
-Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets.
-They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of films: 2,123
Number of galleries: 3,322
Number of models: 1,095
Number of contributing photographers: 36
Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network.
-Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now.
The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult.
All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets.
Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for.
Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions.
You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc.
You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site.
Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed.
Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is a softcore site. No hardcore action that I can find. That is a pro or a con, depending on your preferences.
-The site features some of the most gorgeous models in the world. However, there are many porn sites, both softcore and hardcore, that also feature many of the most gorgeous models in the world. So what was, pre-internet, very limited access to beautiful naked models, is now basically unlimited access to beautiful naked models, of all ages (18+) through the various internet porn sites.
-The site content is exclusive. This includes the photo sets and the videos.
-Navigation is simple. You have a limited number of models, and each model has both photo sets and videos. So the site is easy to navigate, unlike a megasite like Adult Time.
-You can favorite the models.
-There is a bio sheet for each model, which lists the basic physical facts and a tiny bio.
-Your choice of billing processor. I used Segpay, which appears to be the default processor.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The site also uses Vendo, Epoch, Segpay, 2000Charge, Centrobill, WTS or PayGarden.
Note: I did a charge-back with a Vendo membership several months ago, because I didn't recognize the charge. I contacted Vendo, and tried to have the charge get re-processed, but Vendo said they take charge-backs seriously, so they refused to allow me to to subscribe to that site through Vendo. Vendo also blackballed me, and when another site that I had a membership in for years was suposed to renew, Vendo cancelled the membership, instead of processing the payment. I called the credit card company that was supposed to fund the recurring membership, and they told me they did not decline the membership fee, but, that no payment request was made. I also have another membership through Vendo that is supposed to renew this month, December, and that will also be cancelled for non-payment by Vendo.
It's not the end of the world, because I have too many porn memberships, anyway.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So Vendo is saving me money.
Even though I have had many memberships through Vendo over the years, and never had a problem with them, until the single charge-back a few months ago.
CONS(START OF):
-An expensive site. You only get access to this one site, with no bonus sites that I'm aware of.
The PU discount is $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. Or $99.95/year (recurring).
And the listed site membership prices are often higher.
-You only get 25 monthly downloads. But you're supposed to get unlimited streaming.
I believe the 25 monthly download applies only to the videos. My guess is that you are allowed unlimited downloads of the photo sets, but if I find out differently, I will update this review.
-There were 2 pre-checked cross-sales on the join page. Both cross-sales turn into expensive memberships after the 3-day trial.
-The file name for the photo set and the video does not include the name of the model, or the date posted. A sample photo set zip file default name is: 12994-gallery.zip.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The models are gorgeous. Mainly Eastern European (from Russia and Ukraine). Mainly white. This is a glamcore porn site: by that, I mean it's softcore porn, where you get models in glamorous costumes, but strictly softcore action. This is a girly site, no men allowed, from what I can tell. Little to no overt sex. The model might touch her own body, but if there is masturbation allowed, I haven't found it yet (this is only my first month here, so I've only seen a small fraction of the site content.
The videos are artistic, beautifully filmed, to showcase the attractiveness of the models. There is background music to the videos, which is best played at low volume or muted.
I don't know why, but the photo sets at Superbe appeal to me much more than the photo sets at Hegre.
Hegre is a softcore/hardcore site which emphasizes glamcore photos, but also has softcore or midcore videos as well.
So the Hegre site has masturbation and some male/female action.
But the Hegre photos seem sterile to me. Even though the Hegre models are uniformly attractive or beautiful, the sets lack any heat or passion. While the Superbe photosets, although entirely softcore, can be extremely erotic.
Hegre sometimes has a habit of cutting the model's face out of the photos, which I find annoying. Hegre uses attractive girls, yet he cuts out the model's face, and focuses on other parts of the model's body. Maybe it's a fetish thing with him.
Superbe started around December 2020, so it's still a new site. The videos are offered in 240p through 1080p definition.
The photo sets are only offered in one definition zip file.
If you are into softcore nudity of lovely young models in their late teens and early twenties, I definitely think Superbe is worth a visit.
Normally the membership price is overly expensive, but they have holiday sales where the pricing comes down.
Currently you can join for one month for $9.95, which I think is a cheap price to explore which of these lovely models you can make your current favorites.
The main negative about the site is that you are limited to 25 video downloads per month. But I believe there is unlimited downloads for the photo sets, as well as unlimited streaming.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because you get weekly updates, as well as a nice backlog of photo sets + videos for many of the models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantasy Massage is a good massage-themed network.
-The massage theme is one of my favorite themes in porn.
-The site has a large amount of content, over 2,336 videos.
-The technical qualities are first-rate. Nice sets, excellent lighting, good flesh tones, attractive models.
-Unlimited streaming.
-The daily download limit is 3 GB, which is a massive amount of downloads, and shouldn't affect most people.
-Videos are offered in 288p thru 2160p, for streaming and downloads.
-Videos have a trailer, so you can watch the trailer for a quick preview of the video.
-You can favorite your best videos and your favorite models.
-You can watch the videos in 0.5x, 1x, 2x, or 4x speed.
Cons:
-The main con is that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network.
The Adult Time network is a huge network that has over 200 channels or sites, and many of the channels have hundreds of videos, so navigation can be difficult. That is a plus and minus. You have massive content, much of which is good to great, but there's so much content that finding what you want to watch can be frustrating.
-Downloads are offered with a 1-year membership. The monthly membership does not include downloads, but if you contact customer support, they might include downloads with a monthly membership, for no extra charge, or, if you're a good talker, a lower monthly charge and free downloads.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
Bottom Line:
Number of Fantasy Massage videos: 2336
Those videos are separated/classfied under different channels, as Family Sex Massage, Nuru Massage, Massage Parlor, POV Massage.
Reasons why the massage theme is popular and is one of my favorite themes:
The setup is simple, straight-forward, easy to see and understand. Requires little acting on the part of the performers, which is a plus because most porn starlets have minimal acting ability. You get a girl laying down on a massage table, she is massaged and caressed until she is aroused, and then she is fucked. So that setup is more believable than porn plots which require more acting.
Many of the models are attractive to very attractive: Peachy, Caroline G, Stacey Lewis, Edita, Nora, the list goes on and on. These Russia models are young, slender, white girls, mainly from Russian areas.
So you have videos that are easy to watch, with good to excellent technical features, and attractive young models, who usually put on a show that is worth watching.
I'm not a fan of the Nuru massage videos. That's just me. I think they are trying to put some plot into the video, which strikes me as stupid plot, and exposes the poor acting ability of the stunt cock and the model. I much prefer a simpler plot of the girl coming into a room, undressing, and getting a massage and then getting fucked. Easier to believe, easier to watch, without as much boring dialogue and fake acting. The best template for the massage video would be Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network), or Rub A Teen (a clone of the Tricky Masseur site which is part of the Team Skeet network), where the plot is as I described: Girl enters the room, disrobes, gets on a massage table, a stunt cock rubs her down, she gets aroused, and they fuck.
I'm giving Fantasy Massage a score of 90. Because you have thousands of hardcore videos in the site/network, plus over 57,000 additional videos in the rest of the Adult Time network you have access to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating. Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models. Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one site gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems huge to me. Limits are not a pro, normally. But only a purist is going to complain about a daily limit of 300 GB.
-Content is exclusive.
-You get your choice of multiple definitions for streaming and/or downloading videos. Also, videos will give you multiple bit rates. Seems like over-kill to me, with multiple bit rates, but maybe people with high-end equipment can appreciate the choices.
-The photosets to illustrate the video are not simple screenshots of the video, but real photos. And the photosets offer a different version of the video. It's not a copy of the video, but the same scene from a different perspective. Very unusual. Actually, this is the only network I've seen this at. It's like they did the scene in a rehearsal,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
with the models allowed to improvise. So the photoset is related to the video, but the action/plot varies from the video.
-I find some of the interviews interesting. It can give you a hint of what the model is like.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are minor. This a good site. Not all the sites are fine, you have some clunkers, but overall, this is a fine network.
-You see a video you like, but don't know what site in the network it belongs to. Most videos are watermarked with the "New Sensations" logo, not with the site. And there is no text description that indicates what site the video/photoset belongs to.
Not a problem, except if you're trying to write a review for the site the video belong to.
The HotWifeXXX videos do have the HOTWIFEXXX.COM logo in their videos.
FamilyXXX videos also have that logo in their videos.
The Lesbian Experience videos have that logo in their videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The number of sites keeps changing. At one time they used to advertise around 20 separate sites, but currently, there are maybe 12 sites, with other videos being lumped into what are called series or DVD.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Tabu Tales focuses on sinful sex. Which is basically meaningless in today's porn: almost all sex is considered taboo, unless you're married and fucking your wife in the missionary position. And even then, if you're filming it, that would be a sin. Or if someone else is watching. Or if one of the partners is having dirty thoughts during sex, that would be sinful.
The tabu sex featured at the site is sex between step relatives.
-The site and network are excellent. The contents have improved over time, the models are picked to be attractive, the plots usually make sense, the acting is better than at many porn sites. The video quality is good to excellent: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control. Some of the videos can be really hot. And most of them are enjoyable.
I realize personal taste can vary widely. I just went to a Mexican restaurant yesterday, my neighbors told me (husband, wife, older daughter) the restaurant was great. I ate there, thought the restaurant was shit, the pinto beans were hard, the cheese enchiladas were lousy-a tortilla wrapped around some melted cheese that was cold. I realize that opinions can vary widely, but I was really disappointed with the restaurant.
But I enjoy the New Sensations network. I've found some videos that I really enjoy. And found plenty of others that are worth watching. The New Sensations models are attractive. There are other sites with models that are even more attractive, but the New Sensations models are fine. And some of their videos are hot.
Also, the nice-sized thumbnails used to illustrate the individual videos are bright and showcase the models attractively. Some of the thumbnails are jpegs, that if you hover your mouse over the thumbnail, it gives you a brief clip of the model in action.
I enjoy looking at some of these models. Many of the models are attractive, but some just seem to have extra appeal. Again, personal tastes vary, but some models are just fucking appealing. You need a plot that fits your tastes, a model that you find really attractive, but the combination makes a video and site worth joining.
Bottom line:
Tabu Tales is not the best site in the New Sensations network. The premise of the plots are not as strong as in some sites, the level of attractiveness of the models is not as high. But since you paid for your membership, scan the site to see which videos appeal to you.
The site stopped updating years ago. Which was a good thing, because that allowed them to focus on providing content to other network sites. The network offers straight and lesbian sex, some interracial sex, gangbang porn, taboo porn, and other niches.
Some early content is only available in SD definition. And early videos have a photoset made of screencaps instead of real photos. But that shows the network has been improving steadily over the years, and has been offering 4K format over the last few years.
Every so often New Sensations offers a $60/year price, which is a substantial discount from the PU discounted price of $95.40/year or $119.95/year.
The monthly, multi-month, and yearly membership options come with full streaming and downloading privileges. I believe the 3 day trial for $4.95 might be a limited trial. I'm not sure, since I've never used it. I always went for a yearly membership for $60/year.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
