Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is one of the New Sensations sites. Membership in any one of the New Sensations sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-I like the selection of models at the site and network. Obviously I don't like all of them, but there are some that are really appealing. Personal preferences play a large part in what each person enjoys, but the models and some of the stories are very enjoyable.
-The videos (and the photosets) are professionally shot. Nice sets, good lighting and focus, good colors, good sound control.
-Content is exclusive.
-The site (and network) features interviews with the models. Many people think the interviews are boring and a waste of space, but I like to listen to them, especially the interviews with models that I like: it gives you added information about the models. It can also give you an insight in how these people think, which is rare: mostly, you get canned speeches that don't tell you much of anything
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
except how well they can speak into a camera.
-A lot of the models at the site (and network) are early into their porn career. Actually, many models seem to have a porn career of 3 to 4 years or less. So maybe I'm stating the obvious.
-Years ago there was a sameness to many of the videos. But the quality and variety of the plots and other technical factors have improved over time, and I think the network is more of a bargain than it used to be, because the content is more appealing. Especially if you can join with a discounted price during a holiday special.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is the site is no longer updating. A shame, because this is one of the better sites in the network. I like the idea of romance between two people, it gives meaning to the sex. Especially if it's done well. And the site (and most of the network) does use writers that can create simple plots that add value to the videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Many of the models can act well enough that the videos aren't ridiculous or cringe-worthy.
-Other than the main con that there are no updates, I think most other complaints are minor.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB. Which is trivial, for most people.
-Videos have a watermark which shows "New Sensations", which is the network, not the site name. So the only way to know a video belongs to the site is when you click on the Romance hot link and search through those videos. You can't tell from the video itself that a video belongs to the site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I think the content at the New Sensations network has improved over the years. It's much more appealing. The stories or plots are more believable than the plots at many porn sites, which is refreshing. The acting by the models is more believable, partly based on better plots, but also by the models trying to act better instead of trying to act stupid.
The New Sensations Romance site stopped updating years ago. On 2018-10-13 they posted the "Welcome to my World" video starring Kenna James, which was the last update.
Whether you call Romance a site or a series at the New Sensations network can be elastic.
On some pages at New Sensations, it's listed as a site.
On some other pages at New Sensations, it's listed as a series.
The Romance videos are actually taken from DVDs, that the New Sensations owner/operator/studio/whatever-you-call-it people put out.
The site and network are user-friendly.
You get a short text description of the video, that is accurate and tells you what the video is about. Good tags that help you if you like searching a site or network.
You get multiples choices in streaming and downloads for definition and bit rate.
You get a listing of the porn stars in the video/photoset.
You get good quality (or what I consider high quality) videos of attractive young models who put on a good sex show. The sex is basically bread-and-butter, not over-the-top calisthenics.
Prime young flesh on view, nice scripts with a bit of romance and meaning, fine visuals, nice sets, gives you a quality product.
For a low membership price, I think the site (and network) is a bargain if you can join for $60/year during a holiday special. The regular price, with a PU discount, is $95.40/year.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lez Cuties is an educational site. It teaches you that no matter how cute a girl might be, no matter how young they are, you have to determine if they have lez tendencies before you get involved with them. Otherwise, if they turn out to be lezzies, you can get your heart broken.
However, if you're broad-minded, and don't mind sharing, you can get two or more cuties in your bed for the price of one. (Ha-ha. Get the joke: broad-minded.)
-The site title is appropriate. Most of the models are young and attractive: Lizzi Vogue (aka Lizi Vogue, Liz Vogue, Vika K, Pola, Kristin A, Wendy), Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, Geisha Kyd, etc. The list goes on and on. You need a porn site encyclopedia to keep track of the names these porn stars are known by, as well as the sites they appear at.
-As a site included in Adult Time, you get all the bells and whistles the network offers: Multiple definitions for streaming. Multiple definitions for downloads.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Read a review about the Adult Time network to get a full list of the many advantages of an Adult Time membership.
-The technical features of the videos are first rate: crystal clear videos, excellent lighting, good colors and sound control, expensive sets.
-Although many or most of the models are European, the videos are mainly in English.
-The site updates with 2 new videos per month. And if you want more lez content, there are plenty more lez sites in the Adult Time network, as well as lez content mixed in with the straight content in non-lez sites.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot. And there are tags that also define the video action. So you get a good idea of the plot (what little there is of a plot) from the text description and the tags.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are minor. Adult Time is probably the best bargain in paid porn today. You get a wide variety of niches, with over 55,000 hardcore videos of good quality, for a low price.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a one-year membership. The normal monthly membership is streaming only. But exotics4me has written that if you contact customer service, they might offer you a monthly membership with streaming and downloading privileges, at a reduced price.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Navigation could be improved. The network has so much content, it's hard to get a listing of the content for each site. You need time and patience to find the content that fits your tastes.
-It's easy to get distracted while searching the content. Too many good looking models, too many sites that might appeal to you, get in the way of searching any one site. Maybe I'm weak minded, but I get distracted easily.
-The model page for a model has links to her videos at the network, but no bio or other information on the model.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Lez Cuties is part of 21 Naturals, which is part of 21 Sextury, which is part of Adult Time. So you get access to the entire Adult Time network.
The site title is apt: the models are almost all young, cute girls.
They do throw in some older models for variety of age and plot. But the older models are also attractive.
The site has 518 videos.
"Till Next Time", a Lez Cuties video posted 2022-03-24, features Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd. Geisha Kyd has a boyfriend. You can tell right off the bat that Alexa Flexy and Bonnie Dolce are dyed-in-the-wool lesbians, because they are kissing each other a lot.
When Geisha Kyd drops by their house, bringing a new boyfriend, Alexa and Bonnie make them welcome. However, Geisha and Bonnie start kissing, right in front of the boyfriend, who smiles with embarrasment. Then Geisha says to her boyfriend that she's sorry, but it will have to be another time. And the boyfriend leaves.
This is why I said that before you get involved with a lez, make sure she will invite you to participate in any parties with her girlfriends. The guy is probably forced to masturbate by himself while the three girls are having sex.
Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd are 3 really cute young girls. And they're really into each other. Bonnie doesn't want the boyfriend joining in, it's strictly girly sex today.
The boyfriend could have made the sex more interesting, if he was the take-charge type of guy.
But he's a wimp, who disappears when Geisha tells him to leave. And the 3 girls start making out.
So lots of kissing, caressing, pussy licking, finger-fucking,
Good, clean fun.
The three models are absolutely adorable.
Very pretty faces, great bodies.
And the sex is slow, gentle, the noises the models make are soft, not over-the-top, which is more realistic than fake screaming because someone is touching their breast or pussy.
So this is a fine to very fine scene.
Any quibbles about the video? Alexa Flexy has medium sized breasts. But they are so firm, even when they are being kissed, they don't move naturally. They're probably implants. I mean breast tissue is mainly fat, not muscle, so medium or large breasts, if natural, will jiggle. Flexy's breasts don't jiggle: they are not overly large, and her breasts are nice-looking, but I'm not a fan of breast implants. That's my personal preference. Many people enjoy medium or large breasts, and don't mind implants.
However, I discovered why they didn't need Geisha's boyfriend. During the sex, Alexa grabs a large plastic dildo, and uses it on Bonny's pussy. The boyfriend didn't have a cock as large as the dildo. The dildo might be plastic, instead of warm flesh, but these lezzies know how to use a dildo better than the wimpy boyfriend could use his cock. And then Geisha uses a tiny vibrator to use on Bonny while Bonny's pussy is getting fucked by Alexa. So the moans and groans get louder.
If you have an alpha male, like James Deen, who could take charge and use these women, then the women would probably have gone along with Deen. But the boyfriend was, apparently, a mild guy who put up no fuss when he was dismissed.
The moral of the story is: if you find your girlfriend is a carpet muncher, make sure she knows you're the boss man, and that you will be included in any flings she might have.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Access to the Adult Time network makes joining this site a winning proposition. Adult Time has a huge number of really fine videos. The problem is finding the ones that will appeal to you. So you need time and patience to slog through the content, but there are, in addition to the good videos, some really fine videos that will make you glad you joined the network. And the Lez Cuties site has some very attractive models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many videos from the last few years are available for streaming and downloads in 288p through 4K.
-A large lesbian massage site. One of many lesbian sites in the Adult Time network. There are also many lesbian videos scattered throughout the other channels in Adult Time. Lesbian sex is a popular niche.
-Part of the Adult Time network. Over 300 channels to choose from, covering a wide variety of niches. Over 55,000 hardcore videos of good to excellent quality.
-Customer support is 24/7. With a live chat option that answers within a few minutes.
-Many videos have subtitles in different languages.
-The videos have excellent technical qualities: good to excellent camera-work, expensive sets, nice costumes, excellent lighting, good sound control.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There is a daily download limit of 3 GB, which is a huge amount of data.
-You can stream a video at your choice of speed: 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x. Seems like a gimmick to me.
-There is a text description of the video plot.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Sometimes they try to add different elements to the plot. Kenna James is step-sister to Carolina Sweets. Both are cute blondes. Who like each other. But the liking turns too intense, when they find out their parents marriage is falling apart. Also, Carolina Sweets confesses that she lost her virginity to Kenna James' brother, who is Carolina Sweets' step-brother. Guilt! Anguish. What are they supposed to do?
The two young women find comfort in each other's arms. Which turns to passion. Which is wonderful, exciting, except it's also incest.
Watching these videos shows you that although there is hope, there are also problems in the real world.
CONS(START OF):
-Photosets download with zip file with a generic name, such as "120092", which has to be changed to add whatever data you need to file it.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Photosets normally have 35 photos per set. Which seems very small, when you have lovely models in a video.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The simplest way to get download privileges is with a yearly membership. Many PU members want a monthly membership, which is normally streaming only. However, if you contact customer support, they might offer you a monthly membership with downloading privileges.
-It pays to wait for holiday specials, which offer nice discounts for your membership.
-One problem with an Adult Time membership is you're bombarded with thumbnails of absolutely scrumptious models, so you're trying to find a video in a particular channel, and you are distracted by a model from a different channel.
I'm looking at a thumbnail of Coco Lovelock at Adult Time:
-"Lost Little Lamb", a Pure Taboo video posted, 2022-04-07, features Coco Lovelock, a tiny, slender blonde with an angelic face. She's 4' 10", weighs 85 lbs. So you could scoop her up in your arms and do nasty things to her. Since she's a porn star, if you pay her enough, she'd probably be willing. She started in porn in 2019. Her DOB is 1999-06-10.
If you're a real fan, you can collect used panties and lingerie from Coco, as per her twitter account.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): All Girl Massage has 639 videos. Almost all have a matching photoset.
Photosets average 35+ photos per set.
Site focuses on girl-girl sex and massages.
With hundreds of videos, you get an A-list of porn stars, including Dillion Harper, Kristen Scott, Scarlett Sage, Elena Koshka, and hundreds more.
The plots are normally simple. A young woman getting a massage by another woman, which turns into a sexual encounter. Sometimes it's both women are young, sometimes it's young-older.
Sometimes it might be sex between step-relatives: either step-sisters, step-daughter and step-mother. Since step-relative sex is illegal in many jurisdictions, I don't know why they don't feature blood-relative sex in porn. But I assume that fake-incest is more legal than real-incest (blood incest). So the performers normally state or imply they are 18 years old (or older) and they are having sex with a step-relative, not a blood relative, in the video.
Real bottom line:
The All Girl Massage channel of Adult Time is a fine lesbian massage site.
Filmed in videos with good to excellent technical qualities: expensive sets, excellent camera-work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. Attractive models.
You also have access to the entire Adult Time network, one of the best bargains in porn today.
Some people complain that the site can become boring. But two factors to consider:
-Some people will always complain, no matter what.
-Too much content at a site will turn people off to the value of the site. That's human nature.
The site and network is not perfect. There's too much content to search it easily and find what appeals to you. And the photosets download with a generic filename, and have to be re-named. And the photosets are too small, only 35 photos per set.
But these are minor quibbles.
The All Girl Massage channel of Adult Time is a recommended join.
Especially if you wait for a holiday special, and join Adult Time at a reduced price.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network.
-The young girls are mainly attractive teens or 20s models. Coco Lovelock, Haley Spades, Athena Faris, Khloe Kapri, Laney Grey, Haley Reed, etc. The older women playing the step-mothers are also attractive: Sofie Marie, Silvia Saige, etc.
-All memberships have unlimited streaming. You can stream videos in 288p through 2160p (4K).
-If you have downloading privileges, you can download the videos in 160p through 2160p (4K).
-Videos have a photoset which is based on the video. There's a zip file for the photoset.
Cons:
-Adult Time has different types of memberships. Many short-term memberships are streaming only. The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly membership. Except many PU members don't want to get locked into a yearly membership.
-Navigation can be confusing. Two main reasons: a huge amount of content, over 55,000 hardcore videos. Plus, content covering many different niches. So you've got, in the main, lots of content at most sites (hundreds of videos), and hundreds of different sites, and it's hard to get a simple listing for most of the sites. So even though the massive content is a positive, it's also a negative because finding the content that appeals to you can be time-consuming. And not as easy as it would be if they laid out the content into separate sites more logically, that can be searched more easily.
-A common negative is that the models start moaning loudly and screaming loudly to show fake excitement.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Some noises, some moans and groans would add to the excitement, if they are believable, but at Mommy's Girl, it's too fake, and takes away from the scene.
-With so much content, it's easy to start complaining about the quality of the content. That's human nature. Most of the content is good to excellent quality, in technical terms. But people will complain that the content is bland or repetitive or lacking freshness. Personally, I think there's a huge amount of content that I don't appreciate, but there's also a lot of content that I find appealing. Which is a navigation problem.
-A fairer complaint that people have with the site and network is variable download speeds. I don't see a lot of people complaining about streaming issues, but more people complain about download speeds which can vary a lot. Personally, I don't download very much, because I have a slow connection to my ISP, and it's not worth the hassle of wasting my time with downloads. But for people who want fast downloads, that is a valid issue, but they will have to live with what they get. There's no question but that Adult Time is a very popular network, and lots of people are streaming and downloading, which puts a strain on their servers.
-There's a model's page, but it only has links to the model's videos. No personal information.
-There's a 300 GB daily limit. Which seems huge to me, and should not be a problem for anyone who is not trying to download the entire network in a short time period.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Part of the Adult Time network. Adult Time advertises itself as the only porn site you'll ever need. I don't know how true that is, because I belong to many different porn sites, and I think many of them are worth joining.
However, if you are on a very limited budget, the Adult Time network gives you a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering many different niches.
Mommy's Girl features lesbian porn.
Specifically, old-young porn. Where a step-mother and her step-daughter are having sex. So it's part of the fake incest niche (or what I consider fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives, instead of real incest which would be sex between blood relatives).
-This is story-driven porn. The plots are supposed to be important. So the models get to demonstrate their acting chops. Except that many of these models can't act, and the plots and dialog are sophomoric, so you either turn off your brain, and try to focus on the physical attractiveness of the models, or ignore the plots and poor acting, and again, focus on the physical attractiveness of the models.
Adult Time network has other sites that either focus on lesbian action or feature lesbian action. Web Young, Girlsway, Girlfriends Films, Adam And Eve Pictures, 1111 Customs, Addicted2Girls, Teenage Lesbian, Sweetheart Video, etc.
With so many different sites featuring lesbian action, you should be able to find a lot of content that appeals to you, if you're into lesbian porn. At some Adult Time sites the plots are more believable, or the acting or sex is better.
I think that Mommy's Girl is a good addition to the Adult Time network.
The site gives you good lesbian porn with a plot.
The plots are often foolish.
The acting is not very good.
But the models are attractive.
And the technical qualities are good (good camera work, good lighting, nice sets, good sound control--except they moan and scream too much and too loud).
And you get access to the Adult Time network, which raises the score to 90.
Even if the Mommy's Girl site was poor, and it's not, access to the Adult Time network is worth 90 points by itself.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network.
-Many of the models used are young teens. Many of them are cute or attractive.
-Verotel is the default billing processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but when I had a problem once, Verotel was quick to respond and solve it.
-PU has a link to a discounted membership price of $60/year. Or $15 for the first month.
-Most videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p for streaming.
For the last few years, there is a 4K option for video downloads.
-There is photoset of each video, that can be streamed or downloaded.
Cons:
-The last update to the network was Feb 22, 2022. The last update to the site was Feb 11, 2022. Site updates are always slower than network updates, but it looks like the site and the network might have stopped updates.
Until recently, the site gave 2 or 3 updates per month. But it's been 44 days since the last site update. And 33 days since the last network update.
-Regular membership price to Dirty Flix is $120/year. But you can often find a holiday special for $60/year. PU has a link to the Kinky Family site for $60/year membership.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https" in front of the address bar, you get a secure login, less chance of being hacked. (A tip from PU member exotics4me)
-Ads on every member page. Again, standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are more like a set of screencaps. There is one definition for the zip file, and the photosets are not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The mechanism for playing a slideshow online is primitive. Much better to download the zip file and use your computer's program to play the slideshow. Except most photosets are low quality screen caps that are not worth viewing.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Kinky Family focuses on what I call fake incest: sex between step-relatives, which is one of the more popular niches in the last few years.
I don't know why people think sex between step-relatives is thrilling or perverted, but I guess that most people have a legal bent that wants to criminalize sex, because sex is dirty and illegal and let's make whoopee and fuck over as many people as we can. That's always a fun thing to do.
You sit on a curb and smoke a cigarette, and a guard or cop can accuse you of loitering.
And tell you to move on. That's true, even if it's still legal to smoke in that area.
The site has 144 movies.
All the movies feature late teen, early 20s models.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
The plots are girls fucking with their step-brothers, or their step-fathers. The plots are thin, but the girls are attractive. So who cares if the dialog might be trite, the situations unrealistic. These girls are fucking attractive.
You watch these videos, and your body responds.
Kamryn Jayde, Ellie Idol, Paris White, etc.
Ellie Eilish is named "Ellie Idol" at this site, and her age is given as 33 for the video posted Feb 10, 2020.
My guess is that Ellie Eilish is being confused with some other model.
The video was posted Feb 10, 2020, when Ellie Eilish was 18 or 19.
Ellie Eilish is an American model/porn actress, who first appeared in porn in Nov 2019 at FTVgirls.com, and has since appeared at over 25 other sites.
A cute girl, slender, white, expressive face, puts on a great show. She's one of the better actresses in porn. No matter how stupid the plot or dialog, she comes across as a young teen with issues, and you believe her, she establishes an instant connection, you feel for her, and God, you wish it was you pounding away on that slim, tender young body.
Porn is fantasy. And she draws you into that fantasy.
I'm saying the videos are good to great. That's not because of the stupid plots. But the models are young and attractive. The video style is fake reality porn, but it works. Because you focus on the girls. And their bodies. And the videos can make you horny. Which is the purpose of porn.
Bottom line: This is a large site. 144 movies. It's not updating currently. So that's a negative. And the stupid plots are a negative. But the girls are attractive, and the sex is what I call bread-and-butter, which means you get a mixture of pussy licking, cock sucking, vaginal sex. The taboo of fake-incest is supposed to add heat to the scenes. Step-brother fucking his step-sister, step-father fucking his step-daughter.
So if you are into teen porn, and can ignore the stupid plots, this site (and network) is a worthwhile join.
The $60/year membership price is a bonus.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network.
-You get absolutely beautiful photography.
-You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models.
-You get unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Downloads are offered in multiple definitions.
-A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models.
Cons:
-The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor.
-Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites.
There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18.
But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you.
And most of the models, like I say, are really cute.
Bottom Line:
Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons:
Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site.
But basically,
-Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet.
-Over 23,000 photo sets.
-Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.)
-The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back.
-The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart.
So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous.
And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be.
Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable.
Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates.
Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away.
But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content.
So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18.
Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: if you join Heavy Handfuls directly, you pay a high price.
$119.95/year, or $29.95/month.
Joining NewSensations.com directly, you pay $95/year, or $29.95/month.
I'd wait for a holiday special, when prices often drop to $60/year, or a lower monthly fee if you don't want to join for a long term membership. That is for joining through New Sensations, which has a cheaper price than joining Heavy Handfuls, even though both memberships give you access to the same sites and same network.
-Part of the New Sensations network, with over 7,500 videos of good quality.
-Site features women with large breasts. Some of the breasts seem natural, others are obvious boob jobs.
-The sex videos at Heavy Handfuls give you slightly more plot than the average video at New Sensations, but that's not saying much. For example, a guy just broke up with his girlfriend, the stepmother offers sympathy, and then she's jumping on top of him on the couch, within the first three minutes of the video.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So one minute of sympathy, one minute of walking him to the couch, then, BAM!, she shoving her tongue down his mouth and pulling back to push her dress down to bare her huge breasts, while the guy is still gulping for air. But then he starts sucking her breasts, those huge, massive titties, and it's off to the races.
Who needs plot when the porn world gives you these true-to-life scripts?
If you're a breast fan, this site is for you.
-I don't think the New Sensations network, or this site, gives you a lot of bells and whistles in the technical department. But New Sensations gives the same layout to all the sites I've seen so far.
-You get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading.
-You get quality videos: mainly A-list models, attractive to very attractive, good colors and good lighting, nice sets,
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
a lot of sex. They try to vary the minimal plots, settings, models, costumes, for variety.
CONS(START OF):
-I don't think there are any serious cons.
-If you can get a cheap price for the network, I think you get your money's worth.
But join during a holiday special for $60/year. And join through the New Sensations network.
If you join through one of the included sites, your membership does not give you anything more than a regular New Sensations membership, but you might be charged a higher price.
-You get at least one pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, you might find a second pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. I uncheck them, for different reasons:
Most of the pre-checked cross-sales are for sites I don't need a trial member to.
All these short-term trial memberships, after 2 or 3 days, turn into an expensive monthly membership that is far higher than you would pay normally.
-There are ads for competing sites on every member page. Some of the ads are for low prices, that might be worth joining. I've seen ads for $5 for the first month of Metart, which is the lowest price I've ever seen for Metart, a fine softcore glamour site. But I already have a lifetime membership to Metart.
-Boredom from watching too much porn that you don't enjoy. Finding enough porn that you really enjoy can be a problem. Much of the porn at this site, and the network, can seem plain-vanilla, after you watch too much. But that's true at most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you wait for a holiday special, when you can join for $60/yearly, or for a low monthly price through New Sensations, is a worthwhile join. I think you get more than your money's worth with some enjoyable porn.
For some reason, if you join through one of the satellite sites (a site that is part of New Sensations, and gives you the same access to the same sites), you might pay a higher price.
That's just the way some networks work. I'd hate to pay $120 for a year's membership, and then find that I could have had it for $60 during a holiday special if I got the same access through a different portal.
Let me re-phrase that: you can pay $120 to access a network. Or you can pay $60 for the same access. It can depend on when you purchase the membership. And through which portal.
Technically, a membership in Heavy Handfuls is not the same as a membership in New Sensations.
But both memberships give you the same privileges: access to the same sites.
I've had this difference pointed out to me with a membership in a Wow network site and also a membership to 21 Sextury (part of the Adult Time network). It's a technical or legal difference, that on a practical level, doesn't seem to matter, as far as I can tell. Except that it probably does matter, in certain circumstances, or they wouldn't make such a big deal about it.
Bottom line: access to Heavey Handfuls is a great thing is you're a fan of big-breasts.
And even if you don't think big breasts are the greatest, it's still worth glancing through the videos to find what you can enjoy.
Some of the plots (even though they are mainly minimal) can be interesting: you wonder how much better the video would be if they put more thought into the writing and acting.
But these are basically good quality videos: the videos are professionally shot, good sets, good camera-work, mainly attractive models, good lighting and sound control.
And you get access to over 7500 videos, with your network membership.
So I think it's worth more than $60/year.
Note: Maybe I'm paying too much attention to price. But the link to Heavy Handfuls from PU (and TBP) leads to a join page at Heavy Handfuls that currently shows:
$119.95/year
$29.95/month
PU (and TBP) shows
$119.95/year
$14.95/month
Maybe Heavy Handfuls changes their prices once in a while.
But check to see what price you're paying.
It pays to check.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-06-2212:19pm (Update History) Reason: Membership price increased. That is important.
Pros:
NOTE: prices went up after I joined. Now costs around $95/year, or $30/month. Very expensive compared to what I paid.
-The Lesbian Experience is a site in the New Sensations network.
-There are no premium sites in the New Sensations network that you have to pay extra for. All sites are included.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. For all sites in the network.
-Navigation is simple for the site and the network. Can arrange the site videos chronologically or alphabetically.
-Starting in 2018, the site offered 4K definition. The 4K definition is offered in multiple bit rates. Before 2017, all videos were offered in 720p and 1080p, in multiple bit rates.
-The videos are mainly sex scenes, but there are also interview videos, where the models talk about getting into porn, how long they've been in porn, a slight bit about personal history.
Some members consider the interview videos boring, but I like to watch them to see if the models show a tiny amount of personality.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The models are mainly A-list porn stars, that you've seen on many different porn sites. Almost all are attractive to extremely attractive.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
-This is a niche site, focusing on lesbian sex. If you're not into lesbian sex, the site will hold little interest, in spite of the very attractive models.
-Watching these videos can destroy your faith in human nature. You will come across scenes where married women (women married to a guy, women married to a girl), will have sex with a different woman, breaking the bonds of holy matrimony. Not only will these lesbian sluts have illicit sex, but they will do it with moans and groans of sexual ecstasy.
-Also, I've watched some of these same women who are admitted lesbians, have sex with men on other sites. That is a crime that I don't even know what to call it.
-There are ads on every member page. Standard for porn sites.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
There is a second pre-checked cross-sale on another join page.
-This is just personal opinion, but many models seem pressured to have surgeries to enhance their physical appearance. I prefer a natural look with less surgical scarring and less botox-enhanced lips/whatever.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you're in the mood for lesbian sex, The Lesbian Experience seems like a good place to visit.
-It's low-cost membership fee is attractive: $60/year.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Quality videos, up to 4K starting in 2018.
Nice sets, good colors and lighting, attractive models.
The scenes have minimal plots: there's a tiny amount of seduction, and then the sex.
You're supposed to think that all attractive women are horny as hell.
On the negative side, the update rate is irregular, like many of the New Sensations sites.
The last update was 10/31/2021, an interview video. So I don't know if this is an archive site with no more updates, or just another site with very irregular updates.
145 videos. Most are sex scenes, but some are interviews with the models.
The videos all have 720p and 1080p definitions offered, with multiple bit rates.
Starting in 2018, they offered a 4K definition for the videos.
Also, with multiple bit rates.
Since I have a slow wifi connection, I stream with the lowest definition, for less pauses.
I shouldn't have to do this, because the computer and devices I use report my wifi connection should be fast enough to stream without pauses, but in the real world, the fucking videos pause all the time while streaming.
The best way to get around this is to download the videos and watch from the downloaded video file on my PC.
It's good to watch a couple of cute lezzies fooling around, kissing, hugging, snuggling, cuddling before they get down to serious sex. The background music shouldn't be too distracting, and the camera-work should be steady and calm, not jerky or out of focus.
The Lesbian Experience gives good quality videos, not a lot of plot, but if the models are cute and in the mood, it makes for good porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network, a low cost ($60/year) network of quality videos and photosets.
-The short text description of the video is a fine summary of the plot.
-Easy to switch between the sites in the network.
-I don't know why, but looking at the nice-sized thumbnails of the models laying on their backs, or crouching with their ass sticking up in the air, is enough to give you a hard-on, even before you get to the video. Some of these teen models are fucking attractive.
-Watching these videos is a wonderful guide on how to treat young women. Be a man and be strong, so you can give her the hardest cock she's ever tasted, and ram it deep into her tight young holes.
-The good-looking models are always so enthusiastic and verbal about the joys of fucking. Possibly a little over-the-top, but it gives me hope that I can find some cuties to satisfy my needs.
-The school uniforms the girls wear (plaid skirt, white blouse), brings back memories of the Catholic school girls.
Cons:
-You find a video at New Sensations network, it's not immediately apparent which site the video belongs to.
-The title of the site is "FreshOuttaHighSchool". But some models look like in their early 20s. You graduate from high school at 17 or 18.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-I don't think the plots are 100% accurate to real-life situations. In the videos, lovely young girls are always coming on to older men to satisfy their sexual urges. In real life, it seems to me that young girls are not always so willing and able to have sex without some urging on the part of the male partners.
-Very little information is given about the models. You get a nice, extra-large thumbnail of the model to see what she looks like, but no bio or personal data other than height and measurements (height-chest-hips).
-Maybe it's my slow wifi connection, but the video streaming was spotty, with lots of pauses while streaming videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish some of the cuties would make more than one appearance at the site. Riley Reid, Bailey Brooke, and other cuties deserve to be showcased more often, so we can appreciate their lovely bodies and fine acting skills.
-The default file name lists the model, but you need to add the date posted, site, and any other data you need.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site is a nice addition to the New Sensations network.
The site theme is young girls having sex. Often with older men. The older men are usually hesitant to have sex with the girls. The girls are young and attractive, so I don't know why the older men are so hesitant.
Also, the young girls are uniformly cute or attractive, but they are also so horny, that as soon as the men touch them, the girls start moaning and screaming and shouting they are going to come. Is that the way it happens in real life?
Enquiring minds want to know: are the videos at New Sensations teaching us to behave properly in the real world, or are these videos fantasies from perverted male minds?
I was brought up to believe we should always give the benefit of the doubt to people, when there is a question of honor. So I think that New Sensations is giving us videos that will teach us to behave honorably towards women, to give women what they've always secretly craved: a good, stiff cock right where it counts.
The older videos have 720p and 1080p definitions for streaming and downloading, but 4K was not introduced until 2018.
The streaming have 2 choices for bit rates.
The older downloads might only have 1 choice for bit rates.
But many downloads have multiple choices for bit rates, for each definition offered.
The videos and photosets have fine technical qualities and are a pleasure to watch: nice sets, excellent colors and lighting, professional camera-work, attractive models, good sound control, etc.
The main factor, after checking to see that the videos are good technical quality, is how cute or attractive are the models.
The models at FreshOuttaHighSchool (and at New Sensations network) are scrumptious.
There are plenty of models to drool over.
Cute, attractive, lovely, there are plenty of good-looking young women that should appeal to you.
The main selling points of the site:
-low membership price: $60/year.
-high quality videos and photosets.
-access to the New Sensations network, of 7,500+ scenes.
-Thousands of A-list pornstars that are attractive.
-Easy site and network navigation.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. A large network with over 7500 scenes.
-Large site. 506 videos.
-One-year membership is only $60. Low price for a quality site and network.
-Navigation is easy. Can switch between network sites easily, without needing to re-login.
-Nice search engine. You can search within a site, or within the network. Search by model's name, etc.
-You can add videos to your favorite list.
-Can comment on each video.
Cons:
-I think the cons are basically minor. This is a nice site, a nice network.
-You have 506 videos. Most of the videos are sex videos. But some (a minor percentage) are interviews of the models. Some members might think the model interviews are boring. But I thought it was a chance to see the models talk a bit about themselves. The models answer questions about how they got into porn, how long they've been in porn, a tiny bit about themselves. Many of the models state they've only been in porn for less than one year.
-The site theme seems dated. Maybe I'm jaded, but the story-line of a woman having sex with someone not her husband does not add a lot of excitement to the plot.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Most videos don't have many comments by members. And the comments I've read are mostly not worth reading.
Bottom Line:
HotwifeXXX features wives who get off on sex outside of their marriage. Who believes that in today's world, if you get married, your partner won't cheat on you?
Maybe I've been watching too much porn to believe that sex outside of marriage will send you straight to hell.
But these videos show women women having sex with strangers. The sex can be with a guy or a girl. So girl-girl sex could be an extra thrill. I mean, if you have sex outside of marriage, according to the bible, you could be stoned to death. And if a married woman has sex with a woman, that's double grounds for stoning to death.
The videos often portray the husband allowing his wife to have sex with someone else. I guess that not only does the wife get a thrill from illicit sex, but the husband also gets a thrill from knowing his wife enjoys sex with other people.
This site teaches you that people have many perversions.
So joining the site will broaden your mind.
There is a photoset that accompanies each sex video (but not the interview videos).
The photoset has about 151 photos.
The photos are good quality (not low-quality screenshots).
So if you like the model and the sex video, you can collect the photosets.
The photoset zip file downloads with the name of the model, but you need to manually add the title of the video, the date posted, and the site.
The zip file comes in only one definition, which is large.
Photos are 5760x3840.
Each photo is around 5 MB.
With around 151 photos per set, the average photoset takes up 768 MB, which is a lot of space.
So I recommend only keeping the sets you really enjoy.
Video runtime for the sex videos run 20 to 40 minutes.
Each video comes with a short text file that is supposed to tell you the plot.
I don't think the writers that are supposed to summarize the plot bother to watch the videos.
The writer knows that a girl is supposed to have sex, so he makes up a story about a girl having sex. The story doesn't match the video's plot.
The written text file story often has details that aren't shown or told in the voice-over that plays with the video.
So the short text file summary is worthless.
The sex videos are well videotaped, nice colors, nice settings, the models are usually very attractive, but the writers that are supposed to summarize the video plot make up their own stories, instead of watching the videos.
I guess they are bored with porn, and don't want to spend the time it takes to watch these videos.
The staff that run the site should check that the text stories match the plot of the video.
It should be very easy for the text writers to read the script of the video, and make a summary.
Based on the quality of the videos, which have excellent technical features (good settings, nice colors for the film, attractive models), and the choices for downloading or streaming the videos, plus the low membership cost ($60/year), I highly recommend the site and the network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network.
-Videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
There are also a number of videos with a 4K option.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Content is exclusive for the site.
-The models are teens, attractive to very attractive.
-The models are girl-next-door types. They are young teens at the start of their careers (except many porn stars have a very short career, lasting a few years at best).
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The PU link to the site leads to a join of $30/month.
RabbitsReviews(sister site of PU) has a link to the site of $15 for the first month.
But during holiday specials, you can often find a discounted price of $60/year (for the Dirty Flix network, which includes Private Casting X).
Bottom Line:
-The narrator/stunt cock is a bullshit artist. First he tells the girl the interview is for a music video and she will make $2000 for a day's work. Then he says the interview is not for a music video, but for a sex tape for his private collection. And no one will ever see the tape but himself. That the girl has not signed a release form, so she is protected.
Porn is fantasy, and porn shooters are bullshit artists. Pierre Woodman is another guy who lies to the models while he is taping them. A girl tells Pierre she doesn't want to be taped, he says, OK, I'm turning off the camera, and the camera keeps recording.
Kind of like a used car salesman.
Or the workers at AT&T who sign you up for internet or TV service, with promises that are worth shit, unless you get the promise in writing. Except the AT&T worker tells you that they don't give you a written contract when you sign up, it's all done digitally. And when you come into the office a few months later, saying you were charged for a service when you were told you wouldn't be charged, the salesperson states the original salesperson make a mistake when telling you you wouldn't be charged. And that the office no longer has a copy of the digital contract. This is true for AT&T, a major multi-billion US corporation that dates back to the 1800s.
Site has cute models.
The videos are crisp and clear.
Navigation is easy.
The videos are worth watching.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Membership includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-The main draw of this site (and the network) is the level of attractiveness of the teen models: they range from cute to gorgeous. These are not glamour models, but they could have easily been featured at MetArt or Femjoy or any fine photo site. I mean, these girls are fucking impressive in how cute or lovely they are. The models are often found at Teen Mega World and 18 Videoz and other sites which have a lot of cute teens.
On average, I think the teen models at 18 Virgin Sex compare favorably with the Diesel network (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), which is the finest collection of teen models I've ever seen for hardcore sex.
-There is a short text description of the plot/action of the video.
-The plots are simple, so they don't require much acting on the part of the model. Which is a good thing, since most teen porn stars are poor actors.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Most models are slender white European teens. Most models have small or medium breasts. No boob jobs that I've seen yet. The girls range from attractive to extremely attractive.
I appreciate that in many of the videos I've seen, the girls act naturally: when I see or hear a girl moaning right from the start because she's touching herself, or the guy is touching her, it's a turn-off. I know it's fake. I prefer a more realistic approach, more natural acting. Not every video is a winner or a keeper. Sometimes the girl is less attractive. Sometimes she tries to put on a show of fake excitement right from the start that is too fake to believe.
But some girls are gorgeous, and they can sometimes put on a great show.
-Some of the videos appear to be exclusive. Other videos probably aren't exclusive to the site. Certainly, if you visit the porn tube sites, you've probably come across plenty of videos from the 18 Virgin Sex site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Irregular update rate. Could have 0 to 3 updates in a month for the 18 Virgin Sex site.
For the network as a whole, you might have 0 to 5 updates in a month.
-Based on the slow update rate, I would not join this site/network for more than 1 month.
Unless they changed their policies, and started sending the fresh-faced models to my house (joke- Ha-Ha).
-They don't bother to post the dates these videos/photosets were added to the site.
-There is a page of specials, which is really just advertising for other sites.
-There is a model listing.
The model listing has a small thumbnail for each model.
You can sort the model listing by:
-the entire network, or
-by the site you want to examine, or
-by the model's name, alphabetically, or
-by the model's rating (how popular she is), or
-by the model's number of scenes, or
-by the model's date. Not sure if this refers to the date the model first appeared at the site or network, or some factor in her videos or photosets. Since almost all videos and photosets show no date, you have to take this sorting-factor on faith. It's a worthless factor to sort by.
And the model's popularity is also a worthless factor to sort by.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Did you ever wonder what it's like to fuck a virgin?
At 18 Virgin Sex, you get to see cute, nubile girls (18 years old, as shown by their birth certificate, which is mailed to you personally, once you send in your $1,000 US dollar certified bank check), getting fucked for the first time.
It only takes another $1,000 US dollars for a certificate signed by a respected European medical doctor ceritifying the girl's virginity before the sex act is performed on her.
For an additional $19,999.99 US dollars and cents, the girl herself will appear at your doorstep, and you can sample her wares, to send you into heavenly bliss, without the assistance of any drugs. If drugs are needed, due to your old age, apply to your health care provider.
The main negative for the site (and network) is the slow update rate. You have around 35 sites
in the network you gain access to with a membership in 18 Virgin Sex. But you only get anywhere from 0 to 5 updates per month. I mean 5 new videos per month max (along with the matching photosets) for the network. The 18 Virgin Sex site updates with 0 to 3 videos per month.
-Photosets run around 60 - 160 photos per set.
You can view the photos in a slide show, or download the set in a zip file.
You can select the time interval for the slide show from 5 seconds to 25 seconds.
The zip file downloads with a generic filename, "zip_photos.zip", which you have to re-name to show the models name, set title, site. There's no posting date for the photoset.
There's only one definition for the zip file: no choice of low, medium and high definition.
The photos in a photoset are low quality: since many of the girls are attractive to extremely attractive, they really deserve a better quality photoset. Even girls you know to be very attractive lose much of the attractive quality because the photos don't showcase how lovely they can be. The videos do a better job capturing the models. Which is the opposite of what a glamour photo site does: glamour photo sites normally present the models most attractively in their photos, with the model coming across as less attractive in their videos, since it's much easier to photoshop a photo versus photoshopping a video.
My best guess is that the photo sets are low-quality screen caps made from the video.
I've seen other teen sites that make much better, more attractive photosets from their videos from a software program.
And that's a shame: because some of the models at 18 Virgin Sex (and the network) are really attractive; and many of the rest of the models, while less attractive, are still worth looking at. So it's a wasted opportunity using attractive models but giving the members such poor-looking screen cap photosets.
The girls are usually playing themselves without a lot of over-the-top screams or other noises to illustrate how fake-excited they are.
Videos run around 15 minutes.
The site has 425 videos.
Plus matching photosets (or maybe I should call them screencap sets).
You can rate the videos, and add them to a favorites list.
Each video has a brief text description of the plot/action, and a very small number of tags describing the action.
The text plot description can be wrong: I think the people who wrote the plot descriptions didn't bother to watch the videos they were describing. And the tags can be misleading, as well.
Example:
The text description for a video is as follows:
"Erika Korti's boyfriend is away from her for some time already. Thanks to modern technologies they chat with each other every day. They even discuss their sexual fantasies online. Sure, such conversations turn on the hottie to the limit. She takes off her clothes to caress her beautiful tits, flat tummy, long legs, and wet pussy.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-21 Sextreme is a channel in the Adult Time network. It used to be a separate network, but it was merged into the Adult Time network a few years ago.
If you put "21 Sextreme" into the browser address bar, it brings up the 21sextreme.com page, which states that 21 Sextreme is an Adult Time studio, and that 21 Sextreme is part of Adult Time.
Edit: On the join page, it says you are joining 21sextreme.com. It does not state specifically that you are joining Adult Time, or that you are getting access to the Adult Time network.
But on the preceding public pages, it does state that 21 Sextreme is part of the Adult Time network. So you can assume that you are getting access to the Adult Time network, or can call or live-chat customer support if you want confirmation of your Adult Time network access.
-As part of the Adult Time network, you are getting access to over 55,000 hardcore videos.
Covering a wide variety of niches.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
All the common niches are more than covered: teens, cocksucking, pussy fucking, anal fucking, lesbian, etc. The Adult Time channel is now adding gay (male gay) content to broaden their audience appeal.
-There are two main membership options:
A streaming only membership, at $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
A yearly membership, at $7.95/month, billed at $95.40 at the start of each year.
The yearly memberships include streaming and downloading privileges.
During holidays, you can often find lower priced memberships offered to some Adult Time channels.
-There are 8+ releases daily.
-250+ channels to choose from, covering a wide variety of niches.
-Many videos are offered from 288p through 2160p.
-There is a public page of upcoming videos that highlights what the Adult Time network will be releasing soon. As well as a member's blog that provides more details.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor for the channel and the networks.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
However, even minor cons can be frustrating at times.
-Due to the massive content at the Adult Time network, and even at the 21 networks, it can be time-consuming to find the content that appeals to you. There will almost certainly be plenty of content that is doesn't fit your tastes. The 21 Sextreme network, by itself, lists 4,453 videos (with about the same amount of matching photo sets).
-One of the largest niches that 21 Sextreme serves is the older man/younger woman. There are well over 1,000 videos in this category. And the older men can be disgusting. They are chosen for their gross physical looks, and you wonder what's driving these younger women into sex with these older men? A paycheck, is what I figure. These are pornstars, after all.
-The level of attractiveness of the younger women is below par. At some older/sites sites, the young women are mainly cute young teens. But at the 21 Sextreme network, the younger women are just OK-looking women who are past their teen years, and don't look cute. Their main attraction is they are younger than the gross old men they are having sex with.
-The models (men and women) were not chosen for their acting skills. While the plots are minimal, the models do a shit job of playing their roles. However, you have to admire the vigor these grandpas show while fucking their young women: I only wish I had the endurance these old men have.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you're into kink, the 21 Sextreme network provides plenty of content.
I prefer the Pure Taboo channel of Adult Time, for their story-driven plots, where the stories can be imaginative and the models often exhibit suprising talent for acting their roles. And the models are usually far more attractive than the models at the 21 Sextreme network.
However, the 21 Sextreme network does provide a huge amount of hardcore videos with good to excellent production values: the images can be crisp and clear, the colors are vibrant, the lighting and sound control is good.
I suggest downing a few shots of your favorite brew before watching these videos: turn off your brain, and enjoy the naked female flesh on display.
And for variety, you can watch old/young lesbian love, where older women seduce younger women. Or the other way around. The older women are usually not as gross as the older men, thank goodness. But again, the younger women are not usually as attractive as the models I've seen at most competing old/young sites (Teen Mega World, Oldje, etc.).
I'm giving the 21 Sextreme network a score of 90. That's mainly for the Adult Time network access. Adult Time is the best bargain in porn today: a huge catalog of quality hardcore videos, with thousands of A-list porn models, for a low price. It doesn't get better than that.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DP Fanatics is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it's considered a separate site. On the web page for DP Fanatics, it states that DP Fanatics is "A 21 Sextury website".
However, 21 Sextury no longer exists as a separate network: 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network a few years back. When I contacted Adult Time network support, I was told that 21 Sextury still exists, even though it is now part of the Adult Time network.
-The model selection is attractive young women. Mostly white, European girls.
-The women are featured in hardcore sex: they are getting rammed by two guys, in their mouth, their pussy, their ass. So if you're into rough sex or anal sex, this is a site that will arouse your interest.
-Membership in DP Fanatics gives you access to the 21 Sextury network, as well as the Adult Time network. I'm not sure why they emphasize the 21 Sextury network, since 21 Sextury is only a small part of Adult Time network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the 21 Sextury network, this is a professional site, where the technical features of the videos and photos are excellent:
-Video definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Excellent camera work.
-Clear, crisp images, vivid colors, natural flesh tones on the actors.
-Nice sets.
-Unlimited streaming.
-If you have downloading privileges, there's a 300 GB daily downloading limit. Which is more than enough for most people. I really don't know why they need a daily download limit, except for data hogs who try to download the entire network for piracy.
-High res zip file for each photo set.
-There is an excellent model page, with hot links to the model's content at the entire Adult Time network. As well as a model listing. The model listing has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, and you can view it by alphabetical, newest, or most popular. But since you have 13,834 models at the network (female and male), searching through the listing can be a mind-numbing experien
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-My personal preference is seeing one guy and one girl having sex. Or two women having sex.
I don't enjoy three-somes as much. Or four-somes or even-higher-somes. Keep it simple, is my thinking. But for people who enjoy three-somes, this site/channel fits the bill.
-I also don't think anal sex is the end of the world in sex. That's just me. There are plenty of PU members who really enjoy anal sex. And this channel emphasizes anal sex.
-Although the models are attractive, many of them seem to have breast implants. I mean, the breasts can be nice-sized, but they stick straight out, and barely move when the models move. Their breasts are more like bolt-ons. Their breasts don't jiggle. And when the breasts are large-sized, they are even more bolt-on, more jiggle-free, and would look better in photos, where the implants would be less obvious.
-I think the DP Fanatics site might give the wrong impression to PU members. The most common plot for the videos is a young woman walks by the glass door of a house and flashes her ass and bare breasts at the 2 guys sitting inside. The guys immediately start to rub their crotches. And then take out their cocks and start stroking away. The girl goes into the house, and it's sex party time, with cocksucking, pussy fucking, ass fucking. Real life is not like this, and if a PU member expects this kind of behavior, he (or she) will be sorely disappointed.
-If you join directly through the DP Fanatics site, the choices are:
-$9.95/month, streaming only membership
-$95.40/year, streaming + download membership.
-There's very little plot to the videos. You have a girl and two guys. They appear on screen. And with little or no interaction, they start fucking. So if you're impatient for the "good" parts to start, this site delivers the goods.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): DP Fanatics is an excellent channel of Adult Time.
Adult Time is probably one of the finest bargains in porn today.
For a low price, you gain access to over 50,000 hardcore videos and photo sets.
The quality of the content is good to extremely good.
The content covers a wide variety of niches.
There are 655 videos listed for DP Fanatics. So it's a large channel. The models are attractive, but I don't care for all the breast implants the models seem to favor. Also, I prefer a little more plot to my videos: otherwise, it's just two or more bodies slapping against each other, with little meaning to the sex. Maybe I'm a romantic, who thinks sex should have some meaning to it, even though I realize that horniness is reason enough.
But the videos are crystal clear, with excellent technical production values.
The channel is excellent, but it's not my cup of tea.
There are other channels in the Adult Time network that I enjoy far more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Out of the Family used to be part of the Devils Film network years ago. But Devils Film is now part of Adult Time, and Out of the Family is now included in the Adult Time network.
-With the Adult Time network, you get access to over 52,000 videos, over 250 channels.
-You also get 24/7 customer and technical support, with a live chat line (in addition to email and telephone support). Live chat answers almost immediately.
-Can also use this with Roku and Chromcast. I have Roku, but don't know how to use it yet. But Roku is supposed to make using your TV easier.
-Out of the Family is an educational channel. If you have any personal family issues, you can watch an Out of the Family video and get helpful advice on solving your problems: Sex is the best medicine for reducing stress.
-Newer videos are available to stream in 160p through 4K(2160p) resolution.
Some memberships are streaming only, some memberships include downloads.
CONTINUED:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Memberships with downloads cost more. Currently, you can have a monthly streaming only membership for $9.95,
or yearly for $95.40 with streaming and downloading privileges.
-You have 8+ updates daily for the Adult Time network.
-Out of the Family channel is still updating.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Login is easy. If you have cookies enabled, and you go to the adult time page, you are automatically entered into the member's area, without having to enter your login details.
CONS(START OF):
-Navigation can be cumbersome. Trying to list all the videos of a particular channel (sites are called channels at Adult Time) can be tricky, especially with sites with lots of videos.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems, to me, to be a huge amount of data you can download. So it's a minor quibble which won't affect most people. I believe streaming is unlimited.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
CONTINUED:
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Currently, there is very little content for gay men at Adult Time. But they are slowly expanding their gay content in 2021.
-The sheer amount of content at Adult Time can be both rewarding and frustrating. Rewarding, because there is a ton of good to great content available. Frustrating, because to pour through the content to find what appeals to you can be time consuming.
-There are trailers to illustrate what the video is about. But I can't get any of the trailers to play. Don't know if this is a problem of my computer, or a site problem. However, there is a fine text description for each video, as well as tags to describe the action.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Adult Time is probably the finest bargain in porn today. You get a massive catalog of hardcore porn videos, covering a wide range of niches: straight porn (male/female), lesbian, trans, taboo, fetish, teen, MILF, etc. You get multiple daily updates. Thousands of performers. The yearly cost is only $95. And there are sometimes holiday discounts with cheaper rates.
Out of the Family started around 10 years ago. The channel has 880 videos, going back years. The modern videos feature a modern porn slut slant: a step mother drops by her step-son's apartment, and seduces him into a blow job, vaginal sex, anal sex. When a friend of the step- son drops by unexpectedly, the step mother invites the friend to join in, which he does. Watching this video teaches you a valuable life lesson: when a strange lady offers you her body, don't hesitate, just start fucking.
The site theme is taboo sex between people who are often related by law. Could be step children playing with each other, step children playing with their step parents. Even guys or girls playing with each other, if their step relations (male or female) chime in.
This is considered reality porn, but it's the kinkiest reality you've ever seen.
I recommend the channel, Out of the Family, because it's a nice-sized channel of hard core porn where you can watch perverts fucking their step-inlaws. Open a six-pack of beer, lay back, and enjoy the action: which is presented in crystal-clear colors.
Giving the site a score of 90. The main value is the access to the Adult Time network. But the Out of the Family channel is a good addition to the network, and could give you many hours of pleasurable porn viewing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This review is based on the Spank Monster channel of Adult Time. There is a separate Spank Monster site, but I would not recommend joining the original Spank Monster site for a few reasons.
See the Bottom Line summary section of this review to see why I would join AdulT Time instead of joining the Spank Monster site.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in definitions from 160p through 2160p.
-The production values are good to excellent: nice sets, cute teen models, excellent lighting, good sound control.
-Even though the plots soon get repetitious, and I think the stunt cock (Jay Rock) is sort of slow-witted because he keeps resisting these cute teen girls who want to fuck him, I have to give Jay credit for picking such cute teens for his step-daughters.
-The models are cute teens or early-twenties girls. Not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of make-up. Very few piercings (except for the belly-button stud).
Cons:
-This is an Adult Time channel. So the navigation could be much better. If you try to bring up the Spank Monster channel listing, it might not load. Or if you try to get around that by an aphabetical listing of channels to find the Spank Monster channel, you can find the alphabetical listing is not alphabetical, but out of order.
-The camera work could be better. The video sometimes get out of focus. And it can have jumps, which should be edited better. Really, Jay Rock should hire a videographer to shoot the videos, which would make the videos better, except he probably figures the videos are good enough without the expense of hiring a videographer.
-There is no text file to explain the plot. But most videos have the same plot of the step-daughter seducing the step-father. Or a step-brother having sex with his step-sister.
-Few tags to describe the video. So searching by tags is not worthwhile.
-There are no model bios for the channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Reasons for joining Adult Time (which has a Spank Monster channel) instead of joining the original Spank Monster site:
-Membership in the original Spank Monster site is expensive. 12-month membership is $150.
You can join Adult Time for $95/year, or less if you join on a holiday discount.
-Spank Monster site is streaming only.
Spank Monster channel includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
Actually, there is a daily limit of 300GB at Adult Time, but unless you are a porn fanatic trying to download the entire network, that limit should never affect you. So I consider that unlimited downloads, rather than having to state in every review of the network that there is a 300 GB daily download limit.
-If you join the Adult Time network, you get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, and over 50,000 photo galleries. Covering a wide variety of porn niches, with 1,000s of porn models.
If you join Spank Monster site, you gain access to over 100 videos, featuring about 100 porn models.
So Spank Monster site has limited content, compared to Adult Time, which has a huge amount of content.
Enough said. The advantages of Adult Time over Spank Monster site are self-evident.
The Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. This is 44% of the 120 videos at the Spank Monster site.
The models at Spank Monster are mainly cute young teens.
Mostly white. You do have a few Black, Asian, Latino models, but very few.
Spank Monster channel has 53 videos.
The runtime for a video is around 33 minutes.
The videos are available for streaming and/or download in 160p or 240p through 2160p.
There is an accompanying photo set for each video.
The photo sets have about 15 pictures per set.
There is a zip file for the photo sets, that downloads with a generic file name, such as 120595.zip.
So you have to re-name the file, if you want to add the model's name, date posted, site, etc.
But I don't know if the sets are worth collecting:
-The models are cute, but the set is a small number of photos.
-Some photos can be out of focus, or poorly framed.
-The main use of a photo set would be to download the set, pick the best photo that shows the model in a pose you like, and keep that photo with the video, to illustrate what the model looks like. And delete the rest of the photo set.
Spank Monster is a new site, started in 2021.
But in a sense, it's a clone of the Jays POV site.
Not a true clone, but the videos at the site (and Adult Time channel) follow the same plot that the Jays POV videos follow:
-You have a stunt cock (Jay Rock) who plays the step-daddy who is seduced into having sex with his step-daughter.
-Or Jay Rock can play the step-brother who has faux incest sex (faux, because these are step-relations, not blood relations) with his step-sister.
- Jay Rock is the stunt cock at Spank Monster, and also the stunt cock at Jays POV. He opened this site because another site will add revenue to his wealth, but there's no difference between this site/channel and the Jays POV site in theme or plot. So unless you are a super-fan of Jay Rock, join the Adult Time network for your Jay Rock fix.
Bottom Line Summary:
Forget the repetitious plots. The lame dialogue. The sometimes poor POV camera work. Some of these cute teens are so fucking adorable you wish you could be the one in bed with them instead of Jay Rock.
The girls put on a good show of seducing Jay Rock.
The videos are good to excllent. Mainly because of the cuteness of the models, but the videos are professionally shot from the POV viewpoint, which is not the greatest. I prefer a standard shooting technique which gives you better camera angles. But the sets are expensive, and the technical features (lighting, sound control) are good to excellent.
I'm giving the Spank Monster channel of the Adult Time network a score of 90.
Mainly because of how cute the girls are.
I don't like the POV camera-work, the lame scripts and dialogue.
So your personal score could be lower.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site is part of the Dirty Flix network.
If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year.
But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites.
-The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading.
But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos.
-There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any.
Cons:
-On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year.
Two cons:
the prices shown are expensive.
instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
-There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven.
-Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month.
-Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites).
-There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Movies: 121
Photosets: 121
Models: around 121
Site launched in 2014
Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes
The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic.
Site theme: nerdy girls having sex.
What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass.
Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are.
You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing.
The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you.
These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt.
The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man.
Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex.
The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them.
If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models are attractive teens. Site (and 18Videoz network) does a great job finding cute young teens. Some girls might be in their early twenties, but these girls look young (but still legal).
-There is a text description of the video that is brief but covers the minor plot. There's almost no plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they've got sex on the brain. You have to admire these Russians, they don't waste a lot of time on non-essentials before getting to the sex.
-The tags also do a fine job tagging the action.
-Navigation is simple and easy. The site structure is basic: not a lot of bells and whistles, but that's good, because the site focuses on giving you a lot of hot teen sex.
-You are allowed to comment on the videos. And the comments can be worth reading. They show that the members really appreciate how attractive these models are, how hot the sex can be. The sex is straight-forward, not over-the-top acrobatics, almost no seduction or build-up, but these models are cute.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
And you don't need a plot or seduction to enjoy watching these teens expose their bodies and get it on.
I don't know why it doesn't get boring. At many competing sites, the sex can get boring because of stupid plots and poor acting. Here, you focus on these teen models, their fine bodies, and it's fucking erotic.
-A very long time before you are logged out for site inactivity.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-All videos are available in low, medium and high definition. 4K definition was introduced in late 2016.
CONS(START OF):
-This is strange. The login can be secure or non-secure. Once you get to the members area, the members pages can be secure or non-secure. I've never seen a network where this happens. Normally you have secure login and member pages, or login and members pages are non-secure. But not at this network.
-The photosets are disappointing. They are low quality screen shots not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a zip file for the photosets. But it's in only one definition.
-The default file name of the downloaded screenshot zip file is the title of the video. So if you do want to collect these photosets, you have to manually add the model's name, date posted, and site.
-When I open a photo from the photoset, and try to manually go through the photos, the photos don't show in order: instead, the photos appear in a random manner. The photos in a set are numbered 1 through XX (up to 100), but they display in a random order, or they don't play in a slide show properly. I check to see that I haven't selected "random order", and the program is set for a normal slideshow. But the screen shots do not display in normal order.
I test to see if my program is working, with a photoset from Metart or Domai, and those sets display normally. But not the sets from Teeny Lovers. The problem seems to be the decoding embedded in the screen cap files.
-Another odd thing about the screen cap files: I open a screen cap file, it's a jpg file. It shows the method is deflated. But the computer does not show/allow the dimensions of the file, which most photosets do allow. The computer shows the file is 649 KB, which is a large size for a jpg file. But no dimensions/definition are shown.
Not only do the screen shot files take a lot of storage space, but they hide the security and details that are shown on most photoset files.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Number of videos: 502.
Videos are available in your choice of definition of low, medium, high, higher, and UHD.
UHD was made available starting in late 2016.
Photosets (really screen shot sets): 50 to 100 screen shots per set.
Number of photosets: 502 (one photoset for each video).
Number of updates per month: 3 or 4 videos(with accompanying photoset).
Teeny Lovers is a good-sized site: 502 videos.
You also get access to about 17 other sites in the network.
The site (and network) is teen orientated.
The main strength of the site (and network) is how cute most of these teens are. If you are into teens, you've seen these teens at such sites as Teen Mega World, Wow sites, Team Skeet, etc. There are also a few that have been featured at the Metart network.
The simple navigation is also a plus factor for the site and network.
The site is easy to navigate.
You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login.
The content for each model is brought at the network is brought up when you click on the model's name.
There is a model's page, that gives you a nice thumbnail of the model and a brief listing of her physical attributes, including her date of birth.
If you want to join, join through the 18Videoz site:
There are discounts for joining the 18Videoz site that should be easy to find: I paid $60/year.
There is also a $15/month option.
Both of these choices include full streaming and unlimited downloads.
If you join through the Teeny Lovers site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will probably pay a much higher price, maybe even double.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
There are no premium sites that require extra payment.
I definitely think Teeny Lovers (and the 18 Videoz network) are worthwhile joins.
Mainly because of the very attractive teen models.
The site/network is easy to use.
If you are into hardcore teen, this site is worth joining.
The plots are simple, they don't put much effort into making the models attractive. But these are young teens who are naturally attractive, they were selected because they are attractive, and willing and able to display their charms on video. It's bread-and-butter sex, not glamour or sensual, but can be hot. And the models are yummy.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Young Libertines is part of the 18 Videoz network. You get access to 18 different sites.
Note: if you join directly through Young Libertines, you pay $29.95/month, or $119.95/year.
If you join through 18Videoz, you pay (with a PU discount) $14.95/month, or $59.95/year.
Both memberships give you access to the same sites.
So do yourself a favor and join through 18Videoz.
-They have really improved the technical features of the videos. And the quality of the sets.
The clothes the models and stunt cocks wear are not expensive, but not cheap. They are regular clothes, which goes along with the upgraded videos you see at the site. The videos are now really nice. And watching a video can be very different from the older videos: it's like you're watching a video in real-life: a lovely young teen takes a shower, her hands stroke her body, slightly suggestive, but not getting into masturbation.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
She finishes the shower, puts on some clothes, a boy comes over, they kiss, and then have sex. The sex is plain vanilla; but the girl is attractive, and the sex is real, not over-the-top theatrics.
-You have a choice of streaming and downloading in low, medium or high definition. The newer videos offer a 4K definition (starting in November 2016).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The site is not glamour. The models don't wear a lot of make-up, the clothes are regular street clothes. But the teens are mainly fresh young teens, attractive to really lovely. The videos are
crystal clear, nicely focused, and the girls are mainly attractive to fucking yummy.
-The videos have lots of tags to describe the action. The text description is not as good, it's more generic that doesn't really tell you much.
-You click on a model's name, and links to all her video content at the network appear.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-The thumbnails for the videos are disappointing. They are small, and on the video listing, don't give you a clear picture of the model. But on the individual video listing, the photo is very large (12" by 7" on 27" monitor) and gives you a clear picture of the model. However, the flesh tones and the photo could be improved to present the model more attractively.
-It's confusing. Sometimes member pages are secure. Sometimes they are not secure. I don't think I've ever seen a site where you see mixed pages of secure and non-secure member pages.
Let me explain: if one member page is secure, all the member pages will be secure for that login.
If a member page is not secure, all the member pages will be non-secure for that login.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-18Videoz and DirtyFlix are run by the same people. A lot of the videos (and the accompanying photo sets) are posted at both networks. This increases the update rate at both networks. But it reduces the value of having a membership at both sites.
-Most videos and photo sets have a yellowish tinge. Which is disappointing. I don't know if this is due to lighting or a filter. Natural colors would improve the videos/photo sets a lot.
-Login details are computer generated.
-The photo set are screen shots. The zip file provided only has one definition.
-Slow update rate. Used to be about 2 videos per month. But has slowed to 1 video per month.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
608 Movies. So there's a lot of content for the site.
The network has 3,308 movies.
The site has 2,249 models.
You can sort the movies by newest, top rated, runtime.
Videos normally run 20 to 30 minutes.
Photo sets have around 50 to 80 photos. These are screen shots, OK to nice quality, usually nicely focused. But these girls are attractive, they really deserve a photographic record of the shoot. The level of attractiveness of the models is one of the main strengths of the network.
The low membership price ($60/year, with a PU discount if you join through the PU link to 18Videoz), plus the high level of attractiveness of the models, plus the large amount of content (over 600 videos at the site, over 3300 at the network), make this a worthwhile join.
The plots are simple or non-existent: a girl meets a boy, they go to his apartment, start to kiss, then fuck. Or a boy comes over to the girl's apartment and they kiss and fuck. Or they start in the apartment, kissing and fucking. It doesn't get much simpler than that. No elaborate seduction. Almost no foreplay. Just a kiss or two, if that much, before the get to licking each other's crotch, or sucking and fucking.
So don't expect story-driven plots. These young teens are primed and ready to fuck. Which might get repetitious, except they are young, attractive, and filled with a sex drive that ignores taboos and guilt.
I really enjoy Pure Taboo, a competing site (part of the Adult Time network), which is probably the finest story-driven site with dark sex (sex with guilt). But Young Libertines (and other sites in that network) is a nice change from Pure Taboo, filled with attractive teen girls who enjoy fucking.
Pure Taboo is higher quality in production values, and gives you a cinematic experience.
But a lower membership price makes Young Libertines an attractive alternative.
I enjoy watching attractive young teens displaying their charms.
And some of the models at the Young Libertines site and network are fucking attractive.
Note: forget the site title: Young Libertines. These are young girls that want to have fun. They are not flouting moral rules, which is what the old-time libertines were supposed to do. Flouting the rules was part of the thrill. The Young Libertine site shows girls that are into sex as a way to have fun.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note:
I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price.
Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor.
I disagree.
The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches.
That slant colors this review.
If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is the low membership price.
There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices.
-The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch.
-Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality.
-The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories.
-Members can leave comments on scenes.
-You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from.
-You can also make your own personal play list.
-Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable.
-Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto.
-There is a model listing.
-With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large:
teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Good update rate. 22 videos added this week.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads.
-By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address.
-Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is.
The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week.
Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated.
-Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails.
-The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network.
-Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video.
-Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore.
-Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer.
Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc.
But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link.
-Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great.
-I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats
Videos: 3012
Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour.
Models: 1136
Contributing sites: 70+
Photo sets: 295
Number of photos per set: 100+
-This is a streaming-only network.
So there are two main ways to use it:
1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join.
2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network).
For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months.
I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site.
But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join.
rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt.
(PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.)
Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting.
The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering.
I'm giving the site a score 93.
For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes.
Edit:
I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90.
I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: although I think this site in one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network has been hard hit by the covid epidemic. The network update rate has been slowed to around 10 new scenes per month. You're wasting your money if you buy a membership longer than 1 or 2 months here.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is this is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-Site has 320 scenes. They are refreshing the site with new content.
-The content is exclusive. Aside from tube sites (and torrent sites), which seem to copy almost all porn sites, I've never seen any scenes from this site. I don't use torrent sites, but I do look at PornHub to see new models and find sites I might want to join.
-The selection of models is among the finest of the internet. They also appear at the Wow network, Metart network, X-Art and other fine sites, but when appearing at The White Boxxx, their scenes are like glamorous, erotic movies.
A short list of some of the models featured:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Cherry Kiss, Jia Lissa, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lya Missy, Oxana Chic, Sabrisse, the list of attractive models goes on and on. And the site presents them as lovely as any movie star.
-You can sort the movie listing by newest movies, most popular, most viewed, runtime.
-Movies have a trailer, and a short text description, as well as tags.
-You can stream and/or download videos in your choice of 240p through 1080p.
-There is no download limit for photosets. But the photosets are tiny, 10-14 photos per set.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month. Or a yearly price of $130. But I paid $80/year. Maybe I got a holiday discount?
-There is a link on each video to skip the intro section, which is useful, after you've wasted time watching the same intro again and again.
-You can switch the language the site/network displays.
Site can display in Deutsch, English, Espanol, Francais, Italiano, and more.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
This is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
I say the cons are basically minor, because I'm so impressed with how lovely these models are.
If the models weren't so fucking gorgeous, the cons would irritate me more.
-Irregular update rate. You get one new update per week, approximately. Many sites have taken to reposting older content shot years ago, but this site is still putting out new content.
-You have a download limit of 100 videos per month. This is your limit for the entire network, not just for a single site in the network.
Which means, you will probably need to stay a member for at least two months, to get all the videos you want to collect.
-The photosets are limited to around 10 to 14 photos per set. That is a damn shame, since many of these models are absolutely gorgeous, or at least presented at their finest, and these models deserve a full set of at least 100+ photos per set.
-There is a splash page of ads, and ads on every member page.
-I wish there was a model listing for each site. Instead, you have a model text listing for the entire network. And it's cumbersome to click through the pages of the thumbnail listing of the scenes, looking for the models/scenes you want to view.
-No 4K scenes. Which is surprising for a glamour site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Why do I call this the finest glamcore site on the internet?
They make it an art form to present attractive models in the best light possible. They start with girls who are naturally attractive, then use makeup, wonderful lighting, expensive sets to showcase how lovely these models can be. The girls are doing hardcore porn, so you would normally expect a gritty aspect to the scenes: but not here.
It's like these girls are beautiful angels who came down to earth to show men (and sometimes other women) the heavenly delights of sex: heaven is not a sterile place where everyone spends their time singing the praises of the Lord, but a place where, if you are lucky enough to go up instead of down, you can taste the pleasures of heavenly sex. And that's why they are singing: to proclaim the incredible joy of fucking these women.
But if you're gay, there's probably a section in heaven for gay men.
And for all the other varieties of gender that are clamoring to be heard.
The first video I saw at The White Boxxx was a video of Lena Reif.
Let me quote from a review I did on 07-18-19:
"Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember.
That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network."
I stand by that statement. That one video, by itself, is worth the membership price to the network. I've seen other videos of Lena Reif, at other sites. She's been featured at the Wow network, Metart network, Adult Time, Vixen network, etc. But at The White Boxxx, in this video, she's like an angel come to earth. Absolutely gorgeous.
It's like the difference between file mignon and low-grade hamburger.
She might be attractive at other sites, in other photosets or videos, but in this one video, she is fucking gorgeous.
Bottom line summary:
The main draw of the site is the care they take to present the attractive models as gorgeously as possible.
I mean these are hardcore scenes, and yet the models are fucking lovely.
The sex is mainly slow and sensual, but the scene lighting, the sets, the makeup, the expert camera-work that focuses on the lovely bodies of these models, just add up to one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet.
I'm not saying the site is perfect.
One PU member complained that he was having internet connection problems, couldn't download videos. And he reported that site support was slow to correct the problem.
I've used site support, and had no problem reaching them through email.
Email is slower than telephone or live chat, but that's all there is for support.
I've only used support a couple of times. I had to wait a few days for a response, but any problems I had were resolved.
But if I had a slow internet connection, and couldn't stream or download what I wanted, that would be a deal breaker and I would cancel my sub.
But, thankfully, I've never had a real problem at the network that wasn't resolved fairly soon.
So I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 90.
The girls are presented as gorgeous creatures.
The sex is slow and sensual.
I've seen a few scenes at other sites where the sex could be hotter: Pure Taboo, Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi.
But for glamcore sites, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures, The White Boxxx is the finest site I've seen.
If they increased the update rate for the network, once the covid epidemic is past, I would increase the score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. Excellent layout, easy navigation, all the bells and whistles of a first-rate glamour site.
-The quality of the models is the gold or platinum standard: lovely young women in their late teens or twenties.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Daily updates.
-Photosets go up to 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-Customer support is 24/7 by email. (No phone or live chat support.)
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-There is a blog, where you have a small photo (or very large-sized thumbnail) of different models, with a link to an erotic short story. The photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely young models, with a bit of erotic fiction to get you off.
-There are trailers for the videos, to give you a preview of the video.
-But the photosets and videos also have extensive tags, to describe them, that you can use for searching for content that interests you.
-No DRM. But most sites have stopped using DRM many years ago.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-If you're not a site member, you can buy individual photosets and videos. But that is expensive, and a one-month membership would be a cheaper option.
-PU discount to the site membership, $20/month, or $100/yearly. But sometimes you can find a holiday special for a lower price.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a first-rate glamour site that showcases lovely young women masturbating. The women are are absolutely lovely.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members complain that almost all the models are slender, white, teen-or-early twenty models. They want more diversity in age, body type, race, whatever.
-The site favors girls with natural attributes. Some PU members (some people will always complain, no matter what happens) want girls with tattoos, implants, piercings, harder edge to the sex, for variety.
Note: if a girl does have tattoos, the site usually erases them with photoshop in the photosets.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-No bonus sites included. You get the Metartx site, and access to the live chat shows, which is standard for any Metart network site. But I'm not into live chat shows, too afraid I will get hooked and start spending serious money on these shows.
-The model index lists a few stats for the model, but almost no bio data:
The stats given include: eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, pubic hair style(shaved, trimmed, natural), ethnicity.
-The canned music at the start of the videos is annoying. Better if they deleted the music track.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: beautiful girls masturbating. You can think of this site as Metart (which is mainly softcore) with orgasm. Metart is mainly solo girl content, although there are sets with two or more girls. But it's strictly softcore.
Metartx is mainly solo girls masturbating. Some sets and videos have 2 girls. Masturbation could be considered mid-core or hardcore, depending on who you talk to.
Site stats:
Videos: 1,019
Video runtime: 10-20 minutes
Photosets: 830
Models: 306
Photographers: 40
The main draw to the site is how fucking lovely the models are.
And that the girls are masturbating, instead of the softcore solo action of nude modelling at Metart.
This site is what Playboy should have developed. Instead, Playboy magazine stopped their print magazine, and Playboy today is mainly a brand name that is remembered for its past glory from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.
I'm a sucker for lovely young women. And if they put on a show while mastubating, that only makes it better. Over time, since there is little or no plot, the sex can lose its impact.
But the girls are so lovely, the photography and videos shot with high quality film, nice settings: the girls are not just lovely, but adorable .
You get beautiful girls naked. The action is not rough or over-the-top, but sensual. You could say it's couple-friendly, but solo friendly, as well. Although the perfect solution would be for Metart X to send samples of these models to your home to see if they really match the fantasies they create in your mind.
Basically, as I already stated, Metart X focuses on solo girls masturbating. So it's a more erotic, more sensual site than Metart, with many of the same fine models. Many of the bells and whistles of a top-tier glamor site. A one-month membership is definitely worth your while at $20, or a cheaper membership if you can catch one on a holiday discount.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because the girls are so lovely, the quality of the videos and photosets is outstanding, and the site is easy to use.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large channel with 568 videos.
I got the 568 video count from a listing of all videos under the Anal Teen Angels site, but see the con section to see why that count is not reliable.
-Almost all the vids have a matching photoset, a zip file for easy downloading.
-Almost all the vids feature late teen, early twenty models from Eastern Europe who are mainly white, slender, usually attractive.
-Each video features a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the featured model looks like, and the thumbnails are gifs that show you a brief sketch of the video action.
-The earliest videos offer 160p, 480p, 540p from 2009.
-The default file name of a video includes the video title_model name_file definition. To be inclusive, you can manually add the date posted and the site name.
-Video runtime is 30 minutes or less for the early videos, but the videos of the last few years have a runtime of 40 minutes or less.
-Site is still updating in 2021.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. Site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Some links to download a video definition lead to a 404 error, page not found. So can't download the video in a definition that is supposed to be available.
-Many of the early videos are from other sites, like Devils Film or 21 Sextury. So when I say the number of videos is 568, that is what one page displays, and the pages add up to 568 videos from my personal count of the pages listed. But a different page displays 276 video total for Anal Teen Angels, and a different page lists 375 videos for the Anal Teen Angels site. And a still different page shows a count of 374 videos for Anal Teen Angels.
I only counted all the pages shown for the 568 video count, not bothering to count the individual pages for the other counts listed.
-The 160p and 240p definition videos are not worth watching: the sets are cheap, the lighting is poor, the picture quality is poor.
-The listing of videos in chronological order is not in order.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of videos.
All the videos I saw had some anal action, although there is plenty of other types of sex.
A solo girl might be playing with a dildo, but if she sticks it up her ass, that counts for anal action.
However, most of the anal action is boy-girl, where the guy sticks his dick up her ass.
So if you're into anal action, this site will give you a massive amount of hardcore anal sex.
But you also get solo girl, girl-girl, and girl-girl-girl action, as well.
It's like a smorgasbord of sexual partners.
The models are Eastern Europe, mainly teens to early twenties. A lot of the models are cute.
That you've seen featured at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Teen Skeet, even some models at MetArt and other premium glamour sites. Some of the model names are familiar, but in the porn world, a familiar model can easily have a different name than the one you normally see her with. That's porn world, where a model can have 1 common name, or even 5 to 10 names at different sites.
Over the years, they upgraded the sets, the video equipment, and the videos have shown a lot of improvement over the years.
They started offering 1080p video maybe 8 years ago at this site.
They started offering 4K video around 2019.
The main value of the site is the large amount of cute teen models, doing hardcore sex, including anal sex.
The branding of these videos is messed up.
The site started around 2009.
The first videos used the "Anal Teen Angels" logo.
Then, in 2010, the videos used the "21 Sextury" logo, even though the videos had a link by the thumbnail stating "Anal Teen Angels".
And if you look at the early videos at the site, under the Adult Time network, which the site is part of, you can find a lot of videos with the "Devils Film" logo displayed on the video.
So it's confusing, if you want to search for the videos that belong to Anal Teen Angels, because, like I said, the site will give you different counts for the number of videos that belong to the site, depending on which page you are looking at.
Bottom Line:
Forget the purist approach.
By subscribing to the Adult Time network, or the Anal Teen Angels site, you gain access to a huge amount of hardcore teen anal sex, along with other types of sex. The site is mainly boy/girl, but there's plenty of girl-girl, with some solo girl and multiple girl sex. All the sex includes some form of anal play.
So for people who enjoy anal, this site should be a worthwhile sub.
And the Adult Time network has a boatload of other hardcore anal sex videos, as well as plenty of other hardcore sex action. The Adult Time network has around 54,000 hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the MetArt network. So the basic site structure is basically the same for all the MetArt network of 15+ sites.
This means you get all the trimmings of a first-class photo oriented site:
-High, medium and low resolution zips for each photoset.
-Complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails of the models, with links to each model's content at the site.
-Superior support for email which is 24/7. But a live chat option would be even better.
The support staff will go out of their way to help with any requests.
Probably the finest support of any network, except for Vendo and Famesupport, both of which have a live chat option plus the standard email and telephone support that is 24/7.
-Easy navigation. Can search by model's name, or by title of the photoset or video, or by date posted.
-Good update rate. They update with a new video or photoset every 2 days, which they've continued even during the covid epidemic.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Most of the content is exclusive. But some of the older content is from other sites. If you're a porn expert, you might recognize some of the content from Teen Mega World or other competing sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month. Regular price is $29.99/month.
-No download or streaming limits. Which is nice, in this era of sites setting daily or monthly limits for downloads.
-All videos have a choice of 270p through 1080p. Videos posted from Mar 15, 2015 on have a 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
-Searching by posting date is a little clunky. The main Metart site used to have a simpler system, where each year was laid out more easily. But now you have to find the link for each year and each month you want to search, which takes more clicks.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites, but a little disappointing for a premium porn site that's part of the Metart network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Videos start with the standard Metart intro visual and theme music, which lasts less than 1 minute. I wish they would drop the intro visual and theme music, which they use for many of the videos at the different Metart network sites. It's a form of advertising, but it's waste of time to watch.
I'm being picky, but after seeing the same intro to over 1,000 different videos at the Metart sites, I wish they would eliminate it, or have an option to skip past the intro section.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Life Erotic shares some of the models from the Metart.com site, but also uses a lot of models that are more into midcore. The main Metart.com site is strictly softcore glamcore (although they have been trying to make it a little edgier, with some of the photosets and videos allowing the models to fondle themselves a little). The Life Erotic mainly features female mastubation. There is also some solo nudity and some lesbian sex. To add spice, the model can use toys, fancy costumes, ropes or chains for a hint of BDSM.
Some of the videos can be intriguing or amusing.
One video with Riya, a cute, tiny (5' 2") blonde, aged 18, has Riya walk into her kitchen get a glass of water. She drinks some water, notices a banana, sucks on it, rubs the banana on her crotch, get a condom from a drawer, puts the condom over the banana, and inserts the banana into her pussy.
First time I've seen a banana getting a condom.
Riya then masturbates with the condonized banan.
After she reaches orgasm, she removes the banana, removes the condom and throws it away, then peels the banana and eats it, pumping it in and out her mouth as she savors its sweet flesh…
One of the main lessons from this site is that girls don't need boys to get off: a toy (or fingers) can be an excellent substitute for a boy. Or even another girl.
Metart is supposed to be erotic glamcore without any sex, just nudity. No boys allowed at the site (except for male photographers or videographers). The Life Erotic is erotic glamcore with sex. Mainly solo masturbation by the models, with and without toys, with and without costumes. But there are also some lesbian scenes. Again, no boys allowed at the site.
Comparing the two sites, Metart is probably the premier softcore site on the internet, for several different reasons:
-The vast number of photosets (22,264).
-The vast number of models (3,813).
-The large number of contributing photograpers (289) who can give you their personal viewpoint on the photosets.
-4 updates daily, except 6 updates on the first of each month.
-The complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails that show you what the models look like, and that have links to their content at the site.
-The easy navigation of the site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
-And a number of bells and whistles that make it easy to format the site offerings to your individual taste.
The Life Erotic is a much smaller site. Instead of the softcore approach of the Metart site, The Life Erotic shows the models as sexual creatures. Like Metart, there are no boys at The Life Erotic site, but the girls show you that boys aren't needed to get off: the solo nude scenes, with and without masturbation, can be very erotic, especially with the right costumes and toys and the implied story line behind the photosets and videos. And the lesbian scenes, which are in the minority, also show some edge in presenting the models.
Both sites have a huge number of attractive models.
Most of the models are white, mainly from Eastern Europe, but there are a few Asian, African, and Latina models, but non-white are definitely in the minority.
If you want a more erotic site than Metart, The Life Erotic might be a good choice.
Both sites have the same price of $19.95/month, with a discount from PU.
I suggest a 1-month sub to both sites, if you have the money, to see which site you enjoy more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: I said I was a member of the site for over 1 year. That's because I was a member of Nubile Films for over one year, which is the main site of what I will call the Nubile Films network. The Girls Only Porn site is a recent bonus to the Nubile Films site.
Or you could say, technically, I've only been a member of Girls Only Porn for a few months.
PROS(START OF):
-Girls Only Porn is the newest addition to the Nubile Films network. Nubile Films used to be a standalone site, with no extra sites. But recently they've been adding new sites to the membership. Hot Crazy Mess and The Sitcom Show were the first two sites added. But recently they added Girls Only Porn site.
-Username is your email address.
-Can choose your own password.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Can join with credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit.
-They are having a special of $84/year recently. I have no idea how long that special discount will last.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Girls Only Porn is a good addition to the Nubile Films network. It's quality lesbian porn. The Nubile Films site is also a quality porn site, with excellent, quality porn that is crystal clear video, excellent technical features, streaming and downloading in 270p through 4K,
-Each video has a photoset.
-Photosets average around 38 photos per set. The photos are screen caps, but excellent quality, you can't tell the difference between these screencaps and real photos.
-The photoset downloads in a zip file that is only one definition: 3840x2160px.
The photoset downloads with the name of the scene, but you need to add the model names, date posted, site.
-Number of videos at site = 368.
The site videos go back to August 2012. So the site has been around a long time. But it's only recently that it was added as a bonus site to the Nubile Films site.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
As a large lesbian site addition to Nubile Films, it's fine choice.
The first posted videos, from August 2012, go from 270p through 1080p.
The site started posting 4K videos in Oct 2020, so the 4K videos are a recent addition, and in the minority.
But 1080p is more than good enough for most PU members, I believe. Especially since the site started off offering the 1080p definition way back in 2012.
One of the strengths of the Girls Only Porn site is the level of attractiveness of the models: these girls are attractive to gorgeous:
A quote from Rabbits Reviews on the Nubile Films site: "If you love beautiful all-natural teens, this collection of outstanding porn scenes will be like a wet dream come true."
That quote applies equally to the Girls Only Porn site.
CONS(START OF):
-I believe the cons are minor.
I really like the site. I prefer b-g action, but for a lesbian site, this is excellent.
The videos are clear and crisp.
They update with 1, 2 or 3 new videos per month. The update rate could be improved, made more standardized.
But the models are cute to gorgeous.
And the navigation is so easy, it's like a dream compared to the Adult Time network, which is a jumbled mess.
BOTTOM LINE
The main attraction is the access to Nubile Films, but the Girls Only Porn is a fine addition. There are two other bonus sites you get access to: Hot Crazy Mess and That Sitcom Show.
That Sitcom Show is an archive site, last update was 2019-09-20.
The site videos are parodies of TV shows.
They are supposed to be funny, but I found the videos boring.
The other bonus site is Hot Crazy Mess.
That is also an archive site, with the last posted video on 2020-01-03.
The models at Hot Crazy Mess are mainly cute to very attractive.
And the videos are fine: It's a shame they stopped updating this site, because the site was much better than That Sitcom Show videos.
Giving the Girls Only Porn a score of 90.
Because the models are attractive young teens.
Because the videos are crystal clear (all videos go up to 1080p, the last few months the videos go up to 4K).
Easy navigation.
Very good options for streaming and downloading.
And because you get access to Nubile Films, which is an excellent porn site with outstanding models and professionally shot videos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
