Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: Apparently Fame Digital still exists as a separate network.
However, there is a Fame Digital channel on the Adult Time network that shows a video count of 17,967 videos. So I assume that much of the original Fame Digital content is duplicated at the Adult Time Fame Digital network.
This review is based on the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time.
For some channels at the Adult Time network, the channel can be a very limited version of the original site. But for other channels, the channel can be a very complete version of the original site.
I believe that the Fame Digital channel of Adult Time is a very complete version of the original Fame Digital site.
-As part of the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time, you get access to not only a large amount of Fame Digital content, but also get access to the rest of the Adult Time network. The Adult Time network has 53,182 videos, plus photosets illustrating these videos, plus 271 channels.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Adult Time is now on Amazon Fire TV. So if you have a FireTV device, you can select, load and watch Adult Time channels on your TV.
Adult Time is also available through Roku devices.
Note: because Adult Time has so many channels, it's a great way to sample or enjoy the content of many porn sites, without paying for a subscription to those sites.
-The login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy login. If you have cookies enabled, you open the Fame Digital channel, and you are automatically logged in to the member pages, without having to enter your login details.
-Excellent support team, especially the live chat.
CONS(START OF):
-Most of the Fame Digital videos top out at 480p (even the videos posted in 2019). Which might be the main negative for most PU members.
-Because of the huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult. What is the good of having great content, if you can't find the content you are looking for?
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
For example, I put "Fame Digital" in the search box, and the page that opens shows me a jumbled mess of videos, porn stars, channels, movies, lastest updates, recommended scenes for you, favorite channels, recommended porn stars, recently watched, your favorite scenes, your favorite actors latest scenes, your favorite actors, coming soon.
Keep it simple. Give me a listing of the videos (in chronological order) of the Fame Digital videos.
Or a different set of pages showing the models at the Fame Digital channel (in alphabetical order).
That way, I can browse the channel easily, in a way that makes sense. And it would be easier to find and access the content of the channel that I might enjoy.
Otherwise, the channel has thousands of videos, but I don't know how to search through them, or what they are.
-Another problem: This is a personal issue. I'm trying to find the videos that belong to the Fame Digital channel. But there are so many distracting thumbnails of attractive models and possibly-interesting videos from random channels that fill the pages while I'm searching, that I stop and look at this lovely model, or that maybe-good-scene, so my search for the Fame Digital videos gets interrupted time and again.
Too much content, not laid out in a simple way.
-Some of the Fame Digital channels haven't updated in one or more years: such as Peter North, Silvia Saint, and Tera Patrick. But Devils Film and Rocco Siffredi are still updating with new content, and even have 4K videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The membership options include streaming only (unlimited), and streaming + downloads (both unlimited).
So make sure you choose to include downloads if that is important to you. The current plan at many sites is to charge extra for memberships that include downloading.
-Keep an eye out for deals. You can find deals (especially during holidays, but also during made-up holidays, where they offer a discount and call it some "holiday special") where the discount can be significant.
PU offers a discounted price of $95.40/year (recurring). That includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. But like I wrote, if you search, you can find lower prices at times.
But you also get included some garbage gonzo sites.
The Fame Digital channel (and network) is hardcore gonzo porn. I am speaking loosely. Using gonzo porn as a separate category from glamcore porn.
But the distinctions between porn categories can get blurred: For example: softcore, hardcore, teen, MILF, cuckold, fake incest, group sex, virtual reality, inter-racial, anal, shemale, and other categories can also be mixed into gonzo and glamcore porn.
Channel summary:
Content quantity: huge, especially when you add in the access to the Adult Time network. Fame Digital channel has 17,808 videos.
Adult Time network has 53,182 videos.
Content quality: Some real gems, if you're able to plow through a huge amount of lower grade and medium grade content.
Updates: The Adult Time network has the most updates per day of any network I've seen. Can range from 5 to 10+ daily updates.
Navigation is poor.
I'm giving the Fame Digital channel a score of 90. The main strengths are the huge amount of content, the wide variety of porn models (in age, body type).
The support team is excellent. There is a live chat that answers within a few minutes, one of the best support teams I've ever used, even better than Metart, which I thought was one of the best.
Navigation needs improvement, to make finding and accessing the content easier.
If you want a smorgasbord of porn, or if your porn budget is limited, the Fame Digital channel (with its access to the Adult Time network) is a fine choice. You should get more than your money's worth.
But if your tastes are more specialized, then there are plenty of other fine choices for your porn dollars.
The internet has brought low-cost porn to the masses.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good sized site. 181 scenes.
-High quality production standards: extensive attention to making the models as lovely as possible, expensive sets, crystal-clear videos, good sound control.
-Unlimited streaming. But limited to 100 videos per month for downloads.
-You can watch videos streaming in 240p through 1080p.
-You can download videos in 240p through 1080p (but 100 video downloads per month).
-You can hit the "Skip" link to skip the introduction to a video.
Cons:
-A few PU members have complained about slow download speeds from the site and network.
-Several PU members have complained about the 100 video/month download limit.
-At least one PU member has complained that download managers don't work well with the site or network.
You can't que up several videos and expect them to download correctly.
-Lack of variety of models: some PU members complain girls look like glamour models, too white, too slender, not enough ethnic variety or enough body types.
Note: You can't please everyone. The site (and most of the network) features attractive to lovely models, made to look gorgeous. So some people want a more natural style, where the models don't look so pretty or glamourous.
-A page of ads for other sites you have to pass through to get to the member's area. Then ads for other sites at the bottom of each member page. But a minor distraction.
-No 4K videos at the site.
-Photosets download with a computer-generated filename that is random.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Default filenames don't include the model name, video title, or any useful data.
-Photosets are tiny sets of 10 photos or less. These attractive models deserve a photoset of 100 photos per set.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Video count: 181 Scenes
Video runtime: averages 20 to 30 minutes.
Site theme: Lesbian action. Most of the scenes are two girls making out. But there are solo scenes where a girl is masturbating by herself.
The major attraction of the site is how attractive these models are. Almost all of the models are cute or attractive to lovely.
The site features mainly European models. I would guess Eastern Europe (from Russia or surrounding areas). Slender, white, late teens and twenties in age.
A Girl Knows features lesbian action. Mainly two girls making out. Not a lot of seduction: just two hot girls who find themselves attractive to each other and don't waste time talking, but start exploring each other's bodies with hands, lips, tongues, some use of toys.
There are some beach scenes, and the video photography is so crisp, you wish you were at the beach yourself, with or without the glamourous models, because the ocean water and waves look so good, especially in the heat of summer.
The site (and some other sites in the network) feature high class glamcore porn: Not a lot of heartcore, just attractive people who are enjoying themselves sexually. The sets are expensive, the videos are crisply photographed, the models are made up to look as attractive as possible. The models are A-Class models, with names like: Arteya, Lena Love, Lola Myluv, Lya Missy, Silvie Luca, Vanessa Decker.
My favorite channel in the network is The White Boxxx, because it's one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet: Lovely models, expensive sets, first-class videography. But A Girl Knows is a fine glamcore lesbian site along the same lines as The White Box. The reason I prefer The White Boxxx over A Girl Knows is that The White Box features boy-girl sex, instead of the lesbian sex of A Girl Knows.
That's just my personal preference.
Giving the site a score of 90.
If you experience the problems that other PU members have found, such as slow download speeds, 100 video per month download limit is annoying, download manager doesn't work with the site, member pages are slow to load, the video player is slow, etc., then your personal score of the site would be much lower.
Personally, I no longer download a lot, and the other problems haven't affected me very much. And I don't have any use for 4K videos, which some PU members really appreciate.
That's why I'm giving the channel a score of 90, because I think it's an excellent glamcore lesbian site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 30+ teen sites.
-The last few years, the site offers videos with definitions from 360p through 2160p (UHD).
Earlier videos are from 360p through 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Based on the level of attractiveness of the teen models, the quality of the videos. They are not glam videos, but they are excellent quality: nice sets, nice costumes (nothing fancy or glamourous, just nice clothes), good lighting and sound control.
And the videos are, in my estimation, bread-and-butter videos, showing teen sex in different categories. That applies to the network.
The site features anal sex. Maybe some cock-sucking, pussy-licking, pussy-fucking, but each scene that I saw had at least some anal sex.
I don't know why the videos appeal so much to me. They are just straight sex. Not violent or abusive, just a guy and girl having sex.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
And since the site theme is anal, they include that as part of the sex. The girls seem to really enjoy getting fucked up the ass. Along with getting fucked up their pussies. What can I say? The models, which are mainly attractive to some really lovely girls, are having a good time. And I would assume the guys are too.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure (not https).
-The search engine is poor. If you enter a model's name, you get a bunch of hits that are not the model's name.
-If you want to find the model's content at the site or at the network, go to the model's page, and that will give you links to her content.
-They advertise daily updates. That refers to the network, not to the site. Anal Beauty site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month (with matching photo sets).
-The thumbnails of the models need to be upgraded to show how attractive these girls are.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish they would tone down the moans, groans, screams of pleasure of the models, to make the sex more realistic. I assume the girls are having a good time, but moans, groans, and screams of pleasure are just too theatrical to be real. It's better than having the girls crying and moaning as if in pain, but are these girls really such nymphos that just touching a cock will start them moaning and groaning, and licking the guy's ass and cock and balls while emitting strange sexual noises?
I know some girls do get excited in sex, and make noises, but these models are directed to show excess enthusiasm.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: anal sex.
The site definitely shows anal sex in action. Along with vaginal sex, licking pussies, licking balls and cocks, licking the guy's ass.
So if you are into anal sex, this site should be a good fit.
Just turn down the volume if you don't want your roommates and/or neighbors to hear the screams, moans, bodies-slapping against each other. Although I wrote that the sound control is good, that means that you don't usually hear trains or airplanes or other extraneous sounds. But the noise these girls make is truly excessive. I know they are supposed to be excited, and enjoying the sex, but the noise level from the girls is just too fucking loud. And the guys, while not as noisy, are also told to make grunts and groans to show how much energy they are putting into the sex.
Having said that, these teens are fine-looking girls with lovely bodies. And they put on a sexual show for you. The noise might be excessive, but the basic action is not. And I appreciate that the sex is energetic without being over-the-top with violence or sadistic elements. The girls seem to really appreciate the attention the guys are paying to them.
Anal beauty is a fine teen site. With 144 videos and matching photo sets.
If you are into anal sex, the network has plenty of other anal content.
As well as a wide variety of other teen sex niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Because the site is good, and the network is excellent, if you are into attractive teens having sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn.
-A large catalog of photo sets and videos.
-Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video.
-The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful.
-Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download.
-Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale in join page.
-The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version.
The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat.
-The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Videos: over 1200
Photo sets: Over 1600
Number of photos per set: Over 100
The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation.
-SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets).
-Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable.
Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time".
She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic.
The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site.
I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site.
But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women.
I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models.
What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos.
But their photo sets are really outstanding.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network.
-They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting.
The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls,
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content.
-The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos.
-The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images.
-Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive.
Cons:
-If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network.
However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site.
-I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network.
I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month.
2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos.
2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos.
So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month.
The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month.
Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc.
-Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it.
-The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy.
Site stats:
videos: 121
photo sets: 121
As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful.
What I like about the site and network:
The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex.
The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos.
This is not a glam site or network.
The network started around 2005.
The site (First BGG) started around 2011.
The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites.
Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included
sites.
For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p.
The upgrades included:
With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.)
Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control.
The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality.
The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material.
First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network.
If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower.
But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos
-easy to cancel or modify your subscription
-Content is erotic glamour photos and videos. Basically softcore. Mainly solo models, but some sets with masturbation and toys and girl/girl scenes.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Easy navigation. This is basically a small site, you have photo sets and videos of different models.
You can search for a model's content, but other than that, the search seems pretty useless.
-You can tag your favorite photo sets, videos and models for easy access.
-There is little to no advertising for other sites on the member pages, which is a rarity.
-There is no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Low annual price is $45/year recurring. The other memberships don't make a lot of sense, because they price a monthly membership or other membership options way too high.
-Members can vote to like or dis-like the photo sets and videos, and post comments on the photo sets and videos.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Negative comments are allowed, and not deleted. Unlike some sites, which remove negative comments by members almost immediately.
-Files download with the default title of the set or video plus the name of the model.
-The watermark for the site is small and placed at the bottom right corner of the photo, so it's basically out of the way.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
-To log in, you have to check a box to prove you are not a robot (this is a simple captcha, that is easy to check).
-The site is basically softcore glamour. With the emphasis on solo models. If you want hardcore eroticism, this site is not for you.
-There is a news section, but it's barely used. He was trying to upgrade the content, add a personal touch to the site. But aside from a few photos of some models, and a few replies by members, this section could be deleted.
What it shows is that Tony Murano does not visit the site very often.
Bottom Line:
Number of photo sets: 656
Number of videos: 75
Most of the site content is exclusive.
There is at least one photo set that was previously posted at MetArt years ago.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in 360p, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed or downloaded 360, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed and/or downloaded in Ultra HD, as well.
I rated the site with a 90 on my review that I posted on 2018-05-13.
The main factors for the high score, and recommendation, were:
-I enjoy the work of Tony Murano, the contributing photographer.
He has an eye for attractive models. The models are in their late teens or early twenties.
The site is basically softcore nude glamour.
There are videos, but most of the content is photo sets.
This is not a mega site like MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy. It's the work of one photographer.
But it has 656 photo sets of attractive models, 75 videos.
The annual price is $45, which seems like a bargain.
The low price, combined with the quality of the softcore glamour sets, gives the site a score of 90.
That's my opinion.
TBP rated this site a score of 78 in 2017-08-04.
I can only assume the reviewer was not as impressed with the quality of the photo sets as I am.
The site did a recent update for the public preview, where they made the public preview page more attractive.
But they also updated a new pricing schedule, that makes the membership price much higher, except for the 1-year recurring membership at $45, which is a drop from the $50/year former price.
The prices for the other membership terms are way out of line: they price a non-recurring membership for 1 month at $30, or a non-recurring membership for 1 year at $75, when you can join for $45/year recurring.
And unless you are a complete newbie, you will realize you can join any recurring membership, to get a lower rate, and then cancel as soon as you want, if you don't want to get rebilled.
Whoever decided on the new membership pricing plans made a serious mistake: he has probably turned away a lot of potential members who might have sampled the site at a lower monthly rate.
Which is a shame, because these sites need members to support the site financially.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I saw an ad for a low-priced sub to X Chimera. The models looked attractive.
Went to the site, thinking about a join. Discovered site is part of the Lets Doe It network, which I'm already a member of. I have too many subs, don't have enough time to enjoy all of them.
Glad that I found it was a site that I already have access to, because I don't want to pay for a sub that I already have.
-As part of the Lets Doe It network, the X Chimera channel has many fine-looking models. These are mainly European models, many from Russia or the surrounding areas.
-The production values of the videos are excellent. The lovely models are presented attractively.
The crown jewel of the network is The White Box, where lovely models are presented in high glamcore erotic settings.
But X Chimera also features lovely models in erotic settings. So what's the difference between the two channels? Both channels use lovely models, but at The White Boxxx, extra care is used to make the models appear attractive.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
You have to watch the videos at the two sites to see what I mean.
-Videos (and photosets) are advertised as exclusive. So unless you are a fan of tube sites, the material will be new to you.
-Each photoset has a zip file. But see cons why the photosets are a disappointment.
-You can stream or download the scenes in your choice of definition: 240p thru 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-For some reason, even though my internet download speeds test at 17 Mbps to about 90 Mbps (these are WiFi speeds, not hard-wired speeds), the videos often hang on loading, and I can't stream the videos.
(17 Mbps is supposed to be more than enough speed to stream 1080p videos. And I'm watching these videos at 720p or 480p, which increases the margin of safety even more. But it doesn't work: these videos constantly hang up, instead of loading and playing smoothly.
I don't know what the problem is. But I suspect this is my problem. And most members won't have this problem.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-The biggest con for most people would be this is an archive channel. The last update was 2018-10-12.
-It's a small site. Only 35 videos. Since it's not updating, it won't grow.
-Another con is that even though there is a photo set accompanying each scene, the photosets are tiny. Each photoset has 10 photos or less. Many of the models are gorgeous, they deserve a full-sized photoset, to show off their beauty.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month.
There is no download limits on the photosets, but since the photosets are tiny (10 photos or less per set), the value of the photosets are debatable. Even with a gorgeous model, if you only have a maximum of 10 photos in a set, unless the photographer does a fantastic job, the photo set is more like a tease than a meal to be savored and enjoyed.
Maybe I'm being too picky. You can use a single photo from the set to illustrate what the model looks like, to remind you what the scene is about. Except that it would take time and energy to select a photo to illustrate each scene(put it in the folder where the video file is kept). And I'm lazy about organizing my collection. Keep it simple, keep it easy, don't make me work to organize my porn collection.
-Photosets only have a single definition: no choice of low, medium or high definition.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The channel mixes attractive European models in a fantasy setting where the male model dresses like a rich dude who is getting off on teasing and seducing a beautiful model. So it's like a bondage scene, without the roughness and without the pain. The stunt cock is supposed to be teasing the tied-up model with his hands, lips, tongue, and various toys, into a creature of lust who only wants his cock.
So this is a glamcore version of bondage. On the style of the 50 Shades of Grey movies. Although with even less pain. The 50 Shades of Grey movies are softcore porn, but the heroine (Dakota Johnson) is supposed be feeling some actual pain from the whipping and slapping, but at X Chimera, there is not supposed to be any physical pain, except the torture of heated lust that is not immediately satified.
So this channel is the erotic equivalent of a hardcore Harlequin novel, before the Harlequin novels allowed any sex (back the 1970s).
The setup or plot used is that an attractive women is invited by a mysterious member of a secret, wealthy society.
The woman is excited to accept.
She goes to an expensive home, where she is bathed by two naked women attendants, and then led to a room where a mysterious man is waiting. The woman can be tied or chained, the man or woman can wear a mask, and the man arouses the women to the point of frenzy (the man is a masterful lover who fulfills the woman's wildest fantasies).
Both the man and the woman have powerful orgasms.
Although the idea is good, it gets repetitious after a while. Even when the women are lovely, and the stunt cocks are attractive men, you wish that there was more variation in the plot.
Maybe I'm just getting overdosed on porn.
But I enjoy the simple massage videos at Tricky Masseur. The models are lovely young teens, not presented as attractively as the models at X Chimera, but the plot is simpler, and I the model doesn't need to be an actress to enter a room, undress, get on a massage table, get rubbed down, and then do a partial blow job and and then fuck.
Simpler acting. More believable. Easier to enjoy, because there's less strain on the brain.
Lately, I've been switching off DVDs of disappointing movies that I think are stupid.
I don't have the patience that I used to.
Why waste time on junk?
And that's why I am somewhat disappointed in the X Chimera channel.
It's a good idea. They are riffing on the 50 Shades of Grey theme of glamourous sex of a lovely woman with a rich dude from a secret society.
But even though the women are lovely, it's too much play-acting for me.
I prefer The White Boxxx channel, where the setup is simpler.
My personal opinion is that The White Boxxx is the finest site for glamcore porn of beautiful women. The only quibble might be that they focus more on the glamcore, and lose a bit of heat in the sex.
I'm giving the X Chimera channel a score of 90.
That's because the channel is a good to excellent glamcore site, and also because if you get bored with the channel, you can switch to other good sites in the network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-My Family Pies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to about 14 sites in the network.
-See the reply section for a listing of the current sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month.
-The site is for fans of fake incest (where step-relatives have sex with each other. Fake incest, because there is no blood relationship between the parties, so it's not really illegal, but the mind is supposed to feel thrills because there is a forbidden element to the sex).
-Even though this is fake incest, a lot of the models are attractive females, and the sex can be hot.
-The videos are professionally shot: crisp, clear images, good framing, good lighting.
-CCBill is the primary biller. A trusted name, easy to cancel, easy to contact if there are any problems. However, the customer support team also seems easy to contact if there are any problems.
-The webmaster seems to respond to any problems reported about the site at the PU site.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can stream or download the videos in your choice of definition: 270p-1080p.
-No streaming or downloading limits.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 52 videos currently.
-Slow update rate. Usually 2 or 3 new videos added per month.
-One minor problem is the site names get confusing: You have Nubiles-Porn, Nubiles Casting, Nubiles Unscripted, NubilesET which are all included in the Nubiles-Porn network.
However, the Nubile Films is a stand-alone site, run by the same people that run Nubiles-Porn, but Nubile Films requires a separate membership.
Bottom Line:
Warning: The best way to enjoy the site is to turn off your brain. Or, maybe, to pretend you are taking a psychedelic journey where the images and action are happening in a fantasy land.
Do not let logic or critical thinking impede the story or action, or your enjoyment will drop considerably.
The site niche can be considered fake incest. Since there is also some sex between step father and step daughter, or step mother and step son, or step mother and step daughter, it can also have an element of old-young, although old-young niche usually has a teen girl having sex with a much older man, one old enough to be her grandfather instead of her father.
This is a small site. Currently only has 52 videos, plus matching photo sets.
The site was launched in December 2017.
A slow update rate kept the content small. There are 2 or 3 new videos per month, and that's more or less the rate since starting.
The site shows that even in the times of unrest caused by President Donald Trump, there is hope for America. Which is a wonderful thing. When adults with children marry other adults with children, creating a blended family, there can be tensions and even fighting between the family members.
This site shows that new love can be created: between step children, between step children and step parents. This teaches us that love conquers all.
If you watch Kyler Quinn in the video titled "Don't Tell Daddy", you see a charming young lass and her step brother, Damon Dice, have real feelings for each other. Those feelings are expressed when the couple make out with hugs and kisses. Of course, the feelings have to be kept secret, because these two are step brother and step sister, and they are not married to each other.
But the parents, especially the step father, seem deaf and blind to what is happening between the two loving step children.
The step brother is kind of a dork. He is big and muscular, with a beard starting to sprout, but it's Kyler Quinn, with her lovely face and nimble hands, that caresses Damon's cock until he overcomes his fears of getting caught and allows Kyler to give him a blowjob, then fuck her from behind, while the unsuspecting step father is sitting only a few feet away.
The step father, although not blind, pays no attention to the moans and groans that Kyler emits as she reacts to the pounding her step brother gives her. It can make your heart swell with happiness that the two step siblings are experiencing such joy.
This is what blended families should be doing: make love, not war, the slogan from the hippie era, has spread throughout the videos that My Family Pies is showing.
Also, the video shows that America needs to upgrade its healthcare system, because the step father is obviously going deaf, that he is not able to hear the cries of joy that Kyler is making while getting fucked.
So Donald Trump, our glorious commander-in-chief, needs to start throwing money at the US healthcare system, to improve the services the elderly population is receiving.
Less time on the golf course, commander, and more time speaking to experts who can fix our nation's health care problems.
Some things are more important than money. And Donald Trump has shown us, through a life of clean living and moral turpitude, that love and honor are what really count in life.
If you have a high moral standard, refuse to lie or steal, then you too can create an atmosphere where great porn can be created.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. This is because, in spite of the small size of the site, this site shows how important love can be in a family.
Thus, the moral courage of the family, the strength of family ties, is the bedrock of American values, and lifts the value of the site to something that every PU member can relate to.
However, if you are a Commie-loving SOB, then family values are less important to you, and your enjoyment of the site could drop the score to 75 or less.
(Trump is best friends with Putin and the leader of Communist China, he admires the power they have, which is a good thing, because powerful leaders should all stick together. And maybe Trump can change the constitution, so he can be President For Life, or maybe his daughter Ivanka can take over when Trump retires.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Tricky Masseur is part of the Teen Mega World network (TMW). Joining any one of the sites gives you access to all network sites. There are no premium sites that you have to pay extra for.
-TMW network has over 30 sites in the network. This is a teen network, with real teens as models. The sites cover many porn niches: boy-girl, boy-2 girls, creampie, lesbian, solo female masturbation, toys, virtual reality, high definition videos, etc.
-The network did a recent update which made search and navigation much easier. A few years ago they did a network update that limited the search to the site you joined through. So if you joined any site except for the main TMW site, your search was limited to your join site: meaning, you could not find the content of a model at the network (except at your join site), and even if you spent the time using other methods to find the model's content at the network, to access that content was time-consuming.
PROS CONTINUED BELOW:
Cons:
PROS-CONTINUED:
You would have to log in to each site her content was at, and then page through the video listing pages to find her content at that site.
The latest network update made the search at each site cover the entire network: Also, the search brings up hot links to the model's content, so you don't have to log in separately to each site to access her content.
-PU discount of $14.95/month. Listed price is $29.95/month.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloading.
-You can log in to any site in the network with the same log in details.
-They started offering Ultra High Definition 4K videos on some sites in 2016.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Site has slow, irregular updates. You get one new video in 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 months. However, the network updates with one new video every 1 or 2 days. The network advertises daily updates, but that was true years ago, and the recent updates are one update every 1 or 2 days.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Note: a lot of sites (not just the TMW sites) advertise daily updates, but the advertising is false.
I'm not taking off points for false advertising for TMW, because they used to have daily updates.
-Vendo is the billing agent. CCBill and Epoch are easy to cancel, but I've used Vendo many times over the years, and never had a problem with them.
-Login and member pages are non-secure (not https). Many porn sites are switching to https, so TMW should do this as well.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The TMW network has over 30 sites, covering many teen niches.
The network has over 5,000 videos.
The network has over 2,000 models. The models range from attractive to very attractive. That is one of the main strengths of the network: the selection of cute to lovely teen models.
The models are real teens, naturally attractive: very few implants. Some tattoos, but that's standard for porn models nowadays (and even regular people are getting inked, and not just teens, but older people as well).
The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
My other favorite teen hardcore network would be what used to be called the Diesel Access network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). But they dropped the name of Diesel Access network. Currently, if you join any one of the 3 sites, you get access to all 3 sites, but as far as I can tell, there is no name for the 3 sites as a network.
The main reason those are my two favorite teen hardcore networks is because of the level of attractiveness of the models: The (former) Diesel Access network has put more effort into presenting the models attractively, but these girls are young and naturally attractive.
Also, whether it's an act or whatever, the girls at TMW and Diesel Access seem to enjoy showing off, and enjoy sex, whether it's by themselves (masturbation), with another girl or more than 2 girls, or with a boy or more than one boy.
There are some problems with the Tricky Masseur site.
The slow update rate. For the last year or more, you might get one update in 2, 3, 4, or 5 months.
Also, I'm a big fan of the massage theme in porn: it just seems to have a slightly more realistic approach to sex. I'm not saying the girls aren't following a script, but the script is easy to follow, and makes more sense than many of the stupid plots that porn sites often use.
However, one problem is that many teen sites use the same videos that Tricky Masseur uses. Tricky Masseur posted them first, but if you've been a member of Diesel Access network, you've probably seen many of the Tricky Masseur videos.
The Rub A Teen site, part of the Team Skeet network, is basically a clone of Tricky Masseur. I haven't been a member of Team Skeet for a couple of years now, but the Rub A Teen site had almost all of the Tricky Masseur videos at that time. When I say Rub A Teen is basically a clone of Tricky Masseur, it's because the Rub A Teen site had the Tricky Masseur videos, but no other videos.
I'm assuming that's legal, because, this is guesswork on my part, TMW bought a non-exclusive license for those videos, and Team Skeet did the same.
And Diesel Access did the same, except that Diesel Access did not make a separate massage site for the Tricky Masseur videos, but just threw them into their sites on a random basis.
You can also find some of the Tricky Masseur videos at other porn sites.
Bottom line:
I'm giving the Tricky Masseur site a score of 90.
The biggest con is the slow update rate.
If you've been a member of the Rub A Teen site, you will have seen most or all of the Tricky Masseur videos.
You might also have seen a lot of them if you were a member of the Diesel Access network.
But some of the models at Tricky Masseur, and at TMW network, are just attractive to fucking lovely.
And some of the videos can be hot.
The membership price for TMW (and its satellite sites) keeps rising. It used to be $90/year, for many years, but now it's $119.40/year, even with a PU discount.
I would suggest waiting for a holiday discount price, except I don't remember seeing a discounted price to TMW recently. But there are plenty of other good sites that have discounted prices for holiday specials.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Selection of models is good. These are mainly top-rated porn models, the porn starlets who are mainly starting out in their porn career.
You also get a smattering of older porn stars.
-The videos and photosets are professionally shot. The videos are basically crystal clear, with good to excellent technical qualities: nice sets, excellent lighting and colors, good sound control. So you are watching a video with excellent clarity, and can enjoy the lovely female flesh that is put on display.
-The stories are OK to good. They aren't the stupid parodies so often seen at porn sites, but simple stories of young women satisfying their growing sexual desires.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Cons:
-Search function is clunky. You put in a model's name, sometimes you get no hits, even though the model appears in several of the network's videos.
-There is an alphabetical listing for the models. But the models are listed randomly under their first name.
-The model page is bare bones: You get the name of the model, a photo to see what she looks like, her height, and links to her videos at the site. That's it. No personal information to connect to the model.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
In spite of minor faults, I think the network is worth joining.
There are better sites to join for your money's worth, such as Adult Time or Metart or Femjoy.
But if you have extra cash, New Sensations is a worthwhile join.
Wait for a holiday discount where you can join for $60/year.
The listed membership price is $119.95/year, with a PU discount the price is $95.40, but the $60/year price is offered throughout the year during holidays.
There are 12 exclusive sites in the New Sensations network, plus over 7,500 exclusive hardcore videos, in definitions ranging from 720p to 4K. Each definition is offered in 2 different mbps formats (video bitrates).
You watch a lot of porn, it's normal for the videos and galleries to lose their effect. But sometimes you can find a new model or new video that is fresh and worth viewing, and that makes the membership price worth paying. I found several models and videos that were more than enjoyable at the network.
I have read reviews by PU members that complain about the sameness of the content, that it's not fresh or interesting. But that's a complaint about almost any porn site.
The best bang for your buck is a mega-site like Adult Time for hardcore porn. Or Metart for softcore galleries.
Giving New Sensations a score of 89. It's a fine network, and they update the network weekly with new videos and galleries.
The qaulity is good to excellent.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the teen network 18Videoz.
You get access to the entire 18Videoz network. No sites require a premium membership.
-The models at the site are basically young teens (18 to early 20s). Most of them are attractive to very attractive. They are from Eastern Europe, almost all white, slender to medium build. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos.
-The public page does a good job showing you the kinds of models at this site. The thumbnails are approximately 3"x4" on a 27" monitor. The thumbnails are brightly lit.
-The site is currently updating.
-Recent videos are offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Photosets have around 56+ photos per set.
Cons:
-Very little information about the site or network from the public pages. You can't get an idea of the update rate for the site or network. You can't get any idea of how many videos a model has, or an overview of the model listing.
-The videos are slightly disappointing. In spite of the cute girls, many of the older videos seem low-rent. The sets are mainly a room in a cheap apartment, the video usually seems like it was filmed cheaply. The videos often seem to have a film over the lens that makes the images seem un-vivid (not sharp, vibrant colors and flesh tones and immediacy--you are seeing images in a very slight fog, almost).
Bottom Line:
I should note that over the last few years the network and site have tried to improve the video quality with better sets, better costumes, better lighting.
Having said that, if you compare Teeny Lovers and the 18Videoz network with the Wow network, the Wow network gives you a higher quality experience.
Comparing the Teeny Lover site and the 18Videoz network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the quality of the videos at the Wow network is a better value experience.
Wow network videos have nicer sets, better videography, better overall lighting, that make you really appreciate how physically attractive the models can be.
The 18Videoz network has plenty of physically attractive teen models, but the videos and photosets don't showcase their beauty. Which is a shame.
The Teen Lovers site has a zip file for each photoset. But in only 1 definition.
The Wow network photosets have your choice of 4 definitions for each photoset.
18 Videoz photos download in sets with photos that are 1666 pixels x 2500 pixels, which would seem to indicate superior quality. But looking at the individual photos, there is often a focus issue with the photos, and the photos don't have the vibrant colors of the Wow network photos.
The photosets at the Wow network are so much better:
Better colors. You choice of 4 definitions for the zip file photoset.
Better focus of the photos. Nicer sets. The models just appear more attractive and appealing.
18Videoz and Wow network often run special discounts.
You can often find 18Videoz network for $60/year.
You can often find Wow network for $60/year. Or for $70/year. I'm currently paying $70/year for a Wow network sub, but I hope to remember to cancel before it re-bills and start a new sub at $60/year.
A few years ago I was paying $120/year for the 3 Wow network sites, plus a separate fee for the Ultra Films site.
You now get Ultra Films and the 3 Wow network sites in a subscription to any one of the sites.
Note: Porn sites normally do not reward members for loyalty. They will often give new members a lower membership price than recurring members. And most porn sites, when you renew your membership, will gladly charge you your higher recurring price than emails or other offers of a lower membership price.
So it pays to shop around to see what the lowest price is for a membership to a porn site.
I was paying $120 for the Wow network, and, I'm not positive, at least $60 or more for the Ultra Films site. Until I cancelled and renewed for $70 for all 4 sites.
I think 18 Videoz and the Teeny Lovers are good teen site.
But I think the Wow network + Ultra Films is a better experience. The videos and photosets are better quality. And if you can find an email for $60/year for the Wow network (which includes Ultra Films, even though Ultra Films is not listed as part of the Wow network), I would jump on it.
Wow network has lovely young teens expressing the joy of sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $19.99/month recurring. However, look for holiday specials where the price can drop to $10 for the first month, or even lower. As a member of the MetArt network, I found an offer for $4.99 for the first month, rebilling monthly at $19.99.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the best customer services for any porn site. The only one better is the fame aid customer service, which has a live chat line that is 24/7, and answers questions within minutes. The MetArt customer service usually answers questions within a few hours, by email.
-The content is exclusive. Note: Staff Selections are exclusive to the MetArt network, but not to any one site in the network. Staff Selections are a premium item that has to be purchased separate from your regular membership.
-The models are mainly white, Eastern European. Most of the models are familiar from the other MetArt network sites. The models range from attractive to lovely. This is one of the strengths of the MetArt network:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
how attractive the models are: however, the competing sites, like MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty and other fine photo sites also have a strong catalog of lovely models.
-On the initial signup to any of the sites in the MetArt network, you are offered a chance to sign up to different sites in the network for $19/month, $90/year, $400 for a lifetime membership.
If you are a real fan of one of the sites, one of those offers might be worth considering.
However:
-On a personal level, a lifetime membership is not worthwhile for me. On a realistic basis, since my health is not good, and I'm over 70, even $400 is not a worthwhile investment. I do have a lifetime membership to MetArt and a couple of other MetArt sites, that I paid for years ago.
If you're much younger, and you really enjoy one of these sites, a lifetime membership for $400 might be worth considering. Especially to MetArt, which has a massive catalog of photosets, a daily update rate of 4 sets,
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
plus 6 sets on the first day of each month. MetArt, because of the massive catalog of photosets (and a large collection of videos, most of those videos are boring, in spite of how attractive the model might be), the large update rate, the fine technical features of the site (offering zip files in 3 definitions for each gallery, a good photoplayer to watch a gallery online, 24/7 excellent customer service, clean navigation, etc.) is the best site in the MetArt network. However, it's a softcore glamour site, emphasizing photos, which might be too bland, not hard-core enough for some PU members.
There was an announcement at the MetArt network:
30 Apr, 2020
Attention Lifetime Members, we have retroactively upgraded your lifetime membership to grant you full access to all Staff Selections.
If you carry a lifetime membership, you can now stream or download all past and future Staff Selections.
I'm a lifetime member to MetArt, SexArt, and The Life Erotic.
However, on a practical basis, access to Staff Selections doesn't hold a lot of value for me.
I don't think the Staff Selections are rare jewels compared to the normal updates at these sites.
That's my opinion, anyway.
I never paid to view or download any previous staff selections.
And I think the staff selections are basically hype, which I don't buy into.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The last time I joined (about 1 year ago) they didn't have a pre-checked cross-sale, but this time they did. Pre-checked cross-sales are common for the porn industry, but I believe they are a poor marketing gimmick. If you miss the cross-sale notice, you will be signed up to a short term trial that can turn into a very expensive monthly membership unless you cancel the trial almost immediately.
-Also I unchecked the remember me box. This allows the site to keep your credit card data. Too many sites have been hacked for financial information. So it's a bad idea to leave your credit card information at too many sites, because you are just increasing the chances your credit cards will be hacked. I've had several credit cards accounts hacked over the years, with charges made to the accounts from fraudsters. Some charges were made from Africa, some from states in the United States I've never visited. I've never been to Africa. Credit card fraud it pervasive. Try to reduce the places that keep your credit card details.
-I got a confirming email on signup. This was important.
The confirming email was poor.
It confirmed that my account was active with Errotica Archives.
The confirming email did not show the membership price for the first month, or the montly rebill price.
The email did not name the biller for the transaction.
The signup page showed "ECHST.NET 866-452-5108".
From Google, ECHST.NET is a payment processor.
However, the member page at the Errotica-Archives site states my payment processor is RocketGate.
CCBill and Epoch are the gold standards of payment processors.
It would have been nice if I had been able to choose the payment processor.
The member page at the Errotica-Archives site does not show the monthly membership price, either the first or succeeding months.
Separately, the confirming email was important:
On the join page when signing up, you enter a password for your membership.
The password for my membership on the confirming email was a different password.
That is the first time that's ever happened to me, in over 100 porn memberships, over 20 years of porn memberships. That I was given a different password from the site, instead of the password that I entered. (The password that I entered met the stated password requirements of the site.)
You might think some of the cons are trivial. But if I hadn't gotten the confirming email, I would have had to contact customer service to try to enter the site.
And it would have been nice for the confirming email to show the last 4 digits of the credit card I used.
Along with the first and continuing monthly membership price.
-They advertise daily updates. The average update rate has been 2 updates per week for a year or more.
-Regional discrimination. PU members (outside the US) have complained that the site charges more for a membership than US members are charged. I don't know if this is due to the site or the payment processor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Models: 806.
Galleries: 4,510
Number of photos per gallery: 50 - 100.
Contributing photographers: 73.
Photosets have a zip for low, medium and high definition.
Films: 652
This is basically a photography site. The last video update was around June 2018.
That does not include the "staff selections". They tell you if you buy a staff selection, you "own" it. But that is a marketing ploy.
There is no DRM for MetArt network sites. So you "own" all the videos and photosets at the network (except for the "staff selections").
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/mo.
-I didn't see a cross-sale on the join page.
That would be a pro. Unless I was sloppy, and did not see a cross-sale on the join page.
On the confirmation email, there was no mention that I joined a cross-sale.
So I will have to check my credit card for the next month, to see if I was charged for a cross sale joi
-Site is part of the MetArt network. For most joins, you join each site separately. However, there is a special deal where you get a discounted price if you join 10 sites MetArt runs for about $50/month, recurring monthly. I used to see that advertised, but it's been a while since I've seen it recently.
-Many or most of the models are regulars on the MetArt network. This means the standard level of attractiveness of the models is good to excellent.
-As part of the MetArt network, the site features the high level of technical features standard for the MetArt network:
Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Unlimited streaming of videos.
For videos:
You can choose the streaming definition: 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p.
You can choose the file download definition: 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p.
For photosets:
-You have your choice of low, medium or high for an online slideshow.
-You have the same choices for downloading a file of the photoset in low, medium or high definition.
-Customer service is excellent: fast to respond, usually helpful with password problems, billing, whatever.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a fine site, part of the excellent MetArt network of glamour sites.
-The default biller was rocketgate. I've used them before, with no problems. But CCBill and Epoch are more widely known, so more trusted to easily cancel your membership.
-You immediately get a confirming email on joining. The email gives your username and password.
But no details on the credit card used, the membership prices, or the name of the biller.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-A random password is assigned to you, even if you have other memberships in the MetArt network. This is a problem, because the MetArt network has a software program that checks if you have more than one active membership with the network.
Edit: I tried logging in to a MetArt site, and got a popup stating:
"The MetArt Network is rolling out a more feature rich user experience to all our members. In order to do this, we need your help.
We have detected that you have multiple login credentials. We need you to choose a single username, display name, and email address so you can have one login across all sites."
So, they are trying to make life easier, by requiring a single username etc. Then why the heck didn't they just assign me the same login details I already had on my other MetArt memberships?
(This is really picky on my part. But in the past, when I used the process to adjust my login details to a single instance, I got locked out of the MetArt network until customer service fixed the problem.)
Since the notice is automatic, it blocks me from accessing any of my MetArt memberships, except access to the MetArt site itself.
(I currently have separate memberships to 5 of the MetArt sites.)
Thank you, MetArt, for blocking me from my membership sites.(That comment was supposed to be sarcasm.)
-The last update to the videos was July 01, 2018. So they no longer post new videos.
(I am ignoring the video titled "Anal Yoga" with model Lara A. This video is labelled a "staff selection", and you have to pay an extra fee to view or download it. Also, there is no posting data on the video.
The staff selection videos were an idea of making some videos at Erotic Archives require an extra fee to view or download.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
652 videos.
I'm not sure if those are the free videos that come with a membership to the site, or if that number includes the staff videos that each require a separate payment to view or download.
4401 galleries.
757 models.
73 contributing photographers.
-Years ago, if you were a member of any of the MetArt sites, you could get a discounted membership (around $10/month) to any of their other sites. But that was years ago. Today, if you are a member of one of their sites, and you go to the membership page listing their sites, they offer to charge you full price for a membership to any of their other sites.
You are much better off using a PU discount to join any MetArt site, because the prices are cheaper.
Or you can wait for a holiday special, when the prices are often discounted even more.
I joined Errotica Archives for $4.95 for the first month, on a holiday special.
So if you look around, there are specials to MetArt and many of the other sites in their network, during the holidays.
MetArt used to be a soft, softcore site. In recent years, they are trying to put a slightly harder edge on their content: however, the site is still basically a soft, softcore site. MetArt features nude photography. There is no hardcore action. Most photosets and videos at MetArt are solo girls.
There is a small percentage of content with 2 or more girls. No males allowed (except for the photographers doing the shooting).
The last few years, MetArt does allow the models to suggest a bit of eroticism, where the girl or girls (if there is more than one girl in the set) can touch herself or touch the other girl, but it's a very mild form of suggested masturbation.
-Errotica Archives is a glamcore site in the MetArt network that follows the same guidelines: soft, soft eroticism. The models are allowed to touch themselves, but it's the softest form of eroticism: the main element of eroticism is the model undressing and allowing her body to be viewed. Yes, the model might touch herself, but gently. So there there might be a hint of masturbation: but only the softest form of masturbation. No sticking the fingers inside her pussy, no harsh moans or groans of sensual satisfaction. This is strictly soft, softcore eroticism.
And definitely no boys allowed (men are dirty creatures who might tempt these tender creatures into forbidden sexual acts).
If you want actual sex, you need to visit one of the other MetArt sites, such as Sex Art, or ALS Scans.
So if you are fan of excellent softcore photography of beautiful women, Erotica Archives might fit you. They stopped updating their videos over 1 year ago. But I've never been a fan of softcore videos: I enjoy softcore photos of beautiful women, but almost always find softcore videos boring instead of erotic. No matter how beautiful the models might be.
There are too many factors that can ruin the fantasy in a video: a photo or series of photos of a beautiful women is easier to constuct an arousing image in your own mind.
Giving the Errotica Archives site a score of 89.
For the same price, you get far more content at MetArt, which swamps the Errotica Archive site in terms of backlog of photosets, number of models, and in the updates.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The network gets multiple weekly updates.
-The video quality of the scenes is good to excellent: good videography, clear visuals and good colors, costumes are acceptable, not cheap, ragged clothes. The acting is better than average by the models.
-The membership price is low: The list price is $149.95/year, but there is a PU discount of $95.40/year, but $60/year is offered at holiday specials throughout the year.
-No download limits.
-No streaming limits.
-You can stream or watch the videos in a variety of definiitions. The newer videos from the last several years are available from 360p through 4K.
-There is a story for most videos, that add meaning to the scene. This is an improvement over the stupid plots shown at many teen porn sites where the plots involve parodies of horny teens fucking under the unsuspecting presence of their step-parents.
-The videos and photo sets have a posting date.
Cons:
-The biggest con is the site stopped updating in 2018. I don't know why, because I thought it was one of the better sites in the network. My guess is they didn't want to put the time and effort into making story-driven videos, although the other sites in the network also feature story-driven videos, but with flimsier plots.
-The network is divided into sites. But many videos don't clearly show what site the video belongs to.
For example, if you select a video, it might take a while of searching before you can decide what site the video belongs to.
This makes navigating the sites more difficult.
-Adds take up a lot of space in the member pages. Before you enter the member's area, you are hit with a page of ads.
Get past the introductory add page into the member's area, and there are ads on every member page.
-The search function is clunky. You entre "Amber Moore" in the search box that states "Search By Model Name", it returns an alphabetical listing of the letters in the alphabet,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED);
along with 15 thumbnails of random models that are both male and female.
The next step is to click on the letter "A" in the listing (A is the first letter in Amber Moore's name), and that brings up another 15 thumbnails of both male and female models, whose names might start with A, but probably won't start with A.
You click on the letter A again, and this time, it returns 15 models, both male and female, that start with the letter A.
The model names are not listed alphabetically. So you have to check each model to see if the model name "Amber Moore" appears in the listing.
A very clunky search box. Built by a programmer who either forgot his programming lessons, or didn't bother to learn them in the first place.
-The models page is poor. It might list one or two of the video content of the model, but it can often leave out her other content at the network. For example, the Amber Moore model page lists "Daddy's Favorite #3 - INTERVIEWS" and "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite", but it leaves out 4 of her other videos at the network.
BOTTOM LINE(START of):
I think that for a low price(the $60/year holiday special price), you get access to a lot of good quality porn.
The models are mainly attractive teens in their late teens and twenties.
The videos and photo sets are professionally shot, with clear, crisp images, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
The plots, while not oscar-worthy, are better than the stupid parodies or non-plots used at many teen porn sites.
I'm giving the site a score of 89.
This is based on a price of $60/year.
I wouldn't pay $90/year or higher, because there are other fine sites that, for a more expensive price, give you a better experience for your porn dollars: Better navigation, a more extensive listing of models, slightly better photo quality. The photo and video quality at the New Sensations network and its sites, is good, but it is below the quality found at Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine-art sites.
However, the New Sensations Network is hardcore porn with an emphasis on videos, and the sites I mentioned (Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios) are mainly softcore porn.
I think any one of the New Sensations network sites is worth joining for $60, because if you join any one of the sites in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network, without paying extra.
And you get unlimited streaming and downloading, without paying extra.
But I would hesitate about paying $90 or more for a yearly sub. There are sites where you get more bang for your buck.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to around 30 different sites.
Most of those sites are teen oriented.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. Unlimited downloads is becoming rare for porn sites.
-Videos from the last few years are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p, in MP4 format.
Sometimes, the 720p or 1080p definition might be missing.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-Segpay was the default biller for me. Not as well known as Vendo or CCBill, but I've had no problems with Segpay.
-Limited information given for the models.
Bottom Line:
Network stats:
Total Girls: 1314
Total Photos: 1,332,666
Total Videos: 12,248
Total Content: 13,776.64 Gbs
Watching the first video with Lisa and Camille, it's just a simple, honest-to-God piece of enjoyable teen hardcore. Lisa is a petite, long-legged, energetic cutie. She's not beautiful, but she is fucking attractive, and she does a wonderful job snogging the stunt cock and lesbo-playing with her attractive female roommate at the same time. This is not glamcore sex like you find at X-Art (which stopped updating around November 2022, and will probably soon vanish into internet heaven). The videos are more like you will find at Teen Mega World, and not as glossy as the videos at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
If you get a holiday special, you can join for 12 months for around $90, which includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. A lot of porn sites are either charging extra for limited downloads, or eliminating downloads altogether. So the price is right for joining.
I enjoy the simple plots of the videos. For two main reasons:
The simple plot requires very little acting on the part of the models and the stunt cock, so it doesn't tax their limited acting talents.
The simple plot, once you accept that the models and the stunt cock are playing horny young teens who want to fuck, avoids the cringe-worthy plots shown at many hardcore teen sites, that showcase empty-headed teens who fuck and suck in front of their step-relations (step siblings, step mother, step father). I know that these empty-headed teens are supposed to be a parody, but the plots and actions are so stupid it interferes with my appreciating the hardcore video action.
The quality of the videos is good to very good: good camera-work, good lighting, good skin tones (which is helpful, since you can really appreciate how attractive these teen models are), good sound control, OK sets (not the cheap apartments many teen porn sites start out using at first).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the New Sensations network. Site contents (and network contents) is exclusive, as far as I can tell.
-The videos and photosets are professionally produced: Excellent technical production values: clear, crisp images, nice sets, nice costumes (mainly ordinary clothes, but not cheap clothes), excellent lighting and sound control.
-Multiple definitions and multiple bit rates for each video.
-There are many attractive models at the site and network, that make the site a worthwhile join. Elsa Jean, Lena Anderson, Amber Moore, Ivy Wolfe, Kenna James, Blake Eden, Riley Reid, Charlotte Stokely are some of my favorites.
-You get over 7500 videos at the network.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
Cons:
-Poor search box. You put in a model's name, and the hits are random.
Even though the model is featured at the site and network, the search often returns a bunch of different models, but not the one you're looking for. Worthless.
A different way of searching for a particular model is to look under the first letter of her first name. But although the return page lists models with that first letter, the names are not listed alphabetically, so you might have to look through 4 or 5 pages before you find your model. Why not put the names of the models in alphabetical order?
-The site has a very slow update rate. The first video was posted 05/23/2013. It's now 03/08/23, almost 10 years later. The site has 157 videos.
So it averages 16 videos per year.
-I've been experiencing failed downloads at the network. It might be my computer. But the failed downloads don't automatically resume, so I have to delete the failed files and re-start from the beginning.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
The videos try to give some meaning to the sex with a plot. Which can be worthwhile. After a while, you can get tired of two or more bodies slapping against each other, if that's all the meaning of the sex.
Here's a sentimental story of 2 young girls finding each other:
It Started With A Kiss For Riley and Elsa: Starring Riley Reid and Elsa Jean
The world needs love. Evil forces from Russia are invading Ukraine and killing innocent men, women and children.
That's why it essential to find some happiness.
And The Lesbian Experience can provide uplifting videos.
Elsa Jean is a sweet, innocent woman-child who dreams of having sex with her attractive roommate. Dreams are not enough, and masturbation is only a stopgap measure. When Riley returns home, Jean makes a move on Riley, and their love blossoms.
This is such a sweet story. It restores your faith in humanity.
-The site teaches valuable life lessons. First, even though a Hitachi wand can be used to achieve orgasm, it doesn't compare to the feel of a lovely young female partner: Something about a real human partner puts it above a mechanical toy.
Some of the videos are model interviews. Some of the girls come across as real human beings. And most of them are very young, 18 to early 20s. They're trying to have fun and make a bit of money. Most porn starlets last only a few years before dropping out of the business. I assume you need a teflon skin to survive as a porn starlet.
The Lesbian Experience posted their first video on 05/23/2013, starring Dani Daniels and Mia Malkova. They offered 720p and 1080p definitions, in multiple bit rates for each definition. You could stream or download the videos. They also offered a photoset, viewable online or in a zip file for download. The photoset had 88 photos, with real photos, not screenshots. The photos are not glamour style, more like home photography style. The girls are attractive, but little effort is made to make them look as attractive as possible. The gallery is best used as a reminder of what the video looks like. So even though the models can be attractive, they are not presented as attractively as possible, and I wouldn't collect most of these galleries.
Site started offering 4K videos in 2018.
I really enjoyed watching some of the videos at The Lesbian Experience. You get a lot of lovely or attractive young models to view, and the stories are simple but a cut above the stupid parodies featured at many porn sites.
Whether you think the site and network is worth a longer membership is strictly personal. But if you can find a $60/year membership, offered throughout the year, I think the site and network is worth joining. Because some of the videos can be hot. And there are plenty of young models to enjoy in living color that is crisply filmed.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content. I believe the content is basically 100% exclusive. I've joined a lot of teen porn sites, and I've never seen any of the Young Sex Parties videos at other sites (except for tube sites, which seem to have a smattering of most teen porn sites in edited versions).
-Low membership price. You can get an annual membership for $60/year, with a PU discount. The listed price is $120/year.
Join through the PU link to 18 Videoz, which opens the offer to join at $60/year when you hit the join link. Or you can join for $15 for the first month, with a PU discount.
Joining the YoungSexParties.com directly, even using the PU link, shows a price of $120/year or $30/month, so don't join Young Sex Parties directly; instead, join through the PU 18 Videoz link, which gives you the lower prices.
-Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network of around 18 sites. There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The network updates with 1 new video and photoset around 5 or 6 times a week. With covid slowing porn production, that's pretty good.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Videos offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. That's both for streaming and downloads. The older videos don't have the 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Comparing the quality of the site/network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films), to the 18 Videoz network, this is defintely a step down.
The Wow network gives you a catalog of cute to lovely teen models that are filmed in high quality videos and high quality photosets. And the Wow models are cute to lovely, and would qualify to appear at any softcore glamor site such as Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, whatever.
The models at Young Sex Parties aren't up to the Wow network standards, but they are mainly attractive. You wouldn't kick any of these girls out of your bed, if you were lucky enough to snag one.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The sets at Young Sex Parties are less expensive than the Wow network sets. The lighting and filming and colors are not as vibrant and exciting as the Wow network standards.
Don't get me wrong: the Young Sex Parties videos are definitely watchable. It's just that they are step below what the Wow network offers.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site has 272 videos
Each video has an accompanying photoset.
Photosets average around 60 to 80 photos or screenshots.
Personally, I don't think the photosets are worth collecting, unless you're a real fan of some model, because the photos (and screenshots) are not high quality, and don't present the models that attractively, even when the model is naturally attractive.
The videos at Young Sex Parties fall under the "Reality Porn" category. The plots are basically very simple. They don't feature the stupid dialog and parody style of many porn sites. Instead, you get one or more teen girls, mainly attractive, one or more teen guys, passable looks, and they look at each other, touch each other, and start to fuck and suck. Not a lot of dialog. Not a lot of motivation, except the girls are horny, and the guys are horny, so that's the plot (internal horniness leads to sex).
I much prefer this simple plot to the stupid plots and stupid dialog featured at many hardcore teen sites.
(The Wow network gives better plots that aren't stupid. And you can sometimes catch a special discount to the Wow network for $60 or $70 per year, which a great price for an excellent teen network.)
The Nubiles Porn network also offers a ton of attractive teen models in high quality videos and photosets that are superior to what the 18 Videoz network/sites offer.
If you wait for a holiday discount, you can join the Wow network for around $63/year or $70/year (through one of their email offers, if you sign up for their weekly newsletter).
That gives you access to their 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films.
You can join Young Sex Parties through their 18 Videoz network for $60. Joining Young Sex Parties directly, which gives you the same access, costs $120/year.
I definitely think the Wow network is a better choice over 18 Videoz.
The Wow network content is better:
The models are more attractive, the videos are higher quality: crystal clear videos, excellent quality photosets that are worth collecting, better sets, better editing.
The price of membership to Wow network is close to the price of 18 Videoz network.
But if you have the extra money, I think the Young Sex Parties and 18 Videoz network is worth joining.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. A fine teen hardcore network with first-class production videos and easy navigation.
-A lot of cute young teen and early-20s models. You find young cuties at many teen sites on the internet, but it's good to know that Covid has not stopped these attractive young girls from making good to fine content for us porn users
-The network has around 19 sites. Out of 19 sites, 7 are still updating. The Step Siblings Caught site has an irregular update rate, anywhere from 1 to 4 updates per month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Don't have to pay extra for downloads; many other sites are now charging extra for downloads.
-The photosets of the videos are worth collecting. These are real photos, not screencaps, and the photos have attractive models, good colors and lighting, nice sets, good focus.
-The player to stream/play the photosets online is fast and and easy to use.
Cons:
-Lots of ads. First page you see when logging in is a page full of ads. Then you get ads on every member page. Ads are part of almost any porn site, but since you paid for a membership, sometimes you get tired of ads and want to see what you paid for. Did I really pay to see ads, or am I just too immature to realize ads are part of life and to get past that?
-As a suggestion, if you are going to list lots of sites I might join, why not show the membership prices? I'm not going to click on the site name, just to find what the membership price is: if the price is really low, show it to me. Otherwise, stop wasting my time.
Bottom Line:
-Site theme is faux incest: sex between step relatives. This is one of the more popular niches in the last few years. It's supposed to be more thrilling or more perverted if you think the people having sex are related by marriage. I guess I'm getting jaded by watching porn, but the idea of faux incest doesn't rock my boat.
-The vibe of the videos and photosets is teens having sexy fun. It's straight hardcore, no romance, not much petting before the sex, just horny kids fucking. The girls are usually the aggressors, the stunt cocks are teen boys (or early 20s) who are playing shy or backward who are pulled into pleasing the girls. So there's supposed to be an element of comedy in the videos, which gets old fast.
The main pluses of the site (and the network) are:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is uniformly high. A lot of cute young girls at the site. And the older female models are mainly attractive as well.
-The technical quality of the videos is fine to excellent: clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and sound control, nice sets, nice costumes (the costumes are mainly street clothes, but regular street clothes, not cheap clothes). So it's a quality product.
The main negatives of the site (and the network) are:
-I wish they would get rid of the sophomoric attempts at humor and go for a more realistic vibe, or one where the girls aren't air-head nymphos seducing backward stunt cocks.
But the cute models keep me coming back for more.
Giving the site a score of 88.
Mainly because of the cute models. But the videos, apart from the stupid plots, are worth watching for the visuals. And you get network access to a boatload of fine teen models.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Focuses on solo girls peeing.
-Quality site for this niche.
-Rabbits Reviews (a sister site to PU) has discounted memberships to the Wet and Puffy network of:
$9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month)
$60 for the first year
$199.95 lifetime membership
-Navigation is easy.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-320p through 1080p videos. They advertise 4K is available, but I haven't seen them at this site. Maybe at another site in the network?
-Downloads/streams to PCs and mobile devices.
-Weekly updates.
-Cam shows.
-5 sites are included in your membership:
Wet & Puffy; Wet and Pissy; We Like To Suck; Eurobabe Facials; Simply Anal.
-The videos are good quality: nice sets, good camera work, nicely focused, well lit, good colors on the skin tones and the entire shot, good sound control.
Cons:
-The models range from plain or unattractive to some that are attractive. But the general level of the models' attractiveness is below the standards of most teen sites.
-Login details (username and password) are computer generated.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Pissing is the main focus, almost the only focus. of the site. No b/g, no g/g. So if you're not into pissing, the site would have limited appeal.
Bottom Line:
Stats:
Most videos run about 30 minutes.
Video definition from 320p through 1080p.
There is a low quality and a high quality zip file for each photoset, that is a record of the video.
The site theme is solo women pissing. I think piss smells bad, and it seems like an un-hygenic thing to rub piss on yourself, or piss on a furniture or the floor, or to drink or lick piss. But the models at this site are moaning and groaning like pissing is enough to get them off, without a male or female partner needed.
So if you're into pissing as a fetish (not painful or sadistic pissing, but pleasurable pissing), this site is for you. Because that's what the videos feature: lots of solo girls pissing, and rubbing the piss on their bodies, and drinking it, with lots of noise to show how wonderful the piss is when they rub it on themselves, or when they drink it.
But the girls can bring out a dildo, after they've been playing with their piss, to reach a higher orgasm. I guess the combination of piss and masturbation is the perfect combo for these girls. Because they've been pissing and stopping, pissing and stopping, but they manage to piss even more after masturbating with a dildo,
Watching these videos reminds me of the song, "Cry me a river", except in this case, it's more like "Piss me a river". The amount of piss these girls make is tremendous. I wonder if they use some device that makes water flow from the girls' pussies. That would help with the smell, and make the drinking and rubbing more hygenic, and the clean-up easier.
Because you have to watch a few of these videos to believe how much water/piss is coming out of a girl's pussy during a single 30 minute video.
I take diuretic pills (also called water pills) for health reasons, prescribed by my medical doctor. So I often have to pee every few hours (even at night, which wakes me up when my bladder is full). But I can't pee anywhere near what these girls are peeing.
They are younger than me, don't have my health problems, so I can understand they can pee more.
But not in the quantities of pee that seems to flow in a single 30-minute session. I couldn't pee that much in several days. I mean, it just flows, stop, flows again, stops, flows again, then flows some more, in small and large amounts.
So I'm suspicious that some of the "pee" is really water, coming from some hidden device.
Which might hurt the fantasy.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
The site is heaven for pee fetishists.
Site structure makes for easy navigation.
Videos are professionally shot, excellent camera work, nice settings, excellent lighting and sound control and colors.
Photosets come in a zip file of two definition: regular and high definition.
I wish the models were more attractive. But that's a personal preference. Some PU members might disagree with my preferences, and think the models are very attractive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: this review is based on the Adult Time channel of My Pervy Family.
There is a separate site for My Pervy Family, that is has more content than the My Pervy Family channel at Adult Time. But the stand-alone My Pervy Family is basically a streaming-only site. You can buy downloads at the My Pervy Family site, but that becomes very expensive. And the streaming-only membership is not cheap to begin with: See the bottom line section of this review for more details on why the My Pervy Family site is expensive.
-Video definition runs from 160p or 288p through 2160p.
-The sets are nice and clean: no low-rent apartments, normal clothes. Good lighting.
-There is a plot or story to the videos: it's like POV, you're watching these people interact with each other. It's not all sex, it's also people living together, trying to get along. The sex is the main selling point, of course, but the stories can be interesting or funny.
-Support is FameSupport, one of the finest support teams.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Support is 24/7. With live chat, email, telephone.
I recommend the live chat option, fast response.
-Videos download with default filename of title, model, definition. You only have to add channel and posting date.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
-Payment processor is proprietary, part of fameaid, but it's a solid processor, and I've dealt with them for years and never had a problem.
-My Pervy Family uses a POV filming style, which can be jumpy. My guess is they need a more professional guy at the camera, or a better editor.
-There is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads. Which is a huge amount of data to download in a single day.
-No text description of the video. No tags to describe the video (for search or sort).
-There's so much content at Adult Time, that navigating the channel and network can have problems. They really need to have an expert re-design the network to make navigation easier. They keep adding, not just new content to each channel,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
but new channels as well. They are more focused on creating a massive porn network instead of making the content easier to find and use. The network was massive almost from the beginning when it was first created, and it's like a fucking monster that is spreading its tentacles in all directions, without a basic structure that is easy to use. Trying to get a simple chronlogical listing of the contents of each channel is a task for an expert: I would use the network more if I could find the content I want to see more easily.
-No bio on the models.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
PU and TBP sites show a discounted price of $24.99/month and $99.99/year for the My Pervy Family site.
But if you use the links from PU and TBP to go to the My Pervy Family site, the join page shows $24.99/month and $75/6 months. And that is for streaming only.
Downloads cost extra, and you have to pay for each download, there is no upgrade for unlimited downloads.
If you join Adult Time, you have unlimited streaming and downloads for the My Pervy Family channel.
The Adult Time channel for My Pervy Family has most of the video content of the My Pervy Family site.
So unless you are a real fan of the My Pervy Family site, the better choice is to join Adult Time, and you get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads of most of the My Pervy Family videos.
Plus you get a boatload of additional hardcore porn that is very high quality with an Adult Time membership.
Note: Adult Time does have a streaming-only membership, for a lower price. But I recommend joining Adult Time with the yearly term, because I believe Adult Time is one of the best bargains in hardcore porn today.
I am an especial fan of the Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time, I think it's the finest plot-driven porn site on the internet. Pure Taboo features twisted desires with a cinematic approach, with high production values and excellent acting for a porn site.
I did a review of the Filthy POV channel of Adult Time. That channel features twisted sex, with a trailer-trash approach. You compare Filthy POV channel with the Pure Taboo channel, and it's like comparing Ptomaine Tommy to Filet Mignon. Or if you're too young to understand the reference, it's like comparing rotting meat to fine cuisine. Pure Taboo is high class twisted-desire porn.
If you're on a budget, or even if you have plenty of cash to throw into porn, joining Adult Time to get access to most of the My Pervy Family videos, instead of joining the My Pervy Family site itself, seems like a no-brainer to me. The advantages of the My Pervy channel include lower membership price, downloading privileges, and access to a huge supply of high quality hardcore porn from the Adult Time network.
What are the main benefits of the My Pervy Family channel:
-In a world filled with pain, the channel focuses on the love between step-relatives, creating a warm feeling of how you can become a better person by caring for your loved ones.
Piper June is a young teen who feels insecure about her small boobs. But her step-brother feels her titties and says they are fine. Later, he plays with her pussy and shoots his load over her. Leaving both the brother and step-sister satisfied.
Or Melody Marks, a lovely young model with girl-next-door looks. She has a good-looking step-brother who's back from college. The next morning, he wakes her up and they talk on her bed, he's sleepy, she's missed him so much, so they start cuddling. Then kissing. Then it's not enough, and she's on top of him, and she wants more, a lovely girl, a handsome guy, one of the best scenes in the channel.
I'm giving My Pervy Family a score of 88. The models are cute teens or early twenties (as step-daughters, but you get young-old with the step-mother, step-father sex with the step-children).
The sets are nice. The technical features are good (lighting, sound, etc.). Navigation is just OK, but could be better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site features black models and black men. A special niche, because most sites featuring blacks are white models with black men.
-PU has discounted prices to the All Black X site:
$14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/mo.
$95.40/year.
Note: if you use the PU link to go to the X Empire network, the yearly membership option is $89.95/year.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-Site loads easily.
-Very large thumbnails for video listing of contents, which are really gifs that show you a tiny preview of the action. The Gifs are impressive: large, well-lit images that clearly show you the male and female performers in action.
-Small site (only 37 videos), so the navigation is easy.
-Photosets: can hold anywhere from 100 to 500 photos.
The photos have good focus, good lighting, nice sets, good colors. They are worth collecting.
-I don't have downloading privileges for the videos (I joined on a $5 special for the first month).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But I do have downloading privileges for the photosets, and unlimited streaming for the videos.
-I have access to all 5 sites in the network.
-Support is live chat and email. No telephone support that I could find.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-You can choose your login details (username and password), so it's easy to remember.
-The network models are attractive, and some of them have appeared at other sites, even at Metart sites.
CONS(START OF):
-The site (and network) has a slow, irregular update rate.
The site has 1 update per month.
The network averages 2 updates per week.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 200GB.
That is a minor con, because 200GB is a large amount of data.
-Photos download with a generic file number. You have to manually rename the zip file with the model's name, site name, date posted, title of the set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Only 1 definition zip file for each photoset.
-Although I have access to all 5 sites in the network, I have to login through the site I joined at: entering my login details at other sites in the network gives me an error message.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Membership in the X Empire network gives you access to 5 sites.
All Black X
Dark X Erotica X Hard X
Lesbian X
The All Black X site stats:
Video definition: 288p through 2160p.
Number of videos: 37
Number of models: 33
An individual photoset can hold anywhere from 74 to 500+ photos.
Individual photo details: 1280 x 1920 pixels.
Individual photo resolution: 96 x 96 dpi.
The photos are good quality: real photos, not screencaps.
Almost all of the videos are a black man and a black woman having sex.
There are 2 videos of a woman with 2 men.
There is one video of 2 women with one man.
There is one lesbian video of 2 women.
There are tags to describe the action, and a very short text description of the slender plot. The plot usually goes like this: a female and male met and fuck. Very little setup.
Although they divide the content into 5 sites, the videos themselves don't carry a logo showing what site they belong to. Nor does the short text description tell you what site the video belongs to.
The site shows you how a female prepares to meet a strange male: First she fluffs her hair with her hands, scrubs her teeth with a finger, exposes her breasts so she can tweek her nipples and breasts, covers her breasts back up, and then goes to meet the man.
I plan to install a hidden camera the next time I meet up with a gorgeous woman, to see if this happens in real life.
The site and network is good to excellent.
Network is part of Gamma Entertainment, which owns Adult Time network, but this network (and site) are completely separate from the Adult Time network. It even uses a different billing and support team from Adult Time. I don't know why, because I think the Adult Time billing and support team are excellent.
This is a personal issue: if I didn't have too many porn memberships already, I would spend more time at this site and network.
The photosets and videos are excellent. The style is reality porn, where they have a plot to set up the sex action. The models are attractive, the sets are nice. Not super-glamourous, but very nice locations. The videos are clear and crisp, well videotaped, good lighting, good sound control. The background music is good, not loud or jarring.
This is a small site that probably started about a year ago.
You only have 37 videos so far.
Current update rate is 1 video per month.
Maybe the site will grow faster once the covid epidemic has gone.
This is a personal issue, but I have too many porn memberships at this time. I don't have enough time to spend at this network. The network offers high-quality videos and photosets, with some very attractive models. But there are too many other fine-to-great networks that compete with this network.
I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 88.
If I was new to porn, I could grade it higher.
Maybe I'm jaded, I like the site and network, but there's too much competition from other sites for me to spend much money or time at this network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There is a hot link that allows you to skip the intro section when streaming a video.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There are plenty of attractive models. For example, Stacy Cruz, Julia Red, Zazie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Lovita Fate, Ria Sun, Misha Cross, Anna Rey, Jessica Spielberg, etc.
-The videos are crystal clear. Good lighting, good sound control, good colors, etc.
-The Zazie Skymm video at Bitches Abroad is worth the membership price by itself. She is one fantastic looking woman: lovely face, great body, alabaster skin: a wet dream come true.
Cons:
-There is a limit of 100 videos/month for downloads for the entire network (not per channel, but for the entire network).
-Slow download speeds. Download speeds can drop to 400 KB/sec, so if you're downloading a 36 minute runtime video at 720p, it can easily take 30 minutes or more, which is ridiculous.
-Videos download with the name of the model in the video, but you have to manually add the posting date, the channel, and whatever other information you need.
-I don't know why, but the download links become inactive within a few minutes after logging in to the site. I need to hit the download link to download the video and photoset (if I want the photoset downloaded) immediately upon logging in, or I have to re-start the computer to download anything.
-The channel logs you out within a short time. I've had other networks which left me logged in for hours, but this network logs me out in about 30 minutes (but logs me back in automatically, without having to enter my login details).
Bottom Line:
-Bitches Abroad is part of the Lets Doe It network. Membership in any one of the Lets Doe It channels gives you access to all the other channels in the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
Note: A few years ago, when the Lets Doe It network was called Porn Doe Premium, it used to have 40+ channels. Then they renamed it as Lets Doe It, and reduced the number of channels to around 16 channels, and split the other channels into separate networks that you have to pay extra for. In that sense, what used to be a large network became separate networks that required a lot more money to access.
So if you were a member in the old days, you might have a feeling of being cheated because you no longer have a low-cost membership that gives you access to all the channels in the PornDoe cash channels.
The channel theme for Bitches Abroad is girls who are on vacation and travelling to a different country.
And since this is a porn channel, the girls are horny and ready to fuck and suck with the first stud they meet. Not a lot of romance, just good old hardcore sex. However, since this is part of the Lets Doe It network, the girls are young (late teens, early twenties), and are attractive to fucking gorgeous.
Bitches Abroad has 100 scenes.
Runtime: 20 to 40 minutes.
Video definition: 240p to 1080p.
Unlimited streaming.
100 downloads per month for the entire network.
The photosets are tiny: 13 photos or less per photoset.
The photos in a photoset are actual photos, not screencaps, but since the photosets are a small number of photos, even if the girl is attractive, the photosets are not worth collecting.
There is a zip file for each photoset, but only in 1 definition.
This is definitely not a photography-oriented network.
The major con is that this is an archive site. The last update was Aug 23, 2018, over 2 years ago.
Which is a shame, because the models are attractive European women, and the vacation-travel idea adds a little spice to the sex. Two bodies slapping against each other tends to get tired after a while, even when one of the bodies is a good-looking women. The idea of a girl on vacation in a strange city, meeting a guy, then hooking up with the guy, makes the sex more interesting. Even if there is very little realism in the story: the girl is hot to trot, the guy is ready to fuck, and it's just wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, but at least there's a tiny bit of plot that tries to give meaning to the sex.
-What surprises me is that even the lower definition videos look very good. I downloaded some 480p videos, and to me, they look clear and crisp. I couldn't tell the difference between the 480p videos, and the same videos in 720p or 1080p on a 32" monitor. My laptop is rated for 1080p, and the 32" monitor is new, but the 480p videos really look crisp. Maybe on a super-high definition, large screen monitor the differences in definition would be more visible, but the 480p videos look fine to me. And the 480p videos save a lot of storage space over the higher definition videos.
Actually, when I save photosets from MetArt or other fine photography sites, I normally download the small definition sets, because I can't tell the difference from the higher definition sets (the middle and highest definition sets) on my 27" or 32" monitors. Again, maybe it takes a very large, super-high definition monitor to see the difference. Or you might be able to see the difference in definition if you print the photos with a printer. But there's no sense for me to save the mid- or high-defintion photosets, because the low-definition photosets look just as crisp (when viewing as a slide-show, or a single photo. Only if I zoom in on a photo can I tell the difference between low, middle and high definiton photos. And I rarely zoom in on photos, because I'm not a professional photographer or professional artist, trying to see every detail on a photograph. My objective is to look at pretty women, not trying to study every tiny wrinkle or wart on the model's body.
I'm giving the channel a score of 88.
If they started updating the channel, the score would be higher.
Lets Doe It network has a slow update rate, and Bitches Abroad is an archive channel.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank Wraith0711 for posting a comment that Nubile Films now includes 2 bonus sites:
That Sitcom Show and Hot Crazy Mess.
He's one of those detailed-people who examine a site to see what it has to offer.
I wasn't aware that the bonus sites were added, until he posted the comment.
-I should also thank exotics4me for pointing out that the 2 bonus sites added to Nubile Films were probably added around 2-3 months ago.
-PU discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $29.98/month.
But there is a yearly price of $99.95.
However, if you join through Nubile Films, they have a current discount of $84/year. Nubile Films also has a current discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/month.
So join through Nubile Films, and save a few dollars, if you're going to be around for more than 1 month.
-Login and member pages are https.
-The models are mainly slender white teens, with some black and latina models. There is even at least one Asian model (Lulu Chu).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They don't list the nationality of the models. The models are mainly cute to very attractive. A lot of young honey bunnies that are fucking hot.
-These girls are cute to really cute. Lily Rader, Audrey Grace, Alex Blake, Piper June, Riley Star, Britney Light, Dolly Leigh are just a few of the young teens that grace these videos.
-Videos have a plot to set up the sex. But not a lot of thought is really put into the plot. It's really thin. And the models are not really actors. Except some of the models are so cute it doesn't matter: either they are better actors than I thought, or they are so attractive you're looking at their face and body so hard you're not paying much attention to what they're saying.
-The screenshots download in a zip.
-There is a good description of the plot/action for each video.
-You can tag videos with a favorite label, and save them in a favorites group.
-A lot of the models are petite, around 5' or so. That just adds to their cuteness.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. 67 videos total. Plus matching photosets for each video.
-Last update was 2020-01-03.
That's a shame, because some of these girls are really cute, and I would love to see even more cute girls added. That's probably the biggest con of the site, no more updates.
-The camera is poor POV. The guy holding the camera does not hold it steady, it can move around, which is distracting and irritating.
They should have hired a professional shoot the video. It would have made a nice improvement.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Very little model information. Age, height, country. figure measurements, that's it.
-The video plot descriptions are very detailed, which is good. But reading the descriptions, you start to see the same plot points being repeated. They run out of fresh ideas, and just use the same stories. But since the girls are so cute, you can more or less ignore the plots, and feast on the girls, who can be sweet and sexy and hot as hell.
-Sometimes when they shoot outdoors, the random noise level can be quite high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
-Last video posted 2020-01-03.
-67 videos.
-67 matching photosets.
-Video runtime 20 to 30 minutes.
-Videos can be downloaded in definitions from 270 through 1080p.
-Photosets run around 35 photos per set.
-Each photo is 1920x1080px.
They indicate the photos are screen shots, but they are good quality. I assume there is some excellent software that converts a video into a photoset, because the quality of each screenshot is far superior to what the screenshots were from 10 or 15 years ago.
I examine the photos in a photoset, and I couldn't tell they were screenshots. Most of the photos were very nice. I wish a some of the photos per set were slightly more focused, better definition, because some of these girls are really cute, but many of the screenshots look like real photos. And the screenshots are focused on the action, centered, not just random screenshots that have heads or parts of the body randomly cut off out of the photo.
The photosets are worth keeping.
Maybe I'm just tired at looking at the MetArt and other high quality glamour site photosets, but I am getting slightly bored with many of their recent models. Perhaps it's just me. But the girls at this Hot Crazy Mess site were much more appealing, that I even liked their photosets more than what I like at MetArt. Two different types of content: MetArt is mainly young women, late teens or twenties. Strictly softcore. Glamour-style photos. The girls at Hot Crazy Mess at mainly cute teens doing hardcore sex.
The Hot Crazy Mess models are more desirable than the models at MetArt because they generate more heat.
Britney Light, in the video, "Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1", is a cute young teen. 19 years old. Extremely cute. Soft, tender voice. She's so fuckable. Not an elegant way of putting it, but it's the God damn truth. At least in this video, she is hot and wet and luscious. Not like a porn star, but like a sweet young thing you'd like to pound on for a few hours. If you had the strength and endurance.
Porn is fantasy, but that's what this model makes me think. And quite a few other models at this site.
Whereas, many of the models at MetArt, although absolutely gorgeous, have lately left me cold. Maybe I need to take a break from porn, but the girls at Hot Crazy Mess are really attractive, which I appreciate. That I can find something to like a lot.
Kyler Quinn, in a video at the site titled: "Fuck Thy Neighbor - S5:E6", comes across as a sweet young teen (her age is listed as 20) who broke up with her boyfriend who was cheating on her. So she meets a new neighbor and has sex with him as a rebound fuck.
I don't know what it is: the vibes from these videos are like these are sweet young things, who are having problems, and they are using sex to help with the pain. They are sweet, innocent, not sluts, not porn stars (fantasy, again, remember), who just want to share a moment in time with another human being.
I just enjoy the videos a lot. It's a different vibe, a different atmosphere from glamour or heartcore or gonzo, but a reality-based slice of life where the sweet young thing has a problem, and she is having sex to reduce her pain.
I don't know why, but the videos just appeal to me.
(The models are attractive young women, and the videos are well shot--apart from the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.)
Ella Cruz is another adorable teen model.
I mean, this site has a bunch of lovely teen models, that are just fascinating to watch.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
Pros:
-Fine looking, attractive young models. Could be girl next door types, except they are attractive to very attractive. Not porn sluts.
-Excellent video quality, except for the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.
-Nice sets. But when they shoot outdoors, the noise level can be quite high.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. So you get access to a huge catalog of over 50,000 hardcore videos, photosets, and other goodies.
-21 Naturals has 975 videos, so it's a large channel (the sites at Adult Time are called channels instead of sites).
-Login and member pages are https. So your data is secure, and less prone to hacking, and the ISP record is less invasive (a record is kept of your accessing the network, but not the individual pages you view).
-The models are mainly late teens or early twenties, attractive to very attractive. Mainly white, but a few black.
-The models are enthusiatic and put on a good show. This is boy-girl (or man-woman, if you want to be politically correct) sex.
The action is basic sex: a combination of the guy eating the girl, the girl sucking the guy's cock, vaginal and anal sex.
Not over-the-top gonzo hardcore, but
-There is a zip file for a standard and a high-res photoset.
-The photosets average around 90 photos.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The photos are good quality pics. Not as good as MetArt or MPL Studios photos, but good quality for hardcore action sex. The standard resolution is 1920x1280 pixels. The high-res photo resolution is 5760x3840 pixels.
-Download speeds are good. I get 2-2.5 MB/sec off my WiFi network, which is about my maximum download speed for my WiFi connection. My hardwired Internet speed is supposed to be 200 Mbps, but the WiFi connection is always much slower than a hardwired connection.
-The technical support is first rate, one of the finest I've ever had. There is a live-chat option that is 24/7, and a human person answers almost immediately, within a few minutes. Compare that with my experience trying to talk to a tech support member at Spectrum, my internet provider. I can easily wait 30 to 40 minutes before a human operator comes on the line.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a trailer and the full scene. So the trailer gives you a good idea of what the scene will be, and shows you what the model looks like.
-Videos have a short text description that summarizes the action.
-The channel is updating. It used to be a new video every few days, but since the coronavirus epidemic, the upate rate has slowed to once a week. Which is still fine, because the coronavirus has hit the porn industry really hard, along with entire United States.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are mainly minor. First this is a good channel. Second, and more importantly, it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which is one of the best bargains for hardcore porn on the Internet.
-The zip file for a photoset downloads with a generic numeric filename, so you have to re-name the file to know who the model is, and what the set is. Unless you keep a detailed record listing the numeric filename and all the details of the file, such as model's name, set title, channel, date posted, etc.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Although the navigation is mainly easy, because you have so much content at both the channel and the network, it takes a while before you can easily find the content that fits your taste. If you had less content to look through, it would be easier to find your best material. It's like too much of a good thing takes away from the experience. But that's human nature.
-The canned background music is distracting and reduces the value of the video. Get rid of it.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Channel stats:
Videos: 975
Video runtimes average: 20 to 30 minutes.
Average number of photos in a photoset: around 90
The standard resolution photos: 1920x1280 pixels.
The high-res photo resolution: 5760x3840 pixels.
Videos download with your choice of 160p through 1080p definition.
You can also stream videos in your choice of 160p through 1080p definition.
Unlimited streaming.
Unlimited downloading.
There are some memberships with reduced pricing where it's streaming only, but I think it's worth paying for a membership with downloading.
Site theme: A guy and and a girl decide to fuck. It's that simple.
Pros are that the girls are mainly attractive and enthusiastic for sex.
I think that the models at Wow Girls, Wow Porn and X-Art are, in general, incredibly lovely and are more attractive than the models at 21 Naturals. However, any PU member who was lucky enough to get one of these 21 Naturals girls in his bed would be foolish to kick them out.
A few plot summaries to give you an idea of the type of porn the channel has:
Longing for Each Other 21 Naturals
2020-03-13
Featuring Nata Ocean
Description
Sexy Nata Ocean feels horny and wants a cock to please her wet pussy. Renato offered his hard dick in exchange for some feet caresses.
So the descriptions are useful for giving a bare bones summary of the plot (the plot is basic: a guy and a girl decide to fuck).
"Nextdoor Brat", 21 Naturals, posted 2020-04-03, featuring Julia Red:
Description
Sexy young babe Julia Red is going to her hot neighbor's house with the intent of getting her sweet booty deeply pounded by Thomas. To get his cock ready to slip in her ass she sucks on it until it is well lubricated with her saliva. Thomas then pounds her tushy making Julia moan of intense pleasure. He then finishes by busting all of his love juice straight in her mouth.
So the description is not a love story, but an accurate telling of what the action is.
ANAL DEBUT on 21!!!, 21 Naturals, posted 2017-06-03,featuring Zazie Skymm
Description
On a rainy afternoon blonde sweetheart Zazie Skymm is ready to give her anus for the first time ever to her hung boyfriend Nikki Nuttz. As the rain hits the windows the all natural blondie gets her tight butthole fingered and her pussy eaten at the same time. Feeling her rectum itching for a penis the daring blonde sucks and lubricates the stud's dick. The sodomy session starts slowly as Zazie gets used to the feeling of an erect cock in her anus for the first time, but things get intense fast and she is seen riding the cock with her ass like there is no tomorrow. In the end the lovely nymph will have her anus gaped and her face covered for cum with a definitive desire to do it again soon...
Zazie Skymm is one of the most beautiful models at the channel. Lovely face, great body, she is just lovely and passionate.
I wish she did this video at X-Art or one of the Wow sites, becasue the sky seems overcast, or maybe it's the filter they used, and she deserves better lighting to highlight how attracive she is.
Bottom line: I'm giving the channel a score of 88.
Not only does the channel have 975 videos, but you also get access to the Adult Time channel, which is one of the best bargains in porn today, due to the massive catalog of hardcore videos and the wide range of niches covered, plus a boatload of attractive female models.
CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY:
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the nubiles-porn network, so you get access to the entire nubiles-porn network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-I really enjoy the on-screen photo viewer. It's easy to use, and you can control the speed the images remain.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content.
-The site watermark is small and located at the bottom right corner of each photo, so it's out of the way.
-The models are young, attractive, slender teens, and the stunt cocks look like they could be real ballet dancers, adding to the fantasy. There isn't much of a plot or build-up: the female model is dressed as a ballerina, doing a few moves by a barre (the stationary handrail that ballet dancers use). The male dancer shows up, they might kiss or hold or touch each other, then they have sex. But the set is clean, the costumes simple dance outfits, the colors are strong and real, the technical features (focus, lighting, sound, etc) is very good.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photosets average over 100 photos per set. These are good quality photos. Much better than screencaps.
And since the models are attractive, the photosets are worth keeping.
The photosets come in multiple definitios for download in a zip file:
1200x800px, 2000x1334px, 7952x5304px.
The videos come in multiple definitions for streaming and download:
270p up to 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. Only 39 episodes.
-Archive site. Or you could say it's a site with a very erratic, slow, update rate.
-This is not a con against the site, but both the PU site and The Best Porn site say the one year membership is free.
That seems to be a mistake.
On The Best Porn site there is the notice:
"Simply enter the site (this link or any on this page) and look for the lower price on the credit card billing page."
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I click on the link at The Best Porn, hit the join link at Petite Ballerinas Fucked, and see a price of $99.95/year, recurring. That is a sale price, but it's not free.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site (also called a series by nubiles-porn) was started in 2015-09-02.
The site only has 39 episodes, so it's a tiny site.
The update rate is very erratic: sometimes there is one video added in a month, then months go by with no new videos. The last video was added 2019-09-08, so you could consider this an archive site, or a site with an amazingly slow update rate.
That is a shame, because the quality of the videos is excellent: The models are petite (tiny) girls who are dressed in ballerina costumes. A stunt cock comes along, in theory the girl's dancing partner, and they have sex. The visuals are outstanding: clear, crisp visuals for the video. The girls are white, slender, young.
Not too much make-up, but they are just luscious. Maybe not the right word: striking and adorable and eminently fuckable is a better way to describe the models. (Pardon the French, LOL).
The sex is not harsh: it's more like a girl and a guy with strong sexual drives getting off together: not love, just sex.
What makes it memorable is the girl is slender, white, young, attractive, and she's dressed in a ballerina costume. Doing some dance exercises. Then the male dancer appears (he looks like he could be a real dancer).
So there's a small element of realism to the video. And the couple is clean. And attractive. And the sex is good. Not great. There's no harshness or violence or cruelty to the sex:
It's an interesting site. A niche site, because the theme is slender white ballerinas who are having sex with their dance partner.
But since the site is so small (only 39 episodes), you'll be able to download the entire site, or what you want to keep, very easily. And in a short time.
And since there are little to no updates, you will then move on to the rest of the network, which thankfully has enough material to keep you occupied for a good while.
There are 17 sites (or series) in the network.
Covering different niches.
Scoring the site is not easy:
Because the site is so small (39 episodes, remember), and there are few if any updates, those are large negatives.
However, the videos and photosets are first rate, technically.
And the girls are slender white teens who are very attractive. I say teens, they look like teens, but some could be in their early twenties.
So if that's the kind of model you like, the score goes up.
And with network access, the score goes up even more. The nubiles-porn network is an excellent network.
So I'm giving the site a score of 88. That is very subjective.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
